Prognostic Effect of Perioperative Change of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level: A Useful Tool for Detection of Systemic Recurrence in Rectal Cancer

Background The prognosis of patients even with the same stage of rectal cancer varies widely. We analyzed the capability of perioperative change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level for predicting recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients. Methods We reviewed 631 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for stage II or III rectal cancer. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their serum CEA concentrations on the seventh day before and on the seventh day after surgery: group A, normal CEA level (≤5 ng/mL) in both periods; group B, increased preoperative and normal postoperative CEA; and group C, continuously increased CEA in both periods. The prognostic relevance of the CEA group was investigated by analyses of recurrence patterns and survival. Results Stage III patients showed higher systemic recurrence (P = .001) and worse 5-year survival rates (P < .0001) for group C than for groups A and B. On multivariate analysis, the CEA group was a significant predictor for recurrence (P < .001; relative risk, 2.740; 95% confidence interval, 1.677–4.476) and survival (P = .001; relative risk, 2.174; 95% confidence interval, 1.556–3.308). Conclusions The perioperative serum CEA change was a useful prognostic indicator to predict for systemic recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer patients.     

Preoperative high CEA level in lung cancer patients: significant of measurement of serum CEA level among preoperative and postoperative course in long time observed patient]

We measured pre- and postoperative CEA level in 330 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer at Kyushu Cancer Center Hospital between 1983 and 1986 using RIA method. There were 93 patients with high preoperative serum CEA level above 5 ng/ml. The interrelationships among preoperative serum CEA level, prognostic factors, outcome, and postoperative change of CEA level were investigated in the 93 patients. Five-year survival rate of patients with preoperative serum CEA level ranging from 5.0 to 10.0 ng/ml (N = 53) was 60.0%, while that of patients with preoperative CEA level over 10.1 ng/ml (N = 40) was 24.6% (P less than 0.05). Recurrent rate was higher in patients with preoperative CEA level over 10.1 ng/ml, especially in those with lung cancer at stages I or II. However, patients with preoperative CEA level about 50 ng/ml, showed good outcome after curative resection. All 12 patients in whom postoperative serum CEA level did not return to normal died within 4 years, indicating that normalization of CEA level is an important factor in prognosis. This study indicates that among lung cancer patients with high serum CEA level, the preoperative CEA level and postoperative change of CEA level are apparently prognostic factors.     

Kidney Metastasis of Resected Early Gastric Carcinoma: Report of a Case

We report a rare case of kidney metastasis of resected early gastric cancer in a 67-year-old man. We performed distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer, which was histologically diagnosed as moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (T1N0M0, stage IA). Preoperatively, his serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was 9.5 ng/ml, and this dropped to 7.0 ng/ml postoperatively. However, 1 year 10 months after the operation, we performed partial kidney resection and the lesion was confirmed to be a metastasis of the gastric cancer. Unfortunately, 5 months later, multiple liver metastasis was found, accompanied by a further increase in the serum CEA level to 2 650.8 ng/ml. This case illustrates the poor prognosis associated with a high preoperative serum CEA level, even if early gastric cancer is resected curatively.     

Impact of the post/preoperative serum CEA ratio on the survival of patients with rectal cancer

Purpose

This study demonstrated the usefulness of the post/preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio as a predictor of survival after surgery for stage III rectal cancer patients.

Methods

One hundred and four patients with stage III rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 1991 and 2000 were enrolled. The ratio of the postoperative serum CEA value divided by the preoperative serum CEA value was defined as post/preoperative serum CEA ratio, and the patients were separated into two groups: post/preoperative serum CEA ratio ≤1 (n = 86) and >1 (n = 18).

