Efficacy and safety of bucillamine,a d-penicillamine analogue,in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Japanese rheumatologists consider bucillamine (Buc) to be a useful disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and often give Buc to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prior to administering methotrexate (MTX). However, no large studies on the efficacy and safety of Buc in RA patients have been published in English to date. We therefore investigated the clinical course of RA patients treated with Buc and compared the results with those for patients treated with MTX to evaluate and confirm the place of Buc in therapeutic strategies for RA in Japan. Our results suggested that Buc should be given to patients with moderately active RA either before or after the administration of MTX because its efficacy can be judged within 3 months and because serious adverse events are rare. Issues like the ability of Buc to prevent joint destruction and its efficacy and safety when combined with agents like etanercept require future study.     

Efficacy profile of bucillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a large observational cohort study, IORRA

Bucillamine (Buc) is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) developed in Japan, which has been used as one of the first-line DMARDs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. However, direct comparison of this drug with standard DMARDs including sulfasalazine (SASP) and methotrexate (MTX) has been scarcely reported. We therefore tried to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Buc by analyzing the database from the long-term observational cohort study IORRA (previously known as J-ARAMIS). The cross-sectional analysis revealed that responses to Buc treatment were better in males, patients with shorter duration of illness, and those who were rheumatoid factor-negative. In the longitudinal analysis, although there was no marked difference among the baseline variables of patients with Buc, SASP, and MTX, the percentage of patients exhibiting moderate or good response to treatment, as rated using the European League Against Rheumatism improvement criteria, was higher in the Buc group (41.0%) than in the MTX (32.6%) and SASP groups (25.6%). These data support Buc as a candidate for being a first-line drug for the treatment of patients with RA.     

Efficacy profile of bucillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a large observational cohort study,IORRA

Abstract

Bucillamine (Buc) is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) developed in Japan, which has been used as one of the first-line DMARDs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. However, direct comparison of this drug with standard DMARDs including sulfasalazine (SASP) and methotrexate (MTX) has been scarcely reported. We therefore tried to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Buc by analyzing the database from the long-term observational cohort study IORRA (previously known as J-ARAMIS). The cross-sectional analysis revealed that responses to Buc treatment were better in males, patients with shorter duration of illness, and those who were rheumatoid factor-negative. In the longitudinal analysis, although there was no marked difference among the baseline variables of patients with Buc, SASP, and MTX, the percentage of patients exhibiting moderate or good response to treatment, as rated using the European League Against Rheumatism improvement criteria, was higher in the Buc group (41.0%) than in the MTX (32.6%) and SASP groups (25.6%). These data support Buc as a candidate for being a first-line drug for the treatment of patients with RA.     

A comparative study of the effects of bucillamine and salazosulfapyridine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Bucillamine (Buc), developed in Japan, is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) which has been used to treat numerous patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan and Korea with favorable results. However, it has not been used globally. In the present study, we compared the timing of onset of efficacy and the usefulness of this drug with that of the globally accepted agent salazosulfapyridine (SASP). There were 26 patients in the Buc group and 23 in the SASP group. We compared changes in the number of swollen joints, number of painful joints, duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, levels of inflammatory marker [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)], rheumatoid factor (RF), physician’s rating by visual analogue scale (VAS), patient’s rating of pain, patient’s overall rating (VAS), and improvement according to European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria (DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR) in these two groups of patients. Both Buc and SASP were shown to be efficacious within 3 months after the start of treatment. Both drugs were found to be suitable as first-line treatment of early RA. Signs of efficacy tended to occur earlier with Buc than with SASP, and Buc also tended to have higher efficacy than SASP.     

A comparative study of the effects of bucillamine and salazosulfapyridine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Bucillamine (Buc), developed in Japan, is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) which has been used to treat numerous patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan and Korea with favorable results. However, it has not been used globally. In the present study, we compared the timing of onset of efficacy and the usefulness of this drug with that of the globally accepted agent salazosulfapyridine (SASP). There were 26 patients in the Buc group and 23 in the SASP group. We compared changes in the number of swollen joints, number of painful joints, duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, levels of inflammatory marker [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)], rheumatoid factor (RF), physician’s rating by visual analogue scale (VAS), patient’s rating of pain, patient’s overall rating (VAS), and improvement according to European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria (DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR) in these two groups of patients. Both Buc and SASP were shown to be efficacious within 3 months after the start of treatment. Both drugs were found to be suitable as first-line treatment of early RA. Signs of efficacy tended to occur earlier with Buc than with SASP, and Buc also tended to have higher efficacy than SASP.     

