The Alfred pre-hospital fluid formula for major burns

Background

The Alfred pre-hospital fluid isotonic crystalloid resuscitation formula for major burns (body weight (kg) × %TBSA burnt = mls in the first 2 h) was adopted by Ambulance Victoria in 2007 for the early and consistent correction of fluid deficit in major burns patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associated change in pre-hospital fluid administration.

Methods

A retrospective explicit chart review of patient records was conducted of all patients with major burns presenting to The Alfred Emergency & Trauma Centre over a 10 year period. Patient demographics, fluid resuscitation and outcomes in the period before the introduction of the new formula were compared to those in the post-introduction period.

Results

There were 126 patients with major burns (≥20% total body surface area burnt) included in the study. The median fluid volume administration pre-hospital after introduction of The Alfred formula was 0.35 (0.22–0.44) mL/kg/%TBSA burnt, which was significantly higher than 0.14 (0.04–0.26) mL/kg/%TBSA administered in the prior period (p = 0.013). There was no significant change in physiological endpoints associated with the increased volume. At 24 h, the volume of fluid administered in patients when The Alfred formula was used was 4.9 ± 1.6 mL/kg/%TBSA, which was not significantly higher than the volume administered before 2007 of 4.8 ± 2.2 mL/%TBSA/kg (p = 0.802).

Discussion

The Alfred pre-hospital fluid formula has resulted in patients receiving significantly more fluids early, although still below volumes suggested by the Parkland formula. There were no adverse effects of this increased volume detected over the study period. The Alfred pre-hospital fluid formula appears to be safe and more effective in delivering fluid volumes predicted by the current ‘gold standard’.     

Is the Parkland formula still the best method for determining the fluid resuscitation volume in adults for the first 24 hours after injury? — A retrospective analysis of burn patients in Germany

BackgroundR Rapid fluid resuscitation is a crucial therapy during the treatment of patients with extensive burns. In 1968, the Parkland Formula was introduced for the calculation of the estimated volume of the resuscitation fluid. Since then, different methods for the calculation of fluid resuscitation volume have been developed. We aimed to evaluate if the Parkland formula is still the most effective method for fluid resuscitation volume calculation in burn patients.MethodsIn the period between January 2015 and January 2019, data from 569 patients over 16 years old with burns of more than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) and at least 15% TBSA full thickness burns were entered in the German burn registry. The patients were divided into 5 groups (0, +1, ?1, +2, ?2) according to the volume of the resuscitation fluid they received. Group 0 patients received the amount of fluid calculated according to the Parkland formula (n = 83). The 4 other groups received reduced (-1, -2) or increased (+1, +2) fluid volumes in comparison to the value obtained by the Parkland formula.ResultsPatients in Group 0 presented a significantly lower mortality in the first week (4.5%) compared to groups –2 (16.7%) and group +2 (19.5%) (p = 0.021). Furthermore, the mean number of operations in group +2 (5.81) was higher than in group ?2 (3.81). Surviving patients from group +2 presented a longer hospital stay (68.1 days) compared to the other groups. Additionally, the logistic regression analysis showed a higher survival of patients in groups ?2 and ?1 (regression coefficients ?0.11 and ?0.086; Odds Ratio 0.896 and 0.918; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0,411–1.951 and 0.42–2.004).ConclusionIn this retrospective study, register based analysis a restrictive fluid regime was associated with a higher survival compared to the liberal Parkland guided fluid regime.     

Intrathoracic blood volume as an end point in resuscitation of the severely burned: an observational study of 24 patients

