右室双部位起搏与双室同步起搏的急性血液动力学对比研究

比较右室双部位 (RV Bi)起搏和双室 (BiV)同步起搏对血液动力学的影响 ,并与右室心尖部 (RVA)、右室流出道 (RVOT)、左室基底部 (LVB)起搏相比较 ,明确双部位起搏是否优于单部位起搏。 15例患者中病窦综合征 8例、Ⅲ度房室阻滞 7例。分别行RVA、RVOT、LVB、RV Bi、BiV起搏 (VVI,6 0～ 90次 /分 ) ,测定心输出量 (CO)和心脏指数(CI)、肺毛细血管嵌顿压 (PCWP)和QRS波时限 (QRSd)。结果 :①与RVA起搏相比 ,RVOT、LVB、RV Bi、BiV起搏CI分别增加了 7.5 %、11.3%、15 .5 %和 17.2 % ,PCWP分别降低了 14.9%、10 .3%、2 1.7%和 2 0 .0 % (P均 <0 .0 1)。②RV Bi、BiV起搏较RVOT、LVB起搏的CO、CI增高而PCWP降低 (P均 <0 .0 5 )。③RV Bi与BiV起搏、RVOT与LVB起搏之间CO、CI和PCWP无显著差异。④RVOT、RV Bi、BiV起搏的QRSd(分别为 12 8± 11,111± 16 ,10 3± 13ms)较RVA起搏 (146± 18ms)时显著缩短 (P≤ 0 .0 0 1) ,而LVB起搏 (142± 15ms)与RVOT、RVA起搏时无显著差异。结论 :RV Bi起搏和BiV同步起搏的急性血液动力学效果无明显差异 ,但双部位起搏的效果明显优于单部位起搏 ;双部位起搏的QRSd也比单部位起搏明显缩短     

右心室流出道与右心室心尖部起搏对心室收缩同步性和心功能的影响

目的研究右心室流出道(right ventricular outflow tract,RVOT)间隔部和右心室心尖部(right ventricularapex,RVA)起搏对心脏收缩同步性、收缩功能的影响,探讨RVOT间隔部起搏的意义。方法 50例病态窦房结综合征患者分为RVOT组(n=25)和RVA组(n=25),起搏器置入1个月后通过调整房室间期使心室节律全部为起搏节律或房室结自身下传节律,观察起搏参数,并行超声心动图检查。结果RVOT组与RVA组电极导线植入时间、X线曝光时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全部患者未出现植入并发症。两组随访1个月时起搏参数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。RVOT组和RVA组起搏后的QRS波时限较前明显增宽,差异有统计学意义[RVOT组:(135±8)ms vs.(88±8)ms,P<0.001;RVA组:(154±8)ms vs.(90±6)ms,P<0.001]。RVA组起搏后QRS波时限较RVOT组增宽更为明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组起搏后室间机械延迟(interventricularmechanical delay,IVMD)和室间隔-左心室后壁收缩运动延迟时间(septal-to-posteriowall motion delay,SPWMD)较起搏前均显著增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。RVA组起搏后IVMD和SPWMD绝对值较RVOT组显著延长,差异有统计学意义[IVMD:(38±7)ms vs.(24±5)ms,P<0.001;SPWMD:(118±21)ms vs.(60±11)ms,P<0.001]。两组左心室舒张末内径及左心室射血分数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论右心室起搏会造成心室收缩不同步,RVOT起搏对心室收缩不同步的影响较RVA起搏小,提示RVOT起搏是较为生理的起搏位点。     

Comparison of the Acute Hemodynamic Effect of Right Ventricular Apex,Outflow Tract,and Dual‐Site Right Ventricular Pacing

