Inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists in asthma: help or hindrance?

Conventional low doses of inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists produce effective bronchodilation without systemic effects. Higher doses of inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists may produce substantial improvements in bronchodilator response, which may be helpful to patients with more severe airway obstruction. At higher than recommended doses, in asthmatic patients, fenoterol appears to cause greater dose-related systemic beta 2-responses compared with salbutamol or terbutaline, although there is no evidence to suggest that fenoterol is any less beta 2-selective in vivo. Furthermore, tolerance develops to systemic but not to bronchodilator effects during chronic treatment with inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists. The link between asthma mortality and systemic adverse effects of inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists at present remains unproven. A critical reappraisal of the regular use of inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists including long-acting drugs is now indicated in the light of their possible adverse effects on disease control. Patients requiring regular use of inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists should be given additional anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids.     

Asthma medications and their potential adverse effects in the elderly: recommendations for prescribing.

The incidence of drug-induced adverse effects is likely to increase as a result of advanced age and exposure of elderly patients to polypharmacy. Therefore, pharmacological therapy of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the elderly patient can be potentially hazardous. beta(2)-agonists, administered as therapy for asthma and COPD, have recognised systemic sequelae, such as hypokalaemia and chronotropic effects, which may be life-threatening in susceptible patients. Adverse effects such as hypokalaemia can be aggravated by concomitant treatment with other drugs promoting potassium loss including diuretics, corticosteroids and theophyllines. In addition, relatively minor adverse events associated with the administration of beta(2)-agonists, such as tremor and blood pressure changes, may be of significance to the elderly patient leading to impairment in the quality of life. However, long-term treatment with beta(2)-agonists may reduce the incidence of drug-induced adverse effects as a result of beta-receptor subsensitivity. Oral and inhaled corticosteroids have been used for the treatment of acute asthma and COPD in the elderly patient. Long-term treatment with oral corticosteroids can result in serious systemic adverse effects such as suppressed adrenal function, bone loss, skin thinning and cataract formation. In contrast to beta(2)-agonists, oral corticosteroids can upregulate beta(2)-adrenoceptors and thereby potentiate the systemic sequelae of beta(2)-agonists. Hence, oral corticosteroids should be administered with caution for as short a duration as possible. Inhaled corticosteroids appear to be relatively well tolerated when administered at doses below approximately 1000 microg. However, larger doses of inhaled corticosteroids may affect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and bone turnover. In the case of inhaled corticosteroids, spacer devices, often used in older patients who cannot operate metered dose inhalers, can potentiate the systemic sequelae of both corticosteroids and beta(2)-agonists. The use of theophyllines in the treatment of COPD or chronic asthma is controversial. Theophyllines have a wide adverse effect profile and are prone to drug-drug interactions. The adverse effects may be mild or life threatening and include nausea and vomiting or sinus and supraventricular tachycardias. Therefore, theophyllines should be prescribed with extreme caution to elderly patients with asthma or COPD. In contrast, inhaled anticholinergic drugs such as ipratropium bromide and oxitropium bromide are generally safe in elderly patients and have useful bronchodilator function. Commonly reported adverse effects are an unpleasant taste and dryness of the mouth. When used as first-line therapy, anticholinergic drugs may optimise the bronchodilator effects of low-dose inhaled beta(2)-agonists in patients with chronic airflow obstruction, and hence obviate the need for higher doses.     

A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease.

