Increased risk of developing diabetes in depressive and bipolar disorders?

A few studies have suggested that the prevalence of diabetes is increased for patients with depression and for patients with bipolar disorder compared with the general population. However, no study has been published comparing the risk of getting a diagnosis of diabetes for patients with affective disorders with the risk for patients with other medical illnesses. It was the aim of the present study to investigate whether patients hospitalised for depressive or bipolar disorders are at increased risk of getting a diagnosis of diabetes at readmission compared to patients previously admitted for osteoarthritis. In a nationwide case register study, all patients who got a discharge diagnosis of depression, mania/bipolar disorder or osteoarthritis at first admission in a period from 1977 to 1997 were identified. The probability of getting readmitted and discharged with a diagnosis of diabetes was estimated with competing risks models in survival analysis. In total, 29,035 patients with a diagnosis of depression at first discharge, 6683 patients with mania/mixed episode and 108,525 patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis were identified. The risk of getting readmitted with diabetes was not increased for patients who had previously been admitted with depression or mania/bipolar disorder compared to patients with osteoarthritis. There was no difference in the risks of developing Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.     

The risk of affective disorders in patients with adrenocortical insufficiency

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of affective disorders among patients hospitalised with adrenocortical insufficiency in the study period: 1977-1999. METHOD: Using data from Danish registers, two study cohorts were identified by their ICD diagnoses at discharge from hospital: one comprising all patients with a first hospital admission with an index diagnosis of adrenocortical insufficiency; the other a control cohort comprising all patients with a first hospital admission with an index diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Subsequent admissions to psychiatric hospital wards with discharge ICD diagnoses of affective disorders were used as events of interest. Rates of readmission were estimated using Poisson regression models in survival analyses. Age, sex, duration of time after index discharge, and calendar time were included as co-variables. The primary analysis included all patients with adrenocortical insufficiency. Thereafter, the subgroup of patients with primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison's disease) was investigated separately in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: A study sample of 989 patients with adrenocortical insufficiency and 124,854 patients with osteoarthritis was identified. Eight hundred and fifty-two patients were subsequently readmitted with a diagnosis of affective disorder. Patients with adrenocortical insufficiency had a 2.68 (95% CI: 1.62-4.42) times greater rate of affective disorders and a 2.12 (95% CI: 1.16-3.86) times greater rate of depressive disorder when compared with the rate for patients with osteoarthritis. Patients with Addison's disease had a 2.14 (95% CI: 1.14-4.03) times greater rate of affective disorders, and a 1.71 (95% CI: 0.81-3.63) times greater rate of depressive disorder compared with the rate of patients with osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Patients with adrenocortical insufficiency may be at increased risk of developing severe affective disorders. Conventional replacement therapy with hydrocortisone may not be sufficient to ensure the psychiatric well-being of these patients.     

Dementia in affective disorder: a case-register study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether patients with affective disorder have increased risk of developing dementia compared to other groups of psychiatric patients and compared to the general population. METHOD: In the Danish psychiatric central register, 3363 patients with unipolar affective disorder, 518 patients with bipolar affective disorder, 1025 schizophrenic and 8946 neurotic patients were identified according to the diagnosis at the first ever discharge from psychiatric hospital during the period from 1970 to 1974. The rate of discharge diagnosis of dementia on readmission was estimated during 21 years of follow-up. In addition, the rates were compared with the rates for admission to psychiatric hospitals with a discharge diagnosis of dementia for the total Danish population. RESULTS: Patients with unipolar and with bipolar affective disorder had a greater risk of receiving a diagnosis of dementia than patients with schizophrenia and those with neurosis. All groups of patients had a higher risk of being given a diagnosis of dementia than gender- and age-matched samples of the general population. CONCLUSION: Patients with affective disorder appear to be at increased risk of developing dementia.     

Symptoms predicting inpatient service use among patients with bipolar affective disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Symptoms that were risk factors for hospital readmission among psychiatric inpatients diagnosed as having bipolar affective disorder were evaluated. METHODS: Subjects were 100 persons consecutively admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit at a university-affiliated hospital who met Research Diagnostic Criteria for bipolar I or II disorder or schizoaffective disorder, manic type. Patients were assessed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version (SADS-L) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) within one week of discharge, and their hospitalization status was documented by monthly phone contacts over a period of 15 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (24 percent) were rehospitalized within six months of discharge, and 44 (44 percent) were readmitted within 15 months. Survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model demonstrated that patients with high scores on a BPRS-derived mania factor were at significantly decreased risk of rehospitalization, whereas those scoring high on a factor consistent with neurovegetative depression were at significantly increased risk. A greater number of previous psychiatric admissions and younger age were also associated with significantly increased risk of rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that patients with bipolar disorder presenting with a depressive episode characterized by prominent neurovegetative features should be treated more aggressively with both pharmacotherapy and intensive outpatient services to reduce the relatively high risk of rehospitalization that appears to be associated with this type of depression.     

