Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The identification of lymph node metastases in colorectal resection specimens is necessary for accurate tumor staging. However, routine lymph node dissection by the pathologist yields only a subset of nodes removed surgically and may not include those nodes most directly in the path of lymphatic drainage from the tumor. Intraoperative mapping of such sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been reported in cases of melanoma and breast cancer. We applied a similar method to cases of colorectal carcinoma, with emphasis on the pathology of the SLNs. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma were evaluated after intraoperative injection of 1 to 2 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye (Lymphazurin) into the peritumoral subserosa. Blue-stained lymph nodes were suture-tagged by the surgeon within minutes of the injection for identification by the pathologist, and a standard resection was performed. Designated SLNs were sectioned at 10 levels through the block; a cytokeratin immunostain (AE1) was also obtained. To evaluate the possibility that increased detection of metastases in the SLN might be solely due to increased histologic sampling, all initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 cases were sectioned also at 10 levels. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were identified intraoperatively in 82 (99%) of 83 patients and accounted for 152 (11.9%) of 1275 lymph nodes recovered, with an average of 1.9 SLNs per patient. A total of 99 positive lymph nodes (38 positive SLNs and 61 positive non-SLNs) were identified in 34 node-positive patients. The SLNs were the only site of metastasis in 17 patients (50%), while 14 patients (41%) had both positive SLNs and non-SLNs. Three patients (9%) had positive non-SLNs with negative SLNs, representing skip metastases. In patients with positive SLNs, 91 (19%) of 474 total lymph nodes and 53 (12%) of 436 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. In patients with negative SLNs, 8 (1%) of 801 total lymph nodes and 8 (1.2%) of 687 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. Multilevel sections of 330 initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 patients yielded only 2 additional positive nodes (0. 6%). All patients with positive SLNs were correctly staged by a combination of 4 representative levels through the SLN(s) together with a single cytokeratin immunostain. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative mapping of SLNs in colorectal carcinoma identifies lymph nodes likely to contain metastases. Focused pathologic evaluation of the 1 to 4 SLNs so identified can improve the accuracy of pathologic staging.     

Nodal melanocytic nevi in sentinel lymph nodes. Correlation with melanoma-associated cutaneous nevi

Melanocytic nevi occurring in lymph nodes create diagnostic difficulty by mimicking metastases. Few studies describe nodal nevi in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) excised for melanoma. We evaluated 72 cases in which patients had undergone SLN biopsy for melanoma. Lymph nodes and cutaneous melanomas were evaluated according to a standard protocol. Nodal nevi were identified in 8 patients (11%). Of these, 6 (75%) had an associated cutaneous nevus (P = .006). Of 21 patients with an associated nevus, 4 (19%) with nodal nevi had a cutaneous nevus with congenital features (P = .01). The incidence of nodal nevus correlated with a Breslow thickness greater than 2.5 mm (P = .02). Nevi were not seen in non-SLNs. Nodal nevi appear more frequently in patients with melanoma-associated cutaneous nevi, particularly if congenital features are present. The increased frequency of nodal nevi in SLNs relative to non-SLNs suggests an etiology of mechanical transport of nevus cells.     

Strategies for optimizing pathologic staging of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

Due to the extensive pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), micrometastases are frequently observed. If micrometastases are clinically relevant, the histopathologic examination of SLNs should be sensitive enough to detect them. The probability of detecting micrometastases was calculated when examining the SLN according to the current Dutch pathology protocol and strategies evaluated to optimize the chance of detection. The dimensions of 20 consecutive axillary SLNs in patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer were measured. In a mathematical model, the probability of detecting micrometastases in a SLN was calculated. Similarly, strategies to optimize the probability of detecting micrometastases were explored. When applying the pathology guidelines, the calculated probability to detect a micrometastasis was 18% for a 200-microm micrometastasis and 69% for a 2.0-mm metastasis in a median sized SLN. To detect the smallest micrometastasis in a median-sized SLN with a 95% probability, the interval between the sections must be decreased to 200 microm, and 20 levels from both halves must be examined. Given a prognostic significance of micrometastases, our current pathology guidelines are not sensitive enough. The number of sections should be increased, while the interval between cuts should be no more than 200 microm.     

