首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
BACKGROUND: Due to its greater convenience, a combination of uracil and tegafur (referred to as UFT) taken orally is an attractive alternative to continuous intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion. This phase II study assessed the response rate and toxicity profile of the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and UFT in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach. METHODS: Epirubicin (50 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) were administered i.v. to 35 patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma on day 1, and subsequently UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) was administered orally in divided doses for 21 days. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The response rate, time to disease progression, survival and toxic effects were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 35 enrolled patients were assessed subsequently for response. The median number of cycles was four. Thirteen patients (40.6%) showed partial responses, while none showed a complete response. The median time to progression of carcinoma was 20.4 weeks, and the median survival was 37 weeks. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 25% of patients. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was observed in 28% of patients. No treatment-related death was observed. All patients received doses as planned, except for one who required a 75% dose reduction due to nephrotoxicity. Six of 132 cycles were delayed >7 days after four cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and UFT showed anticancer activity against metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, had a tolerable toxicity profile and showed excellent patient compliance.  相似文献   

2.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine when used in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECC) in patients with oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were also determined, and the effect of previous oesophago-gastric surgery or concurrent oesophago-gastric cancer on the absorption and metabolism of capecitabine was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma received up to six cycles of epirubicin (50 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly), cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and capecitabine, the latter administered orally in an intermittent schedule (14 days treatment; 7-day rest period) at 3-weekly intervals. Patients were recruited into one of four escalating dose cohorts (500, 825, 1000 and 1250 mg/m(2) bd). Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level, with DLT assessed on the toxicity of the first cycle only. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analyses was performed over the first 10 h of day 1 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, median age 63 years (range 32-76 years), ECOG performance status < or =2 with locally advanced (10) or metastatic (22) disease were recruited and were evaluable for toxicity. Two of five patients experienced DLT at 1250 mg/m(2) bd with grade II stomatitis (one patient) and grade III diarrhoea with febrile neutropenia (one patient). Cumulative toxicity for all cycles (n = 140) (worst grade per patient) includes grade IV oesophagitis (one patient), grade III diarrhoea (five), grade IV neutropenia with infection (seven), grade II stomatitis (four) and grade IV thrombocytopenia (one). Of 29 patients with evaluable disease, there was one complete response and six partial responses [24% response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 10% to 44%]], a median PFS of 22 weeks (95% CI 17-27 weeks) and median overall survival of 34 weeks (95% CI 19-49 weeks). Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a t(max) of 1-2 h for capecitabine, DFCR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine) and DFUR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine). The C(max) and AUC(0-)( infinity ) for capecitabine, DFCR and DFUR were similar to those observed in previous monotherapy studies of capecitabine taken after food. CONCLUSION: A dose of 1000 mg/m(2) bd of capecitabine is recommended for use on an intermittent schedule in combination with these doses and schedule of epirubicin and cisplatin. This regimen is tolerable and active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. A randomised phase III comparison with ECF is justified.  相似文献   

3.

BACKGROUND:

Biliary tract adenocarcinoma (BTA) is an uncommon tumor with a poor prognosis and no standard, systemic chemotherapy. The combined cisplatin, epirubicin, 5‐fluorouracil, and gemcitabine (PEFG) regimen is an effective, upfront treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. In this study, the authors assessed the activity and safety of this combination regimen in patients with advanced BTA.

METHODS:

PEFG (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 on Day 1; gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8; and 5‐fluorouracil [FU] 200 mg/m2 daily as a continuous infusion) was administered to chemotherapy‐naive patients who had a cytologic or histologic diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic BTA, aged ≤75 years, and a performance status (PS) >60 either until they had evidence progressive disease or for a maximum of 6 months. Tumor size was assessed every 2 months during treatment.

