The impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on clinical outcomes of patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

We performed a retrospective study to analyse the characteristics and clinical outcomes of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and compare with those without HBV infection. The occurrence of hepatitis after withdrawal of prophylactic antiviral treatment on completion of chemotherapy was also assessed. The HBsAg‐positive patients were given prophylactic antiviral treatment until 6 months after finishing chemotherapy. A total of 81 patients were recruited with 16 in the HBsAg‐positive group and 65 in the HBsAg‐negative group. The clinical characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. There was no significant difference in complete remission rate between the two groups (63% in HBsAg‐positive group vs. 54% in HBsAg‐negative group, P = 0.59). There was also no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.23). Four of the 16 HBsAg‐positive patients (25%) had hepatitis after cessation of chemotherapy and prophylactic lamivudine. The mean time of onset of hepatitis was 3 months after stopping lamivudine. In conclusion, HBV infection did not appear to affect the prognosis of DLBCL patients given antiviral prophylaxis. It is reasonable to consider prophylactic antiviral therapy to extend to at least one year on completion of chemotherapy.     

Evidence of long‐lasting anti‐CD19 activity of engrafted CD19 chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells in a phase I study targeting pediatrics with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Ninety percent of relapse/refractory B‐cell acute lymphatic leukemia (R/R B‐ALL) patients can achieve complete remission (CR) after CD19‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cell therapy. However, around 50% of them relapse in 1 year. Persistent CAR‐T cell engraftment is considered as the key to remain durable remission. Here, we initiated a phase I study to treat 10 pediatric B‐ALL patients using a CD19‐targeted second generation CAR with a 4‐1BB intracellular costimulatory domain. All patients received a standard fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) preconditioning regiment, followed by a CAR‐T infusion with a median number of 0.5 (0.3‐1.58) × 10⁶ CAR+ T cells/kg. The pretreatment tumor burdens were high with a median bone marrow (BM) blasts percentage of 59.2% (7.31%‐86.2%), excluding one patient only with brain infiltration of leukemia cells (0% BM blasts). The initial CR rate was 80% (n = 8/10). Four patients (40%) experienced serious (grade > 2) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and three patients (30%) with obvious neurotoxicity. Monthly assessments of CD19+ minimal residual disease (MRD) and CAR‐T engraftment demonstrated the anti‐CD19 activity of long‐term engrafted CAR‐T cell clones in one patient for more than 2 years.     

CAR T‐cell therapy: Full speed ahead

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has dramatically shifted the landscape of treatment for lymphoid malignancies, especially diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, there continue to be significant limitations of this therapy, such as incomplete or nonsustained responses and severe toxicities in a subset of patients. Furthermore, expanding the role of CAR T‐cell therapy to new disease types is an important next step. In this review, we will highlight landmark trials for anti‐CD19 CAR T cells and first‐in‐human trials of novel CARs, as well as discuss promising innovative CAR designs that are still undergoing preclinical development. Lastly, we will discuss toxicity and mechanisms of CAR T‐cell resistance and failure, as well as potential future treatment approaches to these common issues.     

Chimeric antigen receptor‐engineered cytokine‐induced killer cells overcome treatment resistance of pre‐B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and enhance survival

Pre‐emptive cancer immunotherapy by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) using cytokine‐induced killer (CIK) cells may be beneficial to prevent relapse with a reduced risk of causing graft‐versus‐host‐disease. CIK cells are a heterogeneous effector cell population including T cells (CD3⁺ CD56^?), natural killer (NK) cells (CD3^?CD56⁺) and natural killer T (T‐NK) cells (CD3⁺ CD56⁺) that exhibit non‐major histocompatibility complex (MHC)‐restricted cytotoxicity and are generated by ex vivo expansion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of interferon (IFN)‐γ, anti‐CD3 antibody, interleukin‐2 (IL‐2) and interleukin‐15 (IL‐15). To facilitate selective target‐cell recognition and enhance specific cytotoxicity against B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL), we transduced CIK cells with a lentiviral vector encoding a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that carries a composite CD28‐CD3ζ domain for signaling and a CD19‐specific scFv antibody fragment for cell binding (CAR 63.28.z). In vitro analysis revealed high and specific cell killing activity of CD19‐targeted CIK/63.28.z cells against otherwise CIK‐resistant cancer cell lines and primary B‐ALL blasts, which was dependent on CD19 expression and CAR signaling. In a xenograft model in immunodeficient mice, treatment with CIK/63.28.z cells in contrast to therapy with unmodified CIK cells resulted in complete and durable molecular remissions of established primary pre‐B‐ALL. Our results demonstrate potent antileukemic activity of CAR‐engineered CIK cells in vitro and in vivo, and suggest this strategy as a promising approach for adoptive immunotherapy of refractory pre‐B‐ALL.     

