Topiramate in Bipolar and Schizoaffective Disorders: Weight Loss and Efficacy

BACKGROUND: Although useful in bipolar disorder, mood stabilizers, such as lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine, can cause significant weight gain. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 5 patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder who were treated with topiramate as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy. RESULTS: All 5 patients had a good response to treatment at a mean topiramate dose of 195 mg/day (range, 100-375 mg/day). All patients lost a substantial amount of weight on topiramate treatment. The average weight loss was 22 lb (10 kg; range, 8-56 lb [4-25 kg]). None of the patients discontinued topiramate because of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topiramate may represent a valuable alternative to existing mood stabilizers, either as an adjunct or as monotherapy in patients with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder.     

Treatment of binge-eating disorder with topiramate: a clinical case series

BACKGROUND: Reduced appetite and weight loss were found in clinical trials of topiramate for epilepsy. Binge-eating disorder is characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating that are not associated with regular use of inappropriate compensatory behaviors. Overweight and obesity may be common complications. To explore the effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate in binge-eating disorder, we describe the response of 13 consecutive outpatients with binge-eating disorder to naturalistic, open-label treatment with topiramate. METHOD: The response of 13 female outpatients with binge-eating disorder by DSM-IV criteria to naturalistic, open-label treatment with topiramate (100-1400 mg/day) was reviewed. Response of binge-eating disorder symptoms was clinically assessed as none, mild, moderate, marked, or remission. Weight and side effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: All 13 patients had comorbid Axis I psychiatric disorders along with binge-eating disorder and were receiving psychotropic medications at the time of topiramate administration. After beginning topiramate treatment, 9 patients displayed a moderate or better response of binge-eating disorder symptoms that was maintained for periods ranging from 3 to 30 months (mean +/- SD = 18.7+/-8.0 months). Two other patients displayed moderate or marked responses that subsequently diminished. The remaining 2 patients had a mild or no response. The mean +/- SD weight of the 13 patients decreased from 99.3+/-26.4 kg to 87.5+/-20.4 kg (z = -2.4, df = 1, p = .02), but only 7 patients lost > or = 5 kg of weight. The mean topiramate treatment dose was 492.3+/-467.8 mg/day for all 13 patients. The mean topiramate dose was higher in patients who lost > or = 5 kg than in patients who lost < 5 kg. Also, topiramate dose correlated significantly with weight loss (p < .01). In general, topiramate was well tolerated, with neurologic side effects the most common. Of 3 patients who discontinued topiramate because of side effects, 2 resumed the drug at a later date without significant recurrence of these effects. CONCLUSION: Topiramate may be an effective treatment for binge-eating disorder. Controlled studies of topiramate in binge-eating disorder appear warranted.     

Topiramate in the treatment of binge eating disorder associated with obesity: a randomized,placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Binge eating disorder is associated with obesity. Topiramate is an antiepileptic agent associated with weight loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate topiramate in the treatment of binge eating disorder associated with obesity. METHOD: For this 14-week, double-blind, flexible-dose (25-600 mg/day) topiramate trial, 61 outpatients (53 women, eight men) with binge eating disorder who were obese (body mass index >/=30 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to receive topiramate (N=30) or placebo (N=31). The primary efficacy measure was binge frequency. The primary analysis of efficacy was a repeated-measures random regression with treatment-by-time as the effect measure. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, topiramate was associated with a significantly greater rate of reduction in binge frequency, binge day frequency, body mass index, weight, and scores on the Clinical Global Impression severity scale and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (modified for binge eating). Topiramate was also associated with significantly greater reductions in binge frequency (topiramate: 94%, placebo: 46%) and binge day frequency (topiramate: 93%, placebo: 46%) and with a significantly higher level of response than placebo. The mean weight loss for topiramate-treated subjects who completed the study was 5.9 kg. Median topiramate dose was 212 mg/day (range=50-600). Nine patients (three receiving placebo, six given topiramate) discontinued because of adverse events. The most common reasons for discontinuing topiramate were headache (N=3) and paresthesias (N=2). CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate was efficacious and relatively well tolerated in the short-term treatment of binge eating disorder associated with obesity.     

