A phase I study of estramustine, weekly docetaxel, and carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the maximal tolerated dose, safety, and efficacy of docetaxel, carboplatin, and estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Patients with HRPC received docetaxel for 3 weeks, followed by a rest week. Docetaxel (20, 25, 30, 36, or 43 mg/m2) was given on days 2, 9, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Patients also received estramustine (140 mg p.o. three times daily on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19) and carboplatin [area under the curve, AUC (5) or (6) on day 2]. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated. Five patients received carboplatin [AUC (6)] but experienced delayed thrombocytopenia. After a protocol amendment, 25 subsequent patients received carboplatin [AUC (5)]. Median age was 64 years. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 117 ng/mL. Fifty-three percent received prior ketoconazole and 10% had mitoxantrone. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. Although maximal tolerated dose was not reached, docetaxel dose escalation was stopped at 43 mg/m2. Significant myelosuppression was not seen until the highest dose level, when seven and four patients experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicities, respectively. Among all patients, PSA declines of > or =50% occurred in 63%. At the recommended phase II dose, PSA declines of > or =50% occurred in 75% (95% confidence interval, 43-95). Four of 14 (29%) patients with measurable disease had partial responses. Median survival was 14.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin are well tolerated and active in HRPC. Myelosuppression is the primary toxicity. The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel is 43 mg/m2 combined with estramustine and carboplatin. PSA declines were seen at every dose level.     

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere)-based regimens are the new standard therapy in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A synergistic activity has been shown with docetaxel in combination with estramustine in vitro; however, the benefit of this combination remains controversial in clinical practice. We assessed the activity and safety of docetaxel alone and docetaxel-estramustine in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 92) with metastatic HRPC and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) while receiving androgen suppression were randomized to 3-weekly treatment with either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 (D), or docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), day 2, plus oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily, days 1-5 (DE). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated (DE 47, D 44). A PSA response occurred in 68% (primary endpoint met) and 30% of patients, respectively. Median PSA response duration was 6.0 months in both groups. Median time to progression was 5.7 and 2.9 months, and median survival was 19.3 and 17.8 months in the DE and D arms, respectively. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxic effects were mild and similar in both arms. One patient in each group withdrew due to toxicity. Quality of life was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Combining estramustine with docetaxel in this schedule is an active and well-tolerated treatment option in HRPC.     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel/estramustine/carboplatin in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Purpose

The objective of this phase II study was to determine the response rate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer given paclitaxel/estramustine/carboplatin for weeks 1, 2, and 3 of a 4-week cycle.

Patients and Methods

Eighty-four patients were registered into the trial. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² and carboplatin area under the curve of 2 were administered intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16, and oral estramustine 280 mg 3 times daily was given on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 for 6 cycles. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, and 2 was 46%, 41%, and 13%, respectively, and median age was 70 years (range, 53-82 years), with 58 patients (69%) aged > 65 years. The majority of patients (83%) were white. Fifteen patients (18%) had received previous chemotherapy, 61 patients (73%) had undergone previous surgery, and 51 patients (61%) had received previous external-beam radiation therapy.

Results

Intent-to-treat analysis revealed a ≥ 50% prostate-specific antigen decrease rate of 61%. Median survival was 15.3 months. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 toxicities included fatigue (11%), nausea (10%), neutropenia (9%), anemia (6%), and vomiting (6%).

Conclusion

Paclitaxel/estramustine/carboplatin administered in a weekly regimen is highly effective in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and can be administered with reasonable safety in an outpatient setting.     

Phase II study of docetaxel, estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a final report of CALGB 9780. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: To investigate the combination of docetaxel, estramustine (EM), and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combinations of EM with other antimitotic agents such as docetaxel are synergistic in vitro and show significant clinical activity in patients with HRPC. We studied intravenous administration of docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), oral estramustine, and low-dose daily hydrocortisone in men with HRPC who demonstrated progression after initial hormone therapy. RESULTS: Of the 47 men enrolled onto this multicenter cooperative group study, 46 were assessable for response and/or toxicity. In the 24 patients with measurable disease, there were three complete and nine partial responses for a measurable disease response rate of 50% (12 of 24 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27% to 73%). In the 44 patients in whom pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was elevated, 30 (68%) had a 50% or greater decrease, and 25 (57%) had a 75% or greater decrease in PSA. The combined measurable disease and biochemical response rate in all 46 assessable patients was 54% (three complete responses, 22 partial responses, 95% CI, 37% to 71%). The predominant toxicity was neutropenia, with 26% of patients having grade 3 and 30% having grade 4 granulocytopenia; there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Other common but mild adverse effects included malaise/fatigue, peripheral edema, and hyperglycemia. The incidence of thromboembolic events during therapy was 9%. With a median follow-up of 17 months, the median survival was 20 months. The median time to disease progression was 8 months for all patients, and 10 months for those with measurable disease. CONCLUSION: This therapy is efficacious and moderately well tolerated in HRPC and should be compared in a phase III trial with mitoxantrone and prednisone.     

