血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶浓度及其比值对急性胰腺炎诊断价值的研究

目的探讨血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶浓度及脂肪酶／淀粉酶浓度比值在急性胰腺炎的病因分类和指导疾病的分级诊断中的作用。方法收集急性胰腺炎患者128例,按照病因分为胆源性、酒精性、其他病因三组,按照病情严重程度结合CT检查结果分为轻、中、重三组,比较各组间血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶浓度,脂肪酶／淀粉酶浓度比值的差异。结果酒精性急性胰腺炎患者的血清淀粉酶水平低于胆源性和其他病因患者（P=0．005、0．026）,胆源性和其他病因组间淀粉酶浓度差异无统计学意义。各病因分组之间,脂肪酶浓度和脂肪酶／淀粉酶浓度比值的差异均无统计学意义。按照疾病严重程度分组研究中,淀粉酶、脂肪酶浓度以及脂肪酶／淀粉酶浓度比值在各组间的差异无统计学意义。结论血清淀粉酶浓度在鉴别酒精性和非酒精性急性胰腺炎方面有指示作用,而脂肪酶浓度及脂肪酶／淀粉酶浓度比值不足以用来鉴别急性胰腺炎的病因,也不能单独作为指示疾病严重程度的指标。     

Serum lipase and amylase ratio in acute alcoholic and nonalcoholic pancreatitis by using Dupont ACA discrete clinical analyzer

This work involves a retrospective analysis of serum amylase, lipase, and lipase/amylase ratio in alcoholic and nonalcoholic patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the Dupont ACA method with respect to the lipase/amylase ratio as a discriminator, for the etiology of pancreatitis. Thirty-six consecutive patients with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were studied. These patients were divided in two groups. Group I consisted of 11 patients who had presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis. In group II, 19 patients had acute biliary pancreatitis, including two with necrotizing pancreatitis and abscess formation secondary to cholilathiasis, five cases were idiopathic in nature, and one was thought to be medication induced (hydrochlorothiazide). In all cases, the Dupont ACA discrete clinical analyzer was used to determine serum levels of amylase and lipase. Concerning the lipase/amylase ratio, the geometric mean ratio for group I was 0.32 (range: 0.11–0.86) and for group II the mean ratio was 0.22 (range: 0.04–0.93). WithP>0.1, the difference between geometric mean ratios was not statistically significant. This study reveals that the lipase/amylase ratio would not have been a good indicator of alcoholic vs nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis. Although there was no significant statistical difference between geometric means, this study does show a significant difference in the number of individuals with serum amylase >2000 IU/dl in nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis patients (8/25 showed levels above 2000 IU/dl) when compared to alcoholic acute pancreatitis patients (0/11 showed levels above 2000 IU/dl). Chi-square analysis between <2000 IU/dl and >2000 IU/dl for the nonalcoholic vs the alcoholic groups yielded aP value of 0.03.     

Lipase/amylase ratio. A new index that distinguishes acute episodes of alcoholic from nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis.

Because of observations that patients with acute episodes of alcoholic pancreatitis had high serum lipase levels whereas patients with gall stone pancreatitis had high serum amylase levels, a prospective study was undertaken to determine whether the ratio of serum lipase to serum amylase, a newly computed ratio, would discriminate between acute episodes of alcoholic and nonalcoholic pancreatitis. In phase one, 30 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis were entered into the study and divided into groups A and B. Patients with renal failure were excluded from the study. Group A consisted of 20 patients in whom the etiology of pancreatitis was alcohol. Group B consisted of 10 patients whose pancreatitis was nonalcoholic in etiology (predominantly gallstones). Serum lipase values in group A ranged 492 to 25,706 U/L (median, 3433 U/L) and in group B from 711 to 31,153 U/L (median, 1260 U/L). These differences were not significant statistically. Serum amylase values in group A ranged from 104 to 2985 U/L (median, 331 U/L) and in group B from 423 to 13,000 (median, 1187 U/L). Although these figures were statistically different (P less than 0.005), there was a considerable degree of overlap in the values between the two groups. The lipase/amylase ratio calculated from the blood sample obtained at presentation appeared to be a promising discriminatory index. The lipase/amylase ratio was calculated by using the amylase and lipase levels expressed as multiples of the upper limit of normal in each case. The lipase/amylase ratios in the alcoholic group ranged from 2.2 to 14.8, whereas the lipase/amylase ratio in nonalcoholic pancreatitis ranged from 0.31 to 1.93. These differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.005). A lipase/amylase ratio of greater than 2 was indicative of an alcoholic etiology, and a ratio of less than 2 suggested that the pancreatitis was nonalcoholic in nature. In phase two, this lipase/amylase ratio of 2 was applied prospectively to an unselected population of 21 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis. Thirteen patients had a lipase/amylase ratio of greater than 2; in 11 of them, the etiology of the pancreatitis was alcohol. Eight patients had a lipase/amylase ratio of less than 2; of them, only 1 patient had an alcoholic etiology for the pancreatitis. These differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The Admission Serum Lipase:Amylase Ratio Differentiates Alcoholic from Nonalcoholic Acute Pancreatitis

