Better graft outcomes from offspring donor kidneys among living donor kidney transplant recipients in the United States

A recent study reported that kidney transplant recipients of offspring living donors had higher graft loss and mortality. This seemed counterintuitive, given the excellent HLA matching and younger age of offspring donors; we were concerned about residual confounding and other study design issues. We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data 2001‐2016 to evaluate death‐censored graft failure (DCGF) and mortality for recipients of offspring versus nonoffspring living donor kidneys, using Cox regression models with interaction terms. Recipients of offspring kidneys had lower DCGF than recipients of nonoffspring kidneys (15‐year cumulative incidence 21.2% vs 26.1%, P < .001). This association remained after adjustment for recipient and transplant factors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = _0.730.77_0.82, P < .001), and was attenuated among African American donors (aHR _0.770.85_0.95; interaction: P = .01) and female recipients (aHR _0.770.84_0.91, P < .001). Although offspring kidney recipients had higher mortality (15‐year mortality 56.4% vs 37.2%, P < .001), this largely disappeared with adjustment for recipient age alone (aHR = _1.021.06_1.10, P = .002) and was nonsignificant after further adjustment for other recipient characteristics (aHR = _0.930.97_1.01, P = .1). Kidneys from offspring donors provided lower graft failure and comparable mortality. An otherwise eligible donor should not be dismissed because they are the offspring of the recipient, and we encourage continued individualized counseling for potential donors.     

Impact of Age Difference,Sex Matching,and Body Mass Index Matching Between Donor and Recipient in Renal Transplant

BackgroundVarious factors influence kidney transplant (KT) outcome. The impact of age difference between donor and recipient on long- and short-term graft and patient survival in living donor KT remains unclear.ObjectiveWe aim to determine whether age difference, sex matching, and body mass index (BMI) matching between donor and recipient affect the 12-month patient and graft survival in KT.MethodWe studied a retrospective cohort of 804 patients 18 years or older with primary KT from January 2010 to December 2014. Patient renal function and patient survival were followed up for 12 months post KT. Repeated analysis of variance measurement determined if there was a significant difference in the mean creatinine levels when the sample was grouped according to the matching groups for sex, age difference, and BMI classification. Odds ratios were computed to ascertain graft loss and graft rejection. Results were considered statistically significant if P < .05.ResultsMale donor–female recipient had the lowest creatinine levels over time compared with male donor–male recipient (P < .001) and female donor–male recipient (P < .001). Older donor–younger recipient with age difference of ≥ 15 years had the highest overall creatinine (P < .001). For BMI matching, a normal donor and an underweight recipient combination resulted in the lowest mean creatinine levels over the course of 12 months (P < .001). In terms of graft rejection, odds ratio was highest for a female donor and a male recipient (P < .00a) compared with a male donor and a female recipient. For graft loss, older donors (≥ 15 years) had the highest risk (P < .001) vs those older by 11 to 15 years.ConclusionThere was significant difference in the 12-month graft function of patients when grouped according to their matching for age difference, sex, and BMI. The risk for graft rejection increases when the combination for donor-recipient is female donor–male recipient. For graft loss, this is most significant for donors who are older by ≥ 15 years than their recipients.     

Elevated HbA1c in donor organs from patients without a diagnosis of diabetes portends worse liver allograft survival

Recipients of liver allografts from diabetic donors have decreased graft survival. However, limited data exist on the effects of donor HbA1c. We hypothesized that allografts from nondiabetic donors with elevated HbA1c would be associated with decreased survival. Liver transplant recipients from the UNOS database from nondiabetic donors were stratified into two groups: euglycemic (HbA1c<6.5) and hyperglycemic (HbA1c≥6.5). Propensity score matching (10:1) was used to adjust for donor and recipient characteristics. Kaplan‐Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Donors of hyperglycemic allografts were older (49 vs 36, P<.001), were more likely to be non‐white, had a higher BMI (29.8 vs 26.2, P<.001), were more likely to engage in heavy cigarette use (1.5% vs 1.3%, P=.004), had higher serum creatinine levels (1.3 vs 1.0, P=.002), and were more likely to be an expanded‐criteria donor (35.8% vs 14.4%, P<.001). After propensity matching to account for these differences, allograft survival was significantly decreased in the recipients of hyperglycemic allografts (P=.049), and patient survival showed a trend toward reduction (P=.082). These findings suggest that HbA1c may be a simple and inexpensive test with potential utility for better organ risk stratification.     

