Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Implantable defibrillators have become the dominant therapeutic modality for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Current defibrillators are small (<60 mL) and implanted with techniques similar to standard pacemakers. They provide high-energy shocks for ventricular fibrillation and rapid ventricular tachycardia, antitachycardia pacing for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, as well as antibradycardia pacing. Newer devices incorporating an atrial lead allow dual-chamber pacing and better discrimination between ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Randomized controlled trials have shown superior survival with implantable defibrillators than with antiarrhythmic drugs in survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. Complications associated with implantable defibrillator therapy include infection, lead failure, and spurious shocks for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Most patients adapt well to living with an implantable defibrillator, although driving often has to be restricted. Limited evidence suggests that implantable defibrillator therapy is cost-effective when compared with other widely accepted treatments. The use of implantable defibrillators is likely to continue to expand in the future. Ongoing clinical trials will define further prophylactic indications of the implantable defibrillator and clarify its cost-effectiveness ratio in different clinical settings.     

First worldwide clinical experience with a new dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Advantages and complications. The Ventak AV II DR investigators.

AIMS: The need for physiological pacing and for improving the ability to discriminate atrial from ventricular tachyarrhythmias has prompted the development of dual chamber implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: Fifty-two patients were implanted with a newly developed dual-chamber ICD providing rate-responsive physiological pacing (Ventak AV II DR). The device possesses two new arrhythmia detection algorithms ('atrial fibrillation rate threshold' and 'ventricular to atrial rate relationship') in addition to commonly used features such as 'onset' and 'stability'. During implantation, the atrial and ventricular lead impedances and pacing thresholds were determined together with the defibrillation threshold. Prior to discharge, attempts were made to induce both atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in order to test those new detection criteria. All patients were followed for at least 3 months. RESULTS: The device was successfully implanted in all 52 patients. Placement of the atrial lead was successful in 50/52 patients (96%; P-wave 3.2 +/- 1.4 mV; impedance 576 +/- 123 omega; atrial pacing threshold 1.2 +/- 0.9 V). Prior to discharge, 32 episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) alone, 38 episodes of AF with ventricular fibrillation and 10 episodes of AF with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were induced in 33/50 patients (66%) and all were appropriately classified by the detection algorithm. During the 3 months follow-up, 12 patients (23%) had appropriate and successful therapies for ventricular arrhythmias, while four patients (8%) experienced inappropriate ICD therapies. Although all these episodes were detected correctly as supraventricular arrhythmias by the device, therapy was delivered because of incorrect or incomplete programming. In all cases reprogramming of the device resolved the problem. CONCLUSION: Implantation of dual chamber ICDs is feasible and appears to improve discrimination of supraventricular from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In addition, patients with tachyarrhythmias and concomitant bradyarrhythmias may benefit from simultaneous physiological pacing. However, implantation and follow-up of such patients should be performed at experienced centres since both surgical handling and programming of these devices is more difficult and complex than conventional ICDs.     

Worldwide clinical experience with a new dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator system

INTRODUCTION: Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias represents a significant challenge in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Drug therapy of these arrhythmias is limited by moderate efficacy, ventricular proarrhythmia, and drug-device interactions. This study tested the safety and efficacy of a new dual-chamber ICD to detect and treat atrial as well as ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: A dual-chamber ICD (Medtronic 7250 Jewel AF) was implanted in 293 of 303 patients at 49 centers in Europe, Canada, and North America. Specific data were collected at implant and during a mean follow-up period of 7.9+/-4.7 months. There were no clinically evident failures to detect and treat ventricular arrhythmias. In patients with at least one of the dual-chamber detection criteria activated, 1,056 of 1,192 episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation detected were judged to be appropriate (89% positive predictive accuracy). Therapy efficacy was 100% in the ventricular fibrillation zone and 98% in the ventricular tachycardia zone. Positive predictive accuracy for detection of atrial episodes was 95% (1,052/1,107). For episodes classified as atrial tachycardia by the device, the efficacy of atrial antitachycardia pacing and high-frequency (50-Hz) burst pacing was 55% and 17%, respectively. High-frequency burst pacing terminated 16.8% of episodes classified as atrial fibrillation, and atrial defibrillation had an estimated efficacy of 76%. The actuarial estimates of 6-month complication-free survival and total survival were 88% and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This novel dual-chamber ICD is capable of safely and effectively discriminating atrial from ventricular tachyarrhythmias and of treating atrial tachyarrhythmias without compromising detection and treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Clinical experience with tiered atrial therapies and atrial arrhythmia prevention algorithms in a dual chamber cardioverter defibrillator