The two inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, have been studied extensively since their introduction in the early 1990s. In this review we consider the evidence for their efficacy and safety in adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), by reviewing long-term prospective studies in which these drugs have been compared with placebo or an alternative bronchodilator. We have also assessed safety, including data from postmarketing surveillance studies and case-control studies using large databases. In patients with asthma, salmeterol and formoterol increase lung function, reduce asthmatic symptoms and improve quality of life when compared with placebo. Both drugs protect against exercise-induced asthma, although some tolerance develops with regular use. Tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of formoterol has also been seen, although this is small and most of the beneficial effects are maintained long-term. Both drugs have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations but only in studies in which most patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid. Adding a long-acting beta2-agonist provided better control than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid in several studies. Long-acting beta2-agonists also provide better asthma control than use of regular short-acting beta2-agonists and theophylline. Their relative efficacy compared with leukotriene antagonists is uncertain as yet. Formoterol appears to be at least as safe and effective as a short-acting beta2-agonist when used on an 'as required' basis. In patients with COPD, both salmeterol and formoterol offer improved lung function and reduced COPD symptoms compared with placebo, and quality of life has been improved in some studies. Some tolerance to the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol was seen in one study. Most studies have not found a significant reduction in exacerbations in COPD. Both drugs have provided greater benefit than ipratropium bromide or theophylline; there are limited data on tiotropium bromide. The long-acting beta2-agonists cause predictable adverse effects including headache, tremor, palpitations, muscle cramps and a fall in serum potassium concentration. Salmeterol can also cause paradoxical bronchospasm. There is some evidence that serious adverse events including dysrhythmias and life-threatening asthma episodes can occur; however, the incidence of such events is very low but may be increased in patients not taking an inhaled corticosteroid. Salmeterol 50 microg twice daily and formoterol 12 microg twice daily are effective and safe in treating patients with asthma and COPD. Higher doses cause more adverse effects, although serious adverse events are rare.     

Part IV: Genetic variations in beta2-adrenergic receptors: long-acting and short-acting beta2-agonists and therapeutic response

Inhaled beta2-agonists are the most commonly used treatment for asthma. It has been hypothesized that patients who exhibit functional polymorphic variants of the beta2-adrenergic receptor may be more likely to experience adverse outcomes with the regular use of beta2-agonists, particularly the short-acting beta2-agonist albuterol. This hypothesis has been confirmed in retrospective studies and in a prospective clinical trial. Results from these studies demonstrate that patients with the Arg/Arg phenotype at the 16th amino acid position of the beta2-adrenergic receptor may experience worsening asthma outcomes after regular beta2-agonist use. Data regarding the impact of polymorphic variants of the beta2-adrenergic receptor on response to long-acting beta2-agonists are conflicting. However, recent data indicate that use of long-acting beta2-agonists may be associated with an increased risk of life-threatening asthma or asthma-related deaths, which might be increased among African-Americans and patients who do not use inhaled corticosteroids. Until more data are available, short-acting beta-agonists should only be used on an as-needed basis and to prevent exercise-induced asthma symptoms, and long-acting beta-agonists should only be used as an adjunct to controller therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Any patient with asthma who requires adjunctive use of a long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to an inhaled corticosteroid should be carefully monitored for possible adverse asthma outcomes.     

Pharmacological approach to evaluate aerosol pulmonary deposition.

Drug delivery to the lung in vivo may be assessed using pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic techniques. The choice of method depends on drug class specificities. Pharmacokinetic determination of deposition to the lung for drugs without hepatic first-pass effect, such as short acting beta2-agonists, has to be done shortly after inhalation to minimize the effect of gastrointestinal absorption. For medication undergoing important hepatic first-pass metabolisation, such as inhaled corticosteroid, plasma concentration indirectly reflects bronchial deposition. The pharmacodynamic profile should be assessed through clinical effects and adverse events induced by inhaled drugs. Dose ranking of lung deposition for bronchodilators requires patient selection with sufficient bronchial obstruction to maintain room for improvement after the first dose. To assess dose effect relationship between inhaled corticosteroid, the Finney parallel line bioassay is the reference method with a study period of at least 6 weeks. Analysis of side effects with high doses of beta2-agonists or inhaled corticosteroids may also be used to compare lung deposition. Finally, pharmacological evaluation of lung deposition provides complementary information to scintigraphic studies, based on their clinical relevance.     

