Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of surgical therapy based on a topographic/anatomical classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Because of its borderline location between the stomach and esophagus, the choice of surgical strategy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is controversial. METHODS: In a large single-center series of 1,002 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, the choice of surgical approach was based on the location of the tumor center or tumor mass. Treatment of choice was esophagectomy for type I tumors (adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus) and extended gastrectomy for type II tumors (true carcinoma of the cardia) and type III tumors (subcardial gastric cancer infiltrating the distal esophagus). Demographic data, morphologic and histopathologic tumor characteristics, and long-term survival rates were compared among the three tumor types, focusing on the pattern of lymphatic spread, the outcome of surgery, and prognostic factors in patients with type II tumors. RESULTS: There were marked differences in sex distribution, associated intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus, tumor grading, tumor growth pattern, and stage distribution between the three tumor types. The postoperative death rate was higher after esophagectomy than extended total gastrectomy. On multivariate analysis, a complete tumor resection (R0 resection) and the lymph node status (pN0) were the dominating independent prognostic factors for the entire patient population and in the three tumor types, irrespective of the surgical approach. In patients with type II tumors, the pattern of lymphatic spread was primarily directed toward the paracardial, lesser curvature, and left gastric artery nodes; esophagectomy offered no survival benefit over extended gastrectomy in these patients. CONCLUSION: The classification of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction into type I, II, and III tumors shows marked differences between the tumor types and provides a useful tool for selecting the surgical approach. For patients with type II tumors, esophagectomy offers no advantage over extended gastrectomy if a complete tumor resection can be achieved.     

Karzinom des ösophagogastralen Übergangs und Barrett-Ösophagus

From a clinical and biological point of view, the term "adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction" (AEG) encompasses several distinct tumor entities. The topographic anatomic classification into adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG I), true carcinoma of the cardia (AEG II), and subcardiac gastric cancer (AEG III) also reflects differences regarding the pathogenesis of these tumors and is increasingly accepted worldwide. Associated Barrett's esophagus, which usually develops as a consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux, can be documented in practically all patients with AEG I tumors and constitutes the most important precancerous lesion. A metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence has been confirmed for these tumors. Barrett's esophagus is thus considered a model for studies on carcinogenesis and the prevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Its pathogenetic role in AEG II and III tumors must, however, be discussed differently. Our own experience shows that pathogenetic mechanisms similar to those in AEG I tumors may be present in up to 30% of tumors classified as AEG II. The majority of AEG II tumors, however, show morphologic, biologic and pathogenetic similarities with AEG III tumors and proximal gastric cancer.     

���г�ʳ��θ��ϲ��ٰ���ʽѡ��

近年来,食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)发病率呈上升趋势,手术为该病的主要治疗手段,但目前国人对该病概念较模糊,导致手术选择(包括手术入路、切除范围、淋巴结清扫范围等方面)多样,甚至存在争议。对肿瘤进行充分的分型、分期评估,遵循个体化治疗原则,是为病人选择科学合理的术式的前提和基础。对于SiewertI型AEG病人可行经胸经裂孔食管下段切除术、经颈、胸、腹三切口手术等;SiewertⅡ型AEG病人术式选择和手术入路存在较多的争议,经腹行全胃切除+腹部及纵隔淋巴结清扫被认为是进展期SiewertⅡ型AEG的首选术式,只有全胃切除才能保证进展期AEG足够无瘤切缘和淋巴结清扫范围,早期SiewertⅡ型AEG病人可行近端胃切除及相应淋巴结清扫;Ⅲ型AEG则按近端胃癌手术原则处理。进展期AEG是否联合脾切除尚存争议。目前不建议行常规脾切除术,只有在脾门受侵或有明确的淋巴结转移时,才考虑行脾切除。     

Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of disease in patients with pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a limited surgical approach. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Radical esophagectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy is widely advocated as the treatment of choice in patients with early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. This approach, however, is associated with substantial complications and long-term side effects. The extent of resection necessary to achieve cure in such patients is not clear. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with pT1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus underwent transmediastinal or transthoracic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Twenty-four patients with uT1N0 tumors underwent a limited resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction, regional lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction by interposition of an isoperistaltic pedicled jejunal segment. The two groups were compared for extent and multicentricity of the primary tumor and associated high-grade dysplasia, pattern of lymph node metastases, complications, deaths, and outcome of surgical treatment. RESULTS: Multicentric tumor growth or associated high-grade dysplasia was observed in 60.6% of the resection specimens. Complete resection of the tumor and the entire segment with intestinal metaplasia was achieved in all patients, irrespective of the surgical approach. Patients undergoing limited resection had fewer complications. Lymph node metastases or micrometastases were present in none of the 38 patients with tumors limited to the mucosa (pT1a) versus 10 of the 56 (17.9%) patients with tumors invading the submucosa (pT1b). Distant lymph node metastases occurred only in patients with more than three positive regional lymph nodes. Lymph node metastases were prognostic, but the pT1a/pT1b category and the surgical approach were not. The mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index after limited resection did not differ from that of healthy controls: 20 of the 24 patients were completely asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus, resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction, with regional lymphadenectomy and jejunal interposition, is an attractive limited surgical alternative to radical esophagectomy.     

The pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is rapidly increasing, and the extent of lymphadenectomy for such tumors remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the pattern of dissemination by examination of all lymph nodes retrieved from resected tumors of the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: The endoscopic and pathologic reports of patients who underwent RO resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction between January 1996 and November 1999 were examined. Patients with type 1 tumors (distal esophagus) underwent subtotal esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy. Patients with type 2 (gastric cardia) tumors underwent transhiatal D2 total gastro-esophagectomy. Lymph node groups were dissected from the main specimens and examined separately. RESULTS: One hundred and four type 1 and 48 type 2 tumors were studied. Median nodal recovery was 23 lymph nodes (type 1, 22 lymph nodes; type 2, 23 lymph nodes). Seventy-eight percent of the type 1 tumors with nodal metastases had dissemination in both the abdomen and mediastinum. The common abdominal sites were the paracardiac and the left gastric stations. Within the mediastinum, paraesophageal, paraaortic and tracheobronchial metastases were more often encountered. Type 2 tumors had positive lymph nodes most frequently in the left and right paracardiac, lesser curve (N1 group), and left gastric (N2 group) territories. Nodal status correlated with increasing depth of tumor invasion (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of nodal dissemination for cardia tumors concurs with that described by other studies. The current definition of nodal fields in the abdomen and mediastinum for esophageal tumors relates to experience with squamous carcinomas. Our results demonstrate a different pattern of dissemination for junctional esophageal adenocarcinomas. The nodal stations to be resected in radical lymphadenectomies for such tumors should be redefined.     

食管胃结合部腺癌的外科治疗

食管胃结合部癌的发病率呈持续上升的趋势,尤其是在西方国家。外科手术切除仍然是治疗食管胃结合部癌的基石。由于肿瘤位于食管和胃的结合部,所以对其定义、分型、分期和手术方式都还存在一些争议。Siewert分型是目前认可程度最高的分型方法。对于进展期SiewertⅠ型食管胃结合部癌,其生物学特性和外科治疗方案更接近于食管癌;对于进展期SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型食管胃结合部癌,外科治疗方案更接近于胃癌。而对于早期食管胃结合部癌,可以采用内镜切除或者缩小手术。     

Surgical treatment of Barrett carcinoma

Barrett-carcinoma is a type of adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the cardia. Barrett-esophagus is defined by the histologic presence of specialized epithelium with intestinal metaplasia. As a consequence Barrett-carcinoma has a close relationship to the adenocarcinoma of the cardia and is very often part of the cardiacarcinoma type I. The aim of the surgical therapy is a radical R0-resection of the tumor including the lymphatic drainage area. This aim is accomplished among different authors by different surgical concepts. One is the radical transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy in the lower mediastinum and the upper abdominal compartments. The other concept is a transthoracic en-bloc esophagectomy. Both resection procedures are usually completed by gastric pull up reconstruction. Currently a sophisticated preoperative staging is followed by distinguished indication and therapy depending on tumor status, risk factors of the patient and on the international classification of the cardia carcinoma (Siewert). When a R0-resection is impossible, a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy should be performed.     

