Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: towards standardization of platelet factor 4/heparin antigen tests

Summary. Background: Laboratory confirmation of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on detection of heparin‐dependent platelet‐activating antibodies. Platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin enzyme‐immunoassays (EIA) are a widely available surrogate for platelet‐activating antibodies. Objective: Defining the optical density (OD) reactivity profiles of a PF4/heparin EIA in reference subject and patient populations and the correlation of the EIA results (expressed in OD units) with the prevalence of platelet‐activating antibodies. Patients/methods: Using quantile regression we determined the 97.5th percentile of PF4/heparin‐immunoglobulin G (IgG) EIA reactivities in non‐heparin‐treated individuals [blood donors (n = 935)] and patients before heparin therapy (n = 1207). In patients with suspected HIT, we compared the correlation of EIA‐IgG reactivities (Greifswald laboratory; n = 2821) and the heparin‐induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) with the correlation of reactivities of another EIA‐IgG (McMaster laboratory; n = 1956) with the serotonin‐release assay (SRA). Results: PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD reactivities had a lower OD 97.5th percentile in blood donors compared with patient groups before heparin treatment (P < 0.001). The percentage of sera testing positive in the functional assays strongly correlated with PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD reactivities in both laboratories with very similar results (correlation coefficient > 0.9) when normalized OD ranges (maximum OD divided by 10) were used instead of absolute OD values. Conclusions: Results of PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA should not be reported as only positive or negative as there is no single acceptable cut‐off value. Instead, reporting PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD results in ranges allows for risk‐stratified prediction for presence of platelet‐activating antibodies. Use of normalized OD ranges permits a standardized approach for inter‐laboratory comparisons.     

Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Summary

Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (aHIT) indicates the presence in patients of anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–polyanion antibodies that are able to activate platelets strongly even in the absence of heparin (heparin‐independent platelet activation). Nevertheless, as seen with serum obtained from patients with otherwise typical heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), serum‐induced platelet activation is inhibited at high heparin concentrations (10–100 IU mL^?1 heparin). Furthermore, upon serial dilution, aHIT serum will usually show heparin‐dependent platelet activation. Clinical syndromes associated with aHIT include: delayed‐onset HIT, persisting HIT, spontaneous HIT syndrome, fondaparinux‐associated HIT, heparin ‘flush’‐induced HIT, and severe HIT (platelet count of < 20 × 10⁹ L^?1) with associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Recent studies have implicated anti‐PF4 antibodies that are able to bridge two PF4 tetramers even in the absence of heparin, probably facilitated by non‐heparin platelet‐associated polyanions (chondroitin sulfate and polyphosphates); nascent PF4–aHIT‐IgG complexes recruit additional heparin‐dependent HIT antibodies, leading to the formation of large multimolecular immune complexes and marked platelet activation. aHIT can persist for several weeks, and serial fibrin, D‐dimer, and fibrinogen levels, rather than the platelet count, may be helpful for monitoring treatment response. Although standard anticoagulant therapy for HIT ought to be effective, published experience indicates frequent failure of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)‐adjusted anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin), probably because of underdosing in the setting of HIT‐associated DIC, known as ‘APTT confounding’. Thus, non‐APTT‐adjusted therapies with drugs such as danaparoid and fondaparinux, or even direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban or apixaban, are suggested therapies, especially for long‐term management of persisting HIT. In addition, emerging data indicate that high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin can interrupt HIT antibody‐induced platelet activation, leading to rapid platelet count recovery.

     

Fondaparinux in acute heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a case series

See also Greinacher A. Immunogenic but effective: the HIT‐fondaparinux brain puzzler. This issue, pp 2386–8; Warkentin TE, Pai M, Sheppard JI, Schulman S, Spyropoulos AC, Eikelboom JW. Fondaparinux treatment of acute heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: confirmed by the serotonin‐release assay: a 30‐month, 16‐patient case series. This issue, pp 2389–96.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia – therapeutic concentrations of danaparoid,unlike fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors,inhibit formation of platelet factor 4–heparin complexes

