Analysis of hepatitis G virus infection markers in blood donors and patients with hepatitis

The incidence and clinical significance of hepatitis G virus (HGV) is still not fully known. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of HGV RNA and antibody to HGV E2 protein (anti-E2) in Polish blood donors and patients with hepatitis, and to compare the sequence of HGV clones with those reported by others. Two-hundred and nineteen blood donors and 83 patients with hepatitis were studied. HGV was detected in 3.2% and anti-E2 in 24.2% of blood donors and in 26.5% and 8.4% of patients with hepatitis, respectively. HGV was detected as a co-infection with HCV in four of 18 patients with chronic hepatitis, in four of 16 patients with acute hepatitis and in one of six patients with fulminant liver failure (FLF), and as a co-infection with HBV in one of six patients with FLF and in three of 10 patients with chronic hepatitis. In non-A–C hepatitis, eight of 23 patients with acute hepatitis and one of four patients with FLF were positive for HGV but all 10 patients with chronic cryptogenic hepatitis were negative. In the follow-up studies of patients with HGV alone, a correlation with viraemia and clinical symptoms was observed in two patients, but in three others HGV RNA was detected in spite of clinical resolution. Two HGV clones were sequenced, and the sequence of the HGV helicase region of the HGV isolates from donor and patient were homologous to those described by others. Hence, the frequency of HGV RNA in blood donors is similar to that obtained in other countries but the anti-E2 (marker of a past infection) frequency is higher. The incidence of HGV RNA and anti-E2 in hepatitis patients suggests that HGV plays a role in liver pathology, but careful analysis of individual cases does not confirm this.     

Analysis of hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA, antibody to HGV envelope protein, and risk factors for blood donors coinfected with HGV and hepatitis C virus

Serologic, biochemical, and molecular analyses were used to study hepatitis G virus (HGV), antibody to the HGV envelope protein (anti-E2), risk factors, clinical significance, and the impact of HGV on coexistent hepatitis C virus (HCV). Among 329 donors with confirmed HCV infection, 12% were HGV RNA-positive and 44% were anti-E2-positive (total exposure, 56%). HGV RNA and anti-E2 were mutually exclusive except in 9 donors (1.5%); 8 of 9 subsequently lost HGV RNA but anti-E2 persisted. HGV had little impact on alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in donors with HGV infection alone or those coinfected with HCV. A multivariate analysis showed that intravenous drug abuse was the leading risk factor for HGV transmission, followed by blood transfusion, snorting cocaine, imprisonment, and a history of sexually transmitted diseases. In summary, HGV and HCV infections were frequently associated and shared common parenteral risk factors; HGV did not appear to cause hepatitis or to worsen the course of coexistent hepatitis C.     

Prevalence of hepatitis G virus RNA in a monocentric population of French haemophiliacs

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) and hepatitis GB virus (GBV-C) have been reported as possible causes of non-A–E transfusional hepatitis. To assess the prevalence of hepatitis G virus infection in haemophiliacs we retrospectively investigated the presence of viral RNA in 92 patients with and without HCV infection. HGV/GBV-C RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified with primers from the 5' non-coding region of the genome. RNA was detected in 16/92 patients (17.4%). Restriction enzyme analysis revealed that the 16 patients belonged to the HGV-like genotype. Serology with E2-specific antibodies demonstrated that HGV viraemia underestimates previous infection by HGV. 33 patients were positive for HGV; all but two have cleared HGV RNA. 47/92 patients had a marker of prior infection by HGV.
No difference between HGV RNA positive and negative patients was observed concerning age, diagnosis, HIV and HCV status. Previous HBV infection correlated with the frequency of HGV infection. There was no difference in alanine aminotransferase levels between HGV positive and negative patients. All 18 patients exposed to only virally inactivated plasma-derived concentrates were negative for both HGV RNA and anti E2 antibodies.
Prior exposure to untreated concentrates correlated with HGV viraemia ( P =0.03), HGV seropositivity ( P =0.0002), and markers of HGV infection ( P <0.0001).
In haemophiliacs with a past exposure to non-inactivated concentrates, persistence of HCV RNA (53/74 patients) was more frequent than HGV RNA persistence (16/74 patients) although HGV viraemia is more frequent than HCV viraemia in blood donors. This may be related to a greater ability of individuals to clear HGV infection and suggests that hepatitis G virus infection in multi-transfused patients has a better outcome than infection with other blood-borne viruses.     

Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Hepatitis G Virus Infection in Blood Donors and Immunocompromised Recipients of HGV-Contaminated Blood

Background and objectives: The infectiousness and clinical relevance of the newly discovered blood-borne Flaviviridae-like agent, termed hepatitis G virus (HGV), are not well understood. Materials and methods: Twenty-three transfusion recipients of two HGV-affected long-term blood donors were studied for HGV genome and antibodies to the putative envelope 2 glycoprotein (anti-E2) of HGV. Nine recipients had nonhematological disorders and 14 suffered from severe hematological diseases and 7 of them received allogeneic bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation. The molecular epidemiology of the observed HGV infection was studied by direct sequencing of parts of the 5′-noncoding region, NS3, and NS5 region of HGV in the 2 long-term donors and in their 6 recipients who became HGV RNA positive. Additionally, 549 individuals – homologous (n = 254) and autologous blood donors (n = 202), and medical staff (n = 89) – were investigated for the presence of HGV RNA. Results: HGV RNA in serum was found in 15 of the 23 (65%) transfusion reciients with known exposure of HGV-contaminated blood. Seven of the remaining 8 recipients showed only an anti-E2 response, indicating previous HGV infection with spontaneous clearance of the virus. In one recipient neither HGV RNA nor anti-E2 could be detected. Molecular evidence for HGV transmission by the 2 donors was found in 3 of the 6 recipients studied. The alanine aminotransferase levels were not significantly different in the HGV RNA positive and negative recipients, and none of the 23 recipients developed posttransfusion hepatitis. Persistent HGV infection was observed especially in recipients with severe hematological disorders or in those in whome intensive immunosuppressive treatment was necessary. Of the 549 individuals studied, 10 (1.8%) were healthy carriers of HGV RNA. Conclusion: The persistence of transfusion-acquired HGV infection is not associated with acute or chronic hepatitis, but may be influenced by the recipient's underlying disease.     

Status and natural course of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus infection among high-risk groups and volunteer blood donors in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia, thalassemia and uremia patients are at risk of parenterally transmitted infectious agents. The status and nature of the course of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus (GBV-C/HGV) infection among these groups and blood donors in Taiwan was investigated. METHODS: Serum GBV-C HGV-RNA and antibodies to GBV-C/HGV envelope-2-protein (anti-E2) were determined in 500 blood donors and in 44 hemophilia, 37 thalassemia and 85 uremia patients. Phylogenetic analysis was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of GBV-C/HGV-RNA and anti-E2, respectively, was 38.6 and 27.3% in hemophilia patients, 27.0 and 27.3% in thalassemia patients, 14.1 and 10.6% in uremia patients and 3.4 and 7.2% in blood donors. The prevalence of GBV-C HGV exposure was 59.1 and 51.4% in hemophilia and thalassemia patients, respectively, which was significantly higher than that for uremia patients (22.4%; P < 0.01) and blood donors (10.2%; P < 0.001). The anti-E2 seroconversion rate was 66.7% in blood donors and 47.4, 36.8 and 34.6% in thalassemia, uremia (P < 0.05 compared with blood donors) and hemophilia (P < 0.01 compared with blood donors) patients, respectively. Discrepancies in the prevalence of GBV-C HGV and hepatitis C virus infection were found among the three risk groups. Phylogenetic analysis showed that 51 of 56 GBV-C HGV isolates clustered in group 3; the remaining five were of group 2a. Twelve of 39 viremic patients in the risk groups cleared the virus during the 4 year follow-up period; seven developed concomitant anti-E2 reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: GB virus C hepatitis G virus infection is epidemic among risk groups and GBV-C HGV group 3 is the major strain in Taiwan. In the risk groups, approximately 18% of infections resolve with concomitant anti-E2 seroconversion within 4 years.     