To determine whether the lipase:amylase ratio differentiates alcoholic from nonalcoholic pancreatitis, we conducted a retrospective review of charts with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis at the George Washington University Medical Center between January 1988 and July 1990. A total of 446 charts were reviewed. For a patient to be included in the subsequent analysis, the following criteria were met: 1) the patient had typical symptoms of pancreatitis, 2) serum amylase and lipase were analyzed on admission, and 3) a computerized tomographic (CT) scan or ultrasound of the abdomen was obtained within 72 h of admission. Forty-seven charts satisfied the requirements for inclusion in the study. Data collected from the charts included history of alcohol consumption, age, sex, race, admission serum amylase and serum lipase (from this the amylase:lipase ratio was calculated), peak serum amylase and serum lipase, and number of days of abdominal pain before admission. Patients with alcoholic pancreatitis had significantly lower serum amylase levels and significantly higher lipase:amylase ratios than those with nonalcoholic pancreatitis (p < 0.01). There was no difference in the serum lipase between the groups. The higher the lipase:amylase ratio, the greater the specificity of alcohol as the etiology of acute pancreatitis. Only patients with alcoholic acute pancreatitis had lipase:amylase ratios > 5.0 (sensitivity 31%, specificity 100%). Our data point to the clinical utility of the lipase:amylase ratio in differentiating alcoholic from nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm the clinical utility of this ratio.     

Lipase/amylase ratio in biliary acute pancreatitis and alcoholic acute/acutized chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic or biliary acute pancreatitis may need different therapeutic approaches. AIM: Assessing the validity of lipase/amylase ratio in differentiating biliary from alcoholic acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Nine male patients (mean age and standard deviation: 39.8 +/- 7.0 years) with alcoholic acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis (group I) and 29 patients, 8 male and 21 female (mean age: 43.6 +/-19.9 years), with biliary acute pancreatitis (group II) were evaluated. Serum lipase and amylase levels were measured in patients with symptoms for no more than 48 hours. The lipase/amylase ratio was calculated based on serum lipase and amylase levels and expressed as multiples of their respective superior reference values. RESULTS: Mean levels of serum lipase (4,814 +/- 3,670 U/L) and amylase (1,282 +/- 777 U/L) in patients of group I were comparable to group II (2,697 +/- 2,391 and 1,878 +/- 1,319 U/L, respectively), but the mean lipase/amylase ratio was significantly higher in group I (4.4 +/- 3.6) than in group II (2.2 +/- 2.2). Lipase/amylase ratio >3 occurred at significantly higher proportions in patients of group I (66.7%) than of group II (24.1%), differentiating the two groups with sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Amylase and lipase serum levels did not differ in the two groups evaluated; 2) the lipase/amylase ratio >3 was more often seen in alcoholic acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis than biliary acute pancreatitis, and it may be useful in differentiating these two causes of pancreatitis.     

