Effects of ritonavir on indinavir pharmacokinetics in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma

Therapeutic control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in peripheral compartments does not assure control in the central nervous system. Inadequate drug penetration may provide a sanctuary from which resistant virus can emerge or allow development of psychomotor abnormalities. To characterize the effect of ritonavir on indinavir disposition into cerebrospinal fluid, seven HIV-infected adults underwent intensive sampling at steady-state while receiving twice-daily indinavir (800 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg). Serial cerebrospinal fluid and plasma samples were obtained at 10 time points from each subject. Free indinavir accounted for 98.6% of drug in cerebrospinal fluid and 55.9% in plasma. Mean cerebrospinal fluid C(max), C(min), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) values for free indinavir were 735 nM, 280 nM, and 6502 nM h(-1), respectively, and the free levels exceeded 100 nM in every sample. The cerebrospinal fluid/plasma AUC(0-12) ratio for free indinavir was 17.5% +/- 6.4%. This ratio was remarkably similar to results obtained in a previous study in which subjects received indinavir without ritonavir, indicating that ritonavir did not have a substantial direct effect on the barrier to indinavir penetration into cerebrospinal fluid. Low-dose ritonavir increases cerebrospinal fluid indinavir concentrations substantially more than 800 mg of indinavir given thrice daily without concomitant ritonavir, despite a lower total daily indinavir dose.     

The steady-state disposition of indinavir is not altered by the concomitant administration of clarithromycin

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and potential pharmacokinetic interaction between indinavir and clarithromycin. STUDY METHODS: In a randomized, three-period, crossover fashion, 12 healthy adults received the following for 1 week: 800 mg oral indinavir sulfate every 8 hours with placebo, 500 mg oral clarithromycin every 12 hours with placebo, and indinavir sulfate with clarithromycin. Plasma indinavir, clarithromycin, and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin concentrations were determined after the last dose in each treatment period. RESULTS: Administration of indinavir sulfate with clarithromycin caused a statistically significant increase in four pharmacokinetic parameters: a 58% increase in plasma indinavir concentrations at 8 hours (P = .029), a 47% increase in values for clarithromycin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last measured concentration [AUC(0-12h); P = .0002], and 49% and 48% decreases in 14-hydroxyclarithromycin AUC(0-12h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values, respectively (P = .0001 and P = .0001). These effects are not considered to be clinically significant in view of the insignificant effects on the values for indinavir area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last measured concentration [AUC(0-8h)] and Cmax, as well as the safety profile of clarithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of indinavir sulfate and clarithromycin is generally well tolerated and can be coadministered without dose adjustment.     

Changes in indinavir exposure over time: a case study in six HIV-1-infected children

OBJECTIVE: To study changes in indinavir exposure over time in HIV-1-infected children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protease inhibitor (PI)-naive HIV-1-infected children were treated with indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine. Steady-state plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was carried out as standard of care. The AUC(0-8) was targeted between 15 and 30 mg h/L. PK sampling was repeated after dosage adjustment until the AUC(0-8) reached target values. Patients were included when the time interval between PK samplings was > or =2 years and differences in dosage/m2 <10% between PK samplings 1 and 2. Corrections of dose for changes in body size were carried out. RESULTS: Six children were enrolled with a median age of 5.2 years (range 1.7-13.6 years). All had a viral load below 500 copies/mL. The geometric mean (GM) of the AUC(0-8) decreased from 25.3 mg h/L at the first PK-day to 19.1 mg h/L at the second PK-day [geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.76 (95% C.I.: 0.48-1.20)]. The GM of Cmax decreased from 11.8 to 10.4 mg/L [GMR: 0.88 (95% C.I.: 0.59-1.32)]. The GM of Cmin decreased from 0.08 to 0.07 mg/L [GMR: 0.86 (95% C.I.: 0.62-1.18)]. All children had an AUC(0-8) above 15 mg h/L on the first PK-day; three had an AUC(0-8) below 15 mg h/L on the second PK-day. In two of these three children, the plasma viral load was >500 copies/mL. CONCLUSION: Changes in indinavir exposure were observed over time. In two patients, decreased indinavir exposure was associated with virological failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be carried out over time since this may prevent subtherapeutic dosing in children.     

