ELISA-based detection of C4d after liver transplantation — A helpful tool for differential diagnosis between acute rejection and HCV-recurrence?

Hepatitis-C is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV is universal leading to graft failure in up to 40% of all patients. The differentiation between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis-C is crucial as rejection treatments are likely to aggravate HCV-recurrence. Histological examination of liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection but has failed in the past to distinguish between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis-C.In a retrospective study we have recently reported that C4d as a marker of the activated complement cascade is detectable in a hepatic specimen in acute rejection after liver transplantation and may serve as a valuable tool in differential diagnosis between ACR and HCV-recurrence.We performed a prospective analysis by ELISA measurement of C4d concentration in cryo-preserved liver biopsies of LTX patients who had either experienced acute rejection, hepatitis-C recurrence or displayed no pathological alterations (controls).Opposed to our immunohistologically based findings in paraffinized tissue we were unable to detect significant differences of C4d concentration in ELISA of cryo-preserved liver tissue.Consequently the role and potential value of C4d as a diagnostic marker may not be determined using ELISA-based tissue evaluation.     

Hepatocellular MxA protein expression supports the differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C disease from acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

MacQuillan GC, de Boer WB, Allan JE, Platten MA, Reed WD, Jeffrey GP. Hepatocellular MxA protein expression supports the differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C disease from acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01068.x
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease from acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation can be difficult. Previously, we have found that MxA protein, a specific and sensitive marker for type 1 interferon production, is strongly expressed in chronic HCV disease. Here, we investigate MxA expression as a marker for recurrent HCV disease in the livers of 14 adult HCV patients who underwent liver transplantation. Serial liver biopsies available for 12 of these patients were stained for MxA protein and scored using a semi‐quantitative approach. Hepatocellular MxA protein levels were significantly up‐regulated (p = 0.025) in recurrent HCV disease in comparison to ACR. In biopsies that showed histological changes consistent with recurrent HCV disease, strong hepatocellular MxA staining was present in 14/18 (78%). In the liver biopsies with histological evidence of ACR, strong MxA hepatocellular staining was present in only three of 10 (30%). Thus, assessment of hepatocellular MxA protein expression can contribute to the differential diagnosis of ACR and recurrent HCV disease following liver transplantation. In conclusion, analysis of intrahepatic MxA levels has the potential to reduce the inappropriate use with high‐dose pulsing of steroids post‐operatively.     

Significance of C4d deposition in the diagnosis of rejection after liver transplantation

C4d immunohistochemical staining of liver allograft biopsies was performed to assess its relationship to other pathological changes in the liver. C4d deposition was detected in 69.2% of liver graft biopsies from patients under going rejection, 33.3% of liver graft biopsies from patients with hepatitis B relapse after transplantation, and 28.6% of liver biopsies from patients with hepatitis B. When rejection occurred C4d deposition was located in the vascular walls of portal areas and hepatic sinusoidal walls. Examination of biopsies from patients with hepatitis B relapse after transplantation or hepatitis B infection showed C4d deposition only in the vascular walls of the portal area. C4d deposition in both vascular walls of portal area and hepatic sinusoidal walls was detected in only one of 12 ischemia-reperfusion damage cases. Repeated biopsy of the same patient 1 month later revealed acute cellular rejection. No C4d deposition was found in biopsies from a patient with bile duct occlusion after liver transplantation. C4d might serve as a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of liver rejection.     

c-Kit-positive mast cells in portal tracts cannot be used to distinguish acute cellular rejection from recurrent hepatitis C infection in liver allografts

Cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV infection in the liver allograft occurs at a high rate. The differentiation of recurrent HCV infection from acute cellular rejection (ACR) represents a difficult challenge in transplantation pathology. The c-Kit receptor is a tyrosine kinase membrane protein encoded by the c-Kit proto-oncogene, which is expressed on mast cells and on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Mast cells are important effector cells of a broad range of immune responses. Recently, c-Kit+ mast cells were shown to form part of the inflammatory infiltrate in acute liver allograft rejection. A strong relationship was found between c-Kit+ cell densities and increasingly severe rejection. The present study sought to determine whether the presence of c-Kit+ cells could be used to distinguish between ACR and recurrent HCV in liver allografts. Immunohistochemical staining for c-Kit was performed on 20 transplant biopsy specimens from 10 patients with mild to moderate ACR and 10 other patients with recurrent hepatitis C. The number of c-Kit+ cells per portal tract varied with the density of the overall inflammatory infiltrate. There was no significant difference between the number of c-Kit+ cells in the biopsy specimens that carried a diagnosis of ACR and those from patients who had been diagnosed as having recurrent HCV. It was concluded that immunohistochemical staining for the presence of c-Kit+ mast cells cannot be used to differentiate between ACR and recurrent HCV infection in liver allograft biopsy specimens.     