The impact of antidepressant discontinuation versus antidepressant continuation on 1-year risk for relapse of bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines recommend discontinuation of an antidepressant within 3 to 6 months after remission of depression in patients with bipolar illness. Yet few studies directly compare the impact of antidepressant discontinuation versus antidepressant continuation on the risk for depressive relapse in patients with bipolar disorder who have been successfully treated for a depressive episode. METHOD: In a retrospective chart review, patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder who were treated for an index episode of depression by adding antidepressant medication to ongoing mood stabilizer medications were identified. The risk of depressive relapse in 25 subjects who stopped antidepressant medications after improvement was compared with the risk of depressive relapse in 19 subjects who continued antidepressants after improvement. RESULTS: Termination of antidepressant medication significantly increased the risk of a depressive relapse. Antidepressant continuation was not significantly associated with an increased risk of mania. CONCLUSION: While this study may have been limited by the retrospective nature of the chart review, nonrandomized assignment of treatment, and reliance on unstructured progress notes, it suggests that antidepressant discontinuation may increase the risk of depressive relapse in some patients with bipolar disorder. Further research is needed to clarify whether maintenance antidepressant treatment may be warranted in some patients with bipolar disorder, especially in those with frequent recurrent depressive episodes.     

Increased risk of developing stroke for patients with major affective disorder

Only a few studies have evaluated depressive disorder as a risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. In a hospital discharge register with nation–wide coverage of all hospitals in Denmark we used linkage between the somatic and psychiatric registries to study comorbidity between affective disorders and cerebrovascular diseases in hospitalised patients.The main finding of this study was that patients with depression severe enough to be hospitalised, seem to be at an increased risk of developing cerebrovascular disease. The hazard ratio of getting a diagnosis of stroke after initially having been discharged with a diagnosis of depression was found to be 1.22 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.06–1.41). In the group of patients with manic/bipolar disorder no association was found concerning development of stroke.In elderly with first time depression admitted to hospital, neurological disorders should be carefully evaluated and especially the risk of stroke should be considered.     

Evaluation of bipolar disorder in inpatients with prelingual deafness.

OBJECTIVE: This study retrospectively examined the occurrence of bipolar disorder in patients with prelingual deafness who were hospitalized for a psychiatric disorder. METHOD: The hospital charts since 1983 of all psychiatrically admitted deaf patients were retrospectively evaluated for diagnoses by using DSM-IV criteria. Those with a best-estimate diagnosis of bipolar disorder were compared to those with other diagnoses. RESULTS: There were 28 patients with prelingual deafness who had at least one psychiatric diagnosis from 1983 to 1998. Upon chart review, 11 (39.3%) were diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Patients with bipolar disorder and deafness had rates of inaccurate discharge diagnoses that were similar to those of other deaf patients (70.8% versus 56.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar disorder may be more common in inpatients with prelingual deafness than has been previously described in the literature. Further research regarding the sources contributing to misdiagnosis of psychiatric disorders in this population is warranted.     

Psychotic features in bipolar and unipolar depression

BACKGROUND: While some prior studies have found higher rates of psychotic depression in those with bipolar disorder or a bipolar relative, others have failed to confirm these observations. We examined the relationship of psychotic depression to polarity in several large familial samples of mood disorder. METHODS: A total of 4,724 subjects with major mood disorder in three family studies on the genetics of bipolar I disorder (BPI) or recurrent major depressive disorder (MDDR) were administered semi-structured interviews by clinicians. Determination of psychotic features was based on a report of hallucinations and/or delusions during the most severe depressive episode in the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version or the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies interview. Rates of psychotic depression were calculated by diagnostic category and comparisons were made between diagnoses within and across studies using the generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: A diagnosis of BPI disorder was strongly predictive of psychotic features during depression compared to MDDR [odds ratio (OR) = 4.61, p < 0.0005]. Having bipolar II compared to MDDR was not predictive of psychosis (OR = 1.05, p = 0.260), nor was having a family history of BPI in MDDR subjects (OR = 1.20, p = 0.840). CONCLUSIONS: Psychotic features during a depressive episode increased the likelihood of a BPI diagnosis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. The potential genetic underpinnings of psychotic depression warrant further study.     