Results

The multivariate analyses demonstrated that the intraoperative blood loss, lack of a sphincter-saving procedure and a post/preoperative serum CEA ratio >1 were independent factors predicting a poor prognosis for the overall and disease-free survival. The overall and disease-free survival rates among patients with a high preoperative serum CEA level (>5 ng/ml) or patients with a high postoperative serum CEA (>5 ng/ml) were longer in patients with a post/preoperative serum CEA ratio ≤1, in comparison to those with a post/preoperative serum CEA ratio >1. Liver metastasis was observed more frequently in patients with a post/preoperative serum CEA ratio >1.

Conclusions

The post/preoperative serum CEA ratio may be a predictor of the prognosis after surgery for stage III rectal cancer patients.     

Inflammation-Based Prognostic System Predicts Postoperative Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients with a Normal Preoperative Serum Level of Carcinoembryonic Antigen

Background

Although carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a valuable indicator for estimating the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), some patients with advanced CRC show no elevation of the CEA level. On the other hand, inflammation-based prognosis, assessed by the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), has been established as one of the important prognostic factors of survival after surgery for several types of cancer. We estimated the postoperative survival of CRC patients with a normal preoperative serum level of CEA on the basis of the GPS.

Methods

Among 491 patients who had undergone elective CRC surgery, 271 with a normal preoperative serum CEA level (??5.0?ng/ml) were enrolled. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship to overall survival. Kaplan?CMeier analysis and log rank test were used to compare the survival curves between patients with GPS 0 (group A), and 1 or 2 (group B).

Results

Univariate analyses using clinical characteristics revealed that lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, platelet count, the serum levels of CEA and C-reactive protein, tumor, node, metastasis staging system (stage 0, I, II/III, IV), and the GPS (0/1, 2) were associated with overall survival. Among these characteristics, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the GPS and platelet count were associated with overall survival. Kaplan?CMeier analysis and log rank test demonstrated a significant difference in overall survival between groups A and B (P?Conclusions Even if CRC patients have a normal preoperative serum level of CEA before surgery, the GPS is able to predict their postoperative survival.     

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with preoperative normal serum level

Objective  The prognostic significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a normal serum CEA level (<5.0 ng/ml) was examined. Methods  A total of 220 consecutive NSCLC patients with preoperative normal serum CEA levels were included. Patients were subdivided into two groups: preoperative serum CEA level ≥2.5 and <2.5 ng/ml. Results  The 5-year survival of patients with preoperative serum CEA level less and more than 2.5 ng/ml were 79.62% and 62.0%, respectively (P = 0.0036). Multivariate analysis indicated that a preoperative serum CEA level of ≥2.5 ng/ml was an independent prognostic factor. Similar results were found in patients with adenocarcinoma but not found in others. Conclusion  NSCLC patients with a high serum CEA level, especially adenocarcinoma patients, had poorer prognosis even if their serum CEA levels were within the normal upper limit.     

Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21-1 in patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prognostic value of serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CYFRA21-1) in patients with pathologic (p-) stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing complete resection. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-five patients (163 males, 112 females, mean age 67.1 years) with p-stage I NSCLC who underwent complete resection at our institution between April 1999 and October 2004 were examined. Patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded, as were patients who had multiple malignancies including multiple lung cancer. The serum levels of tumor markers were measured using commercially available immunoassays within 1 month before surgical resection. Serum levels of CEA and CYFRA21-1 higher than 5.0 and 2.8 ng/ml, respectively, were considered as positive according to the manufacture's instructions. RESULTS: The histological classification was adenocarcinoma in 193 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 71, large cell carcinoma in 5, and other histological type in 6. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had T1 disease and 118 patients had T2 disease. The positive ratio of CEA and CYFRA21-1 was 25.7% and 13.7%, respectively, and in relation to histological type was 27.8% and 7.8% in adenocarcinoma, and 20.6% and 28.4% in squamous cell carcinoma. The overall 5-year survival rate was 79.3%. With a median follow-up of 35.5 month for surviving patients, those with initial CYFRA21-1 serum levels higher than 2.8 ng/ml had a significantly worse prognosis (p=0.0041). Patients with an elevated preoperative CEA level exceeding 5.0 ng/ml had a shorter disease-free survival period (p=0.0003). In patients with adenocarcinoma, a CEA level above 5.0 ng/ml was associated with shorter survival and early recurrence, whereas CYFRA21-1 showed no such association. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, elevated preoperative CEA was not related to survival and recurrence. In these patients, preoperative CYFRA21-1 level exceeding 2.8 ng/ml was associated with a poorer outcome, whereas preoperative CYFRA21-1 level was not associated with cancer recurrence. CONCLUSION: The patients with p-stage I adenocarcinoma whose preoperative CEA level was high might be considered as good candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. The prognostic value of CYFRA21-1 could not be confirmed for stage I NSCLC, and preoperative CYFRA21-1 level was not useful in selecting the candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer

Objective   Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the serum and the tumour tissue of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is the most commonly used tumour marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis or recurrence after treatment, but the role remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic value of CEA both in serum and tumour tissue in CRC.
Method  A total of 173 patients with CRC in stages I–III were retrospectively assessed with the endpoint of recurrence or metastasis after curative operation. CEA was assessed both in serum and tumour tissue.
Results  37.0% (64/173) patients had a high level of CEA in serum (S-CEA) while 39.3% (68/173) had high CEA in tumour tissue (T-CEA). There were no significant differences in clinico-pathological features between the low and high S-CEA or T-CEA groups. The high S-CEA group had a worse prognosis than the low S-CEA group but the difference was not significant. The high T-CEA group had a significantly poorer prognosis than the low T-CEA group ( P  =   0.028) in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the T-CEA was an independent prognosis factor in CRC. Because many factors would affect the concentration of S-CEA, there was no correlation between S-CEA and T-CEA directly.
Conclusion  Our study suggests that a high T-CEA concentration may be a useful and independent predictor for poor outcome after surgery in CRC patients. It may be stronger than a high preoperative serum CEA level.     

Serum p53 Antibody as Tumor Marker for Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection

Background  No large-scale studies have examined the use of serial measurements of serum p53 antibodies (s-p53Abs) combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements during the follow-up of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after curative resection. Methods  A highly specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to analyze s-p53Abs levels in 305 CRC patients before and after curative resection at a single institution. Agreement between recurrence and serial s-p53Ab and CEA measurements was evaluated by diagnostic accuracy odds ratio (DOR), kappa, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results  Among 305 patients, 76 (25%) patients had disease recurrence during follow-up. None of the 168 s-p53Ab seronegative patients (s-p53Ab < 10 U/μL) without recurrence had an abnormal s-p53Ab test during follow-up. Among the remaining low-level (10 U/μL ≤ s-p53Ab ≤ 76 U/μL, n = 103) and high-level (s-p53Ab titer > 76 U/μL, n = 34) seropositive patients, recurrence defined by s-p53Ab tests resulted in a DOR of 4.3 and ∞, a kappa of 0.35 and 1.00, and an AUC of 0.633 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.495 to 0.772; P = 0.047], and 1.0 (95% CI, 1.000 to 1.000; P < 0.0001), respectively. Recurrence defined by CEA tests had an AUC of 0.781 (95% CI, 0.654 to 0.909) for low-level and 0.796 (95% CI, 0.611 to 0.982) for high-level seropositive patients. Conclusions  Agreement between clinical recurrence and serial s-p53Ab test was dependent upon preoperative s-p53Ab level. Serial s-p53Ab testing outperformed CEA testing when predicting clinical recurrence in colorectal cancer patients with an abnormal preoperative s-p53Ab level.     