Improved outcomes after live donor renal transplantation for septuagenarians

The average age of renal transplant recipients in the United States has increased over the past decade. The implications, however, have not been fully investigated. We explored predictors of success and demographic variables related to outcomes in elderly live donor transplantation. Retrospective analysis was performed using the UNOS database between 2001 and 2016. Donor characteristics and the graft failure rate of recipients above and below 70 years of age were compared across four eras: 2001-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012, and 2013-2016. There was a steady increase in average donor age from the first era to the fourth era (40-44) which was more evident among the septuagenarian patients (43-50) (P < .001). The 2-year graft survival rate improved from 92% in the first era to 96% in the fourth era (P < .001), and this was also more prominent in the >70 population (87%-93%) (P < .001). The >70 recipients were more likely to be non-Hispanic white (80.1% vs 65.1%, P < .001) and male (70.1% vs 61.0% P < .001), respectively. The donors were more likely to be non-Hispanic white and female in the >70 population. Live donation in the elderly is justified based on graft survival and patient survival. However, racial and gender differences exist in septuagenarian recipients and their donors.     

Predictive Factors of Graft-Censored Failure in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation in children has shown steady improvement in graft survival outcome over the last decades. Using data obtained from the transplantation registry of our center between 1984 and 2012, we assessed the independent determinants of graft failure using the Cox proportional hazards regression. Altogether, 128 recipients younger than 18 years of age at the time of kidney transplantation and who had >3 months graft survival were studied. During 9.95 years of medium follow-up, 27 censored graft failures occurred. Censored graft survival rates at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years post-transplantation were 93%, 82%, 70%, and 63%, respectively. Studied factors included recipient and donor age, recipient gender, dialysis vintage, donor/recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, panel-reactive antibody percentage, human leukocyte antigen mismatching, previous transplantation number, donor type (deceased vs living donation), cold ischemia time, induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, occurrence of acute tubular necrosis, and development of acute rejection. Using univariate analysis, the significant predictors for graft-censored failure were adult donor (P < .001), recipient age (P = .035), human leukocyte antigen mismatching (P = .025), antithymocyte globulin induction (P = .03), and development of acute rejection (P < .001). Two factors independently predicted graft-censored failure in multivariate analysis. The odds ratios for graft failure in patients with acute rejection and in children who received an organ of an adult were 3.744 and 4.962, respectively. Pediatric recipients should receive the first priority for allografts from pediatric donors and acute rejection should be meticulously prevented.     

The impact of donor and recipient diabetes on renal transplant outcomes

The use of diabetic kidneys is increasing worldwide with better outcome than being on waitlist and possible reversal of diabetic changes in transplanted kidneys. But particular caution is warranted in diabetic donor-recipient combination. Total 1223 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at our center between 2008 and 2018. 689 from non-diabetic donor (NDD) to non-diabetic recipient, 400 from non-diabetic donor to diabetic recipient, 97 from diabetic to non-diabetic recipient, and 32 from diabetic donor (DD) to diabetic recipient. The DD was older than NDDs (median age 48 vs 39 years, P < 0.0001). DD had higher BMI (35.6 vs 26.9, P < 0.0001), higher KDPI (74% vs 37%, P < 0.0001), and higher terminal creatinine (1.10 mg/dl vs 0.95 mg/dl, p 0.0046) than the NDD. Diabetes recipients were comparatively older (57 vs 54, P < 0.001). DD recipients had higher serum creatinine at 6 months (1.70 vs 1.50 mg/dl, p 0.00304) and 2 years post-transplant (1.70 vs 1.50 mg/dl P < 0.0002). DD recipients had more favorable end CPRA than NDD recipients (77.5% at 0% vs 67.4% at 0, P = 0.0074). Ten-year patient and graft survival was best in NDD-recipient pair and worse in DD-recipient pair. Diabetic donor kidneys to diabetic recipients have lower 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival.     

