Aneurysm rupture is independently associated with increased late mortality in those surviving abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define whether veterans who survived repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) experienced late survival rates similar to those surviving repair of intact AAA. METHODS: All veterans undergoing AAA repair in DRGs 110 and 111 during fiscal years 1991-1995 were identified using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Patient Treatment File (PTF). Late mortality was defined using VA administrative databases including the Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator System and PTF. Illness severity and patient complexity were defined using PTF discharge data that were further analyzed by Patient Management Category software. Veterans were followed up to 6 years after AAA repair. RESULTS: During the study, 5833 veterans underwent repair of intact AAA while 427 had repair of ruptured AAA in all VA medical centers. Operative mortality was defined as that which occurred within 30 days of surgery or during the same hospitalization as aneurysm repair. For those undergoing repair of intact AAA, operative mortality thus defined was 4.5% (265/5833). Operative mortality was 46% (195/427) after repair of ruptured AAA. Overall mortality (including operative mortality) during 2.62+/-1.61 years follow-up was 22% (1282/5833) with intact AAA versus 61% (260/427) for those with ruptured AAA (P<0.001). Further analysis of survival outcomes was performed in patients who survived AAA repair (i.e., those who were discharged alive and lived 30 days or more after surgery). Of those who initially survived repair of ruptured AAA, 28% (65/232) died during follow-up versus 18% (1017/5568) who initially survived repair of intact AAA (odds ratio 1.74; 95% confidence limits 1.30-2.34; P<0.001). In those initially surviving AAA repair, stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing age, illness severity, patient complexity, as well as AAA rupture and aortic graft complications were increasingly and independently associated with late mortality. Mean survival time was 1681 days for those who survived >30 days and who were discharged alive after repair of ruptured AAA versus 1821 days for those who initially survived repair of intact AAA (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to higher postoperative mortality rates with ruptured AAA, mortality during follow-up for survivors of AAA repair was also greater for those who survived repair of ruptured AAA. The toll taken by ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms did not end in the immediate postoperative period.     

Thoracovisceral segment aneurysm repair after previous infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVE: Repair of thoracovisceral aortic aneurysms (TVAA) after previous open repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) poses significant challenges. We sought to better characterize such recurrent aneurysms and to evaluate their operative outcome. METHODS: We reviewed the records and radiographs of 49 patients who underwent repair of TVAAs between 1988 and 2002 after previous repair of an AAA. Visceral artery reconstructions were completed with combinations of beveled anastomoses, inclusion patches, and side arm grafts. In 14 patients visceral endarterectomy was required to treat associated occlusive disease. Sixteen patients had cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and 10 patients had distal perfusion during cross-clamping. RESULTS: Patient mean age was 72 years, and 80% were men. Fifty-one percent of patients had symptomatic disease, and average TVAA diameter was 6.2 cm. Mean time between AAA and TVAA repair was 77 months. Twenty-six percent of aneurysms were restricted to the lower visceral aortic segment, 35% extended to the diaphragm, another 35% extended to the distal or middle thoracic aorta, and 4% involved the entire remaining visceral and thoracic aorta. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 4.1% in patients with nonruptured aneurysms and 50% in patients with ruptured aneurysms, for an overall mortality rate of 8.2%. Fifteen patients (30.6%) had major morbidity, including paresis in two patients and dialysis-dependent renal failure in five patients. At late follow-up, three patients required further aortic operations to treat additional aneurysms, and four patients had fatal aortic ruptures. Two-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 61% (+/-7.5%) and 37% (+/-7.8%), respectively. At univariate analysis, operative blood loss was the sole significant predictor of major morbidity (P <.023), and rupture (P <.030, P <.0001) and aneurysm extent (P <.0007, P <.0001) correlated with both operative death and long-term survival. Only aneurysm extent (P <.010, relative risk 37.3) remained a significant predictor of long-term survival at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Elective repair of TVAAs after previous AAA repair can be performed with an acceptable level of operative mortality, though with considerable operative morbidity. Limited long-term survival mandates careful patient selection, and the high mortality associated with ruptured TVAA underscores the need for post-AAA surveillance.     

