Impact of hepatitis B and C on graft loss and mortality of patients after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mortality or graft loss after renal transplantation might be influenced by hepatitis virus infection. METHODS: Sera from time of transplantation of 927 renal transplant recipients were tested for hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) in order to investigate the impact of hepatitis virus infection on graft loss and mortality over an observation period of 20 yr. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty three of 927 patients were HCV positive, 30 patients HBV positive and seven patients HBV and HCV positive. The observation period was 9.2 +/- 4.4 yr. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with hepatitis B (p = 0.0005), as well as in patients with concomitant B and C hepatitis (p < 0.0001) and in those who acquired HCV infection after transplantation (n = 30, p = 0.0192) compared with non-infected patients. Patients with replicating HBV infection (HBeAg positive) had the worst prognosis (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis the presence of HBeAg (p < 0.0001), patients' age (p < 0.0001) and HCV infection after transplantation (p = 0.0453) were predictors for death. Graft survival was significantly shorter in patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C (p = 0.0087) as well as in HBeAg positive patients (p = 0.002). HCV infection or HBs antigenemia did not have a significant impact on graft survival compared with non-infected patients. CONCLUSION: HCV infection after transplantation is associated with a high mortality whereas chronic HCV infection before trans plantation does not have a significant impact on mortality. Patients with replicating HBV infection or concomitant HBV and HCV infection have a high risk of graft loss and mortality.     

Use of telbivudine in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A preliminary experience

Telbivudine is a relatively novel oral nucleoside analogue with favourable efficacy and tolerability in treatment‐naïve chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but its data in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was lacking. The efficacy and tolerability of telbivudine in four treatment‐naïve HBsAg‐positive KTRs were reviewed (treatment duration 54 (36–72) months) HBV DNA declined from 2.6 × 10⁵(7.8 × 10³–1.5 × 10⁷) copies/mL at baseline to 170 (0.0–3.2 × 10⁴) copies/mL at 12 months, and became undetectable at 24 and 36 months (P = 0.060, 0.118 and 0.005 compared with baseline). Alanine aminotransferase levels dropped from 46.5 (30–48) IU/mL at baseline to 28 (13–45) IU/mL, 34.5 (15–71) IU/mL and 26 (12–41) IU/mL at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively (P = 0.109, 0.715 and 0.068 compared with baseline). Serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable after 36 months of treatment (P all > 0.05 compared with baseline). No virological breakthrough, cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma occurred. Our pilot data suggests that telbivudine has favourable efficacy and renal safety profiles in HBsAg‐positive KTRs.     

Entecavir treatment in kidney transplant recipients infected with hepatitis B

Although nucleotide/side analogs improve the clinical outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen‐positive (HBsAg+) kidney transplant recipients (KTR), a significant proportion of subjects have developed resistance to lamivudine (LAM). We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of entecavir (ETV) in HBsAg+ KTR at Queen Mary Hospital during 2005–2013. Twenty‐one patients (10 treatment‐naïve, 11 with LAM resistance) were included (duration of ETV treatment 34.7 ± 22.9 months, range 6–75 months). ETV treatment led to a decline of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titer compared to baseline and is more significant in the treatment‐naïve group (treatment‐naïve: p = 0.028, <0.001 and <0.001; LAM‐resistant p = 0.273, 0.180, and 0.109 after 12, 24, and 36 months). The cumulative rate of HBV DNA undetectability at 12, 24, and 36 months was 60%, 100%, and 100% for treatment‐naïve group, and 27%, 45%, and 45% for LAM‐resistant group, respectively. Time‐to‐HBV DNA undetectability and time‐to‐alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization were 15.7 ± 4.6 and 12.6 ± 3.7 months for treatment‐naïve patients, and 24.5 ± 4.2 and 28.2 ± 3.5 months for those with LAM resistance. Genotypic resistance to ETV emerged after 20.0 ± 3.5 months with increase in ALT and HBV DNA in two patients with LAM resistance, but was not observed in the treatment‐naïve group. Allograft dysfunction, de novo cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma did not occur during follow‐up.     