Antimanic efficacy of topiramate in 11 patients in an open trial with an on-off-on design

BACKGROUND: A series of open studies suggests that topiramate has efficacy in bipolar disorder. To further investigate the potential value of topiramate as an antimanic agent, we conducted an open trial in 11 manic patients. METHOD: Eleven patients with bipolar I disorder with an acute manic episode (DSM-IV) were treated with a mood stabilizer and/or antipsychotics in sufficient and fixed doses. All had a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score of at least 24 (mean +/- SD = 33.5+/-8.1). Topiramate was added after stable plasma levels of concomitant mood stabilizers had been reached and was titrated within 1 week to a final dose in the range of 25 to 200 mg/day, depending on clinical efficacy and tolerability. Topiramate was discontinued after 10 days, while concomitant medication remained unchanged. After 5 days, topiramate was reintroduced at similar or increased dosages for another 7 days. Patients were assessed with the YMRS; the Clinical Global Impressions scale version for bipolar patients; and the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. RESULTS: Seven of the 11 patients initially showed a good antimanic response with > 50% reduction in YMRS score. One patient showed psychotic features following rapid increase in topiramate dosage and dropped out on day 10. After discontinuation of topiramate, 7 of the remaining 10 patients worsened (increase of > or = 25% in YMRS score), 2 remained stable, and 1 discontinued follow-up after good recovery. After reintroducing topiramate, all patients improved again within a week, with 8 of 9 meeting the responder criterion of > or = 50% YMRS score reduction when comparing baseline values with those of day 22. With the exception of the patient who developed psychosis, topiramate was well tolerated. Concomitant medication did not interfere with plasma levels of drug, except for carbamazepine level in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The antimanic response among patients in this study appears reproducibly linked to the addition of topiramate.     

Topiramate slow dose titration: improved efficacy and tolerability

Topiramate is an effective treatment for several types of seizures. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of slow topiramate dose titration as add-on therapy in childhood epilepsy. This investigation is a prospective open-label, single-center, add-on study in 22 children with a diagnosis of refractory epilepsy. Topiramate (dose 0.5-2 mg/kg/day) was titrated at 2-week intervals up to the recommended dose of 6-12 mg/kg/day. Seizure frequency rate reduction was significant, declining from 23 +/- 5.1 seizures/week (mean +/- S.E.M.) at baseline phase to 3.5 +/- 1.2 seizures/week at the end of the 16-week stabilization phase (P < 0.001). After 16 weeks of stabilization, 19 patients (86%) had more than 50% seizure reduction. Seven patients (31%) were 100% seizure-free. Two patients (9%) manifested no improvement; only one patient (5%) did not tolerate the added drug and discontinued topiramate. One patient manifested severe side effects, whereas 21 patients experienced mild to moderate side effects mostly represented by somnolence, nervousness, and anorexia with or without weight loss. We conclude that slow dose titration improves efficacy and tolerability of topiramate as add-on therapy in the treatment in refractory epilepsy.     

Treatment of bulimia nervosa with topiramate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, part 1: improvement in binge and purge measures

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate in bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Patients with DSM-IV bulimia nervosa were randomly assigned in equal proportions to receive topiramate (N = 35) or placebo (N = 34) for 10 weeks (between April 1999 and Dec. 2000). Topiramate treatment was started at 25 mg/day and titrated by 25 to 50 mg/week to a maximum of 400 mg/day. The primary efficacy measure was mean weekly number of binge and/or purge days. Related outcome measures included mean weekly number of binge days and binge frequency, as well as mean weekly number of purge days and purge frequency. RESULTS: Sixty-four outpatients (33 placebo, 31 topiramate) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median topiramate dose was 100 mg/day (range, 25-400 mg/day). Mean +/- SD baseline number of weekly binge and/or purge days was 5.0 +/- 1.6 for topiramate patients and 5.1 +/- 1.5 for placebo patients. The primary efficacy measure, mean weekly number of binge and/or purge days, decreased 44.8% from baseline with topiramate versus 10.7% with placebo (p =.004). The mean weekly number of binge days decreased 48.2% with topiramate versus 17.7% with placebo (p =.015), and mean binge frequency decreased 49.2% with topiramate versus 28.0% with placebo (p =.071). The mean weekly number of purge days decreased 43.4% with topiramate versus 16.6% with placebo (p =.016), and mean purge frequency decreased 49.8% with topiramate versus 21.6% with placebo (p =.016). Three patients (2 placebo, 1 topiramate) discontinued from the trial due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Topiramate was associated with significant improvements in both binge and purge symptoms in this study population and represents a potential treatment for bulimia nervosa.     