Background: We studied the acute effect of pacing at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), right ventricular apex (RVA) and simultaneous RVA and RVOT—dual‐site right ventricular pacing (DuRV) in random order on systolic function using impedance cardiography. Methods: Seventy‐three patients (46 males), aged 52–89 years (mean 71.4 years) subjected to routine dual chamber pacemaker implantation with symptomatic chronic II or atrioventricular block, were included to the study. Results: DuRV pacing resulted in significantly higher cardiac index (CI) in comparison to RVOT and RVA and CI at RVOT was higher than at RVA pacing (2.46 vs 2.35 vs 2.28; P < 0.001). In patients with ejection fraction >50% significantly higher CI was observed during DuRV pacing when compared to RVOT and RVA pacing and there was no difference of CI between RVOT and RVA pacing (2.53 vs 2.41 vs 2.37; P < 0.001). In patients with ejection fraction <50%, DuRV and RVOT pacing resulted in significantly higher CI in comparison to RVA pacing while no difference in CI was observed between RVOT and DuRV pacing (2.28 vs 2.21 vs 2.09; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Dual‐site right ventricular pacing in comparison to RVA pacing improved cardiac systolic function. RVOT appeared to be more advantageous than RVA pacing in patients with impaired, but not in those with preserved left ventricular function. No clear hemodynamic benefit of DuRV in comparison to RVOT pacing in patients with impaired systolic function was observed. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(4):353‐359     

Left Atrial Responses to Acute Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome

Chronic right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing can lead to an increased risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but the acute effects of RVA pacing on left atrial (LA) function are not well known. Twenty‐four patients with sick sinus syndrome and intact intrinsic atrioventricular conduction were included. All patients received dual‐chamber pacemaker implants with the atrial lead in the right atrial appendage and the ventricular lead in the right ventricular (RV) apex. Transthoracic standard and strain echocardiography (measured by tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking image) were performed to identify functional changes in the left ventricle (LV) and LA before and after 1 hour of RVA pacing. The LA volume index did not change after pacing; however, the ratio of peak early diastolic mitral flow velocity (E) to peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (Ea) was significantly increased and peak systolic LA strain (Sm), mean peak systolic LA strain rate (SmSR), peak early diastolic LA strain rate (EmSR), and peak late diastolic LA strain rate (AmSR) were significantly reduced after RV pacing. LV dyssynchrony, induced by RV pacing, had a significant correlation with E/Ea, Sm, and SmSR after pacing. E/Ea also had a negative correlation with Sm and SmSR after pacing. Multivariate regression analysis identified LV dyssynchrony and E/Ea as important factors that affect Sm, SmSR, EmSR, and AmSR after acute RVA pacing. Acute RVA pacing results in LA functional change and LV dyssynchrony and higher LV filling pressures reflected by E/Ea are important causes of LA dysfunction after acute RVA pacing.     

Long‐Term Mechanical Consequences of Permanent Right Ventricular Pacing: Effect of Pacing Site

Optimal Right Ventricular Pacing Introduction: Long‐term right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been associated with adverse effects on left ventricular systolic function; however, the comparative effects of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing are unknown. Our aim was therefore to examine the long‐term effects of septal RVOT versus RVA pacing on left ventricular and atrial structure and function. Methods: Fifty‐eight patients who were prospectively randomized to long‐term pacing either from the right ventricular apex or RVOT septum were studied echocardiographically. Left ventricular (LV) and atrial (LA) volumes were measured. LV 2D strain and tissue velocity images were analyzed to measure 18‐segment time‐to‐peak longitudinal systolic strain and 12‐segment time‐to‐peak systolic tissue velocity. Intra‐LV synchrony was assessed by their respective standard deviations. Interventricular mechanical delay was measured as the difference in time‐to‐onset of systolic flow in the RVOT and LV outflow tract. Septal A’ was measured using tissue velocity images. Results: Following 29 ± 10 months pacing, there was a significant difference in LV ejection fraction (P < 0.001), LV end‐systolic volume (P = 0.007), and LA volume (P = 0.02) favoring the RVOT‐paced group over the RVA‐paced patients. RVA‐pacing was associated with greater interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and intra‐LV dyssynchrony than RVOT‐pacing. Septal A’ was adversely affected by intra‐LV dyssynchrony (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Long‐term RVOT‐pacing was associated with superior indices of LV structure and function compared with RVA‐pacing, and was associated with less adverse LA remodeling. If pacing cannot be avoided, the RVOT septum may be the preferred site for right ventricular pacing. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1120‐1126)     

