Fulvestrant: a new type of estrogen receptor antagonist for the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor- positive tumors are candidates for endocrine treatment. Current treatment options include the selective estrogen receptor modulators (e.g., tamoxifen and toremifene), which inhibit estrogen receptor signaling, and the aromatase inhibitors (e.g., anastrozole and letrozole), which prevent the conversion of androgens into estrogen in postmenopausal women. As most patients eventually become resistant to endocrine agents, there is a need for new treatments that are effective, well tolerated and lack cross-resistance with currently available therapies. This review describes the development of fulvestrant (Faslodex), a new type of endocrine agent, which is an estrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects. Phase III clinical trials have found that fulvestrant is as effective and well tolerated as anastrozole for treating postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have progressed on one prior endocrine therapy. In addition, fulvestrant has first-line efficacy similar to that of tamoxifen in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Moreover, in a compassionate-use program, it has become clear that fulvestrant is not cross-resistant with other therapies. Therefore, fulvestrant is a versatile new treatment option for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy.     

Fulvestrant – a new treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer

Approximately 75% of breast tumours in postmenopausal women are positive for the oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or the progesterone receptor (PgR) and are, therefore, potential candidates for endocrine treatment. Fulvestrant is a new type of ER antagonist with no agonist effects and a novel mode of action; it binds, blocks and degrades the ER, leading to a reduction in cellular ER and, consequently, in PgR levels. This novel mode of action results in a lack of cross-resistance with other commonly used endocrine treatments. In Phase III trials in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior anti-oestrogen therapy, fulvestrant was at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, in terms of time to progression and objective response, and was associated with similar overall survival. In the first-line setting, fulvestrant showed similar efficacy to tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive disease. Efficacy in more heavily pretreated patients has also been demonstrated in the fulvestrant compassionate use programme. Fulvestrant is well tolerated, being associated with a significantly lower incidence of joint disorders compared with anastrozole, and a lower incidence of hot flushes compared with tamoxifen. Fulvestrant, therefore, provides clinicians with a useful additional treatment for hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Ongoing trials will help to clarify the optimal position of fulvestrant in the endocrine treatment sequence for these patients.     

Fulvestrant - a new treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer

Approximately 75% of breast tumours in postmenopausal women are positive for the oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or the progesterone receptor (PgR) and are, therefore, potential candidates for endocrine treatment. Fulvestrant is a new type of ER antagonist with no agonist effects and a novel mode of action; it binds, blocks and degrades the ER, leading to a reduction in cellular ER and, consequently, in PgR levels. This novel mode of action results in a lack of cross-resistance with other commonly used endocrine treatments. In Phase III trials in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior anti-oestrogen therapy, fulvestrant was at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, in terms of time to progression and objective response, and was associated with similar overall survival. In the first-line setting, fulvestrant showed similar efficacy to tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive disease. Efficacy in more heavily pretreated patients has also been demonstrated in the fulvestrant compassionate use programme. Fulvestrant is well tolerated, being associated with a significantly lower incidence of joint disorders compared with anastrozole, and a lower incidence of hot flushes compared with tamoxifen. Fulvestrant, therefore, provides clinicians with a useful additional treatment for hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Ongoing trials will help to clarify the optimal position of fulvestrant in the endocrine treatment sequence for these patients.     

Emerging data on the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant, a unique antiestrogen therapy for advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: Fulvestrant is an antiestrogen therapy with a unique mechanism of action. Unlike the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen, fulvestrant has no known estrogen agonist activity and is considered a pure antiestrogen. Its primary mechanism of action is thought to result from downregulation of the estrogen receptor (ER). Considerable data have demonstrated the efficacy of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with ER-positive advanced breast cancer, both in the first-line setting and following disease progression on tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Recent studies report improved benefit with alternative dosing strategies. At all administration schedules, fulvestrant has an excellent safety profile with no significant adverse effects. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a review of the mechanism of action of fulvestrant and the preclinical and clinical data evaluating its use as a form of endocrine therapy. The reader will gain insight into the pharmacologic properties of the drug and its role in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. EXPERT OPINION: Based on data demonstrating the efficacy of fulvestrant, including prolonged clinical benefit in many patients, this well-tolerated antiestrogen is an important therapy for breast cancer. The optimal position of fulvestrant in the sequence of endocrine therapies for postmenopausal women and its role in combination regimens are not yet resolved.     

