Efficacy of pramipexole in restless legs syndrome: a six-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study (effect-RLS study).

We evaluated the efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in restless legs syndrome (RLS) for 6 weeks. Overall, 345 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either placebo (n = 115) or pramipexole (n = 230) with a starting dose of 0.125 mg/day. The dose was individually optimized according to the Patient Global Impression (PGI) assessment, up to a maximum of 0.75 mg/day. The primary endpoint consisted of two assessments: the change from baseline in the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) and the proportion of patients with Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) assessments of "much/very much improved" (CGI-I responders) at week 6. Secondary endpoints included PGI and IRLS responder rates. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. At baseline, mean IRLS scores were 24.9 (placebo) and 24.7 (pramipexole), representing severely affected patients. After 6 weeks, adjusted mean reductions (+/-SE) in IRLS score were 5.7 (+/-0.9) for placebo (median dose 0.47 mg/day) and 12.3 (+/-0.6) for pramipexole (median dose 0.35 mg/day; P < 0.0001). CGI-I responder rates were 32.5% (placebo) and 62.9% (pramipexole) (P < 0.0001). For all secondary endpoints, pramipexole showed superior results. Pramipexole was well tolerated throughout the study.     

Efficacy and safety of pramipexole in idiopathic restless legs syndrome: a polysomnographic dose-finding study--the PRELUDE study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of pramipexole (0.125-0.75 mg/d) on polysomnographic (PSG) measures and patient and clinician ratings of restless legs syndrome (RLS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=109) with moderate to severe RLS were randomized to placebo or fixed doses of pramipexole during a 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study. RESULTS: In each pramipexole dose group, the periodic limb movements during time in bed index (PLMI) decreased significantly, compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference in log-transformed data: 0.125 mg, -1.54; 0.25 mg, -1.93; 0.50 mg, -1.89; and 0.75 mg, -1.52; P<0.0001). At all doses, International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) scores were also significantly reduced, with the greatest adjusted mean reduction in the 0.50mg group (-17.01). At all but the lowest pramipexole dose, the percentage of responders (> or =50% reduction of IRLS score) was substantially higher than for placebo (61.9-77.3, vs 33.3%). In the pramipexole groups, 50.0-77.3% of patients rated their condition as 'much better' or 'very much better', compared with 38.1% of patients in the placebo group (P=0.0139 for the 0.50 mg dose). Clinical global impressions (CGI) scale ratings of 'much improved' or 'very much improved' were given to 61.9-86.4% of patients in the pramipexole groups, compared with 42.9% in the placebo group (P<0.05 for the 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg groups). Pramipexole was well tolerated and did not produce somnolence at any dose. CONCLUSION: Pramipexole is effective and safe in the treatment of both objective and subjective facets of RLS.     

普拉克索治疗原发性不宁腿综合征的疗效和安全陛观察

目的 观察普拉克索对我国原发性不宁腿综合征(RLS)患者的治疗效果以及可能发生的不良反应. 方法 选择自2009年5月至11月在哈尔滨医科大学第二附属医院神经内科就诊的10例中到重度原发性RLS患者,给予普拉克索0.125～0.75mg/d,每日睡前2～3h顿服,持续治疗6周.利用国际RLS研究小组的RLS严重程度量表(mLS)、临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)、患者总体印象量表(PGI)和Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)对患者治疗前后的RLS症状严重程度和嗜睡程度进行评估.并对结果进行统计学分析,同时记录不良反应.结果 (1)治疗后患者的IRLS评分较治疗前平均降低73.7%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),9例患者IRLS评分降低在50%以上;(2)治疗结束时,8例患者PGI评估选择"很好"或"非常好",9例患者CGI-I评估为"明显改善"或"非常明显改善";(3)患者ESS评分在治疗后较治疗前平均降低3.80±1.75,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)1例患者在治疗末期加量至0.5mg/d时出现轻度恶心,胃区不适,治疗结束停药2 d后症状自行消失;(5)1例患者首次用药后双下肢感觉异常和睡眠障碍即有明显改善.结论 为期6周的临床实验表明,在每日口服剂量为0.125～0.75 mg时,普拉克索对于我国原发性RLS的治疗是安全有效的.     