The risk/benefit of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Although inhaled corticosteroids have a well defined role in asthma therapy, their use remains controversial in nonasthmatic, smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Some studies have shown an effect of inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation in COPD, but the clinical relevance of these results is unknown. Data from five long-term, large studies, provide evidence that prolonged treatment with inhaled corticosteroids does not modify the rate of decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in patients with COPD and no reversibility to short-acting beta(2)-agonists. FEV1 was slightly improved over the first six months of treatment and lower reactivity in response to methacholine challenge has been observed. Improvement of respiratory symptoms and health status were also reported. A reduction of exacerbations rate was observed in two studies. No survival benefit was demonstrated. Two recent reports suggest that long term use of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients improves quality-adjusted life expectancy and is cost-effective. Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists have proven benefit in four long term large studies compared to placebo for FEV1, exacerbation rate, symptoms and health status. However, only two studies found that combination therapy was more effective than long-acting beta(2)-agonists alone for symptoms and health status improvement. The long term safety of inhaled corticosteroids is not known in COPD patients but topical adverse effects, and systemic effects such as a decrease of bone density of lumbar spine and femur and cutaneous adverse effects, have been reported after three years of treatment. However, three recent observational studies found a slight increase in the risk of fractures (hip, upper extremities and vertebral) in association with high doses of inhaled corticotherapy.     

Anti-inflammatory activities of beta2-agonists

Beta2-adrenergic agonists (beta2-agonists) play a pivotal role in the acute and chronic management of asthma. Their major action on the airways is the relaxation of smooth muscle cells. In addition to their bronchodilator properties, beta2-agonists may have other effects through their activation of beta2-receptors expressed on resident airway cells such as epithelial cells and mast cells and circulating inflammatory cells such as eosinophils and neutrophils. These non-bronchodilator activities of beta2-agonists may enhance their efficacy in the management of asthma. In pre-clinical studies, the anti-inflammatory effects of beta2-agonists are demonstrated through their stabilizing effect on mast cells and their inhibition of mediator release from eosinophils, macrophages T-lymphocytes, and neutrophils. In addition, beta2-agonists may inhibit plasma exudation in the airway, the release of neuropeptides from sensory nerves, and mediator release from epithelial cells. These in vitro observations are not as clearly demonstrated in clinical trials, which may be explained by the rapid desensitization of beta2-adrenergic receptors on airway inflammatory cells. The regular use of short-acting beta2-agonists alone has been shown to have deleterious effects on asthma control. Therefore, short-acting agents should only be used when needed for rescue of acute symptoms. Monotherapy with long-acting beta2-agonists has also been associated with poor asthma control. However, when given concomitantly with inhaled corticosteroids, beta2-agonists may potentiate the anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids, improve asthma control and prevent exacerbations.     

symbol: see text] Seretide and [symbol: see text] Symbicort in asthma management

Maintenance treatment for mild asthma frequently comprises both a regular inhaled corticosteroid and an 'as required' inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonist. Where such treatment fails, additional regular treatment with an inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonist is increasingly recommended. In the UK, combination inhalers containing salmeterol + fluticasone ([symbol: see text] Seretide--Allen & Hanburys) or formoterol + budesonide ([symbol: see text] Symbicort--AstraZeneca) are licensed for use either in "patients not adequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and 'as needed' inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonists" or in "patients already adequately controlled on both inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta 2-agonists". Here we review the efficacy of Seretide and Symbicort and discuss their place in asthma management.     

Combination therapy with inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids: a paradigm shift in asthma management

Long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids are classes of drugs with different mechanisms of action that are commonly used to provide effective long-term control of persistent asthma. Scientific and clinical data support the complementary mechanisms of action of the inhaled corticosteroids and the long-acting beta2-agonists in achieving a superior level of asthma control. In addition, evidence supports significant reductions in exacerbations and effective control of airway inflammation with an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta2-agonist versus higher dosages of inhaled corticosteroids or combinations of other therapeutic agents with an inhaled corticosteroid. Finally, there are distinct economic advantages to combining an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta2-agonist in the treatment of asthma relative to other treatment regimens.     