Summary. Background: Treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a disorder in which anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin antibodies cause platelet activation and hypercoagulability, requires alternative (non‐heparin) anticoagulation. Treatment options include direct thrombin inhibitors [lepirudin and argatroban (approved), and bivalirudin], danaparoid (approved) (mixture of anticoagulant glycosaminoglycans), or fondaparinux (synthetic heparin‐mimicking pentasaccharide). PF4–heparin complexes form at optimal stoichiometric ratios. Objectives: To compare the effects of these various non‐heparin anticoagulants in disrupting the formation of PF4–heparin complexes, and PF4‐containing immune complexes. Patients/methods: Sera were obtained from patients with serologically confirmed HIT. The effects of the alternative anticoagulants on PF4 and PF4–heparin complex interactions with platelets, as well as HIT antibody binding and platelet activation, were investigated. Results: Danaparoid at very low concentrations increased PF4 binding to platelets. In therapeutic concentrations, however, it decreased PF4 binding to platelets (P = 0.0004), displaced PF4–heparin complexes from platelets (P = 0.0033) and PF4 from the surface of a PF4‐transfected HEK‐293 EBNA cell line expressing the PF4 receptor CXCR3‐B (P = 0.0408), reduced PF4–heparin complex size (P = 0.025), inhibited HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes (P = 0.001), and prevented platelet activation by HIT antibodies (P = 0.046). Although fondaparinux also interfered with PF4 binding to platelets, HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes, and activation of platelets by HIT antibodies, these effects occurred only at supratherapeutic concentrations. The direct thrombin inhibitors had no effect at any concentrations. Conclusions: Danaparoid uniquely interferes with the pathogenesis of HIT by disrupting PF4‐containing immune complexes at therapeutic dose concentrations. It is possible that these effects contribute to its therapeutic efficacy.     

Early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia in post-cardiac surgery patients is rarely due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, even when antibody tests are positive

See also Gruel Y, Pouplard C. Post‐operative platelet count profile: the most reliable tool for identifying patients with true heparin‐induced thrombocypenia after cardiac surgery. This issue, pp 27–29. Summary. Background: The high frequency of thrombocytopenia in post‐cardiac surgery patients makes it challenging to diagnose heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two platelet count profiles are reported as indicating possible HIT in these patients: profile 1 describes a platelet count fall that begins between postoperative days 5 and 10, whereas profile 2 denotes early‐onset thrombocytopenia that persists beyond day 5. Objectives: To examine how these platelet count profiles correlate with antibody status and HIT post‐cardiac surgery. Methods: We prospectively screened 581 cardiac surgery patients for heparin‐dependent antibodies by platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin immunoassay and platelet‐activation test, and performed daily platelet counts (until day 10) with 30‐day follow‐up. Results: All three patients with platelet count profile 1 tested positive for platelet‐activating anti‐PF4–heparin IgG antibodies [odds ratio (OR) 521.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–34 000, P = 0.002], and were judged to have HIT. In contrast, none of 25 patients with early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia (profile 2) was judged to have HIT, including five patients testing positive for platelet‐activating anti‐PF4–heparin IgG antibodies. In these patients, the frequency of heparin‐dependent antibodies did not differ from that in non‐thrombocytopenic controls, either for anti‐PF4–heparin IgG (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7–4.1, P = 0.31) or for platelet‐activating antibodies (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.6–5.7, P = 0.20). Multivariate analysis revealed that type of cardiac surgery, but not HIT antibody status, predicted early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia. Together, these findings show that HIT was uncommon in this study population [overall frequency, 3/581 (0.5%), 95% CI 0.1–1.5%]. Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia that begins between 5 and 10 days post‐cardiac surgery is highly predictive for HIT. In contrast, early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia is usually caused by non‐HIT factors with coinciding heparin‐dependent antibody seroconversion.     

Prospective observational evaluation of the particle immunofiltration anti-platelet factor 4 rapid assay in MICU patients with thrombocytopenia

Introduction

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) results from antibodies to PF4/heparin complexes and clinical diagnosis is difficult. We evaluated the particle immunofiltration anti-platelet factor 4 (PIFA) rapid assay, in conjunction with a clinical risk score, in the diagnosis of HIT.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational study in all patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) in a large academic medical center. Patients were screened daily for thrombocytopenia defined as either a platelet count that decreased by at least 33% or an absolute platelet count less than 150,000/μL. Patients with suspected HIT underwent PIFA and ELISA testing for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Available residual frozen sera were sent to a reference laboratory for serotonin release assay (SRA) testing.