Aortic aneurysms in children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis: report of two cases and review of the literature

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in children and young adults are rare; some have been observed in patients with tuberous sclerosis (TS). We report two cases and review the literature. A 9-year-old girl with TS was diagnosed with a 3-cm calcified AAA, and a 41-year-old man with TS was diagnosed with a 7.5-cm thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Both patients underwent open repair with a tube polyester graft without complication. They are both doing well at 7 and 8 years after surgery. Pathologic evaluation revealed medial atrophy and focal medial disruption in the aortic wall in both patients. With our two cases, 15 patients with TS and aneurysms have been reported; 12 had AAA, and four had TAA (one patient had both). Three AAAs and two TAAs ruptured. Six patients died because of aneurysmal disease. There is an association between TS and aortic aneurysms. Patients should be screened for aortic aneurysms at the time TS is diagnosed and annually thereafter. Because of the high risk of rupture, early elective repair is suggested. New aortic aneurysms after repair may also develop.     

Distal embolization as a presenting symptom of aortic aneurysms

The records of 302 patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair between 1985 and 1990 were reviewed. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (82%) were asymptomatic, while 32 patients (11%) had ruptured aneurysms. During this period, 15 patients (5%) presented with distal embolization as the first manifestation of their AAA. The preoperative embolic event resulted in limb-threatening ischemia in 3 patients, digital ischemia in 11, and calf myonecrosis in 1. CT scan was performed in 14 of 15 patients demonstrating irregular, heterogeneous thrombus within the AAA. Only two of the AAAs were larger than 5 cm. Angiography demonstrated occlusive lesions but was not diagnostic for AAA in seven patients and resulted in three episodes of embolization. AAA was repaired with a tube graft in 4 patients while a bifurcated graft was required in 11 patients for aneurysmal (in 4 patients) and occlusive disease (in 7 patients) of the iliac arteries. All cases employed a transperitoneal approach, systemic heparin, and distal occlusion prior to aortic clamping. Complications included three major (below-knee) and five minor amputations, developing or worsening renal failure in five patients (33%), and death in two (13%). In comparison, mortality was 5% for elective repair and 66% for rupture during this same period. CT scan was safer and more informative than angiography. The morbidity of patients with AAA presenting with emboli is comparable with rupture. The risk of embolization does not correlate with size and indicates the potentially dangerous nature of small AAAs.     

Clamp before you cut: Proximal control of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using endovascular balloon occlusion--Case reports

While the mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has declined over the last several decades, the rate for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has unfortunately remained disturbingly high. Undiagnosed aneurysms may present with little warning until abdominal pain, syncope, and hypotension signify rupture. Fifty percent of patients with ruptured aneurysms die before reaching a medical facility, and their survival is highly dependent on hemodynamic stability at presentation. The degree of rupture containment and comorbid status of the patient determine hemodynamic stability. Endovascular stent grafting has significantly improved perioperative morbidity and mortality rates for elective AAA repair, and some of the same endovascular techniques can be used to obtain proximal control in patients presenting with RAAA. We describe 3 consecutive cases of RAAA where proximal control was obtained using a percutaneously placed, transfemoral aortic occlusion balloon before induction of anesthesia.     

