Utilizing insider-outsider research teams in qualitative research

Teams including members from both inside and outside the organization being studied make valuable contributions. A team configuration including both insiders and outsiders is highly effective because variations in the experience history of researchers on the team broaden the available perspectives and maximize the potential interpretations of observed behaviors. An insider-outsider research team consisting of university faculty and nurses at two psychiatric hospitals conducted a study, Meanings of State Hospital Nursing. This article summarizes the study, discusses issues to be resolved when using an insider-outsider research team, and presents the ways in which this approach enhanced the trustworthiness of our findings.     

对软科学研究方法中调查研究程序的探讨

关于软科学研究方法中调查研究的方法，自20世纪80年代以来，逐步被引入到医院管理之中。20世纪90年代以后，则有更多的医院管理者和临床医务工作者频繁运用软科学研究方法中的调查研究的方法开展相关性研究，并由此产出的论文量日渐增加。     

Laissez-faire in research

These were informal remarks in an after-dinner speech about nutritional and pediatric research as it was initiated 50 years ago when the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation was opened. Although from the beginning there were "divisions" in the institute, the success of the organization was due to cooperation rather than division and to the freedom of the investigators to alter their directions according to their change of interests and to changes of needs and opportunities. A plea is made to let capable investigators choose their topics and their methods of research; they are most likely to have success when they are left alone and free of outside pressures.     

Empowering research: statistical power in general practice research

BACKGROUND: Statistical power is a measure of the extent to which a study is capable of discerning differences or associations which exist within the population under investigation, and is of critical importance whenever a hypothesis is tested by statistics. Conventionally, studies should reach a power level of 0.8, such that four times out of five a false null hypothesis will be rejected by a study. Statistical power may most easily be increased by increasing sample size. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the level of statistical power of general practice research. METHODS: A total of 1422 statistical tests in 85 quantitative original papers in the British Journal of General Practice were analysed for statistical power. RESULTS: The median power of tests analysed was 0.71, representing a slightly greater than two-thirds likelihood of rejecting false null hypotheses. Of 85 studies, 37 (44%) attained power of 0.8 or more. Ten studies had power of more than 0.99 suggesting 'over-powering'. Twenty- one of the papers surveyed (25%) had a likelihood of gaining significant results poorer than that obtained by tossing a coin when a null hypothesis is false. CONCLUSION: While achieving higher power than studies in similar surveys of other disciplines, the power of general practice research falls short of the 0.8 convention. Adequate power is essential so that effects which exist are not missed. Recommendations are made concerning power calculations prior to the start of research and reporting of results in journal articles.      

Protecting participants in family medicine research: a consensus statement on improving research integrity and participants' safety in educational research, community-based participatory research, and practice network research

Recent events that include the deaths of research subjects and the falsification of data have drawn greater scrutiny on assuring research data integrity and protecting participants. Several organizations have created guidelines to help guide researchers working in the area of clinical trials and ensure that their research is safe and valid. However, family medicine researchers often engage in research that differs from a typical clinical trial. Investigators working in the areas of educational research, community-based participatory research, and practice-based network research would benefit from similar recommendations to guide their own research. With funding from the US Office of Research Integrity and the Association of American Medical Colleges, we convened a panel to review issues of data integrity and participant protection in educational research, community-based participatory research, and research conducted by practice-based networks. The panel generated 11 recommendations for researchers working in these areas. Three key recommendations include the need for (1) all educational research to undergo review and approval by an institutional review board (IRB), (2) community-based participatory research to be approved not just by an IRB but also by appropriate community representatives, and (3) practice-based researchers to undertake only valid and meaningful studies that can be reviewed by a central IRB, rather than separate IRBs for each participating practice.     

Laissez-faire in research.

These were informal remarks in an after-dinner speech about nutritional and pediatric research as it was initiated 50 years ago when the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation was opened. Although from the beginning there were “divisions” in the institute, the success of the organization was due to cooperation rather than division and to the freedom of the investigators to alter their directions according to their change of interests and to changes of needs and opportunities. A plea is made to let capable investigators choose their topics and their methods of research; they are most likely to have success when they are left alone and free of outside pressures.     

Supererogation in clinical research

'Supererogation' is the notion of going beyond the call of duty. The concept of supererogation has received scrutiny in ethical theory, as well as clinical bioethics. Yet, there has been little attention paid to supererogation in research ethics. Supererogation is examined in this paper from three perspectives: (1) a summary of two analyses of 'supererogation' in moral theory, as well as an examination as to whether acts of supererogation exist; (2) a discussion of supererogation in clinical practice, including arguments that both physicians and patients can practice acts of supererogation; (3) a discussion as to why researchers, qua researchers, are not routinely recognized to perform acts of supererogation, while at the same time the very nature of research subject participation involves supererogation. The article concludes by considering three examples of supererogation on the part of researchers, with a plea that researchers' supererogatory actions be recognized as such.     

A research program for behavioral studies in COPD research]

The demands for medical care of patients with chronic non-specific lung disease (CNSLD) and the prevalence of CNSLD will increase. The need, therefore, for behavioural research on CNSLD will also grow. In order to steer behavioural research in CNSLD, research programming is of great importance. Forty-seven Dutch and 13 foreign expert medical and behavioural scientists were asked via an interview about the most prominent topics and conditions for future research in this field. In addition a literature survey with the same aim was carried out. Important topics for future research include: quality of life of CNSLD patients, patient needs, psychophysiological investigation, social and psychosocial aspects of CNSLD, compliance, problems at work and school, and the education of those involved in patient care.     

Advances in scrapie research

The bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis clearly demonstrated the need to keep animal transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) under control in order to protect animal and human health. Scrapie is the most widespread TSE of livestock in the world. For this reason, health authorities in different countries have elaborated plans that aim towards scrapie eradication. The unusual nature of the scrapie agent and the fragmented status of scientific knowledge about it, along with the limitations of currently available diagnostic tools, make it unlikely that the objective of eradication will be achieved in the near future. Scientific research is focused on acquiring the knowledge that will improve the efficiency of these efforts.     

Ethics in epidemiological research

This text focus, on a series of author's opinions, on the difficulties that the current system of regulation of ethics in research represents for the practice of the epidemiological research, in the Country. It introduces a few understandings concerning the present subject in the international literature, pointing out some of the most relevant themes and problems. It also examines part of the difficulties faced by Brazilian epidemiologists. The main topic developed in the article is the specificity of the science's reasoning that guides acting of the public health and epidemiology with repercussions for the practice of scientific research in this field, plenty different from the science's reasoning that preside medical practice and biomedical research. Hence the inadequacy of the ethical recommendations in force, all of them based on biomedical research, particularly at that with experimental design. It concludes with the indication that procedures adopted by the system of the ethics in research should be reviewed, adapting such procedures to the characteristics of different kinds of research.