食管-胃结合部腺癌根治术的争议与评价

目前,食管-胃结合部腺癌（AEG）作为一类不同于食管癌和胃癌的独立疾病的临床观点已为多数学者所接受。然而,有关AEG根治术的手术径路、食管胃切除范围、淋巴结清扫范围等问题仍存在争议。临床上应综合病人全身情况、AEG类型、食管浸润范围、cTNM分期、术者的经验和技术条件等因素,平衡手术的安全性和彻底性,选择合理的个体化根治手术方案。     

Is adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia a distinct entity independent of subcardial carcinoma?

Cardia carcinoma has been defined diversely. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cardia carcinoma should be categorized as a distinct entity independent of subcardial carcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma involving the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) with the tumor center within 5 cm of the EGJ. Adenocarcinomas of the EGJ were classified into Type I, Type II, and Type III according to Siewert's criteria. There was only one Type I adenocarcinoma, and it was associated with Barrett's esophagus. No tumors had their center between 1 cm and 2 cm proximal to the EGJ. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis were compared among patients with Type II adenocarcinomas ( n = 31), patients with Type III adenocarcinomas ( n = 33), and patients with adenocarcinomas in the upper third of the stomach not invading the EGJ ( n = 153). Siewert's Type II adenocarcinoma was associated with a higher male/female ratio and with higher incidences of well-demarcated appearance and differentiated histology than carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach without esophageal invasion. Lymph nodes along the greater curvature and parapyloric nodes were rarely involved in Type II tumors. Within the pT2 category, patients with Siewert's Type II tumors showed a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and a significantly lower survival rate than did patients with tumors of the upper third of the stomach without esophageal invasion. In conclusion, cardia carcinoma, appropriately defined as adenocarcinoma with its epicenter between 1 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the EGJ, should be categorized as a distinct entity.     

ʳ��-θ��ϲ��ٰ�������������������

??Controversy and evaluation of the radical resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction SUN Yi-hong, SHEN Zhen-bin. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Corresponding author: SUN Yi-hong, E-mail: sun. yihong@zs-hospital. sh.cn
Abstract The majority of scholars have agreed that the adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is an independent tumor entity, which is different from squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric adenocarcinoma. But there are still many controversies about the surgical approaches, procedures of resection, and extent of lymph nodes dissection. Clinically, surgical procedure should be tailored individually according to the general condition of the patient, type of AEG, extent of esophageal infiltration, cTNM stage and experiences of the surgeons to get a good balance between the surgical safety and degree of radical resection.     

Surgical treatment of the adenocarcinoma of the cardia

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction?should be classified into adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (Type I), true carcinoma of the cardia (Type II), and subcardial carcinoma (Type III) in a pathogenic and therapeutic point of view. During a 15-year period (1995 - 2009), 117 surgical laparotomies for adenocarcinoma of the cardia were performed in elective surgery in the First Clinic of General Surgery UHC "Mother Theresa" in Tirana. The classification was performed by summarizing the information obtained from oral contrast radiography, endoscopy, and intra-operative findings. There were 54 (46%) patients of Type I, 40 (34%) of Type II and 23 (20%) of Type III . Surgical procedures included "subtotal esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy", "distal esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy", "total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy".?All anastomoses performed in the above mentioned procedures were hand sewn. Thirty-seven patients (32%) resulted inoperable at the time of laparotomy and 80 (68%) patients were treated with curative intent, those resulting in an operability index of 68%. The overall morbidity and mortality rates of 29% and 4,3% respectively.     

Adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction.

BACKGROUND: The border between the esophagus and stomach gives rise to many discrepancies in the current literature regarding the etiology, classification and surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising at the esophago-gastric junction. We have consequently used the AEG-criteria (adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction) for classification and have based the selection of the surgical approach on the anatomic topographic subclassification. METHODS: In the following we report an analysis of a large and homogeneously classified population of 1602 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, with an emphasis on the surgical approach, the pattern of lymphatic spread, the outcome after surgical treatment and the prognostic factors. Demographic data, morphologic and histopathologic tumor characteristics, and long-term survival rates were compared among the three tumor subclassifiations. RESULTS: The study confirms the marked differences in sex distribution, associated specialized intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus, tumor grading, tumor growth pattern, lymphatic spread, and stage between the three tumor entities. The degree of resection and lymph node status were the dominating independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The data show no significant differences of long-term survival after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy and extended total gastrectomy in these patients. CONCLUSION: The classification of adenocarcinomas of the esophago-gastric junction in three types, AEG type I, type II and type III shows marked differences between the tumor entities and is recommended for selection of a proper surgical approach. Complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are associated with good long-term prognosis. Better surgical management and standardized procedures will improve the outcome also of patients who need to undergo more radical surgery, i.e. abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy.     