氟维司群治疗乳腺癌的若干问题

氟维司群是一种新型甾体雌激素受体拮抗药,可在细胞水平下调雌激素受体和孕激素受体数量,且无激动效应。氟维司群对激素受体阳性的乳腺癌疗效确切,耐受性好,是一种新的内分泌治疗药物。本文回顾氟维司群治疗乳腺癌的临床研究进展,讨论若干临床应用关键问题。     

Emerging data on the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant,a unique antiestrogen therapy for advanced breast cancer

Introduction: Fulvestrant is an antiestrogen therapy with a unique mechanism of action. Unlike the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen, fulvestrant has no known estrogen agonist activity and is considered a pure antiestrogen. Its primary mechanism of action is thought to result from downregulation of the estrogen receptor (ER). Considerable data have demonstrated the efficacy of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with ER-positive advanced breast cancer, both in the first-line setting and following disease progression on tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Recent studies report improved benefit with alternative dosing strategies. At all administration schedules, fulvestrant has an excellent safety profile with no significant adverse effects.

Areas covered: This article provides a review of the mechanism of action of fulvestrant and the preclinical and clinical data evaluating its use as a form of endocrine therapy. The reader will gain insight into the pharmacologic properties of the drug and its role in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Expert opinion: Based on data demonstrating the efficacy of fulvestrant, including prolonged clinical benefit in many patients, this well-tolerated antiestrogen is an important therapy for breast cancer. The optimal position of fulvestrant in the sequence of endocrine therapies for postmenopausal women and its role in combination regimens are not yet resolved.     

Fulvestrant

Fulvestrant, a novel oestrogen receptor (ER) downregulator, is a pure anti-oestrogen which completely blocks the trophic actions of oestrogens without exerting any partial agonist effects. It reduces expression of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and proliferative and cell turnover indices. The drug is well-tolerated with minimal systemic side effects. Large randomised trials have demonstrated similar efficacy to anastrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. While results of a Phase III trial comparing fulvestrant with tamoxifen as first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal advanced breast cancer are awaited, future studies on its role in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, as well as in premenopausal women are required. With the role of tamoxifen as the gold standard of first-line therapy being challenged by the third generation aromatase inhibitors, direct comparison of the latter with fulvestrant in the first-line setting may also be worthwhile.     

Fulvestrant

Fulvestrant, a novel oestrogen receptor (ER) downregulator, is a pure anti-oestrogen which completely blocks the trophic actions of oestrogens without exerting any partial agonist effects. It reduces expression of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and proliferative and cell turnover indices. The drug is well-tolerated with minimal systemic side effects. Large randomised trials have demonstrated similar efficacy to anastrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. While results of a Phase III trial comparing fulvestrant with tamoxifen as first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal advanced breast cancer are awaited, future studies on its role in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, as well as in premenopausal women are required. With the role of tamoxifen as the gold standard of first-line therapy being challenged by the third generation aromatase inhibitors, direct comparison of the latter with fulvestrant in the first-line setting may also be worthwhile.     