Liver,simultaneous liver-kidney,and kidney transplantation from hepatitis C-positive donors in hepatitis C-negative recipients: A single-center study

Transplantation of organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-antibody (Ab) and -nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors into HCV-negative recipients has been proposed to expand the donor pool and shorten waiting times. Data on early single-center outcomes are lacking. Nineteen liver (LT, including seven simultaneous liver-kidney [SLKT]) and 17 kidney transplant (KT) recipients received organs from HCV (+) donors; of these, 13 were HCV NAT (+) in each group. All patients who received organs from HCV NAT (+) donors developed HCV viremia post-transplant except for 2 KT recipients. Patients were treated with a variety of direct-acting antiviral regimens, with high rates of sustained virologic response among those with at least 12 weeks of follow-up past the end of treatment: 12/13 (92%) and 8/8 (100%) among LT/SLKT, and KT recipients. Median time to treatment start was 42 days (interquartile range [IQR] 35-118 days) and 40 days (IQR 26-73) post-LT/SLKT and KT, respectively. One death occurred in a SLKT recipient unrelated to HCV or its treatment. There was no significant increase in rejection, proteinuria, or changes in immunosuppression in any group. Organs from HCV-viremic donors can be utilized for HCV-uninfected recipients with good short-term outcomes.     

Safety of using hepatitis B virus core antibody or surface antigen-positive donors in kidney or pancreas transplantation

Hepatitis B virus core antibody (HBcAb) or surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive organ donors have the potential to transmit infection to transplant recipients. We investigated the safety of using HBcAb(+) or HBsAg(+) donors in kidney or pancreas transplant recipients with 1 yr lamivudine prophylaxis. While HBsAb(-) recipients of HBcAb(+) donors received prophylaxis, HBsAb(+) recipients did not. HBsAg(+) organs were only used in patients who were both HBcAb and HBsAb(+). Forty-six patients received HBcAb(+) and four received HBsAg(+) organs (47 kidney, two pancreas, and one kidney/pancreas). All but one recipient were HBsAg(-), 25 were HBsAb(+), and 19 HBcAb(+). During a median 36 months of follow-up (range 6-66 months), with 43 of a total 50 patients having at least 1 yr follow-up and were off lamivudine, and none of the patients developed hepatitis B viremia or seroconversion to HBsAg or HBsAb(+). These results suggest that HBcAb(+) or HBsAg(+) organs can be used safely in selected recipients with lamivudine prophylaxis without requiring hepatitis B immunglobulin.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. Of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P =0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

SUMMARY: The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P = 0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

Ribavirin therapy for hepatitis C infection following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C infection following orthotopic liver transplantation may lead to progressive chronic graft dysfunction. In this study, seven liver transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction due to hepatitis C infection (one acquired and six recurrent infections) were treated with oral ribavirin for 6 months. Symptoms of lethargy, nausea and anorexia improved in all patients within 2 weeks of starting the drug, with a fall in serum AST of at least 40% by this time. Ribavirin-induced haemolysis was clinically significant in three patients, necessitating a reduction in the daily dose of ribavirin from 1.2 g to 0.2 g. Comparison of the pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens in the four patients who tolerated the full dose of ribavirin and who had normal AST levels at the end of 6 months of treatment showed significant histological improvement with reduction in either lobular or periportal inflammation in all of the patients and a reduction in periportal fibrosis in one patient. HCV RNA remained detectable in serum in all of the patients at the end of the study.     