Results

During the study period, 340 patients were admitted to the MICU, of which 143 patients met criteria for thrombocytopenia. Forty-three patients had no evidence of recent heparin exposure. PIFA and ELISA testing were performed on 100 patients, of which 92 had samples available for SRA analysis. PIFA results were negative in 62, positive in 28 and inconclusive in 2 patients. The 4Ts score showed low to intermediate risk in 57 of the PIFA negative patients. The ELISA results were negative in 86 and positive in 6 patients. SRA testing identified 3 patients with a positive SRA test and 89 patients with a negative result. All patients with a negative PIFA result also had a negative SRA result. In the one patient deemed to have clinical HIT, the pretest probability was high (4Ts score of 6) and the anti-PF4/heparin antibody testing revealed a positive SRA, inconclusive PIFA and a negative ELISA result.

Conclusions

While thrombocytopenia in our population is common, the prevalence of HIT is low. The combination of a low to intermediate pretest probability with a negative PIFA test can rapidly exclude the presence of platelet activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and, therefore, HIT as the cause of the thrombocytopenia. Since a positive PIFA result has a low positive predictive value, a positive PIFA is not diagnostic of HIT and additional evaluation is warranted.     

Fondaparinux for thromboembolic treatment and prophylaxis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To review literature evaluating the use of fondaparinux for thromboembolic treatment and prophylaxis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-February 2006) was conducted using the search terms fondaparinux, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and thrombocytopenia to identify English-language articles. Additional sources were identified from bibliographies of select articles and the manufacturer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fondaparinux, a pentasaccharide that selectively inhibits factor Xa, has been reported to have negligible or no cross-reactivity in vitro with HIT antibodies. Thromboembolic treatment and prophylaxis with fondaparinux in patients with HIT has been described. Three cases reported patients who were successfully treated for thromboembolic events with fondaparinux after developing HIT during therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Another report showed positive outcomes using fondaparinux for prophylaxis in a patient who had previously developed HIT after receiving UFH. Moreover, 2 case series, one using fondaparinux for prophylaxis in patients with a previous diagnosis of HIT and the other using fondaparinux for treatment in patients who developed HIT while receiving UFH or LMWH, reported normal platelet counts during fondaparinux treatment. Finally, results of a retrospective review demonstrated that fondaparinux prevented thromboembolic events or recurrent thrombocytopenia in patients with a prior HIT diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Limited data support the use of fondaparinux for thromboembolic treatment or prophylaxis in patients with antibody assay-confirmed HIT who do not have a contraindication for fondaparinux use. Randomized controlled trials have not been published; therefore, questions remain regarding efficacy, safety, optimal doses, treatment duration, and incidence of thromboembolic events when fondaparinux is used in this setting. Prospective trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in this patient population need to be conducted to answer these questions.     

Heparin‐induced non‐necrotizing skin lesions: rarely associated with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

See also Warkentin TE, Linkins L‐A. Non‐necrotizing heparin‐induced skin lesions and the 4T’s score. This issue, pp 1483–. Summary. Background: Recently, there has been an increasing number of reports regarding adverse skin reactions to subcutaneous heparin administration. Case series have implied that heparin‐induced skin lesions are predominantly associated with life‐threatening heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in at least 22% of patients. Skin lesions, therefore, have been included in clinical scores for HIT. Objectives: To determine the association of heparin‐induced skin lesions with HIT. This would have a pivotal impact on further anticoagulatory management in patients with heparin‐induced skin lesions. Patients/Methods: In our observational cohort study, 87 consecutive patients with heparin‐induced skin lesions (85 occurring during low‐molecular‐weight heparin administration) were evaluated using a standardized internal protocol, including HIT diagnostics (heparin‐platelet factor 4‐ELISA, heparin‐induced platelet activation assay), platelet count monitoring, clinical/sonographical screening for thrombosis, skin allergy testing and, if necessary, histology. Results: None of the observed heparin‐induced skin lesions was due to HIT; all lesions were caused by delayed‐type IV‐hypersensitivity reactions (DTH) instead. Even the cutaneous reaction in one patient with concomitant HIT could be classified histologically as DTH reaction, amounting to an association of heparin‐induced skin lesions and HIT in 1.2% (1/87; 95% confidence interval, 0.00–0.06). Conclusion: Heparin‐induced skin lesions associated with use of low‐molecular‐weight heparins do not seem to be strongly associated with a systemic immunologic reaction in terms of HIT and might rather be due to DTH reactions than due to microvascular thrombosis. Hence, we propose refining existing pretest probability scores for HIT, unless underlying causes have been clarified.     

