Familial breast cancer registry program in patients referred to the cancer institute of Iran

Introduction: Annually a considerable number of people die because of breast cancer, a common diseaseamong women also in Iran. Identifying risk factors and susceptible people can lead to prevention or at leastearly diagnosis. Among susceptibility risks, 5-10% of patients have a family history predisposing factor whichcan influence the risk of incidence among the family. Having a registry program can be a more practical wayto screen high risk families for preventive planning. Method: Based on inclusion criteria, a questionnaire wasprepared and after a pilot study on a small number of patients, actual data were collected on 400 patients andprocessed in SPSS 16.0. Results: Totally, 28.2%of the patients were younger than 40 years old and 36.8% hadthe included criteria for familial breast cancer (FBC). 102 patient’s samples could be compared for receptorpresentation. Similar to other studies, the number of triple negative breast cancers increased as the age decreased.Conclusion: The high percentage of patients with FBC among 400 cases in this study demonstrates that in orderto design an infrastructural diagnostic protocol and screening of patients with FBC, a precise survey related tofrequency and founder mutations of FBC is needed nationwide.     

家族性胃癌研究进展

The etiology of familial gastric cancer (FGC) are E-cadherin (CDH1) mutations, helicobacter pylori infection, etc. The median age of patients with FGC is 50-65 years old. The male-female sex ratio is 2:1. The most of tumors of FGC locate in distal stomach and present diffuse type in histological classification. It is reported that the people who has a family history of gastric cancer especially for those parents has an increased risk of gastric cancer. It is difficult to find FGC in early stage by current technology. The preventive methods include eradication of helicobacter pylori and prophylactic total gastrectomy, etc.     

Population-Based Relative Risks for Lung Cancer Based on Complete Family History of Lung Cancer

IntroductionPublished risk estimates for diagnosis of lung cancer based on family history are typically focused on close relatives, rather than a more diverse or complete family history. This study provides estimates of relative risk (RR) for lung cancer based on comprehensive family history data obtained from a statewide cancer registry linked to a high-quality genealogy data resource that is extensive and deep. The risk estimates presented avoid common recall, recruitment, ascertainment biases, and are based on an individual’s (proband’s) lung cancer family history constellation (pattern of lung cancer affected relatives); numerous constellations are explored.MethodsWe used a population-based genealogic resource linked to a statewide electronic Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program cancer registry to estimate RR for lung cancer for an individual based on their lung cancer family history. The family history data available for a proband included degree of relationship (first- to third-degree), paternal or maternal family lung cancer history, number of lung cancer–affected relatives, and age at diagnosis of affected relatives. More than 1.3 million probands with specific constellations of lung cancer were analyzed. To estimate RRs for lung cancer, the observed number of lung cancer cases among probands with a specific family history constellation was compared to the expected number using internal cohort-specific rates.ResultsA total of 5048 lung cancer cases were identified. Significantly elevated RR was observed for any number of lung cancer–affected relatives among first-, second-, or third-degree relatives. RRs for lung cancer were significantly elevated for each additional lung cancer first-degree relative (FDR) ranging from RR = 2.57 (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 2.39, 2.76) for 1 or more FDR to RR = 4.24 (CI 95%: 1.56, 9.23) for 3 or more FDRs affected. In an absence of FDR family history, increased risk for lung cancer was significant for increasing numbers of affected second-degree relatives (SDRs) ranging from 1.41 (CI 95%: 1.30, 1.52) for 1 or more SDRs to 4.76 (CI 95%: 1.55, 11.11) for 4 or more SDRs. In the absence of affected FDRs and SDRs, there were significantly increased risks based on lung cancer–affected third-degree relatives (TDRs) ranging from 1.18 (CI 95%: 1.11, 1.24) for 1 or more affected TDRs to 1.55 (CI 95%: 1.03, 2.24) for 4 or more affected TDRs. RRs were significantly increased with earlier age at diagnosis of a FDR, and equivalent risks for maternal compared to paternal history were observed.ConclusionsThis study provides population-based estimates of lung cancer risk based on a proband’s complete family history (lung cancer constellation). Many individuals at two to five or more times increased risk for lung cancer are identified. Estimates of RR for lung cancer based on family history are arguably relevant clinically. The constellation RR estimates presented could serve in individual decision-making to direct resource use for lung cancer screening, and could be pivotal in decision-making for screening, treatment, and post-treatment surveillance.     

