Pre-operative balloon counterpulsation and off-pump coronary surgery for high-risk patients

Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) can be performed less invasively without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Multivessel off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is challenging in patients with critical left main stenosis (> 70%) and/or severe ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 0.35) Our objective was the evaluation of efficiency of intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively in this high-risk group in order to perform OPCABG safely. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a consecutive 10-month period (out of 88 OPCABG patients) 23 high-risk patients were treated and were compared with 15 on-pump patients (out of 69) with the same criteria. RESULTS: Preoperative implantation of IABP was significantly higher in the OPCABG group (70% vs 46%, p < 0.05). No conversion to CPB was required in the OPCABG group. Post-operative angiography was systematically performed and demonstrated 97.5% patency of anastomosis. No device-related complications occurred. No difference was found concerning age, risk factors, emergency surgery, ejection fraction, mean number of grafts per patient (2.64 versus 2.75) and average operating time. In contrast, OPCABG demonstrated a trend toward reduced morbidity in terms of atrial fibrillation, reexploration for bleeding and prolonged ventilator requirement > 12 h. Mortality was less in the OPCABG group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: More randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the true efficacy of elective IABP in OPCABG high-risk patients. Until such studies are evaluated, and therefore because older and sicker patients now constitute a greater percentage of candidates for OPCABG, the timing of application of the IABP is warranted. These results may further justify preoperative use of the IABP in a large proportion of this group of patients.     

Optimal timing of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump support in high-risk coronary patients.

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment, on outcome and cost, in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting have been demonstrated. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to determine the optimal timing for preoperative IABP support in a cohort of high-risk patients. METHODS: Sixty consecutive high-risk patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (presenting with two or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30, unstable angina, reoperation, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. Thirty patients did not receive preoperative IABP (controls), 30 patients had preoperative IABP therapy starting 2 hours (T2), 12 hours (T12), or 24 hours (T24), by random assignment, before the operation. Fifty patients had preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction mean, less than 0.30 (less than 0.26+/-0.08), (n = 40) unstable angina, 28% (n = 17) left main stenosis, and 32% (n = 19) were reoperations. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in the IABP groups. There was one death in the IABP group and six in the control group. The complication rate for IABP was 8.3% (n = 5) without group differences. Cardiac index was significantly higher postoperatively (p<0.001) in patients with preoperative IABP treatment compared with controls. There were no significant differences between the three IABP subgroups at any time. The incidence of postoperative low cardiac output was significantly lower in the IABP groups (p<0.001). Intubation time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital was shorter in the IABP groups (p = 0.211, p<0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no differences between the IABP subgroups in any of the studied variables. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting was confirmed. There were no differences in outcome between the subgroups; therefore, at 2 hours preoperatively, IABP therapy can be started.     

Intraaortic balloon pump therapy facilitates posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Background. Displacement of the heart to expose posterior vessels during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG, or OPCAB) may impair cardiac function. We used the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively to reduce operative risk and to facilitate posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients with left main coronary artery disease (> 75% stenosis), intractable resting angina, postinfarction angina, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%), or unstable angina.

Methods. One hundred and forty-two consecutive patients who underwent multivessel OPCAB including posterior vessel revascularization were studied prospectively. The patients were divided into group I (n = 57), which received preoperative or intraoperative IABP, and group II (n = 85), which did not receive IABP. In group I, there were 34 patients with left main coronary artery disease, 24 patients with intractable resting angina, 8 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, 5 patients with postinfarction angina, and 40 patients with unstable angina. Seven patients received intraoperative IABP support owing to hemodynamic instability during OPCAB.

Results. There was no operative mortality in group I and 1 death in group II. The average number of distal anastomoses was not different between group I and group II (3.4 ± 0.9 versus 3.5 ± 0.9, p = not significant). There were no significant differences in the number of posterior vessel anastomoses per patient. There were no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit, hospital stay, and morbidity between the two groups. There was one IABP-related complication in group I.

Conclusions. IABP therapy facilitates posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients, and surgical results are comparable with those in lower-risk patients.     

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.     

Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

The beneficial effects of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have been reported. However, the benefits of insertion of IABP electively in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have not been established. Six hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent OPCAB form the study group. High-risk patients fulfilling two or more of the following: left main stem stenosis >70%, unstable angina, and poor left ventricular function, who had elective insertion of IABP preoperatively by the open technique (group I; n = 20) were compared with a similar high-risk group that did not (group II; n = 25). There were no significant differences in risk factors between the two groups (Euroscore 5.68). The mean number of grafts was similar. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, duration of ventilation, arrhythmias, cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, and infective complications (p = NS). There were no IABP-related complications. Acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration was higher in group II (n = 5; p < 0.05). Four patients (16%) in group II required postoperative IABP. Although intensive care stay was longer in group I (27.6 +/- 15.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 9.1 hours; p < 0.05), patients in group I were discharged earlier from hospital. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in each group). In high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB, routine preoperative insertion of IABP electively reduces the incidence of acute renal failure. In addition it avoids the need for emergency insertion postoperatively and may result in earlier discharge.     

Evaluation of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping for high risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

We evaluated the effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) support in high risk patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Between November 1999 and December 2010, 65 high-risk patients underwent OPCAB with the support of IABP inserted preoperatively. High risks were considered as (1) left main coronary artery stem stenosis > or = 75%, (2) unstable angina requiring intravenous nitrates and heparin, (3) preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30%, (4) bilateral carotid artery stenosis > or = 75%. There were no hospital deaths or cerebrovascular complications. During operations, hemodynamics was stable with the support of low dose catecholamines, and no patient needed conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were able to be weaned from IABP within 3 days (mean 5.7 hours) after the operation and were extubated within 4 days (mean 11.5 hours) after the operation. One patient had a peripheral embolism which might be related to insertion of IABP (1.5%). Preoperative IABP in high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB was considered to be useful and safe.     

Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation for high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass operations

BACKGROUND: Dislocations of the heart required for exposure and construction of distal anastomoses often produce hemodynamic instability when performing coronary artery revascularization without using cardiopulmonary perfusion (OPCAB). We report our early experience with elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) to enable and facilitate selected high-risk patients to undergo OPCAB. METHODS: Sixteen high-risk patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB using elective IABP are reported. The patients were believed to be at increased risk because of the presence of severe proximal multivessel coronary artery obstruction, ventricular dysfunction, recent acute myocardial infarction, cardiomegaly-cardiomyopathy, and documented cerebral vascular disease. The presence of significant comorbid disease also made the avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass desirable, if at all possible, in all patients. RESULTS: The IABP appeared to facilitate the intraoperative management of our series of patients. This was evidenced by improved hemodynamic stability and virtual elimination of the need for inotropic support during the dislocations of the heart needed for exposure and construction of distal anastomoses. There were no complications related to use of IABP. There was one death. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this strategy to use IABP selectively can allow surgeons to safely extend the benefits of OPCAB procedures to high-risk patients and avoid dangerous hemodynamic instability that otherwise, often occurs.     

Intracoronary shunt reduces postoperative troponin leaks: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether intracoronary shunt usage reduced the myocardial damage on the basis of the cardiac markers when compared with the shuntless anastomosis in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) surgery of isolated left anterior descending artery lesions. METHODS: Forty patients who had stable angina with isolated left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery lesion undergoing OPCABG surgery were randomized into two groups. Shunt group consisted of 20 patients who had OPCABG using intracoronary shunt, whereas the shuntless group consisted of 20 patients who underwent OPCABG without using intracoronary shunt. Cardiac troponin I, CK, and CK-MB before and 24h after the surgery were assessed in the groups. RESULTS: There were no deaths in the study. The two groups were similar with respect to sex and age. Duration of LIMA-LAD anastomosis was significantly higher in the shunt group (p=0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups concerning the preoperative and postoperative CK and CK-MB levels. The preoperative troponin I levels of the groups were not different (p=0.238; NS), whereas postoperative levels of this marker was significantly higher in the shuntless group (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Intracoronary shunt reduced the postoperative troponin I levels significantly, so it may be indicated in the patients who are thought to be susceptible to transient ischemia.     

