Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in patients with endometrial cancer using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and an intraoperative gamma probe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and January 2003, 28 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who were scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total pelvic lymphadenectomy, and paraaortic lymphadenectomy at Tohoku University School of Medicine underwent sentinel lymph node detection. On the day before surgery, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed by injection of 99m-Technetium ((99m)Tc)-labeled phytate into the endometrium during hysteroscopy. At the time of surgery, a gamma-detecting probe was used to locate radioactive lymph nodes. RESULTS: At least one sentinel node was detected in each of 23 of the 28 patients (82%). The mean number of sentinel nodes detected was 3.1 (range, 1-9). Sentinel nodes could be identified in 21 of 22 patients (95%) whose tumor did not invade more than halfway into the myometrium. Eighteen patients had radioactive nodes in the paraaortic area. Most patients had a sentinel node in one of the following three sites: paraaortic, external iliac, and obturator. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph node metastases were both 100%. CONCLUSION: The combination of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with intraoperative gamma probe detection may be useful in identifying sentinel nodes in early-stage endometrial cancer.     

Intraoperative sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer using a combination of radiolabeled albumin injection and isosulfan blue dye injection

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the feasibility of sentinel lymph node identification using radioisotopic lymphatic mapping with technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin and isosulfan blue dye injection in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. METHODS: Between September 2000 and October 2002, 25 patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage I (n=24) or stage II (n=1) underwent sentinel lymph node detection with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (technetium-99m colloid albumin injection around the tumor) and intraoperative lymphatic mapping with blue dye and a handheld or laparoscopic gamma probe. Complete pelvic or paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed in all cases by open surgery or laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: In 23 evaluable patients, a total of 51 sentinel lymph nodes were detected by lymphoscintigraphy (mean 2.21 nodes per patient). Intraoperatively, 61 sentinel lymph nodes were identified, with a mean of 2.52 nodes per patient by gamma probe and a mean of 1.94 nodes per patient after isosulfan blue injection. Forty percent of sentinel nodes were found in the interiliac region and 25% in the external iliac area. Microscopic nodal metastases (four nodes) were confirmed in 12% of cases. All these lymph nodes were previously detected as sentinel lymph nodes. The remaining 419 nodes after pelvic lymphadenectomy were histologically negative. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node identification with technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid combined with blue dye injection is feasible and showed a 100% negative predictive value, and potentially identified women in whom lymph node dissection can be avoided.     

Comparison of recurrence after vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy with and without sentinel node biopsy in early stage vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine the usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage vulvar cancer and to assess recurrences after surgical treatment with sentinel node identification or surgical treatment without sentinel node identification. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 55 patients with early stage vulvar cancer operated on between 1995 and 2005. A prospective series of 28 patients who underwent vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy with intraoperative sentinel lymph node identification between 2000 and 2005 (SLN group) was compared with a retrospective series of 27 patients who underwent vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy without sentinel node procedure between 1995 and 2000 (non-SLN group). Patients in the sentinel node identification group underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (technetium-99 colloid albumin injection around the tumor) and intraoperative mapping with isosulfan blue dye. RESULTS: In the SLN group, 9 tumors were T1 and 19 were T2, with a total of 40 groins dissected and 9 positive nodes in 7 patients. Sixty-two sentinel lymph nodes were detected with a mean of 2.2 sentinel nodes per patient (range 0-4). A false negative case was found. In the non-SLN group, 7 tumors were T1 and 20 were T2, with a total of 49 groins dissected and 9 positive nodes in 6 patients. Recurrence occurred in 8 patients (28.6%) in the SLN group and in 6 (26.9%) in the non-SLN group (P=0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node identification in early stage vulvar cancer is a feasible. Analysis of recurrence may allow considering this procedure as a possible alternative to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy.     

Preoperative pelvic lymphoscintigraphy is of limited usefulness for sentinel lymph node detection in cervical cancer

Objectives

To analyze concordance between preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping (ILM) for sentinel lymph node identification using technetium 99m-labeled-dextran 500 (99m-Tc) and patent blue dye in patients with early cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, as well as to evaluate sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection.