The influence of recipient body mass on the outcome of cadaver kidney transplants

Background. It is well known that a cadaver kidney transplant from an aged donor will result in lower graft survival. However, such marginal kidneys should not be easily given up, and it is important to explore ways to make the best use of them. Against this background, the present study was carried out to examine the relationship between recipient body mass and cadaver kidney transplant outcome. Methods. All 63 cadaver kidney transplant recipients at our institutions were studied. These patients were divided into two groups according to the age of the donor: group A (under age 60 years; n = 48) and group B (age 60 years and over; n = 15). Each of the groups was subdivided into two groups according to the mean body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) values, and the effects of BMI and BSA on graft survival were also studied. Results. There was no correlation between BMI and lowest serum creatinine (nadir S-Cr) in group A, but there was a positive correlation in group B. Similarly, there was a positive correlation between BSA and nadir S-Cr only in group B. In group A, there was no difference in graft survival between the recipients with a smaller BMI (BMI < 21.0) and larger BMI (BMI ≧ 21.0) or BSA. However, in group B, the 5-year graft survival of the recipients with a smaller BMI was 60.0%, and it was significantly better than that of the recipients with a larger BMI. Similarly, the 5-year graft survival of the recipients with a smaller BSA (BSA < 1.54 m²) was 62.5%, which was also significantly better than that of the recipients with a larger BSA (BSA ≧ 1.54 m²). Conclusions. In the recipients whose donor was aged 60 and over, recipient BMI and BSA affected posttransplant kidney function and graft survival. These results strongly suggest that the lower graft survival due to an aged donor can be improved if a recipient with a smaller body size can be selected. Received: January 10, 2001 / Accepted: March 28, 2002     

Kidney transplant outcomes from older deceased donors: a paired kidney analysis by the European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry

As the median age of deceased kidney donors rises, updated knowledge of transplant outcomes from older deceased donors in differing donor–recipient age groups is required. Using ERA‐EDTA Registry data we determined survival outcomes of kidney allografts donated from the same older deceased donor (55–70 years), and transplanted into one recipient younger and one recipient of similar age to the donor. The recipient pairs were divided into two groups: group 1; younger (median age: 52 years) and older (60 years) and group 2; younger (41 years) and older (60 years). A total of 1410 adults were transplanted during 2000–2007. Compared to the older recipients, the mean number of functioning graft years at 10 years was 6 months longer in the group 1 and group 2 younger recipients (P < 0.001). Ten‐year graft survival was 54% and 40% for the group 1 younger and older recipients, and 60% and 49% for the group 2 younger and older recipients. Paired Cox regression analyses showed a lower risk of graft failure (group 1 younger; adjusted relative risk [RRa]:0.57, 95% CI:0.41–0.79, and group 2 younger; RRa:0.63, 95% CI:0.47–0.85) in younger recipients. Outcomes from older deceased donor allografts transplanted into differing donor–recipient age groups are better than previously reported. These allografts remain a valuable transplant resource, particularly for similar‐aged recipients.     

Influence of recipient and donor age in pediatric renal transplantation

The influnece of recipient and donor age on the outcome of first cadaver kidney transplants was analyzed in a series of 1325 pediatric recipients and in 4230 transplants from pediatric kidney donors. Graft survival improved significantly with increasing recipient age (P<0.0001) and donor age (P<0.0001). Combined analysis of recipient and donor age groups revealed an overriding effect of donor age on graft outcome. Kidneys from donors younger than 3 years old consistently yielded poor results regardless of recipient age. Kidneys from adult donors gave the best results even in young recipients 0–5 years of age. With adult donor kidneys in cyclosporin-treated patients, high 1-year graft survival rates of 86±9% (SE) in 15 0-to 5-year-old recipients, 85±3% in 137 6-to 12-year-old recipients, and 83±1% in 6027 13-to 40-year-old recipients were observed.     