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia associated with low-dose methotrexate treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: report of two cases and review of the literature

Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy is widely used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of its favorable efficacy and toxicity profile. Although Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) is most often seen in severely immunosuppressed patients, PCP complicating low-dose MTX therapy for RA has been reported to sometimes occur. We herein report two cases of patients who developed PCP during treatment with low-dose MTX, and discuss the importance of prophylaxis for this opportunistic infection.     

Revisión sistemática del uso de metotrexato por vía parenteral en enfermedades reumáticas

ObjectiveTo analyse the efficacy, adherence, patient satisfaction, safety, pharmacodynamics and cost-effectiveness of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatic diseases.MethodsA systematic review of literature was carried out in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central from the beginning until June 2019. Studies including adult patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with parenteral MTX were identified and data on efficacy, adherence, satisfaction, safety, pharmacokinetics, and cost-effectiveness analysed. As for the designs, systematic reviews, clinical trials, or observational studies were permitted, including cross-sectional and small-sample studies if they were pharmacokinetic studies.ResultsOut of 4160 identified articles, 80 articles were finally included. The efficacy profile of parenteral MTX seems useful in general and in those patients with insufficient response to oral MTX. The parenteral route does not seem to increase the rate or severity of adverse events due to the use of MTX. The use of parenteral MTX is an appropriate way to reduce costs in patients with inadequate response to oral MTX. Adherence and satisfaction are favoured by training programmes in the use of the parenteral route. The results in rheumatic diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are very scarce and do not enable obtaining conclusive data.ConclusionsParenteral MTX can be an alternative to the use of oral MTX, due to its profile of efficacy, safety, adherence and pharmacoeconomic results, especially in those patients with RA.     

Efficacy and safety of 10-deazaaminopterin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A one-year continuation,double-blind study

Objective. To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of 10-deazaaminopterin (10-DAM) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. A 1-year continuation of an initial 15-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 10-DAM and methotrexate (MTX). Results. 10-DAM (n = 10) and MTX (n = 8) had comparable safety and efficacy profiles. One 10-DAM—treated and 2 MTX-treated patients experienced transient side effects; 1 MTX-treated patient experienced recurrent nausea and discontinued MTX. Conclusion. 10-DAM appears to be as beneficial and as safe as MTX for the treatment of RA.     

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine,methotrexate and sulfasalazine,or a combination of the three medications: results of a two-year,randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), MTX and sulfasalazine (SSZ), and MTX, HCQ, and SSZ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: RA patients (n = 171) who had not previously been treated with combinations of the study medications were randomized to receive 1 of the 3 treatment combinations in this 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. HCQ was given at a dosage of 200 mg twice a day. The dosage of MTX was accelerated from 7.5 mg/week to 17.5 mg/week in all patients who were not in remission. Similarly, the dosage of SSZ was escalated from 500 mg twice a day to 1 gm twice a day in patients who were not in remission. The primary end point of the study was the percentage of patients who had a 20% response to therapy according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 2 years. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed that patients receiving the triple combination responded best, with 78% achieving an ACR 20% response at 2 years, compared with 60% of those treated with MTX and HCQ (P = 0.05) and 49% of those treated with MTX and SSZ (P = 0.002). Similar trends were seen for the ACR 50% response, with 55%, 40%, and 29% of patients in the 3 treatment groups, respectively, achieving these results at 2 years (P = 0.005 for the triple combination group versus the MTX and SSZ group). All combination treatments were well-tolerated. Fourteen patients (evenly distributed among the 3 groups) withdrew from the protocol because of symptoms that were potentially related to the study medication. CONCLUSION: The triple combination of MTX, SSZ, and HCQ is well-tolerated, and its efficacy is superior to that of the double combination of MTX and SSZ and is marginally superior to that of the double combination of MTX and HCQ.     

