Updated Assessment of the Association of the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism with Lung Cancer Risk in the Chinese Population

Background: Published studies have reported relationships between X-ray repair cross-complementing group1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and lung cancer risk in Chinese population. However, the epidemiologicalresults remained controversial. The objective of this study was to clarify the association of XRCC1 Arg399Glnpolymorphism with lung cancer risk in the Chinese population. Materials and Methods: Systematic searches wereperformed through the database of Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and WanFang MedicalOnline. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated to estimate the strength ofthe association. Results: Overall, we observed an increased lung cancer risk among subjects carrying XRCC1codon 399 Gln/Gln genotype (OR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.09-1.71) in the Chinese population on the basis of 19 studieswith 5,416 cases and 5,782 controls. We did not observe any association between XRCC1 codon 399 Arg/Gln andArg/Gln+Gln/Gln polymorphisms and lung cancer risk (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.92-1.08 and OR=1.05, 95%CI: 0.97-1.13, respectively). Limiting the analysis to studies with controls in agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium(HWE), we observed an increased lung cancer risk among subjects carrying XRCC1 codon 399 Gln/Gln genotype(OR=1.18, 95%CI: 1.01-1.38). When stratified by source of control, we observed an increased lung cancer riskamong subjects carrying XRCC1 codon 399 Arg/Gln+Gln/Gln genotype on the basis of hospitalized patient-basedcontrols (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42) and among subjects carrying XRCC1 codon 399 Gln/Gln genotype onthe basis of healthy subject-based controls (OR=1.22, 95%CI: 1.04-1.43). Conclusions: Our findings indicatedthat certain XRCC1 Arg399Gln variants might affect the susceptibility of lung cancer in Chinese population.Larger sample size studies are required to confirm our findings.     

XRCC1 Arg399Gln基因多态性与中国人群肝细胞癌易感性的Meta分析

目的 探讨XRCC1 Arg399Gln基因多态性与肝细胞癌（HCC）易感性的关系。方法 计算机检索PubMed、中国生物医学文献（CBM）、中国知网、万方及维普等数据库,收集有关XRCC1 Arg399Gln基因多态性与HCC易感性关系的病例对照研究,提取纳入文献的相关数据进行Meta分析,以病例组与对照组XRCC1 Arg399Gln各种基因模型的比值比（OR）为效应指标,发表偏倚采用Eggers检验和Beggs检验。结果 共17篇文献符合纳入标准,累计病例数3301例,对照组4156例。XRCC1 Arg399Gln基因多态性与中国人群HCC易感性有明显关联性（G/G vs. A/A：OR=1.32,95％CI：1.13～1.54,P=0.000;A/G vs. A/A：OR=1.25,95％CI：1.10～1.41,P=0.000;A/G+G/G vs. A／A：OR=1.22,95％CI：1.09～1.36,P=0000;G／G vs. A／A+A／G：OR=1.20,95％CI：1.04～1.39,P=0.014）。根据健康对照组来源不同的亚组分析中,所有地区或者控制人口来源医院的研究结果均显示,XRCC1 Arg399Gln 基因多态性与HCC易感性有明显关联性,但控制人口非医院来源的研究结果显示XRCC1 Arg399Gln 基因多态性与HCC易感性无明显关联性;根据地区不同分组的亚组分析中,在广西地区,除隐性遗传模型外（G/G vs. A/A+A/G：OR=1.25,95％CI：0.95～1.65,P=0.115）,其余遗传模型结果显示XRCC1 Arg399Gln基因多态性与广西地区HCC易感性有明显相关性（G/G vs. A/A：OR=1.47,95％CI：1.10～1.95,P=0.009;A/G vs. A/A：OR=1.35,95％CI：1.17～1.56,P=0.000;A/G+G/G vs.A／A：OR=133,95％CI：1.16～1.52,P=0.000）。结论 XRCC1 Arg399Gln 基因多态性可能增加中国人群HCC的易感性,尤其在广西地区。     

Evaluation of DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphism in prediction and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma risk