RESULTS:

Between May 1999 and December 2005, 37 patients (62% metastatic) who had a median age of 62 years and a median PS of 90 received the PEFG regimen at the authors' institution. Primary tumor sites were the intrahepatic bile duct in 10 patients (27%), the extrahepatic bile duct in 8 patients (22%), the gallbladder in 12 patients (32%), and the ampulla of Vater in 7 patients (19%). A partial response was observed in 16 patients (43%), and stable disease was observed in 12 patients (32%). The median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months, and the 1‐year OS rate was 52%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, and the 6‐month PFS rate was 67%. The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia in 18% of cycles followed by thrombocytopenia in 9% of cycles, nausea/vomiting in 5% of cycles, and febrile neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, and stomatitis in 2% of cycles.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results demonstrated that PEFG was an active regimen with a manageable toxicity profile for patients with advanced BTA. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.  相似文献   

4.
目的研究FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌的疗效和毒副反应。方法5-Fu500mg/m2,静滴6小时以上,第1~5天;EPI60mg/m2,第1天;DDP25~30mg/m2,第1~3天,21天为一周期,完成两周期及以上者作疗效评定。结果34例患者其中CR2例(5.9%),PR12例(35.3%),SD13例(38.2%),PD7例(20.6%),总有效率41.2%,中位缓解期7.9个月,中位生存期10.8个月,1年生存率40.3%。毒副反应以骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应及脱发为主。结论FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌有效,毒副反应可耐受。  相似文献   

5.
Based on single agent activities and the additive or synergistic effects of three individual drugs in gastric cancer, we performed a phase II study of a new regimen combining epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) for unresectable gastric cancer. The patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer and no history of palliative chemotherapy were eligible for this trial. In total, 40 mg m(-2) epirubicin (reduced to 30 mg m(-2) due to high incidence of febrile neutropaenia; 75%) intravenously (i.v.) over 30 min, followed by 60 mg m(-2) docetaxel i.v. over 1 h, then 75 mg m(-2) cisplatin i.v. over 1 h was administered every 3 weeks. Between January 2002 and February 2003, 30 patients (epirubicin 40 mg m(-2), eight; 30 mg m(-2), 22) were enrolled. The median age was 52 years (range, 33-68). The patients received a median of four cycles (range, 1-8). One patient (3%) achieved a complete response, 13 (43%) showed partial responses, 13 (43%) had stable diseases and three (10%) progressed. The overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 28-66%), and the median duration of response was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-7.0). The median time to progression was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4-5.9), and the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.4). Grade 4 neutropaenia were observed in 41%, and febrile neutropaenia in 32%, out of the patients receiving 30 mg m(-2) of epirubicin. Grade 3 nonhaematological toxicities included nausea, vomiting, anorexia and peripheral neuropathy. In conclusion, EDP is active in gastric cancer, with a manageable and predictable toxicity profile.  相似文献   

6.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is feasible to administer high-dose epirubicin (135 mg m(-2)) combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin every 2 weeks with G-CSF support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Subsequently, the efficacy of the recommended dose of this regimen was tested in a phase II study in patients with relapsed NSCLC. In the initial feasibility study at least 6 patients were entered at each of the 4 dose levels tested. A fixed dose of cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) was given. Epirubicin was administered at 120 mg m(-2) on dose level 1, 135 mg m(-2) on dose level 2 and 3 and 135 mg m(-2) on dose level 4. Patients treated at dose level 3 and 4 received G-CSF support on days 3-12. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks on the first 3 dose levels and every 2 weeks on the fourth dose level. A total of 27 patients were then treated on dose level 4, which appeared to be feasible in the initial study. In the initial study, a total of 86 courses were administered. Haematological toxicity was the principal side effect. None of the patients encountered dose-limiting toxicity in the first course, which confirmed that epirubicin 135 mg m(-2) could be combined with cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) and accelerated by G-CSF support to a 14-day-schedule. In the subsequent phase II study with this schedule, 89 courses were administered. The relative dose intensity of cisplatin and epirubicin was 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. Myelosuppression was frequent with 70% and 63% of patients experiencing WHO grade III or IV leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. 6 cases of febrile neutropenia were observed, with 2 treatment-related deaths. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting, which was grade III in 22% of patients. Renal toxicity grade I and II occurred in 37% and 4% of patients, respectively. 55% of these patients had received prior cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. On an intention-to-treat basis 9 partial responses were recorded in 27 patients (33%; 95% confidence interval, 15%-51%). Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support is a feasible and promising regimen in relapsed NSCLC. Myelosuppression limits the use of this regimen in the second-line setting to a selected group of patients with a good performance status. Since the activity of this regimen is encouraging, it is probably best studied in untreated patients.  相似文献   