Hepatitis B‐related serological events in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis against reactivation

Reactivation of remote hepatitis B infection (RHBI) is an important cause of morbidity in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. We analyzed the prevalence of RHBI in 205 patients who underwent HCT in our centre, serological events related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and role of lamivudine prophylaxis in HCT patients with RHBI. The prevalence of RHBI was 14% (28/205 patients). Of these 28 patients, 15 received lamivudine prophylaxis (14 anti‐HBcIgG positive and 1 only anti‐HBs positive) while 13 did not receive lamivudine prophylaxis (12 anti‐HBs positive and 1 anti‐HBcIgG positive). None in prophylaxis group developed HBV reactivation while 12 of 13 in no‐prophylaxis group reactivated (P < 0.001). The rate of HBV reactivation was 10% (21/205 patients), which included 9 patients with no evidence of RHBI pre‐transplant. We conclude that lamivudine prophylaxis protects against HBV reactivation in HCT patients with evidence of RHBI. Lamivudine prophylaxis should be used not only in patients with anti‐HBcIgG positivity but also in those with isolated anti‐HBs positivity pre‐transplant given the high rate of HBV reactivation in these patients. HBV serology cannot identify all cases with RHBI and therefore does not preclude HBV reactivation post‐transplant. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Clinical development of anti‐CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy for B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL) is the most frequent hematological malignancy. Although refined chemotherapy regimens and several new therapeutics including rituximab, a chimeric anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, have improved its prognosis in recent decades, there are still a substantial number of patients with chemorefractory B‐NHL. Anti‐CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy is expected to be an effective adoptive cell treatment and has the potential to overcome the chemorefractoriness of B‐cell leukemia and lymphoma. Recently, several clinical trials have shown remarkable efficacy of anti‐CD19 CAR T‐cell therapy, not only in B‐acute lymphoblastic leukemia but also in B‐NHL. Nonetheless, there are several challenges to overcome before introduction into clinical practice, such as: (i) further refinement of the manufacturing process, (ii) further improvement of efficacy, (iii) finding the optimal infusion cell dose, (iv) optimization of lymphocyte‐depleting chemotherapy, (v) identification of the best CAR structure, and (vi) optimization of toxicity management including cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, and on‐target off‐tumor toxicity. Several ways to solve these problems are currently under study. In this review, we describe the updated clinical data regarding anti‐CD19 CAR T‐cell therapy, with a focus on B‐NHL, and discuss the clinical implications and perspectives of CAR T‐cell therapy.     

Prophylactic effect of lamivudine on chemotherapy‐induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with solid tumour: A meta‐analysis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a remarkable risk during the chemotherapy for solid tumour patients. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are recommended as prophylaxis for the reactivation of HBV infection in some cancer patients prior to systemic chemotherapy. Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis aiming to determine the efficacy of prophylactic lamivudine on prevention of HBV reactivation and its related negative outcomes among solid tumour patients with chronic HBV infection receiving systemic chemotherapy. The primary outcome was HBV reactivation, and the secondary outcomes were HBV‐related hepatitis, chemotherapy disruption, mortality and tyrosine‐methio‐nine‐aspartate‐aspartate (YMDD) mutations. Twelve original researches involving 1,101 patients were analysed in this study. The relative risk of HBV reactivation in patients with lamivudine prophylaxis was significantly lower than that without prophylaxis (RR = 0.17, 95% CL: 0.10‐0.29, p < .00001). Lamivudine prophylaxis reduced the relative risk of hepatitis (p < .00001), chemotherapy disruptions (p = .01) and mortality (p = .08) due to HBV reactivation. Lamivudine prophylaxis is effective in reducing HBV reactivation and its related negative outcomes, such as hepatitis and chemotherapy disruption and mortality among chemotherapeutic solid tumour patients with chronic HBV infection. Future studies should lay more emphasis on the early HBV screening, mode of treatment and duration of NAs prophylaxis among solid tumour patients receiving chemotherapy.     

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus after rituximab‐containing treatment in patients with CD20‐positive B‐cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after rituximab‐containing chemotherapy in patients with B‐cell lymphoma has been recognized as a potentially serious complication in HBV immune patients.

