Barium enema versus colonoscopy for patients with polyps found during flexible sigmoidoscopy

This prospective study compares the accuracy of barium enema examination performed by experienced radiologists to colonoscopy performed by experienced gastroenterologists blinded to the radiographic findings to detect proximal, synchronous lesions in patients with polyps detected during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. Three thousand six patients were examined, of whom 147 (5%) had polyps larger than 0.5 cm in diameter. Of 114 patients who completed the protocol, 46 patients (40%) had synchronous, proximal colonic lesions. There were no radiographic false positives, but the single-contrast barium enema missed polyps in 13 while detecting polyps in 2 patients (sensitivity = 13%). The double-contrast barium enema missed proximal polyps in 23 patients while detecting them in 8 (sensitivity = 26%). We conclude that patients with neoplastic polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy should have colonoscopy without barium enema. If the entire colon cannot be examined at colonoscopy, we advise double-contrast barium enema.     

Prospective comparison of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy in patients with fecal occult blood: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The utility of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for evaluation of the colon has been debated. Air-contrast barium enema is less expensive and invasive than colonoscopy, but it also is less sensitive and specific. Further, although air-contrast barium enema may be less painful than colonoscopy, it often is poorly tolerated by patients. Thus, this study compared the sensitivity and the specificity of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for detection of colonic lesions in patients with fecal occult blood. METHODS: Over a 30-month period, patients with fecal occult blood were recruited. Patients underwent standard air-contrast barium enema, followed by colonoscopy 7 to 14 days later. Colonoscopists were blinded to the results of air-contrast barium enema until the colonoscopy was completed, after which the results were disclosed. If the findings were discrepant, colonoscopy was repeated. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were evaluated. Nine air-contrast barium enemas were reported to be inadequate, and the cecum was not intubated at colonoscopy in two patients. In the remaining patients, 5 cancers were identified (1 each cecum, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) by both studies. Sixty-six polypoid lesions were identified in 30 patients. Diverticula were identified in 42 patients by air-contrast barium enema and in 18 patients by colonoscopy. Air-contrast barium enema detected 3 of 36 polypoid lesions 5 mm or less in diameter, 5 of 15 adenomas 6 to 9 mm in size, and 4 of 15 adenomas 10 mm or greater in diameter (sensitivity 8%, 33%, and 27%, respectively). After excluding patients with diverticula, air-contrast barium enema detected 3 of 7 adenomas 10 mm or greater in size. Overall, 12 polypoid lesions or filling defects were identified by air-contrast barium enema that could not be verified by colonoscopy. The specificity of air-contrast barium enema for lesions 1.0 cm or greater in size was 100%; for those 6 mm or greater, it was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Air-contrast barium enema accurately detects colon cancer and diverticula. Its sensitivity for detection of polypoid lesions or adenomas is poor and was confounded by the presence of diverticula.     

Factors affecting the technical difficulty of colonoscopy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is a standard diagnostic tool for screening and surveillance of diseases affecting the colon. Colonoscopy may be painful for patients and difficult for the endoscopist. The aim of this study was to identify the factors affecting the technical difficulty of a colonoscopic examination and to predict potential difficult patients who will undergo colonoscopy. METHODOLOGY: A total of 646 outpatients were consecutively included in this study. Patient's age and gender, body mass index (BMI), prior surgical history, and the duration and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were recorded before the procedure. The quality of bowel preparation, the difficulty of examination reported by the colonoscopist, the degree of patient pain, the degree of pain as reported by an observer, cecal intubation time andcolonoscopic findings were assessed after the procedure. RESULTS: We evaluated the difficulty of colonoscopy by cecal intubation time. Advanced age (>50 years), female gender, low BMI (< or = 23 Kg/m2), poor bowel preparation, prior surgical history, patient pain and the presence of IBS were associated with prolonged cecal intubation time. A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that advanced age, female gender, low BMI, poor bowel preparation and patient pain were independent factors related to prolonged cecal intubation time. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced age, female gender and low BMI, information that colonoscopy may be difficult and painful should be provided. If a colonoscopy is not absolutely indicated, barium enema or CT colonography may be performed as alternative diagnostic modalities.     