Study design

Forty-seven patients underwent surgical treatment for cervical cancer. For SLN identification, 99m-Tc and blue patent were injected into the cervix on the eve and day of surgery, respectively. Preoperative pelvic lymphoscintigraphy was performed in all patients after 99m-Tc injection. Concordance between preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and ILM was evaluated.

Results

Of the 56 patients who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, 43 (81.13%) had at least one lymph node identified. Bilateral lymph nodes were identified in 21 (37.5%) patients. Sentinel lymph nodes detected on ILM had been previously found on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 66.7%, 67.2% and 0% in the right, left and central locations, respectively. In 14 patients (25%), only one lymph node was identified on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, but more than one sentinel lymph node was detected on intraoperative mapping. In nine (16.1%) patients, lymphoscintigraphy showed only unilateral lymph nodes, but ILM identified bilateral sentinel lymph nodes.

Conclusion

The combination of patent blue and radionuclide techniques produced excellent results for SLN detection in cervical cancer. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy does not offer any advantage over ILM for SLN identification.     

Sentinel node detection in cervical cancer with (99m)Tc-phytate

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification using radioisotopic lymphatic mapping with technetium-99 m-labeled phytate in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. METHODS: Between July 2001 and February 2003, 56 patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage I (n = 53) or stage II (n = 3) underwent sentinel lymph node detection with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy ((99m)Tc-labeled phytate injected into the uterine cervix, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock, at a dose of 55-74 MBq in a volume of 0.8 ml) and intraoperative lymphatic mapping with a handheld gamma probe. Radical hysterectomy was aborted in three cases because parametrial invasion was found intraoperatively and we performed only sentinel node resection. The remaining 53 patients underwent radical hysterectomy with complete pelvic lymphadenectomy. Sentinel nodes were detected using a handheld gamma-probe and removed for pathological assessment during the abdominal radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: One or more sentinel nodes were detected in 52 out of 56 eligible patients (92.8%). A total of 120 SLNs were detected by lymphoscintigraphy (mean 2.27 nodes per patient) and intraoperatively by gamma probe. Forty-four percent of SLNs were found in the external iliac area, 39% in the obturator region, 8.3% in interiliac region, and 6.7% in the common iliac area. Unilateral sentinel nodes were found in thirty-one patients (59%). The remaining 21 patients (41%) had bilateral sentinel nodes. Microscopic nodal metastases were confirmed in 17 (32%) cases. In 10 of these patients, only SLNs had metastases. The 98 sentinel nodes that were negative on hematoxylin and eosin were submitted to cytokeratin immunohistochemical analysis. Five (5.1%) micrometastases were identified with this technique. The sensitivity of the sentinel node was 82.3% (CI 95% = 56.6-96.2) and the negative predictive value was 92.1% (CI 95% = 78.6-98.3). The accuracy of sentinel node in predicting the lymph node status was 94.2%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping with (99m)Tc-labeled phytate are effective in identifying sentinel nodes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and to select women in whom lymph node dissection can be avoided.     

Groin recurrence after micrometastasis in a sentinel lymph node in a patient with vulvar cancer

BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node concept is attractive in vulvar cancer because of the potential to avoid the morbidity associated with formal groin dissection. CASE: An 84-year-old patient with a T2 carcinoma of the anterior vulva underwent surgery including bilateral sentinel node excision after identification with technetium-labeled nanocolloid. Frozen section histology showed a tumor deposit <1 mm in diameter in a left groin node whereas four nodes in the right groin were apparently negative. Completion lymphadenectomy was performed only for the left groin. Final histology including serial sectioning showed a micrometastasis in one of seven nodes from the right groin; no further treatment was given. Sixteen months postoperatively the patient developed a recurrence in the right groin; the left groin was free of tumor. CONCLUSION: This case indicates that groins with a micrometastasis detected by sentinel lymph node excision require further treatment.     

