Repeated administration of dopaminergic agents in the nucleus accumbens and morphine-induced place preference

In the present study, the effects of repeated intra nucleus accumbens (intra-NAc) injections of dopamine receptor agents on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats were investigated by using an unbiased 3-days schedule of place conditioning design. The animals receiving once daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine (0.5-7.5mg/kg) or saline (1.0 ml/kg, s.c.) showed a significant place preference in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum response was observed with 5mg/kg of the opioid. Three days intra-NAc injections of apomorphine (0.5 and 1 microg/rat) followed by 5 days free of the drug, increased or decreased, respectively CPP induced by the lower dose of morphine (0.5mg/kg, s.c.). Morphine-induced CPP was also significantly increased in the animals that had previously received the 3-days intra-NAc injections of SKF 38393 (4 and 8 microg/rat) or quinpirole (2 and 4 microg/rat, intra-NAc). The CPP induced by a higher dose of morphine (5mg/kg, s.c.) was significantly decreased in the animals that had previously received the 3-days SCH 23390 (0.005 and 0.01 microg/rat; intra-NAc). On the other hand, the CPP induced by morphine (5mg/kg, s.c.) was significantly increased in the animals that had previously received the 3-days sulpiride administration (5 microg/rat, intra-NAc). The 3-days administration of apomorphine, SKF 38393 or quinpirole, but not SCH 23390 and sulpiride reduced the locomotor activity in the test session. It is concluded that repeated injections of dopamine receptors agents followed by 5 days free of the drugs in the NAc can affect morphine reward.     

Functional interaction between morphine and central amygdala cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the acquisition and expression of conditioned place preference

The present study was done to determine whether cannabinoid CB1 receptors of the central amygdala (CeA) are implicated in morphine-induced place preference. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of morphine (2, 4 and 6 mg/kg) caused a significant dose-dependent conditioned place preference (CPP) in male Wistar rats. Intra-CeA microinjection of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist arachidonylcyclopropylamide (ACPA; 0.5, 2.5 and 5 ng/rat) dose-dependently potentiated the morphine (2mg/kg)-induced CPP. Furthermore, the administration of ACPA (5 ng/rat, intra-CeA) alone induced a significant CPP. It should be considered that the higher dose of ACPA (5 ng/rat, intra-CeA) in combination with morphine decreased locomotor activity on the testing phase. On the other hand, intra-CeA microinjection of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (120 ng/rat) alone induced a significant conditioned place aversion (CPA). Moreover, intra-CeA microinjection of AM251 (90 and 120 ng/rat) inhibited the morphine-induced place preference with a significant interaction. Intra-CeA microinjection of AM251 reversed the effect of ACPA on morphine response. Interestingly, microinjection of ACPA (2.5 and 5 ng/rat) or AM251 (60-120 ng/rat) into the CeA increased or decreased the expression of morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced place preference respectively. These observations provide evidence that cannabinoid CB1 receptors of the CeA are involved in mediating reward and these receptors are also implicated in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced CPP.     

Morphine-induced place preference: involvement of the central amygdala NMDA receptors

In the present study, the effects of bilateral injections of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist and/or antagonist into the central amygdala (CeA) on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were investigated in male Wistar rats. Animals that received 3 daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine (1-9 mg/kg) or saline (1.0 ml/kg) indicated a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine in a dose dependent manner. Intra-CeA administration of the NMDA (0.01, 0.1 or 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (1 mg/kg, s.c.) elicited a significant CPP. Administration of the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.1, 0.3 or 0.5 microg/rat), into the central amygdala dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (6 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced place preference. Furthermore, intra-CeA administration of MK-801 (0.25, 0.5 or 1 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by NMDA (1 microg/rat, intra-CeA) plus morphine (1 mg/kg, s.c.). Neither NMDA nor MK-801 alone produce a significant place preference or place aversion. Moreover, intra-CeA injection of NMDA but not MK-801 before testing significantly increased the expression of morphine (6 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced place preference. NMDA or MK-801 injections into the CeA had no effects on locomotor activity on the testing sessions. These results suggest that the NMDA receptor mechanisms in the central amygdala may be involved in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference.     