A phase I trial of docetaxel/estramustine/imatinib in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Background

Docetaxel/estramustine was a commonly used regimen to treat metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Imatinib inhibits the platelet-derived growth factor receptor that is expressed in prostate cancer and is synergistic with taxanes in preclinical prostate cancer models.

Patients and Methods

A phase I trial of docetaxel/estramustine/imatinib was undertaken to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of this combination. Patients with progressive, metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated every 21 days with fixed doses of estramustine (280 mg orally 3 times a day on days 1-5), imatinib (400 mg orally daily on days 1-21), dexamethasone (8 mg orally twice daily on days 1-3), and prophylactic warfarin (2 mg orally daily on days 1-21). Cohorts of 3-6 patients were enrolled to receive escalating doses of docetaxel on day 2 from 50 mg/m² to 60 mg/m² to 70 mg/m². Thirteen patients were treated.

Results

On dose level 3 (docetaxel 70 mg/m² and imatinib 400 mg daily), 2 patients experienced grade 3 elevations in prothrombin time, attributed to the interaction between imatinib and warfarin. The protocol was amended to include an intermediate dose level (docetaxel 60 mg/m² and imatinib 300 mg daily). However, in the overall study, there were 5 unacceptable toxicities (2 cerebrovascular accidents, 1 myocardial infarction, 1 mesenteric ischemia, and 1 deep venous thrombosis) in 13 patients; 2 of those toxicities resulted in death. The study was closed early to further accrual.

Conclusion

The high incidence of thromboembolic events observed when imatinib was combined with docetaxel/estramustine precludes further exploration of this regimen.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel,estramustine, etoposide,and carboplatin in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggest that the combination of intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel, carboplatin, oral etoposide, and oral estramustine (TEEC) has significant activity in patients with advanced, hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. The authors conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the addition of carboplatin to the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, estramustine, and etoposide (TEE). METHODS: Twenty patients with carcinoma of the prostate that was progressing despite hormone therapy were enrolled on this Phase II trial. Patients were treated with oral estramustine, 280 mg three times daily, and oral etoposide, 50 mg/m2, once daily on Days 1-7, with i.v. paclitaxel, 135 mg/m2, over 1 hour followed by carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on Day 2 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Patients were evaluated for response after three cycles, and three additional cycles were given to responding or stable patients. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were evaluable for response, and 12 patients had measurable disease at baseline. The measurable response rate was 58% (7 of 12 patients; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 28-85%), and all of those were partial responses. Eleven patients had decreases >50% from their baseline prostate specific antigen levels during therapy, for a response rate of 58% (95% CI, 34-80%) by this criterion. The median time to disease progression was 5.5 months, with a median survival of 14.2 months. Major toxicities included Grade (according to version 2 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) 4 neutropenia in 4 patients, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients, and anemia > or = Grade 3 in 4 patients. One patient had a deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TEEC was active in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. The regimen was tolerable, with primarily hematologic toxicity. The addition of carboplatin to TEE did not appear to add to the efficacy of the three-drug combination of antimicrotubule agents.     

