Diagnostic criteria of white coat hypertension (WCH): consequences for the implications of WCH for target organs

In a sample comprising 51 normotensive subjects and 51 subjects with in-clinic arterial hypertension [blood pressures (BPs) > or = 140/90 mmHg), we investigated the prevalence of target organ damage [left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and retinal vasculopathy] in white coat hypertension (WCH) groups defined using: (a) the "optimal ambulatory BP" criterion of the Seventh International Consensus Conference (in-clinic BPs >140/90 mmHg, daytime mean BPs < 130/80 mmHg) and (b) the "normal ambulatory BP" criterion proposed in 1997 by Verdecchia and co-workers (in-clinic BPs >140/ 90 mmHg, daytime mean BPs < 135/85 mmHg), and we compared the results with those obtained for the normotensive group and for a WCH group defined as in a 1996 study of the same data. We found that the newer criteria did not alter the conclusions reached in 1996: namely, that WCH constitutes a state of risk intermediate between normotension and sustained hypertension, which demands in-depth evaluation and active monitoring, if not immediate therapy. We also found that when the WCH group was defined as those patients with in-clinic BPs > or = 140/90 mmHg and 24-h mean BPs < 121/78 mmHg, the prevalence of target organ damage was similar to that found in the control group. We conclude that if WCH status is to imply absence of elevated risk of target organ damage, then the ambulatory BP threshold defining WCH should be lower than the upper limit of ambulatory BPs among subjects who are normotensive in the clinic. The desirability of predicting target organ damage in both hypertensive and normotensive subjects using criteria combining in-clinic BPs, daytime mean ambulatory BPs and night-time mean ambulatory BPs is suggested.     

Aortic Distensibility in Normotensive, Untreated and Treated Hypertensive Patients

Background: Compared with normotensive subjects, untreated hypertensive patients show a decrease of their aortic distensibility. Whether antihypertensive treatment, by reducing blood pressure and changing functional and/or structural abnormalities of the arterial wall, may prevent or reverse the arterial damage due to the accelerated ageing process remains unclear. The objective of the present study was to determine, using a cross-sectional approach, whether aortic distensibility as measured by pulse wave velocity, in treated hypertensive patients whose diastolic blood pressure had been normalised for several months, was significantly improved over that of untreated hypertensive patients.

Methods: Carotid femoral pulse wave velocity was measured in 124 normotensive subjects and 388 hypertensive patients. The latter group included 164 treated patients with well controlled diastolic blood pressure and 224 untreated hypertensive subjects. The three groups did not differ in other cardiovascular risk factors.

Results: In each group there was a significant relationship between age and pulse wave velocity. When compared with untreated hypertensives, treated hypertensives with well controlled diastolic blood pressure had significantly lower blood pressure and pulse wave velocity according to age. However, although diastolic blood pressure of well controlled hypertensives was not significantly different from that of normotensive subjects, the aortic distensibility of the controlled hypertensives remained reduced showing two characteristics: a faster increase in pulse wave velocity with age and a negative relationship with HDL-cholesterol.

Conclusion: These results suggest that long-term antihypertensive treatment and control of blood pressure using only diastolic blood pressure criteria may not fully reverse arterial alteration associated with hypertensive vascular disease.     

Target organ damage in "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension"

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated (i) the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients who had never been treated earlier with antihypertensive medication, and (ii) the association of these conditions with target organ damage. METHODS: A total of 1,535 consecutive patients underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurements, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography, and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Subjects who showed normotension or hypertension on the basis of both office and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurement were characterized as having confirmed normotension or confirmed hypertension, respectively. WCH was defined as office hypertension with ambulatory normotension, and MH as office normotension with ambulatory hypertension. RESULTS: WCH was found in 17.9% and MH in 14.5% of the subjects. The prevalence of WCH was significantly higher in subjects with obesity, while the prevalence of MH was significantly higher in normal-weight subjects. The confirmed hypertensive subjects as well as the masked hypertensive subjects had significantly higher left ventricular mass (LVM) (corrected for body surface area) and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) than the confirmed normotensive subjects did (108.9 +/- 30.6, 107.1 +/- 29.1 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2) and 0.68 +/- 0.16, 0.68 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm, respectively, P < 0.005). White coat hypertensive subjects did not have a significantly higher LVM index than confirmed normotensive subjects (101.5 +/- 25.9 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2)); they tended to have higher cIMT than the confirmed normotensive subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm). CONCLUSIONS: WCH and MH are common conditions in patients who visit hypertension outpatient clinics. Confirmed hypertension and MH are accompanied by increased LVM index and cIMT, even after adjusting for other risk factors.     