Effects of dopamine antagonists with different receptor blockade profiles on morphine-induced place preference in male mice

The effects of dopamine (DA) antagonists with different selectivity for the DA receptors (SCH 23390, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 mg/kg; haloperidol, 0.2, 0.1 mg/kg; raclopride, 1.2, 0.6, 0.3 mg/kg; risperidone, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1 mg/kg; U-99194A maleate, 40, 20 mg/kg; clozapine, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625 mg/kg) on the acquisition of place conditioning and morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were explored in male mice. Morphine (40 mg/kg) produced CPP while SCH 23390, haloperidol and clozapine (highest dose) and risperidone (lowest dose) produced conditioned place aversion (CPA). Raclopride and U-99194A maleate did not produce CPP or CPA. Morphine-induced CPP was reversed by the administration of SCH 23390 and risperidone (all doses), haloperidol (highest dose) and raclopride and clozapine (intermediate and lowest doses). U-99194A maleate did not reverse morphine-induced CPP. These results suggest that the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine are mediated by the different subtypes of DA receptors.     

NMDA glutamate but not dopamine antagonists blocks drug-induced reinstatement of morphine place preference

The effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic antagonists on the drug-induced reinstatement of a previously extinguished morphine conditioned place preference (CPP) in mice were evaluated. Following extinction of a place preference induced by morphine (40 mg/kg), a non-contingent injection of the dopaminergic antagonists SCH 23390 (0.125, 0.5 mg/kg), raclopride (0.3, 1.2 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) and the dopamine (DA) release inhibitor CGS 10746B (1, 10 mg/kg) or glutamatergic NMDA antagonists memantine (10, 20, 40 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg/kg) alone or with 10 mg/kg morphine was given. Neither the dopaminergic nor the glutamatergic antagonists alone reinstated the place preference. Dopamine antagonists failed to block the morphine-induced reinstatement of place preference while memantine and MK-801 blocked it with intermediate and high doses. These results suggest that drug-induced reinstatement of place preference may be largely independent of dopamine and more closely related to glutamatergic neurotransmission.     

Repeated pre-exposure to morphine into the ventral pallidum enhances morphine-induced place preference: involvement of dopaminergic and opioidergic mechanisms

In the present study, the effect of repeated administration of morphine into the ventral pallidum (intra-VP) on the conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by systemic morphine injection was investigated in male Wistar rats. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of morphine (2.5, 5 and 7.5mg/kg), during conditioning, induced conditioned place preference (CPP). The maximum response was obtained with 5mg/kg of morphine. Lower dose of morphine (0.5mg/kg) did not induce CPP, but in the animals which had previously, received 3 days intra-VP repeated injections of morphine (3 or 5microg/rat) followed by 5 days free of the drug, elicited a significant CPP. Moreover, 3 days intraperitoneal (i.p.) pretreatment with different doses of naloxone (0.5, 1 and 2mg/kg), SCH 23390 (0.012, 0.025 and 0.05mg/kg) or sulpiride (6.2, 12.5 and 25mg/kg) in combination with repeated injections of morphine (5microg/rat), blocked the opioid response on the acquisition of morphine (0.5mg/kg) CPP. On the other hand, our results showed that 3 days single repeated administration of different doses of naloxone (0.5, 1 or 2mg/kg, i.p.), SCH 23390 but not sulpiride followed by 5 days free of the drug, significantly decreased the acquisition of morphine (0.5mg/kg) CPP and also induced place aversion. Furthermore, the drugs' injections had no effect on locomotor activity on the testing phase of CPP. It is concluded that repeated intra-VP injections of morphine induces behavioral sensitization, which may be due to the opioidrgic and/or dopaminergic mechanism(s).     

Potentiation of morphine-induced conditioned place preference with concurrent use of amantadine and fluvoxamine by the intraperitoneal and intracerebroventricular injection in rat