Open-label study of the long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole in patients with Restless Legs Syndrome (extension of the PRELUDE study)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) using physician and patient RLS ratings, along with subjective assays of sleep parameters, in a 26-week, open-label trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 107 Finnish adults with moderate to severe RLS, pramipexole initiated at 0.125 mg/day was titrated to a maximum 0.75 mg/day. Efficacy evaluations included the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS), Patient Global Impression (PGI) scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Subjective Sleep Quality was assessed by patient ratings of sleep and morning tiredness. Safety was documented by Adverse Events reported in >5% of patients. RESULTS: The mean reduction in IRLS score was 73.5% (P<0.05). The IRLS responder rate, defined by score reduction of >or= 50%, was 81.3%. On the PGI scale, 89.7% of patients rated themselves as "very much" or "much" better. By CGI-I assessment, 94.8% of patients were considered either "very much" or "much" improved. Mean ESS score showed a modest but statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) within the normal range, indicating that long-term pramipexole did not increase daytime sleepiness. On the SF-36 all 8 domains showed improvement, 5 of them statistically significant (P<0.05) and 4 of these 5 (role-physical, bodily pain, vitality, and role-emotional) by >10 points on a 100-point scale. Subjective Sleep Quality also improved. The most frequent Adverse Events were influenza (17.8%), headache (15.0%), and fatigue (10.3%). CONCLUSION: Pramipexole is well tolerated and effective for long-term treatment of RLS.     

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of pramipexole versus ropinirole in the treatment of restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE: In the absence of comparative trials a meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the non-ergot derived dopamine agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, in restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: Frequentist fixed and random-effects models were pre-specified for the direct comparisons and a Bayesian approach for the indirect comparison. Efficacy outcomes included the mean change from baseline in the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score and the percentage of responders on the clinical global impressions - improvement scale (CGI-I). Safety outcomes included the incidence of withdrawal and adverse events. RESULTS: The direct meta-analysis confirmed superior efficacy for both treatments versus placebo for the IRLS (pramipexole: -5.45; 95% CI: -7.70; -3.20; ropinirole: -3.16; 95% CI: -4.26; -2.05) and the CGI-I (pramipexole: OR=2.98; 95% CI: 2.08; 4.26; ropinirole: OR=1.99; 95% CI: 1.52; 2.60). Placebo comparisons showed a significantly higher incidence of nausea for pramipexole (p<0.01), whereas nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and somnolence were significantly higher for ropinirole (all p<0.01). The indirect comparison showed with a probability of > or = 95%, a superior reduction in the mean IRLS score (-2.33; 95% credibility interval [CrI]: -4.23; -0.41), higher CGI-I response rate (OR=1.50; 95% CrI: 0.97; 2.32) and significantly lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness for pramipexole compared to ropinirole. CONCLUSION: Differences in efficacy and tolerability favouring pramipexole over ropinirole can be observed. These findings should be further confirmed in head-to-head clinical trials.     

A method to switch from oral dopamine agonists to rotigotine in patients with restless legs syndrome and mild augmentation

BackgroundWe examined the short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability of a cross-titration algorithm from oral dopamine agonists to the rotigotine transdermal patch in patients dissatisfied with their restless legs syndrome (RLS) treatment, predominantly with mild augmentation.MethodsPatients with RLS (n = 20) were recruited at a single site. The cross-titration consisted of decreasing oral dopaminergic agents (ropinirole by 1 mg or pramipexole by 0.25 mg) and increasing rotigotine by 1 mg every two days. Efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at one, three, six and 12 months after the switch.ResultsPatients had moderate–severe RLS symptoms at the baseline (mean international restless legs syndrome (IRLS) score 19.4 ± 5.5); 85% had augmentation and 45% reported afternoon RLS symptoms. The baseline mean pramipexole equivalent dose was 0.6 ± 0.3 mg. At Week 5, 85% (17/20) had successfully switched from their oral dopamine agonist to rotigotine (mean dose 2.5 ± 0.6 mg; change in IRLS score: −6.7 ± 8.4, p = 0.002); 14 patients were CGI-I responders (much or very much improved). Three patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. Twelve months after cross-titration, 10 patients continued on rotigotine, of whom four required either higher doses of rotigotine or supplemental RLS medication compared with their optimal Week 5 dose; five patients withdrew due to AEs and two due to lack of efficacy.ConclusionA cross-titration to rotigotine was efficacious after five weeks in 70% of patients dissatisfied with RLS treatment, most of whom had mild augmentation. At one year following the medication switch, 50% had discontinued rotigotine due to lack of continued efficacy or side effects.     