BACKGROUND: Treatment of burn shock according to empirical resuscitation formulas is still considered the gold standard, and the burn community does not advocate the use of invasive cardiorespiratory monitoring in general. As a consequence, data dealing with early postburn hemodynamics are sparse, and only few studies have paid attention to the topic of end-point burn shock resuscitation. However, recent studies have suggested that burn survival may be improved when invasive monitoring is used to guide fluid therapy during the shock phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an observational study of 24 patients with severe burns, the transpulmonary double indicator dilution technique was used for semi-invasive hemodynamic monitoring. The clinical utility of the intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) as an end-point variable for fluid resuscitation was evaluated, comparing correlation of filling pressure obtained by a pulmonary artery catheter and intrathoracic blood volume to cardiac index and oxygen delivery. In addition fluid volume predicted by the Parkland burn formula was compared with the actual fluid volume given when ITBV was used as end point for resuscitation. RESULTS: ITBV-guided resuscitation was associated with restoration of preload and peripheral delivery of oxygen within 24 hours in the majority of patients. Augmentation of ITBV was significantly correlated with changes in cardiac index and oxygen transport rate. No such correlation could be demonstrated for the conventional preload parameters such as central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Thus, ITBV seemed in burned, hypovolemic patients a better indicator of the preload component of the cardiac output than the conventional preload parameters obtained with the pulmonary artery catheter. Significantly larger volumes of crystalloids than predicted by the Parkland formula were administered when ITBV was used as end point for resuscitation. The extravascular lung water remained normal during this extraordinary high volume load. CONCLUSION: ITBV may be a reliable preload indicator to guide volume therapy in life-threatening burns, and end-point-fixed resuscitation to this parameter seems to be associated with significantly higher fluid administration than calculated compared with traditional burn formulas. The effects of burn resuscitation to fixed end points on survival and multiple organ failure should be evaluated in future randomly assigned trials.     

Resuscitation, anaesthesia and analgesia of the burned patient

Burns resuscitation has evolved over the past few decades towards more evidence-based management. It has been shown that patients with major burns (i.e. involving more than 30% of the body surface) benefit from invasive monitoring, and physiological variable targeted resuscitation using vasoactive agents for cardiovascular support. The invasive approach results in a reduction of mortality rates. Since the introduction of the Parkland formula in 1968, there has been a trend towards the administration of fluid resuscitation far in excess of the volume predicted with this formula. This has led to an increase in complication rates, with more pulmonary oedema, and the appearance of abdominal compartment syndrome. Hypertonic saline solutions, whether with dextran or not, have shown no advantage over the classic Ringer's lactate solution. The colloid controversy has reached burns resuscitation, with the demonstration that the liberal use of albumin is associated with higher mortality rates. Fresh frozen plasma should only be used for specific coagulation disorders. On the other hand, artificial colloids, particularly gelatine, remain a useful tool in patients with major burns and haemodynamic instability, particularly, and can be given as early as 6 h after injury. Considering the actual evidence, using inotropes and vasopressors to reach supranormal haemodynamic endpoints seems preferable to delivering unrestricted amounts of fluid.     

Increased fluid resuscitation can lead to adverse outcomes in major-burn injured patients, but low mortality is achievable

Background

Excessive fluid resuscitation of large burn injuries has been associated with adverse outcomes. We reviewed our experience in patients with major-burn injury to assess the relationship between fluid, clinical outcome and cause of variance from expected resuscitation volumes as defined by the Parkland formula.

Methods

Eighty patients with new burns ≥15% total body surface area (TBSA) admitted to the intensive care unit within 48 h of injury were included.

Results

Mean fluid volume was 6.0 ± 2.3 mL/kg/% TBSA at 24 h. Bolus fluids for hypotension and oliguria explained 39% of excess variance from Parkland estimates and inaccurate burn size and weight assessment explained 9% of variance. Higher fluid volume was associated with pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–3.4) and extremity compartment syndrome (AOR = 7.9; 95% CI 2.4–26). Colloid use during the first 24 h reduced the risk of extremity compartment syndrome (AOR = 0.06; 95% CI 0.007–0.49) and renal failure (AOR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.014–0.82). In-hospital mortality was low (10%) and not associated with >125% Parkland resuscitation (P = 0.39).

Conclusions

Although fluid resuscitation in excess of the Parkland formula was associated with several adverse events, mortality was low. A multi-centre trial is needed to more specifically define the indications and volumes needed for burns fluid resuscitation and revise traditional formulae emphasising patient outcome. Improved training in burn size assessment is needed.     

Effectiveness of Parkland formula in the estimation of resuscitation fluid volume in adult thermal burns

Purpose: Acute burn resuscitation in initial 24 h remains a challenge to plastic surgeons. Though various formulae for fluid infusion are available but consensus is still lacking, resulting in under resuscitation or over resuscitation. Parkland formula is widely used but recently its adequacy is questioned in studies. This study was conducted to see how closely the actual volume of fluid given in our center matches with that of calculated volume by Parkland formula. Methods: All patients admitted with more than 20% flame burn injury and within 8 h of incident were included in this study. Crystalloid solution for infusion was calculated as per Parkland formula; however, it was titrated according to the urine output. Data on fluid infusion were collected from patient''s inpatient records and analyzed. Results: The study included a total of 90 patients, about 86.7% (n ¼ 78) of the patients received fluid less than the calculated Parkland formula. Rate of fluid administered over 24 h in our study was 3.149 mL/kg/h. Mean hourly urine output was found to be 0.993 mL/kg/h. The mean difference between fluid administered and fluid calculated by Parkland formula was 3431.825 mL which was significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study showed a significant difference in the fluid infused based on urine output and the fluid calculated by Parkland formula. This probably is because fluid infused based on end point of resuscitation was more physiological than fluid calculated based on formulae.     