Chronic liver disease in kidney recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive test is higher among patients in dialysis and in kidney recipients than in general population. Hepatitis C virus infection is the main cause of chronic liver disease in renal transplant patients. Liver biopsy and virological analysis were performed to clarify the grade of liver damage in kidney recipients. METHODS: Renal recipients patients with at least 5 yr under immunosuppression were submitted to clinical and laboratory analysis. Patients who tested anti-HCV positive were candidates to liver biopsy with no regard to transaminase levels. RESULTS: Forty-five patients tested anti-HCV positive and 42 anti-HCV negative. Twenty-six anti-HCV and RNA-HCV positive patients were submitted to liver biopsy. Seventy-three percentage of these patients presented chronic active hepatitis, from these only one patient presented cirrhosis. Only 29% of the anti-HCV positive group presented elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Anti-HCV positive patients presented longer previous time on dialysis and less rejection episodes than the group anti-HCV negative (p < 0.05). All anti-HCV positive patients but one tested RNA-HCV positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). CONCLUSIONS: In this series the prevalence of anti-HCV positive is 51.7%. Most of the patients presented liver damage in histology caused by HCV. However, we found only mild or minimal fibrosis and inflammatory activity grade, despite 10 yr of HCV infection and 5 yr of immunosuppressive treatment. Only one patient presented cirrhosis (4%). Performing serial liver biopsies in a long-term follow-up is needed to clarify the impact of HCV infection in renal transplant patients.     

Rapid steroid withdrawal in hepatitis C virus-positive kidney transplant recipients

The effects of rapid steroid withdrawal (SW) on kidney transplantation (KT) outcome were investigated in 12 HCV+ patients in a prospective cohort study. These results were compared with 17 HCV+ patients who received KT in the prior 2 yr and treated with a standard prednisone taper protocol. SW patients received only 6 d of steroid treatment after transplantation. Eleven received Thymoglobulin and one Basiliximab induction treatment along with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil. Patient and graft survival was 92% in SW group (median follow-up 12 months, range 6-17), and 92 and 82% in the historic control group respectively (median follow-up 21 months, range 11-27). In the SW and control group, acute rejection rates were 9 and 18%, and mean creatinine levels at last follow-up 1.30 +/- 0.36 and 1.68 +/- 0.58 mg/dL respectively. Only two SW patients had an increase in liver function tests during follow-up (18%), compared with six patients in the control group (43%). This study demonstrates that rapid SW is safe for HCV+ KT recipients, without an increase in acute rejection episodes or liver function abnormalities in the short term.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: relationship with donor age and fibrosis progression

Abstract:  Liver transplantation (OLT) recipients who receive a graft from donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) anti-core antibodies may develop overt " de novo " HBV infection. The study was undertaken to explore how often HBV infection may remain occult after OLT for hepatitis C, and whether it may represent a factor of graft fibrosis progression. We studied 30 consecutive patients transplanted for hepatitis C liver disease. Specimens from the native liver and from the graft were searched for occult HBV infection (O-HBV). In the native liver, 8/30 patients had detectable O-HBV; during the follow-up, O-HBV infection was demonstrated in 14 graft specimens. Graft O-HBV was associated with older donor age (≥50 yr; 8/9 vs. 6/21, p < 0.005). Recipients with graft O-HBV and no O-HBV in the native liver who received their grafts from donors aged >40 yr had faster fibrosis progression than recipients with no post-transplant O-HBV, whose grafts came from donors aged >40 yr and recipients whose grafts came from donors aged ≤40 yr (4/7 vs. 1/7 vs. 2/16, p < 0.05). In OLT recipients, O-HBV is more likely to occur when grafts are obtained from aged donors and may affect the rate of fibrosis progression because of recurrent hepatitis C.     

CMV specific T cell immune response in hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients receiving transplant from hepatitis C viremic donors and hepatitis C aviremic donors

Kidney transplants (KT) from hepatitis C (HCV) viremic donors to HCV negative recipients has shown promising renal outcomes, however, high incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia were reported. We performed a prospective cohort study of 52 HCV negative KT recipients from Methodist University Hospital including 41 receiving transplants from HCV aviremic donors and 11 from HCV viremic donors. CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immunity was measured by intracellular flow cytometry assay. Primary outcome was the development of positive CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response in the entire cohort and each subgroup. The association between donor HCV status and CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models. Mean recipient age was 48 ± 13 years, with 73% male and 82% African American. Positive CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response was found in 53% and 47% of the cohort at 1 month, 65% and 70% at 2 months, 80% and 75% at 4 months, 89% and 87% at 6 months, and 94% and 94% at 9 months post-transplant, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of positive CMV specific T cell immune response between recipients of transplants from HCV aviremic donors compared to HCV viremic donors in unadjusted (for CD8+: HR = 1.169, 95%CI: 0.521–2.623; for CD4+: HR = 1.208, 95%CI: 0.543–2.689) and adjusted (for CD8+: HR = 1.072, 95%CI: 0.458–2.507; for CD4+: HR = 1.210, 95%CI: 0.526–2.784) Cox regression analyses. HCV viremia in donors was not associated with impaired development of CMV specific T cell immunity in this cohort.     

