MR imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers: part I. Conventional MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings in cadavers

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the normal anatomy of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the fingers with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR arthrography in cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 20 MCP joints of the fingers of five fresh human cadaveric hands in the extended and flexed positions were obtained before and after arthrography. The MR appearances of all articular and periarticular structures were analyzed and compared with those seen on anatomic sections. Two readers independently graded the visibility of these structures. Interobserver agreement was tested by using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The main collateral ligaments could be best evaluated on the transverse images of flexed fingers. The accessory bands of the collateral ligament complex were best seen on the transverse images of extended fingers. Sagittal MR images were best for evaluating the palmar plate and the capsule. MR arthrography improved the visualization of all articular and periarticular structures. The kappa values related to conventional MR imaging findings at all sequences, 0.42-0.71, indicated moderate to substantial agreement. The kappa values for the MR arthrographic sequences, 0.59-0.74, were slightly higher than those for the nonenhanced sequences. CONCLUSION: Conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography enable accurate visualization of the important anatomic structures of the MCP joints. MR arthrography enhances visualization of the intraarticular elements.     

Metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe: normal MR,MR arthrographic,and MR bursographic findings in cadavers

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the normal anatomy of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of the great toe with MR imaging, MR arthrography, and MR bursography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 12 cadaveric MTP joints of the great toe were obtained before and after arthrography, busography, or both. The MR appearances of all articular and periarticular structures were analyzed and correlated with those seen on anatomic sections. RESULTS: The sesamoid bones and ligaments, the deep transverse metatarsal ligament, and the tendon attachments of the abductor and adductor hallucis muscles were seen best in the coronal plane. The sagittal plane was best for evaluating the plantar plate, the articular cartilage, and the tendon attachments of the flexor and extensor hallucis brevis muscles. The main collateral ligaments were evaluated best in the axial plane. MR arthrography improved the visualization of all articular and periarticular structures except the collateral ligament complexes. MR bursography did not enhance the visualization of these structures. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging and MR arthrography allow accurate visualization of the important anatomic structures in and about the MTP joint of the great toe.     

Lesser metatarsophalangeal joints: standard MR imaging,MR arthrography,and MR bursography--initial results in 48 cadaveric joints

PURPOSE: To delineate the normal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging anatomy of the lesser metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in a cadaveric model and compare the MR arthrographic and MR bursographic findings with the standard MR imaging findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of 48 lesser MTP joints of 12 cadaveric feet was performed. The specimens were subsequently evaluated with MR arthrography, MR bursography, or both examinations. Musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated standard MR images to determine the normal appearances of the joint structures, especially the fibrous capsule, plantar plate, and collateral ligament complex (CLC). Signal intensity, morphology, joint thickness, relationships with adjacent structures, and best plane for analysis were analyzed. The contrast material-enhanced (ie, arthrographic and bursographic) MR imaging findings were compared with the standard MR imaging findings. RESULTS: The coronal plane was best for simultaneous depiction of the fibrous capsule, plantar plate, and collateral ligament complex and for assessment of the relationship between the CLC and the plantar plate. The sagittal plane was best for analysis of the bone attachments of the plantar plate and the transverse plane for evaluation of the CLC attachment sites in the phalanges. MR arthrography enabled identification of the bare areas and recesses of the joints, better delineation of the plantar plate articular surface, and better evaluation of the integrity of the soft-tissue components of the joints. Compared with the other examinations, MR bursography did not help improve these evaluations. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is an excellent examination for delineating the anatomy of the lesser MTP joints. Compared with standard MR imaging, only MR arthrography helps improve visualization of the fibrous capsule, plantar plate, and CLC of the lesser MTP joints.     

Posterior shoulder labrocapsular structures in all aspects; 3D volumetric MR arthrography study

Pathologies of the posterior labrocapsular structures of the shoulder joint are far less common than anterior labrocapsuloligamentous lesions. Most of these pathologies have been associated with traumatic posterior dislocation. A smaller portion of the lesions include posterior extension of superior labral anteroposterior lesions, posterior superior internal impingement, and damage to the posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Labrocapsular anatomic variations of the posterior shoulder joint can mimic labral pathology on conventional MR and occasionally on MR arthrographic images. Knowledge of this variant anatomy is key to interpreting MR images and studying MR arthrography of the posterior labrocapsular structure to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgical procedures. In this article, we review normal and variant anatomy of the posterior labrocapsular structure of the shoulder joint based on MR arthrography and discuss how to discriminate normal anatomic variants from labrocapsular damage.     