Arterial hypertension increases left ventricular mass: role of tight blood pressure control

In middle-age hypertensives from the Gubbio Population Study, we evaluated the relationship between blood pressure (BP) control over a long time and the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A population survey was performed in 1982-1985 and repeated in 1989-1992. During the second survey, subjects in the age range 40-60 years were invited to undergo an M-mode echocardiographic examination. A total of 487 subjects who participated in both surveys are included in the present analysis. Some of them (294) were normotensive (Group 1), 110 were hypertensive but had never taken antihypertensive drugs (Group 2), 47 hypertensives on drugs were in good BP control (Group 3) and 36 hypertensives on drugs had uncontrolled hypertension (Group 4). BP values at the 1989-1992 examination were, respectively, 122/77, 145/86, 124/78 and 153/91 mmHg, while 7 years earlier were 122/77, 133/84, 136/85 and 152/95 mmHg. Despite normal BP levels in Group 3, left ventricular mass index (LVMi, g/m(2.7)) was greater than in normotensives (42.4+/-10, 46.6+/-13, 47.0+/-10, 51.9+/-15 g/m(2.7)). Accordingly, the prevalence of LVH (LVMi >51 g/m(2.7)) was 18, 26.4, 36.7 and 50% in groups 1-4, respectively. The 193 hypertensives were, thereafter, divided according to BP control (ie <140/90 mmHg) on both surveys (1983-1985 and 1989-1992): 27 hypertensives with optimal BP levels on both visits also had a ventricular mass similar to normotensives and significantly lower than the other hypertensives (LVMi 44.6+/-11.6 vs 48.5+/-13.2, P<0.001). In conclusion, these findings indicate that hypertensive patients with BP values at levels similar to those in normotensives for a long period do not increase their left ventricular mass in comparison to subjects with normal BP levels.     

Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

Left ventricular changes in isolated office hypertension: a blood pressure-matched comparison with normotension and sustained hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Isolated office (IO) hypertension is a benign condition according to some researchers, whereas others believe it is associated with cardiovascular abnormalities and increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to compare morphofunctional characteristics of the left ventricle (LV) in IO hypertensive subjects, normotensive subjects (hereafter, hypertensives and normotensives), and never-treated sustained hypertensives. The 3 groups were matched not only by age, sex, and body mass index but also by clinic blood pressure (BP) (IO hypertensives and sustained hypertensives) and daytime BP (IO hypertensives and normotensives). METHODS: We enrolled 42 IO hypertensives (clinic BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP < or = 130/80 mm Hg), 42 sustained hypertensives (clinic BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP > or = 140 and/or 90 mm Hg) and 42 normotensives (clinic BP < 135 and/or 85 mm Hg and daytime BP < or = 130/80 mm Hg). Left ventricular morphologic features and function were assessed using digitized M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Compared with normotensives, IO hypertensives had significantly thicker LV walls, increased LV mass, reduced diastolic function, increased prevalence of LV hypertrophy, and preclinical diastolic dysfunction. Sustained hypertensives, compared with IO hypertensives, had significantly thicker LV wall, higher LV mass, and lower diastolic function, whereas the prevalence of LV hypertrophy and preclinical diastolic dysfunction was greater than in IO hypertensives, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing matched BP groups, IO hypertensives have LV morphofunctional characteristics considerably different from normotensives and qualitatively similar to sustained hypertensives. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that IO hypertension should not be considered as simply a benign condition.     

