Fexofenadine reduces nasal congestion in perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Nasal congestion is the predominant symptom in perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), and it seems to be mainly related to the late-phase inflammatory events. The present pilot study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect exerted by fexofenadine in patients with PAR due to mite allergy. METHODS: This study was a parallel, double-blind, randomized, three-arm (1:1:1), placebo-controlled study. Thirty-one subjects with PAR were enrolled and received double-blind medication: fexofenadine 120 or 180 mg, or placebo, once a day for 28 days. RESULTS: The total symptom score was reduced by fexofenadine (both dosages) at V2 (P=0.007), whereas placebo did not modify it. Nasal congestion decreased after 1 week of treatment with fexofenadine 120 (P=0.027) and 180 (P=0.01), but not with placebo (P=NS). At V3, fexofenadine (both dosages) significantly reduced nasal congestion (P=0.011 and P=0.007, respectively), by placebo did not show any significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study represents the first evidence of the efficacy of fexofenadine in PAR, and also the control of the nasal congestion. We suggest performing larger trials to confirm these preliminary findings.     

Loratadine and terfenadine in perennial allergic rhinitis

The efficacy of loratadine and terfenadine in perennial allergic rhinitis was evaluated in a double-blind, selected cross-over study consisting of two phases. During the first phase, 76 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, 8–67 years old, were included in the study. Of these, 41 patients received loratadine 10 mg daily, and 35 patients received terfenadine 60 mg twice daily, for 2 weeks. According to symptoms and side-effects, 32 patients were classified as responders to loratadine, and 28 patients as responders to terfenadine. All observed symptoms were significantly reduced in both treatment groups, but with no significant differences between the two groups. Side-effects were few and mild. In patients with normal IgE, loratadine was significantly superior to terfenadine in relieving nasal secretion, whereas terfenadine was significantly superior to loratadine in relieving nasal congestion. In patients with increased IgE, patients treated with loratadine showed significantly greater reduction in sneezing than patients treated with terfenadine. A positive correlation between total IgE and reduction in overall symptoms was found for patients treated with loratadine, whereas a negative correlation was found for patients treated with terfenadine. During the second study phase, the nonresponders received the other drug for 2 weeks. All seven nonresponders to terfenadine responded to loratadine after crossing over, whereas four of nine nonresponders to loratadine responded to terfenadine. Nonresponders to one drug may respond to the other drug. Thus, more than one antihistamine drug should be tried in perennial allergic rhinitis if the first fails.     

The effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray on nasal mucosal inflammation in perennial allergic rhinitis

Mast cell degranulation, and the subsequent recruitment of infiltrating inflammatory cells, such as eosinophils, into the nasal mucosa has long been considered the most important model to explain allergic rhinitis. Several studies show a decrease in the number of eosinophils and possibly also mast cells during local corticosteroid treatment. Over the last decade, a new model to explain allergic inflammation has evolved. In this model, Langerhans'cells and T-cells play an important role. Langerhans'cells possess a high affinity receptor for IgE. In patients with allergic rhinitis, allergen provocation results in stimulation of T-cells by the IgE-positive Langerhans'cells. The T-cells produce a number of cytokines which stimulate IgE production as well as the inflammatory reaction. The number of T-cells is not usually influenced by corticosteroid treatment; however, the function of the T-cells, shown by the spectrum of cytokines produced, is clearly influenced. The cells that are most dramatically affected by local corticosteroid treatment are the Langerhans'cells, which completely disappear during treatment. This decrease suggests that there is a reduction in antigen presentation. The subsequent decrease in T-cell stimulation may result in a reduction of the reactions that are dependent on T-cell-derived mediators.     