Immunogenic but effective: the HIT‐fondaparinux brain puzzler

See also Warkentin TE, Pai M, Sheppard JI, Schulman S, Spyropoulos AC, Eikelboom JW. Fondaparinux treatment of acute heparininduced thrombocytopenia confirmed by the serotonin‐release assay: a 30‐month, 16‐patient case series. This issue, pp 2389–96; Goldfarb MJ, Blostein MD. Fondaparinux in acute heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a case series. This issue, pp 2501–3.     

Binding of heparin‐dependent antibodies to PF4 modified by enoxaparin oligosaccharides: evaluation by surface plasmon resonance and serotonin release assay

Summary. Background: The minimal structural requirements of low‐molecular‐weight heparins that determine the risk of developing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are not fully defined.Objectives: The ability of enoxaparin‐derived oligosaccharides (OS) to induce platelet activation and exposure of platelet‐factor 4 (PF4) epitopes recognized by antibodies developed in HIT was studied by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and serotonin release assay.Results: Decasaccharides with ≥ 11 sulfate groups induced platelet activation in the presence of plasma from patients with confirmed HIT. Serotonin release of > 80% without full inhibition at 100 μg mL^?1 was achieved with decasaccharides containing 14 or 15 sulfate groups, 2 dodecasaccharides and 2 tetradecasaccharides. An SPR method was developed using purified PF4 immobilized on carboxymethylated dextran. Antibodies from all HIT samples bound to PF4/heparin in SPR assays with resonance units (RU) ratio of 109–173 with HIT plasma vs. 88–93 with control plasma. RU ratios > 100 were measured when PF4 was pre‐incubated with OS with ≥ 10 saccharide units and one octasaccharide containing 10 sulfate groups. RU ratios > 140, similar to those measured when PF4 was pre‐incubated with unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin, were obtained with purified dodeca‐ and tetradecasaccharides. RU values strongly correlated with the number of sulfate groups in the decasaccharides tested (r = 0.93, P = 0.02).Conclusions: LMWHs with fragments > 10 saccharides and a large number of sulfate groups are more likely to be associated with a higher risk of HIT. These structure‐activity relationships were independent of the ability of the OS to bind antithrombin.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia complicating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Review of the literature and alternative anticoagulants

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life‐threatening prothrombotic, immune‐mediated complication of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin therapy. HIT is characterized by moderate thrombocytopenia 5‐10 days after initial heparin exposure, detection of platelet‐activating anti‐platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of mechanical circulatory support used in critically ill patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. Systemic anticoagulation is used to alleviate the thrombotic complications that may occur when blood is exposed to artificial surfaces within the ECMO circuit. Therefore, when HIT complicates patients on ECMO support, it is associated with a high thrombotic morbidity and mortality. The risk for HIT correlates with the accumulative dosage of heparin exposure. In ECMO patients receiving continuous infusion of heparin for circuit patency, the risk for HIT is not neglected and must be thought of in the differential diagnosis of the appropriate clinical and laboratory circumstances. The following article reviews the current knowledge in HIT complicating ECMO patients and the alternative anticoagulation options in the presence of HIT.     