Inhaled corticosteroids, bone mineral density and fracture in older people

The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma has been firmly established in a variety of settings. The majority of asthma management plans now recommend the use of inhaled corticosteroids at an early stage. This means that most patients with asthma will be prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid at some point in time and many patients with asthma will use these drugs for several years.Inhaled corticosteroids are also used in the treatment of other conditions, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Since inhaled corticosteroids are absorbed into the systemic circulation, they can have systemic adverse effects, such as suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and increasing the risk of bruising. However, perhaps the greatest concern for patients is whether the regular use of inhaled corticosteroids has an adverse impact on the bone mineral density and increases the risk of fracture. There is now accumulating evidence from epidemiological studies that the use of inhaled corticosteroids is inversely related to bone mineral density in a dose-dependent fashion. However, data from two clinical trials of moderately high doses of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD have produced conflicting results and while the larger study of triamcinolone found a significant impact of this drug on bone mineral density, a smaller study of budesonide found no effect.Epidemiological research into the relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and fracture is at an early stage. To date, only three studies in this area have been reported, all of which have used different approaches to try to minimise the impact of bias and confounding. There is a lack of consistency between the final estimates of the impact of inhaled corticosteroids on fracture risk. However, taken together these data suggest that the short to medium term use of inhaled corticosteroids is associated with a small adverse effect on bone. Doctors and patients need to be aware of this risk and balance it against the known beneficial effects of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Tolerance with beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists: time for reappraisal.

1. In spite of the widespread use of beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists in the treatment of asthma controversy continues regarding their possible role in increasing asthma mortality and morbidity. There is however no evidence available to suggest that tolerance to the bronchodilator or anti-bronchoconstrictor effects of these drugs is responsible for the deleterious effects reported with the regular use of bronchodilators. 2. There is no conclusive evidence to suggest that tolerance develops to the bronchodilator effects of short-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists. Tolerance does however appear to develop to the anti-bronchoconstrictor effects of these drugs. 3. With regard to the long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists, there is evidence to suggest that tolerance develops both to their anti-bronchoconstrictor, and bronchodilator effects. Tolerance was however demonstrated in the presence of improved symptom control, therefore the clinical relevance of this phenomenon is uncertain. 4. Systemic corticosteroids can modulate lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptor function both preventing, and reversing tolerance. The situation regarding the effects of systemic or inhaled corticosteroids on modulating bronchodilator responses in asthmatics is less clear. There is some evidence to suggest that inhaled corticosteroids are unable to prevent bronchodilator or systemic tolerance to long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists. 5. On the basis of the current evidence, the British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of asthma appear appropriate with regard to their recommendations for the use of long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists.     

The risk/benefit of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Although inhaled corticosteroids have a well defined role in asthma therapy, their use remains controversial in nonasthmatic, smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Some studies have shown an effect of inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation in COPD, but the clinical relevance of these results is unknown. Data from five long-term, large studies, provide evidence that prolonged treatment with inhaled corticosteroids does not modify the rate of decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in patients with COPD and no reversibility to short-acting β₂-agonists. FEV1 was slightly improved over the first six months of treatment and lower reactivity in response to methacholine challenge has been observed. Improvement of respiratory symptoms and health status were also reported. A reduction of exacerbations rate was observed in two studies. No survival benefit was demonstrated. Two recent reports suggest that long term use of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients improves quality-adjusted life expectancy and is cost-effective. Combination therapy with inhaled corticos-teroids and long-acting β₂-agonists have proven benefit in four long term large studies compared to placebo for FEV1, exacerbation rate, symptoms and health status. However, only two studies found that combination therapy was more effective than long-acting β₂-agonists alone for symptoms and health status improvement. The long term safety of inhaled corticosteroids is not known in COPD patients but topical adverse effects, and systemic effects such as a decrease of bone density of lumbar spine and femur and cutaneous adverse effects, have been reported after three years of treatment. However, three recent observational studies found a slight increase in the risk of fractures (hip, upper extremities and vertebral) in association with high doses of inhaled corticotherapy.     