7.
21 patients with squamous oesophageal carcinoma were treated with a new regimen designed in our unit and effective in treating gastric adenocarcinoma, consisting of continuous venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for up to 24 weeks (200 mg/m2/day) with epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. 12 patients (57%) had an objective response. The median relapse free period was 7 months, median survival from start of chemotherapy 8.4 months, and median survival from diagnosis, 14 months. Symptomatic improvements were reported by 10/11 patients with pain (91%), 8/9 with anorexia (89%), 8/10 with reflux (80%) and 10/14 with dysphagia (71%). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was reported by 11 patients: 5 had haematological toxicity, 3 vomiting, 2 infection and 1 diarrhoea. One patient developed peripheral neuropathy, 1 renal impairment and another peripheral vascular disease. Following chemotherapy, surgery was attempted in 5 patients. One remains well 3 years on, 2 had macroscopic clearance of tumour but died of postoperative complications. In 2, disease was irresectable. This regimen of moderate toxicity is effective at improving symptoms in the majority of patients. In some patients, tumours are briefly downstaged so that inoperable tumours may become operable.  相似文献   

8.
Although the novel cytidin analogue gemcitabine has shown superior anti-tumour activity than 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, further improvements of therapeutic results are warranted. This goal might be achieved by combining gemcitabine with other active drugs. This trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of such a combination regimen with epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic disease. Seventy patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicentre trial. Patients received 4-weekly courses of a combination regimen consisting of epirubicin 60 mg m(-2) given as intravenous bolus injection on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) infused over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, and G-CSF administered at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously from days 2-6 during each cycle. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by conventional measures, i.e. objective response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response (defined as > or = 50% reduction in pain intensity, > or = 50% reduction in daily analgesic consumption, and/or > or = 20-point improvement in Karnofsky performance status that was sustained for > or = 4 consecutive weeks). Of 66 patients evaluable for objective response, one achieved complete and 13 partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI), 12-33%); 27 additional patients (41%) had stable and 25 (38%) increasing disease. The median time to progression was 3.8 months. Median survival was 7.8 months, and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 21.2%. Out of 60 patients with tumour-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 26 (43%) experienced significant palliation. The median time to achieve a clinical benefit response was 7 weeks, and its median duration was 22 weeks. Chemotherapy was well-tolerated with leukopenia/granulocytopenia representing the most common and dose-limiting side-effect. Gastrointestinal and other subjective toxicities were infrequent and generally rated minor. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine, epirubicin and G-CSF seems to be an effective palliative treatment with only moderate toxic effects in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our results in terms of objective and clinical benefit response, as well as survival seem to suggest an advantage over gemcitabine-monotherapy, though this remains to be confirmed in a randomized trial.  相似文献   

9.

Background:

The conventional treatment options for advanced gastric patients remain unsatisfactory in terms of response rate, response duration, toxicity, and overall survival benefit. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the activity and safety of cetuximab combined with cisplatin and docetaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Methods:

Untreated patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma received cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg m−2 i.v. followed by weekly doses of 250 mg m−2, cisplatin 75 mg m−2 i.v. on day 1, docetaxel 75 mg m−2 i.v. on day 1, every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles, and then cetuximab maintenance treatment was allowed in patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease.

Results:

Seventy-two patients (stomach 81.9% and gastro-oesophageal junction 18.1%; locally advanced disease 4.2%; and metastatic disease 95.8%) were enrolled. The ORR was 41.2% (95% CI, 29.5–52.9). Median time to progression was 5 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4). Median survival time was 9 months (95% CI, 7–11). The most frequent grades 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia (44.4%). No toxic death was observed.