The Syk‐kinase inhibitor R406 impairs platelet activation and monocyte tissue factor expression triggered by heparin‐PF4 complex directed antibodies

Summary. Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but severe complication of heparin therapy in which immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the platelet factor 4–heparin complex activate platelets through the FcγRIIA receptor. Clustering of FcγRIIA initiates signaling cascades involving tyrosine kinases including the spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk). Moreover, besides the critical role of platelets, the expression of tissue factor (TF) by human monocytes triggered by HIT antibodies has been shown to contribute to the hypercoagulability and the thrombotic complications in HIT patients. Objectives: We investigated the effect of R406, a small molecule inhibitor of Syk developed as a potential treatment of autoimmune diseases, allergic disorders and B‐cell related hematological malignancies, on FcγRIIA‐mediated platelet activation. To further assess the potential activity of Syk inhibitors in HIT treatment, the effect of R406 was also evaluated on HIT antibodies‐induced expression of TF and procoagulant activity of monocytic cells. Results: We show that R406 is a potent inhibitor of platelet signaling and functions initiated by FcγRIIA cross‐linking by specific antibodies or by sera from HIT patients. Syk inhibition efficiently prevents FcγRIIA‐induced LAT phosphorylation and activation of phosphoinositide 3‐kinase, Akt, phospholipase Cγ2 and p38 MAP‐kinase. As a consequence, FcγRIIA‐induced platelet aggregation, granule secretion and microparticles production are strongly inhibited by R406. Moreover, the Syk inhibitor efficiently impairs the expression of TF and the procoagulant activity of human monocytes triggered by HIT antibodies. Conclusion: Syk inhibitors may be of therapeutic interest in the treatment of HIT by reducing HIT antibodies‐mediated platelet activation and monocyte procoagulant activity.     

Activation of platelets by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies in the serotonin release assay is not dependent on the presence of heparin

The serotonin release assay (SRA) tests for antibodies responsible for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). By definition, SRA-positive antibodies cause platelet serotonin release in vitro, in the presence of low concentrations of heparin, but not with excess heparin. Many SRA-positive sera activate platelets in the presence of saline without drug, either as a result of residual heparin in the specimen, or because of intrinsic features of the HIT antibodies. The present experiments show that neither exhaustive heparinase treatment, nor chromatographic removal of heparin abrogates the spontaneous platelet activation caused by these HIT antibodies. This is the first study to systematically demonstrate that in vitro activity of HIT antibodies can be independent of heparin. In addition, T-gel chromatography demonstrated differences among fractions of enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-positive HIT antibodies within individual specimens. Certain ELISA-positive fractions had SRA activity while others did not, and the SRA activity was not proportional to HIT antibody ELISA titer. These data suggest that antibodies formed as a result of heparin treatment are heterogeneous, and that some can contribute to the pathogenesis of HIT even when heparin is no longer present.     

The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) Score: a novel pre‐test probability model for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia based on broad expert opinion

Summary. Background: The diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging. Over‐diagnosis and over‐treatment are common. Objectives: To develop a pre‐test clinical scoring model for HIT based on broad expert opinion that may be useful in guiding clinical decisions regarding therapy. Patients/methods: A pre‐test model, the HIT Expert Probability (HEP) Score, was constructed based on the opinions of 26 HIT experts. Fifty patients referred to a reference laboratory for HIT testing comprised the validation cohort. Two hematology trainees scored each patient using the HEP Score and a previously published clinical scoring system (4 T’s). A panel of three independent experts adjudicated the 50 patients and rendered a diagnosis of HIT likely or unlikely. All subjects underwent HIT laboratory testing with a polyspecific HIT ELISA and serotonin release assay (SRA). Results: The HEP Score exhibited significantly greater interobserver agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.93) vs. 0.71 (0.54–0.83)], correlation with the results of HIT laboratory testing and concordance with the diagnosis of the expert panel (area under receiver‐operating curve: 0.91 vs. 0.74, P = 0.017) than the 4 T’s. The model was 100% sensitive and 60% specific for determining the presence of HIT as defined by the expert panel and would have allowed for a 41% reduction in the number of patients receiving a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). Conclusion: The HEP Score is the first pre‐test clinical scoring model for HIT based on broad expert opinion, exhibited favorable operating characteristics and may permit clinicians to confidently reduce use of alternative anticoagulants. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.     

