Effect of premature ejaculation desensitisation therapy combined with dapoxetine hydrochloride on the treatment of primary premature ejaculation

To evaluate the overall treatment benefits of premature ejaculation desensitisation therapy combined with 30 mg dapoxetine hydrochloride treatment on patients with primary premature ejaculation (PPE). Ninety‐nine PPE patients were randomly divided into two groups at the ratio of 2:1. Sixty‐six PPE patients received premature ejaculation desensitisation therapy accomplished by Weili Automatic Semen Collection—Penis Erection Detection and Analysis workstation (WLJY‐2008) combined with 30 mg dapoxetine hydrochloride treatment (DTCD group), and another 33 patients received 30 mg dapoxetine hydrochloride‐only treatment (DO group). Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) and premature ejaculation profile (PEP) were recorded before and during the treatment, and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) in PPE was recorded at the fourth week and the end of the treatment and the items. In both groups were significantly improved (p < 0.0001) in IELT, PEP and CGIC for premature ejaculation compared with baseline, and DTCD treatment showed a more significant improvement on PPE patients in the items compared with DO treatment (p < 0.05). Thus, premature ejaculation desensitisation combined with dapoxetine therapy may be a better choice for improving premature ejaculation with PPE.     

Treatment benefit of dapoxetine for premature ejaculation: results from a placebo‐controlled phase III trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the overall treatment benefit of dapoxetine for premature ejaculation (PE), with specific emphasis on improvements in personal distress and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation. Although these factors are key elements of numerous sets of diagnostic criteria for PE, they have rarely been evaluated as outcome measures in clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trial we enrolled men aged ≥18 years, from the USA and Canada, who had a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision, diagnosis of PE (1238 men). Men were randomized to receive placebo or dapoxetine 60 mg as needed or once daily for 9 weeks. The once‐daily treatment arm was included for analysis of withdrawal symptoms (primary endpoint; presented elsewhere). Patients completed the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) on day 1 (before dosing), and on days 28 and 63 (or study endpoint), which comprised the outcome measures for perceived control over ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse, and personal distress and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation. The patient‐reported global impression of change in PE was reported on day 63 (or study endpoint). Treatment benefit measures included the composite criteria of at least a two‐category increase in perceived control over ejaculation and at least a one‐category decrease in personal distress related to ejaculation from baseline at study endpoint.

RESULTS

At baseline, ≈5% of patients in any treatment group reported ‘not at all’ or ‘a little bit’ of personal distress related to ejaculation, which increased to 54.3% of those receiving dapoxetine (vs 35.3% with placebo; P < 0.001). Similarly, 43.0% and 40.9% of men in the placebo and dapoxetine groups, respectively, reported ‘not at all’ or ‘a little bit’ of interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation at baseline, which increased to 76.8% and 64.2% of those with dapoxetine and placebo, respectively (P < 0.001). The percentage of men who achieved the composite criteria with dapoxetine ‘as needed’ was 47.6%, vs 21.7% with placebo (difference from placebo, 25.9%; P < 0.001). The distribution of responses for the PEP among men who achieved the composite criteria was similar to that reported for men without PE in a previous observational study in the USA. The most common adverse events were nausea, dizziness, headache, diarrhoea and insomnia, which were more common with dapoxetine than with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Dapoxetine reduced the personal distress and interpersonal difficulty associated with PE, and was associated with patient‐reported improvements in their condition. The percentage of patients who achieved a composite of a two‐category or greater increase in perceived control over ejaculation and a one‐category or greater decrease in personal distress related to ejaculation was substantially greater than with placebo, as were all outcome measures.     

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of the on-demand use of sertraline,dapoxetine, and daily use of sertraline in the treatment of patients with lifelong premature ejaculation: A prospective randomised study

This study compared the safety and efficacy of the on-demand (OD) use of sertraline (50 mg), sertraline (100 mg) and dapoxetine (30 mg), and the daily use of sertraline (50 mg) in the treatment of patients with premature ejaculation (PE). This prospective randomised study involved 120 lifelong PE patients (intravaginal ejaculatory latency time [IELT]: <1 min; Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation [AIPE] score: < 30) without secondary causes of PE, identified between March 2018 and May 2020. Patients were divided into 4 groups (30 patients per group) and treated for 8 weeks. Assessments were conducted using the AIPE form as a diagnostic tool. Sertraline (50 mg, daily; 196.7 ± 115.5 s) and sertraline (100 mg, OD; 173.3 ± 97.0 s) had similar IELT and AIPE scores. The latter groups had better results in comparison with sertraline (50 mg, OD; 100.5 ± 54.4 s) and dapoxetine (93.7 ± 53.5 s; p < 0.01). Sertraline (100 mg, OD) had a similar efficacy to that of sertraline (50 mg, daily) and was more effective than sertraline (50 mg, OD) and dapoxetine (30 mg, OD). Sertraline (100 mg, OD) can be considered in the treatment of lifelong PE treatment, having tolerable side effects.     