Long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists: a smart choice for asthma?

An endogenous defect in beta(2)-adrenoceptors that results in impaired relaxation of airway smooth muscle was originally proposed as a putative underlying cause of the asthmatic condition. Short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists such as salbutamol are still recommended for relieving acute episodes of bronchial smooth muscle spasm. Twice-daily long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) such as salmeterol are advocated for use as add-on bronchodilator therapies to inhaled corticosteroids such as beclomethasone, which are used as first-line anti-inflammatory therapy. There is recent evidence of increased asthma exacerbations and associated deaths in subjects taking salmeterol compared with those taking placebo. My opinion is that, in certain situations, the use of LABAs could have adverse effects on asthma control because of the particular pharmacological properties of this class of drug. In this article, I examine the possible pharmacological mechanisms and use of LABAs in certain situations, which are relevant to the benefits and risks of these drugs in asthma.     

Improving drug therapy for patients with asthma-part 2: Use of antiasthma medications

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of antiasthma drugs among the study patients and to evaluate whether therapeutic outcomes monitoring (TOM) is associated with improved quality of drug therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, multicenter study. Consumption of antiasthma medications was measured as the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) purchased. Data were collected from the pharmacies' computer systems for a period beginning 6 months before the start of the study (period 1) and during its first and second half-years (periods 2 and 3). Treatment changes for TOM patients were classified on the basis of drug regimens at periods 1 and 3. SETTING: Community pharmacies in Denmark (16 intervention, 15 control). PATIENTS: Five hundred patients with asthma aged 16 to 60 years who were being treated in primary health care; this study used data from 350 patients from this sample. INTERVENTION: TOM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the use of individual drugs and changes in therapeutic patterns--distribution of purchased drugs; proportion of corticosteroid users; frequency of drug regimens used; treatment changes for TOM patients. RESULTS: TOM patients' consumption of beta2-agonists decreased by 12% overall from period 1 through period 3, while control patients' consumption of these medications decreased by only 1%. TOM patients' use of inhaled corticosteroids increased by more than 50% compared with 9% among controls. In both groups, about one-half of all purchased DDDs were for inhaled beta2-agonists. The proportion of inhaled corticosteroids increased from 27% to 42% of total DDDs for the TOM group and remained constant for controls. Of patients using beta2-agonists, 68% also used inhaled steroids initially in both the TOM and control groups. The proportion of inhaled steroid users in the TOM group increased to 84%, and to 70% among controls. The most common regimen was inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists and corticosteroids in combination, and the second most common regimen was monotherapy with short-acting beta2-agonists. With time, the regimens changed more toward consensus guidelines among TOM patients. Changes in drug therapy totaled 451, averaging 2.4 changes per TOM patient. The largest number of changes (49%) involved inhaled corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Changes in medication use among TOM patients were toward improved asthma treatment. Our results show that community pharmacists, physicians, and patients, working together, can improve prescribing, solve drug therapy problems, and improve outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.     

Benefit-risk assessment of long-acting beta2-agonists in asthma.

