Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: Which patients are most likely to gain a survival advantage?

Background and Aim: Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are considered to confer a survival advantage, however, the patient group that should be targeted is not clearly defined. This study aimed to determine the impact on survival of locoregional therapies compared with supportive care, within prognostic categories as stratified by the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) scoring system. Methods: A prospective database was used to identify those patients who were treated with either locoregional therapy (n = 128) or supportive care (n = 92). Survival analysis was performed for groups matched by CLIP score at presentation. Comparison of important prognostic factors was undertaken and univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess determinants of survival. Results: Use of locoregional therapies was only associated with a survival benefit in patients with a CLIP score of 1 or 2. In this group, the median survival in patients who received locoregional therapies was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval 22.7–27.4) compared with 8.9 months (95% confidence interval 7.3–10.5) for supportive care (P = 0.001). For patients with CLIP scores of 3 or greater, no survival benefit of locoregional therapies was observed. Multivariate analysis revealed locoregional intervention, CLIP score, tumor symptoms, α‐fetoprotein level, bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase level as independent prognostic indicators. Conclusion: Locoregional therapies should be targeted specifically to patients with non‐advanced hepatocellular carcinoma as assessed by validated scoring systems. Use of these therapies in patients with advanced disease does not appear to be associated with a survival benefit and may expose patients to unnecessary harm.     

Role of additional angiography and chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who achieved complete necrosis following transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been reported to have antitumor effects in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), optimal time schedules and follow-up methods have not yet been determined. We therefore prospectively analyzed the effects of additional angiography and chemoembolization on HCC recurrence and survival in patients who underwent TACE and achieved complete necrosis (CN). METHODS: A total of 68 patients who achieved CN after TACE, as assessed using dynamic computed tomography (CT), were randomized into two groups. Patients in the CT group (n = 34) were followed using dynamic CT every 3 months without any further intervention, whereas patients in the angiography group (n = 34) received additional angiography 1 month after achievement of CN. We compared overall survival and disease-free survival between the two groups and analyzed the benefit of additional angiography. RESULTS: The cumulative recurrence rate did not differ between the angiography and CT groups (55%vs 48% at 12 months and 66%vs 67% at 24 months, P = 0.92). The overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 88% and 84% in the angiography group, and 88% and 70% in the CT group, respectively (P = 0.57). Of the 34 patients in the angiography group, 27 (79%) suffered from adverse reactions of additional angiography and subsequent chemoembolization, seven (20.6%) experienced serum bilirubin increases of >/=1 mg/dL over baseline, and two (5.9%) developed renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Additional angiography and chemoembolization did not reduce tumor recurrence or improve patient survival in HCC patients who achieved CN, as assessed using dynamic CT, following TACE.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma and octreotide: treatment results in prospectively assigned patients with advanced tumor and cirrhosis stage

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major clinical problem. The only efficient treatment options are percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), radiofrequency ablation (RF) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), but these therapies are only applicable to patients with limited tumor spread and sufficient liver function. For patients with advanced tumor and poor liver function a systemic therapy is required. Octreotide, a somatostatin analog with antimitotic activity, is a controversial treatment option. METHODS: In the current study we prospectively assigned a group of 41 HCC patients with advanced HCC and cirrhosis stage to treatment with octreotide. The clinical and laboratory parameters were monitored and survival was analyzed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The medium survival in the group of all patients was 571 days. Using the Cox regression there was a significant difference in survival for alpha-fetoprotein (P = 0.026) and Quick's test (P = 0.009) in consideration of the tumor dimension compared to the other characteristics. The tumor remained stable in 26 patients over a mean follow-up of 21 months and progressed in 14 patients. One patient showed a partial response. There was no incidence of severe side-effects (WHO grade 3-4). During the follow-up time, 14 patients died because of their underlying disease. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with octreotide appears safe and patients show similar survival compared to a group of patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE. Further studies are necessary to investigate somatostatin receptor subtypes or receptor mutations of patients with advanced HCC in relation to their response.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma and chemoembolization

Abstract
Background : Chemoembolization is often used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma; however, there are limited data on its efficacy in an Australian setting.
Aims : To review retrospectively the experience of 21 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who collectively had 36 chemoembolizations performed between October 1995 and February 1999 in a teaching hospital and liver transplant centre in Victoria.
Methods : Selective catheterization of the right or left hepatic arteries was performed. A mixture of cis-platin 50 mg, epirubicin 50 mg, mitomycin C 10 mg, Lipiodol and gelfoam was injected. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at baseline and at 1–3 months after chemoembolization. Outcome measures included response rates, toxicity, progression-free and overall survival.
Results : CT response rates: partial response 19% ( n = 7), median duration 11 months (range 2+ to 37+); minor response 17% ( n = 6), median duration 7 months (1+ to 12+); stable disease 42% ( n = 15), median duration 3 months (1+ to 15 months); and progressive disease 22% ( n = 8). Major toxicities included one case each of acute renal failure, contrast encephalopathy, gastric ulceration and hepatorenal failure. Median progression-free survival was 3 months (range 0–37+). Median overall survival was 15 months (range 6–50+).
Conclusion : Chemoembolization has a role in the palliative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Our response rates and toxicity data are consistent with those in the published literature. However, new treatments are needed and prevention of disease by reduction in the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and C will be required to significantly reduce mortality from this tumour. (Intern Med J 2001; 31: 517–522.     

