DNA methylation profiling of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using liquid-based cytology specimens: an approach that utilizes receiver-operating characteristic analysis

BACKGROUND: Cervical carcinoma is a common malignancy among women worldwide, and its pathogenesis is related causally to human papillomavirus infection. The progression from precursor squamous intraepithelial lesions to cervical carcinoma requires additional genetic and epigenetic alterations that have not been characterized fully. The authors examined aberrant promoter methylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes in precursor squamous intraepithelial lesions. METHODS: A multiplex, nested, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction approach was used to examine promoter methylation of 15 tumor suppressor genes in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL, n = 11), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL, n = 17), and negative tissues (n = 11) from liquid-based cytology samples. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was determined for individual methylated tumor suppressor genes and for gene combinations to evaluate test performance for the ability of methylation profiles to distinguish HSIL cytology samples from combined LSIL/negative cytology samples. RESULTS: Aberrant promoter methylation of DAPK1 and IGSF4 occurred at a high frequency in HSIL samples and was absent in LSIL and negative samples. There was a significant trend toward increased methylation with the increased severity of lesions, and the mean number of methylated genes was significantly higher in HSIL samples compared with LSIL and negative samples. Using the area under the ROC curve as a measure of test performance, the methylation of IGSF4 and DAPK1 had areas that were significantly greater than 0.5; thus, each had the ability to distinguish HSIL samples from combined LSIL/negative samples. The areas under the curve for the best two-gene combination (IGSF4/DAPK1) and the best three-gene combination (IGSF4/DAPK1/HIC1) were not statistically different from the best individual tumor suppressor gene (IGSF4) in distinguishing HSIL samples from combined LSIL/negative samples. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant promoter methylation of tumor suppressor genes is an epigenetic alteration that occurs during neoplastic progression to cervical carcinoma. The methylation status of multiple tumor suppressor genes can be evaluated using ROC analysis to determine methylation profiles that can distinguish HSIL samples from combined LSIL/negative samples.     

CyclinA1 Promoter Methylation in Self-Sampling Test

Background: Self sampled HPV testing is a cervical cancer screening method . However, cytology in self-sampled specimen cannot be used as a triage test.  Therefore, other methods for triage should be considered. CyclinA1 (CCNA1) promoter methylation has strong association with cervical precancerous and cancerous lesion. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of CCNA1 and self-sampled specimen for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions or worse (CIN2+). Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted. Women with abnormal cytology or positive for high risk HPV (hrHPV) indicated for colposcopic examination were enrolled.  Self-collected sampling for hrHPV DNA (SS-HPV) and CCNA1 were performed. hrHPV DNA testing was done by Cobas 4800 method. CCNA1 promoter methylation was detected by CCNA1 duplex methylation specific PCR. Histopathologic result as CIN2+ obtaining from colposcopic directed biopsy or excisional procedure  was considered as positive a gold standard. The results of hrHPV and CCNA1 were reported as positive or negative. Sensitivity specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SS-HPV and CCNA1 were calculated by comparing the results with the gold standard. Results: Two hundreds and eighty women were recruited. High-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer (CIN2+) were diagnosed in 21.8% (61 cases) of the patients. The most common type of hrHPV was non 16, 18 subtype, followed by HPV16 and 18. CCNA1 was positive in 13 patients out of whom, twelve were CIN2+. Sensitivity of CCNA1 was 19.7 % and its  specificity and accuracy were 99.5% and 82.14%, respectively.  The sensitivity of SS-HPV was 70.5%, and its  specificity and accuracy were 39.2% and 43.3%, respectively. Conclusion:  Due to high specificity and positive predictive value of CCNA1, it can be used as alarming sign of having high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions, especially in patient who has positive hrHPV DNA test based on self-collected sampling.     