The Lipase to Amylase Ratio in Acute Pancreatitis

Objectives : The ratio of serum lipase to serum amylase has been proposed to distinguish acute episodes of alcoholic from nonalcoholic pancreatitis. We evaluated the efficacy of this test in a community hospital setting. Methods : Charts of all patients discharged with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis over 19 months were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if their cre-atinine was greater than 3.0 mg/dl, if the amylase and lipase were not measured within 72 h of the onset of symptoms, or if the cause of pancreatitis was not known by the time of discharge. Results : Of the 56 patients, 31 had alcoholic pancreatitis. The lipase to amylase ratio did not differ significantly between patients with alcoholic and nonalcoholic pancreatitis. Median amylase and lipase were significantly higher in nonalcoholic pancreatitis; however, the wide ranges of both meant that neither amylase nor lipase accurately determined the cause of pancreatitis. Conclusion : The lipase to amylase ratio does not appear to be sufficiently sensitive or specific to distinguish alcoholic from nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis.     

Trypsin activity

A normal serum amylase level is found in up to 32% of patients with acute alcoholic pancreatitis. This underlines the need for more sensitive diagnostic tests in this frequent cause of pancreatitis. Animal and human studies have shown that chronic alcohol consumption leads to important modifications in trypsinogen metabolism. The present work has prospectively analyzed admission serum trypsin activity with a new biochemical test and usual markers such as amylase, lipase, and immunoreactive trypsin in 32 attacks of acute pancreatitis. Seventeen were due to alcohol and 15 to other causes, including 11 with gallstone pancreatitis. High trypsin activity (median: 235 units/liter; range: 165–853) was found in all patients with acute alcoholic pancreatitis even when the amylase level was normal on admission (3/17: 18%). Trypsin activity did not differ between nonalcoholic pancreatitis (N=15): 84 units/liter (42–98), alcoholic controls (N=15): 77 units/liter (40–122), and healthy controls (N=62): 81 units/liter (15–143). The difference was not related to the severity of disease or circulating α₂-macroglobulin, α₁-protease inhibitor, or immunoreactive trypsinogen levels. Lipase/amylase ratio was less discriminant than trypsin activity between alcoholic and nonalcoholic diseases. We conclude that serum trypsin activity seems specific to acute alcoholic pancreatitis and should be included in new prospective studies assessing biochemical testing of alcohol-related pancreatic diseases.     

Validity of serum amylase and lipase in the differential diagnosis between acute/acutized chronic pancreatitis and other causes of acute abdominal pain

BACKGROUND: Raised serum amylase and lipase levels are observed in several abdominal diseases. AIM: Assessing the validity of serum amylase and lipase for the differential diagnosis between acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis, biliary tract disease, perforated gastroduodenal ulcer and acute appendicitis. PATIENTS E METHODS: Prospective study including 134 individuals: 38 with acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis, 35 with biliary tract disease, 17 with perforated gastroduodenal ulcer and 44 with acute appendicitis, mean age (standard deviation) of 42.4 +/- 17.7, 46.7 +/- 18.3, 47.8 +/- 12 and 33.7 +/- 17.8 years, respectively. Serum amylase and lipase were determined at admission to the emergency department. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis, when the cutt-off levels of serum amylase were set at the upper normal range level or up to 5-fold as high, the sensitivity decreased from 92% to 74%, the specificity increased from 85% to 99%, the positive predictive value increased from 71% to 97%, and the negative predictive value decreased from 96% to 91%. For serum lipase levels similar figures were obtained for sensitivity and negative predictive value, but the specificity and positive predictive value were lower. When the combination of raised serum amylase or lipase were analyzed, a minor increase was observed in sensitivity and negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: For the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis: 1) the best cut-off level for both tests was 2-times the upper normal range; 2) the sensitivities of serum amylase and lipase were similar; 3) the specificity and positive predictive value of serum amylase were slightly higher than observed for serum lipase; 4) the sensitivity but not the specificity increased when at least one between amylase or lipase was raised.     

Serum lipase: a better test to diagnose acute alcoholic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum lipase is a better test than serum amylase to diagnose acute alcoholic pancreatitis. PATIENTS: Two hundred two asymptomatic chronic alcoholics (Group A) and 29 patients with image-proven pancreatitis (Group P). MEASUREMENTS: Serum lipase was measured using the Kodak Ektachem clinical chemistry slide. Serum amylase was estimated using the Kodak Ektachem clinical chemistry slide or the Beckman Astra amylase chemistry module. RESULTS: The level of serum amylase in Group A ranged from 17 to 347 U/L (mean 71, SD +/- 36 U/L) and in Group P from 180 to 2,985 U/L (mean 722, SD +/- 663 U/L). Thirteen of 29 patients (45%) with image-proven pancreatitis had levels that overlapped those found in asymptomatic alcoholics. The serum lipase levels in Group A ranged from 34 to 600 U/L (mean 186, SD +/- 111 U/L), while in Group P, the corresponding figures were 1,011 to 25,706 U/L (mean 5,822, SD +/- 5,664 U/L). None of the 29 patients with image-proven pancreatitis had levels that overlapped those found in asymptomatic alcoholics. CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipase is a better test that serum amylase to diagnose acute alcoholic pancreatitis.     

