Concordance Between Mechanical and Electrical Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure Patients: A Function of the Underlying Cardiomyopathy?

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure (HF) symptoms through a reduction of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. Mechanical dyssynchrony is currently estimated by electrical dyssynchrony (QRS duration). It is known that electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony are not well correlated in HF patients. However, there is limited information about whether this relationship might be influenced by the underlying cardiomyopathy.
Methods: Doppler echocardiography was performed in 88 patients presenting with heart failure due to ischemic (n = 42) or nonischemic (n = 46) heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, New York Heart Association class II–IV, regardless of their QRS duration. Interventricular dyssynchrony was assessed by the time interval between preaortic and prepulmonary ejection times. Intraventricular dyssynchrony was ascertained by (1) the delay between the earliest and the latest peak negative longitudinal strain recorded in the basal and mid-segments of the lateral and septal walls (TMinMax) and (2) the standard deviation of time-to-peak in the same segments (SDdys).
Results: The correlation coefficient between QRS duration and mechanical interventricular dyssynchrony was r = 0.47 (P < 0.001) in patients with nonischemic disease and nonsignificant in patients with ischemic disease. Similarly, the correlation coefficient between QRS duration and mechanical intraventricular dyssynchrony was significant in patients with nonischemic disease (r = 0.37, P = 0.01 for TMinMax; r = 0.42, P = 0.003 for SDdys) and nonsignificant in patients with ischemic disease.
Conclusion: The concordance between electrical dyssynchrony assessed by QRS duration and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by myocardial strain is dependent upon the underlying cardiomyopathy. This observation may improve our understanding of the various responses observed in CRT patients.     

Mechanical Dyssynchrony is Similar in Different Patterns of Left Bundle-Branch Block

Background

Left bundle-branch block (LBBB) and the presence of systolic dysfunction are the major indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony on echocardiography can help identify patients responsive to CRT. Left bundle-branch block can have different morphologic patterns.

Objective

To compare the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in different patterns of LBBB in patients with left systolic dysfunction.

Methods

This study assessed 48 patients with ejection fraction (EF) < 40% and LBBB consecutively referred for dyssynchrony analysis. Conventional echocardiography and mechanical dyssynchrony analysis were performed, interventricular and intraventricular, with ten known methods, using M mode, Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging, isolated or combined. The LBBB morphology was categorized according to left electrical axis deviation in the frontal plane and QRS duration > 150 ms.

Results

The patients'' mean age was 60 ± 11 years, 24 were males, and mean EF was 29% ± 7%. Thirty-two had QRS > 150 ms, and 22, an electrical axis between −30° and +90°. Interventricular dyssynchrony was identified in 73% of the patients, while intraventricular dyssynchrony, in 37%-98%. Patients with QRS > 150 ms had larger left atrium and ventricle, and lower EF (p < 0.05). Left electrical axis deviation associated with worse diastolic function and greater atrial diameter. Interventricular and intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (ten methods) was similar in the different LBBB patterns (p = ns).

Conclusion

In the two different electrocardiographic patterns of LBBB analyzed, no difference regarding the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony was observed.     

Left ventricular versus biventricular pacing: a randomized comparative study evaluating mid-term electromechanical and clinical effects

BACKGROUND: Although left ventricular (LV) pacing has been proposed as an alternative to biventricular (BIV) pacing for heart failure (HF) patients, few comparative data are available on the electromechanical effects of these pacing modalities at mid-term follow-up. AIM: To investigate the clinical and echocardiographic effects of LV versus BIV pacing in a mid-term randomized study. METHODS: After implantation of a device with LV/BIV pacing capabilities, 22 patients with chronic HF and left bundle branch block were randomized to LV or BIV pacing. Patients were assessed both preimplantation and after 3 months by clinical examination, ECG and echocardiography with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: At 3 months LV pacing improved clinical parameters, LV ejection fraction (+5%, range 5-8%, P = 0.007) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (-40 ms, range -50 to -15 ms, in septal to lateral delay, P = 0.008) to a similar extent to BIV pacing. A decrease in interventricular mechanical delay (-25 ms, range -40 to -5 ms, P = 0.008) and QRS duration (-28 ms, range -40 to -5 ms, P = 0.008) was observed in BIV, but not in LV patients. CONCLUSION: In this pilot evaluation, LV pacing appeared to be associated with clinical benefits similar to BIV pacing at mid-term follow-up, and this was combined with an improvement in intraventricular dyssynchrony, regardless of variations in interventricular dyssynchrony and QRS duration. Echocardiographic evaluation of intraventricular dyssynchrony seems to be an appropriate method for assessing the chronic response to LV pacing.     