In this study, the effect of concurrent use of fluvoxamine and amantadine on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was investigated by the intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection in rat. The CPP paradigms took place on 6 consecutive days by using an unbiased procedure. Our results showed that i.p. injection of morphine sulfate (2.5–10 mg/kg) induced CPP in rat. On day 6, fluvoxamine (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.), and amantadine (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) both increased morphine-induced conditioned place preference. Intracerebroventricular injection of fluvoxamine (10 μg/rat) and amantadine (10 μg/rat) were also increased morphine-induced conditioned preference significantly. Concurrent use of fluvoxamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.; 10 μg/rat i.c.v.) and amantadine (10 mg/kg, i.p.; 10 μg/rat, i.c.v.) potentiated morphine-induced conditioned preference significantly. Release of dopamine from neurons cause reinforcing behavior. Morphine produces reinforcement (reward) effect by activation of μ receptors which facilitated dopaminergic transmission through dopamine release. Fluvoxamine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, increase serotonin concentration in synaptic clefts, which is a potent stimulator of dopamine release. Amantadine also appears to work by increasing dopamine release from neuron. In conclusion, our results show that concurrent use of fluvoxamine and amantadine potentiate morphine-like effect on CPP through increasing dopaminergic transmission and this combination may simulate the rewarding effect of morphine and can be candidate for controlling the drug compulsive seeking in morphine dependent subjects.     

Sulpiride injections into the medial septum reverse the influence of intra-medial septum injection of L-arginine on expression of place conditioning-induced by morphine in rats

Effects of intra-medial septum injections of L-arginine, a precursor of nitric oxide, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, and sulpiride, a selective antagonist of dopamine D2 receptor on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in male Wistar rats were examined. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, morphine (0.5-7.5 mg/kg, s.c.) produced a significant place preference in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum response was observed with 5.0 mg/kg of opioid. Sulpiride (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/rat), but not L-arginine (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/rat) or L-NAME (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/rat), in combination with morphine (5.0 mg/kg), during conditioning, significantly altered morphine-induced CPP. Single doses (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/rat) of either L-arginine or L-NAME, during conditioning, did not induce CPP. Sulpiride at 0.3-3.0 microg/rat, intra-medial septum, during conditioning, produced a significant conditioned place aversion. Intra-medial septum injections of L-arginine but not L-NAME or sulpiride, 1-2 min before testing, increased the expression of morphine-induced CPP. The administration of sulpiride (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/rat), but not L-NAME (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/rat), 1-2 min before the injection of L-arginine (0.3 microg/rat) on day of test, significantly attenuated the response to L-arginine. L-Arginine (0.3-3.0 microg/rat), during conditioning, showed a statistically significant increase in locomotor activity compared with that to control group. Moreover, sulpiride decreased locomotion by itself or in combination with morphine during conditioning and on the test day of morphine CPP. It can be concluded that L-arginine, a precursor of nitric oxide, in the rat median septum may play a role in expression of morphine conditioning due to dopamine release in this area.     

Role of D1/D2 dopamine receptors in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus in the rewarding effects of morphine administered into the ventral tegmental area

Considerable evidences show that the VTA, as a major source of dopamine neurons projecting to cortical and limbic regions, has a major role in cognitive and motivating aspects of addiction. The current study assessed the ability of the selective D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 and D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride administrated into the CA1 region of hippocampus (dorsal hippocampus) to alter the rewarding effects of intra-VTA administration of morphine using the conditioned place preference (CPP). After bilaterally implantation of cannulae into the CA1 and/or VTA in adult male Wistar rats weighing 210-310 g, dose-response effects of different doses of intra-VTA morphine (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 μg/side) on CPP paradigm were evaluated and animal displacement, conditioning score and locomotor activity were recorded by Ethovision software. In the next experiments, SCH 23390 (0.02, 0.05, 0.2 and 0.5 μg/side) or sulpiride (0.25, 0.75, 1.5 and 3 μg/side) were injected into the CA1, 5 min after intra-VTA injection of morphine during 3 days conditioning phase. Our results showed that intra-VTA morphine dose-dependently induces CPP in rats. Moreover, the blocking D1 and D2 receptors in the dorsal hippocampus decreased intra-VTA morphine-induced CPP significantly (P<0.01). Intra-CA1 administration of these antagonists alone, in all doses, could not induce CPP. We suggest that D1 and D2 receptors in the CA1 region of hippocampus have a key role in the development of CPP induced by morphine at the level of the VTA. It seems that there is an interaction between dopaminergic and opioidergic systems in these areas in reward circuit.     