A dose-ranging study of pramipexole for the symptomatic treatment of restless legs syndrome: Polysomnographic evaluation of periodic leg movements and sleep disturbance

Objective: To evaluate, both polysomnographically and by subjective scales, the efficacy and safety profile of pramipexole for restless legs syndrome (RLS) via a 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study.Methods: At baseline and after 3 weeks, periodic limb movements (PLM) and sleep parameters were assessed by polysomnography, and patients self-assessed their sleep disturbance and overall RLS severity using the international RLS study group rating scale (IRLS). Four pramipexole doses were evaluated: 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg/d. Data from 107 patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis.Results: For pramipexole recipients, the primary outcome measure, PLM per hour in bed asleep or awake (the PLM index, or PLMI), decreased by a median of ?26.55 to ?52.70 depending on dosage group, vs. ?3.00 for placebo (p < 0.01 or ?0.001 for each group vs. placebo; Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test). Improvements in the secondary endpoints of PLM while asleep and while awake were also significantly superior for pramipexole. At 3 weeks, all pramipexole doses reduced the median for PLM while asleep to levels considered normal (<5 PLM/h). Except for delta-sleep time and awakenings/arousals, sleep parameters remained unchanged or favored pramipexole. Median sleep latency was reduced by ?5.00 to ?11.75 min in the pramipexole groups, vs. ?2.00 for placebo (p < 0.05 for all groups except 0.25 mg/d). Median total sleep time increased by 25.75–66.75 min, vs. 25.50 (p < 0.05 for 0.50 mg/d), and median time in stages 2–4/rapid eye movement (REM) sleep increased by 37.00–68.00 min, vs. 26.75 (p < 0.05 for 0.50 mg/d). By subjective IRLS ratings, all pramipexole doses were significantly superior to placebo. Safety analysis demonstrated no dose-dependent increase in adverse events, and no drug-related increase in daytime somnolence was observed.Conclusions: Pramipexole is effective and well tolerated in RLS, most notably among objective measures, for reducing PLM and decreasing sleep latency. Although other sleep parameters showed lesser, usually insignificant change, patients’ subjective ratings of RLS severity and sleep disturbance were significantly improved (p ? 0.0023).     

Ropinirole is effective in the treatment of restless legs syndrome. TREAT RLS 2: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological condition with significant impact on sleep and quality of life (QoL). This double-blind, randomized, 12-week, multinational study compared the efficacy and safety of ropinirole and placebo in RLS. In total, 267 outpatients with moderate-to-severe RLS were randomly assigned to ropinirole (0.25-4.0 mg/day) or placebo, 1 to 3 hours before bedtime. The primary endpoint was the change in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score at week 12. Key secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients showing significant improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale at week 12 and changes in IRLS and CGI-I scale scores at week 1. Other measures included the Medical Outcomes Study sleep scale and Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life questionnaire. Improvements were significantly greater for ropinirole than placebo for change in IRLS score at week 12 (-11.2 [SE 0.76] vs. -8.7 [0.75], respectively; adjusted treatment difference -2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], -4.6, -0.4], P = 0.0197); all key secondary endpoints; sleep and QoL parameters. Adverse events were typical for dopamine agonists; disease augmentation, although not directly assessed, was not reported during treatment. Ropinirole improves symptoms, associated sleep disturbance, and QoL of RLS patients and is generally well tolerated.     