Comparison of serum amylase pancreatic isoamylase and lipase in patients with hyperamylasemia

We compared results of measurements of total serum amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, and lipase measurements in patients with hyperamylasemia. Serial measurements of these three enzyme levels in patients recovering from acute pancreatitis indicated that pancreatic isoamylase and lipase were elevated above normal to a greater extent and remained elevated much longer than did the total amylase. This finding indicates an appreciable sensitivity advantage of the pancreatic isoamylase and lipase over total amylase measurement during the recovery phase of pancreatitis. Comparison of pancreatic isoamylase and lipase levels in selected sera indicated a good correlation (r=0.84) between these two measurements in patients who did not have macroamylasemia. Lipase was normal in sera with amylase elevations due solely to salivary isoamylase. Thus, in nonmacroamylsemic sera, pancreatic isoamylase and lipase appear to be roughly interchangeable markers of the level of pancreatic enzymes in the blood. An advantage of the lipase assay is that this enzyme is normal in hyperamylasemia caused by macroamylasemia, whereas the inhibitor assay indicates that the pancreatic isoamylase is elevated. Development of automated assays for either pancreatic isoamylase or lipase should lead to the routine use of one of these assays in place of the present reliance on total amylase measurements in the diagnosis of pancreatitis.Supported by Veterans Administration Research Funds and National Institutes of Health grant 13309-15.     

Fecal elastase 1, serum amylase and lipase levels in children with cholestasis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The pancreatic functions of children with cholestatic liver diseases were unclear. Due to anatomic vicinity and common ontogenic origin, hepatobiliary disorders of infancy may also affect pancreatic function. The aim of the study was to evaluate the exocrine pancreatic function and common pancreatic function tests in children with cholestatic disorders. METHODS: In 40 children with cholestasis, fecal elastase 1 (FE1) concentrations were measured. Serum amylase and lipase values were tested. The diagnoses included 32 patients with extrahepatic cholestasis (biliary atresia (BA) and choledochal cyst), and 8 patients with intrahepatic cholestasis (progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis and Alagille syndrome). None had renal insufficiency or clinical symptoms/signs of acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: All the patients had normal FE1 (>200 microg/g). Nineteen percent (7/37) had elevated serum amylase levels (>100 U/l). Thirty-two percent (12/37) had elevated serum lipase levels above the normal (>120 U/l). Seventy-three percent (8/11) of BA patients with bilirubin >2 mg/dl had elevated serum lipase levels compared to 18% (3/17) with bilirubin < or = 2 mg/dl (p = 0.0036). None had detectable pancreatic abnormality on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance images. CONCLUSIONS: None of the cholestatic children in this study had exocrine pancreatic insufficiency as detected by FE1. Hyperamylasemia and/or hyperlipasemia were frequently found. In children with BA, those with impaired biliary excretion tended to have elevated serum pancreatic enzymes as compared with those who had no jaundice. A decreased hepatic metabolism may be the cause.     

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor administration must be monitored for serum amylase and lipase in order to prevent an acute pancreatitis: a case report

Some clinical cases published in literature show that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor administration may cause acute pancreatitis. In this work, the authors report a case of a patient affected by hypertension. Upon admission, the authors started antihypertensive therapy using captopril, which caused an important amylase and lipase rise within 13 days. When the ACE-inhibitor therapy was stopped, a rapid decrease of the serum enzyme was observed within 3 days. The high levels of serum amylase and lipase were linked to neutrophilia but were not associated with relevant symptomatic findings or features of pancreatopathy. The absence of the usual conditions that may cause pancreatitis, such as biliary stasis, hypercalcemia, or alcohol abuse, and the rapid decrease of serum enzyme levels after drug suspension suggested an ACE-inhibitor-induced pancreatitis. This is the first clinical report of an ACE-inhibitor-induced pancreatitis in which captopril administration was found after hospitalization. The drug suspension probably prevented other complications. This case report suggests that, when ACE-inhibitor administration is started, serum amylase and lipase should be monitored in order to prevent acute pancreatitis without waiting for clinical evidence of a pancreatopathy.     