右室流出道起搏现状

右室心尖部作为传统的永久心脏起搏器植入位点,主要是因为电极容易放置及电极脱位率低。但是心尖部起搏属非生理性起搏,它使心室除极和机械收缩发生异常,从而导致长期的血流动力学紊乱(心室收缩和舒张异常)和组织结构的改变。随着近年主动固定的螺旋电极及螺旋电极操作手柄的问世,使右室流出道起搏成为可能。大量动物实验和临床研究提示右室流出道靠近房室结、希氏束部位,在此部位起搏心室激动和收缩顺序趋于正常,从而能明显的改善血流动力学指标。目前右室流出道起搏尚处于临床实验阶段,且关于右室流出道解剖位点的确定,适宜患者群的筛选标准、监测和评价指标的选择尚无统一的标准。其长期效果及能否改善患者预后等还有待更深入的研究。现就目前国内外关于右室流出道起搏的研究现状综述如下。     

右心室流出道间隔部起搏对左心室功能的影响

目的比较右心室流出道间隔部(RVOT)起搏与右心室心尖部(RVA)起搏的血流动力学差异;评估RVOT起搏技术的可行性与安全性。方法选择有永久起搏器置入适应证的患者75例。根据术者建议和患者意愿分为RVOT组(40例)和RVA组(35例)。所有房室传导阻滞及病窦综合征合并一度房室传导阻滞患者采用双腔起搏双腔感知触发抑制型起搏模式,心房颤动伴长间歇患者采用抑制型心室按需起搏模式。比较2组的血流动力学差异。结果 RVOT组的QRS波宽度较RVA组缩窄(23.2±28.7)ms,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。与RVA组比较,RVOT组LVEF、左心室短轴缩短率明显升高,左心室舒张末容积明显下降(P<0.05,P<0.01)。与术前比较,RVA组LVEF、左心室短轴缩短率明显下降,左心室舒张末容积明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论利用螺旋电极进行RVOT起搏可行且较为安全。RVOT起搏的血流动力学参数优于RVA。     

Pacing-Induced Electromechanical Ventricular Dyssynchrony Does Not Acutely Influence Right Ventricular Function and Global Hemodynamics in Children with Normal Hearts

Background: Right ventricular (RV) pacing may be detrimental to ventricular function. However, the acute effects of electromechanical dyssynchrony on RV function are not well characterized in children. We studied acute effects of electromechanical dyssynchrony, induced by RV apical and RV outflow pacing, in children with normal hearts, evaluating electromechanical synchrony, hemodynamic response, and RV function. Methods: Seventeen children (mean ± SD, 12 ± 4 years) with normal cardiac structure/function were paced after accessory pathway ablation, at baseline (AOO), and with AV pacing (DOO) from the RV apex and RV outflow. QRS duration was determined from surface ECG. Intra‐ and interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and regional ventricular function were determined using tissue Doppler imaging. Global RV systolic and diastolic functions were assessed by RV dP/dT_max and RV dP/dT_neg using pressure‐tipped transducers. Regional RV function was assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. Cardiac index (CI) and blood pressures were measured. Results: RV apical and outflow pacing induced significant electromechanical dyssynchrony manifested by lengthening of the QRS duration, increased LV intraventricular delay (49 ± 34 ms, 53 ± 43 ms, respectively, P < 0.001), and increased interventricular delay (60 ± 29 ms, 55 ± 37 ms, P < 0.0001) versus AOO pacing. However, there was no change in blood pressure, CI, RV dp/dT_max, RV dP/dT_neg, or regional tissue Doppler velocities, indicating preserved hemodynamics and preserved global and regional RV systolic and diastolic function. Conclusions: In children with normal cardiac function and structure, pacing‐induced electromechanical dyssynchrony did not acutely affect RV systolic and diastolic function and did not acutely alter global hemodynamics. Therefore, electromechanical dyssynchrony may only be an important therapeutic target in the setting of decreased RV function.     