血液透析患者丙型和庚型肝炎病毒感染的研究

为了解血液透析患者中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和庚型肝炎病毒(HGV)的感染情况,并探讨相对危险因素,对48例在302医院和武警总医院进行维持性血液透析的患者用逆转录聚合酶链(PCR)反应和酶联免疫法检测了血清中HCV RNA、HGV RNA及其抗体水平。结果显示,抗-HCV和HCV RNA阳     

HGV: the identification,biology and prevalence of an orphan virus

ABSTRACT— Hepatitis G virus (HGV) and GB virus C (GBV-C) (both hereinafter referred to as HGV) were independently identified in patients with hepatitis of unknown aetiology. HGV is a positive-sense RNA virus of the family Flaviviridae. The virus can establish both acute and chronic infection and appears to be sensitive to interferon. Horizontal transmission is mainly parenteral, although other routes such as vertical have been well documented. High risk groups include intravenous drug users (IVDUs), the multiply transfused, haemodialysis patients and haemophiliacs. Up to 90% of IVDUs are positive for either HGV-RNA or antibodies to HGV envelope-2 protein (anti-E2). HGV is frequently detected in patients with HBV and HCV infection. Its link to hepatitis has now become less certain. Only around 3–6% of non-A–E hepatitis cases are HGV viraemic, clearly showing that HGV is not the major cause of idiopathic hepatitis as originally hoped. Around 1–5% of volunteer blood donors in developed countries are HGV viraemic, but the prevalence is 10–20% in the general population in some developing countries. At present, it is not known whether HGV is associated with other diseases in humans, is a passenger virus, or only becomes virulent under certain conditions.     

Natural course of HGV infection in haemophiliacs

The natural course of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection was clarified in 70 haemophiliacs by testing for HGV RNA and antibodies against HGV envelope protein (anti-E2). None of 12 patients treated with only virus-inactivated coagulation factors were infected with HGV. Of 58 patients who received non-inactivated products, 28 (48%) were positive for HGV RNA and/or anti-E2. Of 16 patients with anti-E2, 14 were negative for the viral RNA, and had recovered from HGV infections. HCV antibodies were detected in 59 patients, and eight patients were successively negative for HCV RNA. Thus, the recovery rate of HGV infection (14/28, 50%) was higher than that of HCV (8/59, 14%) ( P  < 0.001). Longitudinal study revealed that anti-E2 developed either during viraemia or some years after seronegativity for HGV RNA. Hence the antibody response itself seemed not to play a major role in the clearance of HGV, though anti-E2 was associated with the clearance of HGV RNA. In conclusion, HGV and HCV are prevalent in patients treated with unsterilized coagulation factor concentrates. However, in contrast to HCV, spontaneous recovery is frequently observed in HGV infections.     

Prevalence of GBV-C/hepatitis G virus viremia and anti-E2 in Canadian blood donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a recently recognized parenterally and sexually transmitted agent. The prevalence of GBV-C/HGV markers in Canadian blood donors has not been previously studied and was therefore determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood donors [identity unlinked (IU), short-term temporarily deferred (STTD) and autologous groups] and donor samples with antibodies to hepatitis C (anti-HCV) or hepatitis B core were tested for GBV-C/HGV RNA and for antibodies to E2 antigen (anti-E2). RESULTS: GBV-C/HGV RNA was found in 1.1% and anti-E2 in 7.3% of the combined IU/STTD donor group. Viremia was much more common in anti-HCV-positive samples (12.5%); anti-E2 was present in >50% of this group. In the STTD group, female gender was significantly associated with viremia. CONCLUSION: GBV-C/HGV infection is relatively common in Canadian donors, and a small proportion are viremic. The association of female gender and viremia was unexpected. Further study is needed to clarify the epidemiology and natural history of GBV-C/HGV infection.     