Computed tomography-guided transarterial chemoembolization as the initial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: experience of 75 cases in a single institute

We present the survival rates of 75 nonruptured hepatocellular carcinoma cases initially treated with computed tomography-guided transarterial chemoembolization in a single institute. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 93.9%, 74.7%, and 47.4% in 50 Child's A cases; 75.0%, 43.6%, and 6.8% in 20 Child's B cases; and 60.0%, 40.0%, 0.0% in 5 Child's C cases, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 38 estimated resectable hepatocellular carcinoma cases (Child's A, tumors limited in a single lobe) were 94.7%, 82.0%, and 44.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 41 cases with estimated indication for percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (tumors less than 3 cm in diameter and three or fewer in number) were 96.8%, 84.6%, and 55.5% in 31 Child's A cases; and 90.0%, 46.7%, and 0% in 10 Child's B cases, respectively. In conclusion, computed tomography-guided transarterial chemoembolization is an excellent primary therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Clinical outcome of 251 patients with extrahepatic metastasis at initial diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Does transarterial chemoembolization improve survival in these patients?

Background and Aims: The therapeutic efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has not been evaluated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastasis. We investigated the efficacy of TACE with/without systemic chemotherapy (s‐chemo) in these patients. Methods: We performed a survival analysis of consecutive HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis, diagnosed at initial presentation according to treatment modality after stratification, using the Child–Pugh classification and intrahepatic HCC T stage, retrospectively. Results: Between 2005 and 2007, 251 patients were newly diagnosed with HCC involving extrahepatic metastasis at our institution. Among those, 226 were classified as Child–Pugh A–B and the other 25, Child‐Pugh C. Within the Child–Pugh A–B group, repeated TACE or transarterial chemoinfusion (TACI) was performed with/without s‐chemo in 171 patients. Eight of 226 received s‐chemo alone, and 47, conservative management (CM) alone. The median survival time of patients treated with TACE/TACI with s‐chemo, TACE/TACI alone, and CM was 10, 5, and 2.9 months in patients classified as Child–Pugh A and T3‐stage HCC (TACE/TACI with s‐chemo vs CM, P = 0.0354; TACE/TACI alone vs CM, P = 0.0553) and 7.1, 2.6, and 1.6 months in Child–Pugh B and T3‐stage patients, respectively (TACE/TACI with s‐chemo vs CM, P = 0.0097; TACE/TACI alone vs CM, P < 0.0001). Individual treatment with TACE/TACI or sorafenib showed independent prognostic significance in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Repeated TACE could show significant survival benefits in metastatic HCC patients with conserved liver function and intrahepatic HCC T3 stage. The survival data of our study could be used as a historical control for TACE monotherapy in future clinical trials evaluating combination treatments containing TACE in these patients.     

Local radiotherapy as a complement to incomplete transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: In order to determine the effect of additional radiotherapy (RT) after an incomplete transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in an unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the treatment results of patients receiving TACE plus RT were analyzed and compared with those treated with TACE alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and five patients with an unresectable HCC were treated with TACE from January 1992 to December 2002. In 73 of these patients, the TACE was incomplete. Among them, TACE was repeatedly performed in 35 patients (TACE group), and the remaining 38 patients were also treated with local RT (TACERT group). The patients were either in stage III or IVa, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2 or less, and Child-Pugh class A or B. The average frequency of TACE prior to RT was 2 and the RT was started within 7-10 days after the TACE. RESULTS: The 2-year survival rate was significantly higher in the TACERT than in the TACE group (36.8 % vs. 14.3%, P=0.001). According to the tumor size, the 2-year survival rates in the TACERT and TACE groups were 63% vs. 42% in 5-7 cm (P=0.22), 50% vs. 0% in 8-10 cm (P=0.03), and 17% vs. 0% in larger than 10 cm (P=0.0002) respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a significantly improved survival rate in the TACERT group of unresectable HCC patients than in the TACE group, particularly in case of tumors > or =8 cm in diameter. Therefore, RT in addition to TACE is strongly recommended for patients with an unresectable HCC.     

Medical treatments: in association or alone, their roles and their future perspectives

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex issue, as it needs to take into account the liver disease, the cancer stage and the performance status of the patient. The treatment decision has to be based on robust scientific evidence and for this it is instrumental to have a proper staging system linked to the treatment indication. The BCLC proposal serves these two purposes and has been validated worldwide and endorsed by several scientific associations. The sole systemic therapy that has shown efficacy in improving the survival of HCC patients is sorafenib, an oral kinase inhibitor that blocks the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway and the receptor for VEGFR 2 and PDGFR-beta. Sorafenib has been recognized as the standard of care for patients who cannot benefit from treatments of higher priority and established efficacy, such as surgical resection, transplantation, ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Sorafenib has changed the management of HCC, opening the path to combination therapies for patients at advanced stages and to evaluation as an adjuvant for those in earlier evolutionary stages.