LINE-1 and Alu Methylation in hrHPV-Associated Precancerous Cervical Samples

Objective: This study was conducted to determine global DNA methylation patterns in cervical cells cytologically identified as atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS) with a normal, LSIL, or HSIL histopathological result. Methods: Methylation patterns of long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1) and short interspersed element (Alu) sequences were assessed using the combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA) method in cervical samples with cytology-diagnosed cervical lesions. Results: In cervical precancerous lesions with hrHPV positive, the percentage of overall (mC) and mCmC LINE-1 methylation levels showed a stepwise increase from hrHPV positive normal to HSIL with significant differences (p<0.001). However, both methylation levels were significantly higher in hrHPV negative normal than in hrHPV positive normal (p<0.001). The overall (mC) Alu methylation in hrHPV positive LSIL and HSIL was lower than in hrHPV positive normal, with a significant difference (p<0.05). Remarkably, the percentage of uCmC and mCuC of LINE-1 and Alu in three different hrHPV positive cervical lesions showed a stepwise decrease from hrHPV positive normal, LSIL and HSIL, respectively. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed that the LINE-1 mC and mCmC patterns have high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing HSIL from normal/LSIL in hrHPV positive cases at the appropriate cutoff levels. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the LINE-1 and Alu methylation data in normal and premalignant cervical epithelia. LINE-1 hypomethylation was found in hrHPV positive normal cells, with lower methylation levels associated with cancer features. In cytologically diagnosed Atypical Squamous Cells of Unknown Significance (ASCUS), the levels of mC and the mCmC pattern could be utilized in concert with hrHPV detection to classify the ASCUS sample prior to colposcopy.     

Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

Low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) is a common cytologic finding in cervical screening, yet only about 10–20% have significant histologic abnormalities and these are almost always positive for high‐risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). This analysis aims to clarify the role of hrHPV DNA testing in the triage of women with LSIL cytology. In the ATHENA screening trial, we examined 1,084 cases of LSIL, of which 925 had an evaluable biopsy, to determine the extent to which hrHPV testing can identify those patients who have precursor lesions in need of immediate clinical referral and those who have changes more likely to regress spontaneously. Overall, 71.2% of LSIL cases were hrHPV positive, but the prevalence was age dependent, with only 56.1% in women ≥40 years. Among women with LSIL, 11.6% (107/925) had a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) histologic diagnosis and, of these, only nine were hrHPV negative. For CIN3+, 91.7% (44/48) of women with LSIL were hrHPV positive. The negative predictive value of hrHPV testing for CIN3+ in LSIL was 100% for women aged ≥40 years. Women who were HPV16 positive had a higher positive predictive value for CIN2+ (25.4%) than those who were positive for 12 other pooled hrHPV types (11.5%). Testing for hrHPV in women with LSIL is effective in identifying high‐grade cervical lesions, thereby avoiding unnecessary referrals to colposcopy and potential over‐treatment of non‐progressive lesions, especially for women aged ≥40 years.     

DNA methylation in anal intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Anal intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with human papillomavirus infection and may progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which is increasing in immunocompromised patients. We hypothesize that anal intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with abnormal DNA methylation and that detection of these events may be used to improve screening programs. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seventy-six patients were identified who underwent anal cytology screening and subsequent biopsy at our institution between 1999 and 2004. The specimens from these patients included 184 anal biopsies [normal, n = 57; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), n = 74; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), n = 41; and invasive SCC, n = 12] and 37 residual liquid-based anal cytology specimens (normal, n = 11; LSIL, n = 12; HSIL, n = 14). The methylation status of the following genes was determined for each biopsy and cytology sample using real-time methylation-specific PCR: HIC1, RASSF1, RARB, CDKN2A, p14, TP73, APC, MLH1, MGMT, DAPK1, and IGSF4. RESULTS: Methylation-specific PCR analysis of biopsy samples revealed that DNA methylation was more common in SCC and HSIL than LSIL and normal mucosa. Specifically, methylation of IGSF4 and DAPK1 was prevalent in SCC (75% and 75% of cases, respectively) and HSIL (59% and 71%, respectively) but was absent in LSIL and normal biopsy samples. Methylation profiles of cytologic samples were similar to those found in the biopsy samples. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant DNA methylation is a frequent event in anal HSIL and SCC. Methylation of IGSF4 and DAPK1 is specific for HSIL and SCC, and may serve as a useful molecular biomarker.     