Factors influencing late survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: To determine the factors influencing the prognosis of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), the clinical characteristics and long-term survival of 366 consecutive patients were examined and compared with those in previous Western studies. METHODS: During the period from January 1979 to December 1995, 376 patients with AAA were admitted to our hospital. Among these, 332 consecutive patients underwent elective reconstruction of infrarenal AAAs. The remaining 44 patients were not surgically treated. With use of the data from the patients who underwent AAA resection, the relationship of various risk factors, such as cardiac dysfunction, hypertension, renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, and age, to survival rate was investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 0.6%. The survival of the patients who underwent the operation at 5 years was 71.0% and at 10 years 51.8%. The survival rate of the patients who were not surgically treated at 5 years was 26.0% and at 10 years 14.9%. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups. A univariate analysis was performed on each possible risk factor affecting survival rates. In relation to the survival rate of 5 and 10 years, there was no statistical significant difference between patients with or without heart disease or hypertension. By contrast, factors influencing long-term survival were associated with renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, and age at time of surgery. Multivariate analysis of risk factors affecting survival rates demonstrated that renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, and age at the time of operation were found to be significant, respectively. The main cause of the death for the long-term survival patients with AAA repair was malignancy, whereas that in the patients without repair was rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors influencing survival after AAA repair were renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, and advanced age in Japanese patients. In addition, the main cause of death after aneurysmal resection was malignancy. These results were different from outcomes in Western patients. We need to carefully watch out for malignancy during the follow-up period after AAA resection.     

Surgical repair of ruptured aortic sinus of Valsalva aneurysm

Surgical repair of ruptured aortic sinus of Valsalva aneurysm was performed on six patients. The NYHA functional class was I in one case, II in three and III in two cases. All aneurysms had ruptured into the right atrium. Three originated from the right, and three from the non-coronary aortic sinus of Valsalva. The preoperative shunt was 55-200% (mean 118%) of the peripheral cardiac output. At aneurysmal repair, closure of secundum-type atrial septal defect was performed in one case and insertion of a St Jude Medical aortic valve in another. There were no perioperative deaths. Five patients were asymptomatic in the follow-up period (5 months-17 years). One patient died of cardiomyopathy 11 years postoperatively. The long-term results after surgical repair of ruptured aortic sinus of Valsalva aneurysm thus were good, and early operation is recommended in order to avoid congestive heart failure.     

Ruptured inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm: insights in clinical management and outcome

BACKGROUND: Ruptured inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is relatively rare, and little has been written on the outcome of operative treatment. METHODS: Patients undergoing attempted repair of ruptured inflammatory AAA between 1995 and 2001 were included in a retrospective case-cohort study. Demographic, clinical, and operative factors were analyzed, together with in-hospital morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 297 patients who underwent attempted operative repair of ruptured AAA, 24 (8%) had an inflammatory aneurysm. Twenty-two patients were men, and two were women; median age was 69 years (range, 51-85 years). Operative findings revealed a contained hematoma in 16 patients (70%), free rupture in 3 patients (13%), aortocaval fistula in 4 patients (17%), and aortoenteric fistula in 1 patient (4%). Of 273 noninflammatory ruptured AAAs, only 2 AAA (1%) were associated with primary aortic fistula. Ten patients (42%) with inflammatory AAA died in hospital, compared with 117 of 273 patients (43%) without inflammation. Median postoperative stay was 10 days (range, 0-35 days). Of the 14 patients with inflammatory lesions who survived, 11 had postoperative complications; 4 patients had acute renal failure, three of whom required temporary renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured inflammatory AAA is associated with a higher incidence of aortic fistula than is ruptured noninflammatory AAA. Repair of ruptured inflammatory AAA is not associated with increased operative mortality compared with repair of ruptured noninflammatory AAA.     

Unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysm: presentation and natural history

The natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is death from rupture unless the patient dies from another cause prior to rupture. Elective aortic grafting is the treatment of choice. Following rupture, emergency operation is the only treatment which will prolong the patient's survival. Controversy still exists as to the optimum management in poor risk patients and in those with a small aneurysm. This paper describes the presentation and natural history of 65 patients presenting with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm who did not have an emergency operation, and a further 27 patients in whom the diagnosis of intact AAA was made who did not have an elective aortic replacement graft. The correct diagnosis was made at the time of admission in only 43 of the 65 patients with ruptured aneurysms. The diagnostic errors and appropriate investigations in cases of doubt are discussed. The mean time from admission to hospital to death was 8 hours. The reasons for not performing an elective operation in the 27 patients known to have AAA are given. Nine have subsequently died from rupture. There have been 7 deaths from other causes.     

Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background

Open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) generally involves postsurgery admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Few studies have evaluated the impact of surgery for either ruptured or nonruptured AAA (with postoperative ICU treatment) on long-term survival and quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to quantify long-term survival and health-related quality of life (HrQpL) of a cohort of patients undergoing open AAA repair after hospital discharge.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing open elective or acute AAA reconstruction with postoperative admission to the ICU and discharged alive from the hospital during 2009 were identified. Primary outcome measures were 1-year and long-term mortality. The secondary outcome was the HrQoL using the EuroQol-6D (EQ-6D) questionnaire at the end of the follow-up period.

Results

A total of 263 patients were treated and postoperatively discharged alive: 56 had a ruptured AAA (rAAA), 35 a symptomatic AAA, and 172 an asymptomatic AAA. The 1-year mortality after open AAA repair was 8 %. Overall, 39 % of patients died within 10 postoperative years (mean 6.0 ± 2.8 years). Long-term survival of patients with a ruptured or symptomatic aneurysm was similar to that of patients undergoing elective aneurysm repair. Long-term HrQoL of the total study population was worse than that of an age-matched general Dutch population on the EQ-us (range 0–1, difference 0.12). This decrease in HrQoL was mainly seen in mobility, self-care, usual activities, and cognition.

Conclusions

Ten years after open AAA repair, the overall survival rate was 59 %. Long-term survival and HrQoL were similar for patients with a repaired ruptured or symptomatic aneurysm and those who underwent elective aneurysm repair. There were also no differences in patients with infrarenal versus juxtarenal/suprarenal aneurysms. Surviving patients had a lower HrQoL than the age-matched general Dutch population, especially regarding mobility, self-care, usual activities, and cognition.     

颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞治疗术中动脉瘤再破裂的防治

目的颅内动脉瘤在弹簧圈栓塞过程中发生破裂是最可怕的术中并发症之一，本文探讨处理、预防这一并发症的初步经验。方法2002年4月-2006年12月，共有153例患有颅内动脉瘤的患者在我院接受了可脱卸弹簧圈栓塞治疗，其中141例患者曾有过动脉瘤破裂引起蛛网膜下腔出血史。5例有动脉瘤破裂出血史的患者术中再次发生动脉瘤破裂。术中动脉瘤再破裂时，常规使用鱼精蛋白中和肝素，并设法用弹簧圈尽快填塞动脉瘤腔。微导丝引起动脉瘤破裂时，尽量保持微导丝不动，微导管尽快送到瘤腔中进行填塞治疗。若微导管引起破裂而微导管头端位于瘤壁外蛛网膜下腔时，微导管且勿退入瘤腔内，应将弹簧圈经微导管送入蛛网膜下腔一部分后，再将微导管头撤入瘤腔内，继续弹簧圈填塞。若弹簧圈引起破裂，要将弹簧圈完全或部分送出去，将破裂口堵住后，调整微导管头端位置继续弹簧圈填塞。结果在接受动脉瘤栓塞治疗的153例患者中，141例曾有过动脉瘤破裂引起蛛网膜下腔出血，治疗中5例发生了术中再破裂，占动脉瘤破裂引起蛛网膜下腔出血的3．5％，总发生率为3．3％。1例破裂由导丝引起，1例由微导管引起，1例由弹簧圈过度填塞引起，弹簧圈穿孔1例，其余1例由微导管和弹簧圈共同引起。2例死亡，死亡率占术中破裂的40％，占总例数的1．3％；1例患者出院时遗留有右下肢瘫痪，其余2例患者无残留神经系统并发症。结论动脉瘤栓塞术中动脉瘤的再破裂是一少见、威胁生命但又不可避免的事件。应该立即采取妥善措施以挽救患者生命、改善预后、降低可怕并发症的发生。如处理恰当，多数术中动脉瘤破裂的患者能够存活，无后遗症。     