Headache: Prevalence and relationship with office or ambulatory blood pressure in a general population sample (the Vobarno Study)

The association of headache and arterial hypertension is still controversial, although headache is usually considered a symptom of hypertension. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of headache in a general population sample and the relationship with arterial hypertension, as diagnosed by office measurements and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure (BP). Patients and methods. In the randomized sample of the Vobarno population, 301 subjects (126 males, 175 females, age range 35-50 years) underwent a structured standardized headache questionnaire, office and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. Results. Prevalence of lifetime headache and of migraine was greater in females than in males. Office and 24-h BP values did not differ between subjects without headache and subjects with headache. No differences in headache prevalence (58% vs 55%), migraine prevalence (32% vs 28%) and use of analgesic drugs in the presence of headache (82% vs 78%) were observed between hypertensive patients (93.5% newly diagnosed, 6.5% treated) and normotensive subjects. Conclusions. In a general population sample, hypertension (diagnosed by office and/or 24-h BP) is not associated with headache.     

Assessment of self-monitoring of blood pressure in the diagnosis of isolated clinic hypertension

BACKGROUND: There are no studies assessing cardiovascular morbidity, morality in patients with isolated clinical hypertension (ICH) with self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM). OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of SBPM in the diagnosis of ICH. METHODS: Cohort study. New hypertensive and normotensive patients 15-75 years, without cardiovascular events history. VARIABLES: Oriented anamnesis hypertension; blood pressure measurements (BP): clinical BP, SBPM and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM); evaluation of target organ damage (TOD); electrocardiogram; retinography and microalbuminuria (MA). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients, 95 hypertensive (62.1% males; mean age 59.08+/-16.8 years), 40 normotensive (37.5% males; mean are 56.32+/-10.22 years). BP measurements (mmHG) in normotensives vs hypertensives: clinical BP, 125.36/76.74 vs 149.81/87.86 mmHg (p<0.0001) and SPPM, 114.90/69.96 vs 142.06/86.31 (p<0.0001). Twenty-four-hour ABPM: 135.41/81/81.74. Prevalence of TOD in hypertensive: 23.10% left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), sustained hypertension (SH): clinic BP, 149.88/86.34 vs 152.51/89.55 (p>0.10); SBPM: 147.895/88.95 vs 128.17/79 (p<0.0001) and ABPM, 141.72/88.22 vs 131.66/80 (p=0.053 for systolic). TOD in SH vs ICH: LVH, 24.6% vs 19.2% (p=0.814); exudates or haemorrhages, 7.7% vs 9.8% (p=0.580). The risk of an occurrence of any TOD in ICH patients is lower for 125/80 (OR=2.5). CONCLUSIONS: VAMPAHICA will provide information about value SBPM in the diagnosis of ICH. Advanced retinopathy is relative frequent in ICH patients. If TOD is accepted as a surrogate endpoint, the diagnostic values of ICH will be probably decreased.     

Left ventricular hypertrophy in isolated and dual masked hypertension

Masked hypertension (MH) is defined as normal office blood pressure (BP) and elevated ambulatory BP (ABP) or home BP or both. This study assessed the association of MH (ie, isolated home, isolated ABP and dual MH) with echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The present analysis of the PAMELA study included 1087 untreated and treated participants with normal office BP and a measurable LV mass (LVM). A total of 193 individuals (17.7%) had any MH (ie, normal office BP, elevated ABP or home BP or both), 48 had dual MH (25%), 62 isolated ambulatory MH (32%), and 83 isolated home MH (43%). Average LVM indexed to body surface area was superimposable in the three MH phenotypes (being the largest difference between groups <3 g/m²) and significantly higher than in true normotensives. This was also for the LVH prevalence that varied across the MH subgroups in a narrow range (from 8.3% to 10.8%). In conclusion, individuals from the general population with isolated MH, in which either home or ABP was elevated, exhibited an increased risk of LVH similar to that entailed by dual MH. Our findings add the notion both home and ABP measurements are useful to more accurately assess the risk of LVH associated with MH in the community.     

Left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients with good blood pressure control outside the clinic,but poor clinic blood pressure control