Measurement of CD4+ T‐cell function in predicting allograft rejection and recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Hashimoto K, Miller C, Hirose K, Diago T, Aucejo F, Quintini C, Eghtesad B, Corey R, Yerian L, Lopez R, Zein N, Fung J. Measurement of CD4+ T‐cell function in predicting allograft rejection and recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01169.x
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be difficult to distinguish from acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation. The Cylex Immune Function Assay (ImmuKnow) provides objective measure of recipient’s immune function. The goal is to assess the ability of this assay to distinguish these similar conditions. A retrospective review was performed in 54 recipients with HCV. ImmuKnow assays were measured with allograft biopsies. Levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release from CD4+ T cells (ng/mL) were compared with the following biopsy result classifications: 365 ± 130 with ACR (n = 11), 152 ± 100 with recurrent HCV (n = 26), 240 ± 71 with normal biopsies (n = 12), and 157 ± 130 with overlapping features of ACR and recurrent HCV (n = 5). Recipients with recurrent HCV had lower immune response than those with ACR (p < 0.0001).Using a cutoff level of 220, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing two conditions were 88.5% and 90.9%, respectively. When recipients with overlapping features had low immune response, three of four recipients’ subsequent biopsies showed recurrent HCV. In conclusion, the ImmuKnow assay can be a sensitive and specific additional test for distinguishing recurrent HCV from ACR and may be useful for predicting which recipients may be most vulnerable to recurrent HCV.     

Characterization of CD4, CD8, CD56 positive lymphocytes and C4d deposits to distinguish acute cellular rejection from recurrent hepatitis C in post-liver transplant biopsies

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection is the most common cause for liver transplantation (LTx) in USA. Hepatitis C viral recurrence in liver allograft is almost universal, which is often difficult to distinguish from acute cellular rejection (ACR). AIM: Aim of the present study is to examine the differences between distribution of CD4, CD8, CD56 positive lymphocytes, and C4d deposits in patients with ACR and recurrent HCV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As a pilot project, a group of five post-LTx HCV RNA negative patients, strongly suspicious for ACR based on clinical findings and history of medication non-compliance and another group of five post-LTx HCV positive, medication compliant patients with abnormal liver function were retrospectively selected. Liver biopsies of these patients were stained with monoclonal CD4, CD8, CD56, and polyclonal C4d antibodies and compared. RESULTS: Mean CD4, CD8, and CD56 counts in ACR group were 156.7 +/- 17.6, 35.4 +/- 8.8, and 1.0 +/- 1.8/HPF, respectively and were 89.7 +/- 41.3, 20.3 +/- 23.2, and 0.6 +/- 0.9/HPF, respectively in HCV recurrence group. Biopsies of four of five patients with ACR demonstrated moderate to strong C4d staining, whereas all patients with recurrent HCV had none to mild C4d staining. CONCLUSION: Mean CD4, CD8, and CD56 were similar for acute rejection and recurrent HCV infection. However, 80% of patients with ACR showed moderate to strong staining for C4d and all recurrent HCV patients showed none to mild C4d staining.     

Hepatitis C: indication for anti-viral therapy?

Abstract  Hepatitis C infection is a frequent indication for liver transplantation. In general, recurrent graft hepatitis is assumed to be mild, but may be the cause of lethal postoperative complications in a small patient population. Out of 500 transplants in 458 patients, 123 patients were transplanted due to hepatitis C infection (26.7 %) between September 1988 and April 1994. Cumulative 1– to 6-year patient survival was similar for patients transplanted due to hepatitis C (87.0 %) and those transplanted for other indications (86.0 %). In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), death, in 50 % of the cases, was related to HCV recurrence and chronic rejection. Four patients (25.0 %) died because of severe infection and multiple organ failure syndrome unrelated to HCV recurrence and chronic rejection. The incidence of retransplantation was similar in HCV (9.8 %) and other patients (8.4 %). In HCV patients, 6 of 12 retransplantations (50.0 %) were performed due to HCV recurrence and chronic rejection. Of 123 HCV patients, 45 experienced histo-logically proven recurrent graft hepatitis between 2 weeks and 5.5 years after transplantation. The incidence of acute rejection was similar in both groups. The incidence of steroid-resistant rejection was, however, higher in HCV patients (29.3 %) than in those transplanted for other indications (14.5 %; P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant association between acute rejection and the development of recurrent graft hepatitis. In conclusion, patients with hepatitis C may be transplanted with as good patient and graft survival rates as patients transplanted for other indications. However, the combination of recurrent graft hepatitis and chronic rejection remains the most limiting factor for some of these patients, which strengthens the necces-sity for a specific anti-viral therapy.     

