Treatment of depression in women: a summary of the expert consensus guidelines

Women constitute two-thirds of patients suffering from common depressive disorders, making the treatment of depression in women a substantial public health concern. However, high-quality, empirical data on depressive disorders specific to women are limited, and there are no comprehensive evidence-based practice guidelines on the best treatments for these illnesses. To bridge the gap between research evidence and key clinical decisions, the authors developed a survey of expert opinion concerning treatment of four depressive conditions specific to women: premenstrual dysphoric disorder, depression in pregnancy, postpartum depression in a mother choosing to breast-feed, and depression related to perimenopause/menopause. The survey asked about 858 treatment options in 117 clinical situations and included a broad range of pharmacological, psychosocial, and alternative medicine approaches. The survey was sent to 40 national experts on women's mental health issues, 36 (90%) of whom completed it. The options, scored using a modified version of the RAND Corporation's 9-point scale for rating appropriateness of medical decisions, were assigned one of three categorical rankings-first line/preferred choice, second line/alternate choice, third line/usually inappropriate-based on the 95% confidence interval of each item's mean rating. The expert panel reached consensus (defined as a non-random distribution of scores by chi-square "goodness-of-fit" test) on 76% of the options, with greater consensus in situations involving severe symptoms. Guideline tables indicating preferred treatment strategies were then developed for key clinical situations. The authors summarize the expert consensus methodology they used and then, for each of the four key areas, review the treatment literature and summarize the experts' recommendations and how they relate to the research findings. For women with severe symptoms in each area we asked about, the first-line recommendation was antidepressant medication combined with other modalities (generally psychotherapy). These recommendations parallel existing guidelines for severe depression in general populations. For initial treatment of milder symptoms in each situation, the panel was less uniform in recommending antidepressants, and either gave equal endorsement to other treatment modalities (e.g., nutritional or psychobehavioral approaches in PMDD; hormone replacement in perimenopause) or preferred psychotherapy over medication (during conception, pregnancy, or lactation). In all milder cases, however, antidepressants were recommended as at least second-line options. Among antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were recommended as first-line treatment in all situations. The specific SSRIs that were preferred depended on the particular clinical situation. Tricyclic antidepressants were highly rated alternatives to SSRIs in pregnancy and lactation. In evaluating many of the treatment options, the experts had to extrapolate beyond controlled data in comparing treatment options with each other or in combination. Within the limits of expert opinion and with the expectation that future research data will take precedence, these guidelines provide some direction for addressing common clinical dilemmas in women, and can be used to inform clinicians and educate patients regarding the relative merits of a variety of interventions.     

Medication treatment of bipolar disorder 2000: a summary of the expert consensus guidelines

The original Expert Consensus Guidelines on the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder were published in 1996. Since that time, a variety of new treatments for bipolar disorder have been reported; however, evidence for these treatments varies widely, with data especially limited regarding comparisons between treatments and how to sequence them. For this reason, a new survey of expert opinion was undertaken to bridge gaps between the research evidence and key clinical decisions. The results of this new survey, which was completed by 58 experts, are presented in The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Medication Treatment of Bipolar Disorder 2000, which was published in April 2000 as a Postgraduate Medicine Special Report. In this article, the authors describe the methodology used in the survey and summarize the clinical recommendations given in the resulting guidelines. The expert panel reached consensus on many key strategies, including acute and preventive treatment of mania (euphoric, mixed, and dysphoric subtypes), depression, rapid cycling, and approaches to managing treatment resistance and comorbid psychiatric conditions. Use of a mood stabilizer is recommended in all phases of treatment. Divalproex (especially for mixed or dysphoric subtypes) and lithium are the primary mood stabilizers for both acute and preventive treatment of mania. If monotherapy with these agents fails, the next recommended intervention is to combine them. This combination of lithium and divalproex can then serve as the foundation to which other medications are added if needed. Carbamazepine is the leading alternative mood stabilizer for mania. The experts rated the other new anticonvulsants as second-line options (i.e., their use is recommended if lithium, divalproex, and carbamazepine fail or are contraindicated). For milder depression, a mood stabilizer, especially lithium, may be used as monotherapy. Divalproex and lamotrigine are other first-line choices. For more severe depression, the experts recommend combining a standard antidepressant with lithium or divalproex. Bupropion, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and venlafaxine are preferred antidepressants. The antidepressants should usually be tapered 2-6 months after remission. Monotherapy with divalproex is recommended for the initial treatment of either depression or mania in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Antipsychotics are recommended for use in combination with the above regimens for mania or depression with psychosis, and as potential adjuncts in nonpsychotic episodes. Atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine and risperidone, were generally preferred over conventional antipsychotics. The guidelines also include recommendations concerning the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), clozapine, thyroid hormone, stimulants, and various novel agents for patients with treatment-refractory bipolar illness. The experts reached high levels of consensus on key steps in treating bipolar disorder despite obvious gaps in high-quality data. To evaluate many of the treatment options in this survey, the experts had to extrapolate beyond controlled data; however, their recommendations are generally conservative. Experts give their strongest support to initial strategies and medications for which high-quality research data or longstanding patterns of clinical usage exist. Within the limits of expert opinion and with the understanding that new research data may take precedence, these guidelines provide clear pathways for addressing common clinical questions and can be used to inform clinicians and educate patients about the relative merits of a variety of interventions.     

