Effects of cimetidine or ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen

The effect of oral cimetidine or ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent flurbiprofen was studied. Nine healthy volunteers participated in the study. The subjects were divided into three groups, and each group alternated therapy with each of the following treatments: flurbiprofen 200 mg (two 100-mg tablets), flurbiprofen 200 mg plus ranitidine 150 mg two times daily for seven days before and for two days after receiving flurbiprofen, and flurbiprofen 200 mg plus cimetidine 300 mg four times a day for seven days before and for two days after receiving flurbiprofen. Blood samples were collected at time zero and at various intervals during a 48-hour period. Serum flurbiprofen concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. No significant differences in elimination rate constant, peak concentration, time to peak concentration, volume of distribution, or elimination half-life were noted among treatments. The difference in area under the curve (AUC) in subjects treated with flurbiprofen alone and in those treated with flurbiprofen plus cimetidine was significant. Two subjects experienced gastric upset; one case was apparently caused by cimetidine, and the other was likely caused by flurbiprofen. Although a significant increase in AUC was observed in subjects receiving flurbiprofen plus cimetidine, the interaction is probably not clinically important.     

The effect of ranitidine and cimetidine on single-dose diltiazem pharmacokinetics

The effects of two histamine 2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of diltiazem were studied in 6 healthy subjects. A single 60-mg oral dose of diltiazem was administered alone, after ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for 7 days, and after cimetidine 300 mg 4 times a day for 7 days. Plasma samples were obtained over a 10-hour period and analyzed for the parent drug and one of its metabolites, deacetyldiltiazem (DAD). Concurrent cimetidine produced a significant (p less than 0.05) increase in diltiazem levels at most time points, in peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve. These variables were also increased during concurrent ranitidine administration but did not reach statistical significance. The DAD plasma concentration was below measurable levels during the control phase but increased during concurrent cimetidine and ranitidine administration. Caution should be exercised when diltiazem is administered concurrently with cimetidine and possibly, ranitidine.     

Interaction of oxaprozin with acetaminophen,cimetidine, and ranitidine

Summary Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in a single-dose four-way crossover study to evaluate potential drug interactions with oxaprozin, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent of the propionic class. The four modes of administration were:a. oxaprozin, 1200 mg alone;b. oxaprozin during concurrent acetaminophen, 500 mg 4 times daily;c. oxaprozin with cimetidine, 300 mg 4 times daily;d. oxaprozin with ranitidine, 150 mg every 12 hours. Acetaminophen, cimetidine, or ranitidine were begun 24 hours prior to oxaprozin dosage and continued for the 10-day duration of each trial. No significant differences existed among the four treatment conditions in peak plasma oxaprozin concentration (86 µg/ml), volume of distribution (0.23 l/kg), time of peak concentration (3.7 h after dosage), or elimination half-life (54 h). Oxaprozin oral clearance was significantly lower (by 20%) during both the cimetidine and ranitidine trials versus control (0.047 vs 0.047 vs 0.059 ml/min/kg), but clearance during acetaminophen was not significantly different from control. Thus acetaminophen, cimetidine or ranitidine has only a small influence on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of oxaprozin. The reduction in oxaprozin clearance due to cimetidine or ranitidine is statistically significant but small in magnitude.Supported in part by Grants MH-34223 and AG-00106 and Biomedical Research Support Grant RR-05598 from the USPHS, and by a Grant-in-Aid from Wyeth Laboratories, Radnor, PA, USA     

The effects of flurbiprofen, aspirin, cimetidine, and antacids on the gastric and duodenal mucosa of normal volunteers. An endoscopic and photographic study

This 7-day, single blind, randomized endoscopic tolerance study compared daily doses of 100, 150 and 200 mg flurbiprofen with 2600 mg aspirin. After seven days the flurbiprofen 100 and 150 mg groups had significantly less gastric irritation than the flurbiprofen 200 mg and aspirin groups. Flurbiprofen showed a linear dose-response relationship with respect to gastric injury and serum drug levels. Four subjects each on aspirin and flurbiprofen with the most severe injuries continued on their medications plus cimetidine and antacids for four more weeks. Both drug groups showed clinical improvement in the gastroduodenal area. In conclusion, flurbiprofen and aspirin therapy can be tolerated in the presence of gastroduodenal irritation by concomitantly administering cimetidine and antacids.     