We conducted a case-control study in China to clarify the association between XRCC1-Arg399Gln polymorphism and HCC risk. A total of 150 cases and 158 controls were selected from the the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from May 2008 to May 2010. XRCC1-Arg399Gln polymorphism was based upon duplex polymerase-chain-reaction with the confronting-two-pair primer (PCR-CTPP) method. All analyses were performed using the STATA statistical package. A significantly increased risk was associated with the Arg/Gln genotype (adjusted OR 1.78, 95%CI=1.13-2.79) compared with genotype Arg/Arg. In contrast, the Gln/Gln genotype had non-significant increased risk of HCC with adjusted OR (95%CI) of 1.69 (0.93-2.66). A significant association was found between positive HBsAg and Arg/Gln, with an OR of 3.43 (95% CI=1.45-8.13). Patients carrying Gln/Gln genotypes showed significantly lower median survival than Arg/Arg genotypes (HR=1.38, 95% CI=1.04-1.84). Further Kaplan-Meier analysis showed decreased median survival in Arg/Gln+Gln/Gln genotype carriers in comparison to Arg/Arg carriers (HR=1.33, 95% CI=1.02-1.76). In conclusion, we observed that XRCC1-Arg399Cln polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to HCC, and XRCC1 Gln allele genotype showed significant prognostic associations.     

Polymorphism of DNA repair gene XRCC1 and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Chinese population

Aim: We conducted a case-control study in China to clarify the association between the XRCC1-Arg399Gln polymorphism and HCC risk. Methods: A total of 202 cases and 236 controls were selected from the the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from May 2008 to May 2010. Assessment of the XRCC1-Arg399Gln polymorphism was based upon duplex polymerase-chain-reactions with the confronting-two-pair primer (PCR-CTPP) method. All analyses were performed using the STATA statistical package. Results: A significant increase in risk was associated with the Arg/Gln genotype (adjusted OR 1.55, 95%CI=1.03-2.57) compared with Arg/Arg. However, the Gln/Gln genotype had non-significant increased risk of HCC with adjusted OR (95%CI) of 1.34(0.67-2.38). There was also a significant increasewith the Arg/Gln genotype among HCC patients above 50 years old (OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.14-3.57). Additionally, the risk of HCC was moderately increased in drinkers with Arg/Gln genotype compared with never drinkers, and the adjusted OR (95% CI) was 1.89 (1.13-3.45). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a polymorphism in a DNA repair gene may influence the risk of HCC. The XRCC1 codon Arg/Gln was thuis associated with an increased risk of HCC, especiallyin patients above 50 years old and/or with a drinking habit.     

An updated meta-analysis between the association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk

Background: Various studies have evaluated the relationship between X-ray repair cross-complementinggroup 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk, but the conclusionshave been inconsistent and underpowered. The purpose of this updated meta-analysis was to examine whetherXRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism confers susceptibility to HCC. Methods: Eligible studies extracted fromPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, VIP (chinese) and CNKI (chinese) up to November 2013 were included inthe study. Pooled odds ratio (OR) together with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated to evaluateXRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HCC risk. Results: Finally, 21 studies with 4,170 cases and 5,030controls were involved in our meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that there was significant associationbetween Arg399Gln polymorphism and HCC risk under two contrast models in overall populations (AG vs GG:OR=1.265, 95%CI=1.036-1.545, p=0.021; AA+AG vs GG: OR=1.240, 95%CI=1.021-1.506, p=0.030). In subgroupanalyses, significant association was found in Asians (A vs G: OR=1.175, 95%CI=1.013-1.362, p=0.033; AG vsGG: OR=1.317, 95%CI=1.070-1.622, p=0.009; AA+AG vs GG: OR=1.289, 95%CI=1.055-1.575, p=0.013) andCaucasians (A vs G: OR=0.591, 95%CI=0.361-0.966, p=0.036; AA+AG vs GG: OR=0.468, 95%CI=0.234-0.934,p=0.031). Conclusions: The results suggest that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may increase HCC riskespecially among Asians. However, XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism might act as a protective role againstHCC among Caucasians.     

