Incidence,nature, and temporal trends of adverse events associated with noncardiac procedures among veterans with drug‐eluting coronary artery stents

Background: The incidence of adverse events with noncardiac procedures (NCP) after the use of drug eluting stents (DES) is not well studied. We sought to determine the incidence and temporal trends of adverse events in patients undergoing NCP after coronary DES. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving DES during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Lexington VAMC between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2010 to determine the circumstances and the results of their NCP. Results: We identified 1,092 patients who underwent at least one PCI with DES who were followed for at least 3 years. Of those, 452 patients (41%) had a NCP at a median of 534 days after PCI with 1,081 procedures (894 low‐, 160 Intermediate‐, and 27 high‐risk) performed. Clinically relevant NCP‐related complications were defined as significant bleeding or stent thrombosis and occurred in 13 individuals (nine perioperative bleeding and four probable/possible stent thrombosis including two mortalities). Five adverse events occurred within the first year at a rate of 0.014 event/patient‐year. During the remainder of follow‐up (up to 9 years), eight events were documented at a rate of 0.0004 event/patient‐years. During the first year of follow‐up, there was no significant increase in risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) in patients undergoing NCP but higher risk of all‐cause mortality in those who did not undergo NCP. However, in patients who underwent NCP, there was a statistically significant increase in myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and rehospitalization for cardiac reasons compared with those without NCP during long term follow‐up (median of 5.6 years). Conclusion: NCP after DES requiring management of DAT are relatively common among veterans following PCI using DES. The risk of bleeding and stent thrombosis is concentrated in the first year but remains very low. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Increased incidence of stent thrombosis in patients with cocaine use.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary stent thrombosis is a rare occurrence in the era of dual-antiplatelet therapy. It is not known whether patients who use cocaine have a higher risk of thrombosis following coronary stent placement. METHODS: We studied 247 consecutive patients who underwent coronary stent placement at an inner-city hospital. RESULTS: Twelve patients (4.9%) were actively using cocaine at the time of PCI. Of these twelve patients, four patients presented with stent thrombosis (33%) at a mean of 51 +/- 40 days (median 45 days), after the index revascularization procedure. Only 2 of the 235 patients without documented cocaine use (0.85%) had stent thrombosis during the same period (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The patients who actively use cocaine have a markedly higher risk of stent thrombosis when compared with patients without a documented history of cocaine use. We discuss various factors that potentially predispose cocaine users to stent thrombosis.     

Recurrent coronary stent thromboses and myocardial infarctions

Although stent thrombosis is a recognized complication of coronary intervention, recurrent stent thrombosis is rarely reported. We present a patient who suffered 3 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions associated with repeated stent thromboses within a month and a half. Although a potentially mechanical cause of thrombosis was identified in the only baremetal stent implanted in this case, no predisposing factors were seen for the 2 drug-eluting stents (DES). While recent worrisome data have suggested a slight increase in the incidence of late angiographic stent thrombosis (defined as occurring beyond 30 days) with drug-eluting stents (DES), their risk of subacute thrombosis (from 1 to 30 days) is reported to be equivalent to that of BMS. Therefore, this rare occurrence serves as a sobering reminder of the risks of subacute thrombosis with both BMS and DES. Marked neointimal inhibition, allergic reactions, as well as thienopyridine resistance, may all contribute to the pathophysiology of DES thrombosis. The Food and Drug Administration advisory panel has concluded that when these devices are used for "on-label" indications, the counterbalance of dramatic target lesion revascularization reduction versus rare incidence of late angiographic stent thrombosis results in no overall increase in DES myocardial infarction or mortality risk. Furthermore, a minimum of 1 year of dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended for all recipients of DES at low risk of bleeding.     