Weight-based vs body surface area-based fluid resuscitation predictions in pediatric burn patients

Treatment for pediatric burns includes fluid resuscitation with formulas estimating fluid requirements based on weight and/or body surface area (BSA) with percent total body surface area burn (%TBSA burn). This study evaluates the risk of complications using weight-based resuscitation in children following burn injuries and compares fluid estimates with those that incorporate BSA. A retrospective review was conducted on 110 children admitted to an ABA-verified urban pediatric burn center over 12 years. Patients had ≥ 15% TBSA burn and were resuscitated with the weight-based Parkland formula. BSA-based Galveston and BSA-incorporated Cincinnati formula predictions were calculated. Complications were collected throughout hospital stay. Patients were classified into weight groups based on percentile. This study included 11 underweight, 60 normal weight, 18 overweight, and 21 obese children. Total fluid administered was higher as percentile increased; however, overweight children received more fluid than the obese (p = 0.023). The Galveston formula underpredicted fluid given over the first 24 h post-injury (p = 0.042); the Parkland and Cincinnati formula predictions did not significantly differ from fluids given. Further research is needed to determine the value of weight-based vs BSA-based or incorporated formulas in reducing risk of complications.     

Burn resuscitation on the African continent

A survey of members of the International Society of Burn Injuries (ISBI) and the American Burn Association (ABA) indicated that although there was difference in burn resuscitation protocols, they all fulfilled their functions. This study presents the findings of the same survey replicated in Africa, the only continent not included in the original survey.One hundred and eight responses were received. The mean annual number of admissions per unit was ninety-eight. Fluid resuscitation was usually initiated with total body surface area burns of either more than ten or more than fifteen percent. Twenty-six respondents made use of enteral resuscitation.The preferred resuscitation formula was the Parkland formula, and Ringer's Lactate was the favoured intravenous fluid. Despite satisfaction with the formula, many respondents believed that patients received volumes that differed from that predicted. Urine output was the principle guide to adequate resuscitation, with only twenty-one using the evolving clinical picture and thirty using invasive monitoring methods. Only fifty-one respondents replied to the question relating to the method of adjusting resuscitation. While colloids are not available in many parts of the African continent on account of cost, one might infer than African burn surgeons make better use of enteral resuscitation.     

Modern trends in fluid therapy for burns

The majority of burn centres use the crystalloid-based Parkland formula to guide fluid therapy, but patients actually receive far more fluid than the formula predicts. Resuscitation with large volumes of crystalloid has numerous adverse consequences, including worsening of burn oedema, conversion of superficial into deep burns, and compartment syndromes. Resuscitation fluids influence the inflammatory response to burns in different ways and it may be possible, therefore to affect this response using the appropriate fluid, at the appropriate time. Starches are effective volume expanders and early use of newer formulations may limit resuscitation requirements and burn oedema by reducing inflammation and capillary leak. Advanced endpoint monitoring may guide clinicians in when to ‘turn off’ aggressive fluid therapy and therefore avoid the problems of over-resuscitation.     

Überinfusion von Verbrennungsopfern: häufig und schädlich

Background

Major burns are characterized by an initial capillary leak, which requires fluid resuscitation for hemodynamic stabilization. While under resuscitation was the major cause of death until the 1980s, over resuscitation has become an important source of complications, including abdominal compartment syndrome, escharosis, impaired gas exchange with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay. Fluid over infusion started in the 1990s with an increasing proportion of the fluid delivered within the first 24 h being well above the 4 ml/kg/% burn surface area (BSA) according to the Parkland formula. The first alerts were published in the form of case reports of increased mortality due to abdominal compartment syndrome and respiratory failure.

Objective

This paper analyses the causes of this fluid over infusion and the ways to prevent it, which include rationing prehospital fluid delivery, avoiding early administration of colloids and prevention by permissive hypovolemia.     