XRCC1 Arg399Gln gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies

Background: The Arg399Gln polymorphism in the XRCC1 DNA repair gene is likely to be involved with the development of breast cancer (BC). However, there have been inconsistent reports of association. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the published papers. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 44 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 20,841 BC cases and 22,688 controls in dominant (GlnGln+ArgGln vs. ArgArg), recessive (GlnGln vs. ArgGln+ArgArg), and co-dominant (GlnGln vs. ArgArg) inheritance models. Analyses of Asian, African and Caucasian ethnic subgroups was also conducted. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of associations. Results: Our overall analyses indicated Arg399Gln to be associated with a trend of increased BC risk when using recessive (OR=1.15, 95%CI: 1.05–1.27), and co-dominant models (OR=1.15, 95%CI: 1.04-1.27) to analyze the data. In ethnic subgroups, Arg399Gln significantly increased BC risk in Asians (OR=1.54, 95%CI: 1.18–2.01) when using recessive model analysis, in Africans (OR=1.30, 95%CI: 1.07–1.60) when using dominant model analysis, and in Asians (OR=1.50, 95%CI: 1.15–1.97) and Africans (OR=1.80, 95%CI: 1.08-3.02) when using the co-dominant model analysis. Conclusions: From our meta-analysis of data from 44 publications, we conclude that XRCC1 Arg399Gln allele is a risk factor for the development breast cancer, especially among Asian and African populations.     

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 Arg399Gln gene polymorphism and susceptibility to colorectal cancer:a meta-analysis

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1), a DNA repair enzyme, plays a crucial role in the base excision repair by generating a single nucleotide repair patch. It has been demonstrated that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln gene polymorphism was associated with variations in XRCC1 enzyme activity. The aim of this study was to quantitatively summarize the association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and susceptibility to colorectal cancer (CRC). A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted for studies on the association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and CRC risk. Summary odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) was estimated, in a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model when appropriate, to assess the association. Totally, 26 case–control studies with 6,979 cases and 11,470 controls were included into this meta-analysis. The pooled results of total studies showed that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism was significantly associated with increased risk of CRC in all genetic contrast models (OR_{A vs. G}?=?1.13, 95 %CI 1.03–1.23, P _OR?=?0.008; OR_{Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg}?=?1.24, 95 %CI 1.04–1.46, P _OR?=?0.015; OR_{Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Gln + Arg/Arg}?=?1.19, 95 %CI 1.03–1.38, P _OR?=?0.021; OR_{Gln/Gln + Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg}?=?1.14, 95 %CI 1.02–1.28, P _OR?=?0.022), except for the additive contrast model (OR_{Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg}?=?1.11, 95 %CI 0.99–1.25, P _OR?=?0.064). The statistically significant association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and CRC risk was observed among studies with high quality and in Asians, but not in Caucasians. Sensitivity analyses by sequential omission of any individual studies further identified the significant association. Publication bias was inexistent in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is associated with increased risk of CRC.     

Association of XPD and XRCC1 Genetic Polymorphisms with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk

Aim: XRCC1 and XPD are two major repair genes involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), whichis reported to be associated with risk of several cancers. We explored the association of XRCC1 and XPDpolymorphisms with the risk of HCC. Methods: A total of 410 cases with HCC and 410 health controls werecollected. XRCC1 Arg194Trp, XRCC1 Arg399Gln, XPD Lys751Gln and XPD Asp312Asn genotyping wasperformed by duplex polymerase-chain-reaction with the confronting-two-pair primer (PCR-CTPP) method.Results: XRCC1 194Trp/Trp was strongly significantly associated with an increased risk of HCC cancer whencompared with the wide-type genotype (OR=2.26, 95% CI=(1.23-5.38). Individuals carrying the XRCC1 399Gln/Gln showed increased risk of HCC (OR=1.74, 95%CI=1.06-2.74). The XPD 751Gln/Gln and Gln allele genotypewere associated with strong elevated susceptibility to HCC (OR=3.51 and 1.42, respectively). Conclusion: Theseresults suggest that polymorphisms in XRCC1 and XPD may have functional significance in risk of HCC.     

Genetic Risk of DNA Repair Gene Polymorphisms (XRCC1 and XRCC3) for High Risk Human Papillomavirus Negative Cervical Cancer in Northeast Thailand

To identify risk factors other than high risk human papillomavirus infection for the development of cervicalcancer, functional polymorphisms of DNA repair genes, XRCC1 Arg399Gln and Arg194Trp and XRCC3Thr241Met, were studied among Northeastern Thai women. Cases (n=111) were defined as squamous cellcervical cancer and controls (n=118) were recruited from healthy women without cervical abnormalities. TheXRCC1 194Trp/Trp genotype significantly increased the risk for cervical cancer (OR=5.52; 95%CI=1.14-26.64;p=0.03). Among the HPV infection negative group, significantly higher risks for cervical cancer were visualizedfor XRCC1 399Arg/Gln (adjusted OR=3.69; 95%CI=1.04-13.06; p=0.04) and XRCC1 194Arg/Trp (adjustedOR=4.13; 95%CI=1.13-15.12; p=0.03). This study indicates that variant types of DNA repair genes play partialroles in modifying individual susceptibility to cervical cancer. Since cervical cancer is a multi-factorial disease,the contribution of DNA repair enzymes to the development of cervical cancer, if it exists may be concealed byHPV infection.     