Clinical and angiographic outcome after angiography-guided stent placement in small coronary vessels

BACKGROUND: Although it is widely accepted that stenting confers favorable angiographic and clinical results in coronary arteries >/=3.0 mm in diameter, the outcome of stent placement in smaller vessels remains largely unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We sought to specifically determine the early and long-term clinical outcomes in a large series of 197 consecutive patients who underwent stent placement in 207 vessels <3.0 mm in diameter. Procedural success, accomplished in 97.3%, was accompanied by a significant reduction in lesion severity from 85% +/- 9% before to 3% +/- 7% diameter stenosis after the procedure (P =.0001) and a 0.5% incidence of subacute stent thrombosis. At 1 and 2 years of follow-up, survival rate without major target lesion-driven events was observed in 77.3% and 73.9% of patients, respectively. Repeat revascularization procedures accounted for most of these events; cardiac deaths (including those related to subacute stent thrombosis) and late (>30 days) myocardial infarctions were infrequent (2.4% and 1.0%, respectively). The 6-month angiographic binary instent restenosis rate was 30.1%. On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (P =. 0275), small baseline reference vessel size (P =.0300), and stent size 相似文献   

REVIEW: Stent Thrombosis—Risk Assessment and Prevention

The development and use of stents has made percutaneous coronary intervention an effective (less restenosis), safe (treatment of emergency vessel closure during balloon angioplasty), and applicable (stents were developed for lesions of tortuous anatomy and complex situations) revascularization method. These features have firmly established stenting as first‐line therapy in coronary revascularization. This life‐saving device carries, however, the risk of a life‐threatening complication—stent thrombosis. The article summarizes the facts about the incidence, histopathology, and risk factors of bare‐metal as well as drug‐eluting stent thrombosis. Future directions in reducing the incidence of stent thrombosis are also outlined.     

Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Purpose

Drug-eluting stents are commonly used for percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite excellent clinical efficacy, the association between drug-eluting stents and the risk for late thrombosis remains imprecisely defined.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis on 14 contemporary clinical trials that randomized 6675 patients to drug-eluting stents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared with bare metal stents. Eight of these trials have reported more than a year of clinical follow-up.

Results

The incidence of very late thrombosis (>1 year after the index procedure) was 5.0 events per 1000 drug-eluting stent patients, with no events in bare metal stent patients (risk ratio [RR] = 5.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 19.52, P = .02). Among sirolimus trials, the incidence of very late thrombosis was 3.6 events per 1000 sirolimus stent patients, with no events in bare metal stent patients (RR = 3.99, 95% CI, .45 to 35.62, P = .22). The median time of late sirolimus stent thrombosis was 15.5 months, whereas with bare metal stents it was 4 months. Among paclitaxel trials, the incidence of very late thrombosis was 5.9 events per 1000 paclitaxel stent patients, with no events in bare metal stent patients (RR = 5.72, 95% CI, 1.08 to 32.45, P = .049). The median time of late paclitaxel stent thrombosis was 18 months, whereas it was 3.5 months in bare metal stent patients.

Conclusions

Although the incidence of very late stent thrombosis more than 1 year after coronary revascularization is low, drug-eluting stents appear to increase the risk for late thrombosis. Although more of this risk was seen with paclitaxel stents, it remains possible that sirolimus stents similarly increase the risk for late thrombosis compared with bare metal stents.     

Safety of Prasugrel in Indian patients – Multicentric registry of 1000 cases

Background

Clopidogrel has been the only available antiplatelet drug used along with aspirin in patients of ACS. In recent years 2 new antiplatelet drugs (Prasugrel and Ticagrelor) have become available. Prasugrel in the dose of 10 mg OD has been found to be more efficacious but with increased risk of major bleeding. For this reason it has not gained widespread usage in ACS patients undergoing PCI. There are no systematic data on the use of Prasugrel in Indian population.

Method

This is a prospective, multicentric, hospital registry of 1000 patients with ACS undergoing PCI who were administered Prasugrel. The primary safety endpoint of this study was major and minor bleeding while the efficacy endpoint is the composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke up to 30 days after PCI. Patients with high bleeding risk were excluded.

Results

Most patients (91%) received loading dose of Prasugrel along with the maintenance dose getting according to the defined protocol. Patients were followed up to 30 days post procedure. Primary efficacy end point was reached in 3 patients only with two of them dying due to possible stent thrombosis and the third requiring revascularization of the target vessel for stent thrombosis. One major and 19 minor bleeding complications were recorded, with access site bleeding in 0.7% & non-access site bleeding in 1.2% of the subjects.