The Twenty-third Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

This paper reviews the recent Twenty-third Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. A total of 580 studies were presented either orally or as posters. Two phase III multi-centre clinical trials found that fulvestrant (Falsodex), given as a once-monthly intramuscular injection (250 mg), was well-tolerated and at least as good as anastrozole (1 mg) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer that had progressed or recurred on prior endocrine therapy. Another phase III randomised trial found that letrozole (2.5 mg daily) was superior to tamoxifen as a neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with ER- and/or PgR-positive breast cancer unsuitable for breast-conserving surgery. In a phase III study, capecitabine (Xeloda) was found to be well-tolerated and able to improve survival by three months when added to Taxotere. Cutting edge data on microarray gene profiling in breast cancer were presented. The potential role of this new technology in predicting outcome and selecting therapy was discussed. Furthermore, its limitations and the need for validation were highlighted. The role of new diagnostic tools, such as fibre-optic ductoscopy (FDS) and microcatheters to obtain ductal cells, was discussed. Finally, the worldwide overview was presented.     

An evaluation of fulvestrant for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Fulvestrant is currently the only selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that is approved for clinical use in estrogen receptor (ER) positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). The drug is approved as single-agent therapy in the first and second-line setting of metastatic ER-positive breast cancer.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors review the preclinical studies that were pivotal in the development of fulvestrant, the pharmacologic properties of the drug, and the key clinical trials that resulted in its approval for clinical use. The authors discuss mechanisms of endocrine resistance and potential targets for endocrine refractory disease while highlighting ongoing studies that assess fulvestrant use with novel agents.

Expert opinion: While fulvestrant has limited use in the first-line setting in advanced breast cancer, it is most frequently used in the second line after progression with aromatase inhibitors. The combination of fulvestrant with CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown a clear benefit over monotherapy in patients who progress on prior endocrine therapy. Further study is necessary to assess if patient outcomes can be enhanced by optimizing the sequence of endocrine therapies, targeting resistance pathways with novel agents, and development of new agents in the SERD class.     

Letrozole: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Letrozole (Femara), a nonsteroidal, third-generation aromatase inhibitor administered orally once daily, has shown efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced, hormone-sensitive breast cancer. In early-stage disease, extending adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (beyond the standard 5-year period of tamoxifen) improved disease-free survival; compared with placebo there was a 43% relative reduction in disease recurrences or new contralateral breast tumours at a median follow-up of 2.4 years. The results of 4 months' neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with untreated primary disease favour letrozole. In advanced breast cancer, letrozole was superior to tamoxifen as first-line treatment; time to disease progression was significantly longer (9.4 vs 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) and objective response rate was significantly greater with letrozole, but median overall survival was similar between groups. For second-line therapy of advanced breast cancer that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole showed efficacy equivalent to that of anastrozole and similar to or better than that of megestrol acetate. Letrozole is generally well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to tamoxifen; the most common treatment-related adverse events were hot flushes, nausea and hair thinning. In patients with tumours that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole was tolerated as least as well as, or better than, anastrozole or megestrol acetate. In the trial of extended adjuvant therapy, adverse events reported more frequently with letrozole than placebo were hot flushes, arthralgia, myalgia and arthritis. The long-term effects of letrozole on bone mineral density or lipid profile have not been determined and these parameters may require monitoring. In several pharmacoeconomic modelling studies from various public healthcare system perspectives, letrozole was considered a cost effective choice for first-line (vs tamoxifen) or second-line (vs megestrol acetate) treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. In conclusion, letrozole 2.5 mg/day is effective in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced breast cancer. The efficacy, cost effectiveness and favourable tolerability profile of letrozole are reflected in current treatment guidelines recommending the drug as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole is superior to tamoxifen for first-line treatment and is at least as effective as standard second-line treatments in disease that has progressed on antiestrogen therapy. For early-stage disease, letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting, and prolongs disease-free survival when administered after the standard 5-year period of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.     