Beneficial Effect of Preventative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping in High-Risk Patients Undergoing First-Time Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting—A Single Center Experience

Although intra‐aortic balloon pumping (IABP) has been used widely as a routine cardiac assist device for perioperative support in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the optimal timing for high‐risk patients undergoing first‐time CABG using IABP is unknown. The purpose of this investigation is to compare preoperative and preventative IABP insertion with intraoperative or postoperative obligatory IABP insertion in high‐risk patients undergoing first‐time CABG. We reviewed our IABP patients' database from 2002 to 2007; there were 311 CABG patients who received IABP treatment perioperatively. Of 311 cases, 41 high‐risk patients who had first‐time on‐pump or off‐pump CABG (presenting with three or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.45, unstable angina, CABG combined with aneurysmectomy, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. We compared perioperatively the clinical results of 20 patients who underwent preoperative IABP placement (Group 1) with 21 patients who had obligatory IABP placement intraoperatively or postoperatively during CABG (Group 2). There were no differences in preoperative risk factors, except left ventricular aneurysm resection, between the two groups. There were no differences in indications for high‐risk patients between the two groups. The mean number of grafts was similar. There were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, or in cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and infective complications postoperatively. There were no IABP‐related complications in either group. Major adverse cardiac event (severe hypotension and/or shock, myocardial infarction, and severe hemodynamic instability) was higher in Group 2 (14 [66.4%] vs. 1 [5%], P < 0.0001) during surgery. The time of IABP pumping in Group 1 was shorter than in Group 2 (72.5 ± 28.9 h vs. 97.5 ± 47.7 h, P < 0.05). The duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay in Group 1 was significantly shorter than in Group 2, respectively (22.0 ± 1.6 h vs. 39.6 ± 2.1 h, P < 0.01 and 58.0 ± 1.5 h vs. 98.5 ± 1.9 h, P < 0.005). There were no differences in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in Group 1 and n = 3 in Group 2). Preoperative and preventative insertion of IABP can be performed safely in selected high‐risk patients undergoing CABG, with results comparable to those in patients who received obligatory IABP intraoperatively and postoperatively. Therefore, earlier IABP support as part of surgical strategy may help to improve the outcome in high‐risk first‐time CABG patients.     

Intraaortic balloon pumping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Beneficial effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) treatment in high-risk patients who had open heart surgery have been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients having CABG at our institution were reviewed. Patients having an IABP were identified retrospectively and grouped into one of 3 groups as follows. Group A (n = 14): preoperative IABP for high-risk urgent or elective cases. Group B (n = 26): preoperative IABP for emergency cases. Group C (n = 6): unplanned intraoperative or postoperative IABP. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had an IABP (16.6% of total). Parsonnet score in group B was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Length of operation for group C was significantly longer (p < 0.05). Overall hospital mortality in the total group of 277 cases was 4.2%. Hospital mortality was 7.1% in group A, 7.7% in group B, and 50% in group C. Hospital mortality in group C was significantly higher (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative treatment with IABP in high-risk patients undergoing CABG was confirmed. This approach resulted in a significantly lower hospital mortality.     

The effect and role of the intraaortic balloon pumping in off-pump coronary artery bypass