Place preference conditioning reveals the involvement of D1-dopamine receptors in the motivational properties of mu- and kappa-opioid agonists

The role of D1 dopamine receptors in mediating the motivational properties of opioid agonists was investigated by use of place preference conditioning. Administration of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.001-0.5 mg/kg) or the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U-69593 (0.16 mg/kg) produced conditioned place aversions. In contrast, the mu-opioid agonist, morphine (3.0 mg/kg) was appetitively reinforcing. Chronic infusion of SCH 23390 (1.0 mg/kg/day) during conditioning abolished the effects of both opioid agonists. These data demonstrate the specific involvement of D1 receptors in the motivational properties of mu- and kappa-opioid agonists and suggest that dopaminergic systems are crucial for the expression of both reinforcing and aversive motivational states.     

Morphine-induced place preference in the CXBK mouse: characteristics of μ opioid receptor subtypes

The role of μ opioid receptor subtypes, μ₁ and μ₂, in morphine-conditioned place preference was examined using ddY and μ₁ opioid receptor-deficient CXBK mice. In ddY mice, the μ receptor agonist morphine caused a dose-related preference for the drug-associated place, but the κ agonist U-50,488H produced a dose-related place aversion. These results demonstrated that the mouse is available for place preference conditioning using opioids. Under this condition, the influence of pretreatment with selective μ₁ opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine morphine-induced place preference was investigated in ddY mice. Although pretreatment with the selective μ₁ antagonist naloxonazine (35 mg/kg, s.c.) did not modify the morphine-induced place preference, pretreatment with the selective μ antagonist β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA 10 mg/kg, s.c.) eliminated the appetitive effect of morphine. Furthermore, morphine (1–5 mg/kg, s.c.) produced a dose-related preference for the drug-associated place in CXBK mice. These findings suggest that the morphine-induced conditioned place preference may be mediated by naloxonazine-insensitive sites (μ₂ opioid receptors). In addition, chronic infusion of the dopamine D₁ antagonist SCH23390 (1.0 mg/kg/day) during the conditioning sessions eliminated the morphine-induced place preference in CXBK mice. Similarly, morphine combined with naloxonazine failed to produce the place preference in ddY mice chronically treated with SCH23390. The blocking effect of SCH23390 on the morphine-conditioned place preference suggests that μ₂ receptors may regulate the dopaminergic system, especially dopamine D₁ receptors, and are also involved in the reinforcing effects of morphine.     

SCH 23390-induced behavioral supersensitivity is not related to striatal c-fos levels

Stereotyped behavior and striatal c-fos levels induced by chronic treatment with the D₁ dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 have been investigated in rats which received subsequent subacute dopamine agonist treatment. SCH 23390 treatment (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 21 days increased both apomorphine-induced orofacial stereotypies and striatal c-fos levels. Treatment with the D₁ dopamine agonist SKF 38393 (10 mg/kg/day) and the combination of SKF 38393 with the D₂ dopamine agonist quinpirole (1 mg/kg/day), for 5 consecutive days, attenuated apomorphine-induced stereotypies without changing c-fos levels in rats previously treated with SCH 23390. These findings suggest that SCH 23390-induced behavioral supersensitivity and the increased striatal c-fos levels are concomitant but unrelated phenomena.     

Sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine depends on dopamine

The influence of dopamine (DA) on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine was evaluated. The effects of pre-treatment with saline or morphine plus naloxone, CGS 10746B, haloperidol, SCH 23390 and raclopride, on the place conditioning induced by 2 mg/kg morphine were evaluated. This dose was ineffective in saline pre-treated animals but induced a clear conditioned place preference in mice pre-treated with morphine, CGS 10746B or haloperidol. Conversely, animals pre-treated with morphine plus naloxone, CGS 10746B, SCH 23390, raclopride and the high dose of haloperidol did not acquire place preference. Our results demonstrated that DA release and subsequent DA D1 and D2 receptor activation is essential for the development of sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine.     

Activation of dopamine D1 receptors in the medial septum improves scopolamine-induced amnesia in the dorsal hippocampus

