Continuous positive airway pressure improves nocturnal baroreflex sensitivity of patients with heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea

OBJECTIVES: To determine the acute effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) for heart rate during sleep in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). DESIGN AND METHODS: In eight CHF patients with OSA not previously treated with CPAP, spontaneous BRS was assessed during overnight polysomnography prior to the onset of sleep, and during stage 2 non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) before, during and after application of CPAP. RESULTS: CPAP alleviated OSA and acutely increased the slope of BRS (median, 25%,75%) [from 3.9 (3.5, 4.8) to 6.2 (4.6, 26.2) ms/mmHg, P<0.05]. Increases in the slope of BRS persisted following withdrawal of CPAP [4.9 (4.3, 6.9) ms/mmHg, P<0.05]. CPAP also lowered heart rate (from 81.3 +/- 4.9 to 76.0 +/- 5.7 bpm, P< 0.05), an effect which persisted after its withdrawal (76.7 +/- 5.7 bpm, P < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure at the midpoint of the pressure range of BRS sequences fell while on CPAP (from 139 +/- 8 to 120 +/- 7 mmHg, P < 0.05), and remained lower following CPAP withdrawal (124 +/- 9 mmHg, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In CHF patients with OSA, CPAP increases acutely BRS during sleep, lowers heart rate and resets the operating point for BRS to a lower blood pressure. These effects of CPAP persist after its withdrawal, suggesting that nocturnal CPAP therapy may cause sustained improvement in the neural control of heart rate.     

Continuous positive airway pressure treatment improves baroreflex control of heart rate during sleep in severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

The role of the arterial baroreflex in the cardiovascular changes associated with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), and the effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on baroreflex function during sleep are unknown. Baroreflex control of heart rate was studied in 29 normotensive patients with OSAS under no treatment, in 11 age-matched control subjects, and in 10 patients at CPAP withdrawal after 5.5 +/- 3.7 (range 3-14) months of treatment. Baroreflex control of heart rate was assessed by "sequence method" analysis of continuous blood pressure recordings (Finapres) obtained during nocturnal polysomnography. In untreated OSAS, baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was low during wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (REM) stage 2 sleep compared with control subjects, and correlated inversely with mean lowest Sa(O(2)) and the blood pressure increase after apneas. After CPAP treatment, the apnea-hypopnea index was lower, and mean lowest Sa(O(2)) higher than before treatment. After CPAP, patients were more bradycardic, blood pressure and its standard deviation decreased as Sa(O(2)) improved in non-REM stage 2 sleep, and BRS increased (nocturnal wakefulness: +59%; non-REM stage 2 sleep: +68% over pretreatment values). Our data suggest that baroreflex dysfunction in OSAS may be at least partly accounted for by nocturnal intermittent hypoxemia, and can be reversed by long-term CPAP treatment.     

Refractory hypertension and sleep apnoea: effect of CPAP on blood pressure and baroreflex.

This study was undertaken to determine whether abolition of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) could reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with refractory hypertension. In 11 refractory hypertensive patients with OSA, the acute effects of CPAP on nocturnal BP were studied during sleep and its longer term effects on 24-h ambulatory BP after 2 months. During a single night's application, CPAP abolished OSA and reduced systolic BP in stage 2 sleep from 138.3 +/- 6.8 to 126.0 +/- 6.3 mmHg. There was also a trend towards a reduction in average diastolic BP (from 77.7 +/- 4.5 to 72.9 +/- 4.5). CPAP usage for 2 months was accompanied by an 11.0 +/- 4.4 mmHg reduction in 24-h systolic BP. In addition, both the nocturnal and daytime components of systolic BP fell significantly by 14.4 +/- 4.4 and 9.3 +/- 3.9 mmHg, respectively. Diastolic BP was reduced significantly at night by 7.8 +/- 3.0 mmHg. In patients with refractory hypertension, acute abolition of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure reduces nocturnal blood pressure. These data also suggest that continuous positive airway pressure may reduce nocturnal and daytime systolic blood pressure chronically. Randomised trials are needed to confirm the latter results.     