Comparison of olfactory function in patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis

Hyposmia is a common symptom in allergic rhinitis. However, little is known about differences in the olfactory function of patients with seasonal or perennial allergy. A prospective controlled study was performed on 28 patients with allergic rhinitis to grass pollen and on 47 patients with allergic rhinitis to mites. Sixty-six healthy volunteers served as a control. Olfactory function was evaluated by a modified Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center testing procedure for threshold, identification, and discrimination. The grass pollen-allergic patients were tested prcseasonally and after 3 weeks of intraseasonal grass pollen exposure: the mite-allergic patients and the volunteers were tested once. In the mite allergies, olfactory threshold, identification, and discrimination tests were significantly worse than in the volunteers (all P<0.0001). In the grass pollen allergies, the results in olfactory identification and discrimination tests were not different from the controls if tested out of the season (both F>0.05). However, in threshold testing (P=0.0139), the results were worse. Intraseasonally, the grass pollen allergies showed a significant decrease in threshold, identification (both P<0.001), and discrimination testing (P=0.0()29). If the intraseasonal pollen allergies were compared to the mite allergies, they showed better results in identification (F=0.(X)87) and threshold (F<0.001) tests, but worse results m discrimination testing (P=0.(XM)2). Therefore, the different kind of allergen exposure seems to result in a different pattern of allergic olfactory dysfunction.     

Effect of topical levocabastine on allergic and non-allergic perennial rhinitis

Forty-four patients, with symptoms of nasal obstruction, sneezing, itching and/or rhinorrhea, were entered into a placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a topical antihistamine drug, levocabastine, applied 4 times a day for 14 days. At the end of the treatment the placebo patients were treated with levocabastine and the levocabastine patients were treated with beclomethasone dipropionate in a single-blind design for another 14 days. This study showed that levocabastine is significantly more active than placebo with reference to nasal discharge and sneezing. Placebo application improved the symptom score. Levocabastine could not be proved to be more effective against nasal obstruction than placebo in the double-blind trial. In the single-blind set-up, levocabastine resulted in an additional improvement in the score for obstruction, after the placebo period. Although the allergic group tended to respond better, no statistically significant difference could be detected between allergic and non-allergic patients. After treatment with levocabastine, beclomethasone dipropionate administration could not improve the results for nasal discharge and sneezing. For nasal congestion, beclomethasone dipropionate proved to be superior to levocabastine.     

A multicentre study of loratadine, clemastine and placebo in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

This multicentre, double-blind, randomized parallel-group study compared 3 weeks' treatment with either loratadine (Clarityn) 10 mg once daily, or clemastine (Tavegyl) 1 mg twice daily, and placebo in outpatients with active perennial allergic rhinitis. 155 patients were evaluated for efficacy and safety. Grading of four nasal and three non-nasal symptoms, rhinoscopy signs, and therapeutic response was performed on treatment days 6, 13, and 20. Patients recorded daily symptoms and possible adverse experiences in a diary, also indicating when symptoms of active rhinitis were relieved. Loratadine and clemastine were statistically significantly superior to placebo throughout the study (P less than 0.05), based on assessment of patients' nasal and eye symptoms, patients' diary scores, rhinoscopy signs of symptoms, and onset of relief. The loratadine group showed a statistically significantly (P less than 0.05) faster onset of relief of symptoms compared with the group treated with clemastine. Concerning nasal stuffiness, loratadine was significantly (P less than 0.05) superior to clemastine after 1 week's treatment. Reports of adverse reactions showed that significantly (P less than 0.05) more patients complained of sedation in the clemastine than in the loratadine group. Regarding other adverse experiences and laboratory tests, the three treatment groups were statistically comparable (P less than 0.05). The study showed that compared with placebo both loratadine and clemastine were effective in relieving nasal and eye symptoms in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated and was significantly less sedative than clemastine; loratadine may therefore possess an advantage in clinical use in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.     