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in treated patients with good blood pressure (BP) control during multiple home BP (HBP) measurements and during 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), but with unsatisfactory BP control in the clinic. These patients were compared with treated hypertensives whose BP was well controlled under the three circumstances. METHODS: Seventy-two treated consecutive patients (group I, age 56 +/- 10 years) with clinic BP values > or = 140/90 mmHg, and a difference between clinic and self-measured HBP > 10 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and/or > 20 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), underwent the following procedures: (1) clinic BP measurement; (2) routine diagnostic work-up; (3) HBP monitoring; (4) 24-h ABPM; (5) echocardiography. Thirty-five hypertensive patients with satisfactory BP control according to clinic (< 140/90 mmHg), HBP (< or = 131/82 mmHg) and ABP criteria (< or = 125/79 mmHg) were included as the control group (group II, age 55 +/- 9 years). RESULTS: In group I, 33 subjects out of the 72 (46%) with clinic BP > 140/90 mmHg had BP values controlled outside the clinic (23 according to HBP criteria and 22 according to ABP criteria). The prevalence of LVH (LV mass index > 134 g/m2 in men and > 110 g/m2 in women) was significantly higher in these patients (15.1 versus 2.8%, P < 0.01) than in group II (BP also controlled in the clinic), despite the fact that HBP and ABP were reduced to similar levels in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide evidence that treated hypertensive patients with good BP control at home or during ambulatory monitoring, but incomplete BP control in the clinic, have more pronounced cardiac alterations than patients with both clinic and out of the clinic BP control. This finding offers a new piece of information about the diagnostic value of BP measurement in the clinic to assess BP control during antihypertensive treatment.     

Is plasma cardiotrophin-1 a marker of hypertensive heart disease?

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate whether plasma concentration of cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), a cytokine that induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and stimulates cardiac fibroblasts, is related to hypertensive heart disease, as defined by the presence of echocardiographically assessed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS: The study was performed in 31 normotensive subjects and 111 patients with never-treated essential hypertension (54 without LVH and 57 with LVH). Causes of LVH other than hypertension were excluded after a complete medical workup. A novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed to measure plasma CT-1. RESULTS: Plasma CT-1 was increased (P < 0.001) in hypertensives compared with normotensives. The value of CT-1 was higher (P < 0.001) in hypertensives with LVH than in hypertensives without LVH. Some 31% of patients without LVH exhibited values of CT-1 above the upper normal limit in normotensives. A direct correlation was found between CT-1 and left ventricular mass index (r = 0.319, P < 0.001) in all subjects. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that a cutoff of 39 fmol/ml for CT-1 provided 75% specificity and 70% sensitivity for predicting LVH with a relative risk of 6.21 (95% confidence interval, 2.95 to 13.09). CONCLUSIONS: These results show an association between LVH and the plasma concentration of CT-1 in essential hypertension. Although preliminary, these findings suggest that the determination of CT-1 may be an easy and reliable method for the initial screening and diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease.     

Out-of-office blood pressure in children and adolescents: disparate findings by using home or ambulatory monitoring

BACKGROUND: The validity of home blood pressure (HBP) measurements in children has not been evaluated, although in clinical practice such measurements are being used. This study compares HBP, with clinic (CBP) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in children and adolescents. METHODS: Fifty-five children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years were evaluated with CBP (three visits), HBP (6 days), and daytime ABP. Mean age was 12.3 +/- 2.9 (SD) years, 33 boys. According to the Task Force CBP criteria, 26 were hypertensives, 6 had high-normal BP (hypertensive group), and 23 were normotensives (normotensive group). RESULTS: In the hypertensive group, CBP was 130.8 +/- 7.6/72.5 +/- 8.1 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic), HBP 118.9 +/- 6.3/73.7 +/- 6.7, and ABP 130.8 +/- 8.1/75.5 +/- 8.3. In the normotensive group, CBP was 112.8 +/- 8/63.1 +/- 6.3, HBP 106.7 +/- 8.4/67.2 +/- 5.2, and ABP 123.9 +/- 7.2/72 +/- 4.3. Strong correlations (P < .001) were observed between CBP-HBP (r = 0.73/0.57, systolic/diastolic), CBP-ABP (r = 0.59/0.49), and HBP-ABP (r = 0.72/0.66). In normotensive subjects, ABP was higher than both CBP and HBP for systolic and diastolic BP (P < .001). Furthermore, systolic HBP was lower than CBP (P < .01), whereas the opposite was true for diastolic BP (P < .05). In hypertensive subjects systolic HBP was lower than both CBP and ABP (P < .001), whereas CBP did not differ from ABP. For diastolic BP no differences were found among measurement methods. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, in contrast to adults in whom HBP is close to the levels of daytime ABP, in children and adolescents HBP appears to be significantly lower than daytime ABP. Until more data become available, caution is needed in the interpretation of HBP in children and adolescents.     