肾透析患者血清中庚型肝炎病毒核酸的检测和与乙、丙型肝炎病毒同时感染分析

目的:了解肾透析患者庚型肝炎病毒(HGV)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)合并感染的状况。方法:应用逆转录多聚酶链反应扩增庚型肝炎病毒基因,采用蛋白酶K裂解法提取血清中HGV RNA,逆转录为cDNA后进行巢式扩增,获得238bp的特异性片段。用此方法对28例肾透析患者血清标本进行检测。结果:发现28例患者血清中有4例HGV RNA阳性。这4例患者同时合并HCV感染,其中2例为HBV、HCV、HGV合并感染。结论:肾透析患者是HGV感染的高危人群,HGV在肾透析患者中常与HCV、HBV合并感染。     

Hepatitis G virus exposure in dialysis staff

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a blood-borne virus. Some present data demonstrate an occupational risk of HGV infection in medical staff of dialysis units. The aim of this investigation was to assess the prevalence of HGV exposure in dialysis staff. This study was performed in a main dialysis unit in Iran. In 27 dialysis staff, HGV exposure was detected serologically by the presence of anti HGV envelope protein E2 (anti-E2) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and compared with 77 hemodialysis (HD) and 13 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. All of them were also screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV). A low prevalence of HGV exposure was found in the dialysis staff (0%), which nearly corresponded to the prevalence of the dialysis patients (HD 3.89%, CAPD 0%). The prevalence of anti-HCV and anti-HBs in staff was 37.03% and 33.33%, respectively, which was higher than HGV anti-E2. The prevalence of HGV exposure was low in dialysis staff in our study, and was near to the prevalence of HGV exposure in dialysis patients. Therefore, it can be concluded that the occupational risk for HGV exposure in our investigation was minimal.     

Hepatitis G virus infection markers (RNA and anti-E2 antibodies) in a multicenter cohort of hemophiliacs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and evolution of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection in hemophiliacs and to correlate evolution of HGV infection markers with immunologic parameters in those patients co-infected with HIV. DESIGN AND METHODS: HGV RNA and anti-E2 antibodies were studied in 124 patients. Serial samples were drawn every 4 months from 1992 to 1996. Lymphocyte subsets including T-helper lymphocytes, T-suppressor lymphocytes, T-cytotoxic lymphocytes, activated T-lymphocytes and natural killer cells were analyzed. RESULTS: Prevalences were 22.6% for HGV RNA and 18.5% for anti-E2. Four patients had both HGV RNA and anti E2, so the overall prevalence of HGV infection in hemophiliacs was 37.9% (11.5% in 200 controls, p<0.0001). After a median follow-up of 36.6 months 20 patients remained HGV RNA positive, whereas HGV RNA had cleared in 8, with an actuarial probability of clearance at 36 months of 34.6%. Only 2 patients developed anti-E2 antibodies. Four patients cleared anti-E2, with an actuarial probability at 36 months of 24.8%. In patients with HIV infection, both lower CD4+ lymphocyte count (p=0.01) or higher CD8+ lymphocyte count (p=0.03) showed predictive value for probability of clearing HGV-RNA. CD4+/CD8+ ratio (p=0.002) was the only variable included in the best model for HGV-RNA disappearance. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A more accurate estimation of the prevalence of HGV infection can be achieved with the determination of both HGV RNA and anti-E2. Anti-E2 response can be undetectable or transitory after disappearance of HGV-RNA, giving therefore rise to the possibility of underestimating HGV prevalence with currently diagnostic methods. In HIV-positive patients, cellular immune function seems to be involved in the resolution of HGV infection, following the significant correlation found between clearance of HGV-RNA and CD4+/CD8+ lymphocyte populations.