Knowledge,Barriers and Attitudes Towards Breast Cancer Mammography Screening in Jordan

Background: Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in Jordan. Current efforts are focused onannual campaigns aimed at increasing awareness about breast cancer and encouraging women to conductmammogram screening. In the absence of regular systematic screening for breast cancer in Jordan, there is aneed to evaluate current mammography screening uptake and its predictors, assess women’s knowledge andattitudes towards breast cancer and screening mammograms and to identify barriers to this preventive service.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in six governorates in Jordan through faceto-face interviews on a random sample of women aged 40 to 69 years. Results: A total of 507 participants withmean age of 46.8±7.8 years were interviewed. There was low participation rate in early detection of breastcancer practices. Breast self-examination, doctor examination and periodic mammography screening werereported by 34.9%, 16.8% and 8.6% of study participants, respectively. Additionally 3.8% underwent breastcancer screening at least once but not periodically, while 87.6% had never undergone mammography screening.Reported reasons for conducting the screening were: perceived benefit (50%); family history of breast cancer(23.1%); perceived severity (21.2%); and advice from friend or family member (5.8%). City residents haveshown higher probability of undergoing mammogram than those who live in towns or villages. Results revealednegative perceptions and limited knowledge of study participants on breast cancer and breast cancer screening.The most commonly reported barriers for women who never underwent screening were: fear of results (63.8%);no support from surrounding environment (59.7); cost of the test (53.4%); and religious belief, i.e. Qadaa WaQadar (51.1%). Conclusions: In the absence of regular systematic screening for breast cancer in Jordan, theuptake of this preventive service is very low. It is essential for the country of Jordan to work on applying regularsystematic mammography screening for breast cancer. Additionally, there is a need for improvement in thecurrent health promotion programmes targeting breast cancer screening. Other areas that could be targeted infuture initiatives in this field include access to screening in rural areas and removal of current barriers.     

Knowledge,Attitudes, Preventive Practices and Screening Intention about Colorectal Cancer and the Related Factors among Residents in Guangzhou,China

Background: In Guangzhou, China, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer. The government initiated a CRC screening program in 2015, and investigating the knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward CRC would help facilitate the participation of the program. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 2014 to September 2015. Questionnaires were passed out with a cluster sample in 15 randomly selected primary schools of Guangzhou China, and one of each student’s family members aged between 20 to 65 years old were included. Results: A total of 6839 questionnaires were obtained and the successful response rate was 78.5%. The majority (88.3%) of them were under 46 years old and female subjects accounted for 65.8%. Over 80% of the respondents knew that CRC was able to be cured by early diagnosis and treatment and that tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and dietary without enough fruits or vegetables may increase the risk of CRC, although a few knowledge scores were relatively low, such as physical exercise as a protective factor and bowel habits change as a symptom suggestive of CRC. In contrast, only 52.2% of the subjects were sure to participate in a future CRC screening provided by local government. We further found that the higher level of knowledge about CRC risk and positive cancer preventive attitude and practice were associated with higher education level, female gender, and positive family history. Conclusion: These results suggested that the priority may be laid on improving the conversion from knowledge to practice to implement screening program in Guangzhou, while efforts should also be made to improve public awareness about CRC.     

Finding Incident Breast Cancer Cases through US Claims Data and a State Cancer Registry

Objective: With the increasing availability of automated health-care data, new methods are available to screen large populations for the presence of cancer diagnoses. However, it is crucial to evaluate how completely incident cancer cases can be ascertained using these data sources. Methods: We used capture–recapture techniques to estimate the total number of incident breast cancer cases occurring within one state during a 3-year period. We then compared the ascertainment of these cases by the following two data sources: claims for breast cancer surgery recorded in Medicaid and Medicare data vs a cancer registry in the same state. Results: Medicaid–Medicare breast cancer surgery claims identified 68% of the total estimated number of incident breast cancer cases while cancer registry data identified 78%. Case ascertainment improved markedly to 91% when both registry and Medicare–Medicaid data sources were used together. The sensitivity of ascertainment was lower for Medicaid–Medicare data among those aged under 65 and non-white; ascertainment was lower for the registry among women who were aged under 65, poor, and non-white. Conclusions: Combining health insurance claims data with a population-based cancer registry improved the identification of incident cases of breast cancer, and may be particularly useful among demographic groups found to be at highest risk of under-ascertainment such as younger women, the poor, and racial minorities.     