Outcomes of lung transplantation from donors with a history of substance abuse

ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine whether donor substance abuse (opioid overdose death, opioid use, cigarette or marijuana smoking) impacts lung acceptance and recipient outcomes.MethodsDonor offers to a single center from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed to determine if lung acceptance rates and recipient outcomes were affected by donor substance abuse.ResultsThere were 3515 donor offers over the study period. A total of 154 offers (4.4%) were opioid use and 117 (3.3%) were opioid overdose deaths. A total of 1744 donors (65.0%) smoked cigarettes and 69 donors (2.6%) smoked marijuana. Of smokers, 601 (35.0%) had less than 20 pack-year history and 1117 (65.0%) had more than 20 pack-year history. Substance abuse donors were younger (51.5 vs 55.2 P < .001), more often male (65.6 vs 54.8%, P < .001), more often White (86.2 vs 68.7%, P < .001), and had hepatitis C (8.3 vs 0.8%, P < .001). Donor acceptance was significantly associated with brain dead donors (odds ratio, 1.56, P < .001), donor smoking history (odds ratio, 0.56, P < .001), hepatitis C (odds ratio, 0.35, P < .001), younger age (odds ratio, 0.98, P < .001), male gender (odds ratio, 0.74, P = .004), and any substance abuse history (odds ratio, 0.50, P < .001), but not opioid use, opioid overdose death, or marijuana use. Recipient survival was equivalent when using lungs from donors who had opioid overdose death, who smoked marijuana, or who smoked cigarettes for less than 20 patient-years or more than 20 patient-years, and significantly longer in recipients of opioid use lungs. There was no significant difference in time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction for recipients who received lungs from opioid overdose death or with a history of opioid use, marijuana smoking, or cigarette smoking.ConclusionsDonor acceptance was impacted by cigarette smoking but not opioid use, opioid overdose death, or marijuana use. Graft outcomes and recipient survival were similar for recipients of lungs from donors who abused substances.     

Long‐term outcome of renal transplantation from octogenarian donors: A multicenter controlled study

To assess whether biopsy‐guided selection of kidneys from very old brain‐dead donors enables more successful transplantations, the authors of this multicenter, observational study compared graft survival between 37 recipients of 1 or 2 histologically evaluated kidneys from donors older than 80 years and 198 reference‐recipients of non–histologically evaluated single grafts from donors aged 60 years and younger (transplantation period: 2006‐2013 at 3 Italian centers). During a median (interquartile range) of 25 (13‐42) months, 2 recipients (5.4%) and 10 reference‐recipients (5.1%) required dialysis (crude and donor age‐ and sex‐adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.55 [0.34‐7.12], P = .576 and 1.41 [0.10‐19.54], P = .798, respectively). Shared frailty analyses confirmed similar outcomes in a 1:2 propensity score study comparing recipients with 74 reference‐recipients matched by center, year, donor, and recipient sex and age. Serum creatinine was similar across groups during 84‐month follow‐up. Recipients had remarkably shorter waiting times than did reference‐recipients and matched reference‐recipients (7.5 [4.0‐19.5] vs 36 [19‐56] and 40 [24‐56] months, respectively, P < .0001 for both comparisons). Mean (± SD) kidney donor risk index was 2.57 ± 0.32 in recipients vs 1.09 ± 0.24 and 1.14 ± 0.24 in reference‐recipients and matched reference‐recipients (P < .0001 for both comparisons). Adverse events were similar across groups. Biopsy‐guided allocation of kidneys from octogenarian donors permits further expansion of the donor organ pool and faster access to a kidney transplant, without increasing the risk of premature graft failure.     