INTRODUCTION: The acceptance of atrial arrhythmia features in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) will depend on their ability to appropriately discriminate atrial tachyarrhythmias/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF). This study tested the effectiveness of an atrial/ventricular ICD with advanced atrial detection and new algorithms designed to prevent atrial arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were implanted with a dual chamber ICD (Model 1900, Guidant Corporation, MN, USA) at 25 US centers. Ten patients received a coronary sinus (CS) lead allowing a defibrillation vector for AT/AF cardioversion. Follow-up was 12.2 months. The addition of new atrial features designed for detection, discrimination, and prevention of AT/AF had no adverse effect upon detection of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) (mean detection time with new features ON was 2.22 seconds vs 2.19 seconds with features OFF). A total of 100% of the induced and spontaneous ventricular and atrial arrhythmias receiving shock therapy were reviewed as appropriate detection. Atrial shock conversion efficacy for spontaneous and induced AT/AF episodes was 83% and 96%, respectively (144 spontaneous, 162 induced episodes). A 3-month randomized crossover trial of atrial preventative pacing features did not result in adverse effects, but there was no clinical efficacy for prevention of AT/AF. CONCLUSION: Enhanced atrial detection and discrimination features combined with tiered atrial therapies did not adversely impact the ability of the ICD (Model 1900) to appropriately detect and treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

AIMS: To investigate the susceptibility of implantable cardioverter defibrillators to electromagnetic interference generated by digital cellular telephones, functioning in both international transmission technologies: the Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) and the Digital Cellular System (DCS 1800). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 36 patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators from two manufacturers (Medtronic and Guidant/CPI), cellular telephones with different levels of minimal and maximal power output were tested in the transmitting and receiving mode. Evaluation was performed in activated implantable defibrillators during spontaneous cardiac activity and continuous VVI or DDD pacing to assess possible electromagnetic interference. In two patients, appropriateness of ventricular fibrillation detection and therapy was judged during telephone testing. There was no damage, reprogramming, inappropriate shock therapy or pacing inhibition during the tests. In seven pre-pectoral Medtronic implantable defibrillators, transient electromagnetic interference caused 19 erroneous sensing events, when the operating phone was held in close vicinity to the programmer head. These 'pseudo-oversensing' events, which did not result in logging of arrhythmia episodes in the device counter, were interpreted as an adverse interaction between the telephone and the programming device. CONCLUSION: Digital cellular telephones do not represent a risk to Medtronic and Guidant/CPI recipients of the specific implantable defibrillator models herein tested.     

Chronic kidney disease and sudden death: strategies for prevention

The association between chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular death is accounted for, in part, by higher rates of serious arrhythmias. Research shows an independent relationship between worsened renal function and atrial fibrillation, heart block, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and asystole. These higher rates also associate with underlying structural heart disease including left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, valvular disease, and left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. In addition, chronic intermittent ischemia is implicated in the arrhythmias observed during hemodialysis. The superimposed conditions of acidosis and fluxes in both potassium and magnesium also contribute to higher rates of arrhythmias. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate is linked to worsened outcomes and increased defibrillation thresholds in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Preventive strategies include meticulous management of electrolytes, baseline treatment for cardiovascular disease, and when indicated, implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Future research into the mechanisms and prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic kidney disease is warranted.     