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of the on‐demand use of paroxetine,dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation: A randomised placebo‐controlled clinical trial

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the on‐demand use of paroxetine, dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation (PE). In a single‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical study, 150 PE patients without erectile dysfunction (ED) were included during the period of March 2015 to May 2016. Patients were randomly divided into five groups (30 patients each). On demand placebo, paroxetine (30 mg), dapoxetine (30 mg), sildenafil citrate (50 mg) and combined dapoxetine (30 mg) with sildenafil citrate (50 mg) were given for patients for 6 weeks in each group respectively. All patients were instructed to record intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and evaluated with Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and the patient satisfaction score before and after treatment. The mean of IELT, satisfaction score and PEDT in all groups was significantly improved after treatment (p value = .001). Combined dapoxetine with sildenafil group had the best values of IELT, satisfaction scores and PEDT in comparison with other treatment groups (p value <.001). The combined dapoxetine with sildenafil therapy could significantly improve PE patients without ED as compared to paroxetine alone or dapoxetine alone or sildenafil alone with tolerated adverse effects.     

按需服用达泊西汀对早泄疗效的Meta分析

目的:评价按需服用达泊西汀对早泄的疗效,为临床决策提供依据。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、BIOSIS Previews、Cochrane Library、CNKI数据库、万方资源数据库有关按需服用达泊西汀治疗早泄的研究文献,并进行Meta分析;主要评价阴道内射精潜伏时间(intravaginal ejaculatory latency time,IELT)、患者总体感觉改善情况(patient-reported global impression of change,PGI)、综合临床受益(composite PRO criteria for clinical benefit,CCCB)3项结局指标。结果:检索出相关文献159篇,剔除142篇,共有4篇文献符合纳入标准,累计患者6 081例。Meta分析结果显示:与安慰剂相比,按需服用达泊西汀在IELT[WMD=1.39,95%CI(1.23,1.55),P<0.000 01],PGI[OR=2.59,95%CI(2.21,3.04),P<0.000 01],CCCB[OR=2.59,95%CI(1.98,3.39),P<0.00001]方面差异均有显著性意义;达泊西汀60 mg与30 mg治疗组间比较,60 mg组在IELT[WMD=0.46,95%CI(0.19,0.74),P=0.0010],PGI[OR=1.32,95%CI(1.06,1.64),P=0.01]方面差异有显著性意义,在CCCB[OR=1.39,95%CI(0.90,2.15),P=0.13]方面无显著性差异。结论:本研究表明按需服用达泊西汀60 mg及30 mg均能延长早泄患者IELT,提高其PGI及改善CCCB;其中60 mg较30 mg剂量在延长早泄患者IELT及提高PGI方面效果更佳。     

Perceived control over ejaculation is central to treatment benefit in men with premature ejaculation: results from phase III trials with dapoxetine

OBJECTIVES

To assess the utility of perceived control over ejaculation (‘control’) in the evaluation of treatment benefit in men with premature ejaculation (PE), and to compare effects associated with a two‐category or greater increase in this variable between men receiving dapoxetine and placebo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This subanalysis used combined data from all treatment groups in an integrated analysis of two identically designed, 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trials of dapoxetine. Men (2614) met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth edition, text revision) criteria for PE, had a stopwatch‐measured intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of ≤2 min in ≥75% of events in a 2‐week baseline period, and self‐reported moderate or severe PE. Men received placebo or dapoxetine 30 or 60 mg, 1–3 h before intercourse. The stopwatch‐measured IELT was recorded for each episode; the patient‐reported global impression of change (PGI; 7‐point scale, ‘much worse’ to ‘much better’), control and satisfaction with sexual intercourse (5‐point scales, ‘very poor’ to ‘very good’) were assessed monthly. The utility of a two‐category or greater increase in control was evaluated by examining the relationship of this variable with IELT and satisfaction with sexual intercourse.