Assessment of the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and lung cancer in Chinese

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is one of the major DNA repair proteins involved in the base excision repair and plays an important role in the maintenance of genomic integrity. Polymorphisms in XRCC1 may alter the function and repair capacity of XRCC1 protein which further results in the genetic instability and lung carcinogenesis. Previous studies investigating the relationship between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and lung cancer risk in Chinese yielded contradictory results. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism on lung cancer. The association was assessed by calculating the pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI). Nineteen studies with a total of 12,835 participants were included into this meta-analysis. Overall, there was an obvious association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and increased risk of lung cancer under three genetic models (Gln vs. Arg: OR?=?1.13, 95 %CI 1.01–1.25, P?=?0.029; GlnGln vs. ArArg: OR?=?1.41, 95 %CI 1.07–1.84, P?=?0.013; GlnGln vs. ArArg/ArgGln: OR?=?1.37, 95 %CI 1.07–1.76, P?=?0.013). Meta-analysis of 18 studies with high quality also found that there was an obvious association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and increased risk of lung cancer under three genetic models. There was no obvious risk of bias in the meta-analysis. Data from the current meta-analysis support the obvious association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and increased risk of lung cancer in Chinese.     

X-Ray Repair Cross-Complementing Group 1(XRCC1) Genetic Polymorphisms and Thyroid Carcinoma Risk: a Meta-Analysis

A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with thyroidcancer risk, but the results have been inconsistent. Thus we performed the present meta-analysis to clarify thisissue based on all of the evidence available to date. Relevant studies were retrieved by searching PubMed andstatistical analysis conducted using Stata software. Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis (1,620 casesand 3,557 controls). There were 6 studies (932 cases and 2,270 controls) of the Arg194Trp polymorphism, 7 studies(1432 cases and 3356 controls) of the Arg280His polymorphism and 9 studies (1,620 cases and 3,557 controls) forthe Arg399Gln polymorphism. No association of XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Arg280His and Arg399Gln polymorphismwith thyroid cancer risk was observed in the overall analysis. However, subgroup analysis revealed: 1) anelevated risk in aa vs AA analysis (OR=2.03, 95%CI= 1.24-3.31) and recessive genetic model analysis (OR=1.93,95%CI= 1.20-3.08) in the larger sample size trials for XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism; 2) a decreased thyroidcancer risk on subgroup analysis based on ethnicity in Aa vs AA analysis (OR=0.84, 95%CI= 0.72-0.98) and ina dominant genetic model (OR=0.84, 95%CI= 0.72-0.97) in Caucasian populations for the XRCC1 Arg399Glnpolymorphism; 3) a decreased thyroid cancer risk on subgroup analysis based on design type in Aa vs AA analysis(OR=0.72, 95% CI= 0.54-0.97) among the PCC trials for the Arg399Gln polymorphism. Our results suggest thatthe XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with decreased thyroid cancer risk among Caucasiansand XRCC1 Arg194Trp may be associated with a tendency for increased thyroid cancer risk in the two largersample size trials.     

XRCC1 Arg399Gln variation and leukemia susceptibility: evidence from 2,647 cases and 5,518 controls