心力衰竭患者QRS波间期与心脏机械收缩功能失同步化的相关性研究

目的评价充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者QRS间期与左右心室间、左心室内不同步运动参数的相关关系。方法 81例CHF患者及26名健康体检者作为对照组纳入本研究。行常规及彩色组织多普勒显像(TDI)检查。以左、右心室问收缩延迟(IVMD)>33ms定义室间不同步运动,以二尖瓣环6位点中任意2点QRS波起始至心室收缩顶峰的间期(TsP)最长延迟>121ms,或6位点TsP的标准差(TsP-SD)>47ms定义左心室内收缩不同步。比较QRS≥120 ms与QRS<120ms的CHF患者室间、室内不同步发生率,分析QRS间期与室间、室内不同步参数的相关关系。结果 CHF患者IVMD较对照组明显延长[(25.7±16.3)ms比(12.8±8.8)ms,P<0.0001],IVMD与QRS间期呈明显正相关(r=0.44,P<0.0001)。CHF伴QRS≥120ms(n=31)者室间不同步发生率明显高于CHF伴QRS<120ms者(n=50)(66.7%比20.9%,P<0.05)。CHF患者TsP最长延迟及TsP-SD较对照组明显延长,TsP最长延迟及TsP-SD与QRS间期呈弱相关。结论 CHF患者室间不同步运动发生率明显高于对照组,ORS间期增宽与室间不同步的关系可能更密切。     

Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony are common in heart failure patients, regardless of QRS duration.

AIMS: The study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of interventricular and intraventricular contractile dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with either normal or prolonged QRS duration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were performed in 158 consecutive patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF<35%); 61 patients had a normal QRS duration (Group 1), 21 patients had left bundle branch block with a QRS duration between 120 and 150 ms (Group 2) and 76 patients had a QRS duration #10878;150 ms (Group 3). Interventricular dyssynchrony (defined by the presence of an interventricular mechanical delay greater than 40 ms) was found in 12.5%, 52.4% and 72% of patients in Group 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p < 0.001). Intraventricular dyssynchrony (defined by the presence of one or more differences greater than 50 ms among regional pre-ejection periods) was observed in 29.5%, 57.1% and 71% of patients in Group 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p < 0.001). No relationship was found between interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of heart failure patients with a slightly prolonged QRS or even with normal conduction may exhibit ventricular dyssynchrony. Both standard echocardiography and TDI are necessary to describe the entire spectrum of mechanical abnormalities due to dyssynchrony.     

Prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular function (a report from the Belgian Multicenter Registry on dyssynchrony)

The present study evaluated the prevalence of mechanical inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). We studied 138 patients with heart failure (age 67+/-11 years; 76% men); 60 patients had preserved LVEF (>40%). Using conventional Doppler echocardiography, an interventricular mechanical delay>or=40 ms was defined as interventricular dyssynchrony. Using pulse-wave tissue Doppler imaging, the time from the beginning of the QRS complex to onset of systolic motion was measured in 4 basal LV segments. A dispersion of >or=60 ms was defined as intraventricular dyssynchrony. The prevalence of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony was lower in patients with preserved LVEF than in those with reduced LVEF (17% vs 41%, p<0.01 for interventricular dyssynchrony, 18% vs 36%, p<0.01 for intraventricular dyssynchrony). However, patients with preserved LVEF and a QRS width>or=120 ms had higher values for the parameters for inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony than patients with a QRS width<120 ms (interventricular mechanical delay 33+/-20 vs 20+/-16 ms, p<0.05; tissue Doppler imaging dispersion 42+/-26 vs 33+/-22 ms, p<0.05). In patients with a QRS width>or=120 ms, the prevalence of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony was comparable for patients with preserved and reduced LVEF (42% vs 55%, p=NS for interventricular dyssynchrony and 45% vs 46%, p=NS for intraventricular dyssynchrony). In conclusion, the prevalence of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony was low (17% and 18%, respectively) in patients with heart failure and preserved LVEF. However, in the presence of a QRS width of >or=120 ms, this prevalence increased to almost 50%, comparable to that for patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF and a QRS width of >or=120 ms.     