Higher doses of mitoxantrone among men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone in combination with a low-dose glucocorticoid has been shown to produce more favorable outcomes among men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma than glucocorticoid alone. Therefore, the authors sought to determine the safety and activity of higher doses of mitoxantrone in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and a glucocorticoid in preparation for a possible Phase III trial comparing standard to dose-escalated mitoxantrone. METHODS: This Phase II trial enrolled 45 patients from October 1996 to March 1998. Twenty-one patients without pelvic irradiation (Arm I) received 21 mg/m(2) of mitoxantrone every 3 weeks, and 24 patients who had received pelvic irradiation (Arm II) were given 17 mg/m(2) on the same schedule. All patients received 40 mg of hydrocortisone in divided doses daily and GM-CSF at 500 microg/daily for a minimum of 10 days per cycle beginning on the third day of the cycle. RESULTS: In Arm I, 33% of assessable patients achieved a partial response, 50% had a > or = 50% decline in their PSA, and 35% had a > or = 75% decline in PSA values. The comparable numbers in Arm II were 24%, 48%, and 35%, respectively. The median survival times were 12 months in Arm I and 14 months in Arm II. Treatment had to be discontinued in 13% of patients because of thrombocytopenia. No other significant toxicities were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of mitoxantrone (17 and 21 mg/m(2)) were associated with activity comparable to many estramustine combinations and generally were well tolerated. However, because the degree and frequency of thrombocytopenia were greater than that observed with standard dose mitoxantrone (12-14 mg/m(2)), and because the median survival is apparently comparable to standard dose mitoxantrone, this approach to HRPC cannot be recommended for Phase III testing.     

A phase II Hoosier Oncology Group study of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the combined anti-microtubular regimen of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate (EMP) in hormone refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 (or 15 mg/m2 if a history of prior pelvic radiotherapy) was combined with EMP at 280 mg orally tds for 3 days (the day before, the day of and the day after vinorelbine infusion). After 8 weeks of therapy the combination was given every other week. RESULTS: From February 1998 to February 1999, 23 men were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range 50-83 years). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at entry was 160 ng/ml (range 0-802 ng/ml). A median of 13 weeks of therapy was administered and the median follow-up was 14.8 months. Eleven patients (48%) had lower extremity edema requiring diuretic therapy, two (9%) had grade 2 granulocytopenia and four patients [17%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5% to 39%] had a thromboembolic episode. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%; 95% CI 49% to 89%) had at least a 50% decrease in the PSA for at least 2 months with a median time to serologic progression of 3.5 months (range 0.75-10.5 months). One of eight patients (12.5%; 95% CI 0% to 53%) with measurable disease had a confirmed partial response. The estimated median survival was 15.1 months and the actual one year overall survival was 71% (95% CI 51% to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly vinorelbine with short course oral EMP is an active regimen as evaluated by rate of PSA response, time to progression and median survival. However, the toxicities of EMP, even when given as a short course, are still problematic.     

Dose-finding study of weekly docetaxel plus estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this phase I study was to find the maximum tolerated dose of weekly docetaxel in association with estramustine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Eleven patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with escalating weekly doses of docetaxel (level I, 3 patients, 30 mg/m2; level II, 3 patients, 35 mg/m2, level III, 3 patients, 40 mg/mz; level IV, 2 patients, 45 mg/m2) associated with fixed dosage of estramustine (840 mg/day). RESULTS: In level I, there was only one episode of grade 3 neutropenia; grade 1 nausea and vomiting were registered in 1 patient; in 1 patient mild edema of the lower limbs was noted. In level II, grade 2 stomatitis and grade 1 sensory symptoms occurred in 1 patient, and grade 1 edema in 1 case. In level Ill, grade 2 edema was noted in 2 patients, damage to nails in 1 patient, asthenia in 1 patient, grade 1 neuropathy in 2 patients, and grade 1 nausea in 1 patient. In level IV, grade 2 edema was present in 1 patient, grade 3 edema in 1 patient, changes with fall of nails and grade 2 erythema of face in 2 patients, asthenia in 2 patients, grade 1 neuropathy in both patients. Nine patients had a more than a 50% decrease in PSA after 2 cycles of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest a good tolerability of weekly 35 Mg/m2 docetaxel in hormone-refractory prostate cancer in association with estramustine.     

A phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Recent studies of docetaxel have demonstrated improved survival over mitoxantrone and prednisone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), supporting the study of novel docetaxel-containing regimens as primary therapy or following initial docetaxel-based therapy. To evaluate the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with HRPC, 40 patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with progressive metastatic disease despite androgen ablation were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 4 days starting 1 day prior to the docetaxel infusion. After the first three patients were enrolled, filgrastim was added on days 2–6 and 9–13. Of the 40 patients enrolled, 19 had no prior chemotherapy and 21 had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Of the 19 patients without prior chemotherapy and the 21 with prior chemotherapy, 7 (37%) and 6 (29%) , respectively, demonstrated a decrease in prostate specific antigen by >50% maintained for at least 4 weeks. Out of eight patients with measurable disease, one achieved a partial response and four demonstrated stable disease. There was one patient with deep vein thrombosis, and febrile neutropenia was noted in only three patients after the protocol was modified to include filgrastim support. The combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine with filgrastim was well tolerated and active against HRPC in patients with or without prior chemotherapy.This trial was supported in part by research grants from Aventis, Amgen, and P30 CA72720-01-03.     

Weekly administration of docetaxel in combination with estramustine and celecoxib in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer: final results from a phase II study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of weekly docetaxel, estramustine and celecoxib in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Forty-eight patients received 35 mg m(-2) of weekly docetaxel for 3 out of every 4 weeks, 280 mg of estramustine twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 and 400 mg of celecoxib twice daily until progression or toxicity. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for at least six cycles. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. Patients received a median of four cycles (range: 1-9). On an intention-to-treat analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was decreased greater than 50% in 28 out of 48 patients (overall response rate: 58%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 44-72) and median duration of PSA response was 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.9-9.0). After a median follow-up of 11.3 months, the median time to progression was 7.1 months and the median overall survival was 19.2 months. The most frequent severe toxicity was asthenia (15% of patients), diarrhoea and stomatitis (8% of patients, each). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in two patients. There was a toxic death during the study due to a gastric perforation. Celecoxib with weekly docetaxel and estramustine is an effective and safe treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, but it does not seem to add any benefit to docetaxel.     

Intermittent docetaxel therapy with estramustine for hormone-refractory prostate cancer in Japanese patients

Background  We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of intermittent docetaxel (DCT) with estramustine (EM) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods  Fifteen patients were enrolled. They received injected DCT (70 mg/m² body surface) on day 1 in association with oral EM 560 mg/day (days 1–5). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were categorized based on the first three courses. Patients exhibiting either a response or stable disease (SD) could have a holiday from treatment (intermittent schedule). The holiday continued until elevation of the PSA level from the nadir baseline level occurred three times. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Survival curves were established using Kaplan-Meier graphs. Results  The median number of courses of DCT/EM therapy was five (range, 3–12 courses). The response rate of the first cycle was 53%: 3 patients with complete response (CR), 5 patients with partial response (PR), 4 patients with SD, and 3 patients with disease progression. Eight patients were able to begin the second re-entry cycle. No patients showed a CR, 2 patients exhibited PR, 4 patients had SD, and the overall response rate was 25%. The survival rates were 93% at 1 year, and 26.1% at 2 years Grade 3–4 anemia was observed in 2 patients (13.3%), neutropenia in 11 (73.3%), and thrombocytopenia in 2 (13.3%). The QOL scale showed good QOL after 6 months, with improvement in the score for nausea and vomiting. Conclusion  Intermittent DCT/EM therapy was well tolerated, and has the potential to prolong survival, with a high QOL, in patients with HRPC.     

A phase 2 study of carboplatin plus docetaxel in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer who are refractory to docetaxel

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men in the U.S. To the authors' knowledge, there is no proven, effective, second-line therapy for docetaxel-refractory disease. Recent data suggest that platinum salts may be effective when combined with taxanes in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The authors conducted a phase 2 trial of docetaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy in this disease setting. METHODS: Eligible men had metastatic HRPC that had progressed during or within 45 days after the completion of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin at an area under the curve of 4 once every 21 days until they had either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Therapy was tolerated reasonably well; Grade 3 leukopenia (graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria grading system) was the most common adverse event (experienced by 56% of patients), but there was only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia reported. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines > or =50% were noted in 18% of patients, and measurable responses were observed in 14%. The median duration of PSA response was 5.7 months. The median progression-free survival was 3 months, and the median overall survival was 12.4 months. Patients were more likely to respond to the combination if they previously had responded to docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: In men with HRPC who developed progressive disease during or shortly after treatment with docetaxel, the addition of carboplatin resulted in modest additional activity. Taxane-refractory HRPC is an area of unmet need, and the current trial has provided evidence that platinum chemotherapy may be an important therapeutic option.     