Is hepatitis C virus recurrence a risk factor for chronic liver allograft rejection?

Abstract  Several risk factors have been reported that may favour the development of chronic rejection. From October 1988 to December 1993, 97 liver transplants with survival of more than 3 months were included in the study. Fifty-two patients (54.1 %) had chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection before liver transplantation. Immunosup-pression consisted of cyclosporine A and prednisone, whereas 14 patients received FK 506 and prednisone. Severe graft HCV reinfection was present in 32 patients (61.5 %) after liver transplantation and chronic graft hepatitis C was found in 26 cases at the end of the study. Chronic rejection occurred in 8 of 97 allografts (8.25 %); 5 presented chronic rejection and concomitant chronic graft hepatitis C. The incidence of chronic rejection in patients with HCV infection before liver transplantation (9.6 %) did not differ when compared with the negative HCV patients (6.6 %). However, when the 26 cases that developed graft dysfunction due to chronic hepatitis C after liver transplantation were considered, 5 presented chronic rejection, a significantly higher incidence than in the remaining patients (3 of 71) (Yates chi-square test: P < 0.05). In our experience, there appears to be a relationship between the development of chronic rejection and chronic hepatitis C in the graft after liver transplantation.     

Seroprevalence and outcome of hepatitis C in liver transplantation

A recombinant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by a neutralization test (NT) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) were used for the detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 71 patients receiving 84 orthotopic liver grafts between 1984 and 1990. Before the liver transplantation (LTX) anti-HCV was present in six of the 71 recipients (8.5%) who were accepted for LTX because of acute or chronic liver failure. After LTX anti-HCV could not be detected in one of the patients, but it was continuously present in the others for more than 12 months. Detectable HCV antibodies were not present in the three patients who underwent LTX because of clinical evidence of fulminant NANB hepatitis. Two of 48 (4.2%) previously HCV seronegative recipients, who survived more than 3 months, seroconverted 9 and 16 months, respectively, after transplantation. The postoperative seroconversion was probably due to the transfer of virus via perioperative blood transfusions. Thus, these liver recipients may be able to respond by producing anti-HCV despite immuno-suppressive therapy. None of the seven post-transplant HCV-seropositive patients developed symptoms such as icterus or fatigue, which would suggest the presence of liver insufficiency due to HCV infection. However, two of them had increased transaminase levels and histological signs of mild hepatitis. No significant difference was found in 1-year survival, prothrombin complex, albumin levels or the risk for retransplantation in post-transplant anti-HCV-seropositive patients, compared with those without detectable HCV antibodies (71% vs 69%, respectively). Thus, during the study period of 1–5 years, the clinical course of HCV infection was milder than that reported for hepatitis B infection in liver recipients.     

Timing of reinfection and mechanisms of hepatocellular damage in transplanted hepatitis C virus[ndash ]reinfected liver

Pathogenic mechanisms and dynamics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are poorly defined. This study focuses on these aspects by studying 55 frozen biopsy specimens from transplant recipients with various histological diagnoses obtained from 4 days to 4 years post-OLT and 10 patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis. The percentage of HCV-infected hepatocytes, number and distribution of CD8 and natural killer cells, and rates of hepatocellular apoptosis and proliferation were quantified by immunohistochemistry. HCV antigens were detected in 37% of biopsy specimens obtained within 20 days and 90% of biopsy specimens obtained from 21 days to 6 months after OLT. The number of HCV-infected hepatocytes was never less than 40% in acute hepatitis specimens and never greater than 30% in the other cases. Hepatocellular apoptosis was high in biopsy specimens of acute hepatitis and moderate in those from transplant recipients with normal histological characteristics, but still greater than in specimens of chronic active hepatitis. Proliferation correlated significantly with apoptosis. Lymphocyte infiltration was high and similar among cases of acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, and rejection. These data: (1) show that the detection of liver HCV antigens is sensitive enough to be used in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool to detect infection of the transplanted liver and might be useful, combined with conventional histological evaluation to detect hepatitic damage, for therapeutic decision making; (2) suggest direct cytotoxicity of HCV, as well as immunologic mechanisms possibly prevalent in chronic hepatitis and rejection, at least in the phase of acute massive liver infection; and (3) show that hepatocellular apoptosis and regeneration might be active enough to lead to replacement of the entire transplanted liver in 2 weeks. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:10-20.)     