Conclusion

Prasugrel was found to be effective & not associated with a high incidence of bleeding in the high risk ACS patients when those at a high bleeding risk were excluded.     

Late and very late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: evolving concepts and perspectives

Coronary stents are the mainstay of percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures and have significantly decreased the rates of acute vessel closure and restenosis. Stent thrombosis (ST) after percutaneous coronary intervention is an uncommon and potentially catastrophic event that might manifest as myocardial infarction and sudden death. Optimization of stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy have markedly reduced the occurrence of this complication. Bare-metal stent (BMS) thrombosis occurs in <1% of the cases, usually within the first month after implantation. The advent of drug-eluting stents (DES) has raised concerns regarding later occurrence of ST, beyond the traditional 1-month timeframe, especially in complex lesion subsets that were excluded from randomized trials that compared BMS to DES. There is widespread controversy regarding the actual incremental risk associated with DES. Recent studies suggest a 0.5% increased long-term thrombosis risk with DES; however, the clinical significance of these events remains under debate. The degree of protection achieved by dual antiplatelet therapy and optimal duration of treatment are under investigation. Novel stent designs might potentially decrease the incidence of this event. In this review, we will describe the current knowledge of the pathophysiology of late DES thrombosis, although many aspects remain incompletely understood.     

Late and very late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: evolving concepts and perspectives.

Coronary stents are the mainstay of percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures and have significantly decreased the rates of acute vessel closure and restenosis. Stent thrombosis (ST) after percutaneous coronary intervention is an uncommon and potentially catastrophic event that might manifest as myocardial infarction and sudden death. Optimization of stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy have markedly reduced the occurrence of this complication. Bare-metal stent (BMS) thrombosis occurs in <1% of the cases, usually within the first month after implantation. The advent of drug-eluting stents (DES) has raised concerns regarding later occurrence of ST, beyond the traditional 1-month timeframe, especially in complex lesion subsets that were excluded from randomized trials that compared BMS to DES. There is widespread controversy regarding the actual incremental risk associated with DES. Recent studies suggest a 0.5% increased long-term thrombosis risk with DES; however, the clinical significance of these events remains under debate. The degree of protection achieved by dual antiplatelet therapy and optimal duration of treatment are under investigation. Novel stent designs might potentially decrease the incidence of this event. In this review, we will describe the current knowledge of the pathophysiology of late DES thrombosis, although many aspects remain incompletely understood.     

Safety and Efficacy of Ultra Short-duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce stent thrombosis, but DAPT increases bleeding risks. The optimal duration of DAPT that provides the maximum protective ischemic effect along with the minimum bleeding risk is unclear. This is the first meta-analysis comparing outcomes for 1-month versus longer DAPT strategies following PCI.We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (from inception to October 2021) for randomized controlled trials that compared 1-month duration vs > 1-month duration of DAPT following PCI. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The co-primary outcomes for study selection were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and stent thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke and target vessel revascularization. A total of five randomized controlled trials were included [n = 29,355; 1-month DAPT(n = 14,662) vs > 1-month DAPT (n = 14,693)]. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.78-1.03; P = 0.12) and stent thrombosis (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.80-1.43; P = 0.65). Similarly, there were no significant differences in MI, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, and target vessel revascularization. The rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in the group treated with DAPT for 1-month (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.99, P = 0.04).There is no difference in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, stent thrombosis, ischemic stroke, and target vessel revascularization with 1-month of DAPT following PCI with contemporary drug eluting stents compared to longer DAPT duration.     