阴道镜结果正常或低度病变妇女发生宫颈癌前病变的前瞻性风险分层研究

  目的  探讨细胞学、高危型人乳头瘤病毒（high risk human papillomavirus,hrHPV）分型对于阴道镜结果正常或低级别鳞状上皮内病变（low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,LSIL）妇女的风险预测作用。  方法  基于1999年6月在山西省建立的宫颈癌筛查队列,以2005年随访时阴道镜结果为正常或低度病变的596例妇女为研究对象,于2010年和2014年进行随访。分析hrHPV阴性组、hrHPV阳性组、HPV16/18阳性组、细胞学LSIL以下组和细胞学LSIL及以上组发生宫颈上皮内瘤样病变2级及以上（cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse,CIN2+）的瞬时、5年和9年累积风险和相对危险度。  结果  细胞学LSIL以下组发生CIN2+的瞬时、5年和9年累积风险分别为0.2%、2.8%和4.2%,细胞学LSIL及以上组相应的风险分别为14.7%（RR=73.8,95% CI为9.7~561.5）、40.0%（RR=16.0,95% CI为8.2~31.1）和51.4%（RR=15.0,95% CI为8.3~27.0）。hrHPV阴性组发生CIN2+的瞬时风险、5年和9年累积风险较低,分别为0.6%、2.7%和3.8%,hrHPV阳性和HPV16/18阳性组发生CIN2+的风险逐渐升高,其中HPV16/18阳性组的相应风险分别为13.2%（RR=23.4,95% CI为5.1~106.9）、36.9%（RR=15.4,95% CI为6.9~34.3）和42.6%（RR=14.1,95% CI为6.8~29.2）。  结论  阴道镜结果正常或LSIL妇女,若细胞学结果为LSIL及以上或HPV16/18阳性,未来进展为高度宫颈癌前病变的风险较高,细胞学和HPV16/18分型可用于该人群的临床分流管理。      

Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests

BACKGROUND: Aberrant promoter methylation of selective tumor suppressor genes has been detected in squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and invasive cervical cancer. Identification of methylation profiles of genes that can distinguish high-grade SIL (HSIL) from low-grade SIL (LSIL), and cytologically negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) residual liquid-based Papanicolaou (Pap) tests may be potentially useful as an ancillary test for cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Using real-time quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (QMSP), the authors analyzed the frequency and relative level of promoter methylation for DAPK1, IGSF4, SPARC, and TFPI2 in biopsy-confirmed HSIL and LSIL, and NILM residual liquid-based Pap tests. The percentage of methylation (%M) for each gene was calculated using the reference gene, ACTB. The cumulative methylation score for each sample, defined as the sum of %M of all 4 genes, was used to analyze the genes in combination. RESULTS: For each gene analyzed the frequency and relative level of methylation were increased in HSIL compared with combined NILM/LSIL samples. The cumulative methylation scores were significantly higher in HSIL samples (P < .0001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) demonstrated that methylation of each gene could distinguish HSIL from NILM/LSIL samples (AUC range, 0.6-0.67; P < or = .0028). The combination of 4 genes showed improved test performance (AUC = 0.76; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in cumulative methylation in HSIL cases with histologic outcomes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) versus CIN3. There was no association between the methylation of any gene and the presence of human papillomavirus. CONCLUSIONS: The methylation profile of multiple genes in combination can better distinguish HSIL from combined NILM/LSIL samples. Although aberrant DNA methylation has the potential to function as a molecular biomarker of HSIL in liquid-based Pap tests, additional genes that are selectively methylated in HSIL are needed to improve the clinical performance.     

p16(INK4a) is a useful marker of human papillomavirus integration allowing risk stratification for cervical malignancies

The present study was conducted to assess utility of p16(INK4a) immunopositivity as a surrogate marker for genomic integration of high-risk human papillomavirus infection (hrHPV). A total of 29 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), 27 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and 53 invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), histologically-diagnosed between 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2008 at the University of Malaya Medical Centre were stained for p16(INK4a) (CINtec Histology Kit (REF 9511, mtm laboratories AG, Heidelberg, Germany). Immunopositvity was defined as diffuse staining of the squamous cell cytoplasm and or nucleus (involving > 75% of the intraepithelial lesions or SCCs). Staining of basal and parabasal layers of intraepithelial lesions was pre-requisite. One (3.4%) LSIL, 24 (88.9%) HSIL and 46 (86.8%) SCC were p16(INK4a) immunopositive. All normal squamous epithelium did not express p16(INK4). p16(INK4a) expression was significantly lower (p<0.05) in LSIL compared with HSIL and SCC with no difference in expression between HSIL and SCC.The increased p16(INK4a) immunopositivity in HSIL and SCC appears in line with the integrated existence of the hrHPV and may provide more insightful information on risk of malignant transformation of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions than mere hrHPV detection.     