Topiramate as add-on treatment for patients with bipolar mania

Objective: Anticonvulsant agents such as carbamazepine and valproate are alternatives to lithium in treating subjects with bipolar disorder. Topiramate (Topamax®), a new antiepileptic agent, is a candidate drug for bipolar disorder. We evaluated topiramate as adjunctive treatment for bipolar patients.
Methods: Eighteen patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder [mania (n=12), hypomania (n=1), mixed episode (n=5), and rapid cycling (n=6)], and two subjects with schizoaffective disorder  –  bipolar type, resistant to current mood-stabilizer treatment were initiated on topiramate, 25 mg/day, increasing by 25–50 mg every 3–7 days to a target dose between 100 and 300 mg/day, as other medications were held constant for 5 weeks. The Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D), and Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version Scale (CGI-BP) were used to rate subjects weekly.
Results: By 5 weeks, 12 (60%) subjects were responders, i.e., 50% reduction in the Y-MRS scores and a CGI of 'much' or 'very much improved'. Three subjects were 'minimally improved', four showed no change, and one was 'minimally worse'. Six subjects had parasthesia, three experienced fatigue, and two had 'word-finding' difficulties; in all cases, side effects were transient. All patients lost weight with a mean of 9.4 lb in 5 weeks, and a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) occurred too.
Conclusions: Topiramate appears to have efficacy for the manic and mixed phases of bipolar illness. Other preliminary data suggest antidepressant efficacy too. Among obese bipolar subjects, the weight loss potential of topiramate may be beneficial. If controlled trials confirm these initial results, topiramate may be a significant addition to the available treatments for bipolar disorder.     

Long-term topiramate treatment of psychotropic drug-induced weight gain: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of long-term topiramate treatment of psychotropic drug-induced weight gain. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of the charts of patients treated with add-on topiramate in order to control weight gain induced by psychotropic drugs (antipsychotic drugs, lithium or valproate). RESULTS: The case series consisted of 100 patients. The mean final dose of topiramate was 186.8+/-138.3 mg/day, whereas the median dose was 200 mg/day for a total treatment duration of 41+/-38 weeks. Adverse events led to topiramate discontinuation in 22% of the sample. A significant reduction in body mass index was observed between the first and last measures, from 29.7+/-3.6 to 28+/-3.3 (t=5.82, P<.0005). The reduction in body mass index was greater in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs than in those treated with lithium or valproate alone. No difference was found between subjects with and those without comorbid active substance abuse or dependence. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective case series, topiramate was found to be effective in reversing weight gain associated with antipsychotic drugs, lithium or valproate. Tolerability of topiramate was an issue in some patients.     

Topiramate Treatment of Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: A Retrospective Chart Review

The objective of this paper was to determine if topiramate is effective as treatment for bipolar spectrum disorders in a naturalistic setting. All charts of outpatients treated with topiramate (n = 76) were reviewed, and clinical response was assessed retrospectively using the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Improvement. Mild improvement was seen in 47% (n = 36) and moderate-to-marked improvement in 13% (n = 10) Responders received a higher mean dose (180 mg/day) than did nonresponders (83.2 mg/day, p = 0.002). Topiramate dose was also higher in those who lost weight (138.3 mg/day) than in those who did not (70 mg/day, p = 0.007). Weight loss was experienced by 50% of the sample, with a mean loss of 14.2 lbs. Side effects were reported by 82% n = 62) of the population, including cognitive effects, sedation, parasthesias, nausea, insomnia, headache, and dizziness. Adverse effects led 36% (n = 27) of the total sample to discontinue treatment with topiramate. Topiramate led to significant weight loss in about half of this bipolar population, while also improving mood symptoms at least mildly in most patients. Topiramate response and weight loss were both dose-related, with efficacy, in particular, associated with higher doses (mean = 18 0 mg/day) than frequently used in current clinical practice.     