RESULTS

Of 2341 men with baseline and endpoint assessments, 96.8% reported ‘very poor’ or ‘poor’ control at baseline, and 748 (32%) reported a two‐category or greater increase in control after treatment. More than 95% of those men rated their PE as ‘slightly better’, ‘better’, or ‘much better’ on the PGI; 67.1% gave ratings of ‘better’ or ‘much better.’ They also had greater improvements in IELT than men with less than a two‐category increase in control, with a mean (sd ) change from baseline of 3.7 (4.3) vs 0.77 (1.8) min, respectively, and a greater percentage reported good or very good satisfaction with sexual intercourse than men with less than a two‐category increase in control (74% vs 19%, respectively). Nausea, headache and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common adverse events reported by men with a two‐category or greater increase in control (15.8%, 7.4% and 6.6%, respectively) and those without (8.5%, 5.5% and 6.5%, respectively). The proportions of men with a two‐category or greater increase in control with dapoxetine 30 and 60 mg were 36.3% and 44.5%, respectively (vs 15% with placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

A two‐category or greater increase in control (5‐point scale) is useful for assessing the treatment benefit in men with PE; it corresponds with improvements in the man’s perception of his condition, substantially greater prolongation of IELT, and higher levels of satisfaction with sexual intercourse.     

Beneficial effect of tamsulosin combined with dapoxetine in management of type III prostatitis with premature ejaculation

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin combined with dapoxetine in the treatment of type IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) that is complicated by premature ejaculation (PE), a total of 251 CP/CPPS patients with PE were recruited from nine hospitals across China and were randomly divided into two groups: one received tamsulosin as a control, and the other received a combination therapy of tamsulosin and dapoxetine. Follow‐up was conducted at four time points, and indicators describing CP/CPPS and PE were compared between the two groups. In all, 223 patients were followed up at least once, and 114 patients completed all of the treatment process. The combination group showed more improvement in the symptoms of both PE and CP/CPPS, including thrust number (50.5 vs. 45), premature ejaculation profile score (11.39 vs. 6.96), intravaginal ejaculation latency time (5.95 min vs. 2.63 min) and the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (7.44 vs. 11.81) in comparison with the tamsulosin group. In conclusion, for CP/CPPS patients with PE, tamsulosin combined with dapoxetine provided better therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of not only PE symptoms but also CP/CPPS indicators in comparison with tamsulosin monotherapy.     

帕罗西汀与达帕西汀的对比，治疗早泄的新的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂

达帕西汀氢氯化物是一种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,也是第一种被批准可以按需服用治疗早泄的药物。本文目的为研究按需服用达帕西汀（30mg和H60mg）和每日服用帕罗西汀（20mg）对早泄的疗效。研究募集了150名患者进行了长达1个月的研究。患者被分成3组,每组50人。第一组按需服用达帕西汀30mg。第二组按需服用达帕西汀60mg。第三组每日服用帕罗西汀20mg。治疗结束后,我们的结果检测值相对于基准阴道内射精潜伏期（IELT）延长了。与基准IELT相比,帕罗西汀组、30mg达帕西汀组和60mg达帕西汀组的治疗后IELT分别延长了117％（P〈0．01）,117％（P〈0．01）和170％（P〈0．01）。30mg达帕西汀组和帕罗西汀组的IELT增幅相同（P〉0．05）,而60mg达帕西汀组的IELT增幅明显高于30mg达帕西汀组（P〈0．05和帕罗西汀组P〈0．01）。性交前1～3小时服用达帕西汀60mg是针对早泄的非常有效的治疗方法。然而,与当前普遍使用的帕罗西汀相比,达帕西汀30mg疗效并不显著。     

口服帕罗西汀治疗早泄的随机对照研究

目的:验证帕罗西汀对早泄的治疗效果。方法:将符合纳入标准的80例早泄患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组40例。所有患者进入为期4周的基线水平观察期,记录治疗前的阴道内射精潜伏时间(IELT)和性交满意度分值。试验组每天口服帕罗西汀20 mg,对照组口服安慰剂。治疗30 d后记录每个患者治疗后的IELT值和性交满意度分值。结果:试验组治疗后平均IELT与治疗前比较明显延长(5.75±1.24 min vs 0.89±0.21min,P<0.01),性交满意度与治疗前比较明显提高(6.4±1.2分vs 2.7±0.9分,P<0.01)。对照组治疗后平均IELT和性交满意度与治疗前比较均无显著性差异(1.06±0.28 min vs 0.97±0.18 min,3.6±1.3分vs 3.1±1.1分,P>0.05)。结论:早泄患者每天口服帕罗西汀20 mg,30 d后IELT和性交满意度均有明显改善。     

The effect of plasma melatonin levels in the treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