Platelet transfusions in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a report of four cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin therapy associated with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The diagnosis of HIT is based on clinical criteria and laboratory tests, including the serotonin release assay (SRA). Because HIT patients are thrombocytopenic, platelet (PLT) transfusions may be contemplated; however, many published reviews have concluded that PLT transfusions are contraindicated in HIT because they may precipitate thrombotic events. This study reports four patients with clinically suspected HIT who received PLT transfusions without complications, and the literature regarding this subject has been reviewed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with a SRA ordered for suspected HIT were retrospectively identified. Charts of patients with positive SRAs who received a PLT transfusion when HIT was clinically suspected were reviewed for evidence of PLT transfusion safety and efficacy. A comprehensive search of the published literature regarding PLT transfusions in patients with HIT was conducted. RESULTS: A SRA was performed on 189 patients with suspected HIT. Thirteen patients tested positive and 4 of these received a PLT transfusion. No patient developed a thrombotic complication. All 4 patients had adequate posttransfusion PLT increments. Two of the 3 patients with active bleeding had cessation of bleeding after transfusion. Review of the literature revealed no case of a complication clearly attributable to PLT transfusion. CONCLUSION: Four patients with clinically suspected HIT and a positive SRA were transfused PLTs both efficaciously and safely. These outcomes, combined with the results of the literature review, suggest that PLT transfusions should not be withheld when clinically indicated in patients with HIT.     

Effect of anti-platelet factor-4/heparin antibody induction on early saphenous vein graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass surgery

Summary.  Background : Antibodies to complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) are capable of causing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Recent evidence suggests that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies may be prothrombogenic even in the absence of thrombocytopenia and clinically-recognized HIT. Objectives : To determine if induction of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies is an independent risk factor for early saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion or adverse clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Patients/Methods : Anti-PF4/heparin antibody titers were measured in 368 patients prior to and then 4 days, 6 weeks and 6 months after CABG surgery. Serotonin release assay (SRA) and antibody isotype analysis were also performed on 6-week samples. SVG patency was determined in 297 patients 6 months after surgery by multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography. Results : Six weeks after surgery, 52% of patients were anti-PF4/heparin seropositive and 9% were SRA positive. Six months after surgery, neither the percentage of occluded SVG (19% vs. 20%, P  = NS), the percentage of patients with an occluded SVG (33% vs. 33%, P  = NS) nor the incidence of adverse clinical events (21% vs. 24%, P  = NS) differed between seropositive and seronegative groups. Neither IgG isotype nor SRA positivity was additionally predictive of SVG occlusion or adverse clinical outcome. Conclusion : Induction of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, even those capable of heparin-dependent platelet activation, is not independently associated with early SVG occlusion or adverse clinical outcomes after CABG surgery.     

The costs of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a patient‐based cost of illness analysis

Summary. Background and objectives: Due to the complexity of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), currently available cost analyses are rough estimates. The objectives of this study were quantification of costs involved in HIT and identification of main cost drivers based on a patient‐oriented approach. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HIT (1995–2004, University‐hospital Greifswald, Germany) based on a positive functional assay (HIPA test) were retrieved from the laboratory records and scored (4T‐score) by two medical experts using the patient file. For cost of illness analysis, predefined HIT‐relevant cost parameters (medication costs, prolonged in‐hospital stay, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, laboratory tests, blood transfusions) were retrieved from the patient files. The data were analysed by linear regression estimates with the log of costs and a gamma regression model. Mean length of stay data of non‐HIT patients were obtained from the German Federal Statistical Office, adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities and year of treatment. Hospital costs were provided by the controlling department. Results and conclusions: One hundred and thirty HIT cases with a 4T‐score ≥4 and a positive HIPA test were analyzed. Mean additional costs of a HIT case were 9008 €. The main cost drivers were prolonged in‐hospital stay (70.3%) and costs of alternative anticoagulants (19.7%). HIT was more costly in surgical patients compared with medical patients and in patients with thrombosis. Early start of alternative anticoagulation did not increase HIT costs despite the high medication costs indicating prevention of costly complications. An HIT cost calculator is provided, allowing online calculation of HIT costs based on local cost structures and different currencies.     