METHODS:

To determine the HBV reactivation in patients treated with rituximab, a retrospective study of HBV‐related markers was performed before and after rituximab‐containing treatment in 261 consecutive patients with CD20‐positive B‐cell lymphoma.

RESULTS:

Of the 261 patients, 230 patients were tested for both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc) before treatment. Fifty‐six (24.3%) of 230 patients were anti‐HBc positive, and the remaining 174 (75.6%) patients were anti‐HBc negative. Among the 56 anti‐HBc–positive patients, 5 (8.9%) became HBsAg positive (HBV reactivation), whereas none of the 174 anti‐HBc–negative patients became HBsAg positive with a median follow‐up of 24 months (P = .001). Among the 5 patients with HBV reactivation, 4 were negative for antibody to HBsAg (anti‐HBs), and 1 patient was positive for anti‐HBs. All 5 of these patients were treated successfully with entecavir on detection of HBsAg, although 4 of the 5 patients exhibited mild to moderate elevation of alanine aminotransferase. Among 56 anti‐HBc–positive patients, those negative for anti‐HBs had a higher probability of developing HBV reactivation compared with those positive for anti‐HBs (4 of 19; 21.1% vs 1 of 37; 2.7%, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with isolated anti‐HBc are at high risk of HBV reactivation and should be monitored closely for HBsAg, anti‐HBs, HBV‐DNA, and transaminase levels during and after rituximab‐containing treatment. Although preemptive use of entecavir enabled successful management of HBV reactivation, mild to moderate hepatic flare was still observed. These approaches should be further evaluated in a prospective study with regard to clinical usefulness, safety, and cost‐effectiveness. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy

Aim: The effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy on hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with prior resolved hepatitis B is not fully understood. Methods: From January 2006 to December 2010, 43 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative/anti‐hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) positive patients with newly diagnosed unresectable HCC were enrolled in the study. All underwent TACE therapy. Results: Four patients (9.3%) developed HBV reactivation with mild/moderate hepatitis. The median number of TACE cycles received was 3.5 (range 3–4 cycles). The median time interval between the occurrence of HBV reactivation and the completion of TACE therapy was 3 months (range 1–5 months) and their median HBV DNA level was 1.58 × 10⁴ IU/mL (range, 1.65 × 10³–6.42 × 10⁴ IU/mL). After the introduction of lamivudine at the occurrence of HBV reactivation, all had resolution of hepatitis. An exploratory analysis indicated that significant predictors of HBV reactivation included increased serum total bilirubin coexisting with cirrhosis and the total number of cycles of TACE received. Conclusion: The administration of TACE therapy may increase the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg‐negative/anti‐HBc‐positive patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC. Further studies are warranted to explore the optimal management of HBV reactivation in patients with prior resolved hepatitis B.     

长、短疗程口服抗病毒药预防急性髓系白血病患者乙型肝炎病毒再激活的观察研究

背景与目的：乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)再激活是急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia,AML)合并HBV感染的患者接受诱导和巩固化疗期间严重并发症之一,核苷类抗HBV药物(包括拉米夫定和恩替卡韦等)已成为预防和抢先治疗HBV再激活主要抗病毒药物。该研究观察并探究AML合并HBV感染患者化疗前后长疗程和短疗程口服核苷类抗HBV药物预防病毒再激活的临床疗效和安全性。方法：回顾性分析29例AML合并HBV感染并接受至少4个疗程化疗患者的临床资料。根据患者口服核苷类抗HBV药物预防治疗前HBV表面抗原(hepatitis B surface antigen,HBsAg)含量以及抗HBV药物持续服用时间分为4个亚组,系统分析和比较不同亚组患者HBV再激活情况和药物不良反应。结果：长疗程预防(long course prophylaxis group,LCP)组,即口服抗HBV药物持续至化疗结束后6个月以上,该组患者的HBV再激活率和HBV相关性肝炎发生率分别为5.56%(1/18)和0%(0/18),明显低于短疗程预防(short course prophylaxis group,SCP)组患者(即口服抗HBV药物持续至化疗结束后1个月以内)的45.45%(5/11)和36.36%(4/11),差异有统计学意义(P=0.018和P=0.014),而LCP和SCP组患者的HBV原发耐药率分别为11.11%(2/18)和9.09%(1/11),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。进一步亚组分析显示,预防治疗前HBsAg阳性患者(HBsAg大于等于0.05 IU/mL)经长疗程预防,其HBV再激活率和HBV相关性肝炎发生率分别为8.33%(1/12)和0%(0/12),明显低于SCP组,66.67%(4/6)和66.67%(4/6),差异有统计学意义(P=0.022和P=0.005);同时,LCP和SCP组中HBsAg(+)患者的HBV原发耐药率分别为8.33%(1/12)和16.67%(1/6),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,LCP组中HBsAg阴性患者(HBsAg小于0.05 IU/mL)的HBV再激活率、肝炎发生率和原发耐药率与SCP组中HBsAg(-)患者比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LCP和SCP组患者均未发生3级以上药物毒性反应。结论：长疗程口服核苷类抗HBV药物是降低AML合并HBsAg(+)感染患者化疗后病毒再激活以及病毒相关事件发生率有效而且安全性良好的预防治疗方案。     