Controlled withdrawal of pramipexole after 6 months of open-label treatment in patients with restless legs syndrome.

Although dopamine agonists are becoming first-line therapy for restless legs syndrome (RLS), few reports describe treatment periods exceeding 12 weeks. Here, 150 RLS patients who had responded to pramipexole during a 6-month run-in period (mean dose, 0.50 mg) were randomly assigned to receive placebo or continue receiving pramipexole at an individually optimized dose of 0.125 to 0.75 mg/day for a further 3 months. Patients switched to placebo reached the primary endpoint (a predefined worsening on both the Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement scale and the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale) significantly more often than patients who continued to receive pramipexole (85.5% vs. 20.5%; P < 0.0001). They also reached the primary endpoint faster, in 5 versus 42 days to a Kaplan-Meier survival estimate of 0.85 and 7 versus > 84 days to an estimate of 0.5. Over the total 9 months, clinician and patient ratings of symptoms, sleep, and quality of life identified no decline in pramipexole's benefit or tolerability. The great majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate, and of expected types. Augmentation was considered an AE, but in this population of responders it did not occur.     

Efficacy and safety of pramipexole in Japanese patients with primary restless legs syndrome: A polysomnographic randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of pramipexole on polysomnographic measures, patient ratings and a clinical rating in Japanese patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS).MethodsPatients with moderate to severe RLS having periodic limb movements in bed index (PLMI) ? 5 were randomly assigned to receive pramipexole or placebo in a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with forced titration from 0.125 to 0.75 mg/day. Both polysomnography (PSG) and the suggested immobilization test (SIT) were performed at baseline and 6 weeks after starting treatment.ResultsThe analysis of covariance of log-transformed PLMI showed that the adjusted means at the end of study were significantly smaller in the pramipexole group than in the placebo group (p = 0.0019). In all patients, variables on SIT did not show any differences between the two groups, whereas a significant improvement was shown in the pramipexole group compared with the placebo group for patients with a SIT-PLM index at baseline ? 15. Pramipexole group showed a significant reduction in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale (IRLS; p = 0.0005), a significant improvement in both Patient Global Impression (PGI; p < 0.0001) and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI-I; p = 0.0488), and a significantly greater mean reduction in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; p = 0.0016), when compared with those of placebo group at week 6.ConclusionsPramipexole is highly efficacious in the reduction of PLMI and in the improvement of subjective severity of RLS and subjective sleep disturbance caused by the disorder.     

Ropinirole is effective in the long-term management of restless legs syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) and to assess the potential for relapse after the discontinuation of active treatment. Patients with primary RLS (n = 202) received single-blind ropinirole for 24 weeks. Patients meeting treatment continuation criteria were randomized to double-blind treatment with ropinirole or placebo for a further 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients relapsing during double-blind treatment. Additional efficacy measures included time to relapse, withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, change in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score during double-blind treatment, and changes in sleep and quality of life (QoL) parameters. Significantly fewer patients relapsed on ropinirole than on placebo (32.6% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.0156). Time to relapse was longer with ropinirole and more patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy with placebo. Patients showed improvements in IRLS and CGI-I scores, sleep and QoL parameters with single-blind ropinirole, which were better maintained when ropinirole was continued during the double-blind phase, but reduced with placebo. Ropinirole was well tolerated; adverse events were typical for dopamine agonists. Ropinirole was highly effective and well tolerated in the long-term management of RLS, with pharmacological effect over 36 weeks.     