拉莫三嗪治疗双相心境障碍对照研究

目的：探讨拉莫三嗪治疗双相情感障碍的疗效与安全性。方法：双相心境障碍患者135例，其中双相抑郁78例，躁狂57例。将患者随机分为3组，每组抑郁相26例，躁狂相19例。疗程32周。前8周为急性期治疗阶段，对照组抑郁相只服选择性5-羟色胺回收抑制剂（SSRI）类抗抑郁剂，躁狂相只服利培酮；拉莫三嗪组在对照组用药的基础上加服拉莫三嗪；碳酸锂组在对照组用药的基础上加服碳酸锂。后24周为巩固治疗阶段，所有患者随机分为两组，只服拉莫三嗪或碳酸锂。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、Young躁狂评定量表（YMRS）、治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）评定疗效及安全性。结果：急性期治疗结束后，无论躁狂相还是抑郁相，拉莫三嗪组和碳酸锂组的临床疗效显著高于对照组（P〈0．01或〈0．05）。巩固治疗阶段两组相比，拉莫三嗪的抗抑郁作用较好，碳酸锂的抗躁狂作用较强。不良反应发生率，碳酸锂组40％，拉莫三嗪组22％。巩固治疗阶段病情复发率，拉莫三嗪组8％，碳酸锂组11％，两组差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论：拉莫三嗪作为心境稳定剂治疗双相情感障碍疗效可靠，不良反应小，与碳酸锂相比，抗抑郁作用更强。     

Major depressive disorder in Parkinson's disease: a register-based study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were at an increased risk of developing major depression compared with patients having other medical illnesses with a comparable degree of disability. METHOD: Case register linkage study of Danish Psychiatric Central Register (DPCR)and Danish National Hospital Register (DNHR). Three study cohorts were identified: all patients with PD, osteoarthritis, and diabetes. The rate of discharge diagnosis of depression on re-admission was estimated using competing risks models in survival analyses. The rates for patients with PD were compared with those of patients with osteoarthritis, and diabetes. RESULTS: The study sample identified 211 245 patients in the hospital registers with one of the index diagnoses. An increased incidence of developing depression was found for women and men throughout their lifetime when this incidence was compared with the control groups. CONCLUSION: The findings support the hypothesis that depression in patients with PD is a consequence of brain dysfunction.     

Sustained unemployment in psychiatric outpatients with bipolar depression compared to major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder

Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Young D, Chelminski I, Dalrymple K. Sustained unemployment in psychiatric outpatients with bipolar depression compared to major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder. Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 856–862. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Objectives: The morbidity associated with bipolar disorder is, in part, responsible for repeated calls for improved detection and recognition. No such clinical commentary exists for improved detection of borderline personality disorder in depressed patients. Clinical experience suggests that borderline personality disorder is as disabling as bipolar disorder; however, no studies have directly compared the two disorders. For this reason we undertook the current analysis from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project comparing unemployment and disability rates in patients with bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Methods: Patients were interviewed with semi‐structured interviews. We compared three non‐overlapping groups of depressed patients: (i) 181 patients with DSM–IV major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder, (ii) 1068 patients with major depressive disorder without borderline personality disorder, and (iii) 84 patients with bipolar depression without borderline personality disorder. Results: Compared to depressed patients without borderline personality disorder, depressed patients with borderline personality disorder were significantly more likely to have been persistently unemployed. A similar difference was found between patients with bipolar depression and major depressive disorder without borderline personality disorder. No differences were found between patients with bipolar depression and depression with borderline personality disorder. Conclusions: Both bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder were associated with impaired occupational functioning and thus carry a significant public health burden. Efforts to improve detection of borderline personality disorder in depressed patients might be as important as the recognition of bipolar disorder.     