Relation between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block: An electro‐ and vectorcardiographic study

Background

Current guidelines select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) mainly on electrocardiographic parameters like QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, among those LBBB patients, heterogeneity in mechanical dyssynchrony occurs and might be a reason for nonresponse to CRT. This study assesses the relation between electrocardiographic characteristics and presence of mechanical dyssynchrony among LBBB patients.

Methods

The study included patients with true LBBB (including mid‐QRS notching) on standard 12‐lead electrocardiograms. Left bundle branch block‐induced mechanical dyssynchrony was assessed by the presence of septal flash on two‐dimensional echocardiography. Previously reported electro‐ and vectorcardiographic dyssynchrony markers were analyzed: global QRS duration (QRSD_LBBB), left ventricular activation time (QRSD_LVAT), time to intrinsicoid deflection (QRSD_ID), and vectorcardiographic QRS areas in the 3D vector loop (QRSA_3D).

Results

The study enrolled 545 LBBB patients. Septal flash (SF) is present in 52% of patients presenting with true LBBB. Patients with SF are more frequent female, have less ischemic heart disease and smaller left ventricular dimensions. In multivariate analysis longer QRSD_LBBB, QRSD_LVAT and larger QRSA_3D were independently associated with SF. Of all parameters, QRSA_3D has the best accuracy to predict SF, although overall accuracy remains moderate (59% sensitivity, 58% specificity). The predictive value of QRSA_3D remained constant in both sexes, irrespective of ischemic heart disease, ejection fraction and even when categorizing for QRSD_LBBB.

Conclusion

In LBBB patients, large QRS areas correlate better with mechanical dyssynchrony compared to wide QRSD intervals. However, the overall accuracy to predict mechanical dyssynchrony by electrocardiographic dyssynchrony markers, even when using complex vectorcardiographic parameters, remains low.

     

Baseline echocardiographic characteristics of heart failure patients enrolled in a large European multicentre trial (CArdiac REsynchronisation Heart Failure study).

AIMS: Information on the prevalence and clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic inter-relationships of mechanical dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction derives mainly from relatively small studies. The CARE-HF trial provides the opportunity to address these issues in a large population of patients with advanced HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CARE-HF trial enrolled patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV HF, with a QRS duration > or =120 ms, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) < or =35% and LV end diastolic diameter > or =30 mm/m (height in m). Patients underwent a thorough echocardiographic evaluation, which included assessment of LV structure, systolic function, mitral inflow pattern, right ventricular (RV) dimensions and function, and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) as an index of interventricular dyssynchrony. Echocardiographic measurements were made in a Core Laboratory to ensure consistent quantitative analysis. Of the 813 patients enrolled, 735 had a baseline echocardiographic examination suitable for measurement. Overall patients had advanced LV dysfunction (mean EF 25.5%) but few had a restrictive mitral filling pattern (18%) and both the mean RV diameter and RV function were within normal limits. Interventricular dyssynchrony defined as IVMD >40 ms was present in 455 patients (62%). Clinical, electrocardiographic and standard echocardiographic variables were only loosely associated with IVMD. CONCLUSIONS: Interventricular dyssynchrony appears to be an independent characteristic of patients with advanced HF, and is poorly related to clinical, electrocardiographic or standard echocardiographic variable.     

Correlation of Mechanical Dyssynchrony with QRS Duration Measured by Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiography

Background: Preimplantation left ventricular dyssynchrony is considered a prerequisite for a beneficial response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, electrical dyssynchrony estimated by QRS duration (QRSd) on ECG has not been proven to be an optimal surrogate of mechanical dyssynchrony. We evaluated the correlation of mechanical dyssynchrony with QRSd as measured by signal‐averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) in comparison with measurements based on conventional surface ECG and with onscreen measurements based on digital ECG. Methods: We included 49 consecutive patients with decompensated heart failure (40 men, aged 66.8 ± 9.5 years), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV, and LVEF ≤ 40%. QRSd was calculated by manual measurement of 12‐lead ECG, on‐screen measurement of computer‐based ECG, and calculation of total ventricular activation time on SAECG. Results: Only 60.4% of the studied patients had QRS ≥ 120 ms based on measurements derived by SAECG compared to 69.4% by using on‐screen measurement of computer‐based ECG and 73.5% based on surface ECG (P = 0.041). Interventricular but not intraventricular delay was correlated with QRSd. The correlation of interventricular dyssynchrony with QRSd was stronger when measured by SAECG than by surface ECG (r = 0.45, P = 0.001 vs r = 0.35, P < 0.01). Among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, no significant correlation was demonstrated between mechanical dyssynchrony and QRSd. In nonischemic patients, interventricular delay was significantly correlated with QRSd measured by surface ECG (r = 0.45, P < 0.05) and SAECG (r = 0.46, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of SAECG results in different patient classification in wide QRS complex category as compared to surface ECG. Furthermore, QRSd measured by SAECG is correlated with interventricular but not intraventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure patients.     

Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prognostic study with fourier phase analysis of radionuclide angioscintigraphy

OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the prognostic value of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing is an emerging treatment for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular dyssynchrony. The prognostic values of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony have not been previously compared. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with IDC were studied. Left bundle branch block was present in 25% of patients. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography was performed and Fourier phase analyses were examined in both ventricles. Difference between the mean phase of left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) assessed interventricular dyssynchrony, and standard deviations (SDs) of the mean phase in each ventricle assessed intraventricular dyssynchrony. RESULTS: The QRS duration was related to both interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony. A degradation of the hemodynamic status was associated with an increase in intraventricular dyssynchrony but not in interventricular dyssynchrony. With a follow-up of 27 +/- 23 months, 18 patients had a major cardiac event (7 cardiac deaths; 11 worsening, leading to heart transplantation). The SDs of the LV and RV mean phase and QRS duration were predictors of cardiac event (all p < 0.0001), but interventricular dyssynchrony was not. Among 13 univariate predictors of cardiac event, the only independent predictors were an increased SD of LV mean phase (p = 0.0004) and an increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Intraventricular dyssynchrony evaluated with phase analysis of radionuclide angiography is an independent predictor of cardiac event in IDC. The prognosis is related to intraventricular rather than to interventricular dyssynchrony in IDC.     

Myocardial systolic activation delay in patients with left bundle branch block and either normal or impaired left ventricular function

AIM OF THE STUDY: to evaluate determinants of myocardial activation delay of both left (LV) and right (RV) ventricle in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and either normal or impaired LV ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: From an initial cohort of patients with LBBB, 42 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (group A) and 33 with normal global LV systolic function (group B), all comparable in age and sex, underwent standard Doppler echo, pulsed Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI), and coronary angiography. Using DMI, the following regional parameters were evaluated in five different basal myocardial segments (LV anterior, inferior, septal, lateral walls-RV lateral wall): systolic (Sm), early- and late-diastolic (Em and Am) peak velocities. As index of myocardial systolic activation was calculated: precontraction time (PCTm) (from the beginning of Q-wave of ECG to the onset of Sm). Intraventricular systolic dyssynchrony was analyzed by difference of PCTm in different LV myocardial segments. Interventricular activation delay was calculated by the difference of PCTm between the most delayed LV segment and RV lateral wall. RESULTS: Patients of group A showed increased heart rate (HR), QRS duration and LV end-diastolic diameter, and reduced LV EF. By DMI, patients of group A showed reduced myocardial peak velocities and a significant intraventricular delay in activation of LV lateral wall, with increased regional PCTm (P < 0.001). In addition, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy showed a more pronounced interventricular dyssynchrony, even after adjustment for HR and QRS duration. By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a cut-off value of 55 msec of interventricular delay showed 86% sensitivity and 92% specificity in identifying patients with impaired EF. In the overall population, by use of stepwise forward multivariate linear regression analyses, LV end-diastolic diameter (beta coefficient = 0.52; P < 0.001) and LV EF (beta coefficient =-0.58; P < 0.0001) were the only independent determinants of interventricular activation delay. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed DMI is an effective noninvasive technique for assessing the severity of regional delay in activation of LV walls in patients with LBBB. The impairment of interventricular systolic sychronicity is strongly related to LV dilatation and to the degree of global systolic dysfunction. Therefore, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy suitable for cardiac resynchronization therapy may be better selected.     