Eighty consecutive patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) were studied. They were divided into group I (n = 10) which received preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and group II (n = 70) which did not receive IABP. The indications for preoperative IABP were severe left main coronary artery disease in 7 patients, severe 3 vessel disease in 3 patients, unstable angina in 5 patients, acute myocardial infarction in 3 patients. There was no operative mortality in both groups. The average number of distal anastomosis 2.7/patients in group I and 3.3/patients in group II. There was no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and morbidity between 2 groups. The average postoperative IABP support time was 5.4 hours. There was no IABP-related complication in group I. IABP was very effective to perform OPCAB surgery safety. Preoperative IABP may be effective modality to support OPCAB surgery not only in emergent case but also in elective case.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases morbidity and mortality in a selected group of high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: The ideal indication for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) has yet to be defined. High-risk surgical patients may benefit the most when cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross clamping, and cardioplegic arrest are avoided. The aim of this study was to determine whether off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting might decrease the operative morbidity and mortality in a select group of high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: Utilizing a Parsonnet risk stratification model we analyzed prospectively collected data on a cohort of high-risk coronary artery disease patients, which were operated on with beating-heart technology by the same group of surgeons in a tertiary care university medical center. High-risk patients were defined as those with a Parsonnet score of 15 or greater. RESULTS: Fifty-seven multivessel disease OPCABG patients (over a period of 2 years) had markedly increased Parsonnet scores (24.3 +/- 10.6). The average ejection fraction of the patients was 42% (+/-12.3) and their age ranged from 52 to 85 years (mean 70.6 +/- 10.4, 26% women). Unstable angina was present in 42 patients (74%) and 10 patients underwent OPCABG within 24 hours of the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction. In addition to severe coronary artery disease 32% of the patients presented with congestive heart failure, insulin-dependent diabetes (18%), renal failure (22%), peripheral vascular disease (31%), pulmonary disease (18%), and neurologic disorders (14%). An average of 2.6 +/- 0.9 grafts/patient were performed and the posterior descending artery or marginal branches of the circumflex artery or both were grafted in 90%. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.5% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: OPCABG can be performed with a reasonable low morbidity and mortality in this select group of high-risk patients. OPCABG is a reasonable, and might even be preferable, operative strategy in this high-risk group of patients.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Excellent results in a group of selected high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) has assumed an increasing role in many surgical practices. The ideal candidate has not been defined, but high-risk patients seem to benefit most when cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross clamping and cardioplegic arrest are avoided. METHODS: Fourteen high-risk patients (age 52 to 81 years, 1 female, EF 44%+/-8, Parsonnet score 23+/-4) were studied. They presented with acute coronary syndroms on platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, acute myocardial infarction, worsening renal failure, decompensating ischemic cardiomyopathy, religious beliefs and denial of blood transfusion, and severe peripheral/cerebrovascular disease (total bilateral internal carotid artery occlusion and/or >90% stenosis). These patients underwent OPCABG via sternotomy with the intention of complete coronary revascularization. RESULTS: An average of 2.3 grafts/patient were performed and the posterior descending artery (PDA) and marginal branches of the circumflex artery (LCX) were grafted in 79% of the patients. There were 3 events of intraoperative cardiac arrest precipitated by occlusion of right coronary artery (RCA) or positioning a cardiomegaly heart leading to immediate intravascular shunting (2) and/or conversion to CPB (1). One patient was converted to CPB and graft revision (intraoperative ultrasound and probing). The mortality rate was 0% and one stroke was observed on post-operative day 1. Coronary angiography (n=6) showed no significant stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: OPCABG complete revascularization is feasible in high-risk patients with low morbidity and mortality and excellent early RESULTS: OPCABG may be indicated in patients on platelet receptor antagonists preventing bleeding complications. Cardiomegaly can cause difficult off-pump LCX and PDA exposure and stabilization. RCA grafting off-pump is less tolerated and PDA grafting is preferred. High-risk patients for CPB are the ones who may benefit the most from OPCABG.     

术前脑梗死对冠状动脉旁路移植术后恢复的影响

目的 探讨术前脑梗死对冠状动脉旁路移植(CABG)术后病人恢复的影响.方法 112例术前有脑梗死的择期非体外循环CABG(OPCABG)病人为研究组.随机择期OPCABG病人按研究组1:1配对做为对照组,对照组术前无脑梗死病史.手术时间与相配对的研究组相近,同一组医师手术.结果 研究组术后苏醒时间、拔管时间、ICU时间及住院时间明显长于对照组(P<0.01),分别为(6.4±4.0)h与(4.6±2.7)h、(19.6±9.7)h与(16.8±5.5)h、(27.3±16.8)h与(22.1±10.6)h及(23.4±10.0)天与(19.5±5.6)天.两组麻醉时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).研究组术后谵妄、脑卒中及二次插管的发生率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),分别为15.2%与6.3%、7.1%与0.9%及7.1%与0.9%,RR值及95%可信区间分别为4.83和1.57～14.86、8.54和1.05～69.45、8.54和1.05～69.45.结论 非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术病人中,术前合并脑梗死者术后苏醒时间、ICU及住院时间均延长;术后谵妄、脑卒中及二次插管的发生率较术前无脑梗死者高.     