Quality indicators in pediatric colonoscopy: an Australian tertiary center experience

Objectives: Quality indicators for colonoscopy in adults are largely driven by colorectal cancer screening, and include cecal intubation rates, with rates of >90% recommended. In contrast, colorectal cancer is rare in childhood, with paucity of data on relevant quality indicators for pediatric colonoscopy. It is also unclear whether high rates of cecal intubation are achievable in small children. Our aim was to audit all colonoscopies performed in a tertiary pediatric center to examine clinical indications for procedure, completeness of examination with cecal and ileal intubation, significant findings, and complications.

Methods: Retrospective review of colonoscopies performed between November 2011 and October 2015 was undertaken.

Results: Total colonoscopy was performed in 652 patients, 53% male, with median age 13.0 (range 0.4–18.2) years. The most common indications for colonoscopy were assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) 57.9% (378/652), rectal bleeding 10% (68/652) and abdominal pain 10% (68/652). Trainees performed 69.8% (452/652) of procedures. Quality of bowel preparation was mentioned in 63% (410/652), of which 22% (90/410) were considered inadequate. Cecal intubation rate was 96.3% (628/652) and ileal intubation rate was 92.4% (603/652). Extent of procedure was confirmed in 99.2% of patients with photographs and/or ileal biopsy. Poor quality of bowel preparation (p?=?.001) and age <5years (p?=?.007) were inversely related to successful ileal intubation.

Conclusions: High rates of cecal and ileal intubation are achievable in pediatric colonoscopy. Ileal intubation should be considered a quality indicator since the main indicator for pediatric colonoscopy is to investigate IBD.     

Colonoscopy: Its role in cancer of the colon and rectum

In order to determine the feasibility, yield, and impact of routine total colonoscopy on the management of large-bowel cancer 157 cancer patients underwent 175 colonoscopic procedures; 13.6 per cent of the cancers had been missed on double-contrast barium enema examination. Among 92 patients undergoing perioperative colonoscopy, the lesion was reached in 89 per cent and the cecum in 60 per cent; 7.6 per cent demonstrated synchronous cancers, all curable, and all missed on barium-enema examination. Seventy-eight patients underwent colonoscopy at an average of 3.7 years after treatment of the index cancer; 7.7 per cent demonstrated metachronous cancers, all curable, two-thirds of which were missed on barium-enema examination. Benign polyps were noted in 62 per cent of the patients studied; 77 per cent of those polyps, 1 cm or greater in size, were missed on barium-enema examination. Polyps were found proximal to the cancer in 60 per cent of the patients with polyps. Approximately 85 per cent of those with multiple cancers demonstrated benign polyps. Preoperative total colonoscopy with periodic postoperative colonoscopy at an interval of three to five years are essential in the reliable detection of synchronous cancers and for the detection of metachronous cancers at an earlier, more favorable stage. Read at the Meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Atlanta, Georgia, June 10 to 14, 1979. This article received the Purdue Frederick Award for best paper authored by a resident.     

Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens

OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy is an effective method for discovery of adenomas and for colon cancer screening and prevention. Studies evaluating back-to-back colonoscopies have estimated significant miss rates but are limited by the lack of a definitive gold standard. Our study evaluated the sensitivity of colonoscopy compared with examination of surgically resected colon as a gold standard. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had a portion of colon surgically removed and had lower endoscopy within 5 months. The focus of the review was not for the particular lesion for which the surgery was indicated but, rather, for the synchronous lesions in the portions of bowel that were removed. Sensitivity was determined by counting the number of lesions detected at colonoscopy compared with those found in the surgically resected segment. RESULTS: A total of 73 synchronous lesions were present in the resected segments of 156 patients. Colonoscopy detected 56 of 73 the lesions (sensitivity 76.7%: 95% CI = 67-86). Of the 17 missed lesions, 14 of 17 (82%, 95% CI = 64-100) were < 1-cm polyps. Endoscopy overlooked one 1-cm adenoma in the ascending colon. Two cancers were missed, both in the same patient in whom endoscopy detected a sigmoid cancer but missed synchronous lesions in the cecal and ascending colon. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is an effective method of finding cancers and polyps, but it is associated with significant miss rates for polyps <1 cm. The entire bowel should be carefully evaluated to exclude synchronous tumors in patients with known colorectal cancer. Further improvement of colonoscopic techniques and technologies is warranted.     