Atypical antipsychotics and weight gain in Chinese patients: a comparison of olanzapine and risperidone

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of olanzapine with that of risperidone on weight change among Chinese patients in Hong Kong. METHOD: The body weight of subjects maintained on olanzapine or risperidone treatment was recorded at the outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital. Pretreatment weight of the subjects was retrieved from case records. Subjects on olanzapine treatment were matched in sex, age, and diagnosis with those on risperidone treatment, and demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The study was conducted in May and June 2002. RESULTS: Twenty-eight olanzapine-risperidone matched pairs were studied. All were diagnosed with DSM-IV schizophrenia. In patients treated with olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, mean +/- SD duration of treatment with atypical neuroleptics was 103.5 +/- 47.4 weeks and 93.2 +/- 50.6 weeks (range, 21-255 weeks), and mean doses were 12.4 +/- 6.7 mg/day and 4.5 +/- 2.8 mg/day. The mean +/- SD weight gain of subjects on treatment with olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, was 8.34 +/- 5.97 kg (18.53 +/- 13.27 lb) and 2.74 +/- 8.09 kg (6.09 +/- 17.98 lb) with a statistically significant difference at p < .005. Lower baseline body weight and body mass index were associated with greater weight gain in both olanzapine- and risperidone-treated subjects. Gender, age, mean daily dose, and duration of treatment had no effect on weight change. CONCLUSION: Treatment with olanzapine was associated with significantly greater weight gain than treatment with risperidone in Chinese schizophrenia patients in Hong Kong. The effect of adjunctive anticonvulsant treatment on weight gain requires further study.     

Topiramate monotherapy in the management of acute mania: results of four double-blind placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in adults with acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. METHODS: In four trials, adults hospitalized with acute mania, a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, history of > or =1 previous manic or mixed episodes, and > or =20 Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score were randomized to double-blind treatment with topiramate (target doses: 200, 400, or 600 mg/day) or placebo; two trials included an active comparator (lithium, 1500 mg/day). The core study duration in all trials was 3 weeks; three trials also had 9-week double-blind extensions. The primary efficacy variable was mean change from baseline in YMRS in the core 3-week study. RESULTS: Changes in YMRS score during 3 weeks were not significantly different for topiramate versus placebo (mean YMRS reductions, -5.1 to -8.4). Mean YMRS reductions in lithium-treated groups were significantly greater (p < or = 0.001 versus placebo and topiramate). A similar pattern was observed after 12 weeks of double-blind treatment in studies with double-blind extensions. Paresthesia, appetite decrease, dry mouth, and weight loss were more frequently associated with topiramate than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These studies do not support the efficacy of topiramate as monotherapy in acute mania or mixed episodes in adults with bipolar I disorder. Topiramate was not associated with mood destabilization measured as mania exacerbation or treatment-emergent depression. Lithium was confirmed as an effective therapy in this population.     

A 24-week, randomized, controlled trial of adjunctive sibutramine versus topiramate in the treatment of weight gain in overweight or obese patients with bipolar disorders

