Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Cancer Group Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hematopoietic toxicities, supportive care requirements, time to complete intensive therapy, and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 287 children with HR-ALL were randomly assigned to intensive chemotherapy regimens (New York I [NY I] or NY II) as part of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-1901 protocol. The induction phases consisted of five drugs (vincristine, prednisone, l-asparaginase, daunorubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Initial consolidation comprised six-agent chemotherapy combined with 18 Gy of total-brain irradiation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) during either induction or initial consolidation. A crossover study analysis was done on the 259 patients who completed both phases of therapy. RESULTS: The mean time to neutrophil recovery (>/= 0.5 x 109/L) was reduced with G-CSF (16.7 v 19.1 days, P =.0003); however, patients who received G-CSF did not have significantly reduced episodes of febrile neutropenia (149 v 164, P =.41), positive blood cultures (57 v 61, P =.66), or serious infections (75 v 79, P =.62). Hospitalization (14.0 v 13.9 days, P =.87) and induction therapy completion times (NY I, 30.3 v 31.3 days, P =.11; NY II, 33.4 v 32.3 days, P =.40) were not significantly altered. There were no differences in 6-year EFS (P =.24) or OS (P =.54) between patients receiving or not receiving G-CSF on CCG-1901, NY I and NY II. CONCLUSION: Children with high-risk ALL do not appear to benefit from prophylactic G-CSF.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in induction treatment of children with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology.

PURPOSE: To determine whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; lenograstim) decreases the incidence of febrile neutropenia after induction courses in treatment of childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive (G-CSF+) or not receive (G-CSF-) prophylactic G-CSF, 5 microg/kg/d, from day 7 until an absolute neutrophil count > or = 500/microL was sustained over 48 hours, after two consecutive induction courses of cyclophosphamide 1.5 or 3 g/m(2), vincristine 2 mg/m(2), prednisone 60 mg/m(2)/d x 5, doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), high-dose methotrexate 3 or 8 g/m(2), and intrathecal injections (COPAD[M]) on protocols LMB89, LMT89, and HM91 of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were assessable, 75 G-CSF+ and 73 G-CSF-. Although duration of neutropenia less than 500/microL was 3 days shorter in G-CSF+ patients (P = 10(-4)), incidence of febrile neutropenia (89% v. 93% in the first course, 88% v. 88% in the second course), durations of hospitalization and antimicrobial therapy, percentages of infections, mucositis, and transfusions were not significantly different. Although the percentage of G-CSF+ patients commencing the following course on day 21 was significantly higher (84% v 68% after the first and 57% v. 38% after the second course; P <.05), the median delay between the two courses was only 1 day less in G-CSF+ patients (median delay after first COPAD(M), 19 v. 20 days, P =.01; after second, 21 v. 22 days, P = not significant). Remission and survival rates were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that G-CSF did not decrease treatment-related morbidity, nor increase the dose-intensity in children undergoing COPAD(M) induction chemotherapy for NHL.     

Hematologic toxicity of high-dose iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for advanced neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-MIBG) has been shown to be active against refractory neuroblastoma. The primary toxicity of (131)I-MIBG is myelosuppression, which might necessitate autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT). The goal of this study was to determine risk factors for myelosuppression and the need for AHSCT after (131)I-MIBG treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma were treated with 18 mCi/kg (131)I-MIBG on a phase I/II protocol. The median whole-body radiation dose was 2.92 Gy. RESULTS: Almost all patients required at least one platelet (96%) or red cell (91%) transfusion and most patients (79%) developed neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(3)/microL). Patients reached platelet nadir earlier than neutrophil nadir (P <.0001). Earlier platelet nadir correlated with bone marrow tumor, more extensive bone involvement, higher whole-body radiation dose, and longer time from diagnosis to (131)I-MIBG therapy (P 相似文献   

Effects of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy for adult acute myeloid leukaemia.