A 15-year prospective follow-up of bipolar affective disorders: comparisons with unipolar nonpsychotic depression

Goldberg JF, Harrow M. A 15‐year prospective follow‐up of bipolar affective disorders: comparisons with unipolar nonpsychotic depression.
Bipolar Disord 2011: 13: 155–163. © 2011 The Authors.
Journal compilation © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives: Outcome studies have previously documented substantial functional disability among individuals with bipolar disorder, although few follow‐up studies have examined the prospective course of illness beyond 10 years’ duration. Methods: A total of 95 patients with mood disorders (46 with bipolar I disorder and 49 with unipolar nonpsychotic depression) were assessed 15 years after index hospitalization. Logistic and linear regression models were used to identify predictors of global functioning, work disability, and social adjustment. Results: At 15‐year follow‐up, good overall functioning was significantly less common among subjects with bipolar disorder (35%) than unipolar depression (73%) (p < 0.001). Work disability was significantly more extensive in bipolar than unipolar disorder subjects (p < 0.001). Logistic regression indicated that good outcome 15 years after index hospitalization was significantly predicted by a unipolar rather than bipolar disorder diagnosis and the absence of a depressive episode in the preceding year. Past‐year depressive, but not past‐year manic, syndromes were associated with poorer global outcome and greater work disability. In addition, subsyndromal depression was significantly associated with poorer global, work, and social outcome among bipolar, but not unipolar disorder subjects. Conclusions: A majority of individuals with bipolar I disorder manifest problems with work and global functioning 15 years after an index hospitalized manic episode Recurrent syndromal and subsyndromal depression disrupts multiple domains of functional outcome more profoundly in bipolar than unipolar mood disorders. The prevalence, and correlates, of impaired long‐term outcome parallel those reported in shorter‐term functional outcome studies of bipolar disorder.     

抑郁症门诊患者中未识别出的双相障碍者的临床特征（英文）

背景双相障碍常未被识别或被误诊为单相抑郁。明确未被识别或被误诊的双相障碍者的临床特征有助于减少错误分类。目的调查门诊抑郁症患者中未被识别的双相障碍者的比例,并分析未被识别的双相障碍者的临床特征。方法使用32项轻躁狂症状清单（Hypomania Checklist-32,HCL-32）、心境障碍问卷（Mood Disorder Questionnaire,MDQ）和简明国际神经精神访谈（Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview,MINI）对目前被诊断为抑郁症的100例门诊患者进行调查。对被重新诊断为双相障碍与仍然被诊断为抑郁症的患者的临床特征进行比较分析。结果共有29例（29%）抑郁症门诊患者被诊断为双相障碍;其中双相Ⅰ型6例,双相Ⅱ型23例。与未更改诊断的抑郁症者相比,被重新诊断为双相障碍者年龄轻、起病早、发病次数多、受教育程度高,多为复发性抑郁且多伴精神病性症状。多因素Logistic回归分析显示年龄（OR=0.55,95%CI=0.34~0.89）和精神病性症状（OR=9.12,95%CI=1.56~53.26）是双相障碍的独立危险因素。结论在门诊抑郁症患者中未被识别的双相障碍比例较高,尤其是双相Ⅱ型。与单相抑郁相比,诊断为抑郁症而为未被识别的双相障碍者年龄轻,更可能伴有精神病性症状。     

Symptoms and treatment of bipolar patients in Sweden

Objective. The objective of the study was to investigate affective symptoms and pharmacological treatment in bipolar I disorder patients, and to test whether self-rated symptoms could predict hospital admissions during a 12-month follow-up period. Methods. A total of 231 outpatients with clinical bipolar I disorder were recruited. The clinical diagnoses were reassessed by a semi-structured interview. Twenty-four patients (10%) was reclassified as bipolar disorder type II or schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type). Medication status was recorded and symptoms were assessed with the self-rating scale AS-18. Patients were prospectively followed for 12 months and hospitalizations during that time were recorded. Results. More than half (60%) rated themselves as normothymic. Mixed affective symptoms were more common than either depressive or manic/hypomanic symptoms. The admission rate during 1 year of follow-up was 13% (95% C.I. 8–17%). Patients which at baseline rated themselves high in either mania or in depression had a significantly increased risk for hospitalization (OR =?3.15; 95% C.I. 1.38–7.19). Conclusions. The findings should encourage clinicians to use patient self ratings in order to identify patients with a high risk for hospitalization for targeted interventions.     