Entry of tromethamine into the cerebrospinal fluid of humans after cerebrovascular events.

OBJECTIVE: The intravenous administration of tromethamine (INN, trometamol) lowers the intracranial pressure in patients with brain edema. One postulated mechanism of action is the increase of the pH of the cerebrospinal fluid. METHODS: To study tromethamine kinetics in serum and cerebrospinal fluid, nine patients with external ventriculostomies and normal serum creatinine values received 60 mmol intravenous tromethamine (Tris 36.34%, pH 11) over 30 minutes. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid were drawn repeatedly, and concentrations were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) ranged from 211 to 426 mg/L (median, 302 mg/L). The volume of distribution was 0.34 to 0.86 L/kg body weight (median, 0.53 L/kg), and the elimination half-life in serum (t1/2beta) 3.22 to 8.44 hours (median, 4.53 hours). Cerebrospinal fluid Cmax values ranging from 0.68 to 34.14 mg/L (median, 3.88 mg/L) were observed 1 to 12 hours after the end of the tromethamine infusion (median, 2 hours). AUC(CSF)/AUC(S) as a measure of overall cerebrospinal fluid penetration was 0.015 to 0.46 (median, 0.068). Cerebrospinal fluid Cmax and AUC(CSF)/AUC(S) depended on the function of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. Cerebrospinal fluid t1/2 (8.52 to 14.2 hours; median, 11.2 hours) was substantially longer than the t1/2beta in serum. In vitro, cerebrospinal fluid concentrations < or =30 mg/L did not influence cerebrospinal fluid pH. CONCLUSION: Tromethamine cerebrospinal fluid concentrations will be high enough to increase the pH of the cerebrospinal fluid only at large doses and in patients with a pronounced disruption of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier.     

Pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with brain lymphoma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and intra-arterial administration compared with intravenous or simple intra-arterial infusion in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. METHODS: Serum and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid were sampled after methotrexate administration in 12 patients. Blood-brain barrier disruption was induced on 2 sequential days by mannitol (25%) infusion delivered to the vertebral or internal carotid artery territories followed by intra-arterial methotrexate (dose, 1.4 g/m2; 47 treatments). Sixteen treatments were given without barrier disruption by intravenous (3.5 g/m2; nine treatments) or intra-arterial (2.8 g/m2; seven treatments) infusion. RESULTS: Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid-methotrexate peak levels after blood-brain barrier disruption of the vertebral and the internal carotid arteries territories were 19.3 +/- 2.9 and 8.5 +/- 0.7 micromol/L (P < .001), and the area under the curve from time 0 to infinity was 178.0 +/- 21.3 and 110.0 +/- 12.4 [micromol/L x h, respectively (P < .01). No significant differences were observed in serum levels. After intra-arterial infusion was performed without disruption, the serum peak level was higher than that achieved by intravenous treatment (518.2 +/- 67.7 versus 180.6 +/- 31.8 micromol/L; P < .001). No differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which dropped below 1 micromol/L at 6 hours. The cerebrospinal fluid/serum ratio [AUC(%)] of methotrexate after blood-brain barrier disruption was three to four times greater than that by systemic administration. CONCLUSION: Enhanced methotrexate delivery to the central nervous system can be attained by intra-arterial administration combined with osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier compared with simple intra-arterial or intravenous administration.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indinavir with or without low-dose ritonavir in HIV-infected Thai patients

