Next-generation sequencing in X-linked intellectual disability

X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with more than 100 genes known to date. Most genes are responsible for a small proportion of patients only, which has hitherto hampered the systematic screening of large patient cohorts. We performed targeted enrichment and next-generation sequencing of 107 XLID genes in a cohort of 150 male patients. Hundred patients had sporadic intellectual disability, and 50 patients had a family history suggestive of XLID. We also analysed a sporadic female patient with severe ID and epilepsy because she had strongly skewed X-inactivation. Target enrichment and high parallel sequencing allowed a diagnostic coverage of >10 reads for ~96% of all coding bases of the XLID genes at a mean coverage of 124 reads. We found 18 pathogenic variants in 13 XLID genes (AP1S2, ATRX, CUL4B, DLG3, IQSEC2, KDM5C, MED12, OPHN1, SLC9A6, SMC1A, UBE2A, UPF3B and ZDHHC9) among the 150 male patients. Thirteen pathogenic variants were present in the group of 50 familial patients (26%), and 5 pathogenic variants among the 100 sporadic patients (5%). Systematic gene dosage analysis for low coverage exons detected one pathogenic hemizygous deletion. An IQSEC2 nonsense variant was detected in the female ID patient, providing further evidence for a role of this gene in encephalopathy in females. Skewed X-inactivation was more frequently observed in mothers with pathogenic variants compared with those without known X-linked defects. The mutation rate in the cohort of sporadic patients corroborates previous estimates of 5–10% for X-chromosomal defects in male ID patients.     

Chromosomal microaberrations in patients with epilepsy,intellectual disability,and congenital anomalies

Epilepsy is a common finding in patients with chromosomal macro‐ and micro‐rearrangements but only few aberrations show a constant pattern of seizures. DNA array‐based studies have reported causative copy number variations (CNVs) in 5–30% of patients with epilepsy with or without co‐morbidities. The interpretation of many of the detected CNVs remains challenging. In order to identify CNVs carrying epilepsy‐related genes we investigated 43 children with various patterns of epileptic seizures, intellectual disability (ID), and minor dysmorphism, using the Illumina® Infinium Human1M‐DuoV1 array. In three patients we found likely causative de novo CNVs, i.e. deletions in 1q41q42.12 (3.4 Mb) and 19p13.2 (834 kb), and a mosaic two‐segment duplication in 17p13.2 (218 kb) and 17p13.1 (422 kb). In six additional patients there were aberrations (a deletion in one and duplications in five patients) with uncertain clinical consequences. In total, the finding of causative chromosomal micro‐rearrangements in 3 out of 43 patients (7%) and potentially causative CNVs in 6 additional patients (14%) with epilepsy and ID but without major malformations confirms the power of DNA arrays for the detection of new disease‐related genetic regions.     

Mate pair sequencing for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in patients with intellectual disability and congenital malformations

Recently, microarrays have replaced karyotyping as a first tier test in patients with idiopathic intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital abnormalities (ID/MCA) in many laboratories. Although in about 14–18% of such patients, DNA copy-number variants (CNVs) with clinical significance can be detected, microarrays have the disadvantage of missing balanced rearrangements, as well as providing no information about the genomic architecture of structural variants (SVs) like duplications and complex rearrangements. Such information could possibly lead to a better interpretation of the clinical significance of the SV. In this study, the clinical use of mate pair next-generation sequencing was evaluated for the detection and further characterization of structural variants within the genomes of 50 ID/MCA patients. Thirty of these patients carried a chromosomal aberration that was previously detected by array CGH or karyotyping and suspected to be pathogenic. In the remaining 20 patients no causal SVs were found and only benign aberrations were detected by conventional techniques. Combined cluster and coverage analysis of the mate pair data allowed precise breakpoint detection and further refinement of previously identified balanced and (complex) unbalanced aberrations, pinpointing the causal gene for some patients. We conclude that mate pair sequencing is a powerful technology that can provide rapid and unequivocal characterization of unbalanced and balanced SVs in patient genomes and can be essential for the clinical interpretation of some SVs.     

Homozygous variants in the gene SCAPER cause syndromic intellectual disability

The S‐Phase Cyclin A Associated Protein In The ER (SCAPER) gene is a ubiquitously expressed gene with unknown function in the brain. Recently, biallelic SCAPER variants were described in four patients from three families with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and intellectual disability (ID). Here, we expand the spectrum of pathogenic variants in SCAPER and report on 10 further patients from four families with ID, RP, and additional dysmorphic features carrying homozygous variants in SCAPER. The variants found comprise frameshift, nonsense, and missense variants as well as an intragenic homozygous deletion, which spans SCAPER exons 15 and 16 and introduces a frameshift and a premature stop codon. Analyses of SCAPER expression in human and mouse brain revealed an upregulation of SCAPER expression during cortical development and a higher expression of SCAPER in neurons compared to neural progenitors. In the adult brain SCAPER is expressed in several regions including the cerebral cortex where it shows a layer‐specific expression with an expression peak in lower layer glutamatergic neurons. Our study supports the role of SCAPER variants in the pathogenesis of ID and RP, expands the variant spectrum and highlights the need for functional studies concerning the role of SCAPER during brain development and function.     