Surgical Treatment of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Long-Term Follow-up of 19 Patients

The prevalence of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAA) in autopsy material ranges between 2.5 and 10% of all aneurysms. Clinical findings, the distinction between inflammatory and degenerative aneurysms, and epidemiological data are uncertain, and only a few long-term follow-up studies of patients after surgical treatment of IAAAs exist. In this study, 19 patients underwent either emergency or elective surgery for IAAA during the 10-year period between 1983 and 1993 at Helsinki University Central Hospital. Demographics, symptoms, and operative and follow-up data were collected retrospectively with emphasis on the long-term outcome of IAAA. Causes of late death were available from hospital records and the central statistical office of Finland. For survival analysis we compared ruptured versus nonruptured and emergency versus elective cases of IAAAs. Mean follow-up for the 18 surviving patients (1 hospital death) was 7.4 years. One patient (5%) died of a long-term complication of the aneurysmal disease. There was no statistically significant difference in survival rates for emergency versus elective surgery cases or ruptured versus nonruptured aneurysms. The most common cause of late death was myocardial infarction. The hospital stay mortality (5%) and morbidity (31%), and the survival rate of 26% at 5 years for ruptured and 65% and 43% for nonruptured IAAAs at 5 years and 10 years, respectively, are comparable to normal AAA survival rates. These findings show that surgery is recommended, especially as ruptures also occur in this subgroup of aneurysms.     

Use of sequential B-mode ultrasonography to manage abdominal aortic aneurysms

The utility and safety of sequential B-mode ultrasonography to treat male patients with small (less than 6.0 cm in diameter) abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) were studied retrospectively in 149 consecutive patients. Sixty-three of these patients have had operative repair of the AAA. Eight-six remain unoperated on. Mean growth rate was 0.79 cm/y (1.06 cm/y in the operated-on group and 0.36 cm/y in the unoperated-on group). Seven patients sustained rupture of the AAA during follow-up and 4 patients died as a consequence of elective repair, for a combined mortality rate of 7.4% (11/149). Only one AAA that was less than 5.0 cm ruptured. This has proved to be an effective way to manage AAAs in this population.     

Ten-year outcome of patients with very small abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: The long-term fate of very small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is not well known. METHODS: Forty-one patients with asymptomatic small AAA (range 25 to 40 mm) underwent ultrasonographic surveillance. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. The median linear aneurysm expansion rate was 2.0 mm/year (range 0 to 8.4). Three patients experienced aneurysm rupture (7.3%) which resulted in 1 patient'death. Thirteen patients underwent aneurysm repair (31.7%) and 1 patient died postoperatively (7.7%). The survival rate at 10-year follow-up was 59.0%. The survival rate free from aneurysm rupture and repair at 10-year follow-up was 69.9%. The median time for occurrence of aneurysm rupture was 4.9 years (range 1.8 to 10.5) and the need for aneurysm repair was 4.5 years (range 1.4 to 10.4). CONCLUSIONS: The fate of very small AAA is to slowly enlarge in size, sometimes threatening the patient's life. These observations underline the importance of continuous surveillance and the potential benefits of any medical treatment in this patient population.     

Predictors of repair and effect of gender on treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with increased likelihood of patients undergoing surgery to repair ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Specifically, we investigated whether men were more likely than women to be selected for surgery after rupture of AAAs. METHODS: All patients with a ruptured AAA who came to a hospital in Ontario between April 1, 1992, and March 31, 2001, were included in this population-based retrospective study. Administrative data were used to identify patients, patient demographic data, and hospital variables. RESULTS: Crude 30-day mortality for the 3570 patients who came to a hospital with a ruptured AAA was 53.4%. Of the 2602 patients (72.9%) who underwent surgical repair, crude 30-day mortality was 41.0%. Older patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.649 per 5 years of age; P<.0001), with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 0.848; P<.0001), were less likely to undergo AAA repair. Patients treated at high-volume centers (OR, 2.674 per 10 cases; P<.0001) and men (OR, 2.214; P<.0001) were more likely to undergo AAA repair. CONCLUSION: Men are more likely to undergo repair of a ruptured AAA than women are, for reasons that are unclear. Given the large magnitude of the effect, further studies are clearly indicated.     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Six-year follow-up results of a multicenter prospective study