Colonoscopy can miss diverticula of the left colon identified by barium enema

AIM: To identify the diagnostic value of colonoscopy for diverticulosis as determined by barium enema. METHODS: A total of 65 patients with hematochezia who underwent colonoscopy and barium enema were analyzed, and the diagnostic value of colonoscopy for diverticula was assessed. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was compared in relation to age (< 70 or ≥ 70 years), sex, and colon location. The number of diverticula was counted, and the detection ratio was calculated. RESULTS: Colonic diverticula were observed in 46 patients with barium enema. Colonoscopy had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 90%. No significant differences were found in the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) for age group or sex. The ROC-AUC of the left colon was significantly lower than that of the right colon (0.81 vs 0.96, P=0.02). Colonoscopy identified 486 colonic diverticula, while barium enema identified 1186. The detection ratio for the entire colon was therefore 0.41 (486/1186). The detection ratio in the left colon (0.32, 189/588) was significantly lower than that of the right colon (0.50, 297/598) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared with barium enema, only half the number of colonic diverticula can be detected by colonoscopy in the entire colon and even less in the left colon.     

Which colorectal cancers are missed by double contrast barium enema?

Abstract Background The relative merits of either barium enema or colonoscopy for investigating lower gastrointestinal tract symptoms is still unclear. We studied the value of double contrast barium enema (DCBE) as the initial evaluation modality. We reviewed our 10-year experience of double contrast enemas as read by consultant radiologists. The study also aimed to identify which lesions are usually missed. Patients and methods We reviewed clinical data for all patients who underwent DCBE within the 6 months prior to surgical resection of colorectal cancer between April 1989 and April 1999. Patient demographics and tumour characteristics were analysed for their effects on the likelihood of the lesions being missed at DCBE. Results There were 706 patients included in the study, 54.2% were male and the mean age was 63.7 years (SEM=0.5 years). The site along the colon and rectum of tumours missed by DCBE corresponded with the frequency of tumour occurrence at each site. The overall rate of missed lesions was 4.1% (29 of 706 patients); these patients were found on subsequent endoscopy to harbour cancer. Tumours less than 3 cm in length and with lesser extent of circumferential involvement were more likely missed at DCBE (p=0.05 and p=0.01, respectively). Age, sex, and tumour grade and stage were not significant predictors of the likelihood of missed lesions. Of the 29 patients with missed lesions, 77.2% had a serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) above the normal range (3.5 µg/l). The mean follow-up was 65.3 months (SEM=1.8 months). The overall survival for this series was 60.1%. The inaccuracy of the initial DCBE was not found to cause statistically significant differences in the stage of the tumour at diagnosis nor the overall survival of the patients in our series. Conclusions Smaller cancers without circumferential involvement may be missed when DCBE is performed to evaluate lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Further evaluation by colonoscopy must be recommended when symptoms persist, especially in the context of a raised CEA level.     

Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Certain factors in a patient's history, such as prior abdominal surgery or complicated diverticular disease, have been reported to hinder cecal intubation during colonoscopy. Over a 16-month period, 1,047 consecutive colonoscopies were prospectively evaluated to determine whether these factors were indeed clinically relevant. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients (9 percent) who had incomplete intubation of the colon, there were significantly more women (66 percent) than men (34 percent) (P <0.001). Women with a history of abdominal hysterectomy had a significantly lower cecal intubation rate (P < 0.01). A history of diverticulitis did not alter the cecal intubation rate. In patients with incomplete colonic intubation, the most proximal extent of intubation was the sigmoid colon in women (31 percent) and the right colon in men (68 percent). Sixty-seven percent of patients with incomplete intubation of the colon had a prior colonoscopy completed to the cecum (67 percent women, 67 percent men), whereas 50 percent had a follow-up colonoscopy completed to the cecum (56 percent women, 40 percent men). CONCLUSIONS: Women, especially those with a history of abdominal hysterectomy, had a significantly lower cecal intubation rate usually because of an impassable sigmoid colon. Prior inability to complete colonoscopy to the cecum does not necessarily forecast future failure.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 7 to 12, 1995.     