Long-term kidney function and survival in recipients of allografts from living kidney donors with hypertension: a national cohort study

Allografts from living kidney donors with hypertension may carry subclinical kidney disease from the donor to the recipient and, thus, lead to adverse recipient outcomes. We examined eGFR trajectories and all-cause allograft failure in recipients from donors with versus without hypertension, using mixed-linear and Cox regression models stratified by donor age. We studied a US cohort from 1/1/2005 to 6/30/2017; 49 990 recipients of allografts from younger (<50 years old) donors including 597 with donor hypertension and 21 130 recipients of allografts from older (≥50 years old) donors including 1441 with donor hypertension. Donor hypertension was defined as documented predonation use of antihypertensive therapy. Among recipients from younger donors with versus without hypertension, the annual eGFR decline was −1.03 versus −0.53 ml/min/m² (P = 0.002); 13-year allograft survival was 49.7% vs. 59.0% (adjusted allograft failure hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23; 95% CI 1.05–1.43; P = 0.009). Among recipients from older donors with versus without hypertension, the annual eGFR decline was −0.67 versus −0.66 ml/min/m² (P = 0.9); 13-year allograft survival was 48.6% versus 52.6% (aHR 1.05; 95% CI 0.94–1.17; P = 0.4). In secondary analyses, our inferences remained similar for risk of death-censored allograft failure and mortality. Hypertension in younger, but not older, living kidney donors is associated with worse recipient outcomes.     

Motivations and outcomes of compatible living donor–recipient pairs in paired exchange

Increasing numbers of compatible pairs are choosing to enter paired exchange programs, but motivations, outcomes, and system-level effects of participation are not well described. Using a linkage of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and National Kidney Registry, we compared outcomes of traditional (originally incompatible) recipients to originally compatible recipients using the Kaplan–Meier method. We identified 154 compatible pairs. Most pairs sought to improve HLA matching. Compared to the original donor, actual donors were younger (39 vs. 50 years, p < .001), less often female (52% vs. 68%, p < .01), higher BMI (27 vs. 25 kg/m², p = .03), less frequently blood type O (36% vs. 80%, p < .001), and had higher eGFR (99 vs. 94 ml/min/1.73 m², p = .02), with a better LKDPI (median 7 vs. 22, p < .001). We observed no differences in graft failure or mortality. Compatible pairs made 280 additional transplants possible, many in highly sensitized recipients with long wait times. Compatible pair recipients derived several benefits from paired exchange, including better donor quality. Living donor pairs should receive counseling regarding all options available, including kidney paired donation. As more compatible pairs choose to enter exchange programs, consideration should be given to optimizing compatible pair and hard-to-transplant recipient outcomes.     

The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States

In the United States, kidney donation from international (noncitizen/nonresident) living kidney donors (LKDs) is permitted; however, given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems, concerns remain regarding the international LKD practice and recipient outcomes. We studied a US cohort of 102 315 LKD transplants from 2000‐2016, including 2088 international LKDs, as reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. International LKDs were more tightly clustered among a small number of centers than domestic LKDs (Gini coefficient 0.76 vs 0.58, P < .001). Compared with domestic LKDs, international LKDs were more often young, male, Hispanic or Asian, and biologically related to their recipient (P < .001). Policy‐compliant donor follow‐up was substantially lower for international LKDs at 6, 12, and 24 months postnephrectomy (2015 cohort: 45%, 33%, 36% vs 76%, 71%, 70% for domestic LKDs, P < .001). Among international LKDs, Hispanic (aOR = _0.230.36_0.56, P < .001) and biologically related (aOR = _0.390.59_0.89, P < .01) donors were more compliant in donor follow‐up than white and unrelated donors. Recipients of international living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) had similar graft failure (aHR = _0.780.89_1.02, P = .1) but lower mortality (aHR = _0.530.62_0.72, P < .001) compared with the recipients of domestic LDKT after adjusting for recipient, transplant, and donor factors. International LKDs may provide an alternative opportunity for living donation. However, efforts to improve international LKD follow‐up and engagement are warranted.     

Does the difference in donor and recipient weight influence renal graft survival?

Introduction

Grafts from older donors or those in recipients with a greater body mass index (BMI) as compared with the donor may develop hyperfiltration syndrome that shortens renal graft survival.

Objectives

To assess whether the differences in weight and BMI between donor and recipient correlated with renal function, proteinuria, or graft survival among recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors.