Limited surgical resection and jejunal interposition for early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus

The need for radical resection and extensive lymphadenectomy for early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus has recently been challenged. Limited surgical resection and endoscopic mucosal ablation techniques are increasingly proposed and used as less invasive alternatives. Available data indicate that a limited resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction with jejunal interposition is associated with less morbidity and mortality, provides similar oncologic results, and offers a better quality of life as compared with radical esophagectomy. In contrast, endoscopic ablation and mucosectomy techniques are still plagued by high tumor recurrence rates, particularly in patients with incomplete removal of the underlying Barrett's mucosa, multicentric tumors, or tumors invading into the submucosa. Attention to technical details of limited resection and jejunal interposition is, however, required to avoid complications, poor functional results, and the need for reintervention.     

�����뼼������ ���ʳ��θ��ϲ��ٰ��ۺ�����ˮƽ

目前,食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)作为一类不同于食管癌和胃癌的独立疾病的临床观点已为多数学者所接受。然而,有关AEG根治术的手术径路、切除范围、淋巴结清扫范围等问题仍存在争议。外科医师应重视临床研究结果,同时提高手术技巧。在循证医学的指导下,应综合病人全身情况、AEG类型、cTNM分期等因素,开展多学科团队治疗模式,制定合理的个体化综合治疗方案。     

Staging by immediate preoperative laparoscopy in adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and cardia

Accurate preoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia is critical to select the proper treatment in the individual patients, i.e., resection, neoadjuvant therapy, or endoscopic palliation. Aim of this study was to assess the role of laparoscopy in detecting intra-abdominal metastatic spread in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia. Between November 1995 and May 1998, 45 patients with histologically-proven adenocarcinoma of the cardia--without any previous treatment--and negative or inconclusive findings at computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) underwent staging laparoscopy at the same session of the planned surgical resection. The mean operative time of the procedure was 25 minutes (range 15-55 min). Laparoscopy led to change the therapeutic approach in five patients (11.1%): three patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and one with a liver metastasis undetected at preoperative imaging studies did not have resection; conversely, one individual with liver hemangioma simulating a metastatic mass at CT underwent esophagogastric resection. In patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia, laparoscopy is useful to increase accuracy of detection of metastases; when performed as the first step of a planed resection, it avoids unnecessary laparotomies and does not increase the complexity of preoperative evaluation.     

Adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and "gastric cardia" are predominantly esophageal carcinomas

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia are defined by the relationship of its epicenter to the gastro-esophageal junction, which is presently defined as the end of the tubular esophagus. We have recently suggested that the true gastro-esophageal junction is best defined by the proximal limit of gastric oxyntic mucosa. AIM: To reclassify adenocarcinomas of this region by the relationship of the tumor to the proximal limit of gastric oxyntic mucosa. METHODS: Seventy-four patients who had esophago-gastrectomy for adenocarcinomas in this region were classified as adenocarcinoma of distal esophagus (38 patients) and gastric cardia (36 patients) by present criteria. The epithelial type at the epicenter and distal edge of these tumors was assessed. RESULTS: The epicenter of the tumor in 64 patients with noncircumferential tumors had squamous (5 cases), cardiac (21 cases), oxynto-cardiac (4 cases), and intestinal (Barrett-type) (34 cases) epithelia. None had gastric oxyntic mucosa. Of the 10 patients with circumferential tumors, 7 had cardiac or oxynto-cardiac epithelium at the distal tumor edge. CONCLUSIONS: If the gastro-esophageal junction is defined histologically as the proximal limit of oxyntic mucosa, 71/74 patients would be classified as adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. The other 3 patients were questionable as to gastric or esophageal origin. We suggest that this reclassification based on the proposed new definition of the gastro-esophageal junction provides an explanation for the epidemiologic relationship that exists between adenocarcinoma of the "gastric cardia" and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.     