Filtered QRS duration on signal-averaged electrocardiography correlates with ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction

Objectives

The relationships between filtered QRS duration and ventricular dyssynchrony were studied.

Methods

We measured filtered QRS duration on signal-averaged electrocardiography and analyzed tissue Doppler imaging in chronic heart failure patients with ejection fraction less than 50%.

Results

In 64 patients, interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchronies were observed in 25 and 38 patients, respectively. All patients with interventricular dyssynchrony were associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony. Filtered QRS showed 0.82 and 0.78 of the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for the detection of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, respectively, with 89.7% and 96.2% specificity and 52.0% and 52.6% sensitivity, with cutoff values of 174 and 153 milliseconds. Specificity and sensitivity as well as AUC were lower in the ROC of QRS duration than filtered QRS duration.

Conclusion

Filtered QRS duration provided more reliable information to estimate ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction than QRS duration did.     

Myocardial infarction-induced ventricular aneurysm in the presence of complete left bundle branch block: a case report suggesting a new electrocardiographic diagnostic criterion.

A 65-year-old man who had suffered an anterior myocardial infarction (MI) 10 years ago, complicated by a ventricular aneurysm (VA), and subsequently many years later developed complete left bundle branch block (LBBB), is described, with main emphasis on the feasibility of the electrocardiographic (ECG) diagnosis of VA in the presence of this conduction abnormality. Ventricular aneurysm in our patient was repeatedly confirmed by echocardiography over the intervening years. During the time the patient maintained normal intraventricular conduction, the ECG showed persisting ST-segment elevations in the precordial leads. After the development of LBBB, the ECG displayed accentuated ST-segment elevations in the precordial leads with predominantly negative QRS complexes, and ST elevation in V5, despite its primarily positive QRS complex. The authors extend the findings from the previous literature on the diagnosis of acute MI in patients with LBBB or right intraventricular pacing, and the concept of primary and secondary repolarization changes, to the diagnosis of VA in the presence of LBBB.     

Impact of heart rate on mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular contractility in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration

AIMS: The quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony has important diagnostic value and may help to determine optimal therapy in heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that mechanical dyssynchrony may be augmented at increased heart rates in patients with HF and normal QRS duration. METHODS AND RESULTS: From online segmental conductance catheter signals, we derived indices to quantify temporal and spatial aspects of mechanical dyssynchrony during systole in 20 control subjects, 20 HF patients with normal QRS duration, and 12 HF patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Data were collected at baseline, and then following a 40 bpm increase in heart rate induced by right atrial pacing. Mechanical dyssynchrony in HF patients with normal QRS duration or CLBBB was higher than that found in control subjects. In HF patients with normal QRS duration, mechanical dyssynchrony increased from 37.4+/-4.8% at baseline to 43.2+/-4.4% with increased heart rate (p<0.01), the resultant degree of mechanical dyssynchrony was similar to that at baseline in the HF patients with CLBBB. Increased heart rate did not affect dyssynchrony in the control patients. CONCLUSION: Mechanical dyssynchrony was augmented as heart rate increased by right atrial pacing in patients with HF and normal QRS duration.     

Evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular pacing in patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has recently emerged as an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe systolic heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Right ventricular pacing (RVP) leads to an LBBB-like pattern in the electrocardiogram. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients induced by RVP. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 33 patients with a conventional single or dual chamber pacemaker, 18 with ejection fraction (EF) > 35% and 15 with EF < or = 35%. In all patients, an intrinsic rhythm without intraventricular conduction delay (QRS < or = 120 ms) was present without RVP. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic criteria for mechanical dyssynchrony [aortic pre-ejection delay (APE), interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), delayed activation of the posterior left ventricular wall (PD), septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD)] were evaluated in all patients with and without RVP. QRS duration showed no difference between the two EF-groups without RVP (93 +/- 10 vs. 96 +/- 9 ms), but was significantly longer in patients with low EF with RVP (152 +/- 18 vs. 181 +/- 18 ms; P < 0.001). In patients with EF > 35%, only APE was slightly prolonged by RVP (111 +/- 20 vs. 129 +/- 17 ms; P = 0.03), whereas in patients with EF < or = 35% marked pathological differences in APE (118 +/- 29 vs. 169 +/- 24 ms; P < 0.001), IVMD (22 +/- 17 vs. 58 +/- 14 ms; P < 0.001), SPWMD (103 +/- 28 vs. 125 +/- 29 ms; P = 0.004), and PD (-21 +/- 25 vs. - 39 +/- 25 ms; P = 0.005) were found. A significant correlation between QRS duration and mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony was only found for two echocardiographic parameters (IVMD, APE) with RVP. CONCLUSION: In patients with a conventional pacemaker, mechanical dyssynchrony with RVP was shown exceptionally in patients with preserved or moderately depressed systolic left ventricular (LV) function, but in nearly all patients with severely depressed systolic LV function. These patients might benefit from CRT when frequent RVP is required.     