A new water instillation method for colonoscopy without sedation as performed by endoscopists-in-training

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy may be associated with discomfort when performed without sedation. A study was conducted to determine whether instillation of water into the colon at the beginning of the procedure reduces intubation time as well as patient discomfort and pain. METHODS: Colonoscopy was performed in 259 patients by 3 endoscopists-in-training with limited experience. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. In one, a technique was used in which 500 to 1000 mL of water is instilled into the colon by enema at the beginning of the procedure (instillation group, n = 130). In the other, patients underwent a conventional colonoscopy (control group, n = 129). Intubation time was measured and compared between the groups, and subjective discomfort experienced by the patients was measured upon completion of the examination. RESULTS: Success rates for insertion to the cecum were similar, (95.4%, instillation group; 96.1%, control group). Detection rates for any colorectal diseases were not different between the groups (30.0% vs. 32.6%). Mean time to cecal intubation was 10.5 minutes in the instillation group and 16.2 minutes in the control group (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients who complained of abdominal pain during the procedure was 17.1% in the instillation group and 33.3% in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When used by endoscopists-in-training, the water-instillation colonoscopy technique was associated with less discomfort and faster cecal intubation with no decrease in the rate of detection of colorectal diseases.     

The use of water-soluble contrast enema without pretreatment for the diagnosis of colon disease.

Conventional colonoscopy and barium enema are the main examinations for colonic lesions, but each of them has different limitations according to the condition of the patient. It has been reported that preparations for these examinations also caused complications, such as colonic perforation leading to fatality. To avoid these complications, colonic enema with water-soluble contrast medium (Gatrografin) has been performed as a screening method for those suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases, or those in whom it was difficult to be form colonoscopy and barium enema because of their poor condition. There are few reports about water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE). We retrospectively examined 121 cases of WSCE performed from January 2004 to December 2005 and assessed the acceptability of examination and its ability to detect colonic lesions. We divided our patients into five groups according to the reason for performing WSCE. In all cases, we were able to perform WSCE without complications and assess colonic lesions. In 58 cases, we compared the results of WSCE with those of barium enema or colonoscopy, or both In 8 cases we missed small colonic polyps and erosions, but we missed only one large polyp 3 cm in diameter, which we detected retrospectively. In conclusion, WSCE is safe and useful for the diagnosis of colonic disease, and may be one of the choices of colonic examination especially for those who are suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases or hemorrhagic lesions as well as for those in whom it is difficult to perform barium enema or colonoscopy.     

Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema

The radiographs and clinical records of 26 patients with colorectal cancer missed on barium enema, and subsequently detected at colonoscopy, were reviewed to determine the cause of radiological error. Twenty (77%) of the patients were female. In 24 of 26 patients, anemia and/or rectal bleeding was a presenting feature. Fourteen of the 26 (54%) missed cancers were in the sigmoid colon, 10 (38%) in the ascending colon or hepatic flexure, and two (8%) in the rectum. Tumor size ranged from 20-100 mm. Fifteen were polyps, and 11 annular cancers. Fourteen (54%) were Dukes C or D tumors. Twenty-eight barium enemas in 23 patients were available for review: 86% were double-contrast studies. In 18 (76%), the cancer could be seen in retrospect and, in over half, the tumor was obvious. The dominant perceptive error was due to missing the lesion in the barium pool. Other major errors were missing the lesion en face or in overlapping loops. As most cancers were missed because of observer perceptive error, by both experienced and inexperienced radiologists, the authors recommend double reporting of all barium enemas.     

Benefits and Limitations of Cap-Fitted Colonoscopy in Screening Colonoscopy

Background

Colonoscopy is widely used to detect colorectal cancer and to remove precancerous lesions to reduce the risk of colonic cancer.

Aims

To examine the benefits and limitations of cap-fitted colonoscopy compared to conventional colonoscopy in terms of technical performance and colorectal adenoma detection rate.

Methods

Screening colonoscopies performed from 2009 to 2010 with or without a transparent cap were retrospectively examined to compare the rate of successful intubation, cecal intubation time, and number, size, shape, and location of adenomas detected. An inclusion criterion was visualization of >95 % of the right colon.

Results

Data from 2,301 colonoscopies (1,165 with cap-fitted colonoscopy, 1,136 without the transparent cap) were retrospectively analyzed. Procedures were performed by four experienced endoscopists. The subjects’ demographic characteristics and technical performances were similar between the two methods. The only significant difference in the technical performance between the two techniques was a shorter cecal intubation time with cap-fitted colonoscopy (5.3 vs. 6.6 min; p = 0.045) by one endoscopist. The total number of adenomas detected was significantly higher with cap-fitted colonoscopy than without the cap (586 vs. 484, respectively; p < 0.0001). Adenoma detection with cap-fitted endoscopy was significantly higher in the right colon than in the left colon (19 vs. 12 %, respectively; p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Cap-fitted colonoscopy did not improve the technical aspects of colonoscopy but significantly increased adenoma detection, especially in the right colon. It did not increase the detection rate of flat or depressed adenomas.     