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indinavir with or without low-dose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected Thai patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six HIV-1-infected patients who participated in HIV-NAT 005 study gave informed consent to record a pharmacokinetic curve 4 weeks after starting a regimen containing either indinavir 800 mg every 8 h (n = 19) or indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h (n = 17). Indinavir plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range; IQR) body weight of the 36 patients (11 females and 25 males) was 60 (54-72) kg. Median and IQR values for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 20.9 (13.1-27.0) mg x h/L, 8.1 (6.6-9.4) mg/L and 0.13 (0.09-0.27) mg/L, respectively, for indinavir 800 mg every 8 h, and 49.2 (42.5-60.4) mg x h/L, 10.6 (8.5-13.2) mg/L and 0.68 (0.43-0.77) mg/L, respectively, for indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h. These values are not largely different from values found in Caucasian patients, with the exception of relatively high peak levels of indinavir in Thai subjects. Cut-off values for optimal virological efficacy were an indinavir Cmin of 0.10 and 0.25 mg/L for the every 8 h and the every 12 h regimen, respectively; patients with an indinavir AUC greater than 30 (every 8 h regimen) or 60 (every 12 h regimen) mg x h/L were at increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Thai HIV-1-infected patients are similar to those described in Caucasian patients, despite an overall lower body weight in this population     

Indinavir pharmacokinetics and parmacodynamics in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

The indinavir dosage regimen currently used for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children is not based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in the target patient population. The purpose of our study was to characterize indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in HIV-infected children. Eleven children (age range, 9.0 to 13.6 years; weight range, 21.7 to 56.0 kg) receiving indinavir (500 mg/m(2) every 8 h) in combination with lamivudine and stavudine were studied. The correlation of indinavir pharmacokinetic parameters and demographic parameters was evaluated. Also, the pharmacodynamic relationship between parameters of indinavir exposure and parameters of renal toxicity and immunologic recovery was studied. The area under the indinavir concentration-time curve (AUC) and patient body surface area (BSA) showed a significant negative correlation (r = 0.73; P = 0.012). Patients with smaller BSA had excessive indinavir AUC compared to adults. On the other hand, the median minimum drug concentration in plasma (C(min)) was lower than that reported for adults. The maximum indinavir concentration in serum was higher in patients with renal toxicity (5 out of 11 children), but the difference was not statistically significant (15.3 +/- 8.2 versus 9.8 +/- 4.4 mg/liter; P = 0.19). There was a trend toward higher immunologic efficacy in patients with greater indinavir exposure: the time-averaged AUC of the percentage of CD4(+) lymphocytes over the baseline value for patients with indinavir C(min) > 95% inhibitory concentration (IC(95)) was higher than in patients with C(min) < IC(95) (P = 0. 068). Our study suggests that a dose reduction may be appropriate for children with small BSA and that a 6-h dosage regimen may be indicated for a substantial percentage of patients. Due to the low number of patients enrolled in this study, our results should be confirmed by a larger study.     

Indinavir population pharmacokinetics in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. The HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indinavir concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The median concentration in plasma exceeded that in CSF 10-fold. The modeled CSF curve was flat at 155 nM, and the estimated ratio of the areas under the CSF and plasma concentration-time curves was 6%. We conclude that CSF indinavir concentrations are lower than levels in plasma but exceed the clinical 95% inhibitory concentration range.     

The influence of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of a twice-daily combination of indinavir and low-dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of multiple-dose efavirenz on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the combination of indinavir (800 mg) and low-dose ritonavir (100 mg) twice a day, in which ritonavir is used to increase indinavir plasma concentrations. METHODS: Eighteen healthy male volunteers participated in this multiple-dose, 1-arm, 2-period interaction study. They took a combination of 800 mg indinavir and 100 mg ritonavir with food for 15 days. From days 15 to 29, a once-daily administration of 600 mg efavirenz was added to the combination. Pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir on days 15 and 29 were compared. RESULTS: Fourteen volunteers completed the study. The addition of efavirenz resulted in significant reductions (P <.01) in indinavir area under the curve (AUC, -25%), trough concentration (C(min), -50%), and maximum concentration (C(max), -17%). All indinavir C(min) levels on day 29 remained equivalent to or above the mean C(min) value described for the regimen of 800 mg indinavir three times a day, without ritonavir (0.15 mg/L). Changes in ritonavir AUC, C(min), and C(max) were -36%, -39%, and -34%, respectively. Pharmacokinetics of efavirenz on day 29 were comparable with published data. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of efavirenz to a combination of 800 mg indinavir and 100 mg ritonavir twice daily results in significant decreases in AUC, C(max), and especially C(min) of indinavir. The dose of indinavir or ritonavir should be increased to maintain similar indinavir drug levels after addition of efavirenz to the indinavir-ritonavir combination. Dose modifications may not be needed in antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients if the reference C(min) of the regimen of 800 mg indinavir 3 times a day is considered to be adequate.     

Pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitor indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children as part of a prospective, open, uncontrolled, multicenter study in The Netherlands. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children were monitored over 6 months of treatment with zidovudine (120 mg/m(2) every 8 h [q8h]), lamivudine (4 mg/kg of body weight q12h), and indinavir (33mg/kg of metabolic weight [MW] q8h). Four weeks after the start of treatment, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. If patients had an indinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of below 10 or above 30 mg/liter. h, a dose increase or a dose reduction was made and pharmacokinetic measurements were repeated 4 weeks later. Nineteen patients started with the dose of 33 mg/kg of MW q8h. The median AUC (range) was 10.5 (2.8 to 51.0) mg/liter. h. The median AUC (range) in 17 children treated with 50 mg/kg of MW q8h was 20.6 (4.1 to 38.7) mg/liter. h. Finally, five patients had a dose increase to 67 mg/kg of MW q8h, resulting in a median AUC (range) of 36.6 (27.2 to 80.0) mg/liter. h. After 6 months of treatment, there were 11 children with an AUC of below 20 mg/liter. h, of whom 5 (45%) had a detectable viral load, while this was the case in none of the 11 children with an AUC of higher than 20 mg/liter. h. We conclude that the optimal dose of indinavir in children to obtain drug exposure similar to that observed in adult patients is 50 mg/kg of MW q8h, which approximates 600 mg/m(2) q8h. It would even be better to adjust the indinavir dose based on an AUC of greater than 20 mg/liter. h.     

Relevance of soft-tissue penetration by levofloxacin for target site bacterial killing in patients with sepsis

Antimicrobial therapy of soft tissue infections in patients with sepsis sometimes lacks efficiency, despite the documented susceptibility of the causative pathogen to the administered antibiotic. In this context, impaired equilibration between the antibiotic concentrations in plasma and those in tissues in critically ill patients has been discussed. To characterize the impact of tissue penetration of anti-infective agents on antimicrobial killing, we used microdialysis to measure the concentration-versus-time profiles of levofloxacin in the interstitial space fluid of skeletal muscle in patients with sepsis. Subsequently, we applied an established dynamic in vivo pharmacokinetic-in vitro pharmacodynamic approach to simulate bacterial killing at the site of infection. The population mean areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) for levofloxacin showed that levofloxacin excellently penetrates soft tissues, as indicated by the ratio of the AUC from time zero to 8 h (AUC(0-8)) for muscle tissue (AUC(0-8 muscle)) to the AUC(0-8) for free drug in plasma (AUC(0-8 plasma free)) (AUC(0-8 muscle)/AUC(0-8 plasma free) ratio) of 0.85. The individual values of tissue penetration and maximum concentration (C(max)) in muscle tissue were highly variable. No difference in bacterial killing of a select Staphylococcus aureus strain for which the MIC was 0.5 microg/ml was found between individuals after exposure to dynamically changing concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and tissue in vitro. In contrast, the decrease in the bacterial counts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC = 2 microg/ml) varied extensively when the bacteria were exposed to levofloxacin at the concentrations determined from the individual concentration-versus-time profiles obtained in skeletal muscle. The extent of bacterial killing could be predicted by calculating individual C(max)/MIC and AUC(0-8 muscle)/AUC(0-8 plasma free) ratios (R = 0.96 and 0.93, respectively). We have therefore shown in the present study that individual differences in the tissue penetration of levofloxacin may markedly affect target site killing of bacteria for which MICs are close to 2 microg/ml.     