Clinical advantages of dual activity in allergic rhinitis

Symptoms of allergic rhinitis include sneezing; itching of the eyes, nose, and throat; nasal obstruction; and rhinorrhoea; they may be seasonal or perennial, depending on the causative allergen. The major symptom of perennial allergic rhinitis is nasal obstruction. Sneezing and rhinorrhoea are often present, but are less troublesome than in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Symptom relief is a priority in allergic rhinitis because patients have a severely impaired quality of life. The nasal vascular system is complex. Histamine acts on postcapillary venules during both the immediate and late phase of reactivity and causes plasma extravasation. Other inflammatory mediators can also induce this reaction. Thus, histamine antagonists that also have some additional antiallergic properties have advantages in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Mizolastine is a second-generation antihistamine that has been shown, in experimental studies, to possess 5-lipoxygenase inhibitory properties in addition to its H₁-receptor antagonistic activity. In the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, mizolastine 10 mg/day has been shown to be effective in reducing nasal and ocular symptoms. It has been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo with a greater percentage of responders. Another study has shown that symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in mizolastine-treated patients were reduced more significantly than in cetirizine-treated patients on the second and third days of treatment. In perennial allergic rhinitis, mizolastine significantly improved symptoms of nasal obstruction compared with placebo and also significantly reduced nasal membrane colour, nasal secretions, and mucosal swelling as shown by rhinoscopy. These effects were maintained over a 5-month treatment period. Mizolastine has also been shown to be at least as effective as loratadine, and in one trial even superior in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.     

Anamnestic data in allergic rhinitis

In a study of 770 patients with allergic rhinitis, anamnestic data were collected by means of a questionnaire.
484 (63%) of the patients were women and 286 (37%) men. 45.5% of the patients had perennial symptoms, 33.5% had seasonal symptoms only, and 21% had predominantly seasonal but also some perennial symptoms. More than 50% of the patients belonged to the age group 21–40 years. The seasonal group included significantly more young patients than the perennial group. More than 50% of the parents and about 45% of the siblings had some atopic disorder. About 20% of the rhinitis patients had a concomitant allergic disorder.
Sneezing was the commonest complaint in both rhinitis groups, but it was significantly more frequent in patients with seasonal rhinitis. Nasal blockage, again, was significantly commoner in perennial rhinitis. More than half of the patients reported severest symptoms in the morning.
282 patients had some domestic animal or pet, and 34% of these developed symptoms when close to an animal. Hypersensitivity to animals was significantly more frequent in patients who had domestic animals or pets than in those who did not. There was a clear correlation in perennial allergic rhinitis between the duration of rhinitis and deterioration of the sense of smell.     

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of cetirizine given once daily in children with perennial allergic rhinitis

The present study compared the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of cetirizine (2.5. 5, and 10 mg) once a day with placebo over 14 days in 6–12-year-old children with perennial allergic rhinitis. The design was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study. Five symptoms (sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, nasal pruritus, and ocular pruritus) were rated according to severity by investigators at the visits and daily by patients. Eighty-three patients were randomized to placebo, 84 to 2.5 mg cetirizine, 85 to 5 mg cetirizine, and 76 to 10 mg cetirizine. Groups were comparable at inclusion. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of days with no or only mild symptoms: at all doses, cetirizine appeared to be more effective than placebo, but a significant difference was reached only in the 10-mg group (difference in medians of 22%; P = 0.016). The test of linearity was significant ( P = 0.026) for the percentage of asymptomatic days. The investigators' assessments at each visit scored the symptoms in the placebo group higher, i.e., more severe, than in the active groups, the 10-mg dose causing the greatest reduction in symptoms. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild or moderate in severity. It was concluded that cetirizine at a 10-mg, once daily dose could be used to treat effectively 6–12-year-old children with perennial allergic rhinitis.     

Relationship between nasal hyperreactivity, mediators and eosinophils in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and controls

Background In perennial allergic rhinitis, patients are almost daily exposed to aeroallergens. This ongoing allergic reaction results in increased sensitivity to allergens and non-specific stimuli. It is generally known that inflammatory cells and mediators are involved in the pathogenesis of the allergic reaction. Objectives To study the relationship between nasal hyperreactivity and nasal inflammation during natural allergen exposure. Methods In 48 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and in 11 volunteers a nasal brush, a nasal lavage and a histamine challenge were performed. Nasal inflammation was estimated by the number of eosinophils, levels of albumin, tryptase, prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and leukotriene C₄/D₄/E₄ (LTC₄/D₄/E₄). Results In contrast to PGD₂ and tryptase, eosinophils (1.9 vs 0%, P = 0.0023), LTC₄/ D₄/E₄ (17.51 vs 1.43pg/mL, P= 0.0001) and albumin (8.61 vs 2.37mg/mL, P= 0.0008) were significantly increased in rhinitis patients as compared with controls. Patients also showed increased responses to nasal histamine challenge assessed using a composite symptom score (21.5 vs 4 points, P=0.0001). The nasal response to histamine was weakly correlated with the total number of eosinophils in the cytospin (correlation coefficient r=0.38, P= 0.009). Conclusion Nasal hyperreactivity is correlated with the percentage of eosinophils in patients with perennial rhinitis. The patients' mediator profiles suggest that eosinophils are important in the ongoing allergic reaction and nasal hyperreactivity.     

Perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis: correlation with rhinologic risk factors

BACKGROUND: The reported association of allergy and sinusitis varies greatly between study, and the exact role of allergy in predisposing to sinusitis is not clear. We attempted to determine whether patients with perennial allergic rhinitis are at greater risk of developing sinusitis with respect to a control group, and to determine whether there is a correlation between rhinomanometry, endoscopy, and nasal swab, and computed tomography (CT) findings. METHODS: Forty adult patients with perennial allergic rhinitis underwent CT scans of the paranasal sinuses, and the results were then compared to CTs of the paranasal sinuses of 30 control subjects. All allergic patients underwent nasal endoscopy, nasal swab, and active anterior rhinomanometry, and the results were studied in relation to the CT findings. RESULTS: We found sinusitis in 67.5% of the allergic patients and in 33.4% of the controls, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.017). Twenty-three patients had a positive nasal swab; 22 showed increased nasal resistance on rhinomanometry, and 36 had positive endoscopy, but the association of CT findings with endoscopy, rhinomanometry, or nasal swab was not statistically significant (P = 0.583, P = 1.00, P = 0.506, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinitis is often associated with sinusitis, but the underlying mechanism has yet to be determined. Evidently, factors other than classical pathogen growth and mechanical factors, such as the association of the various factors and immunologic mechanisms, may contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis in allergic patients.     

Desloratadine for allergic rhinitis

Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) affect up to 40% of the population (depending on geographical area), and are associated with significant morbidity, socioeconomic costs and reductions in quality of life. Antihistamines are a first-line therapy, with newer nonsedating agents having superseded sedating first-generation drugs. Desloratadine is a nonsedating, nonimpairing antihistamine that is effective in relieving nasal and non-nasal symptoms of SAR and PAR, including nasal congestion. Desloratadine has a 24-h duration of action, enabling once-daily dosing and providing relief of morning symptoms. Clinical trials have demonstrated that it has no performance impairment, cardiovascular effects or clinically relevant interactions with other tested medications. This article reviews the use of desloratadine in the treatment of SAR and PAR.     

Long-term effects of corticosteroid nasal spray on nasal inflammatory cells in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: The effect of long-term topical nasal corticosteroid therapy on nasal inflammatory cells is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) on nasal mucosal inflammatory cells and efficacy in a 1-year study in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In a 1-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of duration we investigated the influence of a topical corticosteroid (FPANS), on Langerhans' cells (CD1a+ cells), T cells, mast cells, eosinophils and macrophages in nasal mucosa in 42 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Efficacy was evaluated by nasal symptom score. RESULTS: The FPANS group experienced significantly less sneezing and nasal itching compared with the placebo group. The total symptom score in the FPANS group declined significantly in comparison with baseline (P = 0.007) and placebo group (P = 0.009). After 1 year of active treatment, a significant decrease was seen in the epithelium in numbers of Langerhans' cells, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ cells, mast cells and eosinophils. In the lamina propria, there was a significant decrease in eosinophils. CONCLUSION: These findings show that FPANS treatment results in a decrease of nasal inflammatory cells. Furthermore, the efficacy of FPANS improves after prolonged treatment.     

The cellular basis for allergic rhinitis

In both seasonal and perennial rhinitis there is epithelial mast cell accumulation and tissue infiltration by eosinophils. Activation of these cells can be observed by electron microscopy and by elevated levels of tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein in nasal lavage fluid. Furthermore, seasonal increases in the antigen presenting cell (Langerhans'cell) are also evident. Investigations into the mechanisms involved in cell accumulation and activation reveals upregulation of leucocyte endothelial adhesion molecules and an increase in interleukin-4 (IL-4) in naturally occurring rhinitis, while mRNA for IL-4, IL-5 and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor activity and lavage tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) levels are increased following local allergen challenge. These cytokines may be derived from a variety of sources, including mast cells, eosinophils and T-lymphocytes, and contribute to the underlying inflammatory process in rhinitis.     