Underestimation of acute pancreatitis: patients with only a small increase in amylase/lipase levels can also have or develop severe acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: In most treatment studies on acute pancreatitis, pancreatologists base their diagnosis on amylase/lipase levels more than three times above the upper limit of normal (>3n) and thus exclude patients with smaller enzyme level increases. The recommendations derived from the results of treatment studies do not take into account such patients. Non-pancreatologists frequently believe that only patients with high enzyme levels have a serious prognosis. AIMS: To question the assumption that high enzyme levels indicate severe, and conversely low enzyme levels indicate mild, acute pancreatitis. PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective study includes 284 consecutive patients with a first attack of acute pancreatitis. The cause was biliary in 114 (40%) patients, alcoholism in 83 (29%), other in 21 (7%), and unknown in 66 (23%). Patients were divided into two groups according to their serum enzyme levels (amylase: 3n, n = 196; lipase: 3n, n = 233). Renal impairment, indication for dialysis and artificial ventilation, development of pseudocysts, necessity for surgery, and mortality were taken as parameters of severity. RESULTS: The incidence of severity was the same for both the 3n groups. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of acute pancreatitis is independent of the elevation in serum amylase/lipase level (3n) on admission. Patients with only a slight increase can also have or develop severe acute pancreatitis. Patients with 相似文献   

Serum amylase, isoamylase, and lipase in the acute abdomen. Their diagnostic value for acute pancreatitis

We evaluated the diagnostic value of serum amylase, isoamylase, and lipase for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis from sera of patients with acute abdominal pain. Comparison was first made in condition A between 32 patients with image-proven pancreatitis and 414 patients with nonpancreatic acute abdomen (the control group), then in condition B, between 62 pancreatitis patients with or without image proof and the control group. We found (a) that patients with image-proven pancreatitis suffer a more severe clinical course than those without; (b) that the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy in condition B are higher than in condition A at any cutoff level; (c) that none of the enzyme assays is specific at the upper reference limit, but their diagnostic yields are much improved by raising cutoff levels to about three or four times the upper limit; and (d) that at these selected cutoff levels, amylase had a diagnostic value similar to p-isoamylase or lipase in both conditions (sensitivity 84% and 92% for amylase in conditions A and B, respectively; specificity 98% and 98%; positive predictive value 75% and 90%; negative predictive value 99% and 99%; accuracy 91% and 97%). In conclusion, at an appropriately selected cutoff level, amylase can be effectively used as the first-line test and isoamylase or lipase as adjunct tests for acute abdominal conditions.     

The hourly rate of urinary amylase excretion, serum amylase, and serum lipase: Part II Patients with gastrointestinal and pancreatic disorders

Gastrointestinal disease other than hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders was associated with hourly rates of urinary amylase excretion above the limits of normal for control subjects (88 IU/hour compared with 69 IU/hour). In hepatobiliary disease, excretion rates of more than 88 but usually less than 190 IU/hour were sometimes found. Whilst rates of urinary amylase excretion were not helpful in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis or carcinoma of the pancreas, levels above 190 IU/hour were found in acute pancreatitis at a time when the serum levels were also diagnostic. After the acute episode the rate of urinary amylase excretion was moderately elevated for up to six days but did not reach diagnostic levels. Persistent elevation of serum amylase and lipase levels and hourly rates of urinary amylase excretion for more than six days suggested that a pseudocyst had developed. In acute pancreatitis the level of serum lipase was more frequently raised and persisted so for longer than either the serum or urinary amylase.Although the hourly rate of urinary amylase excretion is of little value alone, when performed in conjunction with evaluating the serum amylase and lipase it may provide useful additional evidence of pancreatic disease and it could be useful in the diagnosis of relapsing chronic pancreatitis.     

Serum lipase levels in chronic alcoholics.