Association of Righ-Risk Human Papillomavirus and Ureaplasma parvum Co-Infections with Increased Risk of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Cervical Lesions

Objective: The present report investigated the rates of coinfections between high-rik human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and the most important human mycoplasmas including Mycoplasma hominis, M. genitalium, Ureaplasma urealyticum and U. parvum in cervical samples of asymptomatic brazilian population. Methods: Were included a total of 283 women aged 25–64 years screened by Papanicolaou smears for determining cervical abnormalities, single-target polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR (rt-PCR) for hrHPV and mycoplasmas, respectively. Results: A total of 273 (94.5%) women were negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy cytology (NILM) and 10 (3.5%) presented abnormal cytology, all low-grade intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). The prevalence of hrHPV was 12.7% and 53.7% for mycoplasmas. U. parvum was the most frequently bacteria detected, followed by Mycoplasma hominis and U. urealyticum. M. genitalium was not detected. Women positive for U. parvum presented a 5-fold increased risk of LSIL (OR = 5.33; 95% CI = 1.09-26.04, P = 0.02) and co-infections between U. parvum and hrHPV increased the risk for LSIL (OR = 3.88; 95% CI = 1.75-8.58, P = 0.0003). However, these associations were not dependent on the concentration of the bacteria. Conclusion: Our results reinforced the hypothesis that some mycoplasmas may play a role as cofactors in HPV-mediated cervical carcinogenesis, at least in some populations.     

九价HPV疫苗所针对的高危型HPV亚型在宫颈癌及其癌前病变中应用有效性的初步预测

背景与目的：宫颈癌是世界范围内女性第4常见的恶性肿瘤,在我国其发病率和死亡率都呈上升趋势,高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,hrHPV)持续感染与浸润宫颈癌(invasive cervical carcinoma,ICC)及其癌前病变的发生、发展关系密切,HPV预防性疫苗的研制应用成为宫颈癌一级预防的有效措施。该研究拟通过分析九价HPV疫苗所针对的7种HPV高危亚型(HPV16、18、31、33、45、52和58)在经组织学证实的宫颈癌及癌前病变中的分布,为九价疫苗在本地区人群的应用前景评估提供更多依据。方法：回顾性收集复旦大学附属肿瘤医院病理科行聚合酶链反应-反向点杂交法(polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blot,PCR-RDB)进行HPV基因分型检测的患者,经计算HPV阳性患者中特定HPV亚型的阳性比例来评价HPV亚型对宫颈癌及其癌前病变的相对贡献。采用比例权重归因(proportional weighting attribution,PWA)方法将多重感染中亚型占比折算至相应的单型别感染。结果：符合入组条件者共计624例,分别为117例未见上皮内病变及恶性病变(negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy,NILM),45例低级别鳞状上皮内病变(low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,LSIL),268例高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)和194例ICC。HPV总感染率为84.29%(526/624),在LSIL、HSIL及ICC组中的感染率分别为71.11%,95.90%及91.75%。HPV16/18 PWA合计占比在LSIL、HSIL和ICC组中依次上升,分别为50.00%、70.44%和91.71%。九价疫苗针对的7种hrHPV的PWA合计占比均较HPV16/18提高,在LSIL、HSIL和ICC中分别为86.34%,98.61%和94.89%。额外增加的5种hrHPV(HPV31、33、45、52和58)的相对贡献在LSIL、HSIL和ICC组中依次下降,分别为36.34%、28.17%和3.18%。结论：九价疫苗额外增加的5种hrHPV型别在本地区有望令更高比例的ICC及癌前病变得到预防,尤其对于LSIL和HSIL的预防有较大改善。     