Exome sequencing reveals NAA15 and PUF60 as candidate genes associated with intellectual disability

Intellectual Disability (ID) is a clinically heterogeneous condition that affects 2–3% of population worldwide. In recent years, exome sequencing has been a successful strategy for studies of genetic causes of ID, providing a growing list of both candidate and validated ID genes. In this study, exome sequencing was performed on 28 ID patients in 27 patient‐parent trios with the aim to identify de novo variants (DNVs) in known and novel ID associated genes. We report the identification of 25 DNVs out of which five were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Among these, a two base pair deletion was identified in the PUF60 gene, which is one of three genes in the critical region of the 8q24.3 microdeletion syndrome (Verheij syndrome). Our result adds to the growing evidence that PUF60 is responsible for the majority of the symptoms reported for carriers of a microdeletion across this region. We also report variants in several genes previously not associated with ID, including a de novo missense variant in NAA15. We highlight NAA15 as a novel candidate ID gene based on the vital role of NAA15 in the generation and differentiation of neurons in neonatal brain, the fact that the gene is highly intolerant to loss of function and coding variation, and previously reported DNVs in neurodevelopmental disorders.     

Effect of inbreeding on intellectual disability revisited by trio sequencing

In outbred Western populations, most individuals with intellectual disability (ID) are sporadic cases, dominant de novo mutations (DNM) are frequent, and autosomal recessive ID (ARID) is very rare. Because of the high rate of parental consanguinity, which raises the risk for ARID and other recessive disorders, the prevalence of ID is significantly higher in near- and middle-east countries. Indeed, homozygosity mapping and sequencing in consanguineous families have already identified a plethora of ARID genes, but because of the design of these studies, DNMs could not be systematically assessed, and the proportion of cases that are potentially preventable by avoiding consanguineous marriages or through carrier testing is hitherto unknown. This prompted us to perform whole-exome sequencing in 100 sporadic ID patients from Iran and their healthy consanguineous parents. In 61 patients, we identified apparently causative changes in known ID genes. Of these, 44 were homozygous recessive and 17 dominant DNMs. Assuming that the DNM rate is stable, these results suggest that parental consanguinity raises the ID risk about 3.6-fold, and about 4.1 to 4.25-fold for children of first-cousin unions. These results do not rhyme with recent opinions that consanguinity-related health risks are generally small and have been “overstated” in the past.     

Challenges and opportunities in the investigation of unexplained intellectual disability using family‐based whole‐exome sequencing

Intellectual disability (ID), characterized by an intellectual performance of at least 2 SD (standard deviations) below average is a frequent, lifelong disorder with a prevalence of 2–3%. Today, only for at most half of patients a diagnosis is made. Knowing the cause of the ID is important for patients and their relatives, as it allows for appropriate medical care, prognosis on further development of the disorder, familial counselling or access to support groups. Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) now offers the possibility to identify the genetic cause for patients for which all previously available genetic tests, including karyotyping, specific gene analysis, or microarray analysis did not reveal causative abnormalities. However, data analysis of WES experiments is challenging. Here we present an analysis workflow implementable in any laboratory, requiring no bioinformatics knowledge. We demonstrated its feasibility on a cohort of 10 patients, in which we found a conclusive diagnosis in 3 and a likely diagnosis in 2 more patients. Of the three conclusive diagnoses, one was a clinically suspected mutation missed by Sanger sequencing, and one was an atypical presentation of a known monogenic disorder, highlighting two essential strengths of WES‐based diagnostics.     

The first patient with sporadic X-linked intellectual disability with de novo ZDHHC9 mutation identified by targeted next-generation sequencing

X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder involving more than 100 genes known to date. Here, we describe a Korean male infant with global developmental delay. He had neither facial dysmorphism nor skeletal abnormalities. Bayley scale of infant and toddler development third edition (Bayley-III) measured at age of 2 years revealed marked global developmental delays without Marfanoid habitus, structural brain abnormalities, or epilepsy. The patient's cognitive, motor, and language developmental ages were 8–9 months, 12 months, and 9 months, respectively. Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed a de novo mutation [NM_001008222.2(ZDHHC9): c.286C > T (p.(Arg96Trp))] in the affected patient. This mutation has been reported previously in a family XLID with Marfanoid features. Sanger sequencing analysis of the proband and his parents revealed that the missense mutation was present in the proband only (absent in his parents). This indicates that the mutation is de novo in origin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing sporadic XLID with de novo ZDHHC9 mutation identified by targeted next-generation sequencing.     