Sentinel node identification and the ability to detect metastatic tumor to inguinal lymph nodes in squamous cell cancer of the vulva

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify one or more inguinal sentinel nodes in patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and to determine the ability of the sentinel node to predict metastasis to the inguinal lymphatic basin. METHODS: Techniques employing technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sulfur colloid and isosulfan blue dye were utilized to identify sentinel nodes in the inguinal lymphatic beds. Technetium-99m sulfur colloid was injected intradermally at the tumor margins 90-180 min preoperatively followed by a similar injection of isosulfan blue dye 5-10 min before the groin dissection. A handheld collimated gamma counter was employed to identify Tc-99m-labeled sentinel nodes. Lymphatic tracts that had taken up blue dye and their corresponding sentinel node were also identified and retrieved. A completion inguinal dissection was then performed. Each sentinel node was labeled as hot and blue, hot and nonblue, or cold and blue. The sentinel nodes were subjected to pathologic examination with step sections and nonsentinel nodes were evaluated in the standard fashion. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a median age of 79 were entered onto protocol and a total of 31 inguinal node dissections were performed. A sentinel node was identified in 31/31 (100%) groin dissections with the use of Tc-99m. Isosulfan blue dye identified a sentinel node in 19/31 (61%) groin dissections. Surgical staging revealed 7 patients with stage I disease, 5 with stage II disease, 5 with stage III disease, and 4 with stage IV disease. Lymph nodes in 9 groin dissections were found to have metastatic disease, and in 4 of these dissections, the sentinel node was the only positive node. Lymph nodes in 22 groin dissections had no evidence of metastasis. No false-negative sentinel lymph nodes were obtained (sentinel node negative and a nonsentinel node positive). CONCLUSION: Tc-99m sulfur colloid is superior to isosulfan blue dye in the detection of sentinel nodes in inguinal dissections of patients with vulvar cancer. A sentinel node dissection utilizing Tc-99m alone can identify a sentinel node in all inguinal dissections. Pathologic examination with step sections has shown the sentinel node to be an accurate predictor of metastatic disease to the inguinal nodal chain.     

Sentinel node localization should be interpreted with caution in midline vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE: Carcinomas of the vulva situated on the midline or close to it, are supposed to have a bilateral lymphatic drainage. The aim of this study was to evaluate sentinel node identification in these tumors. METHODS: Between April 2002 and February 2004, 17 patients with operable vulvar cancer situated on, or close to the midline were entered in a prospective study. All patients underwent sentinel node identification with (99m)Tc-labelled nanocolloid (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative use of a handheld probe). Depending on the surgeon, intraoperative blue dye was associated. Radical excision of the tumor and routine bilateral lymphadenectomy were then performed. Sentinel nodes were sent separately for histologic examination. Negative sentinel nodes on hematoxylin/eosine were further examined with immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: One or more sentinel nodes were identified in the 17 patients and in 21 of the 34 groins. In 5 patients, the sentinel nodes were metastatic. There was no false negative (negative sentinel node and metastatic non-sentinel node). In 13 patients, lymphoscintigraphy and then intraoperative identification suggested a unilateral drainage of the tumor with sentinel nodes localized in only one groin. Among these 13 patients, 3 groins with no sentinel node identified contained in fact massively metastatic nodes. CONCLUSION: Unilateral finding of a sentinel node in tumors of the midline does not preclude a metastatic node in the other groin. Lymph node assessment should remain bilateral in these lesions.     

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fundal injection of blue dye and radiocolloid for lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in women with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: At laparotomy, 18 women with high-risk endometrial cancer had isosulfan blue and technitium-99 radiocolloid injected into the uterine fundus subserosally. Sentinel nodes were then identified either by direct observation of blue dye, by radioactive counts using a handheld gamma counter, or by a combination of both methods. The number and location of sentinel node(s) were recorded and compared with the final lymph node specimens after hysterectomy and selective lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: A sentinel node was identified in only 8 (45%) of the cases. Four patients had sentinel nodes only in the pelvis, 2 had sentinel nodes in the pelvis and above the bifurcation of the aorta, and 2 patients had sentinel nodes above the bifurcation of the aorta only. Seven (88%) patients had unilateral drainage of dye and the radiocolloid; the other patient had bilateral drainage. No patients had metastatic disease to sentinel or nonsentinel lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Subserosal fundal injection of blue dye and the radiocolloid is a poor technique for identifying sentinel lymph nodes in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.     