MR imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers: part II. Detection of simulated injuries in cadavers

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR arthrography in the diagnosis of the most common traumatic metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint injuries, which were created surgically in cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Injuries to various MCP joint structures were surgically created randomly in 28 fingers of seven human cadaveric hands. Injuries to the main collateral ligaments (CLs) (n = 12), accessory CL (n = 15), sagittal band (n = 14), transverse fibers of the extensor hood (n = 5), first annular pulley (n = 16), deep transverse metacarpal ligament (DTML) (n = 5), and palmar plate (n = 10) were analyzed. Conventional MR images and MR arthrograms were evaluated, with differences in interpretation resolved in consensus. The sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of both MR imaging methods were determined, and the differences were tested for significance by using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 28.6%-93.8% with conventional MR imaging versus 50.0%-93.3% with MR arthrography. Specificity was 66.7%-100% with conventional MR imaging versus 83.3%-100% with MR arthrography. Although the MR arthrographic results usually were higher, the differences were not significant. The kappa values for interobserver agreement were 0.314-0.638 for conventional MR imaging versus 0.364-1.00 for MR arthrography. Sensitivity for the detection of lesions of the main and accessory CLs and the first annular pulley was slightly higher than that for the detection of lesions of the extensor hood, DTML, and palmar plate structures. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and MR arthrography enable the diagnosis of simulated MCP joint injuries. MR arthrography does not have a significant advantage over conventional MR imaging.     

Extrinsic carpal ligaments: normal MR arthrographic appearance in cadavers

PURPOSE: To describe the normal magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic anatomy of the major carpal ligaments (excluding scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments) and their osseous attachments by using standard imaging planes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 22 wrists derived from fresh human cadaveric hands were obtained after tricompartmental arthrography. The MR arthrographic appearance of the carpal ligaments and their bone attachments were analyzed and correlated to those seen on anatomic sections. Two readers determined in consensus which was the best plane to observe the course and attachment sites for each ligament. They further analyzed the size and sites of attachment of these ligaments in two orthogonal planes chosen for optimal viewing. RESULTS: Each ligament was well seen as a hypointense linear structure with MR arthrography. The radioscaphocapitate, radiolunotriquetral, radioscapholunate, dorsal radiotriquetral, palmar scaphotriquetral, and dorsal scaphotriquetral ligaments were best evaluated in the transverse plane. The palmar and dorsal ulnotriquetral and ulnolunate ligaments were best visualized in the sagittal plane. The radial collateral ligament was best analyzed in the coronal plane. The attachment sites of all ligaments were best analyzed either in the transverse or sagittal planes. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography allows visualization of the carpal ligaments. Detailed knowledge of the normal appearance of these ligaments can serve as a baseline for future studies in which MR arthrography is used to characterize wrist instability.     

MR Arthrography of the Hip

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip has been valuable in the diagnosis of occult osseous abnormalities and of periarticular soft tissue disorders. MRI has been less useful in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears and other intra-articular abnormalities. Image optimization is more technically challenging in the hip than in smaller joints because the overlying soft tissues are thicker, resulting in decreased spatial and contrast resolutions that may not be adequate to distinguish the acetabular labrum from subchondral bone, articular cartilage, and joint capsule. MR arthrography (MRA) extends the capabilities of conventional MRI because contrast solution separates intra-articular structures and outlines abnormalities. In hips with suspected acetabular labral injury, arthrographic MR images demonstrate the location and length of tears and the presence of associated capsular defects. Arthrographic MR images may also enable the accurate diagnosis of cartilage lesions and intra-articular loose bodies. This article illustrates normal arthrographic MR features of the hip as well as pathologic disorders of the acetabular labrum, capsule, and articular cartilage     