Conclusions:

The addition of cetuximab to the cisplatin/docetaxel regimen improved the ORR of the cisplatin/docetaxel doublet in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but this combination did not improve the TTP and OS. The toxicity of cisplatin/docetaxel chemotherapy was not affected by the addition of cetuximab.  相似文献   

10.
Aim: Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) is a chemosensitive tumour; a randomized study evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bleomycin/epidoxorubicin/cisplatin (BEC) in addition to conventional radiotherapy has resulted in a better disease-free survival in the chemotherapy arm. The bleomycin infusion in the BEC regimen has necessitated hospitalization for the infusion, and resulted in serious pulmonary toxicity. This study has aimed to omit the bleomycin, and test the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin (C) and a higher dose of epidoxorubicin (EPI) in patients with locally advanced UNPC. Methods: Seventy-one patients with locally advanced UNPC were treated with three cycles of C 100 mg/m2 day 1, and EPI 100 mg/m2 day 1 every 3 weeks followed by conventional radiotherapy of 70 Gy. Results: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated. There was only 1-week delay in 14.3% of the patients and no dose modification. Grade III–IV neutropenia occurred in 18.9% of the cycles; none of the patients developed neutropenic fever. No patient progressed during chemotherapy, the complete response rate was 26.8% (95% CI=16.9–38.6) and the partial response rate was 59.1% (95% CI=46.8–70.7) for an objective response rate of 85.9% (95% CI=75.6–93.0) at the end of the three cycles of chemotherapy. After the completion of radiotherapy, the complete response rate increased to 81.7% (95% CI=70.7–89.9) and the objective response increased to 91.5% (95% CI=82.5–96.8). The median disease-free interval and the median survival have not been reached. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates are 53.0% (95% CI=43.7–62.0) and 57.2% (95% CI=48.3–65.2), respectively.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant C and EPI, easily administered in the outpatient setting, is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in the treatment of locally advanced UNPC. Onat, H. et al. (2002). Clinical Oncology 14, 449–454 Copyright 2002 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.  相似文献   

11.
This phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II doses, safety profile, and antitumour activity of a combination regimen of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. Cisplatin and epirubicin were given at fixed doses of 50 and 60 mg m(-2), respectively. The irinotecan dose was escalated at 10 mg m(-2) increments from a starting dose level of 70 mg m(-2). Epirubicin, irinotecan, and their metabolites were measured with HPLC methods. In all, 35 patients received 141 courses of treatment. Irinotecan dose was escalated in seven cohorts up to 130 mg m(-2), and then finally de-escalated to 110 mg m(-2). The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. Nonhaematologic toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and fatigue. Of 34 patients with evaluable disease, one patient had a complete response and nine patients had partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 29.4%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of epirubicin were not affected by the sequence of drug administration. However, the AUCs of irinotecan and its metabolites were increased significantly when irinotecan and epirubicin were administered concurrently. This combination regimen has promising broad antitumour activity, and will be further evaluated in phase II studies in multiple tumour types.  相似文献   

12.
目的:评价表柔比星、氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙以及顺铂(ECF—L)联合化疗方案对无法手术切除或术后复发的晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性。方法:本研究入选对象为经病理学证实的具有至少一个可测量病灶的原发性或转移至其他部位的无法手术切除的胃癌患者。所用化疗方案为:表柔比星50mg/m^2第一天,亚叶酸钙200mg/m^2第1—3天,氟尿嘧啶600mg/m^2第1—3天,以及顺铂20mg/m^2第1-3天静脉给药。3周为1周期,3个周期为一次疗程。治疗过程中允许必要的支持治疗。结果:2000年3月—2001年8月期间,各院共有79例患者入选并接受化疗(16例为Ⅲ期,63例为Ⅳ期;37例为初治患者,42例为复治患者;53例为术后复发患者)。最终66例患者可以评价疗效,其中CR4例、PR18例,总缓解率为33.3%(22/66);初治患者缓解率为36.7%(11/30),复治患者缓解率为30.6%(11/36),具有淋巴软组织转移的患者其缓解率为50.0%(15/30)。除缓解病例外,NC患者25例,PD患者19例,以及治疗过程中出组患者13例(出组率16.4%,13/79)。化疗过程中发生的毒副反应(WH0标准)Ⅲ度-Ⅳ度主要为骨髓抑制20.1%、脱发5.1%和恶心、呕吐2.3%。结论:本研究提示ECF—L方案可以安全地用于治疗手术无法切除的晚期胃癌患者。  相似文献   