The aim of our study was to compare melatonin levels of patients with lifelong premature ejaculation (LPE) (n:60) with healthy controls (n:30) and to investigate the changes of melatonin levels in the treatment with dapoxetine and sertraline. Age, body mass index, duration of marriage, weekly intercourse number, International Index of Erectile Function scores, Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time (IELT) and melatonin levels were recorded. LPE patients were divided into two treatment groups. The first group was included 30 patients, who received 60 mg dapoxetine for six weeks, twice a week, an hour before intercourse. The second group received 50 mg of sertraline daily, for six weeks. IELT and melatonin measures were repeated after the treatment. IELT (dapoxetine group: 41.22 ± 21.3 s, sertraline group: 48 ± 23.11 s, control group: 195.54 ± 84.14 s; p < .001) and melatonin levels (dapoxetine group: 5.75 ± 2.04 pg/mL, sertraline group: 5.49 ± 2.88 pg/mL, control group: 13.4 ± 12.09 pg/mL; p < .001) of both LPE groups were significantly lower than control group. Following the six-week sertraline (before: 48 ± 23.11 s, after: 101.01 ± 59.55 s; p < .001) and dapoxetine (before: 41.22 ± 21.3 s, after: 97.39 ± 44.1 s; p < .001) treatments, IELT increased. The melatonin levels increased in the sertraline group (before: 5.49 ± 2.88 pg/mL, after: 10.6 ± 7.37 pg/mL; p < .001). Our results indicate that melatonin levels of LPE patients are lower than levels of healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we found a significant increase in melatonin levels following sertraline treatment.     

A comprehensive assessment of genetic variation in serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR+rs25531) and the response to dapoxetine in Chinese patients with premature ejaculation

This study was to explore whether serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR+rs25531) influence the response to dapoxetine treatment in a Chinese population with premature ejaculation (PE). 112 patients with PE re-enrolled from our previous study received dapoxetine monotherapy. At the endpoint, patients with S’S’ had a significant increased risk of nonresponse compared with L’ carriers (p < .001). The improvement in S’S’ genotype was significantly lower in premature ejaculation profile (PEP) items of ‘control over ejaculation’ (p = .035) and ‘distress related to ejaculation’ (p = .017) than that in L’ carriers. As to clinical global impression of change (CGIC), results in S’S’ subjects showed significantly lower scores (p = .008) and a less satisfaction rate reporting at least ‘better’ (p = .020) compared with L’ carriers. Moreover, our findings suggested that patients with S’S’ were more likely to develop adverse effects (AEs) compared with L’ carriers (p = .040). This study suggests that PE patients bearing the S’S’ genotype have an inferior comprehensive efficacy and safety of dapoxetine treatment, which consist of poorer response in IELTs, less improvement in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and greater incidence of AEs, than L’ carriers. Variants of triallelic 5-HTTLPR may play a major role as a predictor of treatment response to dapoxetine.     

Safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine,Qiaoshao formula,combined with dapoxetine in the treatment of premature ejaculation: An open-label,real-life,retrospective multicentre study in Chinese men

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Chinese medicine, Qiaoshao formula combined with dapoxetine was used for the treatment of premature ejaculation in a real-life setting. Nine hundred and five males diagnosed with premature ejaculation were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study. We divided the patients into two groups: dapoxetine alone and Qiaoshao formula combined with dapoxetine according to actual interventions provided to patients in clinics. The perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time and the premature ejaculation profile measures markedly improved in both groups. However, in men with severe premature ejaculation (baseline perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time <1 min) and those with baseline age ≤30 years, the perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time was slightly but significantly longer with combined therapy than with dapoxetine alone (p < .05). Therefore, combined therapy involving the Qiaoshao formula and dapoxetine proved to safe as well as effective for treating premature ejaculation while prolonging the perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time, which significantly improved the overall satisfaction of the patient and likely that of the couple.     

Impact of physical activity on patient self‐reported outcomes of lifelong premature ejaculation patients: Results of a prospective,randomised, sham‐controlled trial

Previous studies have investigated whether physical activity increases serotonin hormone levels. Serotonin receptor dysfunction is one of the frequently accused factors of premature ejaculation (PE). Nevertheless, no studies up to date have demonstrated that the association between physical activity and premature ejaculation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between physical activity and PE and determine whether moderate physical activity might delay ejaculation time or be an alternative treatment for PE. A total of 105 patients diagnosed with PE were enrolled in this study. Of the patients, 35 were treated with dapoxetine, (30 mg) on demand (Group 1), 35 performed moderate physical activities (Group 2), and 35 performed minimal physical activity (Group 3‐sham). Demographic characteristics, metabolic equivalents (MET), premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT) and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) were recorded. There were no significant differences among three groups in terms of age, BMI, MET, PEDT or IELT before treatment. At the end of the study, there was significant decrease in PEDT scores, and increase in IELT in groups 1 and 2 as compared to Group 3. In conclusion, a moderate physical activity longer than 30 min at least 5 times a week leads to ejaculation delay, and appears as an alternative to dapoxetine on demand for the treatment of PE.     