Monthly paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Background We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of monthly paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods Patients with prostate cancer that was progressing despite androgen ablation therapy were treated with i.v. paclitaxel, 175 mg/m², over 3 h, followed by carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on day 1, with oral estramustine phosphate, 280 mg twice daily, for a 28-day treatment cycle. Estramustine phosphate was precluded in those patients who had experienced adverse effects during prior chemotherapies. Patients were evaluated for response every cycle, and the treatment was continued until the cancer progressed. Results Twenty-one patients with progressive hormone-refractory disease were treated for a median of 4 cycles (range, 1 to 11 cycles). Estramustine phosphate was precluded in seven patients. Post-therapy decreases in serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 50% and 75%, respectively, were seen in 43% and 19% of the patients (95% confidence intervals, 22% to 64% and 2% to 36%). Of the nine patients with measurable disease, 1 (11%) had a complete response and 2 (22%) had a partial response. The overall median time to progression was 4 months, and the median survival time for all patients was 11 months. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were anemia (29%), neutropenia (48%), and thrombocytopenia (24%). Mild peripheral neuropathy and myalgia/arthralgia were observed in 11 (52%) and 9 (43%) patients, respectively. Conclusion Monthly paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine phosphate has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with progressive HRPC.     

A phase II trial of dexamethasone, vitamin D, and carboplatin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: A Phase II prospective trial was performed to study the efficacy of combination therapy with dexamethasone, calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3), and carboplatin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Preclinical data from prostate cancer cell lines suggested a synergistic effect of these therapies. METHODS: All patients had pathologically confirmed prostate cancer with at least 2 consecutive increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Treatment started with 1 mg of oral dexamethasone given daily with 0.5 mcg of daily calcitriol added at the start of Week 5. Carboplatin (area under the concentration time curve = 2) was started at the beginning of Week 7. Initially, carboplatin was given weekly; however, the protocol was changed later to give carboplatin for the first 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle. Of 40 patients who consented to participate, 6 patients were ineligible or declined to start therapy, leaving 34 treated patients. The median follow-up was 80.7 weeks (range, 11.5-260 weeks). RESULTS: A formal PSA response was seen in 13 of 34 treated patients (38.2%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 22.2-56.4%). The median overall survival was 97.7 weeks (95% CI, 61-114 weeks). Significant adverse events that were observed during the trial period included 2 deaths (myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock), 4 patients with Grade 3 neutropenia (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0), 2 patients with thrombosis, 2 patients with inflammatory bowel symptoms, and 2 patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: The novel combination of dexamethasone, calcitriol, and carboplatin for patients with HRPC produced a PSA response in 13 of 34 patients and had an acceptable side-effect profile.     

Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Mitoxantrone-corticosteroid is currently the standard palliative treatment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Recent clinical trials documented the high activity of the docetaxel-estramustine combination. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (primary end point) and safety of two docetaxel-estramustine-prednisone (DEP) regimens and mitoxantrone-prednisone (MP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty metastatic HRPC patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2 or 35 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle) and estramustine (280 mg p.o. tid on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12) or mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; all patients received prednisone (10 mg daily). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were assessable for PSA response and safety. A > or = 50% PSA decline was found in a greater percentage of patients in the docetaxel arms (67% and 63%) compared with MP (18%; P = .0001). Median time to PSA progression was five times longer with DEP than with MP (8.8 and 9.3 v 1.7 months, respectively; P = .000001). Overall survival was better in the docetaxel arms (18.6 and 18.4 months) compared with the MP arm (13.4 months), but not significantly so (P = .3). Crossover rates differed significantly among treatment arms (16%, 10%, and 48% in arms A, B, and C, respectively; P = .00001). Treatment-related toxicities were mild and mainly hematologic. CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized phase II study showed significantly higher PSA decline < or = 50% and longer times to progression in HRPC patients receiving DEP-based chemotherapy than MP, and that DEP could be proposed in this setting.     