Low-dose pramipexole in the management of restless legs syndrome. An open label trial

Dopaminergic agents are considered the treatment of choice for restless legs syndrome (RLS); levodopa is the only substance licensed for this disorder in some European countries. However, in a substantial proportion of patients symptoms are not adequately controlled for a whole night due to the short half-life of levodopa or because symptom augmentation may develop. To further investigate the impact of pramipexole on the management of RLS we performed a short-term open label trial with pramipexole in 17 patients who were being insufficiently treated with levodopa or for whom pramipexole was primarily being considered because of the severity of the RLS symptoms. A single dose of 0.125-0.75 mg pramipexole (mean 0.3 +/- 0.2 mg) in the evening resulted in a significant improvement of subjective RLS symptoms as rated by the International RLS Study Group Severity Scale (IRLS scores: 29.8 +/- 4.7 baseline vs. 7.3 +/- 5.9 endpoint; p = 0.0001). Polysomnographic recordings showed a significant improvement of the periodic leg movements (PLM) index, PLM sleep arousal index, sleep-onset latency, total sleep time and sleep efficiency. All patients who had developed a worsening of RLS symptoms under levodopa recovered from daytime symptoms after their medication was switched to pramipexole. Since pramipexole was well tolerated, an ideal dosage to control RLS symptoms could be reached rapidly. Pramipexole has proven a suitable alternative in patients with moderate to severe RLS, particularly when their therapy has to be switched to a dopamine agonist.     

Acute placebo-controlled sleep laboratory studies and clinical follow-up with pramipexole in restless legs syndrome

In a single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, the acute efficacy of the dopamine agonist pramipexole was investigated in 11 restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients by sleep laboratory methods, with a clinical follow-up for 4 weeks. In 3 nights (pre-treatment, placebo and drug night), objective sleep quality was determined by polysomnography (PSG), subjective sleep and awakening quality by rating scales, objective awakening quality by psychometry. Clinical follow-up consisted of completion of the International RLS Study Group (IRLSSG) Scale, Zung Depression (SDS) and Anxiety (SAS) Scale, Quality of Life Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Concerning acute effects, an omnibus significance test for PSG variables demonstrated a global difference between placebo and pramipexole, but none between pre-treatment and placebo. Pramipexole 0.27 mg significantly decreased the target variable periodic leg movements (PLM)/h of sleep as well as all other RLS/PLM variables and improved objective sleep efficiency and subjective sleep quality as compared with placebo. In sleep architecture, sleep stages S1 and S2 and stage shifts increased, while slow-wave sleep and SREM decreased. After 4 weeks of therapy, the total scores of the IRLSSG questionnaire, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, depression and quality of life also improved. Thus, acute pramipexole markedly reduced PLM measures and slightly improved objective and subjective sleep quality. Follow-up ratings showed a moderate improvement of RLS and sleep quality, and to a lesser extent of daytime sleepiness, depression and quality of life. The psychopathological findings as well as acute sleep architecture changes are reminiscent of those seen after activating antidepressants.     

Efficacy of gabapentin enacarbil in adult patients with severe primary restless legs syndrome

AimAssess efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) in adults with severe primary restless legs syndrome (RLS).MethodsWe pooled data from three 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (NCT00298623, NCT00365352, NCT01332305) across GEn 600-mg, GEn 1200-mg, and placebo treatment groups for severe primary RLS (baseline International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total score ≥24). Co-primary end points at week 12 were mean change from baseline in IRLS total score and proportion of responders (“much”/very much” improved) on the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression – Improvement (CGI-I) Scale. Outcomes for individual IRLS items (eg, sleep, mood, quality of life, pain, safety) were assessed.ResultsA total of 309 patients had severe primary RLS (placebo, n = 110; GEn 600 mg, n = 80; GEn 1200 mg, n = 119). GEn 600 mg and 1200 mg significantly improved least-squares mean IRLS total scores versus placebo at week 12 (placebo, −12.3; GEn 600 mg, −16.3; GEn 1200 mg, −18.0; treatment difference vs. placebo, both p <0.01). Significantly more patients with severe primary RLS treated with GEn 600 mg (64%) and 1200 mg (74%) were CGI-I responders at week 12 versus placebo (42%; p <0.01 for both GEn doses). Both GEn doses led to significant improvements in the other outcomes explored versus placebo at week 12. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were somnolence (GEn, 21–24%; placebo, 3%) and dizziness (GEn, 14–19%; placebo, 3%).ConclusionsGEn (600 mg or 1200 mg) once daily significantly improved RLS symptoms and consequences of these symptoms in severe primary RLS. The most frequent TEAEs were somnolence and dizziness.     