Validation of the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with vulvar cancer: results of a multicenter study in Germany

ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the sentinel node procedure in patients with vulvar cancer, a multicenter study was launched in Germany in 2003 involving 7 oncology centers.Patients and methodsBetween 2003 and 2006, 127 women with primary T1–T3 vulvar cancer were entered in the study and treated with sentinel node removal after application of ^99mTechnetium labeled nanocolloid and/or blue dye. Subsequently, in all women a complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy and the adequate vulvar operation were performed. Sentinel lymph nodes were examined by routine pathologic examination (H&;E), followed by step-sectioning and immunhistochemistry if negative.ResultsThe sentinel node procedure was successful in 125 out of 127 cases, in 2 cases no sentinel nodes were detected. 21 patients received unilateral lymphadenectomy, 103 women were operated on both groins. In 39 women out of 127, positive lymph nodes in one or both groins were identified (30.7%). In 36 women, the sentinel nodes were also positive (sensitivity 92.3%). We had three cases with a false negative sentinel node (false negative rate: 7.7%), all of these women presenting with tumors in midline position. One tumor was a T1 tumor (10 mm), 2 tumors being classified as T2 (40 and 56 mm, respectively). In one additional case (18 mm T1 tumor, midline position), the sentinel was positive in the right groin, but false negative on the left side.ConclusionsThis study shows that identification of SLN in squamous cell cancer of the vulva is feasible, however not highly accurate depending on tumor localization and size. The false negative rate seems to be acceptable if the procedure is restricted to stage 1 tumors with clinically negative lymph node status. Tumors situated in or close to the midline seem to be less suitable for this procedure. Implementation of SLNB into clinical practice should be performed with care and only by experienced teams as to avoid preventable groin relapses.     

Impact sur la survie de la procédure du ganglion sentinelle dans le cancer de la vulve : analyse de la SEER database

ObjectivesVulvar cancer is usually treated with vulvectomy and bilateral groin lymphadenectomy, which result in serious morbidities while only 30% of patients have positive nodes. The sentinel node technique has good sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph node involvement while minimizing postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the specific and overall survival impact of sentinel lymph node procedure versus inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer.Patients and methodsThis is a retrospective study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database on patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, T1 or T2 stage, metastatis-free, followed between 2004 and 2008.ResultsOne thousand and thirty eight patients had a systematic groin lymphadenectomy and 56 a sentinel node technique (including 22 with an associated lymphadenectomy because of a positive sentinel node). There is no significant difference in overall or specific survival between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, age, T stage and nodal status are prognostic factors for overall and specific mortality (P < 0.05).Discussion and conclusionSentinel node technique is not associated with an excess risk of mortality or recurrence.     

Sentinel node detection with radiocolloid lymphatic mapping in early invasive cervical cancer

We assessed the feasibility of sentinel lymph node detection using technicium-99 radiocolloid lymphatic mapping for predicting lymph node metastases in early invasive cervical cancer. Thirty patients with cervical cancer (stages IA2-IIA) underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy using technicium-99 intracervical injection and intraoperative lymphatic mapping with a handheld gamma probe. After dissection of the sentinel nodes, the standard procedure of pelvic lymph node dissection and radical hysterectomy was performed as usual. The sentinel node detection rate was 100% (30/30). There were seven (23.3%) cases of microscopic lymph node metastases on pathologic analysis. All of them had sentinel node involvement. Therefore, the sensitivity of sentinel node identification for prediction of lymph node metastases was 100%, and no false negative was found. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, coupled with intraoperative lymphatic mapping, located the sentinel nodes accurately in our study patients. This sentinel node detection method appears to be feasible for predicting lymph node metastases.     

Interest of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on sentinel lymph node identification in patients with breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is nowadays an accepted method of staging breast cancer patients. In case of an injection of radioactive colloid, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is recommended to establish a lymphatic mapping and to predict the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified during surgery. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy does not decrease the false-negative rate. However, positive preoperative lymphoscintigraphy significantly improves the identification rate of intraoperative sentinel nodes comparing with negative preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Detecting extra-axillary sentinel lymph nodes, because of its minimal therapeutic consequences, does not appear to be an indication for preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Given logistics and cost required, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy should be only performed for patients with a high risk of intraoperative failed localization. In case of negative preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, sentinel lymph node biopsy must be tried because sentinel nodes are still identified in the majority of these patients. Another possibility, with important cost and logistic, should consist in performing a later lymphoscintigraphy on the day after radioactive injection to ameliorate sentinel lymph nodes identification.     