Long-term safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in adults and adolescents with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate is a novel-enhanced affinity glucocorticoid and its long-term safety must be assessed. This study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of 12-month intranasal administration of fluticasone furoate in adult and adolescent patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 806 patients with PAR were randomized to once daily (od) fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 microg (n = 605) or vehicle placebo nasal spray (n = 201) for 12 months, following a 7- to 14-day screening period. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion, nasal and ophthalmic examinations, electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory tests. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone furoate were determined from blood samples. RESULTS: Fluticasone furoate was well tolerated. The incidence of most AEs was similar to that observed with placebo, with the exception of epistaxis, which was more frequently reported on active treatment. There were no clinically meaningful differences between fluticasone furoate and placebo in terms of safety assessments, including mean changes in ophthalmic parameters and 24-h urine cortisol excretion. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone furoate were not quantifiable in the majority of patients following intranasal administration. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term (12-month) administration of fluticasone furoate 110 microg od revealed an AE profile typical of the intranasal corticosteroid class in both adult and adolescent patients with PAR, with no evidence of clinically relevant systemic corticosteroid exposure.     

Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is characterized by an IgE-dependent inflammation. Nasal obstruction is related to allergic inflammation. Some antihistamines have been demonstrated to be capable of improving this nasal symptom. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate nasal symptoms, nasal airflow, inflammatory cells, and cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), before and after treatment with levocetirizine, desloratadine, or placebo. METHODS: Thirty patients with SAR were evaluated, 27 males and three females (mean age 26.9+/-5.4 years). All of them received levocetirizine (5 mg/day), desloratadine (5 mg/day), or placebo for 2 weeks. The study was double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, and randomized. Total symptom score (TSS) (including: rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, and nasal obstruction) was assessed before and after treatment. Rhinomanometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were performed in all subjects before and after treatment. Inflammatory cells were counted by conventional staining; IL-4 and IL-8 were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0.0009) and improved nasal airflow (P=0.038). Desloratadine also relieved TSS (P=0.01), but did not affect nasal airflow. Levocetirizine significantly reduced eosinophils (P=0.029), neutrophils (P=0.005), IL-4 (P=0.041), and IL-8 (P=0.02), whereas desloratadine diminished IL-4 only (P=0.044). Placebo treatment did not significantly affect any evaluated parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the effectiveness of levocetirizine in: (i) relieving nasal symptoms, (ii) improving nasal airflow, (iii) reducing leucocyte infiltration, and (iv) diminishing cytokine levels. These findings are the first evidence of the effectiveness of levocetirizine in SAR.     

A 12‐week, placebo‐controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ebastine, 10 and 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study investigated the ability of ebastine, 10 and 20 mg once daily, to control symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) over a 12-week period, and assessed additional benefits of the 20-mg dose. Following a 2-week baseline period, patients (12-63 years) were randomized to treatment with ebastine 10 mg (n=88) or 20 mg (n=102), or placebo (n=100). Patients scored symptom severity (0-3) twice daily, and mean changes from baseline scores showed ebastine to be significantly effective in week 1. Control of symptoms persisted over the 12 weeks, the average daily total nasal symptom score for nasal stuffiness plus nasal discharge plus sneezing plus itchy nose being reduced by both doses, with statistical significance at 20 mg (P=0.015 vs placebo) despite decreased usage of sodium cromoglycate rescue medications. Patient and clinician final opinions of treatment also significantly favoured ebastine, both 10 and 20 mg, over placebo. No serious adverse events occurred, and study treatments were well tolerated with a low incidence of central nervous system-related adverse events and headache. In conclusion, ebastine 10 or 20 mg once daily was rapidly effective in relieving symptoms of PAR in adult and adolescent patients; additional benefits of the 20-mg dose became apparent in the longer term.