Anti‐PF4/heparin antibody formation postorthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis: the role of non‐drug risk factors and evidence for a stoichiometry‐based model of immunization

Summary. Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia is an antibody‐mediated disorder exhibiting variable frequency in different clinical settings. Antibodies recognize PF4/heparin complexes formed at optimal stoichiometric molar ratios. Objective: To identify clinical factors influencing risk of anti‐PF4/heparin immunization. Patients/methods: We performed observational studies and exploratory analyses of the frequency of anti‐PF4/heparin antibody formation in 6324 patients who received enoxaparin or fondaparinux in four randomized controlled trials of postorthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis. Variables included surgery type (knee vs. hip), timing of first anticoagulant dose (pre‐ vs. postsurgery), circumstances of surgery (elective vs. hip fracture), anticoagulant (enoxaparin vs. fondaparinux) and body‐mass index (BMI). We applied a stoichiometry‐based model that predicts immunization risk based on expected differences in PF4/anticoagulant ratios in different settings, and specifically used this model to predict the effect of increasing BMI quartiles upon relative risk (RR) of immunization for fondaparinux vs. enoxaparin. Results: Anti‐PF4/heparin immunization was more frequent after knee vs. hip surgery (particularly for enoxaparin), and when enoxaparin was given post‐ rather than pre‐elective surgery; however, the opposite occurred with hip fracture surgery, that is, antibody formation was more frequent when enoxaparin or fondaparinux was given presurgery. The RR of immunization for fondaparinux vs. enoxaparin decreased significantly for increasing BMI quartiles, an effect predominantly because of increasing immunization with enoxaparin at increasing BMI quartiles. Conclusions: Several non‐drug factors – including type and circumstances of surgery, timing of first anticoagulant dose and BMI – influence risk of anti‐PF4/heparin antibody formation, consistent with a stoichiometry‐based immunization model of PF4 and anticoagulant ratios occurring during the early peri‐operative period.     

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin use is ubiquitous, wherein 1 to 5% of patients exposed to standard unfractionated heparin develop thrombocytopenia due to antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Classic features include onset of thrombocytopenia after 5 to 10 days of ongoing heparin exposure, a 50% fall in the platelet count from baseline, resolution of the thrombocytopenia 5 to 10 days after cessation of heparin and a high risk of thrombosis noted in 30 to 75% of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in terms of every-other-day platelet-count monitoring in patients on standard unfractionated heparin. And those patients developing thrombocytopenia necessitate an accurate, readily accessible diagnostic test for HIT. Diagnosis has been recently facilitated by the development of an enzyme-linked immunsorbent assay (ELISA) test for the heparin–P4 antibody complex, although this test carries a relatively low specificity. Widespread use of the ELISA demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of the antibody in patients exposed to heparin in certain settings, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, wherein a quarter of patients have a positive ELISA of unclear significance. Once HIT is diagnosed, the high risk of thrombosis necessitates empiric anticoagulation with an antithrombin such as argatroban or lepirudin, or the heparinoid danaparoid. Additional agents under further study include the antithrombin bivalirudin and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Future issues in HIT include increasing awareness for HIT, improving the specificity of HIT testing and the development of new anticoagulants for HIT that will enable out-patient management.     

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin use is ubiquitous, wherein 1 to 5% of patients exposed to standard unfractionated heparin develop thrombocytopenia due to antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Classic features include onset of thrombocytopenia after 5 to 10 days of ongoing heparin exposure, a 50% fall in the platelet count from baseline, resolution of the thrombocytopenia 5 to 10 days after cessation of heparin and a high risk of thrombosis noted in 30 to 75% of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in terms of every-other-day platelet-count monitoring in patients on standard unfractionated heparin. And those patients developing thrombocytopenia necessitate an accurate, readily accessible diagnostic test for HIT. Diagnosis has been recently facilitated by the development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for the heparin-P4 antibody complex, although this test carries a relatively low specificity. Widespread use of the ELISA demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of the antibody in patients exposed to heparin in certain settings, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, wherein a quarter of patients have a positive ELISA of unclear significance. Once HIT is diagnosed, the high risk of thrombosis necessitates empiric anticoagulation with an antithrombin such as argatroban or lepirudin, or the heparinoid danaparoid. Additional agents under further study include the antithrombin bivalirudin and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Future issues in HIT include increasing awareness for HIT, improving the specificity of HIT testing and the development of new anticoagulants for HIT that will enable out-patient management.