Materials and methods

We undertook a prospective, observational study in 180 recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors performed between 1999 and 2006. All grafts had been biopsied previously for viability. The recipients underwent immunosuppression with basiliximab, late introduction of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. The study population was divided into three groups, depending on the tertile of the donor-to-recipient weight ratio (<1, n = 64; 1-1.2, n = 56; >1.2, n = 60), and the donor-to-recipient BMI ratio (<0.97, n = 59; 0.97-1.13, n = 60; >1.13, n = 60). The glomerular filtration rate was estimated from the modified diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation.

Results

The mean age of the donors was 63.54 years and of the recipients, 58.38 years. The proportion of male-to-female donors was 52:48 and recipients 57.8:42.2 (P = NS). No significant differences in overall graft survival were observed between the tertiles. There was a negative correlation between the donor-to-recipient weight ratio and serum creatinine value at 1 (P < .001), 3 (P = .013), and 12 months (P = .005) after transplantation, and a positive correlation with the MDRD at 1 month (P < .001). No relation was noted between weight and proteinuria at 1 (P = .25), 3 (P = .51), or 12 months (P = .90). The results were similar after analyzing the ratio of the BMI to creatinine, MDRD or proteinuria, as well as in cases of a female donor to a male recipient.

Conclusions

Differences in weights between the donor and the recipient did not appear to affect graft survival or proteinuria among patients receiving grafts from expanded criteria donors, though it may be related to renal function during the early posttransplant stages.     

Results of liver transplantation with donors older than 70 years: a case-control study

Older donors are a growing part of the total pool but no definite consensus exists on the age limit for their acceptance. This retrospective case-control unicenter study compared the outcomes of 72 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) from April 1990 to April 2010 using donors older than 70 years versus 738 chronologically correlated OLTs performed with donors younger than 60 years. The percentage of refusal was greater among older than younger donors (48.2 vs 14.3%; P < .001). No difference was observed in mean cold ischemia times between older (370.5 minutes) versus younger groups (389.2 minutes). or in postoperative complications of rejection or renal insufficiency except for sepsis and mortality. Long-term survival was lower among transplant recipients from donors older than 70 years (P = .001) and these cases showed more blood requirements associated with prolonged cold ischemia (P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed graft dysfunction, mortality, and reduced survival to be associated with donor weight and recipient MELD (Model for End-stage Liver Disease) (P < .05). Interestingly, the mortality related to hepatitis C virus recurrence was not greater among patients whose donors were older than 70. Septuagenarians' livers can be used safely, but careful donor and recipient evaluation are required to avoid additional risk factors.     

Effect of Donor Ethnicity on Kidney Survival in Different Recipient Pairs: An Analysis of the OPTN/UNOS Database

Background

Previous multivariate analysis performed between April 1, 1994, and December 31, 2000 from the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database has shown that kidneys from black donors were associated with lower graft survival. We compared graft and patient survival of different kidney donor-to-recipient ethnic combinations to see if this result still holds on a recent cohort of US kidney transplants.

Methods

We included 72,495 recipients of deceased and living donor kidney alone transplants from 2001 to 2005. A multivariate Cox regression method was used to analyze the effect of donor–recipient ethnicity on graft and patient survival within 5 years of transplant, and to adjust for the effect of other donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics. Results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with the 95% confidence limit (CL) and P values.

Results

Adjusted HRs of donor–recipient patient survival were: white to white (1); and white to black (1.22; P = .001). Graft survival HRs were black to black (1.40; P <.001); black to white (1.35; P <.001); black to Hispanic (0.87; P = .18); and black to Asian (0.69; P =.05).

Summary

Black donor kidneys are associated with significantly lower graft survival when transplanted into whites or blacks and are only associated with lower patient survival when these kidneys are transplanted into white recipients. The graft and patient survival rates for Asian and Latino/Hispanic recipients, however, were not affected by donor ethnicity. This analysis underscores the need for research to better understand the reasons for these disparities and how to improve the posttransplant graft survival rates of black kidney recipients.     