Efficacy of a tiered therapy defibrillator system used to treat recurrent ventricular arrhythmias refractory to drugs.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate an implantable tiered therapy defibrillator system that delivered antitachycardia pacing treatment for slower well tolerated ventricular tachycardias and cardioversion or defibrillation for fast tachycardias or ventricular fibrillation. METHODS--A tiered treatment device (Ventritex Cadence V-100) was implanted in 30 patients with ventricular tachycardia that was refractory to drugs. Efficacy was evaluated by the responses of induced or spontaneous arrhythmias to the treatments delivered. RESULTS--Antitachycardia pacing successfully terminated 80% of episodes of ventricular tachycardia induced by non-invasive programmed stimulation, but acceleration was brought about by pacing in six patients in 10% of episodes. During a follow up of two to 17 (mean seven) months, 18 patients (60%) had recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. Antitachycardia pacing terminated ventricular tachycardia in 17 of 18 patients in 87% of episodes. Twelve patients received shocks for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Failure of pacing, with subsequent cardioversion, occurred in nine patients (50%) in one or more episodes. Acceleration of tachycardia by pacing occurred in 10 patients in 5% of episodes. Only two of these patients had experienced acceleration of previously induced arrhythmia. Five patients had spontaneous fast ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation treated by cardioversion or defibrillation. Spurious treatment was delivered in nine patients (30%), during atrial fibrillation in five, sinus tachycardia in two, and because of fracture of the sensing lead system in two patients. The retrieval of stored intracardiac electrograms was of clinical value in assessing spurious treatment. CONCLUSIONS--Tiered treatment was effective in terminating recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in these selected patients. Most episodes were treated successfully by pacing, and resistant tachycardias, pacing induced acceleration, or haemodynamically compromising arrhythmias were treated by shocks.     

Inappropriate Shocks from Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators Caused by Sensing of Diaphragmatic Myopotentials

Inappropriate shocks remain one of the major problems associated with the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). We describe 3 patients who had inappropriate shocks due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials. In all 3, oversensing could be demonstrated during deep inspiration or Valsalva maneuver. The problem was remedied in one by insertion of a separate rate sensing lead in the right ventricular outflow tract, in the second by decreasing the rate of antibradycardia pacing of the ICD, and in the third by decreasing the sensitivity of the ICD. We conclude that the possibility of sensed diaphragmatic myopotentials should be considered at the time of ICD implant so that appropriate preventive measures can be taken.     

The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: Rationale, Design, Results, Clinical Implications and Lessons for Future Trials

The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) trial randomized 506 patients and tested the hypothesis that the dual-chamber pacing mode would produce improved hemodynamics and would in turn reduce congestive heart failure, heart failure hospitalizations, heart failure deaths, atrial fibrillation, strokes, ventricular arrhythmias, and total mortality compared to backup ventricular pacing in patients indicated for implantable defibrillator therapy. Patients had either primary prevention indications (47%) or secondary prevention indications (53%) for implantable defibrillator therapy but had no indications for bradycardia pacemaker support. All the patients had moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less (mean = 27%) and were consistently treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (86%) and beta adrenergic blocking agents (85%). The primary combined endpoint of hospitalization for congestive heart failure or death was paradoxically increased and statistically significant (p = 0.03) at one year in the patients paced in the dual chamber mode (22.6%) compared to patients randomized to ventricular backup pacing (13.3%). Both heart failure hospitalization and mortality contributed outcome. Another perspective would consider this a randomized controlled study of presence or absence of pacemaker therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and indications for implantable defibrillator therapy. Ventricular backup pacing produced less than 3% ventricular and no atrial pacing, while dual chamber pacing produced approximately 60% atrial and ventricular paced heart beats. The poor outcome in the dual chamber paced group correlated with the percentage of right ventricular pacing and suggests that right ventricular pacing caused ventricular dyssynchrony. The poor outcome associated with right ventricular pacing compared to intrinsic activation in the control group of the DAVID trial is reminiscent of the poor outcome associated with prolonged intraventricular conduction activation in the control groups compared to biventricular pacing in the intervention groups of the cardiac resynchronization trials. The direct conclusion from these results are that patients with indications for implantable defibrillators and no indication for pacing should not be paced in the dual chamber pacing mode. It is not appropriate to conclude that only single chamber implantable defibrillators should be implanted. There are other potential advantages to having an implanted atrial lead including improved secondary outcomes. However the DAVID trial results suggest that the dual chamber paced mode was not associated with improved quality of life or decreased frequency of hospitalization, inappropriate shocks from the defibrillator or atrial fibrillation. The more important question is what is the optimal pacing mode in these patients? The AAIR mode is under investigation in the DAVID II study in an attempt to identify a pacing mode that preserves atrio-ventricular synchrony, normal atrio-ventricular timing, prevents bradycardia and also prevents right ventricular stimulation. Caution should be taken to not directly apply these results to patients with either an indication for pacemaker therapy or to patients with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy since patients from neither population were included. However, considering the large magnitude of the deleterious effects associated with dual chamber pacing in the DAVID trial future studies should explore the possibility that left ventricular stimulation may be the only pacing mode capable of preventing bradycardia without increasing death and congestive heart failure.     