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Receiving Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BackgroundBruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are used to treat B-cell hematologic malignancies. Ibrutinib has been associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We sought to identify patients with hematologic malignancies who developed HBV reactivation after receiving first-generation (ibrutinib) or second-generation (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) BTK inhibitors.MethodsWe retrospectively studied all consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies with past HBV infection (HBV surface antigen [HBsAg] negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc] positive) or chronic HBV infection (HBsAg positive and anti-HBc positive) treated with BTK inhibitors at our institution from November 1, 2015, through November 1, 2022.ResultsOf 82 patients initially identified, 53 were excluded (11 because of false-positive anti-HBc results, and 42 because they were receiving anti-HBV prophylaxis owing to recent receipt of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). The 29 remaining patients were further analyzed and 3 (10%; 2/28 with past and 1/1 with chronic HBV infection) were found to have HBV reactivation. One patient received ibrutinib, and 2 received acalabrutinib. All developed HBV-associated hepatitis requiring anti-HBV therapy and survived. One patient continued receiving acalarutinib. Among the patients with past HBV infection, 13 received ibrutinib and 1 (8%) had HBV reactivation; 14 received acalabrutinib and 1 (7%) had HBV reactivation (P = 1.0).ConclusionsHBV reactivation risk is intermediate in patients with past HBV infection who receive BTK inhibitors. For patients with past HBV infection who received BTK inhibitors, data are insufficient to recommend universal anti-HBV prophylaxis, but monitoring for HBV reactivation is warranted.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation and role of antiviral prophylaxis in lymphoma patients with past hepatitis B virus infection who are receiving chemoimmunotherapy

BACKGROUND:

Individuals who had past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection appeared to clear their serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) while producing antibody to the hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAb), which is detectable in their serum. Currently, it is uncertain whether patients with past HBV infection require routine antiviral prophylaxis during chemotherapy, although some cancer agencies recommend its routine use. The objective of the current study was to determine the prevalence of past HBV infection in patients with lymphoma and its relevance in terms of HBV‐related complications.

METHODS:

The authors reviewed 430 patients with lymphoma from May 2006 to May 2008.

RESULTS:

Among the 430 patients, 233 had both the HBsAg and HBcAb tests performed, whereas 197 had only the HBsAg test performed. Among those with both tests performed, 34.3% (80 of 233) were HBcAb positive only. Of these 80 patients, 58 had a concomitant HBV DNA level test, which was positive in 3 (5.2%). Of the 67 patients with past and 26 with chronic HBV infection who received chemotherapy, HBV reactivation occurred in 1.5% and 42.3% of patients, respectively (P<.0001). Prophylactic lamivudine was administered in 7 (10.4%) patients with past HBV infection and in 18 (69.2%) with chronic HBV infection.

CONCLUSIONS:

The low rate of HBV reactivation reported in our study coupled with the high prevalence of past HBV infection in an endemic area suggests that routine usage of antiviral prophylaxis may not be required for all patients with past HBV infection. Close surveillance remains a reasonable and viable option for the majority of patients. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

The acceleration of CAR‐T therapy in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

Recent advances in diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas have included both identification of high‐risk subtypes characterized by multiply relapsed and/or refractory disease as well as novel treatment in the form of cellular therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐T cell therapy is a recently developed approach to address the poor outcomes in this patient population. The CAR‐T cell construct has evolved although several iterations as it transitioned from the lab to the clinic. Three major studies have evaluated the efficacy of CD19‐directed CAR‐T cell therapy in aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma; each demonstrating durable complete remissions in heavily pretreated patients. The cost of this remarkable therapy, however, includes cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity shortly after administration as well as delayed infectious complications due to B‐cell aplasia. Future investigations are focused on the optimizing both safety and efficacy of CAR‐T cell therapy.     