Effects of obesity on burn resuscitation

The effects of obesity on resuscitation after severe burn are not well understood. Formulas to calculate 24-h resuscitation volumes incorporate body weight, which in obese patients often leads to excessive fluid administration and potential complications such as pulmonary edema, extremity or abdominal compartment syndrome, and longer mechanical ventilation. We evaluated the impact of obesity on 24-h fluid resuscitation after severe burn using a cohort of 145 adults admitted to the burn ICU from January 2014 to March 2017 with >20% total body surface area burns. Patients were divided into four groups based on body mass index: normal weight (index of <25), overweight (25–29.9), obese (30–39.9), and morbidly obese (>40). Median total body surface area burn was 39.4% (interquartile range: 23.5%–49.5%). Patients were 74.5% male and demographics and injury characteristics were similar across groups. Resuscitation volumes exceeded the predicted Parkland formula volume in the normal and overweight groups but were less than predicted in the obese and morbidly obese categories (p < 0.001). No difference was found in 24-h urine output between groups (p = 0.08). Increasing body mass index was not associated with increased use of renal replacement therapy. Only total body surface area burned, and age were independent predictors of hospital mortality (p < 0.001). We conclude that using body weight to calculate resuscitation in obese patients results in a predicted fluid volume that is higher than the volume actually given, which can lead to over-resuscitation if rates are not titrated regularly to address fluid responsiveness.     

Controversies in fluid resuscitation for burn management: literature review and our experience

The purpose of this review is to summarise the commonly used formulae for fluid resuscitation in major burns and to discuss the controversy surrounding the use of protein-based colloids as a component of these types of formulae. Fluid resuscitation in major burns is one of the most critical steps in managing this type of injury. In practice, a wide variety of formulae for fluid resuscitation has been suggested. Some propose only the use of crystalloids, while others combine the colloids together with crystalloids. A review was performed of the literature addressing fluid resuscitation formulae and our experience using our formula is presented. At the authors' burn centre a unique formula is in use, which combines plasma and crystalloids. Our experience using this specific formula extends over a period of 15 years and 356 patients with major burns have been resuscitated using this protocol. At our centre, 27 deaths were recorded, 19 of which had third degree burns of more than 80% total body surface area (TBSA). The protein-based colloids are included in most of the formulae and the beneficial effect is considered to be higher than the potential side effects. We are in favour of administering colloids during the resuscitation period for major burns, starting in the early period after injury.     

Crystalloids, colloids and kids: a review of paediatric burns in intensive care

This is a retrospective review of all burns patients admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) over a 7 year period. Resuscitation fluid therapy and clinical course are presented. Ninety-eight new burns victims were admitted with a mortality rate of 10.2%, all in burns of greater than 25% body surface area (BSA). The incidence of ARDS was 20%, with an 18% mortality rate. Of 85 patients with burns greater than 5% BSA, 33 received the hospital-recommended colloid-based resuscitation formula, 46 received a combination of crystalloids and colloids and in 6 patients the resuscitation regimen was not able to be determined. The aetiology, age distribution, sex ratio, severity of burns and length of stay in hospital did not alter significantly over the study period. The number of burns admissions to PICU increased, as did their duration of intubation and ICU stay. The hospital-recommended resuscitation formula consistently underestimated the fluid volume required for adequate resuscitation. No statistically significant difference in adverse effects was found between the resuscitation groups. This study is unable to recommend a definitive approach to the fluid resuscitation of burns shock in paediatrics and the best approach is one of meticulous fluid resuscitation titrated on clinical effect.     

A burn mass casualty event due to boiler room explosion on a cruise ship: preparedness and outcomes