Preoperative intraaortic balloon pumps in high-risk patients undergoing open heart surgery

BACKGROUND: The use of the preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction or unstable angina with critical coronary anatomy is becoming more frequent as surgical casemix changes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients having open heart surgery. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for 645 consecutive patients were reviewed. Patients receiving an IABP were identified and grouped as follows: group A (preoperative IABP for high-risk nonemergent cases), group B (preoperative IABP for emergent cases), and group C (intra/postoperative IABP). Risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates in these three groups was compared using the modified Parsonnet score for preoperative risk stratification. RESULTS: IABPs were used in 101 cases (16%). The predicted versus actual hospital mortality rate was 20% versus 5.7% in group A, 32.1% versus 47.6% in group B, and 12.6% versus 22.2% in group C (group A vs group B, p = 0.0014; group A vs group C, p = 0.012). IABP-related morbidity occurred in 3% of cases (all in group C). CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted mortality was significantly lower in high-risk cases with preoperative IABPs compared with emergent cases and intraoperative/postoperative IABPs. We encourage the use of preoperative IABPs in selected high-risk patients.     

A prospective evaluation of hemodynamic instability during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: Despite recognized hemodynamic derangements during cardiac displacement, most patients appear to tolerate the off-pump procedure well. However, some patients unpredictably become hemodynamically unstable requiring emergency cardiopulmonary bypass or intra-aortic balloon pump support. After an experience of 5306 multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypasses (OPCABs), this study was undertaken to determine the factors that would identify the patients who were at a higher risk for the procedure. DESIGN: Prospective clinical investigation. SETTING: Tertiary care academic cardiac care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred consecutive patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB from September to December 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Various cardiac and extracardiac factors were charted in prespecified data-entry forms. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to determine if any identifiable factors were predictors of a higher risk of unacceptable hemodynamic instability during OPCAB. Institution of IABP support or conversion to CPB were the endpoints of the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 500 patients studied, significant hemodynamic instability developed in 24 (4.8%) patients. IABP support was instituted in 16 (3.2%) patients, and 8 (1.6%) were converted to CPB. Stepwise logistic regression identified ejection fraction <25% (p < 0.001), myocardial infarction of <1-month duration (p = 0.009), congestive heart failure (p = 0.016), and preoperative hemodynamic instability (p = 0.057) as predictors of conversion during OPCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction <25%, myocardial infarction of <1-month duration, congestive heart failure, or preoperative hemodynamic instability constitute the high-risk group for OPCAB.     

Evolving Indications for Preoperative Intraaortic Balloon Pump Assistance

Over a two-year period about 1,000 operations were performed with cardiopulmonary bypass. Intraaortic balloon pump assistance (IABP) was employed on 150 occasions, and a review of these has permitted clarification of the indications for its use.Sixty patients had IABP for cardiogenic shock either after infarction or after cardiotomy, and 37 (62%) survived. Preoperative IABP in 90 high-risk patients resulted in survival for 79 (88%). The indications for prophylactic IABP included: (1) relief of severe pain, which occurred in 42 patients with acute coronary insufficiency, (2) improvement in the coronary perfusion pressure, which was accomplished in 20 patients with significant left main coronary artery occlusion or its equivalent, and (3) protection of left ventricular function, which was carried out in 28 patients with an LV ejection fraction of less than 0.40. The significance of the preoperative endocardial viability ratio (EVR) in relation to prophylactic IABP was also assessed: an EVR below 0.70 appears to be an indication for preoperative IABP.     