Risk of hepatitis B reactivation and the role of novel agents and stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection

BackgroundThe purpose of the study is to analyse the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and its incidence of reactivation among multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated in the era of novel therapy in an endemic Asian setting.Patients and methodsFrom 2000 to 2008, 273 patients with newly diagnosed MM were screened for the presence of hepatitis B virus surface antigen and HBV core antibody. HBV-infected patients were prospectively followed for reactivation with serial monitoring of serum alanine transferase and HBV DNA load. The patterns of HBV reactivation in relation to treatment received, exposure to high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) and novel agents were studied.ResultsThe prevalence of HBV infection was 5.5%. Three cases of HBV reactivation despite lamivudine prophylaxis were reported. Two patients reactivated 3–5 months after HDT/ASCT while receiving thalidomide maintenance and one reactivated 3 years after HDT/ASCT and shortly after bortezomib salvage therapy. Emergence of a mutant HBV strain was documented in one patient.ConclusionsUse of prophylaxis may reduce but will not preclude HBV reactivation. Highest risk occurs during immune reconstitution phase of HDT/ASCT. The role of immunomodulatory agents in HBV reactivation needs to be further elucidated. Separate HBV prophylaxis and surveillance guidelines ought to be developed for patients with MM.     

An argument for the universal prophylaxis of hepatitis B infection in patients receiving rituximab: a 7-year institutional experience of hepatitis screening

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in patients receiving rituximab is well described. Current international guidelines recommend HBV screening prior to the commencement of immunosuppressive therapy. However, adherence to such protocols has not previously been studied. We therefore audited screening practices and clinical outcomes in patients prescribed rituximab since its introduction in a large metropolitan health service. All patients receiving rituximab over an 88-month period were identified via pharmacy records. Medical records and laboratory results were reviewed to determine the timing and type of hepatitis screening. HBV flares were identified and correlated with clinical outcomes and any screening or prophylaxis given. Rituximab was given to 355 patients over 88 months (average age, 61 years; 51% male, 48% born overseas); 83% received rituximab for treatment of a hematological malignancy. HBV screening occurred in 31% of patients and, of these, 66% had pre-emptive screening. Five patients given cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab experienced HBV flares. Four died from viral reactivation. None received antiviral prophylaxis. Hepatitis screening rates in patients receiving rituximab in this study were lower than recommended in clinical guidelines. The identification of five patients with clinically important flares and four deaths in this group highlight the critical need to identify at-risk patients and provide timely prophylactic antiviral therapy to prevent serious morbidity and mortality. Even those with evidence of HBV seroconversion are at risk for fatal flares without active prophylactic antiviral therapy.     

Immune reconstitution of B‐cell lymphoma patients receiving CHOP‐based chemotherapy containing rituximab

Sixty‐six B‐cell lymphoma patients were treated with a CHOP‐based chemotherapy containing rituximab (R‐CHOP‐like regimen). Immune reconstitution was assessed by measuring lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulins. Fifty‐five patients (83.3%) underwent six cycles of the R‐CHOP‐like regimen. CD19⁺ and CD20⁺ cells were completely eliminated from the peripheral blood after one cycle of the R‐CHOP‐like regimen; they were detected again 6 months after the therapy. One year after the therapy, B‐cell numbers recovered to their level at diagnosis and almost doubled 2 years after the therapy. The lowest numbers of CD3⁺, CD8⁺ and CD56⁺ cells were seen after three cycles of the regimen, but continued to increase until 1 year after the therapy, remaining stable thereafter. CD4⁺ T‐cells were at their lowest after six cycles of the regimen and recovered slowly for 2 years after the therapy; however, their numbers were still lower than that at diagnosis. Immunoglobulins decreased over six cycles of the R‐CHOP‐like regimen and then recovered gradually for 2 years after the therapy. The percentage of IgG, IgA and IgM 2 years after the therapy compared with those at diagnosis was 93.9%, 90.1%, 76.3%, respectively. Twelve infectious complications occurred which consisted of three febrile neutropenia, three Herpes Zoster, two tympanitis, two Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia and two hepatitis B virus reactivation. B‐cells required 1 year and CD4⁺ T‐cells and immunoglobulins needed 2 years to recover after the therapy. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Managing the toxicities of CAR T‐cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has the potential to revolutionize the management of B‐cell lymphomas and possibly other cancers. Two anti‐CD19 CAR T‐cell products, axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel, have been approved for the management of relapsed/refractory large B‐cell lymphoma after two lines of systemic therapy. Additional trials are ongoing to evaluate these and other CAR T products at earlier stages of the disease course as well as in other lymphomas. While the potential to induce durable remissions with a single CAR T‐cell infusion even in patients who are chemorefractory has generated much enthusiasm in the field, practitioners need to familiarize themselves with the unique toxicities associated with these therapies. This review will discuss the grading and management of the two most common toxicities, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), observed acutely after this therapy. In addition, late toxicities including prolonged cytopenias and on‐target off‐tumor effects will be reviewed.     