Purpose: On the basis of a prospective analysis of 147 patients undergoing surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and recorded in the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Aneurysm Registry, this study defines the early and 6-year actuarial survival rates and determines the predictive variables that are associated with survival.Methods: Ongoing follow-up of a cohort of patients was current at the time of analysis. To identify the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables that were associated with survival, statistical methods included chi-squared analysis, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression analysis.Results: The survival rate was 48.6% at 1 month, 34.7% ± 4.2% at 3 years, and 22.0% ± 4.0% at 6 years. When preoperative and intraoperative variables were considered and logistic regression analysis was used, the highest probability of early in-hospital survival was associated with preoperative creatinine levels of 1.3 mg/dl or less, intraoperative urine output of 200 ml or greater, and infrarenal clamp site. The highest probability of late survival, as calculated by the Cox proportional hazards method, was predicted by the patient's age and total urine output during the procedure. When all variables, including postoperative complications, were considered, late survival was highest if intraoperative urine output was 200 ml or greater and respiratory failure and myocardial infarction did not occur. For those patients with ruptured AAA who survived operation (i.e., greater than 1 month), the long-term survival rate was significantly lower than a comparable group undergoing repair of nonruptured AAA.Conclusions: Patients who survive repair of a ruptured AAA have a lower late survival rate than patients undergoing elective repair. When a patient is evaluated before operation, no combination of preoperative variables could identify those patients with little or no chance of survival; hence, the decision to repair a ruptured AAA should be made on clinical grounds. However, after surgery (when information on intraoperative and postoperative variables is also available), the results of this study provide a basis for the surgeon to use these prognostic variables to assist clinical judgment and guide discussions on prognosis with the family and to identify those patients who have such a low chance of early and late survival that further aggressive treatment may be futile. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:888-900.)     

Combined thoracic aortic dissection and abdominal aortic fusiform aneurysm.

Certain clinical and autopsy findings are described in 13 patients who had both aortic dissection (AD) and fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). All 13 patients had severe and extensive aortic atherosclerosis. The AAA was diagnosed clinically in 9 patients, and 5 had the AAA resected. The AD was diagnosed clinically in 5 patients, and 2 underwent attempted operative repair. Two patients who had the AAA resected because of suspected rupture were found later to have ruptured a more proximal AD. Thus, AD occurs occasionally in patients who have AAA. In older persons with suspected rupture of an AAA, a more proximal rupture of an AD should be ruled out. When both AAA and AD are present in the same patient, the AD is more likely the cause of cardiovascular collapse than is rupture of the AAA.     

Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: concurrent comparison of outcome of those occurring after endovascular repair versus those occurring without previous treatment in an 11-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this single-center study was to compare findings at presentation and surgical outcome in patients in whom abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) ruptured after endovascular repair and patients in whom AAAs ruptured before any treatment, over a defined period. METHODS: From May 1992 to September 2003, 1043 patients underwent elective repair of intact infrarenal AAAs. Endovascular repair was performed in 609 patients, and open repair in 434 patients. Eighteen of 609 patients (3%) who underwent endovascular AAA repair required treatment because of rupture of the aneurysm after a mean of 29 months (group 1). During the same 11-year period, another 91 patients without previous treatment required urgent repair of a ruptured AAA (group 2). Rupture was diagnosed at contrast material-enhanced computed tomography or by presence of extramural extravasation of blood at open repair. Except for a higher incidence of women in group 2, patients in both groups were similar with regard to demographics and clinical characteristics but differed in findings at presentation. Eight patients in group 1 had a known endoleak before AAA rupture, whereas contrast-enhanced computed tomography, performed in 15 patients at presentation, demonstrated an endoleak in all. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg) was noted at presentation in 4 of 18 patients (22%) in group 1 and 76 of 91 patients (84%) in group 2. All patients underwent open repair via a transperitoneal approach, except for 4 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 who underwent endovascular repair of ruptured AAAs. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with hypotension at presentation in group 1 (4 of 18) was significantly less than in group 2 (76 of 91; P < .01). The difference in perioperative (30 day) mortality rate in group 1 (3 of 18; 16.6%) compared with group 2 (49 of 91; 53.8%) was also significant (P < .01). The outcome in group 1 was therefore superior to that in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that endovascular AAA repair complicated by endoleak does not prevent rupture. The data suggest, however, that rupture, when it occurs in these circumstances, may not be accompanied by such major hemodynamic changes and high mortality as rupture of an untreated AAA. Further long-term follow-up and analysis in a larger group of patients are required to confirm the apparent intermediate level of protection afforded by failed endovascular repair, which does not prevent rupture but enhances survival after operation to treat rupture, possibly by ameliorating the hemodynamic changes associated with the rupture process.     