Acute Changes in Cardiac Synchrony and Output According to RV Pacing Sites in Koreans with Normal Cardiac Function

Introduction: The synchrony of the pacing heart can be affected by the right ventricular (RV) pacing site and is crucial to cardiac function in pacemaker recipients. We evaluated the acute changes in cardiac synchrony according to the RV pacing sites in normal systolic functioning subjects with normal QRS. Methods: We conducted this study with 30 patients with the pacing in the RV apex (RVA), RV septum (RVS), and RV outflow tract (RVOT) in a sequential manner . Transthoracic echocardiography was conducted at rest and during pacing in order to measure interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony in all patients. Results: QRS duration (148.1 ± 12.8 ms) of RVA pacing was significantly shorter than that of RVS pacing (154.4 ± 14.1 ms, P < 0.01) and RVOT pacing (160.6 ± 15.7 ms, P < 0.001). We noted no statistically significant difference in cardiac output according to the pacing sites. The interventricular dyssynchrony with M-mode and Doppler echocardiography in RVOT pacing was increased to an insignificant degree as compared with those with RVS pacing or RVA pacing. The intraventricular dyssynchrony with tissue Doppler echocardiography in RVA pacing was reduced significantly as compared with that of RVS pacing or RVOT (RVA = 60.3 ± 32.7 ms, RVS = 82.1 ± 33.8 ms, RVOT = 79.1 ± 33.3 ms; RVA vs RVS = P < 0.05, RVA vs RVOT = P < 0.01, RVS vs RVOT = P = NS). Conclusion: RVA pacing is superior to RVS and RVOT pacing with regard to intraventricular synchrony in normal systolic functioning subjects with normal QRS. Cardiac output at RVA pacing is not inferior to other sites.     

右室心尖部起搏与右室流出道起搏对Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞患者疗效的对比研究

目的:比较右室心尖部起搏与右室流出道起搏对Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞患者心室间运动同步性及左室内运动同步性,以及对患者心功能的影响。方法:选取因Ⅲ度及高度房室传导阻滞患者置入双腔起搏器患者共38例。其中心室电极置入右室流出道者20例(RVOT组),置入右室心尖部18例(RVA组),超声心动图术前测量左室舒张末内径(LVEDD),左室收缩末内径(LVESD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、E/A值、心室间激动延迟时间(IVMD)、室间隔与左心室后壁间收缩延迟时间(SPWMD)。术后1个月、12个月随访。结果:术后1个月,与RVOT组比较,RVA组IVMD、SPWMD明显延长[IVMD(39.83±6.01)∶(31.95±7.86)ms,P=0.02],[SP-WMD(97.83±20.81)∶(84.6±10.89)ms,P=0.023]。术后12个月,与ROVT组比较,RVA组LVEDD明显增大[(49.11±2.39)∶(47.4±1.96)mm,P=0.02],LVESD明显增大[(34.28±3.41)∶(32.5±1.5)mm,P=0.04];LVEF明显降低[(59.56±3.38)∶(62.8±2.14)%,...     

Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies suggest that right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has deleterious effects. Whether the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is a more optimal site for permanent pacing in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, cross-over trial to determine whether quality of life (QOL) is better after 3 months of RVOT than RVA pacing in 103 pacemaker recipients with CHF, left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction < or = 40%), and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). An additional aim was to compare dual-site (RVOT + RVA, 31-ms delay) with single-site RVA and RVOT pacing. QRS duration was shorter during RVOT (167 +/- 45 ms) and dual-site (149 +/- 19 ms) than RVA pacing (180 +/- 58 ms, P < 0.0001). At 6 months, the RVOT group had higher (P = 0.01) role-emotional QOL subscale scores than the RVA group. At 9 months, there were no significant differences in QOL scores between RVOT and RVA groups. Comparing RVOT to RVA pacing within the same patient, mental health subscale scores were better (P = 0.03) during RVOT pacing. After 9 months of follow-up, LVEF was higher (P = 0.04) in those assigned to RVA rather than RVOT pacing between months 6 and 9. After 3 months of dual-site RV pacing, physical functioning was worse (P = 0.04) than during RVA pacing, mental health was worse (P = 0.02) than during RVOT pacing, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was slightly better (P = 0.03) than during RVOT pacing. There were no other significant differences between RVA, RVOT and dual-site RV pacing in QOL scores, NYHA class, distance walked in 6 minutes, LV ejection fraction, or mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSION: In patients with CHF, LV dysfunction, and chronic AF, RVOT and dual-site RV pacing shorten QRS duration but after 3 months do not consistently improve QOL or other clinical outcomes compared with RVA pacing.     