Previous reports implicate XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism as a possible risk factor for several cancers. Increasing studies have been conducted on the association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms with susceptibility to leukemia. However, conflicting results have been generated. The goal of the present study was to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. Meta-analyses assessing the association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln variation with leukemia were conducted, and subgroup analyses on ethnicity and clinical types were further performed. Eligible studies were identified for the period up to February 2013. Consequently, 16 publications including 17 case–control studies with 2,647 cases and 5,518 controls were selected for analysis. The overall data indicated a significant association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism with leukemia risk (Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR?=?1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?1.08–1.74; dominant model: OR?=?1.23, 95%CI?=?1.03–1.46; recessive model: OR?=?1.23, 95%CI?=?1.06–1.44). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, Gln allele may increase leukemia susceptibility among Asians (Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR?=?1.82, 95%CI?=?1.19–2.78; dominant model: OR?=?1.53, 95%CI?=?1.00–2.33; recessive model: OR?=?1.51, 95%CI?=?1.11–2.06), but not Caucasians or mixed ethnicities. In the subgroup analysis by clinical types, increased risk was observed in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) subgroup (Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR?=?1.45, 95%CI?=?1.09–1.93; recessive model: OR?=?1.30, 95%CI?=?1.00–1.69), but not in acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or chronic myeloid leukemia subgroups, respectively. Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism might be a low-penetrant risk factor for leukemia, particularly among Asians. Homozygous Gln/Gln alleles might have a correlation with increased ALL susceptibility.     

Association of DNA Base-excision Repair XRCC1, OGG1 and APE1 Gene Polymorphisms with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Susceptibility in a Chinese Population

Background: Numerous carcinogens and reactive oxygen species (ROS) may cause DNA damage includingoxidative base lesions that lead to risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Genetic susceptibility has been reported toplay a key role in the development of this disease. The base excision repair (BER) pathway can effectively removeoxidative lesions, maintaining genomic stability and normal expression, with X-ray repair crosscomplementing1(XRCC1), 8-oxoguanine glycosylase-1 (OGG1) and apurinic/apyimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) playingimportant roles. Aims: To analyze polymorphisms of DNA BER genes (OOG1, XRCC1 and APE1) and exploretheir associations, and the combined effects of these variants, with risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Materialsand Methods: We detected SNPs of XRCC1 (Arg399Gln), OGG1 (Ser326Cys), APE1 (Asp148Glu and -141T/G)using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with peripheral blood samples from 231 patients with NPC and 300healthy people, furtherly analyzing their relations with the risk of NPC in multivariate logistic regression models.Results: After adjustment for sex and age, individuals with the XRCC1 399Gln/Gln (OR=1.96; 95%CI:1.02-3.78; p=0.04) and Arg/Gln (OR=1.87; 95%CI:1.29-2.71; p=0.001) genotype variants demonstrated a significantlyincreased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with those having the wild-type Arg/Arg genotype. APE1-141G/G was associated with a significantly reduced risk of NPC (OR=0.40;95%CI:0.18–0.89) in the smokinggroup. The OR calculated for the combination of XRCC1 399Gln and APE1 148Gln, two homozygous variants,was significantly additive for all cases (OR=2.09; 95% CI: 1.27-3.47; p=0.004). Conclusion: This is the first studyto focus on the association between DNA base-excision repair genes (XRCC1, OGG1 and APE1) polymorphismand NPC risk. The XRCC1 Arg399Gln variant genotype is associated with an increased risk of NPC. APE1-141G/G may decrease risk of NPC in current smokers. The combined effects of polymorphisms within BERgenes of XRCC1 399Gln and APE1 148Gln may contribute to a high risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.     

No association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: Iowa Women's Health Study

BACKGROUND: Genetic variation in DNA repair may contribute to differences in the susceptibility of several cancers. We evaluated two polymorphisms in the base excision repair pathway (BER) (XRCC1; Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln) and one polymorphism in the double strand DNA repair pathway (XRCC3; Thr241Met) for their association with breast cancer risk. METHODS: The association was analyzed in a nested case control study of 460 breast cancer cases and 324 cancer-free controls within the Iowa Women's Health Cohort. DNA was obtained from blood samples or paraffin embedded tissues (PET) and all samples were genotyped by one of three genotyping platforms-PCR-RFLP, PCR-INVADER, or Sequenom. RESULTS: None of the three polymorphisms studied were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (XRCC1: Arg194Trp (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.78-1.88); Arg399Gln (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.80-1.79); XRCC3: Thr241Met (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.76-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that independently these polymorphisms of XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes do not contribute significantly to the genetic susceptibility of breast cancer.     