Effects of interferon treatment on liver histology and allograft rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation.

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation remains a significant cause of graft loss and retransplantation. Although treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based regimens has become widely accepted as safe and can lead to sustained virologic clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, long-term histologic improvement and the risk of precipitating graft rejection remain controversial. The present study is a retrospective evaluation of the clinical and histological consequences of treating recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based therapy in a selected group of liver transplant recipients. Twenty-three liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C and histologic evidence of progressive fibrosis completed at least 6 months of interferon, 83% of whom received pegylated-interferon alpha-2b; only 4 tolerated ribavirin. Overall, 11 patients (48%) had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of 6 months of treatment. Of these patients, 3 remained HCV RNA-negative on maintenance interferon monotherapy for 33 months, and the other 8 (35%) completed treatment and remained HCV RNA-undetectable 24 weeks after discontinuation of interferon. Overall necroinflammatory activity in liver biopsies obtained 2 years after HCV RNA became undetectable decreased significantly (7.73 +/- 2.37 vs. 5.64 +/- 2.94 units before and after treatment, respectively; P =.016). However, 5 of these 11 patients had no histologic improvement in follow-up liver histology. Liver biopsies in the 12 nonresponders demonstrated disease progression. Of the 23 patients treated with interferon, 8 (35%) had evidence of acute or chronic rejection on posttreatment liver biopsy, most of whom had no previous history of rejection (P <.01 for comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment prevalence of histologic rejection), and 2 experienced graft loss from chronic rejection, requiring retransplantation. In conclusion, interferon treatment of recurrent hepatitis C does not consistently improve histologic disease after virologic response, and it may increase the risk of allograft rejection.     

Liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

End-stage liver disease associated with HCV infection has become one of the leading indications for liver transplantation and it is the most common disease recurring after liver transplantation. The aim of this retrospective study was to asses factors potentially affecting outcome in patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease. Among 164 adult patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation from December 1994 to December 2002, 134 survived >2 months, including 25 with HCV-related liver disease. Mean follow-up after LTx was 24.8 months (range, 2.1-99.4). Anti-HCV was negative in all donors. The parameters considered in our analysis were: the course, outcome, and liver function tests at 1-year follow-up after HCV reinfection: the potential impact of maintenance and induction immunosuppressive regimens; and episodes of acute rejection. Deterioration of graft function because of HCV reinfection occurred in 16 patients (64%). Mean time for deterioration of liver function related to reinfection was 4.5 months (range, 0.83-23). Induction and maintenance immunosuppression did not affect outcome of HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Aminotransferases were significantly higher among HCV-infected recipients than among the other patients in our series. There was a slight tendency for earlier recurrence of HCV hepatitis among patients treated with high-dose steroids because of acute rejection.     

Apoptosis and the expression of Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) antigen in rejection and reinfection in liver allograft specimens

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To investigate the frequency of apoptosis and the expression of Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) in liver allografts, we examined 97 biopsy specimens from 62 patients after orthotopic liver transplantation. The results of the biopsies were as follows: acute allograft rejection (n=32); hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection (n=18); cytomegalovirus infection (n=5); acute rejection plus HCV reinfection (n=3); and stable graft function (n=30); and after treatment of acute rejection (n=9). RESULTS: Apoptotic cells were found in all cases examined, and their frequency increased significantly during acute rejection (0.17 vs. 9.0; P<0.05). The immunoreactivity of Fas and FasL antigen was higher in specimens with acute rejection than in those with stable graft function. Increased apoptosis, Fas, and FasL expression, however, were also seen in HCV reinfection. CONCLUSION: We conclude that apoptosis plays an important role in the hepatocellular damage observed in acute rejection and also in HCV reinfection. However, these parameters are, taken by themselves, not useful as indicators of acute rejection or HCV reinfection.     