Incidence and outcome of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (OLT). Fifty-two transplanted patients were studied. Serum samples were examined for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) and HCV-RNA by PCR, before and after OLT. Patients were distributed into two groups: group 1 consisted of 24 patients (pretransplant anti-HCV positive) and group 2 consisted of 28 patients (pretransplant anti-HCV negative). One year after OLT, HCV-infected patients were evaluated by liver biopsy. HCV-RNA was detected in 28 of the 52 (53.9%) patients after OLT. Twenty-two patients in group 1 (96%) were reinfected. In group 2, acquired HCV infection was detected in six (21.4%) patients. At 6 and 12 months, one and five of six patients had seroconverted, respectively. Liver biopsy in 23 HCV-infected patients showed chronic hepatitis in 18 (78%) cases (2, chronic persistent hepatitis; 3, chronic lobular hepatitis and 13, chronic active hepatitis). Fourteen of the 23 (60.8 %) patients were asymptomatic. Most symptomatic patients had chronic hepatitis with cholestasis. Overall, 18 of 20 cases of chronic hepatitis diagnosed in OLT recipients were HCV related. Mortality beyond 6 months after OLT was slightly higher in the HCV-infected group ( P = 0.055). In conclusion, HCV reinfection is almost universal. Acquired HCV infection post-OLT is frequent. HCV-infected patients frequently develop chronic hepatitis. Most chronic hepatitis after transplantation are HCV related.     

Impaired kidney transplant survival in patients with antibodies to hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: With a few exceptions, most published studies do not show an influence of antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) on the success of a kidney transplant. METHODS: We studied all our renal transplant recipients who had received kidneys from cadaver donors (n = 335) and had been treated with quadruple immunosuppression (steroids, azathioprine, and antilymphocyte antibodies, followed by cyclosporin). We had information on the status of the hepatitis C antibodies before and/or after the transplant in 320 cases (95.5%; in 300, pre-transplant). Patients with HCV antibodies before and/or after the transplant were considered to be HCV positive (HCV+). RESULTS: The HCV+ patients had more time in dialysis and a greater number of transfusions, hyperimmunized cases, and re-transplants. The evolution in the first post-transplant year was similar in both groups, but afterwards, the HCV+ patients had proteinuria more often as well as worse kidney function. The survival rate of the graft was significantly less in the HCV+ cases: 90.6, 68.3 and 51.0% at respectively 1, 5 and 10 years, compared with 91.5, 84.7 and 66.5% in HCV-patients (P<0.01). The patient survival rate was: 96.4, 87.0, and 71.9% in the HCV+ patients at 1, 5, and 10 years, compared with 98.2, 96.0 and 90.0% in the HCV- cases respectively (P<0.01). The differences remained the same in stratified studies according to time spent in dialysis or pre/post-transplant evolution of HCV antibodies, even when immunologically high-risk patients were excluded. In multivariant analysis, the presence of HCV antibodies acted as a independent prognostic factor for the survival of the kidney and the patient: 3.0 (1.8-5.0) and 3.1 (1.2-7.8) odds-ratio (95% of the confidence interval), respectively. The main cause of death among HCV+ patients was cardiovascular; there was no apparent increase in mortality rate due to infections or chronic liver disease. The loss of organs was mainly due to chronic nephropathy or death with a functioning kidney. CONCLUSION: The presence of hepatitis C antibodies, before or after transplantation, is associated with a worse long-term survival rate for both the patient and the transplanted kidney in our patients treated with quadruple therapy.     