The AGNP-TDM expert group consensus guidelines: therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) is a valid tool to optimise pharmacotherapy. It enables the clinician to adjust the dosage of drugs according to the characteristics of the individual patient. In psychiatry, TDM is an established procedure for lithium, some antidepressants and antipsychotics. In spite of its obvious advantages, however, the use of TDM in everyday clinical practice is far from optimal. The interdisciplinary TDM group of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) has therefore worked out consensus guidelines to assist psychiatrists and laboratories involved in psychotropic drug analysis to optimise the use of TDM of psychotropic drugs. Five research-based levels of recommendation were defined with regard to routine monitoring of plasma concentrations for dose titration of 65 psychoactive drugs: (1) strongly recommended, (2) recommended, (3) useful, (4) probably useful and (5) not recommended. A second approach defined indications to use TDM, e. g. control of compliance, lack of clinical response or adverse effects at recommended doses, drug interactions, pharmacovigilance programs, presence of a genetic particularity concerning the drug metabolism, children, adolescents and elderly patients. Indications for TDM are relevant for all drugs either with or without validated therapeutic ranges. When studies on therapeutic ranges are lacking, target ranges should be plasma concentrations that are normally observed at therapeutic doses of the drug. Therapeutic ranges of plasma concentrations that are considered to be optimal for treatment are proposed for those drugs, for which the evaluation of the literature demonstrated strong evidence. Moreover, situations are defined when pharmacogenetic (phenotyping or genotyping) tests are informative in addition to TDM. Finally, practical instructions are given how to use TDM. They consider preparation of TDM, analytical procedures, reporting and interpretation of results and the use of information for patient treatment. Using the consensus guideline will help to ensure optimal clinical benefit of TDM in psychiatry.     

Pharmacotherapy for autistic children: a summary of research

An overview of research involving pharmacotherapy in infantile autism is presented. Methodological issues relating to experimental design, rating instruments and ecological factors are considered. Classification of infantile autism and diagnostic problems are discussed. Research investigations conducted in order to define diagnostic subgroups in the etiologically heterogeneous population of autistic children are described. An attempt is made to relate biochemical findings to clinical drug response. Recent findings are presented indicating that a potent neuroleptic is able to yield simultaneously significant decrease of behavioural symptoms and improved learning under both clinical and laboratory conditions. The drug can be effective in conservative doses and administered over a period of 14 weeks without untoward effects. New research plans are introduced where attentional learning will be assessed in an operant conditioning paradigm using automated procedures.     

Pharmacotherapy of depression: a historical analysis

Summary. Iproniazid and imipramine, the prototypes of monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) and monoamine (re)uptake inhibitor (MAUI) antidepressants, were introduced in 1957. The relationship between iproniazid's antidepressant effect and its MAO inhibiting property was tenuous. Because of the potential drug-drug interactions and the need for dietary restrictions, the use of MAOIs became restricted to atypical depression. The confounding of reserpine reversal with antidepressant effect led to the theory that MAU inhibition is responsible for imipramine's antidepressant effect. Driven by neuropharmacological theory, non-selective reuptake inhibitors were replaced first by selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, then by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and more recently, by a series of new antidepressants to relieve the stimulation of serotonin-5HT2A receptors and the compensatory decline of dopamine in the brain. Each antidepressant has its own identity, but meta-analyses indicate a widening of the antidepressant response range from 65–70% to 45–79%, and a lowering of the antidepressant threshold from 65% to 45%. Although one can no longer expect that 2 of 3 depressed patients will respond to treatment, the newer antidepressants are better tolerated, because they produce less anticholinergic side effects. Received November 7, 2000; accepted February 7, 2001     