Cervical Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Muslim Societies

Background: The overall cervical cancer incidence rate is low in Iran; however, because of a higher risk of death for cervical cancer, a disease that kills women in middle age, a cervical cancer control program is needed. The aim of this study was to provide consensus recommendation for cervical cancer prevention in Iran and other Muslim societies with low incidences of cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Through a practical guideline development cycle, we developed six questions that were relevant to produce the recommendation. We reviewed 190 full text records of cervical cancer in Iran (1971 to 2013) of which 13 articles were related to the data needed to answer the recommendation questions. We also reviewed World Health Organization, IARC, GLOBOCAN report, Iran Ministry of Health cancer registry report and 8 available foreign countries guidelines. Lastly, we also evaluated the Pap smear results of 825 women who participated in the Iranian HPV survey, of whom 328 were followed-up after a 5-year interval. Results: The obtained data highlighted the burden of HPV and cervical cancer situation in Iran. Experts emphasized the necessity of a cervical cancer screening program for Iranian women, and recommended an organized screening program with a cytological evaluation (Pap smear) that would start at the age of 30 years, repeated every 5 years, and end at the age of 69 years. Meanwhile, there is no need for screening among women with a hysterectomy, and screening should be postponed to post-partum among pregnant women. Conclusions: An organized cervical cancer screening is a necessity for Iran as more than 500-900 women in middle age diagnosed with an invasive cervical cancer every year cannot be ignored. This recommendation should be taken into account by the National Health System of Iran and Muslim countries with shared culture and behavior patterns. CUBA HPV test could be consideration in countries Muslim country with appropriate budget, resources and facility.     

Screening for Circulating Tumour Cells Allows Early Detection of Cancer and Monitoring of Treatment Effectiveness: An Observational Study

Background: Circulating-Tumour-Cells (CTC) provide a blood biomarker for early carcinogenesis, cancer progression and treatment effectiveness. An increase in CTCs is associated with cancer progression, a CTC decrease with cancer containment or remission. Several technologies have been developed to identify CTC, including the validated Isolation-by-Size-of-Epithelial-Tumour (ISET, Rarecells) technology, combining blood filtration and microscopy using standard histo-pathological criteria. Methods: This observational study compared CTC count to cancer status and cancer risk, by monitoring treatment effectiveness in cancer patients and by screening for CTC in asymptomatic patients with risk factors, including family history of cancer. Results: Between Sept-2014 and Dec-2016 we undertook 600 CTC tests (542 patients), including 50% screening requests of patients without cancer diagnosis but with risk factors. CTC were detected in all cancer patients (n=277, 100%), and in half of the asymptomatic patients screened (50%, 132 out-of 265 patients). Follow-up tests including scans, scheduled within 1-10 months of positive CTC tests, found early cancerous lesions in 20% of screened patients. In 50% of male patients with CTC and normal PSA (prostate-specific-antigen) levels, PSMA-PET scans revealed increased uptake in the prostate, indicative of early prostate cancer. Other types of cancers detected by CTC screening and subsequent scans included early breast, ovarian, lung, or renal cancer. Patients with CTC were advised on integrative approaches including immune-stimulating and anti-carcinogenic nutritional therapies. CTC repeat tests were available in 10% of patients with detected CTC (40 out-of 409 patients, n=98 CTC tests) to assess treatment effectiveness, suggesting nutritional therapies to be beneficial in reducing CTC count. Conclusions: CTC screening provided a highly sensitive biomarker for the early detection of cancer, with higher CTC counts being associated with higher risk of malignancy. CTC monitoring over time indicated treatment effectiveness. Nutrients with anti-carcinogenic properties could reduce CTC count, and included curcumin, garlic, green tea, grape seed, modified citrus pectin, and medicinal mushroom extract.     

Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program

BACKGROUND:

Screening by fecal occult blood test and lower endoscopy has lowered colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality, but compliance gaps persist. Of concern are possible disparities in uptake of CRC screening between white and African American men. The goal of this study was to assess for disparities in uptake of CRC screening among men participating in a high‐risk prostate cancer clinic. If present, such disparities could support hypotheses for further research examining racial differences in awareness and patient preferences in undergoing CRC screening.

METHODS:

Baseline data on a racially diverse cohort of men aged 50 to 69 years at increased risk of prostate cancer collected via the Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program at Fox Chase Cancer Center were analyzed. Predictors of uptake of CRC screening were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS:

Compared with whites, African American men had statistically significantly lower uptake of fecal occult blood testing (African American 49.0% vs white 60.7%, P = .035), lower endoscopy (African American 44.1% vs white 58.5%, P = .011), and any CRC screening (African American 66.2% vs white 76.3%, P = .053). Predictors of uptake of lower endoscopy among African American men included older age (odds ratio [OR], 3.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87‐6.97), family history of CRC (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.30‐9.25), and insurance status (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.04‐3.46).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite awareness of cancer risk and motivation to seek prostate cancer screening through a specialized prostate cancer risk assessment program, evidence supporting compliance gaps with CRC screening among men was found. Tailored messages to younger African American men with and without a family history of CRC are needed. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Knowledge,Attitude and Practices of Women in Maldives Related to the Risk Factors,Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer

Background: A population-based cervical cancer screening program using visual inspection with acetic acid was launched in Maldives in 2014. Our study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of women in relation to risk factors of cervical cancer, early detection of the disease and its prevention. Materialsand Methods: The questionnaire based survey was conducted among 20 to 50 year old women, systematically sampled to represent three regions of Maldives. Trained investigators interviewed a total of 2,845 women at home. Results: The prevalence of the risk factors of cervical cancer like early age at marriage and childbirth, multiple marriages, multiple marriages of the husbands, and multiple pregnancies was high. More women knew about breast cancer than cervical cancer. Even among the small number of women who knew of cervical cancer, only 34.6% had the knowledge of at least one early symptom. Very few women knew that the cancer could be prevented by any test. Only 6.2% of the women reported having ever undergone a Pap smear. Many women had the misconception that cervical cancer was infectious. In Maldives the younger women have high literacy rate due to the policy of universal free education and those with higher levels of education had improved knowledge of cervical cancer and its risk factors. The prevalence of risk factors also reduced with improvedliteracy. Conclusions: Awareness about risk factors and prevention of cervical cancer is limited among Maldivian women in spite of having high exposure to some of the risk factors. A universal literacy program in the country has helped to improve the knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and to reduce the exposure to various risk factors in the younger population.     

Do Subjective Norms Predict the Screening of Cancer Patients’ First-Degree Relatives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Early detection and preventive measures can reduce the risk of cancer among first degree relatives (FDRs) of cancer patients.Several studies investigated the effect of subjective norm in relation to FDRs’ tendency to conduct preventive behaviors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of subjective norms on cancer patients’ FDRs as well as their willingness for screening. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were studied to investigate the effect of subjective norms on preventive measures such as breast cancer self-examination, colonoscopy, PSA testing, skin examination, and genetic testing. Odds Ratio (OR), correlation was and confidence intervals were extracted for meta-analysis. After reviewing the studies, only 16 studies met the criteria to be included in this systematic review. Results: The meta- analysis and OR showed that Physician Recommendation (OR=6.98, 95% CI; 2.55–19.09, P<0.001), Health Care Provider (HCP) (OR=2.79, 95% CI; 1.26-6.16; P=0.011), family and friends (OR=1.82, 95% CI; 1.33–2.50, P <0.001) significantly enhanced the likelihood of referring for screening and preventive measures. Conclusions: The results of the current study indicated that subjective norms can significantly increase willingness to screening.     