A phase II trial of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with refractory metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The similarity between the mechanism of action between docetaxel and estramustine generated the hypothesis of synergistic antimicrotubule effects and cytotoxicity when the two agents are combined. In addition, it has been demonstrated that estramustine binds P-glycoprotein in vitro and, thus, may prevent the efflux of taxanes in tumors that over-express P-glycoprotein. To further evaluate the combinations clinical efficacy and safety, a trial was performed in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with MBC were treated with estramustine 900 mg/m(2) per day divided into 3 doses given on Days 1-3 and docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) given by intravenous administration over 1 hour on Day 3 after the first dose of estramustine, every 21 days. Patients may have received any number of prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. RESULTS: Nine partial responses were observed in 31 assessable patients, for an objective response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval, 14-48%). The median progression free survival was 4 months (range, 1-41 months), and the median overall survival was 17 months (range, 2-45 months). Severe toxicities (Grade 3 or 4) were neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, and thrombosis. Seventy-five percent of patients experienced either an improvement or no change in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and estramustine produced responses in heavily pretreated women with MBC while maintaining quality of life.     

Phase II study of low-dose docetaxel/estramustine in elderly patients or patients aged 18-74 years with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Purpose

Chemotherapy is often poorly tolerated in elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. This trial was designed to determine whether low-dose weekly docetaxel/estramustine was efficacious with acceptable toxicity.

Patients and Methods

Dexamethasone was administered as premedication. Subjects received docetaxel 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16 and estramustine 140 mg orally twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17. Cycles were 28 days. Participants received ≤ 6 cycles unless progression or intolerable toxicity occurred.

Results

Fifty-eight subjects were enrolled at 31 sites in the US Oncology Network. Median age was 78 years (range, 64-92 years); performance status scores (0, 1, 2, and 3) were 36%, 38%, 24%, and 2%, respectively; 55 subjects received ≤ 1 cycle of treatment; and 4 participants were nonevaluable because they completed < 2 cycles. Among the 56 treated subjects, 38 (68%) had a decreased prostate-specific antigen level (≤ 50% compared with baseline level and maintained for ≤ 4 weeks). There were 40 subjects with measurable tumor(s). Responses, assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, were 1 complete response (2.5%), 7 partial responses (17.5%), 26 stable diseases (65%), and 6 progressive diseases (15%). At 1 year, 17% of participants were progression free; median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (range, 1-14.5 months); estimated 1-year survival was 65%. There were no grade 4 treatment-related events. Grade 3 treatment-related events included fatigue/asthenia (11%) and arrhythmia, dehydration, cerebral ischemia, thrombocytopenia, and dyspnea (4% each). There was 1 treatment-related death (acute respiratory distress syndrome).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that elderly men with advancedstage prostate cancer tolerate this regimen, with significant responses and prolonged progression-free survival. These patients should not be excluded from chemotherapeutic interventions based on age alone.     

A phase II, pharmacokinetic, and biological correlative study of oblimersen sodium and docetaxel in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor activity and safety of oblimersen sodium, a phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide directed to the bcl-2 mRNA, with docetaxel in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) and to determine if relevant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables of oblimersen or docetaxel influence response to this therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with HRPC were treated with oblimersen sodium by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1 to 8 with docetaxel given i.v. over 1 hour on day 6 every 3 weeks. Plasma samples were analyzed to characterize the pharmacokinetic variables of both oblimersen and docetaxel, and paired collections of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected to determine Bcl-2 protein expression pretreatment and post-treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received 173 courses of oblimersen (7 mg/kg/d continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-8) and docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 6). Prostate-specific antigen responses were observed in 14 of 27 (52%) patients, whereas 4 of 12 (33%) patients with bidimensionally measurable disease had objective responses. The mean oblimersen steady-state concentration (C(ss)) was a significant determinant of antitumor activity; mean C(ss) values were higher in responders compared with nonresponders (6.24 +/- 1.68 versus 4.27 +/- 1.22; P = 0.008). The median survival of all patients was 19.8 months. Bcl-2 protein expression decreased a median of 49.9% in peripheral blood mononuclear cells post-treatment, but the individual incremental change did not correlate with either oblimersen C(ss) or response. CONCLUSIONS: Oblimersen combined with docetaxel is an active combination in HRPC patients demonstrating both an encouraging response rate and an overall median survival. The absence of severe toxicities at this recommended dose, evidence of Bcl-2 protein inhibition, and encouraging antitumor activity in HPRC patients warrant further clinical evaluation of this combination, including studies to optimize oblimersen C(ss).