Prevention of de novo hepatitis B virus infection in living donor liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody positive donors

Exclusion of liver grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive donors to prevent de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation is not feasible in areas highly endemic for HBV virus like Taiwan, where approximately 80% of adults are anti-HBc(+). The efficacy of lamivudine monotherapy to prevent de novo HBV infection after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors remains to be elucidated. From June 1994 to August 2000, LDLT was performed in 42 recipients. Twenty-four of the 42 donors were anti-HBc(+) (57%). Pre-transplant HBV vaccination was given to all recipients irrespective of anti-HBc status at monthly intervals for 3 months. Until December 1997, eight recipients received liver grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors without prophylaxis. Since January 1998, prophylaxis with lamivudine monotherapy was given to 16 recipients receiving liver grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors. De novo HBV infection occurred in three of the eight recipients (37.5%) who did not receive prophylaxis, while none of the 16 recipients given lamivudine developed de novo HBV infection after a mean follow-up of 25 months. Two of the three recipients with de novo HBV infection were anti-HBs(-) and one recipient was anti-HBs(+). Lamivudine was well tolerated, and no side effects were noted. These results suggest that lamivudine monotherapy for recipients receiving anti-HBc(+) liver grafts is a simple, relatively inexpensive and effective prophylactic regimen for prevention of de novo HBV infection. The additive protection provided by vaccine-induced or natural immunity is uncertain.     

丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植患者免疫功能的影响

目的　探讨丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV)感染对肾移植患者免疫功能的影响。方法　提取患者外周血的淋巴细胞 ,应用碱性磷酸酶 抗碱性磷酸酶 (APAAP)酶桥联法检测CD3 、CD4 、CD8 及CD16 细胞 ;免疫沉淀法测定血清中免疫球蛋白和补体水平。结果　HCV IgG和 /或HCVRNA阳性者 (HCV阳性组 )CD4 /CD8 值为 0 .90± 0 .2 5 ,显著低于HCV阴性组的 1.46± 0 .5 4(P <0 .0 5 ) ,主要是CD4 细胞下降显著 ;HCV阳性组CD16 细胞高达 2 7.8% ,与HCV阴性组比较 ,差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。HCV阳性组和阴性组的血清各免疫球蛋白和补体的差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论　HCV阳性的肾移植患者其免疫功能紊乱。     

Prevalence,incidence, and risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients

1. Download high-res image (432KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Long‐term outcome of patients with lamivudine after early cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin for prevention of recurrent hepatitis B following liver transplantation

Yuefeng M, Weili F, Wengxiang T, Ligang X, Guiling L, Hongwei G, Wencai L, Xiaoguang W, Wei M, Zhongyi F. Long‐term outcome of patients with lamivudine after early cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin for prevention of recurrent hepatitis B following liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 517–522. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of long‐term prophylaxis with lamivudine (LAM) after a course of post‐operative hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related disease. Result: The medical records of HBV‐infected patients who underwent a LT in our institution between July 2001 and May 2005 were reviewed. There were 15 liver transplant recipients who were administered HBIG for <18 months and used LAM as a maintenance prophylaxis regime enrolled in this study. At enrollment, all patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and three patients were HBeAg positive. There were 13 patients who were HBV DNA positive with a mean viral load of 5.4 log copies/mL, and among them, 12 recipients were on antiviral therapy with LAM (100 mg/d orally) for 12–168 d, resulting in HBV DNA negative levels in nine patients prior to their transplant. HBV recurrence post‐LT was noted in two patients who had very high‐HBV DNA levels pre‐LT. Both of these patients showed LAM‐resistant mutation at the time of recurrence. The 11 patients who were HBV DNA negative before LT (low‐risk patients) had no HBV recurrence during a follow‐up at a median of 58 months post‐LT. This included five patients who had intermittent low‐level HBV DNA post‐LT (HBsAg negative), of whom two had YMDD mutation and these two were given adefovir in addition to LAM. Conclusion: Our retrospective study demonstrated excellent long‐term outcomes in the low‐risk patients treated with LAM after a short course of HBIG.