Health Economics Evaluation of a Gastric Cancer Early Detection and Treatment Program in China

Objective: To use health economics methodology to assess the screening program on gastric cancer in Zhuanghe, China, so as to provide the basis for health decision on expanding the program of early detection and treatment. Materials and Methods: The expense of an early detection and treatment program for gastric cancer in patients found by screening, and also costs of traditional treatment in a hospital of Zhuanghe were assessed. Three major techniques of medical economics, namely cost-effective analysis (CEA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA), were used to assess the screening program. Results: Results from CEA showed that investing every 25, 235 Yuan on screening program in Zhuanghe area, one gastric cancer patient could be saved. Data from CUA showed that it was cost 1, 370 Yuan per QALY saved. Results from CBA showed that: the total cost was 1,945,206 Yuan with a benefit as 8,669,709 Yuan and an CBR of 4.46. Conclusions: The early detection and treatment program of gastric cancer appears economic and society-beneficial. We suggest that it should be carry out in more high risk areas for gastric cancer.     

Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colon cancer. The aim of this state-wide study was to investigate the compliance for colonoscopic in first-degree relatives, who were younger than 60 years of age. METHODS: A total of 602 patients were identified from the tumor registry of the public health insurance of Lower Saxony. A questionnaire was sent to these patients, which included a number of different questions regarding their knowledge about the risk of colon cancer for their family members, as well as their participation in screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Data from 442 patients and their first-degree relatives (1005 siblings and 354 parents) were available; 178 parents had undergone screening colonoscopy and 344 siblings. Interestingly, the percentage of siblings who underwent screening colonoscopy was significantly higher (27%) among those siblings where the index patients were aware of the increased risk for the first-degree relatives, in contrast to the siblings of the index patients who were not aware of this risk (20%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that only a minority of first-degree relatives undergo screening colonoscopy and that informing patients about the potential risk for their relatives will increase participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of the patients.     

Cancer family history characterization in an unselected cohort of 121 patients with uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. The extent of the contribution of familial/hereditary predisposition to the development of uveal melanoma is largely unknown. Thus we sought to ascertain the frequency of cancers in patients with UM and their family members to identify the prevalence of hereditary/familial predisposition to cancer in these patients. An unselected series of 121 patients with UM seen in a university-based tertiary referral program were consented to the study. Cancer histories (site and age of diagnosis) were obtained for all first- and second-degree relatives. Patients/families were classified as being potentially at high risk for hereditary predisposition if they met any of the following criteria: (1) Diagnosis of UM at age 30 or under, (2) Two or more cases of UM in the family, (3) UM plus at least one other primary cancer in the same patient (excluding non-melanoma skin and cervix cancers due to their strong environmental etiological link). (4) Family history meeting high risk criteria for a known hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome as defined by Hampel et al. (J Med Genet 41(2): 81–91, 2004). One patient had a family history of UM (0.8%). Ten patients (8.3%) had a personal and/or family history consistent with predisposition to a known hereditary cancer syndrome including six with possible hereditary breast, two with hereditary colon and two with hereditary melanomas. Twenty three patients (19%) had a personal history of a second cancer after exclusion of non-melanoma skin and cervical cancers. The frequency of cutaneous melanomas was significantly higher in UM patients than the general population (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.00–6.94). Patients with a family history suggestive of a high risk predisposition to a known cancer syndrome had a significantly higher risk for having a second cancer than the remaining UM patients (P = 0.02). Our results indicate that the frequency of UM patients with high risk for a hereditary cancer predisposition is much higher than earlier estimates (0.6%) and that it could be as high as 11.6%. Our results suggest that cancer phenotypes in these patients are diverse and include cancers other than UM. Thus, alerting ophthalmologists to the need for expanding their cancer family history intake to include other cancers is warranted. It also suggests that patients with a hereditary predisposition to UM have a higher risk for the development of other cancers and that characterization of the germline genetic alterations in these patients is highly warranted.     