Pramipexole versus ropinirole: Polysomnographic acute effects in restless legs syndrome

Background : Pramipexole and ropinirole have become the first‐line treatment for restless legs syndrome. The aim of this study was to perform the first direct comparison between these two molecules in restless legs syndrome. Methods : A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, double‐night and prospective investigation was carried out in 45 consecutive naïve patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome. Each patient underwent two consecutive full‐night polysomnographies: the first baseline recording was performed without premedication and, before the second recording, first group received a single oral dose of 0.25 mg pramipexole, second group a single oral dose of 0.5 mg ropinirole, and the remaining patients received placebo. Results and Discussion : Both dopamine agonists improved restless legs syndrome symptoms and markedly suppressed periodic leg movements during sleep compared to placebo, without significant differences between pramipexole and ropinirole. No significant side effects, except for mild morning nausea (2 patients treated with ropinirole, 3 with pramipexole, and 1 with placebo), were reported. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

The acute effect of a low dosage of pramipexole on severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome: an open-label trial

BACKGROUND: Pramipexole is a D3 dopaminergic agonist that has shown a major effect on both sensory and motor manifestations of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in long-term trials. No data regarding the acute effect of low doses of pramipexole have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acute effect of a low dosage of pramipexole (0.125 mg) on sensory symptoms and motor signs of RLS and on the macro- and microstructure of sleep. METHODS: We initially recruited 13 patients affected by severe idiopathic RLS and included 10 of them in our study. For 2 consecutive nights the selected patients were evaluated. Pramipexole 0.125 mg was administered before the second night at 9:00 p.m. A visual analog scale was used to assess the sensory symptoms of RLS. The motor manifestations of RLS and the architecture of sleep were analyzed by polysomnography. RESULTS: After the acute administration of pramipexole, we observed a significant improvement of the sensory symptoms and motor signs of RLS. Several sleep macrostructure and microstructure parameters improved as well. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that low doses of pramipexole are effective in reducing sensory symptoms and motor signs of RLS, even after the first administration.     

Rotigotine improves restless legs syndrome: A 6‐month randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial in the United States

This randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial (NCT00135993) assessed efficacy and safety of the dopamine agonist rotigotine in the treatment of idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) over a 6‐month maintenance period. A total of 505 eligible participants with moderate to severe RLS (IRLS sum score ≥ 15) were randomly assigned to five groups to receive either placebo or rotigotine (0.5, 1, 2, or 3 mg/24 hr) delivered by once‐daily transdermal patch (fixed‐dose regimen). The two co‐primary efficacy parameters decreased from baseline to end of maintenance in IRLS sum score and in clinical global impressions (CGI‐1) score. On both primary measures, 2 and 3 mg/24 hr rotigotine was superior to placebo (P < 0.001). Adjusted treatment differences to placebo for the IRLS sum score were ?4.5 (95% CI: ?6.9, ?2.2) for 2 mg/24 hr rotigotine, ?5.2 (95% CI: ?7.5, ?2.9) for 3 mg/24 hr rotigotine, and for CGI item 1 ?0.65 (95% CI: ?1.0, ?0.3) and ?0.9 (95% CI: ?1.3, ?0.5) for the 2 and 3 mg/24 hr doses, respectively. Skin reactions (27%) and known dopaminergic side effects such as nausea (18.1%) and headache (11.6%) were mostly mild or moderate in rotigotine subjects. Rotigotine transdermal patches releasing 2 to 3 mg/24 hr significantly reduced the severity of RLS symptoms. Treatment efficacy was maintained throughout the 6‐month double‐blind period. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

A randomized,double-blind, 6-week,dose-ranging study of pregabalin in patients with restless legs syndrome