Sentinel node dissection and ultrastaging in squamous cell cancer of the vulva

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the findings when pathologic ultrastaging techniques are applied in conjunction with sentinel node dissection in patients with vulvar cancer. METHODS: Patients with squamous cell cancer of the vulva underwent intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy following intradermal injection of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid at the site of the primary tumor. Isosulfan blue dye was also injected at the tumor site to facilitate identification of the sentinel node in the groin. Following removal, the sentinel node was then bisected and examined in the standard manner using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Negative nodes were subjected to additional ultrastaging evaluation with serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: Nine patients with 10 primary tumors underwent radical local excision of the primary tumor and sentinel node dissection of the groin. Sentinel nodes were identified and removed in all patients. One node was positive by conventional staining; the remainder were all negative. Of these negative nodes, 2 were found to be positive for micrometastases on serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining. Therefore 2 of 3 positive nodes were not detected using conventional histologic techniques. CONCLUSION: Sentinel node dissection appears to be technically feasible in patients with vulvar cancer. Pathologic ultrastaging combined with sentinel node dissection appears to be highly sensitive for detecting subclinical micrometastases in the regional lymphatics. This technique potentially provides a more accurate assessment with less surgical morbidity than conventional inguinalfemoral lymphadenectomy.     

Sentinel node identification and intraoperative lymphatic mapping. First results of a pilot study in patients with endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION: To minimize the surgical morbidity after lymphadenectomy, sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) has become fundamental in the management of different malignancies. We decided to evaluate sentinel lymph node (SNL) biopsies also in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy. METHODS: In the setting of a prospective study we developed a technique for sentinel node biopsy of ten patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer. Prior to surgery 99m Tc Nanocol was injected in the peritumoral region by hysteroscopy. Six hours later lymphoscintigraphy was performed to identify the draining lymph nodes. During surgery we first detected the sentinel lymph node by a hand-held gamma tracer and then removed it. Surgery was completed by the standard therapy of total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Scintigraphic identification was possible in eight out of ten patients. Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes was possible in seven out of eight patients. In five patients we found the sentinel lymph nodes in the pelvic region while the other two patients had bilateral sentinel nodes in the pelvic and para-aortic region. Histologically confirmed microscopic tumor metastases of the SLNs and para-aortic lymph nodes were only found in one case. The sentinel lymph nodes from the other six patients were free of tumor and accurately reflected the pathological status. CONCLUSION: The identification of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer is a practical and safe method. In order to improve this technique as a standard procedure for staging of endometrial cancer further studies with a larger number of patients have to be done.     

Sentinel lymph node detection and microstaging in vulvar carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of using complementary techniques for detecting sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in vulvar carcinoma and to evaluate the utility of microstaging techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with invasive vulvar carcinoma underwent sentinel lymph node detection (SLND) using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative isosulfan blue dye injection and an intraoperative hand-held gamma-detecting probe. Eleven patients were included and a total of 16 groins evaluated. Sentinel nodes identified were excised, bisected and examined in surgical pathology using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Pathologically negative SLNs were subjected to additional microstaging via serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin. Surgical management of the vulvar cancer and extent of inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy were individualized based on clinicopathologic parameters, including depth of invasion, location of the tumor and patient performance status. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy, dye and gamma-detector methods led to the total detection of 16, 19 and 17 SLNs, respectively. In two cases the isosulfan blue dye assisted in the isolation of an additional sentinel node over that of the gamma probe. Each method individually identified SLNs in 10/11 patients (91%). A total of 19 sentinel nodes were isolated. One SLN (5%) was positive for metastatic disease using H&E staining. Of the 18 negative SLNs, 2 (11%) had micrometastases (< 0.2 mm) upon serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining. CONCLUSION: Combined-modality mapping enhances detection of SLNs in vulvar carcinoma. Histologic microstaging improves the detection of micrometastases within SLNs.     