Morphologic features of hepatitis C recurrence in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation-preliminary analysis of our case observations

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is almost universal in patients after liver transplantation. The diagnosis of reinfection is more difficult than that of a primary process, as shown by our pathomorphologic analysis of cases of HCV recurrence. MATERIAL: During 5.5 years, 240 liver biopsies included 54 obtained from liver transplant recipients with primary HCV infections, among whom 26 (56.5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of hepatitis. Nineteen patients from this population underwent 30 liver biopsies. In addition, seven biopsies were performed in five patients without clinical signs of reinfection. RESULTS: In 44.2% of patients with HCV recurrence and 15% without reinfection, the intensity of the primary process in the native livers was assessed as high. Reinfection was found in all patients with liver carcinoma and 67% with hepatocyte dysplasia. Histologic signs of infection were estimated as minimal (n = 4), mild (n = 19), or moderate (n = 4). In five patients with reinfections and one without recurrence, histologic manifestations of acute rejection were also observed. In conclusion, HCV was the indication for liver transplantation in 22.4% cases. Clinical manifestation of recurrence was found in 56.5% of the patients, who tended to be older than those without disease recurrence. Upon microscopy, lobular lesions predominated over the portal changes. Factors predisposing to HCV recurrence were coexistence of other liver disorders, a high intensity of the inflammatory process, hepatocyte dysplasia, and/or hepatocellular carcinoma in the native liver and acute rejection episodes.     

Liver Transplantation from an Identical Twin without Immunosuppression, with Early Recurrence of Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus reinfection after liver transplantation is universal and more severe than in nontransplant patients. Rejection episodes and immunosuppressive agents are considered risk factors for deterioration of recurrent hepatitis C. We report 2 cases of living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis who received right-lobe grafts from an identical twin. Thanks to genetic identity, no immunosuppressive drugs were administered during or after transplantation without rejection. Hepatitis C virus RNA kinetics showed a rapid increase following transplantation and liver biopsies 1 month after transplantation showed acute lobular hepatitis in both cases. Antiviral therapy using interferon alpha and ribavirin was started immediately, and both cases showed virological and histological response. In conclusion, avoidance of immunosuppression did not delay hepatitis C recurrence following transplantation, while early antiviral therapy without risk of rejection or immunosuppression led to successful viral eradication.     

The Influence of Viral Genotypes and Rejection Episodes on the Recurrence of Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation

Purpose. The aim of this study was to report the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype and rejection episodes on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), hepatitis recurrence, and progression to graft cirrhosis after OLT. Methods. Fifty-three patients who all had undergone OLT for end-stage liver cirrhosis were selected for this study. Hepatitis C genotype was determined. Recurrent hepatitis and rejection were diagnosed based on elevated liver function tests and a liver biopsy. Results. The patients were followed up for a mean of 51.9 ± 34.3 months. The cumulative survival rate was no different in OLT for hepatitis C and OLT for all other liver diseases. After OLT, serum HCV RNA was detected in 93%. Histological recurrence occurred in 85% of all patients. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence rates were 48%, 77%, and 85%, respectively. Of the 41 patients with recurrent hepatitis C, 4 (10%) had cirrhosis, 18 (44%) had hepatitis with fibrosis, and 91 (46%) had hepatitis without fibrosis at the end of follow-up. A total of 32% of the patients were infected by HCV genotype 1b and 68% by other HCV genotypes. The recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients infected with genotype 1b than in those with other genotypes (p = 0.04). Twenty of 48 patients (42%) experienced acute rejection. There was a strong association between the number of rejection episodes and the incidence of HCV-related cirrhosis (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Our findings showed the genotype 1b to result in a higher recurrence rate after OLT. On the other hand, rejection episodes were associated with a more rapid progression to graft cirrhosis. Received: May 7, 2002 / Accepted: November 19, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Reprint requests to: H. Sugo     

Hepatitis C etiology of liver disease is strongly associated with early acute rejection following liver transplantation.

Although recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) occurs universally after liver transplantation (LT), its tempo and severity are variable and unpredictable. Diagnosis and treatment of early acute rejection (EAR) likely affect the course of recurrent HCV disease. We have studied a contemporary cohort of LT recipients to reexamine risk factors for EAR. We hypothesized that HCV etiology may represent a significant risk factor for EAR for many reasons. First, recurrent disease commonly causes biochemical abnormalities prompting allograft biopsy. Second, overlapping histologic features of acute rejection and recurrent HCV ambiguity may result in diagnostic ambiguity. Finally, the biology of hepatitis may precipitate an antidonor response in addition to an antiviral response. Records of 285 adult recipients undergoing primary LT for cirrhosis between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2002, were retrospectively reviewed. EAR was defined as a biopsy-proven or an empirically treated episode within 6 months of LT. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified donor, recipient, transplant, and posttransplant characteristics associated with EAR; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess rejection by etiology. HCV cirrhosis was the etiology for 51% of all LT recipients. There were 135 episodes of EAR (127 biopsy proven) in 117 recipients for an overall incidence of 41%. Patient groups with HCV and cholestatic / autoimmune disease groups exhibited the highest incidence of rejection at 49%. Recipient gender, ethnicity, etiology, LT year, and posttransplant immunosuppression levels were risk factors for EAR in univariate analysis; HCV etiology and female gender remained robust risk factors in multivariate analysis. Interferon-based therapy did not impact the incidence or timing of EAR. In conclusion, HCV etiology is strongly associated with EAR. HCV allograft reinfection may create an immunologic environment predisposed to EAR. Alternatively, the association of HCV and EAR may result from an increased frequency of allograft biopsy and may be further exacerbated by inability to accurately diagnose EAR in the setting of recurrent HCV.     

