The Potential Effects of New Stent Platforms for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes

Coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by extensive atherosclerosis, longer lesions, and diffuse distal disease. Consequently, these patients have worse outcomes after coronary revascularization, regardless of the modality used. Traditionally, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been regarded as more effective than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with DM, likely because of more complete revascularization and protection against disease progression in the bypass segment. Revascularization with balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents, and first-generation drug-eluting stents have all been shown to be inferior to CABG in patients with DM. Current professional society guidelines reflect these findings, strongly recommending CABG over PCI in this setting. Newer stent platforms, however, have challenged this notion. The use of thinner struts, biocompatible polymer coating, and newer antiproliferative agents have improved the rates of cardiovascular events in patients with DM revascularized percutaneously. Since the publication of current guidelines, new studies suggested acceptable outcomes in patients with DM revascularized with second-generation drug-eluting stents, even though these conclusions are drawn from small subgroup analyses or nonrandomized studies. Robust registry data suggest similar mortality with lower rates of stroke after PCI compared with surgery, at the expense of increased rates of repeat revascularization. If complete revascularization can be achieved, similar rates of myocardial infarction are also observed. Therefore, contemporary revascularization in patients with DM with multivessel coronary artery disease should involve a multidisciplinary approach, in which interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons involve their patients to individualize treatment choices, and balance the risks and effectiveness of each modality.     

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention for Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: A Plethora of Different Technologies

Chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) remains a common cardiovascular condition resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. With an aging population, increasing trends for both primary (degenerative) and secondary (functional) MR have become apparent. Although the gold standard remains surgical intervention with mitral valve repair/replacement, comorbid conditions have steered the development of less invasive technologies to mitigate perioperative surgical risk. Transcatheter mitral valve repair using a percutaneous edge-to-edge technique is the most widely available choice at present. However, other transcatheter mitral valve repair techniques such as annuloplasty and chordal implantation are notable alternatives. Moreover, emerging technologies in transcatheter mitral valve replacement are rapidly establishing their roles in the field of chronic severe MR therapy. Hence, it is imperative to understand the indications and limitations of these various transcatheter mitral valve interventions to provide the best and most up-to-date clinical care for patients. This review will outline current evidence and patient selection criteria for such device-based therapies.     

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Complex Calcific Coronary Lesions Utilizing Orbital Atherectomy Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD), often with severe calcification, is present in up to 75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Management of CAD in such patients is challenging. Orbital atherectomy (OA) is an effective treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is limited data on the use of OA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific CAD patients prior to TAVR (OA PCI + TAVR).MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients with moderate/severe calcific CAD and moderate/severe AS who underwent staged OA PCI + TAVR at one high-volume institution. Data were analyzed to assess the 1-year major adverse cardiac events after index OA PCI [MACE: death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI)].ResultsThere were 18 patients (mean age of 82) treated with staged OA PCI + TAVR, and of those, 10 (56%) were male, 7 (39%) Caucasian, and 11 (61%) Hispanic/Latino. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 49% and congestive heart failure was present in 12 patients (67%). There were no angiographic complications (0%), stent thrombosis (0%), or stroke events (0%). The 30-day and 1-year MACE rates were 5.6% (0% death, 0% TLR, 5.6% MI) and 17% (0% death, 11% TLR, and 17% MI [all non-Q-wave MI]), respectively.ConclusionsIn this single-center observational cohort series, patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions treated with OA prior to TAVR had low rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year. The results demonstrate the feasibility and safety of OA for the treatment of complex calcific coronary lesions prior to TAVR. An up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD is also provided.Table of contents summaryThere is limited data on the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific coronary artery disease (CAD) patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and 1-year outcome of OA PCI pre-TAVR in patients with complex CAD and severe aortic stenosis (AS). We also aimed to provide a brief up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD. This retrospective cohort study found that OA is feasible and safe for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions before TAVR, resulting in acceptable 30-day and 1-year outcomes.     

Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Disease Demystified

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive chronic disease characterized by exacerbations and periods of remission. It is estimated that up to 20% to 30% of those with AF also have coronary artery disease (CAD), and 5% to 15% will require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In patients with concomitant AF and CAD, management remains challenging and requires a careful and balanced assessment of the risk of bleeding against the anticipated impact on ischemic outcomes (AF-related stroke and systemic embolism, as well as ischemic coronary events). Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is indicated for the prevention of AF-related stroke and systemic embolism, whereas antiplatelet therapy is indicated for the prevention of coronary events. Each offers a relative efficacy benefit (dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] is more effective than OAC alone in reducing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic coronary events in a population with acute coronary syndromes [ACS]), but with a relative compromise (DAPT is significantly inferior to OAC for the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in an AF population at increased risk of stroke). The purpose of this review is to explore the current evidence and rationale for antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with both AF and CAD. Specifically, there is a focus on how to best tailor the therapeutic choices (OAC and antiplatelet therapy) to individual patients based on their underlying coronary presentation.     