Drug‐eluting stent fracture: Incidence,contributing factors,and clinical implications

Stent fracture has been observed in noncoronary vessels, especially in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and with bare metal stents in saphenous vein grafts of coronary arteries. Since the introduction of drug‐eluting stents, stent fractures have also been reported in small studies and case reports. We reviewed these publications to assess what is known regarding the incidence, contributing factors, and clinical implications of drug‐eluting stent fracture in coronary arteries. The reported rate of drug‐eluting stent fracture in coronary arteries ranges from 1 to 8%, although much of the available literature is derived from single‐center studies that are heterogeneous in their study methods. A higher risk of stent fracture may be associated with the right coronary artery location, excessive tortuosity or angulation of the vessel, overlapping stents, and longer stents. The closed‐cell design of the Cypher stent has been associated with increased rigidity that may increase the risk of stent fracture, although these studies did not assess the overall outcomes between the Cypher and Taxus stents in a head‐to‐head comparison. Stent fracture has been shown by most studies to be associated with a statistically increased incidence of focal in‐stent restenosis, and some have shown an increased risk of target lesion revascularization. Other complications observed with stent fracture include stent thrombosis, coronary aneurysms, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Bare-Metal Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Primary Angioplasty: Long-Term Outcome

Percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) is the most used myocardial revascularization technique for patients with coronary artery disease. Primary PCI with stent implantation is widely considered the gold standard for the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Coronary stents, compared with balloon angioplasty, have reduced focal lesion restenosis. To reduce in-stent restenosis, drug-eluting stents (DES) were designed to locally release drugs inhibiting neointimal growth. Recent concerns have emerged on the potential higher risk of stent thrombosis with DES that might be even more pronounced among myocardial infarction patients. For these reasons, DES for primary PCI remains an “off-label” use. In the last several years, a number of randomized trials and registries have tested the safety and efficacy of DES in primary PCI. Data from these studies were analyzed in several meta-analyses, reasonably consistently demonstrating that the use of DES significantly decreased the need for revascularization without an increase in the incidence of death, recurrent infarction, or stent thrombosis at long-term follow-up.     

1-Year Outcomes of Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Practice: Predictors of Restenosis and Aneurysmal Degeneration

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the 1-year risk of restenosis and aneurysmal degeneration and explore the associated factors after femoropopliteal implantation of fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (FP-DESs) for symptomatic atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease in real-world practice.BackgroundAlthough clinical trials have demonstrated that FP-DES implantation has favorable 1-year outcomes, its performance in real-world practice has not been well elucidated.MethodsThis multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated 1,204 limbs (chronic limb-threatening ischemia: 34.8%, mean lesion length: 18.6 ± 9.9 cm, chronic total occlusion: 53.2%, bilateral wall calcification: 41.9%) of 1,097 patients with peripheral artery disease (age: 75 ± 9 years, men: 69.4%, diabetes mellitus: 60.8%, chronic kidney disease: 66.2%) undergoing Eluvia (Boston Scientific) drug-eluting stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was 1-year restenosis, whereas the secondary outcome measures were 1-year occlusive restenosis, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and aneurysmal degeneration.ResultsThe 1-year occurrence rates of restenosis (12.9%), occlusive restenosis (9.2%), stent thrombosis (3.3%), target lesion revascularization (6.2%), and aneurysmal degeneration (16.8%) were found. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that dialysis, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, history of revascularization, a smaller reference vessel diameter, chronic total occlusion, and spot stenting were significantly associated with an increased risk of 1-year restenosis, whereas intravascular ultrasound use and subintimal wire passage were significantly associated with an increased risk of 1-year aneurysmal degeneration.ConclusionsThis study documented the 1-year clinical outcomes after femoropopliteal endovascular therapy with FP-DES implantation in real-world practice. The 1-year restenosis rate would be clinically acceptable, whereas the occurrence of occlusive restenosis and aneurysmal degeneration should be noted.     

Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging early after coronary artery stent placement

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to examine the rate of adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) <8 weeks after coronary stent placement. BACKGROUND: The risk of coronary stent thrombosis from dislodgement due to MRI early after stent placement is not well defined. Manufacturers recommend postponing MRI studies until eight weeks after coronary stent placement. METHODS: We analyzed the Mayo Clinic Rochester Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Database and examined records of 111 patients who underwent MRI <8 weeks after coronary stent placement treated with aspirin and a thienopyridine. Occurrence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization within 30 days of MRI were recorded. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 tesla) was performed within a median of 18 days (range, 0 to 54 days) after coronary stent placement. Four noncardiac deaths occurred, and three patients had repeat revascularization procedures. Stent thrombosis did not occur (95% confidence interval, 0% to 3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging <8 weeks after coronary stent placement appears to be safe, and the risk of cardiac death or MI due to stent thrombosis is low. Postponing MRI does not appear to be necessary.     

Impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy on patients after drug-eluting stents implantation

Background Impact of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 12 months on patients implanted with DES remains unsolved.Methods From January 2010 to June 2011,1873 patients who have been taking DAPT and free from death,myocardial infarction,stroke,repeat coronary revascularization,stent thrombosis,and major or minor bleeding according to TIMI criteria for 12 months after implantation of DES were randomly assigned to continuous (prolonged DAPT group) or discontinuous (standard DAPT group) clopidogrel (75 mg/day).The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) which compose of death,nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI),nonfatal stroke,target vessel revascularization (TVR) or stent thrombosis (ST) at 180 days.Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of 180-day MACEs between prolonged DAPT group and standard DAPT group (8.98 % versus 10.13 %,respectively,P=0.400).The frequency of major bleeding was 0.64 % in prolonged DAPT arm and 0.43% in standard DAPT arm (P=0.523),that of minor bleeding was 3.32 % versus 2.87 % (P=0.585),respectively.Conclusions Prolonged DAPT beyond 12 months neither improve prognosis nor increase risk of bleeding in patients implanted with DES.     

Two-year outcome of patients treated with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry)

Multiple studies comparing sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with coronary artery disease have been performed. Despite these comparisons, it remains uncertain whether a differential in long-term efficacy and safety exists. Unselected patients treated exclusively with 1 drug-eluting stent type were enrolled in the Registry Experience at the Washington Hospital Center with Drug-Eluting Stents. There were 2,099 patients (3,766 lesions) treated with SES and 1,079 patients (1,850 lesions) treated with PES. Patients were followed at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years for the clinical endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and definite and definite/probable stent thrombosis. Patients in the SES group had more dyslipidemia, history of congestive heart failure, and ostial lesions; patients treated with PES had more previous coronary artery bypass surgery, unstable angina, and type C lesions. At 2 years, unadjusted major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (22.6% vs 21.1%, p = 0.3) and target vessel revascularization (13.3% vs 11.2%, p = 0.1) were comparable. The incidence of definite stent thrombosis was higher in the SES group (1.8% vs 0.9%, p = 0.05) driven by early events. Similar results were seen after adjustment for baseline differences: MACE (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9 to 1.3, p = 0.5), definite stent thrombosis (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2, p = 0.05), and target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.4). The incidence and rate of late stent thrombosis (>30 days) were similar (0.7% vs 0.5%, p = 0.4 and 0.24%/year, both groups, respectively). In conclusion, no major differential in long-term safety or efficacy was detected between SES and PES; both stent types were efficacious in reducing revascularization but were limited by a small continual increase in late stent thrombosis.     

Coronary stenting: A matter of revascularization

In the last few decades, the recommended treatment for coronary artery disease has been dramatically improved by percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) and the use of balloon catheters, bare metal stents(BMSs), and drug-eluting stents(DESs). Catheter balloons were burdened by acute vessel occlusion or target-lesion restenosis. BMSs greatly reduced those problems holding up the vessel structure, but showed high rates of instent re-stenosis, which is characterized by neo-intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling leading to a renarrowing of the vessel diameter. This challenge was overtaken by first-generation DESs, which reduced restenosis rates to nearly 5%, but demonstrated delayed arterial healing and risk for late in-stent thrombosis, with inflammatory cells playing a pivotal role. Finally, new-generation DESs, characterized by innovations in design, metal composition, surface polymers, and antiproliferative drugs, finally reduced the risk for stent thrombosis and greatly improved revascularization outcomes. New advances include bioresorbable stents potentially changing the future of revascularization techniques as the concept bases upon the degradation of the stent scaffold to inert particles after its function expired, thus theoretically eliminating risks linked with both stent thrombosis and re-stenosis. Talking about DESs also dictates to consider dual antiplatelet therapy(DAPT), which is a fundamental moment in view of the good outcome duration, but also deals with bleeding complications. The better management of patients undergoing PCI should include the use of DESs and a DAPT finely tailored in consideration of the potentially developing bleeding risk in accordance with the indications from last updated guidelines.     