Low plasma concentrations of indinavir are related to virological treatment failure in HIV-1-infected patients on indinavir-containing triple therapy

All human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients who started to use indinavir (800 mg three times a day) as part of their triple drug regimen were included in a study to determine the importance of low plasma concentrations of indinavir as a cause of virological treatment failure. The indinavir concentration and a number of patient characteristics at baseline were tested as risk factors for virological treatment failure (defined as a viral load above 200 copies/ml after 24 weeks of treatment) in univariate and multivariate analyses; 65 patients were included. Virological treatment failure occurred in 36.9% of the patients. Multivariate analysis showed that a low plasma concentration of indinavir (odds ratio 0.1), a high viral load at baseline (odds ratio 2.6) and pretreatment with another protease inhibitor (odds ratio 10.0) were independent factors related to virological treatment failure. Monitoring of indinavir plasma concentrations may be an important tool for the optimization of triple drug combination therapy.     

The pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and M8 during pregnancy and post partum

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite hydroxy-t-butylamidenelfinavir (M8) during pregnancy and post partum. METHODS: Eleven human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected pregnant women receiving 1250 mg nelfinavir twice daily were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and M8 were assessed over a 12-hour period during pregnancy (median, 32 weeks' gestation; range, 31-36 weeks) and post partum (median, 8 weeks post partum; range, 6-15 weeks). Drug concentrations were analyzed by HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectroscopy, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by use of noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: The median area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC 0-12), the maximal plasma concentration (C max), and the concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C 12) for nelfinavir post partum were 33.5 h . microg/mL, 5.80 microg/mL, and 1.40 microg/mL, respectively. The values for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) (third trimester/post partum) for the nelfinavir AUC 0-12 , C max , and C 12 were 0.76 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.06), 0.81 (90% CI, 0.57-1.15), and 0.43 (90% CI, 0.25-0.76), respectively. The GMR values for the M8 AUC 0-12 , C max , and C 12 were 0.32 (90% CI, 0.18-0.55), 0.31 (90% CI, 0.19-0.51), and 0.30 (90% CI, 0.14-0.64), respectively. The median ratio values of the AUC 0-12 of M8 and nelfinavir (M8/nelfinavir) during the third trimester and post partum were 11% and 27%, respectively (GMR, 0.42 [90% CI, 0.33-0.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Nelfinavir exposure was reduced during pregnancy, and the reduction was statistically significant for C 12 . M8 concentrations were about 70% lower during pregnancy compared with post partum, suggesting either induction of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 or inhibition of CYP2C19, or both, during pregnancy. Because 8 of 11 women had subtherapeutic nelfinavir trough concentrations during pregnancy, the safety and efficacy of therapeutic drug monitoring should be investigated.     

Penetration of foscarnet into cerebrospinal fluid of AIDS patients.

The diffusion of foscarnet into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was studied in 27 patients with AIDS. Foscarnet was administered intravenously at various dosages at 12-h intervals. Concentrations in plasma and CSF at the end of foscarnet infusion or 1, 3, 5, 6, and 12 h after infusion were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Thirty-seven samples were obtained. The median concentration of foscarnet in CSF was 80 mumol/liter (range, 0 to 500 mumol/liter). The CSF foscarnet concentration was greater than the 50% inhibitory concentration for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and was equal to or greater than the 50% inhibitory concentration for cytomegalovirus in most cases. The penetration of foscarnet into CSF, as expressed by the ratio of the concentration in CSF to the simultaneous concentration in plasma, ranged from 0 to 3.4 (median, 0.27) and was highly correlated with the presence of cells within CSF and the length of foscarnet therapy. Good diffusion of foscarnet in CSF allows evaluation of this drug in central nervous system cytomegalovirus and human immunodeficiency virus infections in patients with AIDS.     

Pharmacodynamic profiling of cefepime in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of hospitalized patients with external ventriculostomies