The Australian Leukaemia Study Group (ALSG) investigated whether G-CSF would accelerate haemopoietic recovery after induction treatment for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) intensified with high-dose cytarabine, and therefore improve response rates and survival. Patients were randomised to receive lenograstim (glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF) 5 microg per kg body weight subcutaneously daily from day 8 after starting chemotherapy, or no cytokine, following chemotherapy with cytarabine 3 g/m2 every 12 h on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, together with idarubicin 9 or 12 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, plus etoposide 75 mg/m2 on days 1 to 7 inclusive. Patients had untreated AML, and were aged 16 to 60 years. Overall, 54 evaluable patients were randomised to receive lenograstim and 58 to no cytokine. Patients in the lenograstim arm had a significantly shorter duration of neutropenia <0.5 x 10(9)/l compared to patients in the no cytokine arm (median 18 vs 22 days; P = 0.0005), and also shorter duration of total leucopenia <1.0 x 10(9)/l (17 vs 19 days; P = 0.0002), as well as a reduction in duration of treatment with therapeutic intravenous antibiotics (20 vs 24 days; P= 0.015) and a trend to reduced number of days with fever >38.0 degrees C (9 vs 12 days; P = 0.18). There were no differences between the two groups in platelet recovery, red cell or platelet transfusions, or non-haematological toxicities. For patients achieving CR after their first induction course, a reduction in the time to the start of the next course of therapy was observed in the lenograstim arm, from a median of 40.5 days to a median of 36 days (P = 0.082). The overall complete response rates to chemotherapy were similar, 81% in the lenograstim arm vs 75% for the no cytokine arm (P = 0.5), and there was no significant difference in the survival durations. We conclude that the granulopoietic stimulating effect of G-CSF is observed after induction therapy for AML intensified by high-dose cytarabine, resulting in an improvement in a number of clinically important parameters with no major adverse effects.     

A prospective randomized trial of HLA-matched versus mismatched single-donor platelet transfusions in cancer patients

The use of histocompatability antigen (HLA)-matched platelets has been advocated for the support of thrombocytopenic cancer patients. We randomized 78 newly diagnosed cancer patients prospectively (before thrombocytopenia) to receive either HLA-matched or mismatched single-donor platelet transfusions. Three hundred forty-one platelet transfusions were given for 80 separate episodes of therapy-induced thrombocytopenia in 33 patients. Forty-five patients receiving intensive chemotherapy did not develop significant (less than 20,000 platelets/mm3) thrombocytopenia and did not receive a platelet transfusion. No marked difference was observed between the matched and mismatched groups in regard to number of total platelet transfusions per patient (median, 3 vs. 5, respectively; P = 0.076), number of platelet transfusions per episode (median, 3.0 vs. 3.5, respectively; P = 0.28), or days between transfusions (median, 2 vs. 2, respectively, P greater than 0.4). Bleeding episodes, although rare, tended to be of increased severity in the mismatched group. Febrile patients receiving mismatched platelets tended to have a lower posttransfusion increment increase than their nonfebrile counterparts (P = 0.068), although a similar trend could not be demonstrated between febrile and nonfebrile patients who received matched platelets (P = 0.22). Patients treated as outpatients had significantly higher posttransfusion increments than when transfused as inpatients when they were given mismatched platelets (P less than 0.0005). Development of antiplatelet antibody did not appear to affect response to platelet transfusions. Only one patient developed sustained high-level antibody titers. In patients where thrombocytopenia was significant, the transfusion of HLA-matched platelets did not appear to offer a significant advantage. However, HLA-matched platelet transfusions tended to be associated with higher posttransfusion increments in febrile patients and a trend toward fewer severe bleeding episodes. A multi-institution trial containing a large number of patients is needed to evaluate trends observed in this study.     

Intensive dose ifosfamide and etoposide with G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We studied 36 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to evaluate the stem cell yield following recovery from intensive dose ifosfamide and etoposide given as mobilization chemotherapy. We also assessed the toxicity of the regimen and engraftment kinetics. All patients had intermediate grade lymphoma and had either failed to achieve a complete remission to induction chemotherapy or had relapsed. Patients received ifosfamide 10 g/m2 IV total dose given over 72 hours, etoposide 150 mg/m2 IV every 12 hours for 6 doses and G-CSF 10 microg/kg/d. Thirty-four patients went on to receive high-dose chemotherapy with BEAM or with CVP and BEAM. A median of 2 (1-10) apheresis was required to reach the target CD34+ count of >4 x 10(6)/kg. A median of 13.1 CD34+ cells/kg (4.1-148) was obtained. Toxicity was limited to mucositis in 3 patients, transient confusion and transient rise in liver function tests in 3 and 2 patients respectively. The median time to engraftment was 10 days (8-17) for all the patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. The regimen of intensive dose ifosfamide and etoposide along with G-CSF is well tolerated and in this group of patients has lead to successful stem cell harvests and sustained engraftment.     