The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas

AIMS: The reliable identification of node negative colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) has often been linked to the histological examination of a minimum number of lymph nodes. The sizes of the lymph nodes, their metastatic status, and their number were investigated to establish whether these parameters are related, and whether their relation could help in determining the adequacy of staging. METHODS: One thousand three hundred and thirty four negative lymph nodes, 189 metastatic lymph nodes, and 43 pericolonic/perirectal tumour deposits measuring > or = 3 mm from 60 node positive and from 63 node negative patients with CRC were assessed for size. RESULTS: The mean size (SD) of these structures was 4.5 (2.7) mm. The lymph nodes were significantly larger in the CRCs with metastatic nodes (4.7 v 4.3 mm). Involved nodes were significantly larger than negative nodes (6.3 v 4.2 mm), despite the fact that the largest node was < or = 5 mm in one third of node positive CRCs. The examination of the seven largest nodes could have adequately staged 97% of node positive CRCs and 98% of all CRCs. CONCLUSIONS: The nodal staging of CRCs is dependent not only on the number of lymph nodes investigated, but also on qualitative features of the lymph nodes assessed, including their size. Lymph nodes are not equivalent and any study neglecting this fact will give grounds for error in the recommendation of a minimum number of nodes for the reliable determination of node negative CRCs. Although pathologists should aim to recover all nodes, a negative nodal status based on only seven nodes can be reliable.     

False-positive cells in sentinel lymph nodes

Melanoma sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) are carefully evaluated to maximize sensitivity. Examination includes hematoxylin and eosin (H+E) stained sections at multiple levels through the node, with subsequent immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for melanocytic markers if H+E sections are negative for melanoma. However, not all IHC-positive cells in SLN are metastatic melanoma, as evidenced by the presence of MART-1 positive cells in SLN from breast cancer patients with no history of melanoma (so-called 'false-positive' cells). These 'false-positive cells' could be nodal nevus, non-melanocytic cells with cross-reacting antigenic determinants, phagocytic cells containing melanocyte antigens, or possibly melanocytes or melanocyte stem cells liberated at the time of biopsy of the cutaneous melanoma. Examination of SLN requires careful correlation of H+E and IHC findings.     

Pathology of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma

As a concept sentinel lymph node biopsy seems attractive in that it attempts to identify the first lymph node, rather than the nearest node, draining a particular anatomic area where a tumour has arisen. Pathological assessment can then indicate whether metastases are present and the procedure is either a strong prognostic indicator or possibly therapeutic in itself. These comments apply to any tumour type, but with melanoma the pathological procedure is more problematic and any benefits above prognosis and staging are not universally accepted. The procedure does give accurate staging without the extra morbidity of regional node dissection and many patients gain psychological support from the information gained.     

Axillary staging of breast cancer and the sentinel node

Pathological aspects of axillary nodal staging of breast cancer and in particular sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are reviewed. SLN biopsy seems an almost ideal staging procedure because it has both high accuracy and a low false negative rate. It may also allow a cost effective use of more sensitive methods of metastasis detection. However, the biological relevance of metastases detected only by modern tools remains to be elucidated. This review focuses on standard axillary staging and the histopathological investigation of SLNs, with emphasis on the intraoperative setting. Future trends including ancillary studies, quality control issues, prediction of non-SLN involvement, and suggestions concerning the minimum requirements for the histology of axillary SLNs are also discussed.     

Assessment of sentinel lymph nodes for breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is standard of care for assessment of lymph node stage in early breast cancer in patients with clinically negative nodes. The limited clinical significance of low volume axillary metastatic disease has led to changes in surgical management of the axilla with a shift away from routine axillary lymph node dissection if the sentinel lymph node is found to contain metastatic tumour. This has led to a decrease in the use of intraoperative assessment of sentinel nodes. Specimen handling and histological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes is described, with the emphasis on identification of macrometastatic disease defined as metastases greater than 2 mm. Routine levels and/or cytokeratin immunohistochemistry is not recommended. The increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and growing evidence that sentinel lymph node biopsy is safe and accurate in this setting, including in patients with proven node positive disease, has resulted in new challenges in the interpretation of these specimens.     

Evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an accurate method for the detection of axillary metastases in cases of breast carcinoma and is of value as a replacement for axillary dissection. There is variation, however, in the methods and protocols used for the histopathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes, standardisation of which will be required if results of sentinel lymph node analysis are to be used to stratify patients into prognostic groups. The significance of micrometastases, isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and the value of immunohistochemistry are also matters for further definition. In this Expert Opinion we present reviews from two authors, providing American and European perspectives on the approach to sentinel lymph node evaluation.     