Distinct Recurrence Pattern and Outcome of Adenocarcinoma of the Gastric Cardia in Comparison with Carcinoma of Other Regions of the Stomach

Background Carcinoma arising in the cardioesophageal junction is a distinct clinical entity compared with tumors located in other regions of the stomach. The prognosis for adenocarcinoma of the upper stomach is considered to be relatively poorer than carcinomas of the more distal stomach. We have therefore investigated patients with carcinoma of the gastric cardia in order to evaluate the underlying cause of this poor prognosis. Materials and Methods Clinicopathologic features and postoperative prognosis of 101 patients with carcinoma of the cardia were evaluated and compared with findings on 1884 patients with tumors in other regions of the stomach. Results Tumors of the cardia had a mean size of 6.8 cm, which was significantly larger than the mean size of 5.9 cm for tumors found in the middle- and lower third of the stomach. The incidence of serosal invasion, lymph node metastasis, and lymphatic and blood vessel invasion was higher in association with adenocarcinoma of the cardia than with adenocarcinoma in remaining parts of the stomach. In the analysis of patients who had undergone curative resection, the 5-year survival rates were 61.6, 79.1, and 82.6% in patients with carcinoma of the cardia, upper one-third, and remaining middle- and lower one-third of the stomach, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis indicated that adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia is an independent prognostic factor. With regard to the site of recurrence, both lymph node and hematogenous recurrence were observed more frequently in the cardia than in the remaining parts of the stomach. Conclusions Our data indicate that the prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia is extremely poor. To improve their prognosis, new treatments in addition to gastrectomy with extensive lymph node dissection are needed.     

Total Thoracic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Background: Many current methods of esophageal resection have drawbacks that result in inadequate proximal resection, inadequate lymphadenectomy, and difficult gastric and splenic access. We describe a technique that allows reliable and safe access to the chest, abdomen, and neck.

Study Design: From 1988 to 1995, 113 patients (82 men; mean age 65.3 ± 4.5 years) with carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction (middle third in 34, lower third in 41, and cardia in 38) underwent total thoracic esophagectomy. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 71 (62.8%), squamous cell carcinoma in 32 (28.3%), and undifferentiated carcinoma in 10 (8.9%) of the patients; 57 tumors (50.5%) were stage III. The esophagus and stomach were mobilized through a left thoracoabdominal incision. After completion of the esophageal resection, the fundus of the stomach was sutured to the esophageal stump to allow later delivery of the stomach into the neck. The esophagogastric anastomosis was performed with continuous single-layer absorbable suture through a left oblique cervical incision.

Results: The mean duration of the operation was 309.2 ± 47.9 minutes. Hospital stay ranged from 5 to 49 days (median, 12 days). The perioperative mortality rate was 4.4%. Anastomotic leak occurred in six patients (5.3%), one of whom died. The proximal resection margin was microscopically free of tumor in all cases, and with a minimum followup period of 18 months, there has been no anastomotic recurrence in any patient. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 63.4% ± 4.9%, at 3 years 41.4% ± 5.9%, and at 5 years 22.7% ± 6.3%.

Conclusions: Total thoracic esophagectomy through the left chest with a separate left cervical incision allows clear access to the esophagus and stomach and good tumor clearance. This procedure may be performed with a low rate of anastomotic leakage, a very low mortality rate, and no anastomotic tumor recurrence.     

Differential Pathologic Variables and Outcomes across the Spectrum of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Background  

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) as described by Siewert et al. is classified as one entity in the latest (7th Edition) American Joint Cancer Committee/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) manual, compared with the previous mix of esophageal and gastric staging systems. The origin of AEG tumors, esophageal or gastric, and their biology remain controversial, particularly for AEG type II (cardia) tumors.     

ʳ��θ��ϲ��ٰ����������״������

??Current status and controversy of surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction CAO Hui ??ZHAO En-hao. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
Corresponding author: CAO Hui, E-mail: caohuishcn@hotmail.com
Abstract The incidence of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been an alarming rise worldwide during recent decades. Due to the anatomic location of the tumor, there are still many controversies about surgical approaches, regional lymphadenectomy, extents of esophageal and gastric resection, efficacy of minimally invasive surgery, etc. Standard and individual therapy strategies, based on precisely pre-operative classification and staging, should be selected cautiously according to the basic principles of radical surgery in malignant tumor. A multidisciplinary team will be essential for optimal diagno.sis and management in the near future.