Sustained effect of continuous positive airway pressure on baroreflex sensitivity in congestive heart failure patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND: Patients with either heart failure or obstructive sleep apnea have a reduced baroreflex sensitivity for heart rate, a sign of poor prognosis. We previously demonstrated that nocturnal application of continuous positive airway pressure to heart failure patients with obstructive sleep apnea increased baroreflex sensitivity acutely, but it is not known whether these effects persist into wakefulness. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treating obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure patients with continuous positive airway pressure improves baroreflex sensitivity during wakefulness. METHODS: Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity was assessed during wakefulness in 33 heart failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 45%) with obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > or = 20). Subsequently, baroreflex sensitivity was reassessed 1 month after patients were randomly allocated to nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure treatment or no treatment (control). RESULTS: Compared with the 14 control patients, the 19 continuous positive airway pressure-treated patients experienced a greater increase in baroreflex sensitivity [median, (25%, 75%)] [from 5.4 (2.2, 8.3) to 7.9 (4.4, 9.4) ms/mmHg; P = 0.01] and left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001). In addition, daytime systolic blood pressure and heart rate decreased more in the continuous positive airway pressure group (from 122 +/- 15 to 113 +/- 12 mmHg; P = 0.02, and from 66 +/- 8 to 62 +/- 8 bpm; P < 0.001, respectively) than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Treatment of coexisting obstructive sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure in heart failure patients improves baroreflex sensitivity during wakefulness in addition to improving left ventricular ejection fraction and lowering blood pressure and heart rate. These data indicate that the improved autonomic regulation of heart rate in heart failure patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea during sleep persists into wakefulness.     

Evidence for left ventricular dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

There is limited information on the development of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in the absence of lung and cardiac comorbidity. This study aimed to investigate whether OSA patients without heart morbidity develop LV dysfunction, and to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on LV function. Twenty-nine OSA patients and 12 control subjects were studied using technetium-99m ventriculography to estimate LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV peak emptying rate (LVPER), time to peak emptying rate (TPER), peak filling rate (LVPFR) and time to peak filling rate (TPFR) before and after 6 months of treatment with CPAP. A significantly lower LVEF was found in OSA patients, compared to control subjects, (53+/-7 versus 61+/-6%) along with a reduced LVPER (2.82+/-0.58 versus 3.82+/-0.77 end-diastolic volumes x s(-1)). Furthermore, OSA patients had significantly lower LVPFR (2.67+/-0.71 versus 3.93+/-0.58 end-diastolic volumes x s(-1)) and delayed TPFR (0.19+/-0.04 versus 0.15+/-0.03 s) in comparison with the control group. Six-months of CPAP treatment was effective in significantly improving LVEF, LVPER, LVPFR and TPFR. In conclusion, obstructive sleep apnoea patients without any cardiovascular disease seem to develop left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, which may be reversed, either partially or completely, after 6 months of continuous positive airway pressure treatment.     

Impact of CPAP on asthmatic patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

The impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on the airway responsiveness of asthmatic subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has scarcely been studied. A prospective study was performed comparing the changes in airway responsiveness and quality of life in stable asthmatic OSA patients, before and 6 weeks after their nocturnal CPAP treatment. A total of 20 subjects (11 males and nine females) participated in the study. With the nocturnal CPAP treatment, the apnoea/hypopnoea index dropped from 48.1 +/- 23.6 x h(-1) to 2.6 +/- 2.5 x h(-1). There were no significant changes in airway responsiveness after CPAP treatment (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1); PC(20) 2.5 mg x mL(-1) (1.4-4.5)) compared with baseline (PC(20) 2.2 mg x mL(-1) (1.3-3.5)). There was no significant change in FEV(1) either. However, the asthma quality of life of the subjects improved from 5.0 +/- 1.2 at baseline to 5.8 +/- 0.9 at the end of the study. In conclusion, nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure treatment did not alter airway responsiveness or forced expiratory volume in one second in subjects with stable mild-to-moderate asthma and newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea. However, nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure treatment did improve asthma quality of life.     