Using an elevated serum amylase level to diagnose acute pancreatitis in an alcoholic patient with abdominal pain may not be appropriate, because hyperamylesemia is common in asymptomatic alcoholics without acute pancreatitis. To determine whether serum lipase also suffers from the same drawback, we undertook a prospective study involving 202 asymptomatic alcoholics admitted to the detoxification unit of our hospital. Sixty-six of the 202 patients had serum lipase levels above the normal range (0-213 U/L). Of these 66, 55 (83%) had levels that were one to two times normal, while 11 patients had levels ranging between two and three times normal. No patient exceeded three times the normal level. This background information is important in the interpretation of serum lipase levels in alcoholic patients with abdominal pain.     

135例慢性胰腺炎临床病例分析

探讨慢性胰腺炎的不同病因和临床表现特点。回顾性分析本院135例慢性胰腺炎的住院患者的主要病因包括胆道系统疾病(31．85％)和酒精中毒(35．56％),其他病因包括特发性、自身免疫性疾病、外伤或遗传等。酒精性CP临床症状发生的比例较胆源性高,特别是腹痛、腹泻、糖尿病的发生率明显高于胆源性CP。酒精性与非酒精性CP组、对照组相比,TG、HDL-C、G／HDL-C差别显著。胆道系统疾病和酒精中毒为CP主要病因,近年来酒精性因素呈上升趋势。临床表现上,酒精性较胆源性CP的发生率高。TG／HDL-C比值可能有助于鉴别酒精性和非酒精性胰腺炎。     

Use of amylase isoenzymes in laboratory evaluation of hyperamylasemia

Amylase isoenzyme analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis and lipase concentration by radioimmunoassay were performed in 98 consecutive hyperamylasemic patients. Total pancreatic (P-type) isoamylase was elevated in 89% of patients with clinical evidence of pancreatitis, and in only 11% of those without pancreatitis. Of 43 patients in whom the clinical diagnosis was obscure, 44% demonstrated an increase in pancreatic amylase and three (7%) had an increase in salivary (S-type) amylase. Lipase concentration by radioimmunoassay correlated well with lipase activity (r=+0.69,P<0.05) and was as effective as amylase isoenzymes in distinguishing patients felt likely to have pancreatitis from those who were unlikely. Amylase isoenzymes or serum lipase concentration may be useful tests in the laboratory evaluation of hyperamylasemia when the etiology is obscure.Supported by a grant from the Office of Consolidated Laboratory Services, Rush Medical Center.     

Prevalence of normal serum amylase levels in patients with acute alcoholic pancreatitis

Acute alcoholic pancreatitis is uncommonly diagnosed when the serum amylase level is normal. We defined acute alcoholic pancreatitis as a clinical syndrome in which hyperamylasemia was not a necessary component and sought support for the diagnosis by ultrasonography and computed tomography of the pancreas. In 68 episodes of acute alcoholic pancreatitis identified in a one-year period, the serum amylase level was normal at the time of hospital admission in 32%. In 40 episodes, we performed ultrasonography and computed tomography within 48 hr of admission. The diagnosis was supported by ultrasonography in 43%, by computed tomography in 68%. Ultrasonography and computed tomography supported the diagnosis as frequently in patients with normal serum amylase levels as in patients with hyperamylasemia. We conclude that patients with acute alcoholic pancreatitis frequently have normal serum amylase levels. The widespread clinical practice of relying solely on hyperamylasemia to establish the diagnosis of acute alcoholic pancreatitis is unjustified and should be abandoned.     

Radioimmunoassay for human pancreatic lipase in acute pancreatitis

We examined the utility of serum pancreatic lipase by radioimmunoassay as a diagnostic test for acute pancreatitis and its correlation with serum total amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, and lipase activity. Data were analyzed on 11 patients with documented acute pancreatitis, three groups of patients (N = 104) with nongastrointestinal, gastrointestinal, and renal diseases, and 30 healthy controls. Patients with acute pancreatitis had significantly (P less than 0.01) higher mean serum lipase by radioimmunoassay than all other groups. Using a serum lipase of 112 ng/ml as a cutoff point in all patients, the test was 91% sensitive and 96% specific for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The correlation coefficients of serum lipase by radioimmunoassay with respect to total amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, and lipase activity were 0.86, 0.98, and 0.79, respectively.