Immunoreactivity of p16 in anal cytology specimens: histologic correlation

BACKGROUND: Cytology has been proposed as a potential screening tool in the evaluation of squamous anorectal disease in view of the morphologic similarities between anal and cervical squamous lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated that p16 overexpression correlates with the degree of dysplasia in the uterine cervix with promising results. Due to potential diagnostic pitfalls in anal cytology, p16 overexpression in these specimens was studied. METHODS: Patients with anorectal cytology who underwent follow-up biopsy within 1 year were selected. Forty-three anorectal cytologic specimens from 29 patients were selected. One slide of each case was destained. Avidin-biotin immunocytochemical studies with the monoclonal antibody CINtec p16(INK4a) were performed. The results of the p16 immunostaining were correlated with the histologic findings. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 43 cases demonstrated the presence of squamous cells immunoreactive for p16 in cytology specimens. The p16-positive cells were identified in cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) (n = 3 cases), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (n = 22 cases), and invasive squamous carcinoma (n = 1 case), and in 2 cases with negative follow-up biopsies. No cell immunoreactive for p16 was found in 15 cases (5 benign cases and 10 cases with either LSIL or HSIL). The sensitivity and specificity of p16 immunoreactivity in the detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma were 72% and 71%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 93% and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of p16 immunoreactivity is a good predictor of dysplasia in anal specimens. However, the sensitivity and specificity of this marker are not high.     

Adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option for disease risk assessment in patients with negative Papanicolaou tests without an endocervical/transformation zone sample

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that women with negative Papanicolaou (Pap) test results and no endocervical/transformation zone (EC/TZ) sample return for screening within 12 months. For some women, this represents earlier follow-up than advocated in several routine screening guidelines. Controversy remains with regard to the correlation between sampling of the EC/TZ, Pap test quality, and disease risk assessment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted reviewing the results from 143,438 liquid-based cervical Pap tests performed at a large academic women's hospital between July 2005 and December 2006. Vaginal Pap tests were excluded from the study. Women with any Pap result, women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Pap test results were stratified by 10-year age groups and according to the presence or absence of an EC/TZ sample (EC/TZS). Women with LSIL and HSIL Pap test results with and without an EC/TZS were also compared for rates of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA detection. RESULTS: Of the total of 143,438 cervical Pap tests performed, 27,359 (19.1%) were reported to be lacking an EC/TZS. The absence of an EC/TZS was found to be highest in adolescents and in mature women aged >or=50 years. The overall detection rate of LSIL was 4.29% and that of HSIL was 0.64%. Both the LSIL and HSIL rates were found to be significantly higher in Pap tests with an EC/TZS compared with Pap tests without an EC/TZS (LSIL: 4.51% vs 3.37% and HSIL: 0.72% vs 0.29%). However, when women with LSILs and HSILs were divided into a group in which EC/TZS was present and a group in which EC/TZS was absent, no significant differences were found to be present with regard to hrHPV DNA rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive hrHPV DNA testing is effective in stratifying risk for the presence of SIL in women with and without an EC/TZS. This finding is consistent with recently reported data from >9000 patients with negative Pap results, which found that hrHPV DNA-positive test rates are independent of the presence or absence of an EC/TZS. hrHPV DNA results provide a useful new optional adjunctive tool for the objective stratification of disease risk in women with negative Pap tests and no EC/TZS.     