Autologous bone marrow transplantation in poor-risk high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first complete remission. Newcastle and Northern Lymphoma Group.

We report the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in 30 patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin''s lymphoma (NHL) in first complete remission (CR1) following remission induction chemotherapy. Two patients relapsed prior to ABMT. All patients were conditioned with high-dose melphalan. In Addition, ten received fractionated total body irradiation, one hemi-body irradiation and four high-dose etoposide. Unmanipulated non-cryopreserved autologous marrow was reinfused within 56 h of harvesting. Engraftment occurred in all patients with a median of 11 days of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9) l-1), a median requirement for platelet transfusion of 3 days and packed red cell transfusion of 2 units, with a median hospital stay of 18 days post transplant. There was no procedure-related mortality and only minor morbidity was observed. Two patients relapsed at 1 and 2 months post transplantation, and one patient died of carcinoma of the lung 33 months after transplantation. The remaining 25 patients remain alive, well and in CR1 with a median follow-up of 44 months. The event-free survival at 3 years for all patients considered for ABMT was 83%. We conclude that ABMT for high-grade NHL in CR1 with non-cryopreserved marrow results in rapid haematological recovery without growth factor support. It is safe and is associated with high survival when used as consolidation of CR in high-risk patients.     

G-CSF联合GM-CSF及高剂量G-CSF治疗急性髓系白血病化疗后中性粒细胞缺乏的疗效观察

目的:探讨高剂量G-CSF方案和G-CSF联合GM-CSF方案治疗及预防急性髓细胞白血病化疗后粒细胞减少的临床疗效与安全性。方法:回顾性分析53例接受化疗的急性髓系白血病患者,对比常规剂量G-CSF、高剂量G-CSF以及G-CSF联合GM-CSF在化疗后的应用,观察中性粒细胞绝对值、中性粒细胞减少持续时间、中性粒细胞减少伴发热发生概率及各组治疗不良反应的区别。结果:高剂量G-CSF组与G-CSF联合GM-CSF组较标量G-CSF组中位ANC减少的持续时间明显缩短,中性粒细胞减少合并感染的发生率明显减少,高剂量G-CSF组与G-CSF联合GM-CSF组之间无统计学差异,三组之间安全性相仿。结论:G-CSF联合GM-CSF方案以及高剂量G-CSF方案治疗及预防急性髓细胞白血病化疗后粒细胞减少安全有效。     