Coronary Angiography and Revascularization Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in British Columbia: Incidence,Predictors and Longer-term Outcomes

Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is established treatment for subsets of coronary artery disease (CAD). Observational data have characterised significant progression of native coronary as well as graft vessel disease during longer-term follow-up, potentially reducing the benefit of CABG. We sought to assess longer-term outcomes following CABG by determining rates of repeat coronary angiography, revascularization procedures, and survival.

Acute Coronary Syndromes and Heart Failure Critical Care Units Utilization and Outcomes in Teaching and Community Hospitals: A National Population-Based Analysis

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and heart failure (HF) are the leading diagnoses in patients admitted to critical care units (CCUs). Little is known about the differences between CCU resource use and outcomes across hospital types. The Canadian Institute for Health Information was used to identify patients hospitalized with primary diagnoses of ACS or HF. CCUs were categorized as teaching, large community, medium community, and small community hospitals. Outcomes included CCU rates of admission, use of critical care therapy/procedures, and in-hospital mortality. Among 204,900 patients hospitalized with ACS or HF, 73,338 (35.8%, hospital range 0% to 81.4%) were admitted to CCUs, and it varied across hospital types: 41.0% in teaching, 30.0% in large, 45.4% in medium, and 30.9% in small community hospitals (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients admitted to CCUs who received critical care therapies in teaching, large, medium, and small hospitals were as follows: 73.6%, 50.9%, 24.6%, and 8.8% (P < 0.0001). Compared with the in-hospital mortality rate for patients admitted to CCUs in teaching hospitals (8.2%), outcomes were worse for CCU patients in large (11.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.90), medium (10.5%, aOR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.27-1.92), and small community hospitals (9.2%, aOR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.10). Patients admitted with ACS or HF to teaching hospital CCUs had a higher observed use of critical care therapies and lower mortality compared with community hospitals. These differences highlight the need to examine differences in CCU admission thresholds, resource utilization, and outcomes across hospitals types.     

Cardiorenal Syndrome and Heart Failure—Challenges and Opportunities

Cardiorenal syndromes (CRS) describe concomitant bidirectional dysfunction of the heart and kidneys in which 1 organ initiates, perpetuates, and/or accelerates decline of the other. CRS are common in heart failure and universally portend worsened prognosis. Despite this heavy disease burden, the appropriate diagnosis and classification of CRS remains problematic. In addition to the hemodynamic drivers of decreased renal perfusion and increased renal vein pressure, induction of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, disruption of balance between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species, and inflammation are implicated in the pathogenesis of CRS. Medical therapy of heart failure including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition and β-adrenergic blockade can blunt these deleterious processes. Renovascular disease can accelerate the progression of CRS. Volume overload and diuretic resistance are common and complicate the management of CRS. In heart failure and CRS being treated with diuretics, worsening creatinine is not associated with worsened outcome if clinical decongestion is achieved. Adjunctive therapy is often required in the management of volume overload in CRS, but evidence for these therapies is limited. Anemia and iron deficiency are importantly associated with CRS and might amplify decline of cardiac and renal function. End-stage cardiac and/or renal disease represents an especially poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options. Overall, worsening renal function is associated with significantly increased mortality. Despite progress in the area of CRS, there are still multiple pathophysiological and clinical aspects of CRS that need further research to eventually develop effective therapeutic options.     

Decision Support Tools: Realizing the Potential to Improve Quality of Care

Delivering evidence-based, personalized care that engages patients requires profound changes in the structure, process, and organization of care, along with revised incentives to support such changes. Health care providers must absorb and apply a vast, usually overwhelming, amount of scientific information to provide high-quality patient care. Accordingly, care remains inconsistent, with unintentional adverse consequences. Decision support tools can provide patient-specific assessments that support clinical decisions, improve prescribing practices, reduce medication errors, improve the delivery of primary as well as secondary prevention, and improve adherence to standards of care. Decision support tools are created using an individual patient’s genetic, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics to improve the delivery of precise, personalized care. Implementation requires ease of use for busy clinicians; uptake improves with active education, and gradual adoption of a tool integrated into care processes without disrupting clinical work flow. As health care systems continue to evolve and computerized support increases, increased implementation of decision support tools that are provided automatically as part of usual work flow, with clinically actionable recommendations at the point of care, requiring accountability for deviations from recommended therapy, represent an important opportunity to enhance quality of care by tailoring treatment to risk, improving the consistency of health care delivery, increasing patient knowledge and engagement, and avoiding specific therapeutic interventions in patients who will receive no benefit. However, successful implementation also requires strategies to engage providers in accepting and using these tools to improve care.     

Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a simple, reliable, and reproducible physiologic index of lesion severity. In patients with intermediate stenosis, FFR≥0.75 can be used to safely defer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and patients with FFR≥0.75 have a very low cardiac event rate. Coronary pressure measurement can determine which lesion should be treated with PCI in patients with tandem lesions, and PCI on the basis of FFR has been demonstrated to result in an acceptably low repeat PCI rate. FFR can identify patients with equivocal left main coronary artery disease who benefit from coronary bypass surgery. Coronary pressure measurement distinguishes patients with an abrupt pressure drop pattern from those with a gradual pressure drop pattern, and the former group of patients benefit from PCI. Coronary pressure measurement is clinically useful in evaluating sufficient recruitable coronary collateral blood flow for prevention of ischemia, which affects future cardiac events. FFR is useful for the prediction of restenosis after PCI. As an end-point of PCI, FFR ≥0.95 and ≥0.90 would be appropriate for coronary stenting and coronary angioplasty, respectively. In summary, if you encounter a coronary stenosis in doubt you should measure pressure rather than dilate it.     

Zero-Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Dextran-Based Optical Coherence Tomography

Individuals with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease are often denied percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of an aversion to the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. We present the case of a 76-year-old man with stage 4 CKD requiring coronary revascularization. Zero-contrast PCI was successfully performed using dextran-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance. Our report suggests the feasibility of dextran-based, OCT-guided, zero-contrast PCI in patients with advanced CKD. Further studies should evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel approach.     

Associations Between Complex PCI and Prasugrel or Clopidogrel Use in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Undergo PCI: From the PROMETHEUS Study

Background

Potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors might offer enhanced benefit against thrombotic events in complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We examined prasugrel use and outcomes according to PCI complexity, as well as analyzing treatment effects according to thienopyridine type.

Insights on Atrial Fibrillation in Congenital Heart Disease

Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have been surviving late into adulthood, with atrial arrhythmias being the most common long-term complication. In recent reports, atrial fibrillation (AF) tended to be the most common form of arrhythmias among groups of patients with adult CHD (ACHD) older than 50 years of age. When compared with their adult counterparts without CHD, AF in patients with ACHD has been characterized by a higher incidence and prevalence, younger age of onset, and a greater risk of progression to persistent AF. Risk factors for the development of AF are not well known but include older age, left atrial dilation, systemic hypertension, and multiple cardiac surgeries. Data on management options such as optimal antiarrhythmic drug therapy, indications for anticoagulation, and efficacy and safety of catheter ablation are limited. There is a crucial need for further research exploring management, prevention, and monitoring strategies for the growing ACHD patient population with AF. This report will provide a contemporary review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management options for AF in this complex patient population.     

Sex And Prognostic Significance of Self-Reported Frailty in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRILOGY ACS Trial

Background

The effect of sex on self-reported frailty in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unclear. We examined the prevalence of self-reported frailty and its association with all-cause death among men and women.

“RotaTripsy”: Combination of Rotational Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy in Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Case Series

Heavily calcified coronary lesions increase the complexity of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and represent a challenge for interventional cardiologists. They are an important cause of stent underexpansion and poor clinical outcome. Nowadays, there are different dedicated devices which enhance the chances of success. Rotational atherectomy is the first-line modality which permits to cross balloons or stents through severe calcified lesions. However, when circumferential deep calcium plaques exist may not be enough to achieve adequate expansion of these devices. In these cases, the complementary use of intracoronary lithotripsy (“RotaTripsy”) can be an effective approach that further modifies the calcified plaque and enables optimal stent implantation. We present the first case series undergoing PCI using “RotaTripsy” technique.     

Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Overview of Recent Advances

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only definitive treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Options for valve replacement include surgical AVR (SAVR) and percutaneous transcatheter AVR. Although transcatheter AVR has recently been shown to be the optimal approach for high-risk patients, SAVR is the gold standard for patients with low and intermediate surgical risk. Advances in technique and innovations in rapid-deployment and sutureless valves have facilitated the development of a third alternative. Accumulating evidence suggests that minimally invasive SAVR can be performed as safely as conventional SAVR, and perhaps with less morbidity, allowing patients a quicker return to their productive lives. The following discussion outlines the surgical technique, patient selection and advances in valve design.     