OBJECTIVES: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) have an increased risk of obesity as well as psychotropic-associated weight gain. The objective of this study was to compare sibutramine and topiramate as adjunctive treatments for psychotropic-associated weight gain in overweight or obese outpatients with BD. METHODS: In this 24-week, open-label, flexible-dose, comparison trial, 46 outpatients with bipolar disorders who had a body mass index (BMI) > or =30 kg/m(2), or > or =27 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidities, and psychotropic-associated weight gain were randomly assigned to receive sibutramine (n = 18; 5-15 mg/day) or topiramate (n = 28; 25-600 mg/day). The primary outcome measure was weight loss. Secondary measures included changes in BMI, percent body weight loss, and mood symptoms. RESULTS: Patients randomized either to sibutramine or topiramate lost comparable amounts of weight (4.1 +/- 5.7 and 2.8 +/- 3.5 kg, respectively) and displayed similar rates of weight loss (0.85 and 0.82 kg/week, respectively). However, only four (22%) patients receiving sibutramine and six (21%) patients receiving topiramate completed the 24-week trial. In addition, the attrition patterns for the two drugs were different, with patients discontinuing topiramate doing so early in treatment and patients discontinuing sibutramine doing so throughout treatment. Also, higher ratings of manic and depressive symptoms significantly increased risk for early topiramate discontinuation compared to that for sibutramine. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive sibutramine and topiramate may have comparable weight loss effects in overweight or obese bipolar patients with psychotropic-associated weight gain, but are each associated with similarly high discontinuation rates. In addition, they may have different attrition profiles. Compared to sibutramine, discontinuation of topiramate may be more likely to occur early in treatment and may be more dependent upon manic and depressive symptoms.     

Quetiapine alone and added to a mood stabilizer for serious mood disorders.

BACKGROUND: Use of antipsychotic medication intermittently or over the long term may be necessary in treating patients with bipolar disorder whose symptoms have responded suboptimally to standard mood-stabilizing agents. Quetiapine fumarate is an effective novel antipsychotic with mixed serotonergic (5-HT2) and dopaminergic (D2) activity. This is an open-label, 12-week prospective study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in the treatment of patients with bipolar and schizoaffective disorder who were suboptimally responsive to mood stabilizers alone. METHOD: Participants in the study were inpatients or outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar or schizoaffective disorder. Baseline psychopathology was evaluated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Involuntary movements were rated with the Simpson-Angus Neurologic Rating Scale. Quetiapine was added on an open-label basis and increased to optimum clinical dosage. Psychopathology and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale ratings were repeated weekly for the first 4 weeks and then again at weeks 8 and 12. RESULTS: Ten individuals with bipolar disorder and 10 with schizoaffective disorder received quetiapine therapy. Overall, patients improved, with significant improvement in BPRS (p < .001), YMRS (p = .043), and HAM-D scores (p = .002). Simpson-Angus score also significantly decreased (p = .02). Overall. quetiapine was well tolerated by patients in this group with serious mood disorders. The mean +/- SD quetiapine dose was 202.9 +/- 124.3 mg/day (range, 50-400 mg/day). Mean weight gain was 10.9 lb (4.9 kg). CONCLUSION: Although limited by its small size, open-label design, and relative gender homogeneity, this study suggests that quetiapine therapy may be useful in the treatment of individuals with serious mood disorders who are suboptimally responsive to mood stabilizers alone. These preliminary findings should be explored in larger, controlled trials.     

Open-label adjunctive topiramate in the treatment of unstable bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess open-label adjunctive topiramate in the treatment of outpatients with unstable bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD: Outpatients with DSM-IV-defined BD (I or II) exhibiting mood instability were enrolled in this 16-week, open-label, multicentre study. Topiramate was added to existing mood stabilizers and other psychotropic treatments. The primary effectiveness measure was the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale; other scales included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events, measuring tremor, monitoring vital signs and weight, and laboratory indices. We also evaluated patient satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were enrolled. Intent-to-treat analysis showed significant improvement from baseline in the CGI-S, YMRS, and MADRS, starting at Week 2 (P < 0.001), with further accrual of benefit between Week 2 and Week 16 (P < 0.001). The mean modal dosage of topiramate during the stable dosing period was 180 mg daily. There was a mean 1.8 kg decrease in patient weight from topiramate initiation to Week 16 (P < 0.001). Topiramate was well tolerated by most patients; 11% withdrew from the study owing to adverse events. We noted a significant reduction in the mean severity score for preexisting tremor by Week 8 of treatment (P < 0.005); no notable changes in vital signs were observed. At Week 16, 50% of the patients were "completely satisfied" with topiramate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive topiramate treatment can reduce the severity of manic and depressive symptoms, as well as reducing tremor and weight in outpatients with BD I or II.     