The purpose of this study was to review our experience with a mass casualty incident resulting from a boiler room steam explosion aboard a cruise ship. Experience with major, moderate, and minor burns, steam inhalation, mass casualty response systems, and psychological sequelae will be discussed. Fifteen cruise ship employees were brought to the burn center after a boiler room explosion on a cruise ship. Eleven were triaged to the trauma resuscitation area and four to the surgical emergency room. Seven patients were intubated for respiratory distress or airway protection. Six patients had >80 per cent burns with steam inhalation, and all of these died. One of the 6 patients had 99 per cent burns with steam inhalation and died after withdrawal of support within the first several hours. All patients with major burns required escharotomy on arrival to trauma resuscitation. One patient died in the operating room, despite decompression by laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome and pericardiotomy via thoracotomy for cardiac tamponade. Four patients required crystalloid, 20,000 mls/m2-27,000 ml/m2 body surface area (BSA) in the first 48 hours to maintain blood pressure and urine output. Three of these four patients subsequently developed abdominal compartment syndrome and died in the first few days. The fourth patient of this group died after 26 days due to sepsis. Five patients had 13-20 per cent bums and four patients had less than 10 per cent burns. Two of the patients with 20 per cent burns developed edema of the vocal cords with mild hoarseness. They improved and recovered without intubation. The facility was prepared for the mass casualty event; having just completed a mass casualty drill several days earlier. Twenty-six beds were made available in 50 minutes for anticipated casualties. Fifteen physicians reported immediately to the trauma resuscitation area to assist in initial stabilization. The event occurred at shift change; thus, adequate support personnel were instantaneously to hand. Our mass casualty preparation proved useful in managing this event. Most of the patients who survived showed signs of post-traumatic stress syndrome, which was diagnosed and treated by the burn center psychology team. Despite our efforts at treating large burns (>80%) with steam inhalation, mortality was 100 per cent. Fluid requirements far exceeded those predicted by the Parkland (Baxter) formula. Abdominal compartment syndrome proved to be a significant complication of this fluid resuscitation. A coordinated effort by the facility and preparation for mass casualty events are needed to respond to such events.     

Resuscitation of thermal injuries in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

The purpose of this study was to examine the consistency of burns resuscitation practice throughout UK and Ireland. Twenty-six Burns Units were identified via the National Burn Bed Bureau and surveyed via a postal questionnaire. Twenty-three units returned a completed questionnaire, covering all of the units treating children and 17 out of 20 units that treat adults. Nearly all of the Burns Units commence fluid resuscitation at 10% total body surface area of burn in children and 15% total body surface area of burn in adults. The estimated resuscitation volume is calculated using the Parkland or the Muir and Barclay formula in 76% and 11% of units, respectively. The most commonly used resuscitation fluid is Hartmann's solution. No unit uses blood as a first line fluid. Resuscitation is discontinued after 24h in 35% of units and after 36 h in 30% of units. Approximately half of the units do not routinely change the type of intravenous fluid administered after the initial period of resuscitation. This survey illustrates that resuscitation of thermally injured patients in UK and Ireland Burns Units is fairly consistent with a shift towards crystalloid resuscitation.     

High-dose vitamin C therapy for extensive deep dermal burns.

We studied the haemodynamic effects of antioxidant therapy with high-dose vitamin C administration (170 mg/kg/24 h) in guinea-pigs with 70 per cent body surface area deep dermal burns. The animals were divided into three groups of six animals each. Group 1 was resuscitated with Ringer's lactate solution according to the Parkland formula; group 2 with 25 per cent of the Parkland formula with vitamin C; and group 3 with 25 per cent of the Parkland formula without vitamin C. There were no significant differences in heart rates or in blood pressures between the groups throughout the 24-h study period. Group 3 showed significantly higher haematocrit values at 3 h postburn and thereafter as compared with those of group 2. The cardiac output values of group 2 were significantly higher than those of group 3, but equivalent to those of group 1. The water content of the burned skin in group 2 was significantly lower than that in the other groups, indicating that increased postburn capillary permeability was minimized by the administration of vitamin C. With adjuvant high-dose vitamin C administration, we were able to reduce the 24-h resuscitation fluid volume from 4 ml/kg/per cent burn to 1 ml/kg/per cent burn, while maintaining adequate cardiac output.     

Effect of inhalation injury on fluid resuscitation requirements after thermal injury

The presence of inhalation injury has been reported to increase fluid requirements for resuscitation from burn shock after thermal injury. To evaluate the effect of inhalation injury on the magnitude of burn-induced shock, the characteristics of resuscitation of 171 patients with burns covering at least 25 percent of the total body surface area were reviewed. When inhalation injury was suspected, confirmation by xenon-133 scanning, bronchoscopy, or both was obtained. Initial fluid resuscitation was calculated according to the Parkland formula, and titration was initiated to maintain a urine output of 30 to 50 ml/hour. Fifty-one patients had inhalation injuries. Patients with inhalation injuries had a mean fluid requirement of 5.76 ml/kg per percentage of total body surface area burned and a mean sodium requirement of 0.94 mEq/kg per percentage of total body surface area burned to achieve successful resuscitation, compared with a fluid requirement of 3.98 ml/kg per percentage of total body surface area burned and a sodium requirement of 0.68 mEq/kg per percentage of total body surface area burned for the group without inhalation injury (p less than 0.05). These data confirm and quantitate that inhalation injury accompanying thermal trauma increases the magnitude of total body injury and requires increased volumes of fluid and sodium to achieve resuscitation from early burn shock.     