Interaction of XRCC1 and XPD Gene Polymorphisms with Lifestyle and Environmental Factors Regarding Susceptibility to Lung Cancer in a High Incidence Population in North East India

Background: This study aimed to explore the role of XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and XPD (Lys751Gln) genepolymorphisms, lifestyle and environmental factors as well as their possible interactions in propensity to developlung cancer in a population with high incidence from North East India. Materials and Methods: A total of 272lung cancer cases and 544 controls were collected and XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and XPD (Lys751Gln) genotypes wereanalyzed using a polymerase chain reaction based restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Conditionalmultiple logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervalsafter adjusting for confounding factors. Results: The combined Gln/Gln genotype of XRCC1 and XPD genes(OR=2.78, CI=1.05-7.38; p=0.040) was significantly associated with increased risk for lung cancer. Interactionof XRCC1Gln/Gln genotype with exposure of wood combustion (OR=2.56, CI=1.16-5.66; p=0.020), exposure ofcooking oil fumes (OR=3.45, CI=1.39-8.58; p=0.008) and tobacco smoking (OR=2.54, CI=1.21-5.32; p=0.014) andinteraction of XPD with betel quid chewing (OR=2.31, CI=1.23-4.32; p=0.009) and tobacco smoking (OR=2.13,CI=1.12-4.05; p=0.022) were found to be significantly associated with increased risk for lung cancer. Conclusions:Gln/Gln alleles of both XRCC1 and XPD genes appear to amplify the effects of household exposure, smokingand betel quid chewing on lung cancer risk in the study population.     

DNA修复基因XRCC1的399位点多态性同肺癌易感性关系的Meta分析

目的综合评价DNA修复基因XRCC1(X-raycross-complementinggroup1)的399位点多态性同肺癌易感性的关系。方法检索中国生物医学数据库和Medline,获得有关XRCC1基因399位点多态性同肺癌易感性关系的研究结果,并进行Meta分析。所有文献均采用病例对照研究,以非条件Logistic回归校正年龄、性别和吸烟状况等混杂因素后的OR值为效应指标,对文献进行评价筛选、异质性检验。利用Meta分析软件RevMan4·2对各研究原始结果进行统计处理,并计算合并OR值及其95%可信区间。结果本次Meta分析共纳入15项研究,累计病例6818例,对照7610例。Arg/Gln和Gln/Gln等位基因同Arg/Arg比较,OR值分别为0·99(95%CI0·91~1·06)和1·04(95%CI0·92~1·17),Z值分别为-0·37和0·67,对应的P值分别为0·71和0·50。结论尚无足够证据证明DNA修复基因XRCC1的399位点多态性同肺癌易感性有关。     

Association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Asian population

To investigate the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of eligible case–control studies. Eligible studies were identified from the PubMed, Embase, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to March 2013. The odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism in hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma cases compared with those in controls were calculated. The meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effect methods according to the absence or presence of heterogeneity. This meta-analysis included 1,558 cases with hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and 1,338 controls. Meta-analysis of available data showed that there was no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and risk of hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma under all contrast models (Gln vs. Arg: fixed-effect OR?=?0.92, 95 % CI 0.82–1.04, P?=?0.18; GlnGln vs. ArgArg: random-effect OR?=?0.79, 95 % CI 0.50–1.25, P?=?0.32; GlnGln/ArgGln vs. ArgArg: fixed-effect OR?=?0.92, 95 % CI 0.79–1.07, P?=?0.28; and GlnGln vs. ArgArg/ArgGln: random-effect OR?=?0.83, 95 % CI 0.52–1.34, P?=?0.45). Sensitivity analysis further showed that there was no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and risk of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma under all contrast models (Gln vs. Arg: fixed-effect OR?=?0.93, 95 % CI 0.82–1.05, P?=?0.25; GlnGln vs. ArgArg: fixed-effect OR?=?0.86, 95 % CI 0.64–1.16, P?=?0.32; GlnGln/ArgGln vs. ArgArg: fixed-effect OR?=?0.93, 95 % CI 0.80–1.10, P?=?0.41; and GlnGln vs. ArgArg/ArgGln: fixed-effect OR?=?0.85, 95 % CI 0.63–1.13, P?=?0.26). Our meta-analysis of the available data did not find an obvious effect of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism on hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. More well-designed studies with large sample are needed to further verify the effect.     