Predictors of decreased spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

BACKGROUND: The impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) on the arterial baroreflex, and its significance, is still under debate. We investigated the baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) during sleep in well-selected OSAS patient and control subject cohorts METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 10 non-OSAS subjects, 14 subjects with mild-to-moderate OSAS, and 14 male subjects with severe OSAS subjects. Groups were matched for age, body mass index, and other relevant variables. Subjects had no other disease and were not receiving regular medication. BP was monitored beat-by-beat (Portapres; Finapres Medical Systems; Amsterdam, the Netherlands) at night during polysomnography. Spontaneous BRS was assessed by the sequence technique. Heart-rate correction was also applied to calculate BRS at a heart rate (HR) of 60 beats/min (BRS-60) to account for intersubject variability in baseline HR. Eight suitable patients were treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and BRS measurements were repeated 6 weeks later. RESULTS: BRS and BRS-60 were significantly lower in patients with severe OSAS than in patients with mild-to-moderate OSAS and in non-OSAS subjects, and a separate sleep-stage analysis revealed this difference to be evident in stage 2 non-rapid eye movement sleep and during nocturnal wakefulness. There was no difference in BRS and BRS-60 between non-OSAS subjects and patients with mild-to-moderate OSAS. In multivariate analysis, the desaturation index was the only independent predictor of depressed BRS. CPAP therapy significantly improved the BRS measures. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe OSAS demonstrate depressed BRS during sleep, which may contribute to the cardiovascular pathophysiology in OSAS patients.     

Proportional positive airway pressure: a new concept to treat obstructive sleep apnoea.

Proportional positive airway pressure (PPAP) was designed to optimize airway pressure for the therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In a randomized crossover prospective study, the clinical feasibility of PPAP and its immediate effects on the breathing disorder and sleep in comparison with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was evaluated. Twelve patients requiring CPAP therapy underwent CPAP and PPAP titration in a random order. Obstructive and mixed respiratory events could be completely abolished with both forms of treatment. This efficacy could be achieved at a significantly lower mean mask pressure during PPAP titration (8.45+/-2.42 cmH2O) compared to CPAP (9.96+/-2.7 cmH2O) (p=0.002). The mean minimal arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) (82.8+/-6.5%) on the diagnostic night increased significantly (p<0.001) to an average Sa,O2 of 93.35+/-1.71% and 93.19+/-2.9% during CPAP and PPAP titration. Total sleep time, slow wave sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep increased significantly by the same amount during both CPAP and PPAP titration (p<0.001), while sleep stage nonrapid eye movement (NREM) 1 and 2 decreased. Six patients preferred the PPAP titration night, four patients did not have a preference, and two patients preferred CPAP. The present data show that proportional positive airway pressure is as effective as continuous positive airway pressure in eliminating obstructive events and has the same immediate effect on sleep. The lower average mask pressure during proportional positive airway pressure implies potential advantages compared to continuous positive airway pressure. Proportional positive airway pressure presents a new effective therapeutic approach to obstructive sleep apnoea.     

Blood pressure responsiveness to obstructive events during sleep after chronic CPAP.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether chronic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) affects blood pressure (BP) responsiveness to obstructive events occurring on the first night of CPAP withdrawal in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) after chronic treatment. Thirteen male subjects with severe OSA underwent nocturnal polysomnography with beat-by-beat BP monitoring before treatment and after 4.9 +/- 3.4 months of home CPAP (mean daily use 5.1 +/- 1.7 h). Variations in oxyhaemoglobin saturation (deltaSa,O2), systolic (deltaPs), and diastolic (deltaPd) BP within nonrapid eye movement apnoeas and hypopnoeas were measured on a sample of pre- and post-treatment events. In addition, a pretreatment sample was selected for deltaSa,O2 to match post-treatment events. The higher the mean deltaSa,O2 was in the full pretreatment sample, the more deltaSa,O2, deltaPs and deltaPd were attenuated after treatment. Mean deltaPs decreased from 47.3 +/- 8.5 in the full pretreatment sample to 42.2 +/- 6.9 in the selected pretreatment sample, to 31.5 +/- 5.9 mmHg in the post-treatment sample. The post-treatment value differed significantly from both the pretreatment values. The corresponding values for mean deltaPd were 27.0 +/- 3.5, 24.0 +/- 3.1 and 19.6 +/- 3.7 mmHg, with all values differing significantly from each other. Chronic continuous positive airway pressure is followed by a decrease in apnoea/ hypopnoea-related blood pressure swings, possibly secondary to both reduced severity of event-related hypoxaemia and decreased responsiveness to obstructive events secondary to chronic prevention of nocturnal intermittent hypoxaemia.     