Why, when, and how to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a serious clinical problem in HBV carriers undergoing chemotherapy. The clinical course of HBV reactivation can be separated into 2 phases: 1) an increase in HBV replication and 2) hepatic injury. Patients with resolved HBV infections (negative for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], and positive for both hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc] and/or hepatitis B surface antibody) can experience HBV reactivation, and Western guidelines recommend that not only HBsAg but also anti-HBc be screened before initiation of chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Several meta-analyses have repeatedly confirmed the prophylactic role of lamivudine in preventing HBV reactivation. In conclusion, screening for HBV is required before chemotherapy, and prophylactic antiviral therapy can reduce not only the incidence of HBV reactivation but also HBV-related morbidity and mortality.     

The effect of prophylactic lamivudine on hepatitis B virus reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing prolonged rituximab therapy

The association of prolonged rituximab therapy and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the role of lamivudine prophylaxis remain undefined. The prevalence and mortality of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with DLBCL undergoing rituximab-based treatment, who received prophylactic treatment with or without lamivudine, were retrospectively analyzed. From January 2003 to December 2009, there were 50 patients enrolled in the study, among of which 30 received the prophylactic treatment of lamivudine and 20 without prophylactic treatment of lamivudine. Among of the 50 patients, seven patients received further rituximab maintenance, once every 3 months for 2 years. Compared with lamivudine treatment group, it showed that there was significantly higher prevalence of HBV reactivation (60.0% vs 13.3%, P = .001), severe hepatitis (45.0% vs 6.7%, P = .004), and mortality (25.0% vs 3.3%, P = .032) in non-lamivudine prophylactic group; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the HBV DNA levels at reactivation (3.94 × 10⁶ vs 8.30 × 10⁵ copies/ml, P = .47) and the time from first dose of rituximab to HBV reactivation(207 vs 386 days, P = .28). For patients undergoing further rituximab maintanence treatment, the prevalence and mortality of HBV reactivation were 71.4 and 28.6%, respectively. The prevalence and mortality of HBV reactivation are 66.7% vs 75.0% (P = 1.00) and 0 vs 50.0% (P = .43) in lamivudine prophylactic and non-lamivudine prophylactic groups, respectively. The effect of lamivudine prophylaxis on preventing HBV reactivation was found to be less in patients undergoing longer duration of rituximab treatment. A longer duration of rituximab treatment contributed to higher morbidity and mortality of HBV reactivation in HbsAg-positive patients with DLBCL. Further study is warranted for the optimal management of hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation     

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor prophylaxis after transplant for Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) administration after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may carry a survival benefit in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Therefore, we investigated whether TKI prophylaxis for negative‐minimal residual disease (MRD) after HSCT would improve patient outcomes in this nationwide retrospective cohort study. We included patients with Ph+ ALL who underwent their first allogeneic HSCT between 2001 and 2016, received TKI before HSCT, and achieved negative‐MRD status within 180 days after HSCT. Of 850 patients for inclusion, 50 patients received TKI prophylaxis, mostly imatinib or dasatinib (median dose: 400 mg with imatinib and 40 mg with dasatinib). In a multivariate analysis, disease status at HSCT was the sole risk factor for relapse (hazard ratio, 3.58; P < .001 for positive‐MRD with complete remission [CR] and hazard ratio, 6.13; P < .001 for active disease). TKI prophylaxis was not associated with a decreased risk of relapse or superior overall survival in either the whole cohort or in the analysis limited to negative‐MRD or positive‐MRD with CR1 at HSCT. Meanwhile, TKI prophylaxis limited to dasatinib might be associated with a decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.34; P = .140), unlike imatinib. Alternative strategies using new‐generation TKI for high‐risk patients are warranted to improve the outcomes after allogeneic HSCT.