Non-syndromic X linked intellectual disability: Current knowledge in light of the recent advances in molecular and functional studies

Since the discovery of the FMR1 gene and the clinical and molecular characterization of Fragile X Syndrome in 1991, more than 141 genes have been identified in the X-chromosome in these 28 years thanks to applying continuously evolving molecular techniques to X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) families. In the past decade, array comparative genomic hybridization and next generation sequencing technologies have accelerated gene discovery exponentially. Classically, XLID has been subdivided in syndromic intellectual disability (S-XLID)—where intellectual disability (ID) is always associated with other recognizable physical and/or neurological features—and non-specific or non-syndromic intellectual disability (NS-XLID) where the only common feature is ID. Nevertheless, new advances on the study of these entities have showed that this classification is not always clear-cut because distinct variants in several of these XLID genes can result in S-XLID as well as in NS-XLID. This review focuses on the current knowledge on the XLID genes involved in non-syndromic forms, with the emphasis on their pathogenic mechanism, thus allowing the possibility to elucidate why some of them can give both syndromic and non-syndromic phenotypes.     

Exome sequencing reveals three homozygous missense variants in SNRPA in two sisters with syndromic intellectual disability

Splicing‐related gene mutations might affect the expression of a single gene or multiple genes and cause clinically heterogeneous diseases. With the advent of next‐generation sequencing, several splicing gene mutations have been exposed, yet most major spliceosome genes have no reports of germline mutations and therefore, their effects are largely unknown. We describe the previously unreported concurrence of intellectual disability, short stature, poor speech, and minor craniofacial and hand anomalies in 2 female siblings with 3 homozygous missense variants in SNRPA (a component of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex) characterized by homozygosity mapping and whole exome sequencing. Combined, c.97A>G, c.98T>C, and c.100T>A, in exon 2 of SNRPA lead to p.Ile33Ala and p.Phe34Ile exchanges, which were predicted in silico to be deleterious. Although both patients exhibited some clinical features seen in other spliceosomal disorders, their complete clinical phenotype appears to be rather uncommon, a finding that may further support the notion that mutations in components of the major spliceosome do not strictly lead to the same syndromes/phenotypes.     

Characterization of intellectual disability and autism comorbidity through gene panel sequencing

Intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous diseases. Recent whole exome sequencing studies indicated that genes associated with different neurological diseases are shared across disorders and converge on common functional pathways. Using the Ion Torrent platform, we developed a low‐cost next‐generation sequencing gene panel that has been transferred into clinical practice, replacing single disease‐gene analyses for the early diagnosis of individuals with ID/ASD. The gene panel was designed using an innovative in silico approach based on disease networks and mining data from public resources to score disease‐gene associations. We analyzed 150 unrelated individuals with ID and/or ASD and a confident diagnosis has been reached in 26 cases (17%). Likely pathogenic mutations have been identified in another 15 patients, reaching a total diagnostic yield of 27%. Our data also support the pathogenic role of genes recently proposed to be involved in ASD. Although many of the identified variants need further investigation to be considered disease‐causing, our results indicate the efficiency of the targeted gene panel on the identification of novel and rare variants in patients with ID and ASD.     

X-linked intellectual disability: Phenotypic expression in carrier females

To better understand the landscape of female phenotypic expression in X-linked intellectual disability (XLID), we surveyed the literature for female carriers of XLID gene alterations (n = 1098) and combined this with experience evaluating XLID kindreds at the Greenwood Genetic Center (n = 341) and at the University of Adelaide (n = 157). One-hundred forty-four XLID genes were grouped into nine categories based on the level of female phenotypic expression, ranging from no expression to female only expression. For each gene, the clinical presentation, gene expression in blood, X-inactivation (XI) pattern, biological pathway involved, and whether the gene escapes XI were noted. Among the XLID conditions, 88 (61.1%) exhibited female cognitive phenotypic expression only, while 56 (38.9%) had no female phenotypic expression (n = 45), phenotype expression with normal cognition in females (n = 8), or unknown status for female phenotypic expression (n = 3). In twenty-four (16.6%) XLID genes, XI was consistently skewed in female carriers, in 54 (37.5%) XI showed variable skewing, and in 33 (22.9%) XI was consistently random. The XI pattern was unknown in 33 (22.9%) XLID conditions. Therefore, there is evidence of a female carrier phenotype in the majority of XLID conditions although how exactly XI patterns influence the female phenotype in XLID conditions remains unclear.