原位肝移植术后丙型肝炎的防治

目的 研究肝移植术后丙型肝炎的预防及复发后治疗方法。方法 收集我院2001年8月至2004年3月4例因丙型肝炎所致肝功能衰竭或原发性肝癌行同种异体原位肝移植术的病人资料，探讨肝移植后丙型肝炎预防及肝炎复发后的治疗措施。结果4名病人中，2名病人术后血丙肝病毒RNA检测阳性，以干扰素（IFN—a2b）和病毒唑（Ribavirin）行预防性治疗。在15个月的随访中，1名病人病毒完全清除；另1名病人在预防性治疗过程中，丙肝复发。治疗后，生化指标、病毒学指标及组织学检查皆有改善，但病毒未获得完全清除。另外2名病人术后血丙肝病毒RNA检测阴性，未进行预防性治疗，1名病人随访12个月，病毒学检查仍为阴性；1名病人围手术期死亡。结论初步结果表明，IFN—a2b联合Ribavirin在肝移植后丙型肝炎的预防和治疗中是比较有效、完全的。     

Incidence and outcome of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (OLT). Fifty-two transplanted patients were studied. Serum samples were examined for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) and HCV-RNA by PCR, before and after OLT. Patients were distributed into two groups: group 1 consisted of 24 patients (pretransplant anti-HCV positive) and group 2 consisted of 28 patients (pretransplant anti-HCV negative). One year after OLT, HCV-infected patients were evaluated by liver biopsy. HCV-RNA was detected in 28 of the 52 (53.9%) patients after OLT. Twenty-two patients in group 1 (96%) were reinfected. In group 2, acquired HCV infection was detected in six (21.4%) patients. At 6 and 12 months, one and five of six patients had seroconverted, respectively. Liver biopsy in 23 HCV-infected patients showed chronic hepatitis in 18 (78%) cases (2, chronic persistent hepatitis; 3, chronic lobular hepatitis and 13, chronic active hepatitis). Fourteen of the 23 (60.8 %) patients were asymptomatic. Most symptomatic patients had chronic hepatitis with cholestasis. Overall, 18 of 20 cases of chronic hepatitis diagnosed in OLT recipients were HCV related. Mortality beyond 6 months after OLT was slightly higher in the HCV-infected group ( P = 0.055). In conclusion, HCV reinfection is almost universal. Acquired HCV infection post-OLT is frequent. HCV-infected patients frequently develop chronic hepatitis. Most chronic hepatitis after transplantation are HCV related.     

Treatment for Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Liver Transplantation

Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the current leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in the world. This series reports our program's experience with the treatment of HCV infection after the development of histological hepatitis. Between March 2002 and June 2008, patients with recurrent HCV were selected for treatment if the liver biopsy showed at least the F2 degree of Metavir score. HCV viral load was measured at 4, 12 and 24 weeks as well as at the end of treatment and at 6 months thereafter for patients who became HCV RNA negative (sustained virological response [SVR]). In this period, we performed 287 liver transplantations in 279 patients, including 117 (42%) who had HCV cirrhosis as the indication for OLT of whom 25 were eligible for antiviral treatment. Twelve patients completed treatment, 7 remain on treatment, and 6 were discontinued. The principal collateral effect was anemia. Only 1 patient had an episode of acute cellular rejection, which responded to adjustment of immunosuppression. Antiviral treatment in transplanted patients was feasible and did not seem to induce severe immunological effects. Adjuvant therapies to reduce cytopenias are frequently required, principally erythropoietin. The best results were observed with the pegylated interferon alfa (PEG) plus ribavirin (RBV) group: 38.9% of SVR. We recommend antiviral treatment of eligible patients with confirmed HCV recurrence using PEG plus RBV.