Surveillance with serial serum carcinoembryonic levels detect colorectal cancer recurrences in patients who are initial nonsecretors

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, elevated in a subgroup of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) at presentation, are serially followed as part of recommended surveillance after initial resection. The value of following serial CEA levels in patients who initially present with less than or normal levels of CEA (nonsecretors) is controversial. This study sought to determine the use of follow-up CEA levels in nonsecretors. A retrospective review was performed of patients with resected Stage I, II, and III CRC. We excluded patients who did not have a pretreatment CEA level, at least two follow-up CEA levels, or in whom CEA levels did not normalize after resection. The patients were grouped by initial CEA values: CEA 5 ng/mL or less (nonsecretors) and CEA 5 + ng/mL: (secretors). We identified 186 patients with CRC; 146 were initial nonsecretors. We identified 22 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer; 6 were secretors and 16 patients were nonsecretors. In the secretors group, CEA was elevated with recurrence in four (66%) of the patients. In the nonsecretors, CEA was elevated with recurrence in eight (50%) of the patients. In summary, many recurrences of CRC are marked by an elevation of CEA regardless of whether the patients initially presented as secretors or nonsecretors.     

Effect of Preoperative Hyperfibrinogenemia on Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer Without a Systemic Inflammatory Response

Background  Disorders in the blood coagulation system are often associated with malignancy. Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have been shown to have abnormal data for various coagulation tests. Methods  We retrospectively analyzed the relation between the preoperative plasma fibrinogen level and tumor recurrence in 569 patients with CRC who underwent curative surgical resection and were followed up without adjuvant chemotherapy. Results  The plasma fibrinogen level showed a positive association with tumor recurrence, age, sex, T stage, and TNM classification. When divided with the median value, hyperfibrinogenemia is positively correlated with tumor recurrence, although it lost independence in the multivariate analysis. In the C-reactive protein (CRP)-negative population, hyperfibrinogenemia is independently correlated with tumor recurrence and recurrence-free survival. In contrast, hyperfibrinogenemia has no effect on recurrence in CRP-positive patients. Conclusions   Hyperfibrinogenemia is clinically relevant in tumor recurrence before a systemic inflammatory response and thus can be a useful predictor of recurrence in the preinflammatory stage of CRC.     

Development of a novel prediction model for recurrent stage II colon cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer. High-risk stage II is defined by clinicopathological factors in some guidelines. However, there is no unified definition. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and develop a novel model to predict the recurrence of stage II colon cancer. Three hundred fifty patients who underwent curative resection for stage II colon cancer at Osaka International Cancer Institute and Yao Municipal Hospital from 2004 to 2012 were included. Clinicopathological factors were assessed in a subgroup of 298 patients (Learning Set), and the relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was evaluated as the main outcome. A statistical analysis was performed using a proportional hazards model to determine the factors associated with RFS and a nomogram was developed to predict recurrence. A second subgroup of 52 independent patients who underwent curative resection in 2012 (Validation Set) was used to validate the nomogram. The median RFS time was 4.96 years, and recurrence was observed in 35 patients. A univariate analysis revealed that a high serum CEA level, preoperative occlusion, tumor location (left-side colon), lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion were significantly correlated with RFS. These variables were used to develop the nomogram. The C-index was 0.701 in the learning set and 0.585 in the validation set. Using nomogram points, the patients were classified into low-risk, middle-risk, and high-risk categories. A recurrence prediction model was developed that integrated multiple risk factors in stage II colon cancer patients. High-risk patients were identified by the nomogram.     

Preoperative Serum CA 19-9 Level as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence after Curative Resection in Biliary Tract Cancer

Background

Complete surgical removal of biliary tract cancer (BTC) offers the only chance of cure; however, long-term survival remains very limited because of frequent recurrence after surgery. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether the preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level could predict recurrence after curative resection of BTC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with BTC and underwent curative resection. The optimal cutoff value for the preoperative serum level of CA 19-9 that predicted recurrence was determined by a ROC curve. Preoperative and postoperative risk factors for recurrence were evaluated using log-rank test.