High Perirenal Fat Volume Affect Negatively Renal Function in Living Renal Transplantation

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the effect of perirenal fat volume (PFV) on graft functions by calculating the PFV of donor kidney with routine computed tomography before renal transplantation.MethodsFrom May 2019 to December 2020, a total of 54 living donors and recipients who met the criteria for kidney donor were included in the study. Left donor nephrectomy was performed to all donors. Data of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), PFV of the donors, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum creatinine measurement data of the recipients were recorded. Serum creatinine and eGFR of the recipients were recorded at the 12th month controls. The patients were sorted into 2 groups (G) according to their GFR values. G1, GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²; G2, GFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m².ResultsThere was no difference in terms of recipient sex, recipient age, donor sex, recipient BMI, and donor BMI between the 2 groups. The mean of PFV was higher in G1 and was statistically significant (P= 0.01). The ability of the donor BMI and PFV to predict G2 was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. It was determined that PFV predicted G2 to be statistically significant. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, PFV (odds ratio = 0.988, 95% GA = 0.977-0.999, P = 0.03) was found as an independent predictor of G2.ConclusionsIn conclusion, our study showed PFV as an independent risk factor for low eGFR, revealing that the previously documented relevance of increased BMI with a low eGFR can be partially explained by PFV.     

Application of pediatric donors in split liver transplantation: Is there an age limit?

The experience of using pediatric donors in split liver transplant is exceedingly rare. We aim to investigate the outcomes of recipients receiving split pediatric grafts. Sixteen pediatric recipients receiving split liver grafts from 8 pediatric donors < 7 years were enrolled. The donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative course, postoperative complications, and graft and recipient survival rates were evaluated. The mean follow‐up time was 8.0 ± 2.3 months. The graft and recipient survival rates were 100%. The liver function remained in the normal range at the end of the follow‐up time in all recipients. No life‐threatening complications were seen in these recipients, and the only surgery‐related complication was portal vein stenosis in 1 recipient. Cytomegalovirus infection was the most common complication (62.5%). The transaminase level was significant higher in extended right lobe recipients in the early postoperative days, but the difference vanished at the end of first week; postoperative complications and graft and recipient survival rates did not differ between left and right graft recipients. Notably, the youngest split donor graft (2.7 years old) was associated with ideal recipient outcomes. Split liver transplant using well‐selected pediatric donors is a promising strategy to expand pediatric donor source in well‐matched recipients.     

Donor kidney glomerular filtration rate and donor/recipient body surface area ratio influence graft function in living related kidney transplantation

Abstract

Objective: This study seeks to account for the possibility that single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SKGFR) and donor/recipient (D/R) body surface area (BSA) ratio could act as cofactors for evaluating potential living related donors. Methods: The study population included 204 cases of LKRs with a functional graft that were regularly followed up for more than 2 years. Based on SKGFR and D/R BSA ratio, the recipients were divided into six groups: group A (SKGFR?<?40?mL/min, D/R BSA ratio?≤?0.8), group B (SKGFR?<?40?mL/min, 0.8?<?D/R BSA ratio?<?1.2), group C (SKGFR?<?40?mL/min, D/R BSA ratio?≥?1.2), group D (SKGFR?≥?40?mL/min, D/R BSA ratio?≤?0.8), group E (SKGFR?≥?40?mL/min, 0.8?<?D/R BSA ratio?<?1.2), and group F (SKGFR?≥?40?mL/min, D/R BSA ratio?≥?1.2). The database included donor, recipient, and transplant variables. Renal function of the recipients was recorded at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-transplantation, respectively. Results: The declining rate of SCr and graft eGFR in stable periods post-transplantation in group A were always worse than the other five groups, and the difference was statistically significant (p?<?0.05). The declining rate of SCr and graft eGFR in stable periods post-transplantation in groups C and F were always better than the other four groups, and the difference was statistically significant (p?<?0.05). Conclusions: Both SKGFR and D/R BSA ratio should be considered for choosing potential living related donors. Donors with SKGFR?<?40?mL/min and D/R BSA ratio?≤?0.8 should be carefully selected. Satisfactory graft function in donors with SKGFR?<?40?ml could be achieved if their D/R BSA ratio is >0.8.