13.
Potential synergistic interaction between gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in pancreatic cancer have been described previously. The maximum-tolerated dose in this trial was GEM 1000 mg m(-2) and EPI 45 mg m(-2). Median time to progression was 5.1 months and median survival time 7.4 months. This combination appears well tolerated and shows promising clinical activity.  相似文献   

14.
Irinotecan, mitomycin and cisplatin all demonstrate activity in gastro-oesophageal cancers. This novel combination was administered to outpatients with previously untreated inoperable gastro-oesophageal or pancreatic cancer, in a 28-day cycle. A total of 26 out of 31 patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer and 12 out of 14 patients with pancreatic cancer have been treated with this combination, and were evaluable for response. The overall response rates for patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer was 42%, with a median survival of 9.5 months. In patients with pancreatic cancer, the overall response rate was 42% with a median survival of 8 months. There was a statistically significant increase in survival between those patients who achieved a stable disease response and those who achieved either a partial response or complete response. The toxicity profiles for both cancers were virtually identical. There were five treatment-related deaths, and a high admission rate (42%). Thus irinotecan, mitomycin and cisplatin is a new combination with activity in inoperable upper gastro-oesophageal cancers, but with a high toxicity profile. Future developments include reducing the dose of irinotecan and number of cycles of therapy to four.  相似文献   

15.
明静  蒋新建 《陕西肿瘤医学》2010,18(8):1542-1544
目的:观察多西紫杉醇联合表阿霉素及环磷酰胺治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效与不良反应。方法:采用多西紫杉醇联合表阿霉素及环磷酰胺治疗56例复发或转移的晚期乳腺癌患者,多西紫杉醇75mg/m2,d1,表阿霉素50mg/m2,d1,环磷酰胺500mg/m2,d1,21天为1周期,连续治疗2周期。结果:56例患者TEC方案治疗2周期后CR7例,PR22例,总有效率为51.8%。最常见不良反应为骨髓抑制、消化道反应及脱发,本组无一例发生过敏反应,其不良反应可耐受。结论:TEC方案治疗晚期乳腺癌可作为晚期乳腺癌的一线治疗方案。  相似文献   

16.
Purpose. To investigate the activity of the combination of gemcitabine (G) plus epirubicin (E) and taxol (T), (GET), in metastatic breast cancer, to evaluate the feasibility of this regimen as induction before high dose chemotherapy and to study the pharmacokinetic interactions of these three drugs. Patients and methods. Metastatic breast cancer patients, with bidimensionally measurable disease were eligible. Treatment consisted of G 1000mg/sqm days 1 and 4 plus E 90 mg/sqm day 1 plus T 175mg/sqm/3h day 1, every 21 days. After six courses of GET, patients aged less than 60 years, in complete or partial remission or stable disease entered a programme of high dose chemotherapy (HDCT), as consolidation treatment. Results. Thirtysix patients were included in this study. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 64% of the patients, with four episodes of febrile neutropenia; 39% of the patients experienced mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy; grade 2 and 3 mucositis occurred respectively in 9 (25%) and 6 (17%) patients. The overall response rate to GET was 92% (95% CI, 77.53%–98.25%); CR 31% and PR 61%. After six courses of GET, 25 patients received HDCT, leading to an overall response rate of 96% with 58% CR. At a median follow up of 25 months (range 8–39), 13 out of 36 patients are progression free and 26 alive. Median progression free survival is 21 months, while median overall survival has not yet been reached. The pharmacokinetic data show that G does not influence the interactions between E and T, while gemcitabine kinetics remains unchanged. Conclusions. The results of the present study indicate that the addition of G to E plus T as front line treatment for advanced breast cancer is well tolerated with an ORR of 92%. On the basis of the high activity and interesting progression free and overall survival rates, the GET combination deserves further evaluation in randomized trials.  相似文献   