Endothelin-1 plasma levels are not elevated in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor, is released mainly by vascular endothelial cells under the influence of hypoxia and other stimuli. ET-1 is related to endothelial dysfunction, as well as arterial and pulmonary hypertension, all of which are thought to be associated with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). This study evaluated venous plasma concentrations of ET-1 and noradrenaline and 24-h systemic blood pressure in 29 patients with OSA (age=56.9+/-1.6 yrs; body mass index=29.5+/-0.7 kg x m2 (mean+/-SEM)). Blood samples were taken in the morning, evening and during sleep. In the same way, the patients were assessed during a night of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and after 13.9+/-1.4 months while still on CPAP. ET-1 levels were compared to those of control subjects, who were selected from in- and outpatients and were matched to patients for age, sex, presence of arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease. ET-1 plasma levels were not elevated in the patients compared to the controls (41.6+/-2.2 and 44.9+/-1.3 pg x mL(-1), respectively, p=0.20). The ET-1 concentration did not change significantly, neither during sleep nor in the first night on CPAP therapy, nor under long-term treatment with CPAP. ET-1 neither correlated to the severity of OSA nor to that of systemic hypertension. The results suggest that endothelin-1 does not play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnoea.     

Obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease - time to act!

Sleep related breathing disorders are common and their potential to disrupt sleep leading to daytime fatigue and hypersomnolence is widely acknowledged. In the future, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) may become even more important because obesity as a main risk factor is increasingly prevalent. Apart from disturbing sleep, OSA has also been recognised as a risk factor for hypertension, acute cardiovascular events and metabolic disturbance such as insulin resistance. Several randomised controlled trials demonstrated a positive effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on arterial blood pressure, leading the "Joint National Council on High Blood Pressure" to list obstructive sleep apnoea as the first identifiable cause of arterial hypertension. Recently, a growing body of evidence demonstrated also a risk reduction of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events by treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. A beneficial effect of treatment of OSA was also shown for patients with heart failure, or heart rhythm disturbance. Obstructive sleep apnoea may no longer be seen as a cause for daytime sleepiness and impaired quality of life only, but also as an independent risk factor, at least for the occurrence of hypertension but probably for any cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. While prospective controlled trials to document a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are awaited, therapeutic nihilism seems no longer appropriate. With effective treatment available, subgroups that may profit best remain to be identified.     

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in stroke.

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) following stroke is high and OSA is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and poor functional outcome. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the treatment of choice for OSA, but its effects in stroke patients are unknown. The effectiveness and acceptance of treatment with nCPAP in 105 stroke patients with OSA, admitted to rehabilitation was prospectively investigated. Subjective wellbeing was measured with a visual analogue scale in 41 patients and 24-h blood pressure was determined in 16 patients before and after 10 days of treatment. Differences were compared between patients who did and did not accept treatment. There was an 80% reduction of respiratory events with concomitant increase in oxygen saturation and improvement in sleep architecture. No serious side-effects were noticed. Seventy-four patients (70.5%) continued treatment at home. Nonacceptance was associated with a lower functional status, as measured by the Barthel Index, and the presence of aphasia. Ten days after initiation of nCPAP, compliant users showed a clear improvement in wellbeing (differences in visual analogue scale (deltaVAS) mean+/-SD 26+/-26 mm) versus noncompliant patients (deltaVAS 2+/-25 mm, p=0.021). Only the compliant group had a reduction in mean nocturnal blood pressure (deltaBP; -8+/-7.3 mmHg versus 0.8+/-8.4 mmHg, p=0.037). Stroke patients with obstructive sleep apnoea can be treated effectively with nasal continuous positive airway pressure and show a similar improvement and primary acceptance to obstructive sleep apnoea patients without stroke. Continuous positive airway pressure acceptance is associated with improved wellbeing and decreased nocturnal blood pressure.     