Pharmacotherapy for depression in patients with myocardial ischemia

The comorbidity of depression and heart diseases is an important but still devaluated clinical problem. Mood disorders in those ill with cardiac ischaemic disease significantly worsen the predictive mortality and quality of life. It may be predicted that adequate therapy of depression could have a positive effect on the long term course of IHD. Careful analysis of indications and contradictions as well as the application of new generation drugs allows for safe therapy. Evident benefits of appropriate treatment of depression in this group of patients, deny the old thesis on the damage of antidepressive drugs on the cardio-vascular system.     

Pharmacotherapy outcome in older pathological gamblers: a preliminary investigation

Although pharmacotherapy is often effective for pathological gambling, little is known about how it affects older populations. The present study examines the response to pharmacotherapy in a series of pathological gamblers age 60 years and older. Fourteen older patients who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling were treated in an outpatient clinic. Subjects were assessed retrospectively with the Clinical Global Impressions scale (both severity and improvement measures) using information collected on gambling symptoms during clinic visits. Eight (57.1%) older patients achieved sustained response to pharmacotherapy. The present findings indicate that many older pathological gamblers respond to "off-label" use of pharmacotherapy. The present findings are preliminary. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.     

Pharmacotherapy of the borderline patient: a critical review and clinical guidelines

The literature on the pharmacotherapy of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is critically reviewed, and suggestions for the appropriate clinical use of psychotropic agents and directions for future research are made.     

International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: An expert consensus report

BackgroundCervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are electromyogram responses evoked by high-level acoustic stimuli recorded from the tonically contracting sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, and have been accepted as a measure of saccular and inferior vestibular nerve function. As more laboratories are publishing cVEMP data, there is a wider range of recording methods and interpretation, which may be confusing and limit comparisons across laboratories.ObjectiveTo recommend minimum requirements and guidelines for the recording and interpretation of cVEMPs in the clinic and for diagnostic purposes.Material and methodsWe have avoided proposing a single methodology, as clinical use of cVEMPs is evolving and questions still exist about its underlying physiology and its measurement. The development of guidelines by a panel of international experts may provide direction for accurate recording and interpretation.ResultscVEMPs can be evoked using air-conducted (AC) sound or bone conducted (BC) vibration. The technical demands of galvanic stimulation have limited its application. For AC stimulation, the most effective frequencies are between 400 and 800 Hz below safe peak intensity levels (e.g. 140 dB peak SPL). The highpass filter should be between 5 and 30 Hz, the lowpass filter between 1000 and 3000 Hz, and the amplifier gain between 2500 and 5000. The number of sweeps averaged should be between 100 and 250 per run. Raw amplitude correction by the level of background SCM activity narrows the range of normal values. There are few publications in children with consistent results.ConclusionThe present recommendations outline basic terminology and standard methods. Because research is ongoing, new methodologies may be included in future guidelines.     

Rethinking adult attachment: a study of expert consensus

Self-report questionnaires designed to assess attachment in adulthood potentially confound global valence of relationships (e.g., liking and disliking) with attachment. The authors surveyed an international panel of experts to develop items for a new measure of attachment that systematically distinguishes between attachment and non-attachment aspects of relationships. The survey yielded a large set of items on which there is consensus in five domains: secure attachment, dismissing attachment, preoccupied attachment, positive non-attachment, and negative non-attachment. This report presents a content analysis of the core themes in each of these five domains and discusses implications of these results for conceptualizing and researching adult attachment.     

Pharmacotherapy of seasonal depression

Seasonal affective disorder (SAD), first described in 1984, is a condition characterized by recurring depressive episodes in fall and winter alternating with nondepressive episodes in spring and summer. Various neurotransmitters have been implicated in the etiology of SAD, with the strongest evidence for an involvement of serotonin. Moreover, researchers have focused on the development of treatment modalities for SAD. Despite the proven efficacy of light therapy in SAD, some patients do not experience sufficient relief of depressive symptoms with light, and a number of them feel unable to comply because of logistical difficulties in administering bright light therapy. Comparatively few studies have examined the role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of SAD. So far, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and possibly compounds with a distinct noradrenergic mechanism of action seem to be the treatment of choice for seasonal depression. There is, however, a clear need for further placebo-controlled studies to evaluate pharmacological treatment options for SAD.     