Prediction Value of XRCC 1 Gene Polymorphism on the Survival of Ovarian Cancer Treated by Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective: We conducted a prospective study to test the association between three amino acid substitutionpolymorphismic variants of DNA repair genes, XRCC1 (Arg194Trp), XRCC1(Arg280His) and XRCC1(Arg399Gln), and clinical outcome of ovarian cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods:195 patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer and treated by adjuvant chemotherapy were included in ourstudy. All were followed-up from Jan. 2007 to Jan. 2012. Genotyping of XRCC1 polymorphisms was conductedby TaqMan Gene Expression assays. Results: The XRCC1 194 Trp/Trp genotype conferred a significant riskof death from ovarian cancer when compared with Arg/Arg (HR=1.56, 95%CI=1.04-3.15). Similarly, thosecarrying the XRCC1 399 Gln/Gln genotype had a increased risk of death as compared to the XRCC1 399Arg/Arg genotype with an HR (95% CI) of 1.98 (1.09-3.93). Conclusion: This study is the first to provide evidencethat XRCC1 gene polymorphisms would well be useful as surrogate markers of clinical outcome in ovariancancer cases undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.     

XRCC1 polymorphisms, cooking oil fume and lung cancer in Chinese women nonsmokers

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is one of the major DNA repair proteins involved in the base excision repair (BER) and single-strand break repair (SSBR) pathway. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in XRCC1 may alter protein function and repair capacity, thus lead to genetic instability and carcinogenesis. To establish our understanding of possible relationships between XRCC1 polymorphisms (5'UTR -77T>C, Arg194Trp, Arg280His and Arg399Gln) and the susceptibility to lung cancer among women nonsmokers, we performed a hospital-based case-control study of 350 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer and 350 cancer-free controls, frequency matched by age. Our results showed that exposure to cooking oil fume was associated with increased risk of lung cancer in Chinese women nonsmokers [odds ratio (OR)=2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.80-3.51], P<0.001]. Individuals with homozygous XRCC1 399Gln/Gln genotype (OR=1.75, 95% CI [1.02-3.01]) and XRCC1 -77 combined TC and CC genotype (OR=1.66, 95% CI [1.13-2.42]) showed a slightly higher risk for lung cancer overall. In the subgroup of adenocarcinoma cases, adjusted ORs were increased for individuals with homozygous XRCC1 399Gln/Gln genotype (OR=2.62, 95% CI [1.44-4.79]) and XRCC1 -77 combined TC and CC genotype (OR=1.85, 95% CI [1.19-2.86]). Haplotype analysis showed that T-Trp-Arg-Gln haplotypes were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer among women nonsmokers (OR=2.26, 95% CI [1.38-3.68]), however, we did not observe a statistically significant joint effect of cooking oil fume and 399Gln or -77C variant allele on lung cancer among women nonsmokers. In conclusion, XRCC1 Arg399Gln and T-77C polymorphisms may alter the risk of lung cancer in women nonsmokers in China.     

Polymorphisms of DNA repair gene XRCC1 and hepatocellular carcinoma risk among East Asians: a meta-analysis

Association studies on the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) polymorphisms (Arg194Trp, Arg280His, and Arg399Gln) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have shown conflicting results. The aim of this study was to quantitatively summarize the evidence for such a relationship. Published literatures from PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedicine Database were retrieved. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. Thirteen studies including 3,011 HCC cases and 3,619 controls were included in the meta-analysis of the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HCC risk. The results indicated that Arg399Gln polymorphism was significantly associated with risk of HCC in a codominant model (Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, OR?=?1.32, 95 % CI?=?1.08–1.61; Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, OR?=?1.41, 95 % CI?=?1.12–1.80) and a dominant model (Gln/Gln?+?Arg/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, OR?=?1.39, 95 % CI?=?1.15–1.69), but not in a recessive model (Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Gln?+?Arg/Arg, OR?=?1.13, 95 % CI?=?0.95–1.35). Limiting the analysis to the studies within Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, the results were persistent and robust. When stratifying for region and source of controls, persistent results were observed in any subgroup. No evidence of association of Arg194Trp (980 HCC cases and 966 controls) and Arg280His (1,200 HCC cases and 1,236 controls) with HCC risk was found. No publication bias was found in the present study. The results from the present meta-analysis indicated that the Arg399Gln polymorphisms of XRCC1 may be a genetic susceptibility for HCC in the East Asian population. Further, large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.