In the present study, we investigated the influence of intra-medial septum (intra-MS) injections of dopamine D1 receptor agents on amnesia induced by intra-CA1 injections of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, scopolamine. This study used a step-through inhibitory (passive) avoidance task to assess memory in adult male Wistar rats. The results showed that in the animals that received post-training intra-MS injections of saline, intra-CA1 administrations of scopolamine (0.75, 1, and 2 μg/rat) decreased inhibitory avoidance (IA) memory consolidation as evidenced by a decrease in step-through latency on the test day, which was suggestive of drug-induced amnesia. Post-training intra-MS injections of a dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF38393 at doses of 0.1, 0.15, and 0.3 μg/rat had no effect, but at dose of 0.5 μg/rat impaired IA memory consolidation. Interestingly, intra-MS injections of SKF38393 (0.15, 0.3 and 0.5 μg/rat) significantly prevented amnesia induced by intra-CA1 injections of scopolamine (1 μg/rat). Intra-MS injections of a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390 (0.5 and 0.75 μg/rat) by itself impaired IA memory consolidation, and also at dose of 0.75 μg/rat increased amnesia induced by intra-CA1 administrations of an ineffective dose of scopolamine (0.5 μg/rat). Post-training intra-MS injections of ineffective doses of SCH23390 (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 μg/rat) prevented an effective dose of SKF38393 response to the impaired effect of scopolamine. These results suggest that dopamine D1 receptors in the MS via projection neurons to the hippocampus affect impairment of memory consolidation induced by intra-CA injections of scopolamine.     

GABA(A) receptors in the basolateral amygdala are involved in mediating morphine reward

In the present study, the effects of intra-basolateral amygdala (BLA) injection of GABA(A) receptor agonist and antagonist on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in male Wistar rats have been investigated. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of different doses of morphine sulfate (1-9 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent CPP. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that the GABA(A) receptor agonist, muscimol (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) or the GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat), did not produce a significant place preference or place aversion. Intra-BLA administration of muscimol (0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) decreased the acquisition of CPP induced by morphine (6 mg/kg). On the other hand, intra-BLA injection of bicuculline (0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) in combination with an ineffective dose of morphine (1 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. The response of different doses of muscimol was attenuated by bicuculline (0.125 and 0.25 microg/rat). Furthermore, intra-BLA administration of bicuculline but not muscimol before testing significantly decreased the expression of morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The administration of the higher doses of bicuculline (0.25 and 0.5 microg/rat) during acquisition and the higher dose of muscimol (2 microg/rat) on the test day decreased the locomotor activity of the animals on the testing phase. It can be concluded that GABA(A) receptors in the amygdala are involved in morphine reward.     

Dorsal hippocampal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors are involved in mediating morphine reward

In the present study, the effects of bilateral injections of cholinergic agents into the hippocampal CA1 region on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were investigated in male Wistar rats. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of different doses of morphine sulphate (0.5-6 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent CPP. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that intra-CA1 administration of the anticholinesterase, physostigmine (2, 4 and 8 microg/rat) significantly potentiated the morphine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced CPP. Moreover, intra-CA1 administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist, atropine (1, 4 and 7 microg/rat) inhibited the morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced CPP dose-dependently. On the other hand, atropine (7 microg/rat, intra-CA1) reversed the physostigmine-induced potentiation of the morphine response. Furthermore, intra-CA1 administration of nicotine (0.5, 0.75 and 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. Bilateral injections of different doses of the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (2, 4 and 8 microg/rat) into the CA1 regions significantly inhibited the morphine (6 mg/kg)-induced CPP. Moreover mecamylamine (8 microg/rat, intra-CA1) decreased the effect of nicotine-induced potentiation of the morphine response. Intra-CA1 injections of physostigmine, atropine, nicotine or mecamylamine alone did not induce a significant place preference or place aversion. It may be concluded that the muscarinic and nicotinic receptors of the hippocampal CA1 regions play an important role in morphine reward.     

Activation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors increases the activity of the somatostatin receptor-effector system in the rat frontoparietal cortex

The role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in the regulation, in vivo, of the somatostatin (SRIF) receptor-effector system in rat frontoparietal cortex was investigated. The D1-receptor agonist SKF 38393 (4 mg/kg) or the D2-receptor agonist bromocriptine (2 mg/kg), administered intraperitoneally to rats, increased the number of SRIF receptors without altering the affinity constant, an effect antagonized by both SCH 23390 (0.25 mg/kg) and raclopride (5 mg/kg), D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, respectively. These antagonists alone had no effect on [(125)I]Tyr(3) octreotide binding to its receptors. No change in binding was detected when the dopamine agonists were added in vitro. Basal adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity was increased by SKF 38393 treatment and decreased by bromocriptine. Octreotide (SMS 201-995)-mediated inhibition of basal and forskolin-stimulated AC was increased by SKF 38393 or bromocriptine treatment. In frontoparietal cortical slices, basal inositol-1,4, 5-triphosphate (IP(3)) levels were decreased by bromocriptine treatment but were unaffected by SKF 38393. SMS 201-995 increased the IP(3) accumulation in control, SKF 38393-, and bromocriptine-treated rats. Insofar as SRIF and dopamine appear to be involved in motor regulation and could well modulate somatosensory functions in frontal and parietal cortex, respectively, heterologous receptor regulation may have important repercussions regarding the control exerted by these neurotransmitters on frontal and parietal cortical function in the intact animal.     