Pharmacotherapy of bipolar depression: An update

Bipolar affective disorder is a virulent illness with high rates of recurrence, disability, social impairment, and suicide. Although the manic or hypomanic episodes define the disorder, the depressions are more numerous and less responsive to treatment. As the initial depressive episodes are commonly misdiagnosed, initiation of therapy with mood stabilizers is often delayed, increasing the likelihood of treatment-emergent affective switches on antidepressant monotherapy. The empirical basis for selecting treatments for people with bipolar depression is weak, and only the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine has received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Conventional mood stabilizers are preferred for first-line therapies, although atypical antipsychotics are increasingly used, and FDA approval of quetiapine is pending. Antidepressants—particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bupropion— are indicated when mood stabilizers are ineffective and for “breakthrough“ depressions.     

Conversions between monotherapies in epilepsy: expert consensus

To develop expert consensus for conversion between antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapies, an 11-member panel used the Delphi Technique over three rounds to: (1) identify relevant issues, (2) vote on the issues, and (3) develop consensus. The panel agreed on the basic principle to taper the existing AED only after a presumably efficacious dose of the planned AED was reached. Application is modified by adverse effects possibly attributable to the existing drug, in which case earlier or more rapid tapering of the existing drug should be considered. Patients with uncontrolled seizures, as well as seizure-free patients for whom driving privileges are a consideration, may benefit from slower tapering by smaller dosage decrements of the existing AED. For 10 of the 12 AEDs considered, the panel made titration recommendations concerning initial and target doses for the planned AED, supplementing limited data in the prescribing information. This expert guidance will aid in the period of transitional polytherapy with AEDs from monotherapy to monotherapy.     

Pharmacotherapy of depression in pregnancy.

About 20% of pregnant women experience clinical depression. Inadequate treatment of depression has been associated with adverse outcomes in the mother as well as the newborn. Clinicians are often uncertain about pharmacological interventions to treat depressed pregnant women due to concerns regarding fetal exposure to medications. Moreover newer antidepressants with different pharmacological profiles and little data on fetal risk continue to be introduced at a brisk pace. Accumulating data from pharmaceutical registries, cohort studies, toxicology centers, some prospective studies, and case series have permitted certain guidelines for antidepressant use during pregnancy. We review the safety profiles of commonly used antidepressants, discuss clinical decision making based on risk-benefit considerations and make recommendations for pharmacological treatment of depressed women during pregnancy.     

Implementing evidence-based guidelines for managing depression in elderly patients: a Norwegian perspective

Depression in the elderly is common and exhibits a distinctive phenomenology, due to neurobiological, physiological, psychological and social changes related to ageing. Most elderly with depression are managed in primary health care. Although the number of scientific publications related to geriatric psychiatry has increased, there are still important gaps. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines for managing depression in primary care has had limited success, but has led to improvements compared to standard care. It is logical that the determinants (barriers and enablers) of implementing depression guidelines can be identified and can guide the selection of more effective implementation strategies that are tailored to address those determinants. We are testing that logic as part of a multinational implementation research project called 'Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases' (TICD). Our focus in Norway is on the management of depression in the elderly in primary care. We will identify the determinants of implementing evidence-based recommendations using various methods and comparing those methods. We will then use different methods to match the implementation interventions to the identified determinants and compare those methods. Finally, we will evaluate the resulting tailored implementation strategy in a randomized trial.     

精神分裂症患者代谢综合征管理的中国专家共识

精神分裂症患者代谢综合征患病率远高于普通人群,合并代谢综合征不仅与患者的心血管疾病和死亡风险增加密切相关,还可能加重精神疾病症状和增加复发风险,影响患者社会功能,增加额外的个人和社会医疗负担。多种疾病相关因素和治疗药物均与精神分裂症患者代谢综合征风险增加有关。对精神分裂症患者的代谢综合征需要全面评估和正确防治以改善预后。本共识由中华医学会精神医学分会精神分裂症协作组发起,基于临床研究证据和实践经验,并结合相关国内外指南,针对精神分裂症患者代谢综合征提出临床管理流程建议。本共识的管理建议由精神科专家和内分泌科专家共同参与制定,以期为精神科医生规范化管理精神分裂症患者的代谢综合征提供依据。