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the dose-related efficacy and safety of pregabalin in patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS).MethodsThis six-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose–response study randomized patients (N = 137) with moderate-to-severe idiopathic RLS in an equal ratio to placebo or pregabalin 50, 100, 150, 300, or 450 mg/day. The dose–response was characterized using an exponential decay model, which estimates the maximal effect (E_max) for the primary endpoint, the change in the International Restless Legs Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) total score from baseline to week 6 of treatment. Secondary outcomes included Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) responders, sleep assessments, and safety.ResultsThe separation of treatment effect between placebo and pregabalin began to emerge starting at week 1 which continued and increased through week 6 for all dose groups. The IRLS total score for pregabalin was dose dependent and well characterized for change from baseline at week 6. The model estimated 50% (ED₅₀) and 90% (ED₉₀) of the maximal effect in reducing RLS symptoms that occurred at pregabalin doses of 37.3 and 123.9 mg/day, respectively. A higher proportion of CGI-I responders was observed at the two highest doses of pregabalin (300 and 450 mg/day) versus placebo. Dizziness and somnolence were the most common adverse events and appeared to be dose-related.ConclusionsIn this 6-week phase 2b study, pregabalin reduced RLS symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe idiopathic RLS. The symptom reduction at week 6 was dose-dependent with 123.9 mg/day providing 90% efficacy. Pregabalin was safe and well tolerated across the entire dosing range.     

Sternberg working memory performance following treatment with pramipexole in patients with moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome

ObjectivesWe recently reported that the P300 amplitude related to the Sternberg working memory (WM) task was significantly lower in drug-naïve severe restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients than controls. Here, we evaluated the effects of pramipexole on the Sternberg WM task performance by event-related potential (ERP) study.MethodsThirteen drug-naïve RLS patients (52.0 ± 9.48 years) were enrolled in the study. Pramipexole was administered over a period of 12 weeks every night 1 h before bedtime. Two ERP studies were carried out: the first was performed just before giving the first dose of pramipexole and the second was conducted at 12–16 weeks after commencement of pramipexole administration. P300 amplitudes and reaction times were compared before and after treatment considering brain regions and memory load as within-subject factors. Clinical and sleep-related variables were correlated with P300 amplitude.ResultsAfter treatment with pramipexole, the International RLS Severity Scale (IRLS) score was significantly decreased. Sleep quality and depression were also significantly improved. Omission error was significantly reduced without significant change of commission error. Reaction time was significantly shortened, regardless of memory load size, following treatment with pramipexole. Parietal P300 amplitude was significantly increased after treatment with pramipexole for all memory load sizes. Increase of frontal P300 amplitude was significantly correlated with improvement of sleep duration, IRLS, Insomnia Severity Index, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score.ConclusionOur study suggested that pramipexole improves WM performance in patients with RLS in addition to improving RLS symptoms, sleep disturbance, and depression.     

Augmentation and tolerance with long-term pramipexole treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS)

BACKGROUND: Dopaminergic agents have become first-line treatments for restless legs syndrome (RLS). The most common serious complications of L-Dopa treatment of RLS are "augmentation", in which RLS symptoms appear earlier during the day, and tolerance, in which medication effectiveness wanes over time. The aims of this study were to assess rates of augmentation and tolerance, and their interrelationship, with pramipexole treatment of RLS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective assessment of all patients (N=59) treated for RLS with pramipexole for at least 6 months (mean duration=21.2+/-11.4 months) by the senior author. Pramipexole dosing and clinical follow-up were performed in a standardized fashion. L-Dopa was discontinued and other medications for RLS were tapered as tolerated. Rates of augmentation (need for earlier administration of the same dose of pramipexole) and tolerance (need for an increase in pramipexole dose) were determined. RESULTS: Augmentation developed in 32% (19/59), and tolerance occurred in 46% (27/59), of patients. These two complications were statistically related (P<0.05). The only clinical predictors of these complications were previous augmentation or tolerance to L-Dopa. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation and tolerance are more common with extended pramipexole treatment of RLS than has been previously reported in preliminary studies. However, these complications are generally manageable by earlier dosing or small dose increases of this agent, and only rarely require medication discontinuation.