Low recurrence of syncope in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing recurrence of syncope in patients with structural heart disease, previously unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias had an ICD implanted. All ICDs delivered antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy. Detection and therapy were programmed according to uniform criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63+/-11 years and most of them were male (36/38). After a mean follow-up of 28+/-15 (4-61) months, six patients died and one underwent heart transplantation. Syncope recurred in three patients, but in none of them was it caused by an arrhythmic event. In 18 patients, 113 episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were detected and appropriately treated by the ICD. The mean time from implant until first appropriate therapy was 18+/-14 months. The actuarial probability of receiving appropriate therapy was 20% and 42% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias, ICD prevents syncope associated with arrhythmic events. Frequent effective use of antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy seem essential to this aim.     

Determining the Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is an effective treatment for arrhythmias. The effects of RFCA on cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) function have varied. We aim to study the effect of RFCA on device parameters and clinical outcomes in patients with CIED. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study between 2011 and 2018. Generator and lead parameters were compared pre- and post-ablation using paired sample t-test. The median follow-up interval for documentation of procedure-related complications and clinical outcomes was 8 weeks. We identified 119 eligible patients; whose mean age was 64.5 ± 11.91 years and 22 (18.4%) were females. Types of CIED include single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (8.93%), dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (41.96%), and either dual-chamber or biventricular pacemakers (44.54%). Arrhythmias for which patients underwent RFCA include atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia (15.22%), atrial flutter (38.14%), atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (13.56%), and premature ventricular complex or ventricular tachycardia (20.34%). No statistically significant difference was observed in pre- and post-ablation: (1) atrial sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, lead impedance; (2) right ventricle sensing and pacing thresholds; and (3) left ventricle pacing threshold and impedance. A decrease in right ventricle impedance after ablation (549.77 ± 173 ohm vs 507.40 ± 129.0 ohm, P-value <0.004) was observed. Zero complications or deaths were observed. In this single-center study, RFCA did not significantly impact CIED function and was not associated with short-term complications. However longer follow-up is required to confirm these findings.     

Effectiveness of Ibutilide in Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Dual Chamber Stimulation

Aim of the study: To evaluate the effectiveness of Ibutilide in cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node disease wearing a dual chamber pacemaker and to assess the potential role of overdrive ventricular pacing in prevention of drug related proarrhythmia. Methods and Results: Fifty-three sinus node disease patients (35 males; mean age 75 ± 9.5 years), implanted with a dual chamber pacing system, with persistent atrial fibrillation, lasting for 328 ± 416 days, received 1–2 mg of intravenous Ibutilide. Pacing mode was programmed in VVI at 90 ppm, in order to suppress spontaneous ventricular activity. All patients were monitored for 4 hours. Late occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias was evaluated using the pacemaker memory. Ventricular pacing threshold, spontaneous electrogram amplitude and pacing impedance were measured before and after Ibutilide infusion. Cardioversion to sinus rhythm occurred in twenty-two patients (41.5%). Treatment success was significantly related to shorter atrial fibrillation duration. Paced QT interval duration increased from 412 ± 36 ms to 481 ± 40 ms (p < 0.0001), without differences between responders and non responders; QRS width did not change significantly (from 152 ± 25 ms to 161 ± 25 ms; p = n.s.). No early or late episodes of sustained or non sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were observed. Pacing and sensing threshold did not show any significant variation. Conclusions: Ibutilide showed a good effectiveness in treating persistent atrial fibrillation in paced patients. Overdrive ventricular pacing may have played a role in preventing drug induced ventricular proarrhythmia. No adverse effect on pacing threshold was observed.     