Fast and sensitive immunodetection of carcinoma cells in sentinel nodes

In a number of clinical situations, especially in the context of the recent sentinel node concept, lymph-node involvement has to be determined intraoperatively. Since serious and dependable decisions are to be made according to the result of this examination, the most reliable method for the detection of tumour cells should be applied. We and others have shown previously that routine histological examination underestimates lymph-node metastases, and that immunohistochemistry (IHC) significantly improves the accuracy of staging. However, IHC has so far been difficult to apply to the intraoperative examination of cryosections since it has required too much time. We have developed a novel modification of IHC for the rapid detection of metastases of carcinomas in cryosections from lymph nodes. It is based on a unique directly labelled cytokeratin antibody, immunofluorescence, and a specially devised staining solution. This one-step staining procedure can be performed within 10 min. At the same time, its sensitivity is very high. Single tumour cells can easily be detected, and background staining is very low. The high sensitivity could result in a markedly improved reliability of sentinel node-based decisions.     

Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important component in the staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM). The medical literature provides only limited information regarding melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) histology. This report details the specific histological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and highlights some key factors in evaluating SLNs for melanoma. METHODS: From 281 SLNB cases between June 1998 and May 2002, 79 consecutive cases of SLN biopsies positive for metastases from CM were retrospectively reviewed. The important characteristics of the SLNs and the metastatic foci are described. RESULTS: The median size of positive SLNs was 17 mm (range, 5-38). SLNs had a median of two metastatic foci (range, 1-11), with the largest foci being a median of 1.1 mm in size (range, 0.05-24). S-100 and HMB-45 staining was positive in 100% and 92% of the detected metastatic foci, respectively. The metastatic melanoma cells were epithelioid, spindled, and mixed in 86%, 5%, and 9% of cases. Metastatic foci were most often (86%) found in the subcapsular region of the SLN. Benign naevic cells were found coexisting in 14% of positive SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: Staining for S100 is more sensitive than HMB-45 (100% v 92%), but HMB-45 staining helped to distinguish benign naevic cells from melanoma. The subcapsular region was crucial in SLN evaluation, because it contained the metastases in 86% of cases. Evaluation of the subcapsular space should not be compromised by cautery artefacts or incomplete excision of the SLN.     

Mapping metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer

Localization of metastases within the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of breast cancer has not been studied. Forty SLNs from 36 patients with operable primary breast cancers were identified by means of lymphatic mapping with patent blue dye. The junction between the patent blue-stained lymphatic vessel draining the tumor and the SLN was labeled with alcian blue. Metastases within the serially sectioned SLNs were assigned to the alcian blue-labeled side, to the opposite side of the virtually halved nodes, or both. Eight SLNs were negative for metastasis. Eleven SLNs had metastases only in the blue half. Only 4 cases had larger metastases in the nonblue half. Metastases are more likely to be located in the vicinity of the inflow junction of the identifiable lymphatic draining the tumor and the SLN. This should be considered when SLNs are examined, especially when they are halved for different studies.     

Rapid immunohistochemistry of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic melanoma

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is performed on patients with malignant melanoma (MM) to assess the need for selective complete lymphadenectomy. Melanoma metastasis to regional lymph nodes is an important prognostic indicator in patients with MM. This study assesses the sensitivity and specificity of rapid immunohistochemistry (RIHC) in intraoperative delineation of melanoma metastasis to SLN. RIHC for S-100 protein, HMB45, and a melanoma marker cocktail (melan A, HMB45, and tyrosinase) was performed on 71 SLNs obtained from 28 patients with MM. Frozen sections (6 micro thick) on plus slides were fixed for 2 to 3 minutes in cold acetone and then stored at -70 degrees C. The EnVision kit (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for rapid immunohistochemistry (RIHC) on frozen tissue sections was used, and the staining technique took 19 minutes. Together with preparation of the frozen sections and fixation in acetone, immunostained slides were available in approximately 25 minutes. Of the 71 SNLs examined, 7 showed melanoma metastasis in permanent sections. RIHC of frozen sections detected metastatic melanoma in 6 SLNs, with a sensitivity of 86% for HMB45 and 71% for S-100 protein and the melanoma cocktail and a specificity of 97% for HMB45 and 100% for S-100 and the melanoma cocktail. We conclude that RIHC for HMB45, S-100 protein, and the melanoma cocktail may help detect melanoma metastasis in SLN intraoperatively, leading to total lymph node dissection and obviating the need for 2 surgical procedures. Section folds and background stain can make interpretation difficult. Intraoperative time constraints require a more rapid technique. A recent consensus group has discouraged frozen-section examination of SLN.