Topiramate in the long-term treatment of binge-eating disorder associated with obesity

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate in binge-eating disorder (BED) with obesity. METHOD: Sixty-one patients with BED (DSM-IV-TR criteria) and obesity enrolled in a 14-week, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Completers (N = 35) were offered participation in a 42-week, open-label extension trial of topiramate. Fifteen patients who received topiramate and 16 patients who received placebo in the double-blind study entered the open-label trial. Topiramate was titrated from 25 mg/day to a maximum of 600 mg/day. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in weekly binge frequency using the last observation carried forward for all patients who received topiramate. Baseline for patients receiving double-blind topiramate was the beginning of the controlled study; for patients receiving placebo, baseline was the beginning of the open-label trial. Open-label data were gathered from December 1998 to November 2000. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (31 who received topiramate in the open-label trial plus 13 who received topiramate in the double-blind study only) received at least 1 dose of topiramate; 43 patients provided outcome measures at a median final dose of 250 mg/day. Mean weekly binge frequency declined significantly from baseline to final visit for all 43 patients (-3.2; p < .001), for the 15 patients who received topiramate during the controlled and open-label studies (-4.0; p < .001), and for the 15 patients who received topiramate only during the open-label trial (-2.5; p = .044). Patients also exhibited statistically significant reduction in body weight. The most common reasons for topiramate discontinuation were protocol nonadherence (N = 17) and adverse events (N = 14). CONCLUSION: Topiramate treatment was associated with enduring improvement in some patients with BED and obesity but was also associated with a high discontinuation rate.     

A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of lamotrigine in the treatment of obesity in adults

OBJECTIVE: Unlike many pharmacotherapies for mood disorders, lamotrigine has not been shown to be associated with weight gain. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lamotrigine, compared with placebo, as a monotherapy for weight loss in obese adult subjects. METHOD: Forty subjects were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive lamotrigine 200 mg/day or placebo for up to 26 weeks. Eligibility included a body mass index (BMI) of 30 to < 40. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to endpoint (week 26) in subject weight. Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline to endpoint in BMI, percent body fat, serum lipid, and glycosylated hemoglobin values, subject satisfaction with treatment, and quality of life. RESULTS: Mean change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (last observation carried forward) was -6.4+/-10.26 lb and -1.2+/-7.09 lb for lamotrigine and placebo, respectively (p=.0623). Baseline body weight was slightly different between treatment groups (lamotrigine mean=207.9+/-19.88 lb, placebo mean=225.0+/-32.70 lb; p=.0588). There was a statistically significant difference (p=.0421) in mean change in BMI from baseline to endpoint (-1.5+/-2.78 and -0.1+/-1.05 for lamotrigine and placebo, respectively). Subjects were more satisfied with lamotrigine treatment compared with placebo (p=.0065). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in other secondary endpoints. The most frequently reported adverse event was mild-to-moderate headache, occurring in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine demonstrated a statistically significant difference in mean change in BMI and a trend toward a decrease in body weight and was well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of adjunctive topiramate in infants (1–24 months) with refractory partial‐onset seizures: A randomized,multicenter, open‐label phase 1 study

Purpose: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of adjunctive topiramate in infants (1–24 months) with refractory partial‐onset seizures (POS); also to evaluate safety and tolerability of topiramate in the dose range of 3–25 mg/kg/day. Methods: In this open‐label phase 1 study, infants (N = 55) with refractory POS receiving at least one concurrent antiepileptic drug (AED) were enrolled. Infants were stratified by age and randomly assigned to one of four topiramate target dose groups (3‐, 5‐, 15‐, or 25 mg/kg/day). Treatment was initiated at 3 mg/kg/day with titration to the target dose by weekly dose escalation. Topiramate was administered daily in two divided doses as oral liquid (5 mg/ml for infants <9 kg or those who could not tolerate solid foods) or sprinkle capsule (25 mg) formulations. Following seven consecutive days of topiramate administration at the target dose, four blood samples were collected from each infant for pharmacokinetic assessments (predose, 1–3, 4–6, and 8–10 h postdose). Key Findings: Fifty‐five infants (mean [SD] age in months: 11.4 [5.79]) with POS were enrolled, of whom 33% had seizures with or without secondary generalization. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in 35 infants in whom mean plasma topiramate concentration–time profiles demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics (predose topiramate concentrations [C_trough] and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 through 12 h [AUC_{12 h}]) of topiramate over the dose range studied). Apparent steady state oral clearance (CL_ss/F) remained similar across all topiramate target dose groups and was independent of creatinine clearance, age, and weight. Mean values for CL_ss/F were approximately twofold greater in infants receiving concomitant enzyme‐inducing AEDs versus enzyme‐inhibiting AEDs. Topiramate was well tolerated and safety findings were consistent with previous reports in children and adults. Most common treatment emergent adverse events (≥10%) were upper respiratory tract infection, fever, vomiting, somnolence, and anorexia. Significance: In infants (1–24 months), topiramate exhibited linear steady state pharmacokinetics over the dose range 3–25 mg/kg/day, and CL_ss/F of topiramate was independent of dose. Moreover, the concomitant enzyme‐inducing AEDs doubled the clearance of topiramate. Topiramate was generally well tolerated as adjunctive therapy at doses up to 25 mg/kg/day.     