高危型HPV E6/E7mRNA检测在宫颈机会性筛查中应用价值研究

目的 人乳头瘤病毒(human papillomavirus,HPV) DNA能提高检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级+(cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+,CIN2+)的灵敏度,但也增加了一过性HPV感染的检出率.本研究应用高危型HPV(high risk human papillomavirus,hrHPV) E6/E7 mRNA对比二代杂交捕获(hybrid CaptureⅡ,HC2)、HPV分型,描述机会性筛查人群中HPV感染及宫颈病变分布特征,探讨其用于宫颈筛查的可行性.方法 选取2013-01-01-2015-12-31在青岛大学附属青岛市立医院(6 138例)和青岛市城阳区人民医院(1 653例)妇科门诊行宫颈液基细胞学筛查的女性共计7 791例,年龄21～65岁.所有筛查女性行液基细胞学检查的同时行HPV检测,根据HPV检测方法的不同分为HC2组、HPV分型组和E6/E7组共3组.计算各组细胞学结果异常率、HPV阳性率和宫颈病变检出率,比较E6/E7所描述的流行病学特征与HPV-DNA方法的不同.结果 E6/E7组各级细胞学结果分别为,未见上皮内瘤变及恶性病变(negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy,NILM) 87.51％,意义不明的非典型鳞状细胞(atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance,ASCUS)5.47％,低级别鳞状上皮内瘤变(low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,LSIL)3.51％,不除外高级别鳞状上皮内瘤变的非典型细胞(atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL,ASC-H)0.52％,高级别鳞状上皮内瘤变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)2.99％.HPV阳性中异常细胞学结果的比例明显高于HPV阴性,而NILM的比例低于HPV阴性,P＜0.001.随着细胞学异常程度的加重,HPV阳性率逐渐增高,差异有统计学意义,x2值分别为611.089、512.036和767.260,P值均＜0.001.E6/E7组中NILM的HPV阳性率为8.02％,合计阳性率为14.73％,均较HC2及分型组低,x2=30.174,P=0.000;x2 =22.991,P＜0.001. E6/E7组CIN2+/CIN3+检出率分别为5.92％和1.20％,3组间比较差异无统计学意义,x2值分别为1.499和0.711,P值分别为0.473和0.701.E6/E7阳性率在正常至浸润性宫颈癌(invasive cervical cancer,ICC)之间随病变程度加重而升高,P＜0.05.在正常病理结果中E6/E7阳性率为61.36％,低于HC2和HPV分型,x2=15.767,P＜0.001;其余病理结果中各组间HPV阳性率差异无统计学意义,P＞0.05.结论 hrHPV E6/E7 mRNA较之HC2和HPV分型能在不降低宫颈病变检出率的前提下减少一过性HPV感染的检出率,提示其在宫颈筛查中具有潜在应用价值.     

1997例宫颈管刮术结果分析

目的　探讨宫颈管刮术 (ECC)在诊断宫颈癌及癌前病变中的价值 ,以及阴道镜检时常规行ECC的必要性。方法　对宫颈癌高发地区 35～ 4 5岁妇女共 1997人行宫颈细胞学涂片、阴道镜检查及多点活检 ,活检后常规行ECC。结果　ECC的总阳性率为 1.6 % ,其中细胞学阴性者的ECC阳性率为 0 .3% ,细胞学阳性者为 5 .3% ,细胞学异常程度越高 ,ECC阳性率越高。阴道镜检不满意者的ECC阳性率为 9.1% ,阴道镜检满意者为 1.3% ,二者差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。阴道镜检阴性者ECC阳性率为 0 .6 % ,镜下诊断为低度鳞状上皮内病变 (LSIL)者的ECC阳性率为 0 .9% ,高度鳞状上皮内病变 (HSIL)者为 2 4 .1% ,镜检阴性及LSIL者的ECC阳性率显著低于HSIL者。宫颈活检病理为LSIL者的ECC阳性率为 3.3% ,HSIL者为 2 2 .2 % ,鳞癌者为 5 0 .0 % ,三者间差异有显著性。 316例细胞学阳性而阴道镜检未见异常 ,其中 8例 (2 .5 % )ECC阳性 ,8例中 3例细胞学为高度病变。结论　细胞学诊断为HSIL或有更严重的病变时 ,应常规行ECC ;阴道镜检为高度病变者应行ECC ;细胞学阳性而阴道镜检不满意的患者须行ECC。     

Histopathologic follow-up and human papillomavirus DNA test results in 290 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test results

BACKGROUND:

The study documents histopathologic outcomes and high‐risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) test results in a large cohort of patients with high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) liquid‐based cytology (LBC) Pap test results.

METHODS:

A total of 352 patients with HSIL results (338 cervical and 14 vaginal) who had hrHPV testing and 290 patients with biopsy follow‐up were studied. hrHPV detection rates were compared at different ages, with or without an endocervical/transformation zone sample (EC/TZS), and for cervical and vaginal HSIL Pap smears. Histopathologic follow‐up findings were also compared. hrHPV‐negative HSIL slides were re‐evaluated in a blinded manner.