GENDER DIFFERENCE IN THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG HYPERLEPTINEMIA,HYPERINSULINEMIA, AND HYPERTENSION

Studies reveals that plasma leptin levels (LEP) in females are higher than those in males, and that LEP in hypertensive subjects are higher than those in BMI-matched normotensive subjects. To investigate the relationships among LEP, blood pressure (BP) and insulin sensitivity, we studied these relationships in 133 Japanese males and 263 females. LEP were positively correlated with BP, body mass index, body fat mass (FM) and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Regression analysis in which age and FM were adjusted showed LEP were associated with BP and HOMA. Even with adjustment by age, FM and HOMA, LEP were still positively correlated BP in males. LEP in insulin-resistant hypertensives was significantly higher than those in insulin-sensitive hypertensives, in insulin-sensitive normotensives and in insulin-resistant normotensives in males. However, in females, a significantly higher LEP was observed in insulin-resistant subjects than in insulin-sensitive subjects regardless of hypertension. These data suggest that it would be sexual difference in the relationships among hyperleptinemia, hyperinsulinemia and hypertension.     

Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients without and with blood pressure control: data from the PAMELA population. Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni

Previous studies have shown that in the population, only a minority of treated hypertensive patients achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Whether and to what extent this inadequate control has reflection on hypertension-related organ damage has never been systematically examined. In 2051 subjects belonging to the PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni) Study population, we measured office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory BP values, together with echocardiographic left ventricular mass and wall thickness. Based on the fraction on antihypertensive treatment and on measurements of increased or normal office, home, or 24-hour ambulatory BP values, subjects were classified as normotensives, untreated hypertensives, treated hypertensives with inadequate BP control, and treated hypertensives with effective BP control. Compared with values in the normotensive group, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular wall thickness, and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy were markedly increased not only in untreated hypertensive patients but also in treated hypertensives with inadequate BP control. Echocardiographic abnormalities were less in treated hypertensives with BP control than in patients with inadequate BP control, but values were still clearly greater than in normotensive subjects. This was the case regardless whether BP control was assessed by office, home, and/or ambulatory values. Our data provide evidence that in the hypertensive fraction of the population, cardiac structural alterations can be frequently found in both the presence and absence of antihypertensive treatment. They also imply that even effective treatment of hypertension does not allow complete reversal of the cardiac organ damage characterizing high BP states.     

Is there a relationship between left ventricular mass and plasma glucose and lipids independent of body mass index? Results of the Gubbio Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The association between left ventricular (LV) mass (M) and variables described as features of the insulin resistance syndrome, such as obesity and measures o lipid and carbohydrate metabolisms, has been reported in hypertensives. The aim of the present study was to investigate in a large, population based group of non hypertensive people, the prevalence of LV hypertrophy (H) and the relationship of LVM with some of the variables described in the insulin resistance syndrome, independently of obesity. For this reason we investigated the normotensive subjects in the age range 45-54 yrs (n = 435) of the total population of participants in the Gubbio Population Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serum lipids, cholesterol (Chol), triglyceride (Tg), HDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood pressure (BP), body weight and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) was calculated; LVM was assessed by M-mode echocardiography. Using a normalization criterion not related to body weight (g/m2.7) and the cut-off of 49.2 g/m2.7 for men and 46.7 g/m2.7 for women, LVH was found in 25% of the sample whilst, when LVM was corrected by body surface area (cut-off 116 g/m2 for men and 104 g/m2 for women), the prevalence of LVH was quite lower (10.3%). In the univariate analyses LVMi was closely related to BP, BMI and metabolic variables whilst in the multivariate analysis only BP, BMI, and age were detected as independent predictors of LVMi. When the sample was divided into obese and non-obese subjects on the basis of BMI (cut-off 30 kg/m2), no difference in metabolic variables was seen between subjects with and without LVH within each BMI class. Regarding left ventricular geometry, RWT was positively related to triglycerides and blood glucose and inversely to HDL-chol. CONCLUSIONS: The present study in the middle age normotensive sample of the general population of Gubbio extends to normotensives the relationship between left ventricular mass and metabolic parameters already seen in hypertensives. BMI seems to account for most of the increases in LVM since the prevalence of LVH, which was definitely high when LVM was not normalized to body weight, fell to approximately 4% when the influence of body weight was excluded. Moreover differences in metabolic values between subjects with and without LVH disappeared when the subjects were stratified by BMI. Left ventricular geometry, on the other hand, seems to be related to some metabolic variables.     