Prevalence of dyssynchrony derived from echocardiographic criteria in heart failure patients with normal or prolonged QRS duration

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for heart failure is targeted at specific patients with mechanical dyssynchrony. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with either normal or prolonged QRS duration using Doppler imaging. Sixty heart failure patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (30 with prolonged QRS duration 30 with normal QRS duration) underwent standard echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging examinations. Difference between left and right ventricular pre-ejection intervals of more than 40 msec was considered a marker of interventricular dyssynchrony. Intraventricular dyssynchrony was defined as a delay of 60 msec between the time to peak velocities of the septum and left ventricular lateral wall. Patients who have either intra- or interventricular dyssynchrony were defined as with cardiac dyssynchrony. Dyssynchrony was observed in 7 (23.3%) heart failure patients with normal QRS duration versus 26 (86.7%) patients with prolonged QRS duration. There was significant difference between the prevalence of dyssynchrony derived from echo criteria in two groups (P<0.05). Although patients with prolonged QRS duration have a high prevalence of dyssynchrony, yet some still have good cardiac synchronicity. Moreover, dyssynchrony also exists in a small percentage of heart failure patients with normal QRS duration. To identify the potential responders for CRT, both QRS duration and cardiac synchronicity should be assessed.     

Evaluation of global left ventricular function and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with an asymptomatic left bundle branch block: a real-time 3D echocardiography study.

BACKGROUND: A left bundle branch block (LBBB) affects both global left ventricular (LV) function and mechanical dyssynchrony. The aim was to evaluate global LV function and mechanical dyssynchrony with real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE), in asymptomatic LBBB patients, healthy volunteers and patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) and a LBBB. Furthermore, the relation between presence or absence of symptoms of HF and mechanical dyssynchrony was investigated. METHODS: RT3DE was performed in 61 consecutive patients: 16 healthy volunteers, 22 patients with an asymptomatic LBBB and 23 patients with symptomatic HF and a LBBB. Global LV function and the systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) were measured. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, mean LV ejection fraction was 54 +/- 5%, in asymptomatic LBBB patients 50 +/- 9%, and in HF patients 29 +/- 9%. SDI was 5.6 +/- 3.6%, 7.3 +/- 3.2% and 12.8 +/- 4.8% for healthy volunteers, asymptomatic LBBB patients and HF patients respectively. SDI differed significantly between HF patients and both other groups. A cut-off value for SDI for presence of symptoms of HF was 10.8%. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic LBBB patients have more depressed global LV function than healthy volunteers have; patients with symptoms of HF and a LBBB have severe global LV dysfunction. Asymptomatic LBBB patients have an intermediate mechanical dyssynchrony; HF patients with a LBBB have the most severe mechanical dyssynchrony. A substantial amount of mechanical dyssynchrony might be accompanied by the presence of symptoms of HF.     

REDUCED SYSTOLIC PERFOMANCE BY TISSUE DOPPLER IN PATIENTS WITH PRESERVED AND ABNORMAL EJECTION FRACTION: NEW INSIGHTS IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE

Background: Identification of the responder candidates for multisite pacing is still difficult and severe heart failure, dilated left ventricle with reduced ejection fraction, prolonged QRS with left bundle branch block (LBBB) are still considered the principal indicators of ventricular desynchronization. The aim of the study was to assess if echographic ventricular desynchronization parameters measured in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure are correlated with the duration of the QRS on surface electrocardiogram. Methods: This study included 51 patients aged 58.8 ± 7.4 years with idiopathic DCM. The following parameters were measured: QRS duration; effective contraction time (ECT) measured as the interval between QRS onset and closure of aortic valve, interventricular delay (IVD) measured as the time between onset of aortic and pulmonary flow, left ventricular mechanical delay (LVD) as the time from maximal interventricular septum contraction and posterior wall contraction, posterior (P), lateral (L), and posterolateral (PL) wall delays, as the time from QRS onset to maximal wall contraction. Regional post‐systolic contraction was defined in a given wall as the difference (contraction delay ? ECT)> 50 ms. Results: 29 patients presented complete LBBB, 22 patients had QRS duration < 120 ms. 39 patients had a post‐systolic contraction of the PL wall (32 patients of the L wall and 26 patients of the P wall). 16 patients with QRS duration <120 had a post‐systolic contraction of the PL wall (as for the LBBB the rest of 39 patients). In 40 patients the sequence of regional ventricular contraction was: P‐L‐PL wall (16 patients with QRS < 120). LVD was > 100 ms in 36 patients (26 patients with LBBB and 10 with QRS < 120). 27 patients with LBBB and 6 with QRS < 120 ms presented IVD > 30 ms. There was no correlation between the QRS duration and the parameters listed above. Conclusions: In a population of patients with severe heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy there is no correlation between the duration of the QRS and echocardiographic parameters of ventricular desynchronization. These results show that mechanical ventricular desynchronization can be observed in patients with a QRS duration < 120 ms. Further studies are needed to evaluate if this population could beneficiate of multisite pacing therapy.     

Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure.

Prolongation of QRS (> or =120 ms) occurs in 14% to 47% of heart failure (HF) patients. Left bundle branch block is far more common than right bundle branch block. Left-sided intraventricular conduction delay is associated with more advanced myocardial disease, worse left ventricular (LV) function, poorer prognosis, and a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with narrow QRS complex. It also predisposes heart failure patients to an increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but the incidence of cardiac or sudden death remains unclear because of limited observations. A progressive increase in QRS duration worsens the prognosis. No electrocardiographic measure is specific enough to provide subgroup risk categorization for excluding or selecting HF patients for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. In ICD patients with HF, a wide underlying QRS complex more than doubles the cardiac mortality compared with a narrow QRS complex. There is a high incidence of an elevated defibrillation threshold at the time of ICD implantation in patients with QRS > or =200 ms. Mechanical LV dyssynchrony potentially treatable by ventricular resynchronization occurs in about 70% of HF patients with left-sided intraventricular conduction delay, a fact that would explain the lack of therapeutic response in about 30% of patients subjected to ventricular resynchronization according to standard criteria relying on QRS duration. The duration of the basal QRS complex does not reliably predict the clinical response to ventricular resynchronization, and QRS narrowing after cardiac resynchronization therapy does not correlate with hemodynamic and clinical improvement. Mechanical LV dyssynchrony is best shown by evolving echocardiographic techniques (predominantly tissue Doppler imaging) currently in the process of standardization.     

Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure

Prolongation of QRS (> or =120 ms) occurs in 14% to 47% of heart failure (HF) patients. Left bundle branch block is far more common than right bundle branch block. Left-sided intraventricular conduction delay is associated with more advanced myocardial disease, worse left ventricular (LV) function, poorer prognosis, and a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with narrow QRS complex. It also predisposes heart failure patients to an increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but the incidence of cardiac or sudden death remains unclear because of limited observations. A progressive increase in QRS duration worsens the prognosis. No electrocardiographic measure is specific enough to provide subgroup risk categorization for excluding or selecting HF patients for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. In ICD patients with HF, a wide underlying QRS complex more than doubles the cardiac mortality compared with a narrow QRS complex. There is a high incidence of an elevated defibrillation threshold at the time of ICD implantation in patients with QRS > or =200 ms. Mechanical LV dyssynchrony potentially treatable by ventricular resynchronization occurs in about 70% of HF patients with left-sided intraventricular conduction delay, a fact that would explain the lack of therapeutic response in about 30% of patients subjected to ventricular resynchronization according to standard criteria relying on QRS duration. The duration of the basal QRS complex does not reliably predict the clinical response to ventricular resynchronization, and QRS narrowing after cardiac resynchronization therapy does not correlate with hemodynamic and clinical improvement. Mechanical LV dyssynchrony is best shown by evolving echocardiographic techniques (predominantly tissue Doppler imaging) currently in the process of standardization.