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) were used to describe the pharmacodynamic profile of cefepime in the both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Plasma and CSF cefepime data were obtained from a PK study of 7 hospitalized patients with external ventricular drains. Concentration-time profiles in plasma and CSF were modeled using a 3-compartment model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination and transfer. Estimates of the PK parameters were identified in the Big Non Parametric Adaptive Grid with adaptive gamma (BigNPAG) program of Leary, Jelliffe, Schumitzky, and Van Guilder. MCS (10,000 subjects) was performed to estimate the probability of attaining the targets of free plasma concentration (20% protein binding) and total drug CSF concentration of 50-100% T>minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for MICs 0.06-8 mg/L for cefepime 2 g, iv, every 8 h (0.5-h infusion); cefepime 2 g, iv, every 12 h (0.5-h infusion); and cefepime 2 g (0.5-h infusion) once and 250 mg/h continuous infusion. After the Bayesian step, the observed-predicted regression and r(2) for plasma and CNS were as follows: plasma, observed=0.984 x predicted+2.570, r(2)=0.944; CSF, observed=0.785 x predicted+0.868, r(2)=0.821. The median penetration of cefepime as measured by AUC(CSF)/AUC(plasma) was 7.8%. In the MCS, the target attainment rates in plasma for 60-70% fT>MIC were high at each MIC value between 0.03 and 8 microg/mL for each regimen examined. In CSF, none of the regimens achieved 50-100% T>MIC for>80% of patients for MICs>0.5 mg/L.     

Cerebrospinal fluid penetration and pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in an experimental rabbit meningitis model

This study was designed to investigate the penetration across the blood-brain barrier of three doses of levofloxacin using a microdialysis probe implanted into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a rabbit pneumococcal meningitis model. The microdialysis guide cannula was implanted into rabbit subarachnoid space using a stereotaxic frame. After 3 days, 10(4) cfu Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 3 in 0.3 mL saline was injected via intracisternal puncture and animals were allowed to incubate the organisms for 16-18 h. Groups of animals (n = 5) then received 7, 10.5 or 14 mg/kg iv of the drug over 10 min. Plasma samples were obtained via an ear vein 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after the antibiotic infusion. CSF microdialysis effluent samples were collected every 0.5 h for the entire experiment. Plasma and microdialysis effluent samples were analysed by HPLC. AUC(0-8) in plasma and CSF were computed using the trapezoid rule. The elimination half-life in plasma and CSF was calculated using non-linear regression analysis. The unbound peak plasma concentrations for the three doses studied were 3.9, 6.4 and 10.3 mg/L, respectively. There was a significant increase in the plasma AUC(0-8) [29.7 +/- 6.3, 49.1 +/- 19.1 and 67.6 +/- 8.9 mg x h/L (P < 0.005)]. The unbound peak CSF concentrations were 3.8, 5.7 and 8.6 mg/L and occurred at 0-0.5 h after the administration of the dose. The AUC(CSF(0-8)) was significantly higher as the dose was increased (7 mg/kg, 15.8 +/- 6.6; 10.5 mg/kg, 37.3 +/- 7.8; and 14 mg/kg, 46.4 +/- 20.9 mg x h/L; P < 0.03). The penetration of levofloxacin averaged 53% for the 7 mg/kg dosage group, 76% for the 10.5 mg/kg group and 68% for the 14 mg/kg group. Our results demonstrate that levofloxacin penetration into the CSF averages 66% for the doses that would be used in clinical practice.     

Pharmacokinetic Study of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors Used in Combination with Amprenavir

In an open-label, randomized, multicenter, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study, we determined the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir with and without coadministration of indinavir, nelfinavir, or saquinavir soft gel formulation in 31 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects. The results indicated that amprenavir plasma concentrations were decreased by saquinavir soft gel capsule (by 32% for area under the concentration-time curve at steady state [AUC(ss)] and 37% for peak plasma concentration at steady state [C(max,ss)]) and increased by indinavir (33% for AUC(ss)). Nelfinavir significantly increased amprenavir minimum drug concentration at steady state (by 189%) but did not affect amprenavir AUC(ss) or C(max,ss). Nelfinavir and saquinavir steady-state pharmacokinetics were unchanged by coadministration with amprenavir compared with the historical monotherapy data. Concentrations of indinavir, coadministered with amprenavir, in plasma decreased in both single-dose and steady-state evaluations. The changes in amprenavir steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters, relative to those for amprenavir alone, were not consistent among protease inhibitors, nor were the changes consistent with potential interactions in CYP3A4 metabolism or P-glycoprotein transport. No dose adjustment of either protease inhibitor in any of the combinations studied is needed.