Fulvestrant (AstraZeneca)

Fulvestrant (Faslodex) is an estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator under development by AstraZeneca for the potential treatment of breast cancer [172191], [237518], [314472], [349551]. In March 2001, an NDA was filed in the US for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women who have progressed on prior hormonal therapy [403574], [434825]; in December 2001, AstraZeneca was expecting to launch the compound in the US in thefirst half of 2002 [431887]. In August 2001, late-stage clinical trials were ongoing in Japan for breast cancer [422343]. Fulvestrant also has potential in the treatment of other estrogen-responsive tumors, such as uterine tumors [178081]. By 1997, fulvestrant was in phase II trials for uterine fibroids [272162], and by February 1999, it was reported that phase II trials for endometriosis were ongoing [314472], [336599]. However, no development has been reported for these indications since that time. In October 2001, Morgan Stanley expected launch in 2002, with estimated sales of $80 million in 2002 rising to $208 million in 2007 [429700]. Analysts at Lehman Brothers predicted in December 2001, that the product has a 90% chance of making it to market in 2002, with peak sales potential in this year of $800 million [434768].     

Pharmacokinetic profile of intramuscular fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the pharmacokinetics of a long-acting formulation of fulvestrant following intramuscular administration of single and multiple doses. STUDY DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic investigations of single and multiple doses of fulvestrant were conducted within two global phase III efficacy studies that compared intramuscular fulvestrant with oral anastrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer (study 0020, conducted in Europe, Australia and South Africa, and study 0021, conducted in North America). METHODS: Patients received once-monthly intramuscular injections of fulvestrant 250 mg (1 x 5 mL for < or =21 months in study 0020; 2 x 2.5 mL for < or =30 months in study 0021). Serial blood samples were collected for the first 28 days after the initial dose and immediately prior to all subsequent monthly doses. Plasma fulvestrant concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PATIENTS: Twenty-six (study 0020) and 193 (study 0021) postmenopausal women, comprising the pharmacokinetic subgroups of the phase III efficacy trials, were studied. Patients had shown disease progression or recurrence following previous hormonal therapy for advanced disease or had relapsed after adjuvant endocrine therapy with a nonsteroidal antiestrogen. OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: For single-dose fulvestrant 250 mg, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 28 days (AUC(28)), maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)), minimum observed plasma concentration at 28 days (C(min)) and time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) were determined. For multiple-dose fulvestrant 250 mg once monthly, steady-state trough concentrations (C(trough)) were determined. Plasma fulvestrant concentrations reached a peak at a median of 7 days (range 2-8 days) postdose, and declined biexponentially with a slower phase commencing approximately 2-3 weeks postdose. Intersubject variability in C(max) and AUC(28) was approximately 6-fold and 4-fold, respectively. Mean parameters for single-dose fulvestrant were: AUC(28), 148 microg. day/L; C(max), 8.2 microg/L; C(min), 2.6 microg/L; t(max), 7.0 days. Geometric mean C(trough) increased from 2.57 to 6.15 microg/L (study 0020) and from 2.38 to 6.52 microg/L (study 0021) over the first 6 months, reaching steady-state concentrations of approximately 6-7 microg/L (study 0020) or 9 microg/L (study 0021). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis, using a naive pooled data approach, suggests that observed single- and multiple-dose plasma profiles can be adequately described with a two-compartment kinetic model. Model-generated steady-state AUC(28) values were approximately 300 microg. day/L. CONCLUSIONS: The intramuscular formulation of fulvestrant displays predictable kinetics and approximately 2-fold accumulation on administration once monthly. At the proposed therapeutic dosage (250 mg once monthly), plasma fulvestrant concentrations are maintained within a narrow range throughout the administration interval, thus ensuring stable systemic drug exposure during long-term treatment.     

The Twenty-third Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Summary

This paper reviews the recent Twenty-third Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium¹. A total of 580 studies were presented either orally or as posters. Two phase III multi-centre clinical trials found that fulvestrant (Faslodex), given as a once-monthly intramuscular injection (250 mg), was well-tolerated and at least as good as anastrozole (1 mg) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer that had progressed or recurred on prior endocrine therapy. Another phase III randomised trial found that letrozole (2.5 mg daily) was superior to tamoxifen as a neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with ERand/or PgR-positive breast cancer unsuitable for breast-conserving surgery.