Atrial overdrive pacing compared to CPAP in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

AIMS: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with oxygen desaturation, blood pressure increase, and neurohumoral activation, resulting in possible detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the therapy of choice for OSA. In a recent study, nocturnal atrial overdrive pacing (pacing) reduced the severity of sleep apnoea in pacemaker patients. We compared the effects of CPAP with those of pacing in patients with OSA but without pacemaker indication or clinical signs of heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with OSA on CPAP therapy were studied for three nights by polysomnography. During the nights that followed a night without any treatment (baseline), the patients were treated with CPAP or pacing in a random order. Pacing was performed with a temporary pacing lead. The pacing frequency was 15 b.p.m. higher than the baseline heart rate. The apnoea-hypopnoea index was 41.0 h(-1) (12.0-66.6) at baseline and was significantly lower during CPAP [2.2 h(-1) (0.3-12.4)] compared with pacing [39.1 h(-1) (8.2-78.5)]. Furthermore, duration and quality of sleep were significantly improved during CPAP when compared with pacing. CONCLUSION: Nocturnal atrial overdrive pacing is no alternative therapeutic strategy to CPAP for the treatment of OSA in patients without clinical signs of heart failure and without conventional indication for anti-bradycardia pacing.     

Changes in heart rate during obstructive sleep apnoea.

The mechanisms behind the decrease in heart rate during apnoeas in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are little known. Recent findings in animal experiments indicate that stimulation of the upper airway activates postinspiratory and cardiac vagal neurones in the medullary respiratory centre, causing alterations in heart rate and respiratory rhythm. Since OSA leads to a collapse of the airway and consequent stimulation of upper airway receptors, we studied the interrelations between heart rate and respiratory rhythm during apnoea and during negative intrathoracic pressure generated by the Mueller manoeuvre (MM). Fifteen patients with OSA (apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) 45 +/- 28.h-1) were studied by polysomnography, during a MM and a Valsalva manoeuvre, each of 15 s duration. The heart rate decrease (delta HRA) and the increase in total respiratory cycle duration (TOT) were evaluated during apnoea in non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Patients with OSA demonstrated a decrease in heart rate during apnoea (-14.4 +/- 9.0 beats.min-1), and during MM (-11.5 +/- 13.5 in OSA vs 3.1 +/- 7.8 beats.min-1 in a control group). TOT increased during apnoea (4.6 +/- 3.1 s). There was a significant correlation between delta HRA and AHI (r = -0.64) as well as between delta HRA and increase in TOT (r = 0.62). These findings indicate that upper airway obstruction may cause an activation of receptors at the site of airway collapse or distortion leading to changes in heart rate and respiratory rhythm.     

Haemodynamic effects of short-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in sleep apnoea syndrome: monitoring by a finger arterial pressure device.

We have evaluated the effects of short-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy on systemic blood pressure and heart rate in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Twenty five consecutive patients were examined during baseline conditions (No-CPAP) and during one night of nCPAP treatment (CPAP). The mean value and the variation coefficient of cardiovascular variables, examined by a finger arterial pressure device (Finapres), were determined in wakefulness and sleep. Without nCPAP an increase in blood pressure from wakefulness to sleep was observed in all patients from 138 +/- 3 mmHg to 146 +/- 3 and 155 +/- 4 mmHg, and from 80 +/- 1 mmHg to 82 +/- 2 and 84 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively, for systolic and diastolic values in non rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Conversely, heart rate decreased from 75 +/- 2 beats.min-1 to 70 +/- 2 and 69 +/- 2 beats.min-1. In addition, variability of heart rate and blood pressure was greatly increased compared with the awake state. Short-term nCPAP therapy significantly reduced systolic pressure from 144 +/- 3 mmHg to 137 +/- 3 and 143 +/- 4 mmHg during NREM and REM sleep, respectively, associated with a decrease in heart rate (from 69 +/- 2 to 65 +/- 2 beat.min-1). In total sleep and in all sleep stages a significantly reduced variability (p less than 0.001) was found. No changes were observed for diastolic pressure during CPAP night compared with baseline conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prevalence and treatment of central sleep apnoea emerging after initiation of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea without evidence of heart failure

Background  

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of complex sleep apnoea (CompSA), defined as central sleep apnoea (CSA) emerging after the initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), in patients with normal brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, along with assessing the prevalence of CSA persisting in such patients after the onset of CPAP therapy. We hypothesised that the prevalence of CompSA and persistent CSA after CPAP initiation would be low in patients with OSA and normal BNP levels.     