Benign colorectal neoplasms undetected by colonoscopy.

This retrospective investigation assessed the sensitivity of colonoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps seen previously at barium enema examination. Included in the study were 77 patients with 106 polypoid lesions. Films showing lesions not subsequently seen at colonoscopy were reviewed and only those lesions with a visible point of attachment, exhibiting no movement in response to filling or change in position of the patient, and confidently diagnosed as a polyp by both reviewing radiologists were included among the 106 lesions. Sixteen lesions (15%) seen radiologically were not located colonoscopically, indicating an endoscopic sensitivity of 85%. Contrary to previous reports, most of the lesions missed endoscopically were in the left colon in regions thought to have been traversed by the instrument. The 15% false-negative rate found for colonoscopy is consistent with existing reports on colonoscopic errors and is approximately the same as the false-negative error rate for radiologic detection of colonic polyps.     

The role of colonoscopy in screening persons with family history of colorectal cancer

Abstract First-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients are at increased risk for developing colorectal neoplasms. In order to assess the potentiality of colonoscopy screening in this high-risk population, 213 asymptomatic family members (age range 30-69 years, mean 42.8 years) of those patients with colorectal cancer received colonoscopic examination at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital from April 1992 to May 1994. Twenty-eight persons with 42 lesions (polyps or cancer) were identified, including 28 adenomas, nine hyperplastic polyps and five adenocarcinomas. The positive detection rate was 9.9% for adenoma and 2.3% for cancer. Colorectal neoplasms afflicted males more frequently than females (16.7 vs 5.7%, P < 0.05) and occurred less frequently in those < 40 years of age (5.5 vs 17.2%, P < 0.05). Forty-two per cent of the detected neoplastic lesions were beyond the reach of 60 cm flexible sigmoidoscopy and 36% of adenomas were < 0.5 cm in size and would be missed if patients were screened by air contrast barium enema. Cost analysis revealed that the charges of both screening colonoscopy and screening flexible sigmoidoscopy/air contrast barium enema were approximate. Colonoscopy also has a high acceptability and safety. It appears appropriate to use colonoscopy, rather than flexible sigmoidoscopy or air contrast barium enema, as an initial screening procedure for persons with a family history of colorectal cancer, especially those > 40 years of age.     

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Patients with resected colorectal cancer are at risk for recurrent cancer and metachronous neoplasms in the colon. This joint update of guidelines by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer addresses only the use of endoscopy in the surveillance of these patients. Patients with endoscopically resected Stage I colorectal cancer, surgically resected Stages II and III cancers, and Stage IV cancer resected for cure (isolated hepatic or pulmonary metastasis) are candidates for endoscopic surveillance. The colorectum should be carefully cleared of synchronous neoplasia in the perioperative period. In nonobstructed colons, colonoscopy should be performed preoperatively. In obstructed colons, double-contrast barium enema or computed tomography colonography should be performed preoperatively, and colonoscopy should be performed 3 to 6 months after surgery. These steps complete the process of clearing synchronous disease. After clearing for synchronous disease, another colonoscopy should be performed in 1 year to look for metachronous lesions. This recommendation is based on reports of a high incidence of apparently metachronous second cancers in the first 2 years after resection. If the examination at 1 year is normal, then the interval before the next subsequent examination should be 3 years. If that examination is normal, then the interval before the next subsequent examination should be 5 years. Shorter intervals may be indicated by associated adenoma findings (see "Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society"). Shorter intervals also are indicated if the patient's age, family history, or tumor testing indicate definite or probable hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Patients undergoing low anterior resection of rectal cancer generally have higher rates of local cancer recurrence compared with those with colon cancer. Although effectiveness is not proven, performance of endoscopic ultrasound or flexible sigmoidoscopy at 3- to 6-month intervals for the first 2 years after resection can be considered for the purpose of detecting a surgically curable recurrence of the original rectal cancer.     

Prospective evaluation of hospitalized patients with nonactive lower intestinal bleeding--timing and role of barium enema and colonoscopy

A prospective evaluation of 176 hospitalized patients with nonactive lower intestinal bleeding demonstrated that a barium enema is not a necessary prerequisite for a sensitive and safe total colonoscopic examination. Colonoscopy was better in detecting colonic polyps and colon cancers than barium enema. It was concluded that colonoscopy without prior barium enema provides a sensitive diagnostic approach to hospitalized patients with nonactive lower intestinal bleeding. This approach does not interfere with the early use of angiography and may shorten hospitalization.     