Serum levels and pharmacodynamics of methotrexate and its metabolite 7-hydroxy methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with 2-mg capsule of methotrexate three times per week

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-choice drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, the pharmacodynamics of MTX in Japanese patients with RA treated legitimately according to the government recommended dosage, 6?mg per week, are unknown. Methotrexate and its metabolite, 7-hydroxy MTX (7-OH MTX), were measured in sera of 16 outpatients with active RA in the first week of MTX treatment and 4–12 weeks after the introduction at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8?h after administration of the first and the third 2-mg capsule, followed by sampling at 48, 96, and 168?h. The mean maximal serum drug concentration (mean C_max) of MTX attained at 1–2?h after ingestion of the first capsule was 0.215 and 0.252?µM, respectively, in the first and the follow-up week. The mean C_max after ingestion of the third capsule was 0.223?µM and 0.357?µM. The mean C_max of 7-OH MTX was 0.0334 and 0.0289?µM for the first capsule, and 0.0495 and 0.0672?µM for the third capsule. The results indicate that MTX does not accumulate or deposit in the body of Japanese patients with RA when treated with 6?mg per week, and pharmacodynamics of MTX are comparable to those in overseas patients treated with 7.5?mg per week.     

Serum levels and pharmacodynamics of methotrexate and its metabolite 7-hydroxy methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with 2-mg capsule of methotrexate three times per week

Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-choice drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, the pharmacodynamics of MTX in Japanese patients with RA treated legitimately according to the government recommended dosage, 6 mg per week, are unknown. Methotrexate and its metabolite, 7-hydroxy MTX (7-OH MTX), were measured in sera of 16 outpatients with active RA in the first week of MTX treatment and 4–12 weeks after the introduction at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h after administration of the first and the third 2-mg capsule, followed by sampling at 48, 96, and 168 h. The mean maximal serum drug concentration (mean C_max) of MTX attained at 1–2 h after ingestion of the first capsule was 0.215 and 0.252 μM, respectively, in the first and the follow-up week. The mean C_max after ingestion of the third capsule was 0.223 μM and 0.357 μM. The mean C_max of 7-OH MTX was 0.0334 and 0.0289 μM for the first capsule, and 0.0495 and 0.0672 μM for the third capsule. The results indicate that MTX does not accumulate or deposit in the body of Japanese patients with RA when treated with 6 mg per week, and pharmacodynamics of MTX are comparable to those in overseas patients treated with 7.5 mg per week.     

Folate, homocysteine, and cobalamin status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate, and the effect of low dose folic acid supplement

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of methotrexate (MTX) treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on folate metabolism, and to determine the effect of low dose folic acid on toxicity, efficacy, and folate status. METHODS: A 52-week prospective study of 81 patients with RA treated with MTX and self-administered low dose folic acid; 38 patients were included prior to MTX therapy, 33 patients continued established MTX therapy, and 10 patients were excluded. Drug efficacy and side effects were monitored with biochemical and clinical indicators. RESULTS: MTX treatment resulted in decreased concentrations of red blood cell (RBC) folate and a rise in plasma homocysteine. Intracellular concentrations of MTX were inversely correlated to RBC folate levels after treatment for a longer period (mean 41 months). Supplement with low dose folic acid prevented or diminished the influence of MTX on folate status and had a protective effect on MTX induced liver toxicity without changing the efficacy of MTX. CONCLUSION: MTX interferes with folate and homocysteine metabolism, and the intracellular concentration of MTX may play a role. Our results indicate low dose folic acid supplementation has a beneficial effect on MTX toxicity.     

Efficacy and safety of 10-deazaaminopterin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A one-year continuation, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE. To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of 10-deazaaminopterin (10-DAM) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS. A 1-year continuation of an initial 15-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 10-DAM and methotrexate (MTX). RESULTS. 10-DAM (n = 10) and MTX (n = 8) had comparable safety and efficacy profiles. One 10-DAM-treated and 2 MTX-treated patients experienced transient side effects; 1 MTX-treated patient experienced recurrent nausea and discontinued MTX. CONCLUSION. 10-DAM appears to be as beneficial and as safe as MTX for the treatment of RA.     

Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of low-dose methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

This article evaluates the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate (MTX), its efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and serum folic acid (FA) levels. The pharmacokinetics of MTX was studied in 29 patients with RA treated with low-dose MTX. The weekly dose of MTX was given orally at 2–4mg every 12h over a period of 24–36h. Blood samples were taken 4h after the first administration in any given week. A Bayesian method was used to estimate individual MTX pharmacokinetic variables. We then investigated the efficacy of MTX and the serum FA levels in these patients. We examined C-reactive protein levels (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and analyzed the values obtained before and after MTX treatment in order to evaluate the efficacy of the MTX treatment. The degree of improvement in CRP and ESR was significantly correlated with the length of time the MTX concentration–time curve remained above 0.02µM in one week. Furthermore, the degree of improvement in CRP was also significantly correlated with the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) for MTX. These results suggest that serum MTX measurements could be useful in determining individual patient regimens.     

Safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly subjects with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly (age > or = 65 yrs) and younger adult subjects (age < 65 yrs) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Subset analyses were used to describe the safety and efficacy of etanercept in elderly and younger subjects treated for early and disease modifying antirheumatic drug-resistant or late-stage RA (ERA and LRA) in one of 4 randomized controlled clinical studies (N = 1353) or 2 longterm extensions (N = 1049). RESULTS: Rates of serious adverse events tended to be higher in elderly than younger subjects; however, rates of safety events observed in elderly etanercept-treated subjects did not exceed rates in elderly placebo or methotrexate (MTX)-treated subjects. With regard to efficacy measures [American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70], elderly subjects tended to have somewhat less robust responses to treatment than younger subjects. However, for both age groups, treatment with etanercept resulted in improved efficacy and function compared with control treatment, and combination therapy with etanercept plus MTX resulted in greater efficacy than either etanercept or MTX used alone. Efficacy responses of elderly subjects were sustained for up to 6 years. Radiographic progression (measured using modified Sharp Score) after one year of treatment was lower in subjects treated with both etanercept and MTX compared with subjects treated with either agent used alone, and this pattern was similar in both age groups. CONCLUSION: Consistent with responses in younger subjects, elderly subjects with RA treated with etanercept experienced significant improvement in disease activity and function without incurring additional safety concerns.     

利妥昔单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗重度类风湿关节炎的随机双盲安慰剂对照的临床研究

目的 观察利妥昔单抗联用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗重度活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)72周后的疗效和安全性.方法 将患者按2:1:1的比例随机分为500 mg利妥者单抗治疗组、1000 mg利妥昔单抗治疗组及安慰剂组,所有患者同时服用MTX 7.5～20 mg/周,每24周为1个疗程,每疗程于第1日和第15 日输注利妥昔单抗500 mg或1000mg或安慰剂.主要疗效指标为达到ACR20的患者比例,次要疗效指标为达到ACR50、ACR70的比例,及DAS28的改善情况.结果 满足方差齐性,则采用单因素方差分析或t检验方法,如不满足方差齐性,则采用秩转换检验方法.结果 共纳入22例DAS28＞5.1的重度RA患者(女性占93%,平均年龄50岁,MTX平均服用剂量17.6 mg/周),有2例患者因疗效不佳退出,其余患者均完成了 4个疗程的利妥昔单抗治疗,症状明显缓解,在72周结束实验时,500 mg利妥昔单抗组达到ACR20的比例为80%,而1000 mg组达到ACR20的比例为60%,安慰剂+MTX组达到ACR20的比例为57%,同时各治疗组患者红细胞沉降率、DAS28均较基线显著下降.最常见的不良反应为上乎吸道感染,其次是淋巴细胞下降及肝功能异常.结论 利妥昔单抗对RA具有显著的疗效和良好的安全性.     

A multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of anakinra (Kineret), a recombinant interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with background methotrexate

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of 100 mg daily anakinra (Kineret), a recombinant form of the naturally occurring interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, plus methotrexate (MTX) in reducing the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active RA (n = 506) despite current treatment with MTX were enrolled in this multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study. Patients received subcutaneous injections of anakinra 100 mg/day or placebo. They were assessed monthly for 6 months for improvement in signs and symptoms of RA and for adverse events. The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of patients attaining ACR20 response at week 24. RESULTS: Significantly greater proportions of patients treated with anakinra compared with placebo achieved ACR20 (38% v 22%; p<0.001), ACR50 (17% v 8%; p<0.01), and ACR70 (6% v 2%; p<0.05) responses. The response to anakinra was rapid; the proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at the first study assessment (4 weeks) was twice as high with anakinra as with placebo (p<0.005). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant responses were also seen in individual components of the ACR response (for example, Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain, C reactive protein levels, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Anakinra was well tolerated, with a safety profile, similar to that of placebo with one exception: mild to moderate injection site reactions were more common with anakinra than with placebo (65% v 24%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous observations from a dose-ranging study showing that anakinra, in combination with MTX, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with RA who have inadequate responses to MTX alone.     

Are <Emphasis Type="Italic">Thymidylate synthase</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase</Emphasis> genes linked with methotrexate response (efficacy,toxicity) in Indian (Asian) rheumatoid arthritis patients?

Methotrexate (MTX) is among the best-tolerated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); major drawbacks of MTX therapy are the large interpatient variability in clinical response and the unpredictable appearance of a large spectrum of side effects. Several studies have demonstrated gene polymorphism that may regulate intracellular methotrexate metabolic pathway enzymes linked to drug efficacy and safety, but the evidence available is not yet conclusive. We decided to run a pilot study to determine the incidence of Methylene tetrahydrofolate (MTHFR; C677T, A1298C) and Thymidylate synthase (TS; 5′ UTR repeat, 3′ UTR deletion) gene polymorphism in rheumatoid arthritis patients in our community (Indian Asian) and further explore its association with MTX response (efficacy, toxicity). Thirty-four naïve RA patients on supervised MTX therapy and 139 healthy controls were genotyped for A1298C and C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene and 5′ UTR repeat and 3′ UTR deletion polymorphism of the TYMS gene by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Association, if any, between gene polymorphism and MTX response in RA patients was analyzed. The MTHFR A1298C ‘C’ allele incidence among RA patients (46%) was significantly higher (χ ²?=?4.24, P?相似文献   

Factors predicting the response to low-dose methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a better response in male patients

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) throughout the world. In Japan, MTX is recommended by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to be given as the second or third DMARD and at a dosage of no more than 8?mg/week. We analyzed the efficacy of MTX in Japanese patients with RA in order to determine whether it is comparable to that in Western countries, where 15–20?mg/week of MTX is used, as well as to elucidate the factors associated with the favorable response to MTX. Around 8?mg/week of MTX was effective in half of the RA patients in the current study, and male sex was the only factor associated with a good response to MTX from a multivariate regression model analysis. Some of the patients who had a poor response to MTX showed an improvement with the addition of bucillamine or prednisolone. For the remaining patients, an increase in the MTX dosage to more than 8?mg/week or the use of biologics such as the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α monoclonal antibody may be required.     

Additive combination of actarit and methotrexate in the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an additive combination of a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) actarit and low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) unresponsive to MTX. Thirty-four patients with active RA, who had been unsuccessfully treated with MTX for at least 3 months were enrolled on a 24-week course of actarit (300 mg/day) and MTX (2.5–10 mg/week). Disease activity was evaluated by physical global assessments using conventional measures (Japan Rheumatism Association), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria of improvements in RA. Thirty-two patients completed this study. No severe adverse drug reactions were seen. Patients whose RA did not respond to MTX alone responded to the combination therapy, with a significant improvement in the duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, swollen joint counts, patient's articular pain score, modified health assessment questionnaire (M-HAQ) score, score of both patient's and physician's global assessments, and C-reactive proteins (CRP). Sixteen patients (50.0%) and 9 patients (31.0%) showed a significant improvement in overall conventional measures, and ACR response criteria, respectively, and 60.0% of RA patients who received MTX for more than 1 year showed improvement in ACR definition. Patients who responded to the combination treatment within the first 12 weeks showed persistent improvement for the remaining part of the 24 week period. Our results indicate that the additive combination of actarit and MTX is safe, and without serious adverse effects, and has an excellent efficacy in patients with active and refractory RA. Received: July 28, 1999 / Accepted: January 28, 2000