The Impact of Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation on Bypass Graft Flow in Patients with Peripheral ECMO

Abstract   Objective: Numerous reports have been performed to investigate the hemodynamic effects of intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) and nonpulsatile circulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but studies on its impact on coronary artery bypass graft flow during concomitant use of IABP and ECMO are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of additional IABP support on the degree of blood flow increase in bypass grafts in high-risk patients with nonpulsatile femoral venoarterial ECMO. Methods: In six emergency coronary artery bypass graft patients (mean age = 66.3 ± 2.1 years, gender = five males and one female, ejection fraction = 25.0 ± 3.0%) requiring mechanical circulatory support with ECMO hemodynamic parameters and bypass graft flows were measured with and without IABP counterpulsation. A transit time flowmeter was used for intraoperative graft flow and pulsatility index (PI) measurements. Patients provided their control values. Results: The average value of the mean arterial pressure recorded prior to IABP was 63.6 + 2.9 mmHg and during IABP support 67.8 + 2.9 mmHg (p < 0.0001). IABP augmented the mean bypass graft flow from 46.8 ± 9.6 mL/min to 56.4 ± 12.1 mL/min (p < 0.005), resulting in a 17% increase. The difference in the PI was not statistically significant (2.6 ± 0.2 with IABP, 2.6 ± 0.3 without IABP). Conclusions: We conclude that IABP-induced pulsatility significantly improves coronary bypass graft flows during nonpulsatile peripheral ECMO.     

Elective preoperative use of intra aortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk group of coronary artery disease patients to facilitate off pump surgery

Background To avoid the deleterious effects of cardio-pulmonary bypass, off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) is increasingly the procedure of choice in the majority of patients needing myocardial revascularization. However patients at high operative risk are sometimes not given the advantage of off pump surgery because of haemodynamic deterioration during displacement of the heart to access the target vessels, or deterioration per se due to the factor causing the high risk (eg unstable hemodynamics) leading to institution of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB). Preoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) therapy improves cardiac performance and facilitates the access to the anastomotic site during off pump coronary artery bypass grafting while maintaining haemodynamic stability. Methods Two hundred and twelve patients for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between June 2000 and June 2006 were studied in whom preoperative IABC was instituted. Initially, the trial was started in two groups and patients were computer randomized to ‘IABC’ and ‘No IABC’ groups. The trial was abandoned after 15 cases in each group, because of the adverse outcomes in ‘No IABC’ group. Left main stenosis was present in 31.1%, triple vessel disease in 87.7%, recent myocardial infarction in 21.2%, 35.8% were hypertensive, and 32% were diabetic. Results Out of 212 cases in whom preoperative IABC was instituted OPCABG was possible in the majority (88.2%), while of 15 cases in ‘No IABP’ group all CABG were done on CPB. Mortality and average stay in ICU was markedly lower in patients where IABC was instituted preoperatively. Conclusions Elective preoperative IABC in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease permits OPCABG in the majority, reduces the ICU stay, leads to earlier weaning from intra aortic balloon pump (IABP), reduces the morbidity and mortality, and is more economical.     

冠心病手术方式对IABP应用的影响

目的:探讨冠心病手术方式对主动脉内球囊反搏(intra-aortic balloon pump,IABP)的影响。方法;冠心病手术176例,27例为非体外循环心脏跳动下的手术。在149例体外循环(cardio-pulmonary bypass,CPB)下的手术中,单纯冠状动脉搭桥(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)35例,CABG 激光心肌血管重建(Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization,TMLR)联合手术114例,其中29例加做室壁瘤切除、室间隔穿孔修补、瓣膜置换手术,9例于术中安置临时心外膜起搏器。结果:149例体外循环下的手术中共置入IABP23例,其中120例常规手术组中应用IABP15例,29例有附加手术组中应用IABP8例,而27例非体外循环下的手术中无IABP的应用。结论:(1)应用LABP数量在常规手术组与术中加做室壁瘤切除、瓣膜置换术或成型术、室间隔穿孔修补术(p<0.05),安置临时心外膜起搏器(P<0.01),组比较结果均有统计学意义;(2)激光心肌血管重建术,无论与何种冠心病手术联合应用,无论激光打孔数量多少,都没有增加IABP的应用;(3)未发现冠脉搭桥数量与IABP有关。