Synchronous and “early” metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative diagnostic examinations and determined whether patients with synchronous colorectal cancers differ from patients with a single colorectal malignancy in clinicopathologic factors, the possibility of early metachronous colorectal cancer, and postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 1,780 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from 1987 to 1993 was performed. We divided patients into three groups: Group 1, single colorectal adenocarcinoma; Group 2, synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma; and Group 3, early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: There were 52 cases (3 percent) in Group 2 and 13 cases (1 percent) in Group 3 (<3 years from the index colorectal cancer operation). Differences in age, gender, and cancer-free rate among the three groups did not reached statistical significance. Compared with cancers in Group 1, significantly more proximal tumor locations and early cancer stage were noted for the second and third cancers in Group 2. In Group 3 a significantly more proximal tumor site was noted for the index colorectal cancer but cancer stage showed no significant difference from cancers in Group 1. Better histologic type was also noted in the index and second cancers in Group 2 than in cancers in Group 1. There was a higher incidence of associated benign adenoma in Group 2 (35 vs. 15 percent in Group 1). The positivity rate of Group 2 was significantly higher by preoperative colonoscopy (71 percent) and incidental findings at surgery (58 percent) than barium enema examination (30 percent). CONCLUSION: Preoperative barium enema examination was an unsatisfactory tool for detecting synchronous tumors. Preoperative colonoscopy demonstrated a higher positivity rate, but it still failed to detect nearly 30 percent of cases with synchronous tumors. Intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum could detect nearly 60 percent of unexpected synchronous tumors. We believe both colonoscopy and intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum are crucial to the early detection of synchronous colorectal cancer.     

Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests

Purpose

Patient experience varies with the currently available colon imaging tests, including air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy. We examined differences in patient experience with colon imaging tests and whether they varied with gender, age, and race.

Subjects and methods

Patients with fecal occult blood, hematochezia, iron-deficiency anemia, or a family history of colon cancer underwent air contrast barium enema followed 7 to 14 days later by computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy. Validated patient experience questionnaires that measured the experience for each test and a separate questionnaire that obtained an overall summary measure were administered after testing. Eleven patient experiences including pain, embarrassment, difficulty with bowel preparation, and satisfaction with tests were examined.

Results

A total of 614 subjects completed all 3 imaging tests. The test most patients were willing to repeat was colonoscopy; it also was reported to be the least painful procedure. Patients were least satisfied with air contrast barium enema, and fewer would undergo air contrast barium enema compared with computed tomographic colonography or colonoscopy. There were limited racial and gender differences in perceptions of the tests. Younger adults perceived air contrast barium enema to be more painful than older adults.

Conclusion

Taking into account a wide variety of patient experience measures, patients preferred colonoscopy to air contrast barium enema and computed tomographic colonography. This finding has important implications for physicians considering different colon imaging tests.     

Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope

Abstract

Objective. Few data are available on the influence of a colonoscope length for trainees, which could affect both the duration of training and colonoscopy quality. We conducted this study to validate which scope needs more duration for training to reach technical competence and to shows better quality indicators during diagnostic colonoscopy. Materials and methods. We conducted a prospective randomly assigned study from April 2010 to February 2011 at Asan Medical Center. Among the 1329 patients enrolled, 1200 colonoscopies were analyzed. We compared cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation time (<20 min), and withdrawal time between the trainees using the intermediate-length colonoscope and those using long-length colonoscope. Results. Trainees who used the long-length colonoscope showed a higher overall cecal intubation rate (88.2% vs. 81.0%, p = 0.001) and adenoma detection rate (49.7% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) than those using the intermediate-length colonoscope. The successful cecal intubation rate improved significantly and reached the requisite standard of competence (>90%) after 90 procedures in the long-length colonoscope group. However, the trainees using the intermediate-length colonoscope reached the requisite standard of competence after 150 procedures. Logistic regression analysis revealed that prolonged cecal intubation was associated with the use of the intermediate-length colonoscope, poor colon preparation, a small number of esophagastroduodenoscopy or sigmoidoscopy procedures conducted, and pain during procedures. Conclusions. During the same training period, use of the long-length colonoscope in trainee was better in terms of reaching competency and quality indicators, and was less painful for the patients during colonoscopic procedures.