Transition and Transfer From Pediatric to Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care in Canada: Call For Strategic Implementation

Dramatic increases in survival to adulthood for persons born with congenital heart disease (CHD) have led rise to a corresponding need to provide age-appropriate and developmentally appropriate care across the lifespan. Health care transition is a multidimensional process that ideally begins in early adolescence in the pediatric setting and continues through young adulthood with input from both pediatric and adult CHD providers. Preparation for transition includes the fostering of adolescents' knowledge of their CHD and of self-management and self-advocacy skills needed for lifelong management of chronic disease. Transfer is the event in time when a patient’s care and ownership of health records is taken over by the adult health care team; this is just one element of the broader transition process. Transfer typically occurs by age 18 throughout much of Canada. Successful transition is a shared responsibility, requiring engaged pediatric and adult providers and partnership with both young adults and their parents, all of whom may struggle with this process. An interdisciplinary approach to transition is recommended, given that health care transition is a complex process that occurs within the broader context of young adults’ lives. This review summarizes existing evidence regarding transition and transfer, offers perspectives from multiple stakeholders, and proposes a transition curriculum of development of CHD education and self-management and self-advocacy skills. Specific recommendations to improve implementation of transition and transfer care within the Canadian context are provided. This review sheds light on the current capacity and challenges of adult CHD providers and proposes directions to move this field forward.     

A Population-Based Study of Adherence to Guideline Recommendations and Appropriate-Use Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Studies evaluating physician adherence to guideline recommendations for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy are sparse, and none exist for the application of appropriate-use criteria (AUC) in clinical practice. As part of a quality improvement initiative, a review of all ICD procedures was performed from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 in Alberta, Canada, to evaluate the proportion of patients receiving appropriate ICD therapy and to identify reasons for nonadherence. Our device-implant process involves an electrophysiologist or implanting cardiologist evaluation, reminders of ICD eligibility criteria on the device requisition, and peer-review consensus. Implants were classified according to the 2008 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) ICD guidelines, 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) guidelines, and 2013 AUC. There were 1,300 ICD procedures performed, and the mean age was 63.8 ± 12.9 years; 79% were male; the mean ejection fraction was 0.32 ± 0.13, and 69% were for primary prevention. Among all implants, < 1% were discordant with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) recommendations. Among CRT implants, 10% were inconsistent with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) recommendations. According to AUC, 92% of implants were appropriate. Reasons for nonadherence to ACC/AHA/HRS recommendations included QRS width < 120 msec (n = 3), LVEF > 0.35 (n = 2) and recent myocardial infarction (MI) (n = 1). The most common reason for nonadherence to AUC was the absence of criteria for classification (n = 57, 4%). In this population-based study, we found that a process of specialist evaluation, eligibility reminders on device forms, and peer-review consensus may improve adherence to guideline recommendations and AUC for ICD therapy.     

Management of Coronary Artery Perforation

Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), however if recognized and managed promptly, its adverse consequences can be minimized. Risk factors for CAP include the use of advanced PCI technique (such as atherectomy and chronic total occlusion interventions) and treatment of severely calcified lesions. There are 3 major types of CAP depending on location: (a) large vessel perforation, (b) distal vessel perforation, and (c) collateral perforation.Large vessel perforation is usually treated with implantation of a covered stent, whereas distal and collateral vessel perforations are usually treated with coil or fat embolization. In this article we provide a state-of-the-art overview of the contemporary management of CAP.     

�������ߵĹ�״������������

冠心病和肿瘤并存的情况越来越常见。肿瘤本身及其治疗影响冠状动脉介入术(PCI)的安全性,PCI术后的二联抗血小板治疗也影响肿瘤的手术治疗。因此,肿瘤患者应尽量避免PCI。肿瘤手术前是否进行预防性PCI取决于术前心脏风险评估的结果。PCI只适用于冠状动脉病变严重或不稳定的肿瘤患者,治疗方式应优选单纯球囊扩张或植入金属裸支架。     

冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变的介入治疗

目的总结冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入术的疗效。方法实施经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变患者65例，回顾其临床资料、病变特征和经皮冠状动脉介入术的疗效。冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变靶血管共65支，平均闭塞时间为（10±5）个月，均按标准方法行球囊扩张及支架置入术。结果75％（49／65）的患者成功完成了冠状动脉内支架植入术，共植入金属支架58枚。随闭塞时间的延长，经皮冠状动脉介入术成功率显著降低（P=0．001），真性完全闭塞、残端形态圆钝形或刀切样改变、闭塞长度超过15mm都是经皮冠状动脉介入术低成功率的相关因素（P〈0．05）。所有病例住院期间均未发生主要不良心脏事件。结论冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变实施经皮冠状动脉介入术的技术难度较大，术前选择适当的病例和病变、正确选择和应用器械有利于提高成功率。