NASPE POLICY STATEMENT The NASPE* BPEG** Defibrillator Code

BERNSTEIN, A.D., et al .: The NASPE/BPEG Defibrillator Code. A new generic code, patterned after and compatible with the NASPE/BPEG Generic Pacemaker Code (NBG Code) was adopted by the NASPE Board of Trustees on January 23, 1993. It was developed by the NASPE Mode Code Committee, including members of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) and the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group (BPEG). It is abbreviated as the NBD (for NASPE/BPEG Defibrillator) Code. It is intended for describing the capabilities and operation of implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in conversation, record keeping, and device labeling, and incorporates four positions designating: (1) shock location; (2) antitachycardia pacing location; (3) means of tachycardia detection; and (4) antibradycardia pacing location. An additional Short Form, intended only for use in conversation, was defined as a concise means of distinguishing devices capable of shock alone, shock plus antibradycardia pacing, and shock plus antitachycardia and antibradycardia pacing. (PACE, Vol. 16, September 1993)     

Intradevice interaction in a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator preventing ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection

Failure to detect ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is a rare but serious problem. We report a case of failure to detect an episode of induced ventricular tachycardia by a dual chamber ICD, due to abbreviation of ventricular detection window secondary to programmed pacing parameters and a rate-smoothing algorithm. In this patient, the intradevice interaction was corrected by programming rate-smoothing off. This report highlights the potentially lethal consequences of critical timing relationships among the pacing function, arrhythmia detection, and the characteristics of the arrhythmia when using a modern dual chamber ICD. Physicians responsible for patients with ICDs must be aware of such interactions.     

Recent advances in pacemaker and implantable defibrillator therapy for young patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review is intended to highlight major clinical advances over the past year related to (1). biventricular pacing as a treatment for dilated myopathy, (2). growing clinical experience with implantable cardioverter defibrillators in pediatrics, (3). technical advances in standard antibradycardia pacing, and (4). an appraisal of the newly updated ACC/AHA/NASPE guidelines for device implant in children and adolescents. RECENT FINDINGS: Complex rhythm devices are being used more frequently in children. Biventricular pacing to improve ventricular contractility is a rapidly evolving technology that has now been applied to children and young adults with intraventricular conduction delay, such as bundle branch block after cardiac surgery. Implantable defibrillators are also being used for an expanding list of conditions, although lead dysfunction is seen as a fairly common complication in active young patients. Guidelines for device implantation have been developed, but the weight of evidence remains somewhat limited by the paucity of pediatric data in this field. SUMMARY: Thanks to refinements in lead design and generator technology, coupled with rapidly expanding clinical indications, pacemakers and implantable defibrillators have become increasingly important components of cardiac therapy for young patients. Expanded multicenter clinical studies will be needed to develop more objective guidelines for use of this advanced technology.     

Electrocerebral accompaniments of syncope associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the electrocerebral and clinical accompaniments of syncope associated with malignant ventricular cardiac arrhythmias. DESIGN: Survey of clinical and electroencephalographic changes during induced cardiac dysrhythmia. SETTING: Clinical electrophysiology laboratory of a university medical center. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with automatic cardioverter defibrillators due to previous cardiac arrest or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. INTERVENTION: Deliberate induction of cardiac dysrhythmia for routine, postoperative testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Continuous electrocardiographic, electroencephalographic, and video recording. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, lasting 15 to 126 seconds, were induced with definite loss of consciousness in 15 instances and probable loss in 2. In 10 episodes, there were motor accompaniments to the unconsciousness characterized by tonic activity or irregular muscle twitching. On regaining consciousness, patients were usually obtunded or confused for up to 30 seconds, depending on duration of induced cardiac dysrhythmia and unconsciousness. Electroencephalographic changes were variable. Background slowing was usually followed by relative loss of electrocerebral activity. In 2 patients, attenuation of background electrocerebral activity followed little or no change in background rhythms. In 5 episodes, electroencephalograms showed no change before loss of consciousness, but slowed thereafter in 4. CONCLUSIONS: Conspicuous motor activity may accompany syncope due to malignant ventricular arrhythmia and complicate the clinical distinction of syncope from seizures. Post-syncopal confusion generally lasts for less than 30 seconds. The electroencephalographic accompaniments of acute cerebral anoxia leading to syncope, and of the motor accompaniments of syncope, are more variable than previously appreciated, but electrographic seizure activity does not occur.     