The use of a regular long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists; LABA) is now established in asthma guidelines as the preferred option for second-line controller therapy in addition to inhaled corticosteroids. This has been driven by data showing beneficial effects of LABAs on exacerbation rates, in turn suggesting a putative corticosteroid-sparing effect. As LABAs are devoid of any clinically meaningful anti-inflammatory activity in vivo, their effects on exacerbations are presumably due to a diurnal stabilising effect on airway smooth muscle. LABAs have marked effects on symptoms and lung function, and this may make it difficult to assess anti-inflammatory control with inhaled corticosteroids when used in a combination inhaler such as fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol. The use of fixed-dose combination inhalers is in many respects counter-intuitive to conventional teaching regarding flexible dosage titration with inhaled corticosteroids. It would therefore seem prudent first to gain optimal control of inflammation with inhaled corticosteroids before considering adding a LABA. Increasing the dosage of inhaled corticosteroids will have a relatively greater effect on exacerbations than on symptoms and lung function, whereas the converse applies when adding a LABA. Another option is to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist, which confers additional anti-inflammatory activity and is as effective on exacerbations as adding a LABA. Despite in vitro and ex vivo data showing a ligand-independent effect of LABAs on glucocorticoid receptor activation, clinical data do not indicate any relevant synergy between LABAs and inhaled corticosteroids when used together in the same inhaler. In particular, there is no evidence of potentiation by LABAs of the in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of inhaled corticosteroids that would suggest any genuine corticosteroid-sparing activity. Nonetheless, the data support the additive effects of inhaled corticosteroids and LABAs when used together due to their separate effects on inflammation and smooth muscle, respectively.Tolerance with LABAs is a predictable pharmacological phenomenon that occurs despite concomitant therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Moreover, cross-tolerance also develops to short-acting beta2-agonists used for protection against bronchoconstrictor stimuli as a result of LABA-induced down-regulation, desensitisation and prolonged occupancy of beta2-adrenoceptors. The exact role of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphism in determining tolerance with LABAs requires further prospective clinical studies evaluating long-term effects on outcomes such as exacerbations in patients with relevant genotypes and haplotypes. The next decade will provide challenging issues for clinicians with respect to defining further the role of LABAs as add-on controller therapy, particularly in evaluating the long-term effects of combination inhalers on inflammatory outcomes and airway remodelling.     

Recent advances in corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma

The currently available therapy for asthma is highly effective and is able to control the disease in the majority of patients. There are two types of treatments for asthma: rapid relief of symptoms, used as needed and long-term control, used on a regular basis. Rapid relief is provided by short-acting beta2-agonists and anticholinergics. The control of asthma is achieved by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), theophylline, long acting beta2-agonists and antileukotrienes. Beta2-agonists and corticosteroids dominate asthma therapy, with over 65% of the market share. Corticosteroids are the most effective drugs available to clinicians for the control of inflammation in patients with asthma. ICS have revolutionized the treatment of asthma and are now the first-line treatment for chronic asthma in all ages.     

Ciclesonide: a review of its use in the management of asthma

Ciclesonide (Alvesco) is an inhaled corticosteroid used in the preventative treatment of persistent bronchial asthma in adults, adolescents and, in some countries, children. The drug is delivered by a non-chlorofluorocarbon hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). In the lungs, ciclesonide is converted to an active metabolite, which is responsible for the beneficial effects of the drug in patients with asthma. Ciclesonide and its active metabolite have low systemic bioavailability and therefore have a low potential to produce systemic adverse events. Inhaled ciclesonide delivered by HFA-MDI is effective in the prophylactic treatment of persistent asthma in adults, adolescents and children, and is generally well tolerated. In general, ciclesonide improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms and rescue medication use in adults and adolescents with asthma of varying severity. The drug is generally no less effective than other inhaled corticosteroids with regard to maintaining or improving lung function and may have a more favourable tolerability profile than some other agents in this class. Ciclesonide has also shown efficacy in paediatric patients with asthma. Data on its long-term effects on other clinical outcomes, such as asthma exacerbations, would be of interest. Further comparative and long-term studies would also be beneficial in order to definitively position ciclesonide with respect to other inhaled corticosteroids. In the meantime, ciclesonide offers an effective and well tolerated first-line preventative treatment option for persistent asthma.     

Salmeterol xinafoate. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in reversible obstructive airways disease.