Four-year follow up of patients with untreated abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: The data in the literature are still controversial describing the outcome of patients not treated for a large abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) especially with significant comorbidities. We followed up patients trying to establish their long-term outcome. METHOD: Since 1998, we have prospectively followed all patients referred to our department with AAA. A retrospective analysis was carried out selecting all patients who had an AAA larger than 5 cm, and who declined or were declined for operative repair between February 1998 and November 2001. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients were included in the present study. There were 78 men and 33 women. The mean age was 80 years. At the end of the study, 65 patients (59%) were deceased. Ruptured aneurysm occurred in 27 patients (median time to rupture = 14 months) with one patient surviving an emergency repair. Thirty-nine patients died from unrelated illnesses. In the 5-5.9 cm AAA group (n = 58), out of 31 deceased patients, five (16%) have died of ruptured AAA. In the 6 cm and larger AAA group (n = 53), out of 34 deceased patients, 21 (62%) have died of ruptured AAA. There was no significant difference in survival between patients with AAA below and above 6 cm in diameter (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: In the presence of significant comorbidities, most patients with AAA less than 6 cm died from unrelated illnesses. In the larger AAA group, the likelihood of death from AAA rupture or unrelated illnesses is almost equal.     

Contemporary results of open repair of ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms: effect of surgeon volume on mortality

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate contemporary results of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms (RAAA) and identify the role of surgeons' annual aortic volume and other prognostic indicators for early outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 213 consecutive patients who presented with an atherosclerotic RAAA without thoracic extension over 6.5 years ending in June 2007. Excluded were 31 ruptures treated by endovascular repair (EVAR) or following previous EVAR, also excluded were two chronic asymptomatic hemodynamically stable ruptures. Ten patients were not treated due to either patient's refusal or prohibitive surgical risk. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. Log rank test and Cox proportional hazard model analyses were utilized to identify factors contributing to mortality and morbidity in these patients. Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one males and 39 females with a mean age of 74.5 +/- 8.1 years underwent consecutive RAAA repairs. The operative mortality rate was 38.2% (65/170), including 29 intraoperative deaths. Using multivariate analysis, surgeon's average annual AAA volume (<20/y), advanced age, and postoperative intestinal ischemia were independent predictors of perioperative deaths. Shock on presentation, preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation or free rupture were not. High-volume surgeons (>20 average annual AAA cases/y) had a higher 30-day survival rates (78.4% vs 57.9%, P = .024). Octogenarians had a lower 30-day survival rate of 49.0% vs 70.5% (P = .012). Patients who developed postoperative intestinal ischemia had a lower 30-day survival rate compared with patients without (48.1% vs 15.3%, P = .002). Increased intraoperative fluid and blood product usage was associated with bowel ischemia (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: RAAA remains a highly lethal problem. The improved early outcomes of surgeons with high-volume AAA have strong implications for training, emergency staffing needs and alternative treatment strategies.