Breast Cancer Knowledge and Screening Behaviour among Women with a Positive Family History: A Cross Sectional Study

Background: Breast cancer is the commonest type of cancer among women, and in Malaysia 50-60% of thenew cases are being detected at late stages. Do age, education level, income, ethnicity, relationship with breastcancer patients and knowledge of breast cancer risk factors influence breast screening practices? This studyrevealed interesting but significant differences. Objectives: To assess the knowledge of breast cancer risk factorsand early detection measures among women in a high risk group. Materials and Methods: A cross sectionalsurvey of one hundred and thirty one women relatives of breast cancer patients was carried out. Participantswere selected through purposive sampling, during hospital visits. A self-administered questionnaire was used fordata collection. Results: The majority of the respondents (71%) had poor knowledge of the risk factors for breastcancer. Income, relationship with a patient and practise of breast cancer screening predicted performance ofmammography, R2=0.467, F=12.568, p<0.0001. Conclusions: The finding shows inadequate knowledge of breastcancer risk factors and poor cancer screening practise among women with family history of breast cancer. Poorknowledge and practise of breast screening are likely to lead to late stage presentation of breast cancer disease.Some important predictors of breast cancer screening behaviour among women with positive family historyof breast cancer were identified. An understanding of the strengths and significance of the association betweenthese factors and breast screening behaviour is vital for developing more targeted breast health promotion.     

Prevalence of Colorectal Cancer in Relatives of Iranian Patients Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer

Background: A high rate of colorectal cancer occurrence is established in individuals with a positive familyhistory of this type of cancer. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of colorectalcancer in first degree and second degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Methods: Family medical historiesof 489 first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients were obtained by a questionnaire. 249 average riskpatients with no family history of colorectal cancer were included as control patients. Results: In our study froma total of 489 case patients, 153 (31.3%) had at least one close relative affected by colon cancer. Case-controlanalysis showed an odd ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 2.07 to 6.27) for one and 5.7 (CI, 2.39 to 13.56) for two affectedrelatives. Cases with a positive family history had a 3.006 times greater risk in developing colorectal cancer if afirst degree relative was affected comparing with a 4.898 time greater risk if a second degree family memberwas diagnosed with colorectal cancer .Our study indicated a higher risk for developing colorectal cancer in malefamily relatives 50 years and older. Rectal area was found the most tumor side affected in case and controlpatients. Conclusion: First-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer had an increased risk of developingthis type of cancer. The risk was greater when diagnosis was in male, elderly patients and other first-degreerelatives were affected.     

四川巴中市食管癌早诊早治结果分析及居民防癌知识认知调查

[目的]了解四川省巴中市食管癌高发区居民食管癌及癌前病变的患病情况,分析居民防癌知识认知情况,为制定防癌措施提供科学依据。[方法]以40~69岁居民为筛查对象,进行内镜下碘染色及指示性活检筛查。对筛查对象进行癌症防治综合知识问卷调查。[结果]食管炎症及食管轻、中、重度异型增生检出率分别为7.81%、5.63%、1.99%、0.79%,食管癌检出率为0.21%。居民对肺癌、肝癌、胃癌、食管癌是我国的常见癌症等知识的知晓率较高;男性、有肿瘤家族史、年龄较小及文化程度高者防癌知识得分较高。[结论]应针对不同筛查对象加大癌症防治知识的宣传力度,提高人群癌症防治知识的知晓率。     

Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control--a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States)

Objective: In preparation for jointly publishing official government cancer statistics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) compared incidence rates from NCI's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). Methods: Data for 1999 covering 78% of the US population were obtained from SEER and selected NPCR registries that met high quality data criteria. incidence rates (per 100,000 population) were age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population, and 95% gamma confidence intervals were estimated Results: NPCR rates for all sites combined were higher than SEER rates (males: NPCR 553.6, SEER 538.7; females: NPCR 420.8, SEER 412.5), but rates for specific cancer sites varied by registry program. Rates for colon cancer (males: NPCR 47.0, SEER 42.7; females: NPCR 36.5, SEER 33.8) and tobacco-related cancers were higher in NPCR than SEER. In contrast, NPCR rates were lower than SEER rates for cancers of the female breaset (NPCR 134.0, SEER 135.9), prostate (NPCR 162.0, SEER 170.2), and melanoma as well as for cancers more common among Asians and Pacific Islanders (e.g., stomach cancer).Conclusions: Rate differences may arise from population difference in socio-demographic characteristics, screening use, health behaviors, exposure to cancer causing agents or registry operations factors.