Salmeterol xinafoate, like salbutamol (albuterol), is a saligenin derivative, and a selective beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist. It produces bronchodilation for at least 12 hours following inhalation of a single 50 micrograms dose. Salmeterol is intended for regular twice-daily treatment of reversible airways obstruction and not for immediate symptomatic relief, and when used in this manner, 50 micrograms twice daily is more effective than salbutamol 200 micrograms or terbutaline 500 micrograms administered 4 times daily, or individually titrated oral doses of theophylline in improving objective and subjective criteria of efficacy in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Salmeterol 100 micrograms inhaled twice daily may provide better control than the lower dose in patients with severe asthma. The long duration of effect of salmeterol makes it particularly suitable for treating patients with nocturnal asthma in whom it improves sleep quality. The place of salmeterol, like that of other beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists used regularly in the treatment of asthma, is being debated. Patients in need of regular beta 2-agonist therapy should also be regarded as candidates for inhaled corticosteroids to counteract underlying inflammation. Thus, salmeterol may be particularly useful in patients requiring regular treatment with beta 2-agonists for nocturnal asthma and results of trials in progress involving large numbers of patients are awaited with interest.     

Actual use of inhaled corticosteroids and risk of hospitalisation: a case-control study

Background: The relationship between therapy and adverse outcome in asthma is debated especially for naturally occurring situations. This is due in part to insufficient information regarding actual use of medications. Objective: This study was conducted to clarify the relationship between actual intake of anti-asthma drugs and asthma hospitalisation, considered as an outcome. Methods: A case-control study was performed. Patients hospitalised for an asthma exacerbation were matched to community controls identified in surrounding general practices. Patients were questioned to identify prior use of anti-asthma medications, level of use of inhaled corticosteroids and attitude towards therapy. Results: Twenty-three cases and 31 matched controls were interviewed. Cases tended to have more severe asthma than controls, as judged by more frequent use of oral corticosteroids. Cases tended to make more frequent use of oral xanthines and inhaled anticholinergics, but the proportion of patients using inhaled β₂-adrenoceptor agonists and inhaled corticosteroids was similar in both groups. Use of lower doses of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation, while higher dosage was associated with␣decreased risk. Cases and controls differed as to their answers to a questionnaire concerning attitudes: cases expressed less interest in optimal usage of inhaled␣corticosteroids than controls; they also expressed more confidence in inhaled β₂-agonists. When both risks were combined, overconfidence in β₂-agonists and suboptimal use of inhaled steroids, the relationship with hospitalisation was significant (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.1; 26.1). Conclusion: The results suggest that patients' attitudes to inhaled corticosteroids and actual consumption of these medications are directly related to adverse outcome in asthma. Received: 12 April 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 7 October 1996     

Benefits and risks of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Inhaled corticosteroids have a proven benefit in the management of asthma, but until recently, their efficacy in non-asthmatic, smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not evidence-based. Airway inflammation in COPD differs from inflammation in asthma. Some studies have shown an effect of inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation in COPD but the clinical relevance of these results are unknown. Short-term studies evaluating the effect of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD were associated with no or modest improvements in lung function. Data from five, long-term, large studies have provided evidence that prolonged treatment with inhaled corticosteroids does not modify the rate of decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) in patients with COPD and no reversibility to short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists. FEV(1) was slightly improved over the first 6 months of treatment in two studies and lower airway reactivity in response to methacholine challenge has been observed. Improvement of respiratory symptoms and health status was also reported in three studies. A reduction in the rate of exacerbations was observed in two studies. No survival benefit was demonstrated in any study. The advantage of using inhaled, rather than oral, corticosteroids is a reduction in adverse effects for the same therapeutic effect, because inhaled corticosteroids rely more on topical action than systemic activity. The long-term safety of inhaled corticosteroids is not known in patients with COPD. However, topical adverse effects, and systemic effects such as a decrease of bone density of lumbar spine and femur and cutaneous adverse effects, have been reported in patients with COPD after 3 years of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.