Losartan controlled blood pressure and reduced left ventricular hypertrophy but did not alter arrhythmias in hypertensive men with preserved systolic function

The effect of antihypertensive therapy on arrhythmias is controversial. An initial study in patients with chronic heart failure indicated that losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, may possess antiarrhythmic properties. However, the effect of AT1 receptor antagonists on arrhythmias of subjects with good systolic function has never been evaluated. Thirty-nine men with primary hypertension (18 without left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH], and 21 with LVH, aged 48.2 +/-8.6 and 50.5 +/-6.0 years, respectively), 15 healthy normotensive subjects (47.9 +/-8.5 years), and 14 highly trained athletes (34.1 +/-1.6 years) were studied. Transthoracic echocardiography and 24-hour Holter ambulatory monitoring were performed at baseline (without treatment). Hypertensive patients underwent the same examinations after 8 months of losartan administration. The prevalence and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias, and the frequency of supraventricular arrhythmias were increased in hypertensive patients with LVH compared to normotensive controls and athletes, at baseline. A similar significant reduction of blood pressure (BP) was noted in both groups of patients (p < 0.001). The LVH was reduced in hypertensives with LVH (the left ventricular mass index by 12%, the interventricular septum by 8.1%, the posterior wall by 7%, all p < 0.01). However, the arrhythmias did not change in either group of patients, even if all hypertensives were considered as 1 group. In conclusion, an 8-month course with losartan was effective in lowering BP and reducing LVH. However, the increased arrhythmias, which were registered in hypertensive patients with LVH at baseline, did not change.     

Relationship between aortic stiffness and cardiovascular risk factors in a population of normotensives, white-coat normotensives, white-coat hypertensives, sustained hypertensives and diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and office and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and other cardiovascular risk factors and to determine the discriminatory value of PWV in a large population including normotensive subjects (NT), white-coat normotensives (masked hypertension) (WCNT), and white-coat hypertensives (WCHT) compared to a group of treated and untreated hypertensive patients. METHODS: The study population included a total of 688 subjects aged from 18 to 80 years, with no previous cardiovascular events, who underwent 24 h ABP monitoring, biochemical evaluation and determination of PWV and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Subjects were classified as true normotensives (NT, n=132; normal office and ABP values), WCNT (n=39; office BP < 140/90 and daytime BP > or =135 or > or =85 mmHg), WCHT (n=87; office BP > or =140 or > or =90 and daytime BP < 135/85 mmHg). Untreated (UT-HT, n=154) and treated (T-HT, n=171) hypertensive patients and type 2 diabetic patients (DM, n=102) were also studied. RESULTS: Values of PWV (m/s) in all groups were, in ascending order: NT (8.9 +/- 0.2) < WCHT (9.9 +/- 0.2) < T-HT (11.4 +/- 0.2) = WCNT (11.5 +/- 0.4) < UT-HT (11.9 +/- 0.3) < DM (12.6 +/- 0.4) (ANOVA, p = 0.043), and of LVMI (g/m2): NT (59 +/- 2) = WCHT (63 +/- 2) < WCNT (73 +/- 3) = T-HT (75 +/- 3) = UT-HT (77 +/- 3) < DM (84 +/- 4) (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The percentage of subjects with PWV values below the median (10.7 m/s) was higher (p < 0.02) in NT (81.8%) and WCHT (72.6%) than in UT-HT (49.2%), T-HT (43.6%), WCNT (47.6%) and DM (27.7%). In multiple regression analysis, taking PWV as the dependent variable, age (all groups), 24h systolic BP (UT-HT, T-HT, WCNT and DM) and 24h diastolic BP (NT and WCHT) were the variables that independently influenced the PWV value. CONCLUSIONS: Higher values of PWV occur in clinical situations associated with higher cardiovascular risk. This is in agreement with risk stratification based on ABP values but not on office BP values. Lower PWV and LVMI values occur in NT and WCHT subjects, supporting a low cardiovascular risk in these groups. By contrast, higher PWV values were associated with higher ABP values in DM, hypertensive patients and white-coat normotensives, i.e. clinical situations that are associated with higher cardiovascular risk, who in the present study also exhibited higher LVMI than subjects with normal ABP values.     