RESULTS:

A total of 325 of 338 (96.2%) cervical HSIL and 12 of 14 (87.5%) vaginal HSIL tested hrHPV‐positive. A total of 271 of 281 (96.4%) EC/TZS‐positive cervical HSIL and 54 of 57 (94.7%) EC/TZS‐negative cervical HSIL tested hrHPV‐positive. The percentage of hrHPV‐positive HSIL declined slightly with increasing age. 197 of 273 (72.3%) hrHPV‐positive cervical HSIL had histopathologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3+ follow‐up, including 8 squamous carcinomas, compared with 4 of 12 (33.3%) hrHPV‐negative HSIL with CIN2/3 (no carcinomas). 167 of 241 (69.2%) EC/TZS‐positive HSIL had CIN2/3+ follow‐up, compared with 34 of 44 (77.3%) EC/TZS‐negative HSIL. Equivocal HSIL morphology characterized some HPV‐negative HSIL without CIN2/3+ follow‐up.

CONCLUSIONS:

hrHPV was detected in LBC vials from 96.2% of 338 cervical HSIL and 85.7% of 14 vaginal HSIL. CIN2/3+ was significantly more likely with hrHPV‐positive cervical HSIL than with hrHPV‐negative cervical HSIL. Presence or absence of an EC/TZS did not significantly impact HSIL hrHPV or CIN2/3+ rates. Some hrHPV‐negative HSIL cases may represent HSIL cytologic mimics. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Why is high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia under-diagnosed on cytology in a quarter of cases? Analysis of smear characteristics in discrepant cases

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of cervical cytology has been questioned due to high false negative rate. In order to improve the sensitivity of cytology it is prudent to analyze the factors which hamper with the diagnosis of high grade lesions. AIMS: To study the cyto-histologic agreement in High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of uterine cervix and to analyze the smear characteristics in discrepant cases. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Cervical smears of 100 histology proven cases of Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III) were retrieved and reviewed to study cyto-histologic agreement in the diagnosis of high grade lesions. The discrepant smears, undercalled on cytology, were further analyzed to determine the reasons for misinterpretations. Statistical analysis was performed to find out any significant factors for discrepancies. RESULTS: Cytology was able to correctly identify 74 HSILs while in 26 cases a diagnosis of Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) or below was given. On review, 16 of these non correlating cases could be reclassified as HSIL on cytology while in 10 the diagnosis of LSIL or less persisted. 12/16 (75%) discrepant cases, reclassified as HSIL represented interpretive errors. Sampling errors (7/10) and air drying (5/10) were more frequent in under diagnosed cases. The statistical analysis did not yield any significant differences in the two review groups. CONCLUSION: 26% of HSIL cases were underdiagnosed on cervical smears. The major confounding factors responsible for under interpretation on cytology included air drying artifacts and metaplastic maturation of abnormal cells.     

Performance of HPV DNA Testing with Hybrid Capture 2 in Triaging Women with Minor Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand

Background: Minor cervical cytologic abnormalities include atypical squamous cells of undeterminedsignificance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Approximately 10-20% of womenwith minor cytologic abnormalities have histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (HSIL+).In Thailand, women with minor cytologic abnormalities have a relatively high risk of cervical cancer, and referralfor colposcopy has been suggested. A triage test is useful in the selection of women at risk for histologic HSIL+ toreduce the colposcopy burden. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of high-risk HPV DNA test intriage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. Materials and Methods: All womenwith ASC-US/LSIL cytology who were referred to our colposcopy clinic from October 2010 to February 2014were included. HPV DNA testing was performed using Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2). All patients received colposcopicexamination. Accuracy values of HC2 in predicting the presence of histologic HSIL+ were calculated. Results:There were 238 women in this study (121 ASC-US and 117 LSIL). The HC2 positivity rate was significantlyhigher in the LSIL group than in ASC-US group (74.8% versus 41.0%, p<0.001). Histologic HSIL+ was detectedin 9 women (7.4%) in the ASC-US group and 16 women (13.7%) in the LSIL group (p=0.141). There was nohistologic HSIL+ detected among HC2-negative cases (sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%). Theperformance of HC2 triage was highest among women aged >50 years with ASC-US cytology. An increase in thecut-off threshold for positive HC2 resulted in a substantial decrease of sensitivity and negative predictive value.Conclusions: HPV DNA testing with HC2 shows very high sensitivity and negative predictive value in triage ofwomen with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. An increase of the cut-off thresholdfor HC2 triage is not recommended in this region.     