A retrospective assessment of topiramate in children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders

An open-label retrospective study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate in children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders (PDD). Topiramate is a novel antiepileptic drug approved as an adjunctive treatment for seizure disorders. A retrospective chart review was conducted in an outpatient clinic specialized in treating individuals with developmental disabilities, to identify all children and adolescents with PDD who received topiramate. Patients were included if concomitant medications remained unchanged. Treatment response was assessed using the Global Improvement item of the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI-GI), based on a review of medical records and the Conners Parent Scale (CPS), as completed by parents. Fifteen patients were identified (12 male, 3 female; age = 14.7 +/- 3.3 years), including 11 patients with autistic disorder, 2 patients with Asperger's disorder, and 2 patients with PDD not otherwise specified (PDD, NOS). Eight patients (4 patients with autistic disorder, 2 patients with Asperger's disorder, and 2 patients with PDD, NOS) were judged to be responders, as defined by a score of 1 or 2 on the CGI-GI. Treatment duration was 25 +/- 16 weeks, and the mean dose was 235 +/- 88 mg. Differences between baseline and the end-of-trial period were observed in the following CPS subscales: conduct, hyperactivity, and inattention. No differences were noted in the psychosomatic, learning, and anxiety subscales. Three patients discontinued topiramate because of side effects, with 2 patients experiencing cognitive difficulties and 1 patient a skin rash. Topiramate may be beneficial for treating secondary symptoms of PDD, and prospective openlabel studies and double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to assess its efficacy and safety are needed.     

Clinical outcome of adjunctive topiramate treatment in a sample of refractory bipolar patients with comorbid conditions

Topiramate, a novel antiepileptic agent, has shown promise in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Patients attending a bipolar specialty clinic and treated with topiramate were identified by chart review, and data were harvested from systematic prospective assessments used routinely in the clinic. Fourteen patients who received topiramate for an average of 22.4 weeks were identified. All but one of these patients were considered to be highly refractory to standard treatment and 13 met the criteria for at least one comorbid psychiatric condition. Nine of these patients (64%) experienced an increased level of functioning and decrease in symptom severity during treatment with adjunctive topiramate. Eleven patients remained on treatment for longer than 2 weeks. Eight of these patients (73%) experienced a significant improvement in their comorbid conditions. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of > or = 28 (n = 4) experienced a mean weight loss of 29.7 lb while on topiramate. Topiramate appears to be a promising agent for the treatment of bipolar disorder associated with comorbid psychiatric conditions and obesity.     

Topiramate use in alprazolam addiction.

Alprazolam is successful in reducing anxiety but has a high addictive/misuse potential. Topiramate is a novel anticonvulsant which has been used as a mood stabilizer. Other anticonvulsants, such as carbamazepine and valproate, have been used in alcohol and benzodiazepine withdrawal. Topiramate has recently been used in alcohol, cocaine and opiates withdrawal. There has been also one report of topiramate use in midazolam withdrawal. In our case of a patient with recurrent major depressive disorder, subthreshold anxiety disorder and addiction to alprazolam, topiramate appears to be efficient and safe in alprazolam withdrawal.