埋藏式心脏转复除颤器患者的随访

目的报道7例埋藏式心脏转复除颤器(ICD)治疗恶性室性心律失常的情况。方法对6例单腔ICD及1例双腔ICD植入者进行随访,通过ICD程控仪调出储存的资料,了解ICD对恶性心律失常的治疗情况,并对其工作情况进行分析。结果随访5～44个月,平均23.7个月,ICD共检测到持续性室性心动过速(VT)2 129次,心室颤动(VF)6次。采用抗心动过速起搏(ATP)治疗VT的成功率为91.9%,ATP未能终止的VT经低能量转复(CV)治疗95.3%转为窦性心律,少数VT经治疗后加速为VF。高能量除颤(DF)终止VF的成功率为100%。4例12次误将室上性心动过速误判断为室性事件而启动治疗,其中2次心房颤动,10次窦性心动过速,经调整VT的识别参数及联合使用抗心律失常药物后未再发生类似情况。2例随访期间出现晕厥,ICD存储的信息显示发生了VF并复律成功。2例出现焦虑症,经心理治疗改善。结论术后严密随访,及时调整工作参数,同时关注患者的心理健康并给予针对性的心理支持和治疗,对提高ICD的治疗效果至关重要。     

Right ventricular pressure during ventricular arrhythmias in humans: potential implications for implantable antitachycardia devices

Implantable defibrillators use algorithms based on ventricular electrographic data to detect the onset and termination of arrhythmias, but these algorithms do not always differentiate hemodynamically stable from unstable arrhythmias. Although, ideally, left ventricular function should be used to assess the hemodynamic state, right ventricular pulse pressure can be assessed in humans on a long-term basis with a transvenous lead. The potential utility of right ventricular pulse pressure to assess hemodynamic stability was studied in 22 patients with induced ventricular arrhythmias. Right ventricular pressure was measured with use of a transvenous right ventricular endocardial pacing lead with a piezoelectric bender pressure sensor 3 cm from its tip. Single ventricular premature paced beats administered in up to a bigeminal frequency did not alter the mean right ventricular pulse pressure (control 33.7 +/- 26, bigeminy 35.7 +/- 26 mm Hg). Twenty-one episodes of induced ventricular tachycardia were studied in the electrophysiology laboratory. Five seconds after tachycardia induction, hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia had a longer cycle length (294 +/- 41 ms) and the right ventricular pulse pressure ratio was higher (0.55 +/- 0.26) than that in unstable ventricular tachycardia (cycle length 256 +/- 55 ms, p = 0.06; pulse pressure ratio 0.26 +/- 0.09, p less than 0.05). Twenty episodes of ventricular fibrillation were induced in eight patients. One second after induction, right ventricular pulse pressure decreased from 25 +/- 5 to 6 +/- 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). On the first beat after defibrillation, right ventricular pulse pressure increased to 24 +/- 14 mm Hg, a level not significantly different from that before the induction of ventricular fibrillation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Novedades en arritmias y estimulación cardiaca en 2013

This report discusses a selection of the most relevant articles on cardiac arrhythmias and pacing published in 2013. The first section discusses arrhythmias, classified as regular paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias, together with their treatment by means of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The next section reviews cardiac pacing, subdivided into resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring of implantable devices, and pacemakers. The final section discusses syncope.     

Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block

The use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is well accepted as an important option for the treatment of patients with systolic heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. CRT for patients with narrow QRS complexes is reserved for patients who are undergoing implantation of new or replacement pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators with an anticipated significant requirement for ventricular pacing. The Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) Trial examined the role of CRT in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block and demonstrated significantly better outcomes with CRT compared to right ventricular pacing. On the other hand, conflicting preliminary data were reported by the Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace) Trial investigators. In this review, we will discuss the adverse consequences of chronic right ventricular pacing, the options of alternate pacing sites in the right ventricle versus biventricular pacing, and the findings from the BLOCK HF Trial as well as the preliminary data from the BioPace Trial. Our goal is to explore the role of biventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.