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists have no clinically significant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole

Aims  Voriconazole, a new triazole antifungal agent, is metabolized mainly by cytochrome P450s CYP2C19 and CYP2C9, and also by CYP3A4. The aim of this open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, three-way crossover study was to determine the effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole.
Methods  Twelve healthy male subjects received oral voriconazole 200 mg twice daily plus cimetidine 400 mg twice daily, voriconazole 200 mg twice daily plus ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, and voriconazole 200 mg twice daily plus placebo twice daily. Treatment periods were separated by at least 7 days.
Results  When cimetidine was administered with voriconazole, the maximum plasma voriconazole concentration ( C _max) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve of voriconazole (AUC_τ) was increased by 18.3%[90% confidence interval (CI) 6.0, 32.0] and 22.5% (90% CI 13.3, 32.5), respectively. Concomitant ranitidine had no significant effect on voriconazole C _max or AUC_τ. Time of C _max ( t _max) elimination half-life ( t _1/2) or terminal phase rate constant ( k _el) for voriconazole were similar in all three treatment groups. Most adverse events were mild and transitory; two subjects were withdrawn due to adverse events.
Conclusions  Coadministration of the histamine H₂-receptor antagonists cimetidine or ranitidine does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in a clinically relevant manner.     

Comparison of the effects of cimetidine and ranitidine in histamine provocation tests in atopic asthma

The effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the bronchial reactivity in the group of 10 patients with atopic bronchial asthma are presented. The patients received 800 mg of cimetidine daily for 6 days and, after a three-day interval, 300 mg of ranitidine daily for a further 6 days. Bronchial reactivity to histamine was determined before the administration of each drug and on the third and sixth days of each course of treatment. A comparison of the effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on the bronchial reactivity of the same patients revealed that after 3 days' exposure to each of the two drugs, cimetidine enhanced bronchial reactivity to a statistically (p less than 0.05) greater extent than ranitidine. Bronchial reactivity was found to increase significantly after 6 days of treatment with each of the drugs but no statistically significant differences were noted on comparing the effect of these drugs. The results seem to indicate that H2 receptor antagonists may cause bronchoconstriction in some patients with bronchial asthma. The blocking effect depends on the type of the drug used and is connected with the chemical structure of the compounds.     

The effects of once-daily dosing with ranitidine and cimetidine on theophylline pharmacokinetics

Twelve healthy non-smokers (7M and 5F) completed a balanced three-way crossover investigation designed to characterise the influence of oral cimetidine (800 mg), ranitidine (300 mg) and placebo pretreatment for 7 days on the pharmacokinetics of a 250 mg single oral dose of theophylline. The oral clearance of theophylline after ranitidine pretreatment, 4.55 +/- 1.69 l/h (mean +/- SD) was indistinguishable from that after placebo, 4.78 +/- 1.96 l/h, but cimetidine was associated with a significant 21% reduction in theophylline clearance, 3.58 +/- 1.07 l/h (P = 0.006). There was a correspondingly significant increase in the terminal half-life of theophylline following cimetidine, 6.11 +/- 1.29 h (P = 0.017), compared with 5.05 +/- 1.43 h and 4.88 +/- 1.45 h for placebo and ranitidine, respectively. There was no change in maximum theophylline concentration or time to maximum but following cimetidine the plasma theophylline levels between 4 and 12 hours were 15-50% higher than following placebo (P less than 0.002). These data indicate a significant interaction between 800 mg cimetidine given once daily and theophylline which is likely to be the result of enzyme inhibition. Once-daily dosing with 300 mg ranitidine had no significant effect on theophylline pharmacokinetics.     

The paradoxical effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on glibenclamide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

The potential interactions between H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, and glibenclamide were studied in 15 non-smoking male volunteers. The study consisted of six treatment phases. Treatment A (3 h oral glucose tolerance test) consisted of 75 g dextrose in 300 ml carbonated water. Treatment B consisted of one 5 mg tablet of glibenclamide in addition to a glucose tolerance test. Treatment C, cimetidine 300 mg orally four times daily for 4 days and Treatment D, ranitidine 150 mg orally twice daily for 4 days were administered in a randomized, crossover fashion. On day 3 of Treatments C and D, subjects received an oral glucose tolerance test. On day 4 of Treatments C and D, subjects received 5 mg of glibenclamide in addition to cimetidine (Treatment E) or ranitidine (Treatment F) and an oral glucose tolerance test. Compared with the control treatment, cimetidine increased the glibenclamide AUC (973 vs 710 ng ml-1 h), but during ranitidine dosing glibenclamide AUC (726 ng ml-1 h) was not significantly different from the control. Apparent oral glibenclamide clearance decreased from 8.25 l h-1 under the control treatment to 6.0 l h-1 following cimetidine but was unchanged during ranitidine (7.97 l h-1). Plasma glucose concentrations were unexpectedly higher when glibenclamide was administered with cimetidine or ranitidine (glucose AUC 237 mg dl-1 h, 228 mg dl-1 h) when compared with glibenclamide administered alone (195 mg dl-1 h, P less than 0.0001). Plasma insulin concentrations were significantly elevated when H2-receptor antagonists and glibenclamide were administered concurrently.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interaction between flurbiprofen and H2-antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis

The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, flurbiprofen, is metabolized by mixed function oxidases. As the H₂-antagonist cimetidine can inhibit the metabolism of some drugs which are metabolized by mixed function oxidases, it was decided to test whether this is also the case for flurbiprofen. Thirty patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were taking flurbiprofen (100 mg tid or 50 mg tid) for 2 weeks were randomly selected and given, for another 2 weeks in addition either cimetidine (300 mg tid) or ranitidine (150 mg bid). An 8 h study of flurbiprofen kinetics (blood sampling at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours) was carried out before the co-administration of the H₂-antagonists and again after 2 weeks of combined treatment. Clinical indices, including Ritchie Index, 50-foot walking time, grip strength and global scores were also assessed on the days of the kinetic studies. Cimetidine increased AUC by 19% (p=0.07), steady-state trough concentrations by 43% (p=0.06) and C_max by 26% (p=0.03). Ranitidine increased AUC by 14% (p=0.03) and trough concentrations by 55% (p=0.001). C_max was not significantly changed (2%;p=0.83). Neither cimetidine nor ranitidine altered the efficacy of flurbiprofen in rheumatoid arthritis.     

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen in humans and rats

Flurbiprofen, a 2-arylpropionic acid (2-APA) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), exists as racemate and is used as such. Although the activity of 2-APAs is due mainly to their S-enantiomers, information on the pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen is usually based on the measurement of total concentrations of S- and R-flurbiprofen. In this work, the pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen enantiomers following single doses were studied in humans and rats. Upon iv administration of 10 mg/kg of racemic flurbiprofen to male Sprague-Dawley rats, the plasma concentrations were consistently higher for S-flurbiprofen than for R-flurbiprofen (AUC = 134 +/- 39 versus 41 +/- 9 mg.L-1 h). In bile duct-cannulated rats, the biliary excretion contained only 3.6-5.2% of the dose as conjugated flurbiprofen (S:R = 1.2-2.1). After administration of R-flurbiprofen to the rat, both enantiomers were found in plasma [AUC(R):AUC(S) = 0.10-0.16], indicating a limited extent of enantiomeric bioinversion. This is consistent with the previously reported limited extent of flurbiprofen uptake into fat. In healthy volunteers also, significant stereoselectivity was observed in the plasma concentration of the drug after 100-mg oral racemic doses [AUC-(S):AUC(R) = 45.4 +/- 12.7:40.1 +/- 14.3 mg.L-1.h]. As compared with the R-enantiomer, S-flurbiprofen has a smaller volume of distribution (7.23 +/- 1.9 versus 8.41 +/- 3.0 L) and total clearance (1.23 +/- 0.34 versus 1.47 +/- 0.50 L/h), but an equal half-life (4.21 +/- 1.2 versus 4.18 +/- 1.3 h). In urine, on the other hand, the R-configuration was predominant, as greater amounts of the R-enantiomer were found both as conjugated flurbiprofen and as an unidentified metabolite. Negligible amounts of intact flurbiprofen enantiomers were detected in urine. The observed stereoselectivity in humans cannot be attributed to enantiomeric bioinversion, as S-flurbiprofen was not detected in plasma and urine after oral administration of R-flurbiprofen.     

The effect of ranitidine, cimetidine or famotidine on low-dose post-prandial alcohol absorption

Plasma alcohol concentration following oral ingestion of 0.3 g/kg of alcohol (ethyl alcohol), one hour after an evening meal, was measured in four groups of 12 healthy subjects. Each group had a control study and a repeat study after 7 days dosing with either placebo or an H2-receptor antagonist (300 mg ranitidine nocte, 800 mg cimetidine nocte, or 40 mg famotidine nocte). There was no significant difference between the control and post-dosing studies in the integrated 4-h plasma alcohol concentration, peak plasma alcohol concentration, or time to reach peak alcohol concentration. This study shows that post-prandial alcohol absorption after 0.3 g/kg of alcohol is not affected by ranitidine, cimetidine or famotidine.     