Gender differences in subtypes of late-onset depression and mania

BACKGROUND: It is currently not known whether elderly men and women present with different subtypes of depression and mania/bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of subtypes of a single depressive episode and mania/bipolar disorder according to the ICD-10 for elderly men and women in a nationwide sample of all out- and inpatients in psychiatric settings. METHODS: All patients older than 65 years who received a diagnosis of a single depressive episode and mania/bipolar disorder in the period from 1994 to 2002 at the end of their first outpatient treatment or at their first discharge from psychiatric hospitalization in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register. RESULTS: A total of 9837 patients aged more than 65 years received a diagnosis of a single depressive episode (69.9% were women) and 443 a diagnosis of mania/bipolar disorder (61.6% were women) at the end of their first contact with psychiatric health care. Slightly more women than men received a diagnosis of mild (70.8%) or moderate depression (67.4%) compared to severe depression (65.9%). Men more often presented with a single depressive episode with comorbid substance abuse or comorbid somatic illness. No gender differences were found in the prevalence of depression with or without melancholic or psychotic symptoms. Men more often presented with mania/bipolar disorder with comorbid substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The distributions of the subtypes of a single depressive episode or mania/bipolar disorder are remarkably similar for male and female patients aged over 65 years with first contact with the psychiatric health-care system.     

Does the risk of developing dementia increase with the number of episodes in patients with depressive disorder and in patients with bipolar disorder?

OBJECTIVE: Several findings suggest that some patients with depressive or bipolar disorder may be at increased risk of developing dementia. The present study aimed to investigate whether the risk of developing dementia increases with the number of affective episodes in patients with depressive disorder and in patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: This was a case register study including all hospital admissions with primary affective disorder in Denmark during 1970-99. The effect of the number of prior episodes leading to admission on the rate of readmission with a diagnosis of dementia following the first discharge after 1985 was estimated. A total of 18,726 patients with depressive disorder and 4248 patients with bipolar disorder were included in the study. RESULTS: The rate of a diagnosis of dementia on readmission was significantly related to the number of prior affective episodes leading to admission. On average, the rate of dementia tended to increase 13% with every episode leading to admission for patients with depressive disorder and 6% with every episode leading to admission for patients with bipolar disorder, when adjusted for differences in age and sex. CONCLUSION: On average, the risk of dementia seems to increase with the number of episodes in depressive and bipolar affective disorders.     

Symptoms of depression and anxiety (MHI) following acute medical/surgical hospitalization and post-discharge psychiatric diagnoses (DSM) in 839 geriatric US veterans

OBJECTIVE: We addressed the relatively unexplored use of screening scores measuring symptoms of depression and/or anxiety to aid in identifying patients at increased risk for post-discharge DSM-IV Axis I diagnoses. We were unable to find such studies in the literature. METHOD: Elderly veterans without recent psychiatric diagnoses were screened for depression and anxiety symptoms upon admission to acute medical/surgical units using the Mental Health Inventory (MHI). Following discharge, those who had exceeded cut-off scores and had been randomized to UPBEAT Care (Unified Psychogeriatric Biopsychosocial Evaluation and Treatment, a clinical demonstration project) were evaluated for DSM diagnoses. We report on 839 patients, mostly male (96.3%; mean age 69.6 +/- 6.7 years), comparing three groups, i.e. those meeting screening criteria for symptoms of (i) depression only; (ii) anxiety only; and (iii) both depression and anxiety. RESULTS: Despite absence of recent psychiatric history, 58.6% of the 839 patients received a DSM diagnosis post-discharge (21.8% adjustment; 15.4% anxiety; 7.5% mood; and 14.0% other disorders). Patients meeting screening criteria for both depression and anxiety symptoms received a DSM diagnosis more frequently than those meeting criteria for anxiety symptoms only (61.9% vs 49.0%, p = 0.017), but did not differ significantly from those meeting criteria for depressive symptoms only (61.9% vs 56.8%, p = 0.174). Although exceeding the MHI screening cut-off scores for depression, anxiety, or both helped to identify patients with a post-discharge DSM diagnosis, the actual MHI screening scores failed to do so. CONCLUSION: Screening hospitalized medical/surgical patients for symptoms of depression, anxiety, and particularly for the combination thereof, may help identify those with increased risk of subsequent DSM diagnoses, including adjustment disorder.     

A comparison of unipolar and bipolar depressive illness

In a study of 40 consecutively hospitalized patients with research diagnoses of endogenous depression, the authors found no difference between unipolar and bipolar depressive patients in the risk for affective disorder in first-degree relatives, proportion of EEG or neuropsychological abnormalities, clinical evidence of the depressive syndrome, or response to doctor's choice of treatment. Bipolar patients had an earlier age of onset and displayed more manic symptoms that did unipolar patients. The authors conclude that the two forms of depressive illness are clinically and genetically homogeneous, are without identifying EEG or cognitive differences, and have an equally good response to somatic treatments.