Objective measurement of compliance with nasal CPAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

Compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has become a major concern, since this treatment is efficacious, but constraining. In 46 consecutive obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients, we measured compliance with nasal CPAP by establishing a mean rate of use, with a built-in time counter read at three-month intervals, over a mean follow-up period of 232 +/- 27 days. The mean rate of use in the whole group was 5.14 +/- 0.31 hours per day. The acceptance rate was 90.9-93.2%, showing that patient acceptance is not a limitation in the use of nasal CPAP.     

Pulmonary hypertension in obstructive sleep apnoea: effects of continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized, controlled cross-over study.

AIMS: We tested the hypothesis that: (i) obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by itself originates pulmonary hypertension (PH); and (ii) the application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can reduce pulmonary pressure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this randomized and cross-over trial, 23 middle-aged OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index, 44.1 +/- 29.3 h(-1)) and otherwise healthy patients and 10 control subjects were included. OSA patients randomly received either sham or effective CPAP for 12 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters, blood pressure recordings, and urinary catecholamine levels were obtained at baseline and after both treatment modalities. At baseline, OSA patients had higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure than control subjects (29.8 +/- 8.8 vs. 23.4 +/- 4.1 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.036). Ten out of 23 patients [43%, (95% CI: 23-64%)] and none of the control subjects had PH at baseline (P = 0.012). Two patients were removed from the study because of inadequate CPAP compliance. Effective CPAP induced a significant reduction in the values for pulmonary systolic pressure (from 28.9 +/- 8.6 to 24.0 +/- 5.8 mmHg, P < 0.0001). The reduction was greatest in patients with either PH or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction at baseline. CONCLUSION: Severe OSA is independently associated with PH in direct relationship with disease severity and presence of diastolic dysfunction. Application of CPAP reduces pulmonary systolic pressure levels.     

Sympathetic activity is reduced by nCPAP in hypertensive obstructive sleep apnoea patients.

There is increasing evidence that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) lowers blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients, not only during sleep but also in the daytime. However, both the mechanisms of blood pressure reduction and the considerable differences in the magnitude of the effect in the studies presented to date are not fully understood. Therefore, the authors prospectively studied the effect of nCPAP on noradrenaline plasma levels (NApl), blood pressure and heart rate (HR) in 10 normotensive and eight hypertensive OSA patients before and after 41.6 +/- 16.9 days of nCPAP therapy. Polysomnography and invasive blood pressure were continuously monitored over 24 h in the supine position before and with nCPAP. NApl were analysed every 15 min. In hypertensives, nCPAP reduced NApl by 36 +/- 25%, lowered mean arterial blood pressure substantially (night-time: -8.89 +/- 14.09 mmHg; daytime: -7.94 +/- 10.47 mmHg) and decreased HR by 6.6 +/- 5.4 beats x min(-1), whereas in normotensives there were only minor changes. The decrease in heart rate was associated with a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and noradrenaline plasma levels, suggesting a causal effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This nasal continuous positive airway pressure effect occurs mainly in hypertensive obstructive sleep apnoea patients, whereas the effect is small in normotensives. This may explain, at least in part, some of the discrepant results in previous treatment studies.     

An auto-continuous positive airway pressure device controlled exclusively by the forced oscillation technique.

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) has been demonstrated to be a very sensitive tool for the assessment of upper airway obstruction during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a novel auto-CPAP device based exclusively on the FOT. Following manual CPAP titration, 18 patients with OSA (mean apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) 48.0+/-28.1) were allocated to conventional CPAP and auto-CPAP treatment under polysomnographic control in randomized order. The patients were asked to assess their subjective daytime sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The mean AHI during auto-CPAP treatment was 3.4+/-3.4 and was comparable with that obtained during conventional CPAP treatment (4.2+/-3.6). The analysis of sleep architecture, the arousal index (6.6+/-2.1 versus 7.3+/-4.4) or the ESS (5.6+/-1.8 versus 7.3+/-4.4) did not reveal any significant differences. However, the mean CPAP pressure during auto-CPAP treatment (0.84+/-0.26 kPa) and in particular the pressure applied in the lateral body position (0.74+/-0.35 kPa), was significantly lower than that employed in conventional CPAP treatment (0.93+/-0.16 kPa, both comparisons: p<0.05). The auto-continuous positive airway pressure device proved equally as effective as conventional continuous positive airway pressure. However, the mean treatment pressure was significantly reduced, especially when patients were sleeping in the lateral position.