In a phase III study, capecitabine (Xeloda) was found to be well-tolerated and able to improve survival by three months when added to Taxotere. Cutting edge data on microarray gene profiling in breast cancer were presented. The potential role of this new technology in predicting outcome and selecting therapy was discussed. Furthermore, its limitations and the need for validation were highlighted. The role of new diagnostic tools, such as fibre-optic ductoscopy (FDS) and microcatheters to obtain ductal cells, was discussed. Finally, the worldwide overview was presented.     

Pure antiestrogens and breast cancer

Tamoxifen, which is the most commonly used drug for treatment of breast cancer, has both estrogen agonist and antagonist actions. Pure antiestrogens are devoid of any estrogen agonist effects. ICI 182,780 (fulvestrant) (Faslodex) and ICI 164,384 are competitive inhibitors of estrogen by binding to the estrogen receptor (ER). Preclinical and clinical studies show that fulvestrant and ICI 164,384 are more potent than tamoxifen in inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells. They are devoid of any estrogen-agonist action on the uterus and vagina but lack the beneficial effects of tamoxifen on the bone and serum lipid profile. Fulvestrant is the first pure antiestrogen to complete phase III clinical trials. Such studies have shown that fulvestrant is at least as good as anastrozole in the treatment of post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had relapsed or progressed on prior endocrine therapy. The drug was well tolerated and only minor side-effects were reported. Its potential role in the adjuvant setting will be determined by its adverse effects on bone mass and serum lipids. EM-800 and EM-652 are the most potent pure antiestrogens and EM-652 has the highest affinity of all antiestrogens to ER. They have no stimulatory effects on the uterus or vagina. It seems reasonable to expect that pure antiestrogens will be good alternatives to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer.     

Pure Antiestrogens and Breast Cancer

Summary

Tamoxifen, which is the most commonly used drug for treatment of breast cancer, has both estrogen agonist and antagonist actions. Pure antiestrogens are devoid of any estrogen agonist effects. ICI182,780 (fulvestrant) (Faslodex) and ICI164,384 are competitive inhibitors of estrogen by binding to the estrogen receptor (ER). Preclinical and clinical studies show that fulvestrant and ICI164,384 are more potent than tamoxifen in inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells. They are devoid of any estrogen-agonist action on the uterus and vagina but lack the beneficial effects of tamoxifen on the bone and serum lipid profile. Fulvestrant is the first pure antiestrogen to complete phase III clinical trials. Such studies have shown that fulvestrant is at least as good as anastrozole in the treatment of post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had relapsed or progressed on prior endocrine therapy. The drug was well tolerated and only minor side-effects were reported. Its potential role in the adjuvant setting will be determined by its adverse effects on bone mass and serum lipids. EM-800 and EM-652 are the most potent pure antiestrogens and EM-652 has the highest affinity of all antiestrogens to ER. They have no stimulatory effects on the uterus or vagina. It seems reasonable to expect that pure antiestrogens will be good alternatives to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer.     

依维莫司联合氟维司群用于激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌的研究进展

乳腺癌是一种经典的激素依赖性肿瘤,内分泌治疗是激素受体阳性［HR（+）］/人表皮生长因子 2 阴性 ［HER-2（-）］晚期乳腺癌的主要治疗方法。传统的内分泌药物,如他莫昔芬、芳香化酶抑制剂（AI）和氟维司群已被 广泛应用于晚期（局部晚期或转移）绝经后患者。然而,对于这种亚型的乳腺癌患者,在引入靶向药物,如人哺乳动 物雷帕霉素位点（mTOR）抑制剂和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6（CDK4/6）抑制剂后,内分泌治疗的选择已经扩大,出 现了各种靶向药物与内分泌治疗的组合。本文旨在探讨mTOR抑制剂依维莫司联合氟维司群在对AI耐药的雌激素 受体阳性［ER（+）］/HER-2（-）晚期乳腺癌中的应用。