Superior labral anteroposterior lesions: MR arthrography with arm traction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of arm traction combined with MR arthrography in the evaluation of superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaveric shoulders were studied with a 1.5-T MR imaging unit with the arm externally rotated. Fifteen milliliters of a gadolinium-containing contrast agent were injected into the glenohumeral joint. Twenty-four sets of images of cadaveric joints were evaluated independently by two observers. These sets consisted of MR arthrographic images obtained with traction (applied to the wrist using 1- to 3-kg weights) and without traction in five shoulders in which SLAP lesions had been excluded arthroscopically or by cadaveric sectioning; and MR arthrographic images obtained with and without traction in seven shoulders in which various types of SLAP lesions had been created arthroscopically and later confirmed by cadaveric sectioning. RESULTS: Analysis of the data indicated that MR arthrography in combination with arm traction and external rotation improved diagnostic accuracy with regard to identification and categorization of SLAP lesions when compared with studies made without traction. CONCLUSION: The combination of MR arthrography and arm traction with the shoulder in external rotation provides a more effective approach for detection of SLAP lesions than does similar MR arthrography performed without arm traction.     

MR arthrography of the lower extremity

MR arthrography by virtue of its ability accurately to demonstrate intra-articular structures and abnormalities of these structures has become an important tool for the evaluation of a variety of articular disorders. Although not necessary in all patients, MR arthrography may facilitate the evaluation of patients with suspected intra-articular pathology in whom conventional MRI is not sufficient for an adequate therapy planning. MR arthrography combines the advantages of arthrography, like joint distention and delineation of intra-articular structures, with the superior spatial resolution of MRI. This technique improves diagnostic confidence, particularly in the assessment of subtle lesions and of complex anatomic structures. MR arthrography is of high value in the evaluation of osteochondral defects, loose bodies, previously operated menisci, and acetabular labral lesions.     

MR and CT arthrography of the elbow

Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography has, to a great extent, replaced conventional and CT arthrography as the standard of care imaging tool for indications including medial elbow pain in the throwing athlete, chondral and osteochondral lesions in the elbow, and intra-articular bodies. There are still rare specific incidences where CT arthrography is indicated. This article reviews elbow arthrography, with a greater emphasis placed on MR arthrography, including indications, technique, potential complications, contraindications, equipment, and MR arthrographic pathologies.     

MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to describe the appearance of the acetabular capsular-labral complex on MR arthrography and to correlate this appearance with surgical findings in adult patients and with gross anatomic findings in cadavers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MR arthrography of the hip joint was performed in 40 patients and six cadavers. All patients underwent subsequent arthrotomy of the hip. MR arthrography consisted of a T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence in both the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique planes after intraarticular injection of a 2 mmol/l solution of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The normal and pathologic appearance of the capsular-labral complex was assessed, and the labra were evaluated on the basis of morphology, signal intensity, presence of a tear, and attachment to the acetabulum. MR arthrography findings were correlated with the surgical results in all patients and with the anatomic sections of the cadaveric hip joint specimens. RESULTS: MR arthrography images of the T-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences allowed visualization of the anatomic structures. The normal labrum was triangular, without any sublabral sulcus, and of homogeneous low signal intensity. A recess between the labrum and the joint capsule could be identified in instances in which no thickened labrum was present. Labral lesions included labral degeneration, a tear, or a detached labrum either with or without thickening of the labrum. The sensitivity for detection and correct staging of labral lesions with MR arthrography in the patient study was 91%; the specificity, 71%; and the accuracy, 88%. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography with T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences allows excellent assessment of the normal and pathologic acetabular capsular-labral complex.     

Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the accuracy of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, direct MR arthrography, and indirect MR arthrography in assessment of possible recurrent or residual meniscal tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-four patients who had previously undergone meniscal preservation surgery were prospectively examined with conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography. Ninety-four patients (104 postoperative menisci) underwent subsequent second-look arthroscopic surgery. Each case was evaluated for (a) surfacing intrameniscal intermediate- or T1-weighted signal intensity, (b) surfacing intrameniscal T2-weighted signal intensity, (c) morphologic changes beyond those expected postoperatively, (d) joint effusion on conventional MR or indirect MR arthrographic studies, and (e) overall presence or absence of recurrent meniscal tear. RESULTS: Seventy-one arthroscopically proved recurrent meniscal tears were found. In the diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 86%, 67%, 83%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, for conventional MR imaging; 83%, 78%, 90%, 64%, and 81%, respectively, for indirect MR arthrography; and 90%, 78%, 90%, 78%, and 85%, respectively, for direct MR arthrography. No significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of one method relative to another was observed (P >.54). Surfacing intrameniscal T2-weighted signal intensity was the most specific sign, with the highest positive predictive value of a recurrent tear. CONCLUSION: Although a small incremental increase in accuracy is associated with the use of direct MR arthrography over conventional MR imaging and indirect MR arthrography, no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy among the three techniques was demonstrated for detection of recurrent or residual meniscal tear.     

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: imaging with MR

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies were obtained to evaluate the shape of the cartilaginous femoral head and the adequacy of femoral acetabular containment in 35 children with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). MR results for 24 of the 35 children were compared with results at arthrography. The shape of the cartilaginous femoral head was well identified with MR imaging, but, with arthrography, less information could be obtained about the medial and lateral aspects of the cartilaginous capital epiphyses in nine and three cases, respectively. Thirteen children underwent surgery; remodeling and regained femoroacetabular congruity of the articular surfaces following derotation varus osteotomy was identified in seven of 10 who underwent repeat MR imaging. In addition, MR images and conventional radiographs of the hips were compared. The radiographically identifiable distribution of the bone necrosis of the capital epiphysis correlated well with that demonstrated on MR images. MR imaging is a valuable non-invasive procedure with which to obtain information about the status and treatment of the cartilaginous femoral head in children with LCPD.     

Ligamentous and tendinous anatomy of the intermetacarpal and common carpometacarpal joints: evaluation with MR imaging and MR arthrography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to demonstrate the normal ligamentous and tendinous anatomy of the intermetacarpal (IMC) and common carpometacarpal (CCMC) joints with MRI and MR arthrography. METHOD: MR images of 22 wrists derived from fresh human cadavers were obtained before and after arthrography. The MR imaging features of the ligaments and tendons about the CCMC and IMC joints and the joints themselves were analyzed in a randomized fashion and correlated with those seen on anatomic sections. RESULTS: Six CCMC ligaments were visualized. The dorsal and palmar CCMC ligaments and the pisometacarpal ligament were best visualized in the sagittal plane. The radial and ulnar CCMC collateral ligaments and the capito-third metacarpal ligament were best visualized in the coronal plane. Three main IMC ligaments were observed: a dorsal and a palmar ligament and an interosseous ligament complex. All three ligaments were best visualized in the axial plane. Four tendinous insertions to the metacarpal bases were evident. CONCLUSION: The anatomy of the ligaments and tendinous insertions about the second to fifth IMC and the CCMC joints is well demonstrated by MR imaging and MR arthrography. MR arthrography does not significantly improve the visualization of these complex structures.     

Wrist MR arthrography: how, why, when

MR imaging of the wrist frequently represents a diagnostic challenge for radiologists because of the complex anatomy of this joint, small size of its components, and little known pathologic conditions. MR arthrography combines the advantages of conventional MR imaging and arthrography by improving the visualization of small intra-articular abnormalities. This article reviews the current role of MR arthrography in the evaluation of wrist joint disorders considering the relevant aspects of anatomy, techniques, and applications.     

Normal MR imaging anatomy of the rotator cuff tendons, glenoid fossa, labrum, and ligaments of the shoulder

The shoulder is commonly imaged using MR imaging, with or without intraarticular contrast medium. Some anatomic structures, such as the rotator cuff tendons and bony components, can be assessed without arthrographic technique, whereas the glenohumeral ligaments and labrum require arthrographic technique for more accurate assessment. In either case, an understanding of the normal anatomy of the shoulder with regard to bony and soft tissue structures is essential for MR imaging interpretation. In this article we discuss normal anatomy and variations of the glenohumeral joint(bone and soft tissues), rotator cuff tendons, and coracoacromial arch.     