17.
目的:探讨EOX化疗方案(表柔比星+奥沙利铂+卡培他滨)治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及毒副反应.方法:经病理学证实的晚期胃癌共23例,采用EOX方案化疗:表柔比星50mg/m2,d1;奥沙利铂130mg/m2静脉滴注,d1;卡培他滨1250mg/m2,每天分2次口服,d1-14,3周为1个周期,完成6个周期或直至肿瘤进展或毒副反应无法耐受即治疗停止.每2周期评价疗效及毒副反应.结果:23例均可评价疗效.CR 1例,PR 10例,SD 6例,PD 6例,总有效率(RR)为47.8%,疾病控制率(DCR)为73.9%.中位疾病无进展时间(mPFS)6.4个月,中位总生存期(mOS) 10.6个月,1年生存率为43.5%.其中初治患者总有效率(RR)为56.2%,中位疾病无进展时间(mPFS) 7.1个月,中位总生存期11.2个月.毒副反应主要为血液学毒性及胃肠道反应,手足综合症发生率不高.结论:EOX方案治疗晚期胃癌有较高的有效率,患者耐受性良好,生活质量高,是较理想的晚期胃癌一线治疗方案.  相似文献   

18.
The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of epirubicin and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase I study was performed with the combination of escalating doses of epirubicin intravenously on day 1 and a fixed dose of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 of a 21 -day cycle. Eighteen patients were included in the phase I part of the study before the maximum tolerated dose was found. Dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. The phase II part of the study was continued with epirubicin 100 mg m(-2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1125 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Forty-three chemotherapy-naive patients were included. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 26-75). Most patients (74%) were in stage IV. Granulocytopenia CTC grade 4 occurred in 32.5% and thrombocytopenia grade 4 in 11.6% of cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients. Non-haematological toxicity was mainly mucositis CTC grade 2 and 3 in 35% of patients. The tumour response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35-63%). The median survival time for the patients was 42 weeks (95% CI 13-69).  相似文献   

19.
多西紫杉醇联合表阿霉素治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的疗效观察   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的:了解多西紫杉醇加表阿霉素对局部晚期乳腺癌患者进行新辅助化疗的疗效及不良反应。方法:对我院治疗的63例均采用多西紫杉醇加表阿霉素(DE方案:多西紫杉醇75 mg/m2d1,表阿霉素75 mg/m2d1)化疗的局部晚期乳腺癌患进行回顾性分析,每位患者进行2-4疗程的化疗,结束后评估疗效及不良反应。结果:总有效率(CR+PR)为68.3%,完全缓解(CR)8例,部分缓解(PR)35例,无变化(SD)13例,进展(PD)7例。术后中位随访24个月,死亡6例,复发及转移13例,健在44例。结论:多西紫杉醇联合表阿霉素术前化疗可以使患者降期,使原发灶缩小,以增加手术机会,提高生存率。  相似文献   

20.
To test the feasibility and efficacy of epirubicin and ifosfamide added to first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel in a phase II randomised clinical trial. Patients with histologically proven epithelial ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive first-line polychemotherapy with cisplatin/paclitaxel/epirubicin (CEP) or cisplatin/paclitaxel/ifosfamide (CIP) for six cycles every 21 days. Two hundred and eight patients were randomised between the two treatment arms and the median number of cycles per patient was six. Toxicity was predominantly haematological with both regimens; however, anaemia, leucopaenia, neutropaenic fever and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and transfusion were significantly more frequent in the CIP treatment arm. Response rates were 85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77-93%) in the CIP arm and 90% (95% CI 84-96%) in the CEP arm; complete response rates were 48 and 52%. After a median follow-up of 82 months, median overall survival (OS) was 51 and 65 months; 5-year survival rates were respectively 43 and 50%. In this clinical trial, both regimens showed good efficacy, but toxicity was heavier with the CIP regimen. Considering that more than 50% of patients were suboptimally debulked after the first surgery, OS seems to be longer than is commonly reported. This unexpected finding might be a consequence of the close surgical surveillance and aggressive chemotherapeutic approach.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号