An allometric model to estimate fluid requirements in children following burn injury

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of an allometric 3/4 Power Model combined with the Galveston Formula (Galveston‐3/4 PM Formula) to predict fluid resuscitation requirements in children suffering burn injuries in comparison with the frequently used Parkland Formula and Galveston Formula using the Du Bois formula for surface area estimation (Galveston–DB Formula). Aim: To demonstrate that the Galveston‐3/4 PM Formula is clinically equivalent to the Galveston–DB Formula for the estimation of fluid requirements in pediatric burn injury cases. Background: Fluid resuscitation requirements differ in children suffering burn injuries when compared to adults. The Parkland Formula works well for normal weight adults but underestimates fluid requirements when indiscriminately applied to pediatric burn patients. The Galveston–DB Formula accounts for the change in body composition with age by using a body surface area (BSA) model but requires the measurement of height. The allometric model, using an exponent of 3/4, accounts for the dependence of a physiological variable on body mass without requiring height measurement and can be applied to estimate fluid requirements after burn injury in children. Methods: Comparisons were performed between the hourly calculated fluid requirements for the first 8 h following 20%, 40%, and 60% BSA burns using the Parkland Formula, the Galveston–DB Formula and Galveston‐3/4 PM Formula for children 2–23 kg. Results: In children less than 23 kg, the fluid requirements predicted by the Galveston‐3/4 PM Formula are well correlated with those predicted by the Galveston–DB Formula (R2 = 0.997, P < 0.0001) and are much better than of the predictions made with the Parkland Formula, especially for children <10 kg. Conclusions: For the purposes of clinical estimation of fluid requirements, the Galveston‐3/4 PM Formula is indistinguishable from the Galveston–DB Formula in children 23 kg or less.     

Graphic AIDS for calculation of fluid resuscitation requirements in pediatric burns

ABSTRACT: The Parkland formula is currently the most widely used protocol to guide fluid resuscitation of acute burns and has been adapted for pediatric use. We describe 3 novel graphic devices (a nomogram, slide rule, and disc calculator) based on this formula, which have significant advantages over existing graphic and electronic devices. The robust low-cost graphic devices would be particularly suited to developing countries and difficult locations, but could be used as the primary means of calculation in any environment. If a computer or calculator is used as the primary means of calculation, the graphic devices provide a simple and rapid means of checking and preventing errors that may arise because of inadvertent miskeying of data or incorrect application of the pediatric Parkland formula.     

A simplified fluid resuscitation formula for burns in mass casualty scenarios: Analysis of the consensus recommendation from the WHO Emergency Medical Teams Technical Working Group on Burns

BackgroundBurn fluid resuscitation guidelines have not specifically addressed mass casualty with resource limited situations, except for oral rehydration for burns below 40% total body surface area (TBSA). The World Health Organization Technical Working Group on Burns (TWGB) recommends an initial fluid rate of 100 mL/kg/24 h, either orally or intravenously, beyond 20% TBSA burned. We aimed to compare this formula with current guidelines.MethodsThe TWGB formula was numerically compared with 2–4 mL/kg/%TBSA for adults and the Galveston formula for children.ResultsIn adults, the TWGB formula estimated fluid volumes within the range of current guidelines for burns between 25 and 50% TBSA, and a maximal 20 mL/kg/24 h difference in the 20–25% and the 50–60% TBSA ranges. In children, estimated resuscitation volumes between 20 and 60% TBSA approximated estimations by the Galveston formula, but only partially compensated for maintenance fluids. Beyond 60% TBSA, the TWGB formula underestimated fluid to be given in all age groups.ConclusionThe TWGB formula for mass burn casualties may enable appropriate fluid resuscitation for most salvageable burned patients in disasters. This simple formula is easy to implement. It should simplify patient management including transfers, reduce the risk of early complications, and thereby optimize disaster response, provided that tailored resuscitation is given whenever specialized care becomes available.