Upgrading Pacemaker Patients with Right Ventricular Apical Pacing to Right Ventricular Septal Pacing Improves Left Ventricular Performance and Functional Capacity

Background : Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing results in abnormal left ventricular (LV) electrical and mechanical activation and is associated with an increased risk of developing heart failure. Chronic RV septal pacing has been shown to be superior to RV apical pacing in newly implanted patients. However, whether RV septal pacing can reverse deleterious effects of RV apical pacing remain unclear.
Methods : We evaluated the effects of RV septal pacing on LV performance and functional capacity before and at 18 months after device replacement in 12 patients with previously permanent RV apical pacing and in 12 control patients that continued RV apical pacing. All patients underwent radionuclide ventriculography and 6-minute hallwalk (6-MHW) test before replacement (baseline) and at 18 months afterward to determine changes in LV performance and functional capacity, respectively.
Results : After RV septal upgraded, there was a significant decrease in paced QRS duration (171.2 ± 3.9 ms to 160.4 ± 3.5 ms, P = 0.0016), increase in LV ejection fraction (55.2 ± 2.6% vs 60.4 ± 2.9%, P = 0.0002), the peak ventricular filling rate (2.60 ± 0.13 s⁻¹ vs 3.01 ± 0.14 s⁻¹, P = 0.046), and 6-MHW (308.2 ± 31.6 m vs 355.5 ± 34.2 m, P = 0.015) at 18 months compared with baseline. No changes in these parameters were observed in the control group (P > 0.05).
Conclusion : RV septal pacing upgraded improves LV systolic and diastolic function and functional capacity in patients with previously permanent RV apical pacing. These findings suggest that RV septal pacing can reverse the deleterious effects of RV apical pacing in patients who required permanent ventricular pacing.     

Hemodynamic improvement by right ventricular septal pacing in elderly patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and slow ventricular response

Background and objectives Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been reported impairing left ventricular (LV) performance. Alternative pacing sites in right ventricle (RV) has been explored to obtain better cardiac function. Our study was designed to compare the hemodynamic effects of right ventricular septal (RVS) pacing with RVA pacing. Methods Ten elderly patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and long RR interval or slow ventricular response (VR) received VVI pacing. The hemodynamic difference between RVS and RVA pacing were examined by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Results Pacing leads were implanted successfully at the RVA and then RVS in all patients without complication. The left ventricular (LV) parameters, measured during RVA pacing including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), FS, stroke volume (SV) and peak E wave velocity (EV) were decreased significantly compared to baseline data, while during RVS pacing, they were significantly better than those during RVA pacing. However, after 3-6 weeks there was no statistical significant difference between pre- and post- RVS pacing. Conclusions The LV hemodynamic parameters during RVA pacing were significantly worse than baseline data. The short term LV hemodynamic parameters of RVS pacing were significantly better than those of RVA pacing; RVS pacing could improve the hemodynamic effect through maintaining normal ventricular activation sequence and biventricular contraction synchrony in patients with chronic AF and slow ventricular response.(J Geriatr Cardiol 2005,2(2): 103-106).     

Apparent Acute Reversible Right Ventricular Pacing‐Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Apparent Acute Reversible Right Ventricular Pacing‐Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction . We report the case of a 70‐year‐old Caucasian male with a dual chamber (right atrium/right ventricle) pacemaker implanted for sinus node dysfunction and not pacemaker (PM) dependent who was found to have an apparent acute worsening of left ventricular (LV) function with right ventricular (RV) apical pacing caused by the mode switch to VVI pacing as battery depletion occurred. LV dysfunction resolved immediately with RV pacing turned off. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this phenomenon. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 224‐226, February 2013)     