Change in clinical management of sentinel lymph node location in early stage cervical cancer: the role of SPECT/CT

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification with SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy imaging in the early stage invasive cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Methods

Between March 2007 and June 2009, a prospective consecutive study was designed for SLN mapping. Twenty-two patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage IB1 (n = 20) or stage IIA1 (n = 2) underwent SLN identification with preoperative SPECT/CT and planar images (technetium-99 m colloid albumin injection around the tumor) and posterior intraoperative detection with both blue dye and a handheld or laparoscopic gamma probe. Complete pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in all cases by open (n = 2) or laparoscopic (n = 20) surgery.

Results

In the present series, a total of 35 SLN were detected with planar images and 40 SLN were identified and well located by SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy (median 2.0 nodes per patient). In 5/22 patients (22.7%) SPECT/CT procedure improves the number of localized SLN. Intraoperatively, 57 SLNs were identified, with a median of 3 SLNs per patient by gamma probe (a total of 53 hot nodes) and a median of 2 nodes per patient after blue dye injection (a total of 42 blue nodes). Microscopic nodal metastases (eight nodes, corresponding to four patients) were confirmed in 18.18% of cases; all these lymph nodes were previously detected as SLN. The remaining 450 nodes, including SLNs, following complete pelvic lymphadenectomy, were histologically negative.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node detection is improved by SPECT/CT imaging because of the increased number of SLN detected and the better tridimensional anatomic location, allowing easier intra-operative detection with gamma probe and showing, in this series, a 100% negative predictive value.     

Lymphatic mapping of sentinel nodes in early vulvar cancer

Objective. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using a gamma probe in patients suffering from vulvar cancer.Methods. From May 1998 to November 2000, 26 patients with early vulvar cancer, planned for local wide excision or vulvectomy including groin dissection, were eligible for the study. Two to 3 h before the planned procedure we injected technetium⁹⁹ m-labeled microcolloid intradermally at four locations around the tumor. Dynamic and static images were recorded using a gamma camera. SLN locations were marked on the overlying skin. In the operating theater SLNs were identified at the beginning of the procedure using a handheld gamma-detection probe. After resection of suspected SLNs a standard unilateral or bilateral groin dissection was performed, subsequently followed by local wide excision or, if indicated, radical vulvectomy. Sentinel node detection using technetium⁹⁹ m-labeled microcolloid was compared with final histopathological and immunohistochemical results.Results. Scintigraphy showed focal uptake in all 26 patients. Intraoperatively we detected all sentinel nodes by handheld gamma probe. In 20 patients, one sentinel node was identified unilaterally, while in 6 patients two or more nodes were identified bilaterally. Histologically positive SLNs were found in 9 patients. In our preliminary series we did not find any false-negative SLN.Conclusion. Identification of sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer is feasible with preoperatively administered technetium⁹⁹m-labeled microcolloid. We confirm the results of previous studies and improve the evidence that the SLN procedure could be implemented in future therapy concepts.     

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience about the role of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer patients while debating provocatory arguments concerning this procedure. METHODS: From June 2001 to February 2003, patients affected by stage IB(1) cervical cancer were submitted to the sentinel node biopsy procedure. Patients were submitted to lymphoscintigraphy and, subsequently, to laparoscopy in order to locate the sentinel lymph node. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Sentinel node(s) was(were) identified with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 89% of the patients. Intraoperative detection rate was 70%. During surgery in 31% of the patients, sentinel node was detected bilaterally; in 15%, two sentinel nodes on the same side of the lymphatic vessels were detected. The sentinel node was located at the level of superficial common iliac vessels (26%), external iliac vessels (69%), and superficial obturator vessels (49%). In 77% of the patients, the histologic specimen sent by the surgeon as unique sentinel node contained two or more nodes. Metastatic sentinel nodes were found in 23% of the patients. There was no case with a positive nonsentinel node in the presence of a negative sentinel node. CONCLUSION: Sentinel node detection is a feasible procedure in cervical cancer patients. However, a high percentage of patients is found with bilateral and/or more than one sentinel lymph node. Improvements in detection rate and pathological analysis are needed prior to consider the sentinel node biopsy a routine procedure in cervical cancer patients.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer—Feasibility,safety and lymphatic complications

Objective

To compare the rate of lymphatic complications in women with endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy versus a full pelvic and infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy, and to examine the overall feasibility and safety of the former.