The Activation of NMDA Receptor–ERK Pathway in the Central Amygdala is Required for the Expression of Morphine-Conditioned Place Preference in the Rat

Reinforcing effects of addictive drugs can be evaluated with the conditioned place preference (CPP) test which involves both the action of drugs and environmental cues. However, the encoded neural circuits and underlying signaling mechanism are not fully understood. In this study, we have used morphine-CPP model in the rat and characterized the role of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in the central nuclei of amygdala (CeA) in the expression of morphine-induced CPP. We have found that morphine repeated pairing treatment causes a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine after 1 day or 7 days post-training, which is associated with increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation (p-ERK1/2, a measure of ERK activity) in the CeA. More than 80% of the positive p-ERK1/2 neurons express NMDA receptor subunit NR1 by double immunofluorescence studies. The infusion of either MEK inhibitor U0126 or NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 in the CeA not only suppresses the activation of ERK1/2 in the CeA but also abolishes the expression of CPP. These results suggest that the activation of the NMDA receptor–ERK signaling pathway in the CeA is required for the expression of morphine-induced place preference in the rat.     

The role of D1 and D2 receptors in the cocaine conditioned place preference of male and female rats

The rewarding effects of cocaine have been shown to be sexually dimorphic; female rats develop cocaine conditioned place preference at lower doses and with fewer cocaine pairings than male rats. The present study was conducted to determine whether D1 and D2 receptors contribute to sex differences in cocaine conditioned place preference using a 4-day paradigm. Fifteen minutes prior to receiving saline or cocaine (5mg/kg for females and 20mg/kg for males), rats were pretreated with either SCH 23390, a D1 receptor antagonist, (0.10, 0.25, or 0.50mg/kg), eticlopride, a D2 receptor antagonist, (0.05, 0.10, or 0.25mg/kg), or vehicle (saline). Antagonism of D1 receptors by SCH 23390 fully blocked cocaine conditioned place preference in male rats, while only the two lower doses of SCH 23390 blocked cocaine conditioned place preference in female rats. Conversely, antagonism of D2 receptors using eticlopride had no effect on cocaine conditioned place preference in male or female rats. Due to the known role of D1 receptors in cocaine conditioned place preference, sex differences in D1 receptor sensitivity may explain the differences observed in cocaine reward between male and female rats.     

Analysis of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor involvement in d- and l-amphetamine-induced anorexia in rats

The concept of dopamine receptor subtypes and the recent development of selective dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists raises the possibility of specific subtype involvement in amphetamine-induced anorexia, and, furthermore, provides the means to evaluate the possibility. Using a test of palatable food consumption by nondeprived male rats, our data confirmed a more potent suppressant effect of d-amphetamine on food intake, compared to l-amphetamine (potency ratio 5.32:1). The test proved sensitive, with ED50s of 0.28 mg/kg and 1.49 mg/kg for d- and l-amphetamine, respectively. The modest anorectic effect of 0.3 mg/kg d-amphetamine was completely reversed by the selective dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, but was not affected by the selective D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride. A matched feeding-suppressant effect of 1.0 mg/kg l-amphetamine was reversed at one dose of SCH 23390, but was unaffected by sulpiride. Stronger anorectic effects produced by 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine and 3.0 mg/kg l-amphetamine were not antagonized either by SCH 23390 or sulpiride. The selective D1 receptor agonist, SKF 38393, produced a dose-dependent reduction in food consumption, without producing behavioural stereotypy. Unlike amphetamine, SKF 38393 is not self-administered, and therefore may provide an example of a novel pharmacological dissociation between anorectic and reinforcing effects of drug treatments mediated by dopamine receptors. Our data implicate dopamine D1 receptors in the control of feeding responses, and suggest that these receptors may mediate the anorectic effect of small-dose amphetamine treatments.