Results

A total of 101 patients were eligible for this study. The optimal cutoff value of preoperative serum CA 19-9 level to predict recurrence was 55 U/mL. Forty-five patients (44.6%) experienced recurrence after curative resection with a median follow-up period of 28.4 months. Recurrence occurred in 33 (61.1%) of 54 patients with CA 19-9 levels ≥55 U/mL compared with only 12 (25.5%) of 47 patients with CA 19-9 levels <55 U/mL. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with baseline CA 19-9 serum levels ≥55 U/mL (hazard ratio, 3.282; 95% confidence interval, 1.684–6.395; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Elevated preoperative serum CA 19-9 was associated with a high risk of recurrence after curative resection of BTC. Different treatment plans might be needed for patients with BTC and high serum levels of CA 19-9.     

血清癌胚抗原水平对于预测非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发的意义

目的　探讨影响非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发的临床病理因素 ,了解血清癌胚抗原(CEA)检测对预测非小细胞肺癌患者术后早期复发的作用。方法　对 2 0 0 0年 9月～ 2 0 0 2年 8月收治的 93例非小细胞肺癌患者行手术治疗 ,术前行血清CEA测定 ,术后随访 1年以上 ,记录第 1次复发的时间。应用Logistic回归分析观察影响非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发的临床病理因素 ,应用受试者工作特征 (ROC)曲线进行数据分析 ,比较各危险因素预测非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发的能力。结果血清CEA水平、临床分期和肿瘤分化与非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发有关。其中CEA >10 μg/L是预测非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发较好的指标 (ROC曲线下面积 :0 84 3,95 %CI :0 72 3～ 0 96 3,P =0 0 0 0 )。结论　对于可以手术切除的非小细胞肺癌患者 ,术前应行血清CEA水平测定 ,术前血清CEA >10 μg/L提示 ,术后复发的可能性较大     

Comparative Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for Therapeutical Strategies in Colorectal Cancer

Background Prognostic information regarding the risk of postoperative tumor recurrence defined by a profile of serological, morphological and/or molecular markers can have potential value, particularly for patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage II/III who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Methods A retrospective study of 783 patients with CRC (UICC I–III) including a subgroup analysis of 116 subjects was conducted to determine preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and p53 serum levels. In addition, protein and gene expression of p53, CEA, and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) was assessed in the tumors of those patients. The values of all serological, morphological, and molecular parameters were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics for their predictive value of tumor recurrence over a mean follow-up period of 32 ± 6.2 months. Results Serum CEA but not CA 19-9 or p53 was a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival, along with UICC and T/N stage. When comparing elevated CEA, CA 19-9, and p53 serum levels with expression of the markers in the tumors, their overall expression was found to be 61.3% in the serum versus 93.5% in the tumor in analyzed patients (n = 116). In particular, all patients in UICC stages I–III who demonstrated at least three elevated markers (CEA/CA 19-9/p53) in serum and/or in the tumor presented with tumor recurrence/metastases. Conclusion Overall increased p53, CEA, and CA 19-9 serum levels and their marker expression in the tumor may be used at the time of primary tumor removal for defining patients at risk for tumor recurrence. Martin Gasser and Christiane Gerstlauer are Co-first authors     

Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Risk Factors for Recurrence

Background  The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for local and distant recurrence after intersphincteric resection (ISR) for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods  One hundred twenty consecutive patients with T1–T3 rectal cancers located 1–5 (median 3) cm from the anal verge underwent ISR. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prospectively recorded clinicopathologic parameters were performed. Results  Fifty patients had disease categorized as stage I, 21 as stage II, 46 as stage III, and 3 as stage IV on the basis of International Union Against Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging system. Median follow-up time was 3.5 years. The 3-year rates of local and distant recurrence were 6% and 13%, respectively. Univariate analysis of the risk factors for local recurrence revealed pathologic T, pathologic stage, focal dedifferentiation, microscopic resection margins, and preoperative serum CA 19-9 level to be statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed resection margin, focal dedifferentiation, and serum CA 19-9 level to be independently significant. Univariate analysis of the risk factors for distant recurrence indicated tumor location, combined resection, tumor annularity, pathologic N, lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, pathologic stage, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy to be significant. Multivariate analysis identified pathologic N, histologic grade, and tumor location to be independently significant. Conclusion  Profiles of risk factors for local and distant recurrences after ISR are different. With local recurrence, the resection margin, focal dedifferentiation, and serum CA 19-9 level are important. For distant recurrence, the lymph node status, histologic grade, and tumor location need to be taken into account.     