Quantitative tumor cell content of bone marrow and blood as a predictor of outcome in stage IV neuroblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group Study.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the prognostic value of quantifying tumor cells in bone marrow and blood by immunocytology in children with high-risk, metastatic neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IV neuroblastoma (N = 466) registered on Children's Cancer Group study 3891 received five cycles of induction chemotherapy and were randomized either to myeloablative chemoradiotherapy with autologous purged bone marrow rescue or to nonmyeloablative chemotherapy. Subsequently, they were randomized to 13-cis-retinoic acid or no further treatment. Immunocytologic analyses of bone marrow and blood were performed at diagnosis, week 4, week 12, bone marrow collection, and end induction and were correlated with tumor biology, clinical variables, treatment regimen, and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: Immunocytology identified neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow of 81% at diagnosis, 55% at 4 weeks, 27% at 12 weeks, 19% at bone marrow collection, and 14% at end induction. Tumor cells were detected in blood of 58% at diagnosis and 5% at collection. There was an adverse effect on EFS of increasing tumor cell concentration in bone marrow at diagnosis (P =.04), at 12 weeks (P =.006), at bone marrow collection (P <.001), and at end induction (P =.07). Positive blood immunocytology at diagnosis was associated with decreased EFS (P: =.003). The prognostic impact of immunocytology was independent of morphologically detected bone marrow disease, MYCN status, and serum ferritin level in bivariate Cox analyses. CONCLUSION: Immunocytologic quantification of neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow and blood at diagnosis and in bone marrow during induction chemotherapy provides prognostic information that can identify patients with very high-risk disease who should be considered for experimental therapy that might improve outcome.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) have been shown to help prevent febrile neutropenia in certain subgroups of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their role in treating febrile neutropenia is controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate-in a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial-the efficacy of adding G-CSF to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment of patients with solid tumors and high-risk febrile neutropenia. METHODS: A total of 210 patients with solid tumors treated with conventional-dose chemotherapy who presented with fever and grade IV neutropenia were considered to be eligible for the trial. They met at least one of the following high-risk criteria: profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <100/mm(3)), short latency from previous chemotherapy cycle (<10 days), sepsis or clinically documented infection at presentation, severe comorbidity, performance status of 3-4 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale), or prior inpatient status. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive the antibiotics ceftazidime and amikacin, with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg per day). The primary study end point was the duration of hospitalization. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to receive G-CSF had a significantly shorter duration of grade IV neutropenia (median, 2 days versus 3 days; P = 0.0004), antibiotic therapy (median, 5 days versus 6 days; P = 0.013), and hospital stay (median, 5 days versus 7 days; P = 0.015) than patients in the control arm. The incidence of serious medical complications not present at the initial clinical evaluation was 10% in the G-CSF group and 17% in the control group (P = 0.12), including five deaths in each study arm. The median cost of hospital stay and the median overall cost per patient admission were reduced by 17% (P = 0.01) and by 11% (P = 0.07), respectively, in the G-CSF arm compared with the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Adding G-CSF to antibiotic therapy shortens the duration of neutropenia, reduces the duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and decreases hospital costs in patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.     

Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim compared to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) supporting a dose-intensive, rapidly cycling anti-metabolite containing chemotherapy regimen (Hyper-CVAD) for lymphoid malignancy

Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) has proven efficacy as supportive therapy in a variety of 21-day chemotherapy regimens, but has not been studied in dose intensive, rapidly cycling regimens utilising cell-cycle active drugs (e.g. anti-metabolites) such as hyper-CVAD. This study examined whether pegfilgrastim was safe and lead to similar kinetics of neutrophil recovery as daily granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Using retrospective analysis, patients receiving pegfilgrastim (6 mg) were matched with controls (G-CSF 5 microg kg-1 per day) for a cycle of chemotherapy, prior chemotherapy, dose of cytarabine received, age (<60 or >60 years), diagnosis and bone marrow involvement. The primary endpoint was duration of grade IV neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, ANC < 500 microl-1). Secondary endpoints included time to neutrophil recovery, incidence of febrile neutropenia, positive blood cultures and delay in subsequent chemotherapy. This study identified 124 pegfilgrastim supported cycles in 43 patients and successfully matched them to 124 G-CSF supported cycles from 38 patients treated between January 1999 and July 2005. There were no significant differences between pegfilgrastim and G-CSF groups in baseline or treatment-related variables. The median duration of grade IV neutropenia was 4 days in both groups (P = 0.55). Time to neutrophil recovery, incidence of febrile neutropenia, positive blood cultures and delay in subsequent chemotherapy were similar in both groups. Once per cycle dosing of pegfilgrastim appears safe and as effective as daily G-CSF for supporting the hyper-CVAD chemotherapy regimen.     