Lack of interaction between cimetidine and buspirone

Simultaneous administration of cimetidine and many benzodiazepine anxiolytics has resulted in decreased body clearance and marked prolongation of the half-life of these agents. The pharmacokinetic interaction of buspirone, a new nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic, and cimetidine was studied in 10 healthy male volunteers. Each received, in order, buspirone 45 mg/day (days 1-7), no drug (days 8-14), cimetidine 1 g/day (days 15-21), buspirone 45 mg/day plus cimetidine 1 g/day (days 22-28), and cimetidine 1 g/day (days 29-31). Buspirone and 1-pyrimidinyl piperazine (1-PP), an active metabolite, pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion of cimetidine, a manual dexterity test, the Stroop color-word interference test, and a visual analog mood scale were evaluated on each treatment. There were no significant (p greater than 0.05) differences among treatments for any measurement except for a slight (31%) but significant (p less than 0.05) increase in the 1-PP Cmax value. These results suggest that within the normal therapeutic dosage ranges for both drugs, it is unlikely that a clinically significant interaction between them will occur.     

Ranitidine, cimetidine, famotidine have no effect on post-prandial absorption of ethanol 0.8 g/kg taken after an evening meal

Forty-seven healthy male subjects were studied twice using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Each subject took an 8-day course of two of the following four regimens; 300 mg ranitidine, 800 mg cimetidine, 40 mg famotidine or placebo (identical either to 300 mg ranitidine or 800 mg cimetidine). The systemic bioavailability of ethanol (integrated 6-h plasma ethanol concentration, peak plasma ethanol concentration, and the time to peak plasma ethanol concentration) was measured after the oral ingestion of 0.8 g of ethanol per kg body weight, given one hour after an evening meal on Day 8 of each regimen. There was no significant difference of integrated 6-h plasma ethanol concentration, peak ethanol concentration, or time to reach peak ethanol concentration after dosing with either ranitidine, cimetidine or famotidine or placebo.     

The effect of ranitidine and cimetidine on imipramine disposition

Summary The pharmacokinetic characteristics of imipramine were studied after a single, oral, 100 mg dose was taken by 12 healthy male subjects following 3 days of pretreatment with placebo, cimetidine (300 mg every 6 h), and ranitidine (150 mg every 12 h) in a randomized, double blind, crossover trial. After each imipramine dose plasma samples were collected for 72 h and assayed for imipramine, desipramine, 2-hydroxyimipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine by HPLC. Cimetidine preadministration statistically prolonged imipramine t_1/2 compared to ranitidine (22.7 vs. 13.0 h) or placebo (10.8 h). Mean imipramine area under the curve (AUC) following cimetidine pretreatment was more than double that following placebo (2.633 vs. 0.966 µg·h·ml^–1) or ranitidine (1.14 µg·h·ml^–1) pretreatment. Imipramine apparent oral clearance was reduced in all 12 subjects after cimetidine. Compared to ranitidine or placebo, cimetidine pretreatment was associated with an increased imipramine/desipramine AUC ratio, suggesting cimetidine-induced impairment of demethylation of imipramine. Ranitidine was not observed to alter imipramine pharmacokinetics.     

Effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on carbamazepine and sodium valproate pharmacokinetics

Summary The pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose (400 mg) of carbamazepine and sodium valproate were compared in peptic ulcer patients before and after four weeks of a therapeutic course of either cimetidine (1 g/day, n=6 subjects) or ranitidine (300 mg/day, n=6 subjects). There was a small (up to 20%) but statistically significant decrease in oral clearance of carbamazepine after cimetidine treatment. A similar fall in sodium valproate clearance in five cimetidine-treated patients was accompanied by a significantly prolonged elimination half-life. No such trends were demonstrated during ranitidine treatment. Since both anticonvulsants are partly metabolized by hepatic mixed function oxidases, an inhibition by cimetidine at this level may be responsible for the observed impairment of clearance. Thus a potentially important clinical interaction may occur in patients taking anticonvulsants and cimetidine concurrently.     

Lack of effect of H2-receptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of alcohol consumed after food at lunchtime.

The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between H2-receptor antagonists and alcohol consumed at lunchtime, was investigated in 24 healthy non-alcoholic male subjects, each receiving ranitidine 150 mg four times daily, cimetidine 400 mg four times daily, famotidine 20 mg four times daily and placebo in an open, four-way cross-over study. The subjects consumed 50 g alcohol after a standard lunch on the eighth day of dosing with study medication. Blood samples taken during the 6 h after alcohol consumption were analysed for alcohol concentrations by gas liquid chromatography using head space analysis. None of the H2-receptor antagonists had any statistically significant effects on any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for alcohol. Mean Cmax (95% CI) results for ranitidine were 547 (516, 580), cimetidine 531 (501, 563), famotidine 563 (530, 598) and placebo 529 (499, 561) mg l-1.     

Effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of quinine.

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered quinine were determined in six normal volunteers before and after a 7-day course of cimetidine (1 g day-1) or ranitidine (300 mg day-1). Peak plasma quinine concentration and the time of peak concentration were not altered after cimetidine or ranitidine pretreatment. After cimetidine pretreatment there was a significant reduction in the apparent oral clearance of quinine, from 0.182 +/- 0.063 (mean +/- s.d.) to 0.133 +/- 0.055 1 h-1 kg-1 (P less than 0.05). This was reflected in a 49% (range 17 to 90%) increase in the mean elimination half-life from 7.6 +/- 1.3 to 11.3 +/- 3.7 h (P less than 0.05). In contrast to cimetidine, ranitidine had no significant effect on the clearance or half-life of quinine. The apparent interaction between quinine and cimetidine may have therapeutic implications. Special care should be taken in patients taking these two common drugs concomitantly. Additionally, to avoid unnecessary risks due to drug interaction, the use of ranitidine may be preferable in the patients in whom it is desirable to administer an H2-receptor antagonist together with quinine.     

A comparison of gastric emptying rate after cimetidine and ranitidine measured by applied potential tomography.

Gastric emptying was measured using applied potential tomography (APT) after crossover administration of 800 mg cimetidine and 300 mg ranitidine orally. Ten volunteers were studied, each on two occasions. Two hours after taking ranitidine or cimetidine, the volunteer was given a liquid and gastric emptying was measured over 60 min. There was a small but statistically significant delay in gastric emptying following ranitidine compared with cimetidine (P less than 0.04). The median (range) time to 50% emptying (t50) was 24 (15-60) min after ranitidine compared with 22 (15-46) min after cimetidine.     

Comparative effects of ranitidine and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in man

Summary Stereochemical aspects of the potential interaction between the oral anticoagulant warfarin and the H₂-antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, were investigated. A single 25 mg oral dose of racemic warfarin was administered on Day 4 of a randomised 9-day multiple dosing regimen of either cimetidine (800 mg o.d.) ranitidine (300 mg o.d.) or placebo. The degree of anticoagulation produced by warfarin was quantificated by the determination of both the prothrombin and Factor VII clotting times. Ranitidine had no effect on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin or the pharmacokinetics of the individual warfarin enantiomers. Cimetidine whilst producing no statistically significant change in the pharmacodynamics of warfarin or in the pharmacokinetics of the pharmacologically more potent (S) enantiomer, did produce a statistically significant decrease in the clearance of the (R) enantiomer, possibly due to metabolic inhibition of this species.     

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction study between nebivolol and the H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine and ranitidine

Aims The study was designed to investigate the effects of the H₂-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nebivolol in healthy volunteers. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers took part in a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study. Each subject received on three separate occasions placebo, cimetidine (400 mg twice daily) or ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) for 24 h before and 48 h after a single oral dose of nebivolol (5 mg). Nebivolol and its individual (+) and (−) enantiomers were determined tby h.p.l.c. Results Ranitidine had no significant effect on nebivolol pharmacokinetics. Cimetidine, however, resulted in a 21–23% increase in C_max of unchanged nebivolol and of each enantiomer plus its hydroxylated metabolites. Cimetidine significantly (P<0.05) increased the AUC [mean±s.d. (95% C.I. of differences in mean)] for unchanged (±)-nebivolol [7.76±3.07 ng ml⁻¹h with placebo; 11.50±5.40 (1.75, 8.76) ng ml⁻¹h with cimetidine], (+)-nebivolol plus its hydroxylated metabolites [73.0±18.0 ng ml⁻¹h with placebo; 91.5±25.7 (1.0, 23.1) ng ml⁻¹h with cimetidine] and (−)-nebivolol plus its hydroxylated metabolites [101±32 ng ml⁻¹h with placebo; 123±38 (3.3, 27.0) ng ml⁻¹h with cimetidine]. Statistical analysis of the resting blood pressure and heart rate and exercise data did not suggest any consistent effects of ranitidine or cimetidine upon the pharmacodynamic effects of nebivolol. Conclusions There was no interaction between ranitidine and nebivolol. Although cimetidine inhibited nebivolol metabolism, it did not have a significant influence on the pharmacodynamics of the drug.