New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function

Introduction: Emerging data have suggested that right ventricular (RV) apical pacing results in progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and contributes to the development of heart failure (HF). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical predictors for the development of new-onset HF after long-term RV apical pacing in patients with acquired atrioventricular (AV) block who require permanent pacing.
Methods: We studied the clinical outcomes after long-term RV apical pacing for acquired AV block in 304 patients without a prior history of HF. All patients had >90% ventricular pacing as determined by device diagnostic data.
Results: After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 79 patients (26.0%) developed new-onset HF after RV apical pacing. Univariate Cox-regression analysis revealed that older age at the time of pacemaker implantation (P < 0.001), the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (P < 0.001) or atrial fibrillation (P = 0.03), VVI pacemaker (P < 0.001), wider paced QRS duration (P < 0.001), and new-onset myocardial infarction (P < 0.001) were predictors for HF. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age at implantation (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.04–1.09, P < 0.001), CAD (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.12–3.50, P < 0.05), and a wider paced QRS duration (HR 1.27 for each 10 ms increment, 95% CI 1.11–1.45, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of HF. Furthermore, cardiovascular mortality was significantly increased in those with HF (36.7% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, permanent RV apical pacing was associated with HF in 26% of patients. Elderly age at the time of implant, a wider paced QRS duration and the presence of CAD independently predicted new-onset HF. More importantly, HF after RV apical pacing was associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality.     

起搏负荷超声心动图评价右室高位室间隔起搏和右室心尖部起搏对心脏功能的影响

目的评价右室高位室间隔(HRVS)起搏和右室心尖部(RVA)起搏对心脏结构和功能的影响。方法71例病窦综合征、完全性房室传导阻滞患者根据心室起搏电极植入部位的不同,随机分为HRVS起搏组(36例)和RVA起搏组(35例)。分别于术前、术后3个月和术后12个月通过超声心动图和起搏负荷超声心动图检查对患者左室收缩和舒张末期容积(LVESV和LVEDV)、左右室射血前时间差值(LRVPEI)、室间隔与左室后壁收缩延迟时间(SPWMD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)等相关指标进行观察随访。结果术后3个月、12个月时,两组各项起搏参数均无差别。术后3个月时,HRVS起搏组的LRVPEI和SPWMD均明显小于RVA起搏组(P<0.05),两组间其他指标在基础状态超声下无显著差别,在起搏负荷超声下HRVS起搏组的LVEF明显高于RVA起搏组(P<0.05)。术后12个月时,HRVS起搏组的LRVPEI、SPWMD和LVESV三项指标均显著小于RVA起搏组(P<0.05),LVEF明显高于RVA起搏组(P<0.01);LVEDV小于RVA起搏组,但无统计学意义。结论HRVS起搏对心脏结构和功能的不良影响明显低于RVA起搏。     

Synchronous Ventricular Pacing without Crossing the Tricuspid Valve or Entering the Coronary Sinus—Preliminary Results

Background: Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing promotes tricuspid regurgitation (TR), electromechanical dyssynchrony, and ventricular dysfunction. We tested a novel intramyocardial bipolar lead to assess whether stimulation of the atrioventricular septum (AVS) produces synchronous ventricular activation without crossing the tricuspid valve (TV). Methods: A lead with an active external helix and central pin was placed on the AVS and the RVA in three dogs. High‐density electroanatomic (EA) mapping was performed of both ventricles endocardially and epicardially. Intracardiac echocardiography was used to access ventricular synchrony. Results: The lead was successfully deployed into the AVS in all cases with consistent capture of the ventricular myocardium without atrial capture or sensing. The QRS duration was less with AVS compared with RVA pacing (89 ± 4 ms vs. 100 ± 11 ms [P < 0.0001, GEE P = 0.03]). There was decreased delay between color Doppler M‐mode visualized peak contraction of the septum and the mid left ventricular free wall with AVS compared with RVA pacing (89 ± 91 ms vs. 250 ± 11 ms [P < 0.0001, GEE P = 0.006]). Activation time between the mid septum and mid free wall was shorter with AVS versus RVA pacing (20.4 ± 7.7 vs. 30.8 ± 11.6 [P = 0.01, GEE P = 0.07]). The interval between QRS onset to earliest free wall activation was shorter with AVS vs. RVA pacing (19.2 ± 6.4 ms vs. 31.1 ± 11.7 ms [P = 0.005, GEE P = 0.02]). Conclusion: The AVS was successfully paced in three dogs resulting in synchronous ventricular activation without crossing the TV.     