Treatment-induced anaemia and its potential clinical impact in patients receiving sequential high dose chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer

First-line sequential high dose chemotherapy is under investigation in patients with "poor prognosis" metastatic germ cell tumours in order to improve survival. Despite the use of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and granulocyte colony stimulating factor chemotherapy dose intensification is associated with severe haematotoxicity including anaemia, which may significantly affect quality of life and tolerability of chemotherapy. This study investigates the frequency and degree of anaemia in patients receiving first-line sequential high dose chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer and the impact of anaemia on treatment outcome. A total of 101 newly diagnosed patients with "poor prognosis" metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumours were treated with one cycle of standard VIP followed by three cycles of HD-VIP-chemotherapy (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin) within a large phase I/II study. Differential blood cell counts were taken prior, during and after every cycle of chemotherapy. Additionally, the numbers of red blood cell and platelet transfusions were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to correlate pre-treatment and post-treatment haemoglobin values to response and overall survival. Forty-eight per cent of the patients were classified anaemic (haemoglobin <12 g dl(-1)) prior to the start of chemotherapy. The application of sequential HD-VIP resulted in median haemoglobin nadirs between 7.8 g dl(-1) (range 5.5-11.1 g dl(-1)) in the first cycle and 7.6 g dl(-1) (range 6.0-11.4 g dl(-1)) in the third cycle despite the frequent use of red blood cell transfusions. Almost all patients (99%) had haemoglobin levels <10 g dl(-1) at some timepoint during first-line sequential high dose chemotherapy. Overall, 97 patients received red blood cell transfusions with a median of 10 units (range 2-25) per patient during the four consecutive cycles of therapy. The time to first transfusion was shortest in patients with the lowest initial haemoglobin values. While there was no prediction of response or outcome by baseline haemoglobin-levels, a significant survival difference in favour of patients with a haemoglobin value >10.5 g dl(-1) after completion of four cycles of therapy (at leukocyte recovery after the last cycle) compared to those with haemoglobin values <10.5 g dl(-1) was found with 3-year overall survival rates of 87% vs 68%, respectively (P<0.05). Severe anaemia is a very frequent side effect of sequential dose intensive therapy in patients with germ cell cancer, with almost all patients becoming transfusion dependent. Despite the frequent use of red blood cell transfusions, median haemoglobin nadirs remained about 7.5-8 g dl(-1) during therapy. A correlation of haemoglobin-values after completion of therapy to overall treatment outcome was found.     

Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to receive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81). RESULTS: Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who received filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P =. 0001), with fewer patients requiring RBC transfusions (P =.008), fewer patients with fever (18% v 52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P =.013), and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P =.001). Patients who received filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis; P =.0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P =.001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fewer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P =.002) and fewer days of growth-factor treatment (median, 12 v 14; P =.0001). There were no major differences in outcomes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34(+) cells and had faster platelet recovery (P =.015), with fewer patients (P =.014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P =.001) than patients receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC.     

Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Reduces Pancytopenia After Rescue Therapy in a Patient with Hodgkin's Lymphoma

After several relapses, a stage IV lymphocyte depletion Hodgkin Lymphoma patient, with a bone marrow progenitor compartment depleted by several courses of chemotherapy, received further combination chemotherapy which caused severe and long-lasting pancytopenia. Because of an objective degree of tumor regression, a second identical course was administered, followed by Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) in an attempt to accelerate bone marrow recovery. This led to a significantly shorter period of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with no additional red blood cell and platelet transfusion requirements. Furthermore, the neutropenic phase was not accompanied by septic complications. It is suggested that patients with solid tumors, even with a severely compromised bone marrow after several chemotherapy courses, may benefit from GM-CSF administration after rescue chemotherapy.     

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy in children with neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: The authors assessed key effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) used prophylactically with multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy. To the authors' knowledge, no large study has focused on G-CSF in this setting, yet this kind of treatment has recently become standard for poor risk pediatric solid tumors such as neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Children with neuroblastoma received cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg (i.e., 4200 mg/m(2)), doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2), and vincristine (CAV) in cycles 1, 2, 4, and 6 and cisplatin 200 mg/m(2) and etoposide 600 mg/m(2) (P/VP) in cycles 3, 5, and 7. To maximize dose intensity, chemotherapy was begun as soon as the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was > or = 500/microL and platelet count was > or = 100,000/microL. No cytokines were used during 1990-1994 (control group; n = 28), but G-CSF was used from 1995 to 1998 (G-CSF group; n = 30) at 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously from 1 day after chemotherapy until the ANC was > or = 500/microL on 2 successive days or was > or = 1000/microL. RESULTS: Each cycle of CAV decreased ANCs to < 200/microL in all 58 patients; recovery to 200/microL and to 500/microL was significantly sooner with G-CSF. In contrast, P/VP did not invariably cause severe neutropenia: similar numbers of patients in each group maintained ANCs > or = 200/microL and > or = 500/microL; recovery to 500/microL (but not to 200/microL) was significantly faster in the G-CSF group. G-CSF had no impact on rates of febrile episodes. Bacterial/fungal infections were slightly less frequent in the G-CSF group with CAV (P = 0.11) but not with P/VP. Dose intensity through cycle 4 was the same in both groups. Beginning with cycle 3, G-CSF patients had slower recovery to platelet counts > or = 100,000/microL. Response rates were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: With multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy, prophylactic use of G-CSF hastened ANC recovery but did not reduce the incidence of febrile episodes, had little impact on infection rates, did not yield augmented dose intensity, was associated with prolonged thrombocytopenia, and had no effect on response rates of neuroblastoma. The data support more limited use of G-CSF.     

Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: The treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients with good performance status aims to improve survival. Dose-intensification could be a way to achieve improved survival but can be limited by neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary, nonrandomized feasibility studies showed that doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (ACE) could be given every 2 (instead of the usual 3) weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (lenograstim; Chugai-Rh?one-Poulenc, Tokyo, Japan) support. The present multicenter randomized trial was designed to examine whether such dose-intensification improves survival while maintaining acceptable toxicity levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were randomized to receive six cycles of ACE either every 3 weeks (control [C] group) or every 2 weeks with G-CSF (G group). The standard dose-intensity of ACE was increased by 50% in group G. RESULTS: Four hundred and three patients (G group: n = 201; C group: n = 202) were randomized. The received dose-intensity was 34% higher in the G group than in the C group. Complete response rates were 40% for the G group and 28% for the C group (P =.02), and overall rates were 78% for the G group and 79% for the C group. Survival was longer in the G group (hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.99; P =.04), survival rates for the G and C groups being 47% and 39% at 12 months and 13% and 8% at 24 months, respectively. Metastasis-free survival, nonhematologic toxicity, and quality of life were similar in the two groups. In the G group, there was less neutropenia but more thrombocytopenia and more frequent blood and platelet transfusions. CONCLUSION: Increasing the dose-intensity of ACE with G-CSF support improved survival while maintaining acceptable toxicity.     

聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子在复发难治恶性淋巴瘤自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的应用研究

  目的  比较聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子（pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor,PEGrhG-CSF）与粒细胞集落刺激因子（granulocyte colony stimulating factor,G-CSF）在复发难治恶性淋巴瘤自体外周血造血干细胞动员（peripheral blood stem cell mobilization,PBSCM）及自体外周血造血干细胞移植（autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation,APBSCT）后造血重建中疗效及药物经济学差异。  方法  选择2014年7月至2016年10月上海交通大学附属第一人民医院收治的复发难治恶性淋巴瘤患者15例,应用PEG-rhG-CSF动员（试验组）;选择2013年1月至2015年8月上海交通大学附属第一人民医院收治的复发难治恶性淋巴瘤患者15例,应用G-CSF动员（对照组）,进行回顾性分析。  结果  两组患者外周血造血干细胞均动员采集成功,其中试验组和对照组采集物的中位CD34+细胞计数分别为16.2×106/kg和8.9×106/kg（P=0.414）;中位总单核细胞（mononuclear cell,MNC）数量分别为12.4×108/kg和9.9×108/kg（P=0.519）。试验组和对照组的平均动员时间分别为（10.66±1.45）d和（9.33±1.83）d（P=0.234）。动员期间,试验组和对照组的平均粒缺时间分别为（4.20±2.17）d和（3.80±2.04）d（P=0.608）。干细胞回输后,试验组和对照组粒系重建的平均时间分别为（10.14±1.29）d和（10.93±2.69）d（P=0.327）。血小板重建平均时间分别为（10.36±2.27）d和（12.27±3.38）d（P=0.121）。两组在干细胞动员和造血系统重建方面无显著差异。在药物经济学方面,PEG-rhGCSF平均费用明显低于G-CSF,分别为3 960元和（11 479.3±2 401.3）元（P < 0.001）。  结论  PEG-rhG-CSF在复发难治恶性淋巴瘤的自体PBSCM中疗效与传统的G-CSF相当,且可明显降低患者费用,应用前景广泛。      

A phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a widely active cytotoxic agent. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may allow higher doses of docetaxel to be administered with potentially greater anticancer efficacy. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of docetaxel given with G-CSF support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had solid tumours and were aged 18-75 years with a WHO performance status of up to 2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed. Patients may have received one previous regimen of chemotherapy in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received docetaxel over 60-90 min every 3 weeks, commencing at 110 mg/m(2) and escalating at 10 mg/m(2) increments. Patients also received G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with median age 55 years (range 29-75) were included. Fourteen (48%) had previously received chemotherapy. At the 170 mg/m(2) dose level (the MTD), two of three patients had DLTs and 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the recommended dose. The principal DLTs were skin and neurosensory toxicity. Asthenia was frequent, especially at dose levels >/=140 mg/m(2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only 10 patients (35%) and was not dose related, with febrile neutropenia in three patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel may be escalated considerably above standard doses when administered with G-CSF support. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 160 mg/m(2). With escalated-dose docetaxel, DLTs were non-haematological and qualitatively similar to the toxicity profile at standard doses.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after intensive consolidation chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized trial of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucémies Aigues Myeloblastiques.

PURPOSE: Ten years after the first clinical studies, the clinical impact of myeloid growth factors in acute myeloid leukemia is still unclear. One of the objectives of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucémies Aigues Myeloblastiques (GOELAM) 2 trial was to evaluate the benefit of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) given only after the two courses of intensive consolidation chemotherapy (ICC) used to maintain complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-four patients who were in CR after induction treatment were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (100 patients) or no G-CSF (94 patients) after two courses of ICC (ICC 1, high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; ICC 2, amsacrine plus etoposide). G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered from the day after chemotherapy until granulocyte recovery at a daily dose of 5 microg/kg. RESULTS: In the G-CSF group, the median duration of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) was dramatically reduced, both after ICC 1 (12 v 19 days, P <.001) and after ICC 2 (20 v 28 days, P <.001). The median duration of hospitalization was also significantly shorter in the G-CSF group (24 v 27 days after ICC 1, P <.001; 29 v 34 days after ICC 2, P <. 001). The median duration of intravenous antibiotics was significantly reduced after ICC 1 and ICC 2, and the median duration of antifungal therapy was significantly reduced after ICC 1. However, the incidence of microbiologically documented infections, the toxic death rate, the 2-year disease-free survival, and the 2-year overall survival were not affected by G-CSF administration. Moreover, the median interval between ICC1 and ICC2 was reduced by only 2 days, and the number of patients undergoing ICC2 was not increased in the G-CSF arm. CONCLUSION: G-CSF should be administered routinely after ICC to reduce the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization. However, G-CSF did not seem to significantly increase the feasibility of this two-course program or modify overall outcome.     

Risks, costs, and alternatives to platelet transfusions.

The use of platelet transfusions has increased greatly in the past decade and is likely to continue to escalate because of the risks of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving dose-intensive cancer chemotherapy, the increased use of hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, and the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Despite marked advances in procedures for ensuring the safety of platelets, including intensive donor screening, infectious disease marker testing, and increased use of leukodepletion techniques, platelet transfusions carry a significant risk for immunologic disorders and transmission of bacterial, viral, and perhaps other diseases and can entail a very high cost. In addition, thrombocytopenia has the potential to interfere with delivery of chemotherapy on schedule and at the planned doses, thus potentially compromising treatment outcome. The limitations of platelet transfusions have prompted the development of agents with the potential to stimulate platelet production and thus reduce or eliminate the need for transfusions. Two such agents, interleukin-11 (IL-11) and thrombopoietin (TPO), have demonstrated promise in clinical trials. In November, 1997, IL-11 received FDA approval for the prevention of severe thrombocytopenia in high risk patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Thrombopoietic growth factors have the potential to greatly simplify and increase the safety of transfusion medicine.