Efficacy and safety of daily use of tadalafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation: A randomised placebo‐controlled clinical trial

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the once‐daily use of 5 mg tadalafil in the treatment of patients with premature ejaculation (PE). In a single‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical study, it was carried out on 100 patients with PE. All patients were randomised equally divided into two groups (50 patients each). Group 1 was given placebo in the form of oral multivitamin tablet once a day for 6 weeks. Group 2 was given 5 mg tadalafil once a day for 6 weeks. All patients were asked to complete Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation (AIPE) before and after the treatment. This study showed that there were no statistically significant differences between patients in the placebo and tadalafil groups regarding the mean values of the seven questions and total scores of the AIPE questionnaire before treatment (p value >.05). The mean values of the seven questions and total scores of AIPE questionnaire in the tadalafil group were significantly higher than the placebo group after treatment (p value = .001). This study concluded that once‐daily use of 5 mg tadalafil for 6 weeks was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with PE.     

The efficacy of regular penis-root masturbation,versus Kegel exercise in the treatment of primary premature ejaculation: A quasi-randomised controlled trial

To explore the efficacy of regular penis-root masturbation (PRM) versus Kegel exercise (KE) in the treatment of primary premature ejaculation (PPE). This study was a prospective quasi-randomised controlled trial. Thirty-seven heterosexual males with PPE were selected according to the time sequence of outpatient consultations and the preliminary results of a pre-experiment and were assigned to an PRM group and a KE group. Differences in intravaginal ejaculatory latency times (IELTs) and premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT) scores were compared between the two groups. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Among the 37 PPE patients, 18 performed PRM and 19 patients performed KE. The IELTs of patients who performed PRM and KE were significantly prolonged before treatment, and the difference after treatment was statistically significant (p < .05). Compared with the KE group, the IELT prolongation effect in the PRM group was more significant PRM (p < .05). The PEDT scores of patients after performing PRM and KE were significantly lower than those before performing these exercises (p < .05). Compared with the KE group, the PEDT scores of the PRM group exhibited a greater decrease (p < .05). Thus, both PRM and KE have therapeutic effects on PPE. Compared with KE, PRM is more effective in the treatment of PPE.     

Topical anaesthetic use for treating premature ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of a topical anaesthetic mixture to improve premature ejaculation (PE), for which penile hypersensitivity might be a cause. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 42 men divided in two groups; group A used a lidocaine-prilocaine solution and group B used an inert cream. The tubes of cream were distributed randomly and participants asked to note any unpleasant symptoms, difficulties and the results of each attempt at intercourse, assessed by the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the mean (sd) IELT, from 1.49 (0.9) to 8.45 (0.9) min (P < 0.001) in group A but not in group B, at 1.67 (0.7) to 1.95 (0.12) min (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We suggest that anaesthetic cream might be effective for treating PE.     

帕罗西汀与氯丙咪嗪治疗早泄的临床对照研究

目的：研究氯丙咪嗪与帕罗西汀治疗早泄的疗效和副作用。方法：选择先例DSM-Ⅳ上泄诊断标准的病人80名，随机分为帕罗西汀和氯丙咪嗪两个治疗组，病人每天服用帕罗西汀20mg或氯丙咪嗪30mg，4周后用自行编制的问卷评价治疗结果。结果：帕罗西汀组有5个病人脱落，氯丙咪嗪组脱落7个，两组之间在疗效和起效时间方面没有明显差异，氯丙咪嗪组副作用略多于帕罗西汀组。结论：两种药都可以用于治疗早泄，鉴于大剂量服用氯丙咪嗪有一定危险性，建议由有经验的医生使用。     

Current therapeutic strategies for premature ejaculation and future perspectives

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common sexual disorder in men that is mediated by disturbances in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Although all pharmaceutical treatments for PE are currently used 'off-label', some novel oral agents and some newer methods of drug administration now provide important relief to PE patients. However, the aetiology of this condition has still not been unified, primarily because of the lack of a standard animal model for basic research and the absence of a widely accepted definition and assessment tool for evidence-based clinical studies in patients with PE. In this review, we focus on the current therapeutic strategies and future treatment perspectives for PE.