右心室不同部位起搏对心脏收缩同步性及心功能的影响

目的比较右心室流出道（right ventricular outflow tract,RVOT）起搏与右心窀心尖部（riht ventficular apex,RVA）起搏对心脏收缩同步性指标及收缩功能的影响。方法2004年1月至2005年1月在我院植入VVL／VVIR,DDD／DDDR起搏器的患者,随机接受RVA起搏和RVOT起搏。植入前检查12导联体表心电罔及超声心动图,记录QRS时限、左心室舒张末内径（LVEDD）、左心房内径（LAD）、左心事射血分数（LVEF）。植入后记录心室起搏状态下的QRS时限。随访时间为2年,随访内容包括LVEDD、LAD、LVEF,同时应用脉冲组织多普勒技术测定心室问激动延迟（IVMD）以及左心室内收缩同步性指标（Ts-SD）。结果共随访30例患者,其中RVA起搏17例,RVOT起搏13例,两组患者间年龄、性别及心血管疾病等基本情况筹异无统计学意义。植入前两组患者问QRS时限、LVEDD、LAD及LVEF差异无统计学意义,植入后RVOT起搏状态下QRS时限较RVA起搏明显缩短[（140．15±11．36）ms对（160．76±23．68）ms,P=0．033],植入后两组间IVMD[（25．7±9．1）mS对（36．7±10．0）ms,P=0．076]比较差异无统计学意义,两组问Ts—SD（13．34ms对42．96ms,P=0．001）比较差异有统计学意义;植入后随访两年,两组患者间LAD差异无统计学意义[（43±6）ms对（42±9）ms,P=0．759],同RVA组相比,RVOT组LVEDD缩小[（5．10±0．76）mm对（5．28±0．40）mm,P=0．048],LVEF明显增加（0．56±0．04对0．52±0．02,P=0．001）。结论同右心窄流出道起搏相比,右心室心尖部起搏对患者心功能呈负性影响,且加重左心室内不同步收缩。     

Acute mechanical effect of right ventricular pacing at different sites using velocity vector imaging

Objective: Velocity vector imaging (VVI) allows noninvasive measurement of left ventricular (LV) strain and rotation angle‐independently. We investigated strain, rotation and myocardial synchrony when pacing at different sites in the right ventricle to determine which site yields the most physiological pacing, as determined with VVI imaging. Method: Thirty‐one patients with normal LV function referred for elective electrophysiology exam were used in this study. Catheters (6F quadripolar) were positioned in the right atrium, right ventricular apex, right ventricular outflow tract, and His bundle after electrophysiology exam was done. Regional and global LV circumferential strain (CS), radial strain (RS), and LV rotation of LV short‐axis measurements were obtained. Two dyssynchrony parameters (AS‐P delay and SDt_6S) of CS and RS were obtained. Compare these values among each pacing, respectively. Result: CS, RS, and twist, which represent the LV systolic function, were significantly reduced in RVOT pacing and RVA pacing than RA pacing. Two dyssynchrony parameters (AS‐P delay and SDt_6S) were significantly longer in response to RVOT or RVA pacing compared to RA pacing. No significant differences were found between RVOT pacing and RVA pacing. CS and RS were obviously reduced in the regions surrounding the pacing site. There was no significant difference in CS, RS, twist, and mechanical dyssynchrony parameters when comparing His and RA pacing. Conclusion: Among these alternate right ventricular pacing locations, His bundle pacing is most like physiological pacing. Both RVOT pacing and RVA pacing worsen the normal LV systolic function with regard to strain, twist, and mechanical dyssynchrony along the LV short axis. (Echocardiography 2010;27:1219‐1227)     

二维斑点追踪纵向应变评价不同部位右心室起搏患者心脏收缩同步性

目的利用二维斑点追踪超声纵向应变比较不同部位右心室起搏对左心室收缩不同步性的影响。方法有双腔起搏器植入指征的无器质性心脏病变患者共60例,按1:1随机数表法随机分为两组,根据分组结果分别将右心室电极植入右心室流出道间隔部(right ventricular outflow tract septum,RVOTs)及右心室心尖(right ventricular apex,RVA)。术后起搏器程控并保证心室完全起搏后,进行二维斑点超声成像分析,记录左心室收缩时纵向应变达峰时间的最大差(LS-TD)。结果 RVA组左心室收缩时纵向应变最大差大于RVOT组,差异有统计学意义[(161.6±43.9)ms vs.(74.3±13.7)ms,P<0.001]。结论二维斑点追踪超声纵向应变结果显示RVOT起搏时的左心室收缩同步性优于RVA起搏。