Analysis of Prognostic Factors Influencing Long-term Survival After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors associated with long-term outcome after liver resection for colorectal metastases. The retrospective analysis included 297 liver resections for colorectal metastases. Methods The variables considered included disease stage, differentiation grade, site and nodal metastasis of the primary tumor, number and diameter of the lesions, time from primary cancer to metastasis, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, adjuvant chemotherapy, type of resection, intraoperative ultrasonography and portal clamping use, blood loss, transfusions, complications, hospitalization, surgical margins status, and a clinical risk score (MSKCC-CRS). Results The univariate analysis revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in overall 5-year survival rates depending on the differentiation grade, preoperative CEA >5 and >200 ng/ml, diameter of the lesion >5 cm, time from primary tumor to metastases >12 months, MSKCC-CRS >2. The multivariate analysis showed three independent negative prognostic factors: G3 or G4 grade, CEA >5 ng/ml, and high MSKCC-CRS. Conclusions No single prognostic factor proved to be associated with a sufficiently disappointing outcome to exclude patients from liver resection. However, in the presence of some prognostic factors (G3–G4 differentiation, preoperative CEA >5 ng/ml, high MSKCC-CRS), enrollment of patients in trials exploring new adjuvant treatments is suggested to improve the outcome after surgery.     

Laparoscopic resection of extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a comparative analysis with open resection

Purpose  The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of open resection in patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Methods  Five hundred forty-four patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between 1996 and 2007 were included. Patients were divided into a laparoscopic surgery group (LAP, n = 170) and an open surgery group (OPEN, n = 374). Results  Morbidity requiring surgical correction was 5.8% in the LAP group and 4.8% in the OPEN group (p = 0.75). The anastomotic leakage rate was similar in both groups (5.7% in both; p = 0.98). Differences were found in preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (LAP group 4.6 ng/ml, OPEN group 7.7 ng/ml, p = 0.001), sphincter preservation (LAP group 82.9%, OPEN group 69.8%, p = 0.001), and mean distance from anal verge (LAP group 4.6 cm, OPEN group 5.2 cm, p = 0.002). Local recurrence and metastasis were similar by stage. Conclusions  The results of this study show that laparoscopic resection of extraperitoneal rectal cancer was safe and effective.     

Screening with low PSA cutoff values results in low rates of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens

BACKGROUND: In the literature, positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens, the rate of which ranges between 7% and 46%, are associated with adverse patient survival. The aim of the present study was to determine the predictive value of preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) values for the rate of positive margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy. METHODS: The study included a cohort of 845 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between October of 1993 and December of 1999. All patients were stratified in groups on the basis of their preoperative PSA values: PSA group I, 0-1.99 ng/ml; PSA group II, 2-3.99 ng/ml; PSA group III, 4-5.99 ng/ml; PSA group IV, 6-7.99 ng/ml; PSA group V, 8-9.99 ng/ml; and PSA group VI, >10 ng/ml. For each group, the pathologic stage, Gleason score, and the incidence of positive margins were analyzed. For statistical analysis, the Mann Whitney U-test was used. RESULTS: Our data show a significantly higher rate of organ-confined prostate cancers and a significantly lower rate of positive surgical margins in patients with preoperative total PSA values of less than 4 ng/ml compared with patients with higher preoperative total PSA levels. CONCLUSION: As tumor stage and surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy are important predictors of the likelihood of PSA recurrence, which necessitates additional therapy, these findings support the concept of PSA screening by using low PSA cutoff levels.