Predictors of controlled ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients with uncontrolled office blood pressure.

Although some treated hypertensive patients have controlled 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) despite their uncontrolled office blood pressure (BP), the factors relating to the control of 24-h ABP remain unknown. We conducted a study to assess 24-h ABP and its association with other cardiovascular risk factors, including echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), in elderly hypertensive patients (n =41) with uncontrolled office BP (>140/90 mmHg) during long-term medication. Although a majority of the patients had isolated elevation of office systolic BP (SBP), there was no significant relationship between office SBP and 24-h SBP, and about half of the patients had controlled 24-h ABP (125+/-8/69+/-6 mmHg). Patients with controlled 24-h ABP (125+/-8/69+/-6 mmHg) had similar office BP (150+/-6/77+/-5 vs. 150+/-7/79+/-7 mmHg), but lower left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (123+/-34 vs. 156+/-34 g/m(2)) and body mass index (BMI) (24.4+/-2.1 vs. 26.4+/-3.6 kg/m(2)) compared with those with uncontrolled 24-h ABP (149+/-13/78+/-7 mmHg). Multivariate analysis showed that LVMI and BMI were independently associated with controlled 24-h ABP, and the control status of 24-h ABP was highly dependent on the presence of LVH and obesity. Therefore, absence of LVH and obesity may be useful for predicting the level of control of 24-h ABP in treated patients whose office BP is uncontrolled without ABP measurements.     

From treatment to organ damage; a 5-year follow-up study of ambulatory blood pressure in essential hypertension. Diversity between development of left ventricular hypertrophy and urinary albumin excretion

This study aimed to assess blood pressure (BP) profile, BP control, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) in urine after 5 years of antihypertensive treatment in subjects with newly diagnosed essential hypertension. Fifty-four subjects were included and prescribed calcium-channel blocker in monotherapy during an 8-week period, and later 46 subjects (34 men, 12 women, 53.1+/-8.6 years) attended a 5-year follow-up visit at the hypertension clinic. They underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), ECG and ACR at baseline and after 5 years. Echocardiography performed after 5 years revealed LVH in 54% of the subjects, while there was no change in Cornell product, an ECG criterion for LVH. BP control assessed by office BP was 33%, and only 20% using 24-h ABP. Night-time fall in BP was significantly attenuated from 13.2+/-5.9% to 10.7+/-6.0%, p = 0.01 for systolic BP and from 13.3+/-6.9% to 9.8+/-6.8%, p = 0.004 for diastolic BP. The number of dippers decreased after 5 years, but this did not reach statistical significance. In contrast to the lack of change in Cornell product, there was a significant decrease in ACR, and 93% of the subjects had ACR<1.5 mg/mmol after 5 years compared with 57% at baseline (p<0.001). Thus, ABPM should be encouraged in the follow-up of all hypertensive subjects as it reveals better inadequate BP control than office BP and gives information about night-time fall, as this may explain the high prevalence of LVH. The diversity in development of LVH and ACR during antihypertensive treatment needs to be verified.     

Variability of diurnal changes in ambulatory blood pressure and nocturnal dipping status in untreated hypertensive and normotensive subjects

An absent or diminished blood pressure (BP) fall during sleep (so-called "nondipping") has been associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular complications, but the long-term reproducibility of dipper status and the relationship between diurnal changes in BP and perceived sleep quality have not been previously documented in untreated hypertensive patients. Ambulatory BP (ABP) and dipping status were examined in 79 subjects (69 hypertensives and 10 normotensives) at 0, 6, and 12 months. Fifty-six percent of subjects had no change in their dipping status, the majority (53%) dipping normally on all three occasions. However, 44% of patients had variable dipping status, and normal nighttime dipping in BP was observed more often when patients perceived their sleep quality to be good during the period of ABP recording. These results highlight significant intrasubject variability in the diurnal fluctuations in ABP and dipper status, which may in part reflect day-to-day variations in sleep disturbance during ABP monitoring. Classifying hypertensive patients into dippers or nondippers on the basis of a single ABP recording is unreliable and potentially misleading.