Combined CADM1 and MAL promoter methylation analysis to detect (pre-)malignant cervical lesions in high-risk HPV-positive women

Given the lower specificity for high-grade cervical lesions of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing compared to cytology, additional triage testing for hrHPV test-positive women is needed to detect high-grade cervical lesions. Here, we tested whether combined methylation analysis for cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1) and T-lymphocyte maturation associated protein (MAL), both functionally involved in cervical carcinogenesis, could serve as such a triage marker. Four quantitative methylation-specific PCRs (qMSP), two for CADM1 (regions M12 and M18) and MAL (regions M1 and M2) each, were applied to 261 cervical tissue specimens ranging from no neoplasia to carcinoma. When qMSPs were combined and positivity for at least one of the qMSPs in the combination was taken into account, the highest positivity rates for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) lesions (97%) and squamous cell- and adeno-carcinomas (99%) were obtained by combining a single CADM1 marker with a single MAL marker. Subsequent qMSP analysis of 70 GP5+/6+-PCR hrHPV-positive scrapings revealed that a two-marker panel consisting of CADM1-M18 and MAL-M1 was most discriminative, detecting 90% of women with CIN3 (n = 30), whereas it showed a positive result in only 13.5% of women without cervical disease (n = 40). Finally, we applied hrHPV GP5+/6+-PCR testing followed by CADM1-M18/MAL-M1 methylation analysis to a cohort of 79 women visiting the outpatient colposcopy clinic. hrHPV testing revealed a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 33% for CIN3+. Additional CADM1-M18/MAL-M1 methylation analysis on the hrHPV-positive women increased the specificity to 78% with a sensitivity of 70%. In conclusion, the methylation marker panel CADM1-M18 and MAL-M1 may serve as an alternative molecular triage tool for hrHPV-positive women.     

Reliable identification of women with CIN3+ using hrHPV genotyping and methylation markers in a cytology-screened referral population

Cervical screening aims to identify women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 (HSIL/CIN2-3) or invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Identification of women with severe premalignant lesions or ICC (CIN3+) could ensure their rapid treatment and prevent overtreatment. We investigated high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection with genotyping and methylation of FAM19A4/miR124-2 for detection of CIN3+ in 538 women attending colposcopy for abnormal cytology. All women had an additional cytology with hrHPV testing (GP5+/6+-PCR-EIA+), genotyping (HPV16/18, HPV16/18/31/45), and methylation analysis (FAM19A4/miR124-2) and at least one biopsy. CIN3+ detection was studied overall and in women <30 (n = 171) and ≥30 years (n = 367). Positivity for both rather than just one methylation markers increased in CIN3, and all ICC was positive for both. Overall sensitivity and specificity for CIN3+ were, respectively, 90.3% (95%CI 81.3–95.2) and 31.8% (95%CI 27.7–36.1) for hrHPV, 77.8% (95%CI 66.9–85.8) and 69.3% (95%CI 65.0–73.3) for methylation biomarkers and 93.1% (95%CI 84.8–97.0) and 49.4% (95%CI 44.8–53.9) for combined HPV16/18 and/or methylation positivity. For CIN3, hrHPV was found in 90.9% (95%CI 81.6–95.8), methylation positivity in 75.8% (95%CI 64.2–84.5) and HPV16/18 and/or methylation positivity in 92.4% (95%CI 83.5–96.7). In women aged ≥30, the sensitivity of combined HPV16/18 and methylation was increased (98.2%, 95%CI 90.6–99.7) with a specificity of 46.3% (95%CI 40.8–51.9). Combination of HPV16/18 and methylation analysis was very sensitive and offered improved specificity for CIN3+, opening the possibility of rapid treatment for these women and follow-up for women with potentially regressive, less advanced, HSIL/CIN2 lesions.     

A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low-resolution images: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Transmission over the Internet of low-resolution images acquired by automated screening of cervical cytology specimens has the potential to provide remote interpretation and, hence, centralization of a cytology workforce. METHODS: Liquid-based cervical cytology slides were scanned using the FocalPoint(R) System. Ten black-and-white images that had the greatest probability of containing abnormality were acquired from each of 32 reference slides (16 negative samples, 3 samples of atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance, 5 samples of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL], 5 samples of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL], 1 adenocarcinoma in situ sample, and 2 carcinoma samples) and were transmitted as e-mail attachments in JPEG format to remote reading stations. The slides were interpreted independently by two pathologists and were assigned to either of two groups: 1) suspicious for >or=HSIL or 2) 相似文献