Anterolateral ankle impingement: mr arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in assessing the anterolateral recess of the ankle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with chronic ankle pain prospectively underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR arthrography of the tibiotalar joint. All underwent clinical examination and were included if anterolateral impingement (n = 13) or a control condition (n = 19; suspected osteochondral defect, intraarticular bodies, instability, osteoarthritis) was diagnosed. MR imaging included transverse and coronal T1-weighted and sagittal T2-weighted imaging sequences. Images were prospectively analyzed by two readers blinded to the clinical diagnosis. The anterolateral gutter contour was assessed. MR arthrographic findings were correlated with subsequent arthroscopic appearances. RESULTS: MR arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral soft tissues had an accuracy of 97%, sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 100%, negative predictive value of 89%, and positive predictive value of 100%. Accuracy was 100% with clinical anterolateral impingement, with an arthroscopically confirmed abnormality in 12 cases and a normal appearance in one. Anterolateral soft-tissue thickening was identified at MR arthrography in 11 control cases, with arthroscopic confirmation in all. The remaining cases had normal appearances, with an arthroscopic soft-tissue abnormality in one case and a normal appearance in seven. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography of the tibiotalar joint is accurate in assessing the anterolateral recess of the ankle.     

Ankle MR arthrography: how, why, when

MR arthrography has become an important tool for the assessment of a variety of ankle disorders. MR arthrography may facilitate the evaluation of patients with suspected intra-articular pathology in whom conventional MR imaging is not sufficient for an adequate diagnosis and be useful for therapy planning. MR arthrography is valuable in the evaluation of ligamentous injuries, impingement syndromes, cartilage lesions, osteochondral lesions of the talus, loose bodies, and several synovial joint disorders. Indirect MR arthrography is a useful adjunct to conventional MR imaging and may be preferable to direct MR arthrography in cases in which an invasive procedure is contraindicated or when fluoroscopy is not available.     

MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip after fluoroscopic landmarking

Purpose. To describe a technique for intra-articular injection in the MR suite after conventional fluoroscopic landmarking in order to streamline MR arthrography. Design and patients. This technique was performed on 33 consecutive patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder to evaluate the glenoid labrum and on 15 consecutive patients referred for MR arthrography of the hip to evaluate the acetabular labrum. The patients were landmarked in the fluoroscopy suite, followed by a conventional MR examination. The intra-articular injection was then performed on the MR table and the MR arthrographic sequences obtained. Results. One of the 48 injections was extra-articular, requiring a second injection. The other injections were performed without incident, and the average total procedure time for all injections was 10 min. Conclusions. This technique is a reliable method of streamlining intra-articular injections when performing conventional MR imaging prior to the MR arthrographic portion of the examination. It shortens the total MR examination time by eliminating a visit to the fluoroscopy suite in the middle of the MR study, and its use of a straight anterior approach for both the shoulder and hip joints should be familiar to most people who perform conventional arthrography. Received: 27 August 1999 Accepted: 26 October 1999     

Assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with dual-detector spiral CT arthrography and MR imaging

PURPOSE: To assess dual-detector spiral CT arthrography in the evaluation of the entire knee cartilage obtained from cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two independent observers characterized articular cartilage in 12 cadaver knees in which MR imaging and dual-detector spiral CT arthrography were performed and compared their findings to those found during macroscopic assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging and spiral CT arthrography for detecting grade 2A or higher and grade 2B or higher cartilage lesions, the Spearman correlation coefficient between arthrographic and macroscopic grading, and kappa statistics for assessing interobserver reproducibility were determined. RESULTS: At spiral CT arthrography, sensitivities and specificities ranged between 80% and 88% for the detection of grade 2A or higher cartilage lesions and ranged between 85% and 94% for the detection of grade 2B or higher cartilage lesions. At MR imaging, sensitivities and specificities ranged between 78% and 86% and between 76% and 91% for the detection of grade 2A or higher and grade 2B or higher cartilage lesions, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients between spiral CT arthrography or MR imaging and macroscopic grading of articular surfaces were 0.797 and 0.702, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual-detector spiral CT arthrography of the knee is a valuable method for the assessment of open cartilage lesions of the entire knee.