Comparative Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unconscious and Conscious Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BackgroundUp to 70% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have a relevant coronary stenosis which may need revascularization. The short- and long-term ischemic and bleeding risk of unconscious and conscious OHCA patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is largely unknown.ObjectivesThis study sought to compare the occurrence of 1-year outcomes after PCI between OHCA patients, stratified on the basis of state of consciousness, with patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not preceded by OHCA.MethodsThe study assessed the unadjusted and adjusted risk of cardiovascular events in a prospective single-center cohort of 9,303 consecutive PCI patients.ResultsAt 1 year, all-cause mortality was higher in unconscious (49.5%) but not in conscious OHCA (8.9%) patients than in ACS patients (8.0%), and both unconscious and conscious OHCA patients were more likely than ACS patients to experience definite stent thrombosis (4.4% and 3.5% vs 1.3%) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (17.8% and 9.0% vs 5.1%). The higher hazards were largely determined by events occurring in the first 30 days. After multivariable adjustment, only unconscious OHCA patients remained at increased risk of death (adjusted HR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.65-4.05), definite stent thrombosis (adjusted HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.30-4.43), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (adjusted HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.82-3.47) at 1 year.ConclusionsAt 1 year after PCI, unconscious OHCA patients were at higher risk of death, definite stent thrombosis, and bleeding, while conscious OHCA patients had similar hazards compared with an all-comer ACS population without OHCA. Dedicated PCI strategies for OHCA patients taking into account their state of consciousness after resuscitation are warranted.     

Resolute italian study in all comers

Objectives : To assess clinical performance of the second‐generation Endeavor Resolute^® drug‐eluting stents (DES) in an unrestricted high‐risk cohort of patients. Background : New‐generation DESs aim to further increase its clinical safety and efficacy by means of more biocompatible components limiting inflammatory response, assuring strut coverage and preserving endothelial vascular function. Methods : Between January 2008 and April 2009 820 unselected consecutive high‐risk patients (1,352 lesions) treated with the Endeavor Resolute^® stent were enrolled in an independent multicenter registry. Primary end‐points of this registry were immediate procedural outcome, incidence of target lesion failure (TLF, defined as composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) and rate of ARC stent thrombosis at 12‐months follow‐up. Results : High‐risk patient/lesion profile included acute coronary syndrome diagnosis in 57% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 23% and ACC/AHA type B2/C lesion in 74%. Endeavor Resolute^® stent was used in an off‐label indication in 52% of cases with stent/patient ratio of 1.93 and average stented segment of 39.8±26.6mm. Immediate procedural success was accomplished in 96.0% of cases and at median 12‐month follow‐up TLF rate was 7.1% with 4.0% of clinically driven repeat revascularizations and 1.1% of definite/probable stent thrombosis incidence. At multivariable analysis, nor off‐label Endeavor Resolute^® stent use or multiple stent implantations were associated to an increased risk of adverse events. Conclusions : Extensive use of the new Endeavor Resolute^® stent was associated with favorable procedural and 12‐month outcomes despite the treatment of unselected complex clinical and anatomical presentation. Endeavor Resolute^® stent showed excellent safety and efficacy profile also in off‐label indications. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Drug eluting stents for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: risk and benefit

Drug-eluting stents have been a major advance in percutaneous coronary revascularization. Widespread use of these stents has been spurred by substantial reductions in restenosis rates when compared with bare metal stents. The use of drugeluting stents during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has been a common practice and is associated with lower revascularization rates in various studies. Unfortunately, significant concerns regarding the occurrence of late stent thrombosis with this technology persist. A clinical dilemma exists as to whether the benefits of reduced repeat revascularization with DES outweigh the harm caused by a possible increased occurrence of the infrequent but devastating complication of late stent thrombosis. This review with discuss the theoretical risks and benefits of DES for STEMI, the available data regarding their use, and the areas where future studies are needed.