What are Current Preprocedure Imaging Requirements for Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy: Have Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomographic Angiography Made a Difference?

Determination of degree of carotid artery stenosis is of critical importance when deciding whether a patient warrants surgical intervention. While angiography is still considered by some to be the true reference standard for imaging the internal carotid artery (ICA), physicians rely most commonly on duplex imaging when planning for endarterectomy. It is noninvasive, safe, and overall reliable for grading stenosis but is nevertheless user-dependent and can be limited in cases of severe calcification. Moreover, a lack of consensus for duplex criteria can be confounding. In recent years, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) have assumed a more prominent role in the preoperative planning for treatment of carotid stenosis. Improved resolution and faster acquisition times for both of these imaging modalities have allowed for accurate depictions of degree of stenosis, as well as plaque characterization. CTA and MRA may have special relevance in the era of carotid stenting, since challenging arch anatomy and identification of a high-risk vulnerable plaque may be useful when deciding whether to perform a stent procedure or endarterectomy.     

One patent intracranial collateral predicts tolerance of flow reversal during carotid angioplasty and stenting

Internal carotid artery (ICA) flow reversal is an effective means of cerebral protection during carotid stenting. Its main limitation is that in the absence of adequate collateral flow it may not be tolerated by the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative identification of intracranial collaterals with computerized tomographic (CTA) or magnetic resonance (MRA) angiography can predict adequate collateral flow and neurological tolerance of ICA flow reversal for embolic protection. This was a study of patients undergoing transcervical carotid angioplasty and stenting. Neuroprotection was established by ICA flow reversal. All patients underwent preoperative cervical and cerebral noninvasive angiography with CTA or MRA and had at least one patent intracranial collateral. Mean carotid artery back pressure was measured. Neurological changes during carotid clamping and flow reversal were continuously monitored with electroencephalography (EEG). Thirty-seven patients with at least one patent intracranial collateral on brain imaging with CTA or MRA were included. Mean carotid artery back pressure was 58 mm Hg. All procedures were technically successful. No EEG changes were present with common carotid artery occlusion and ICA flow reversal. One patent intracranial collateral provides sufficient cerebral perfusion to perform carotid occlusion and flow reversal with absence of EEG changes. Continued progress in noninvasive imaging modalities is becoming increasingly helpful in our understanding of cerebral physiology and selection of patients for invasive carotid procedures.     

Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for categorizing the severity of carotid disease relative to duplex ultrasound scan and cerebral contrast arteriography (CA) to determine if MRA imaging could replace the need for cerebral angiography in cases of indeterminate or inadequate duplex scan imaging. METHODS: Seventy-four carotid bifurcations in 40 patients undergoing 45 carotid endarterectomies from 1996 to 1998 were imaged with duplex ultrasound scan; MRA (two-dimensional neck and three-dimensional intracranial, time-of-flight technique); and biplanar, digital subtraction cerebral arteriography. Studies were blindly reviewed by one reader who used established threshold velocity criteria for the duplex scan and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method for MRA and CA to determine the percentage of diameter reduction of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Disease severity was grouped into four categories (< 50%, 50%-74%, 75%-99% stenosis and occlusion), and the results of MRA and duplex ultrasound scan were compared with CA. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detection of > 50% ICA stenosis were 100%, 96%, 98%, and 100% for MRA and 100%, 72%, 88%, and 100% for duplex ultrasound scan, respectively; similarly, for detection of > 75% ICA stenosis values were 100%, 77%, 76%, and 100% for MRA and 90%, 74%, 72%, and 91% for duplex ultrasound scan, respectively. Both MRA and duplex ultrasound scan accurately differentiated all cases of > 95% stenosis (n = 7) from occlusion (n = 4). Short length ICA flow gaps were present on MRA in all cases of 75% to 99% stenosis and one half of cases of CA-defined 50% to 74% stenosis. In patients with 50% to 74% stenosis, the mean angiographic stenosis was significantly greater when a flow gap was present on MRA (64% +/- 6%) versus no flow gap (57% +/- 7%) (P =.04). There was overall agreement among duplex ultrasound scan, MRA, and CA in 73% of carotids imaged. Of the 24% discordant results between MRA and duplex ultrasound scan, MRA correctly predicted disease severity in all cases, and inaccurate duplex ultrasound scan results were due to overestimation in 83% of cases. The operative plan was altered by CA findings in only one patient (2%) after duplex ultrasound scan and MRA. CONCLUSIONS: MRA can accurately categorize the severity of carotid occlusive disease. Duplex ultrasound scan facilitates patient selection for carotid endarterectomy in most cases, but adjunct use of MRA improves diagnostic accuracy for > 75% stenoses and may obviate the need for cerebral arteriography when duplex scan results are inconclusive or demonstrate borderline disease severity.     

Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis

Purpose: To determine the utility and accuracy of helical CT angiography (CTA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Methods: A comparison of CTA and conventional arteriogram was performed in 53 patients undergoing evaluation for carotid artery stenosis. Ninety-six carotid systems were evaluable. CTA stenosis was determined by the percent of area reduction seen on axial images through the level of greatest narrowing. MIP images were used to identify the point of maximal stenosis and to visualize overall vascular anatomy. The percent diameter stenosis was measured on conventional arteriograms using strict North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. Results: Significant correlation was found between CTA and arteriography (NASCET method R = 0.87, ECST method R = 0.87, p < 0.001). Using NASCET >60% as an indicator for disease, CTA had a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 90%, accuracy of 89%, negative predictive value of 88%, and positive predictive value of 89%. CTA identified plaque characteristics such as ulcerations (8), occlusion (10), fatty plaques (22), calcifications (48), and fibrosis (2). CTA underestimated 2 cases of short segment stenoses because of volume averaging, but this discrepancy was detected by duplex scan. No complications or renal dysfunction occurred with CTA; 1 patient became symptomatic during arteriography, necessitating termination of the procedure. Conclusion: CTA is a safe, non-invasive technique that precisely measures carotid artery area reduction and highly correlates to conventional arteriography. With this new technology, the current standards for carotid artery imaging may need to be reevaluated, and the precise role for helical CTA more clearly defined. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:290-300.)     

Screening and preoperative imaging of candidates for carotid endarterectomy

Randomized clinical trials have provided us with clinical guidelines regarding the indications for performing carotid endarterectomy in patients who have symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Logically, any patient with a history of transient ischemic attacks, amaurosis fugax, or stroke should be evaluated for extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease. In asymptomatic patients, however, carotid artery surveillance may be helpful in identifying those at risk before neurological events. Patients at particularly high risk include those identified with (1) manifestations of systemic atherosclerotic disease (peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, renovascular disease); (2) presence of a carotid bruit; (3) advanced age (> 65 years); and (4) ABI less than 0.7. Duplex ultrasonography remains the best and most widely used noninvasive screening method, but its accuracy is highly technologist dependent. A high-quality duplex study may, in itself, be adequate to determine whether the severity of extracranial carotid occlusive disease warrants surgical intervention. Catheter-based arteriography may be used as an adjunct to validate duplex results, but its invasive nature and risk of complications has popularized alternative imaging methods. Of these, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) show excellent promise as noninvasive imaging techniques for the evaluation of extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease.     

The relative contributions of carotid duplex scanning,magnetic resonance angiography,and cerebral arteriography to clinical decisionmaking: A prospective study in patients with carotid occlusive disease

Purpose: Recent reports suggest that 80% to 90% of patients can safely undergo carotid endarterectomy on the basis of duplex scanning alone without cerebral angiography. Other investigators have recommended that a complementary imaging study such as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) also be obtained.Methods: We prospectively evaluated 103 consecutive patients with carotid occlusive disease. Eighty percent of patients were symptomatic. All 103 patients underwent duplex scanning and arteriography. Additional noninvasive tests included computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and MRA in 50%, 56%, and 48% of patients, respectively. At a multispecialty conference all studies except angiograms were reviewed, and a treatment decision was made by a panel of attending vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and neurologists. The cerebral angiograms then were reviewed and changes made to final treatment plans were noted.Results: After review of noninvasive studies, 30 of 103 of patients (29%) were believed to require arteriography because of diagnostic uncertainty of carotid occlusion in three patients, suggestion of nonatherosclerotic disease in four, suggestion of proximal disease in two, suboptimal noninvasive studies in one, and uncertainty of therapy despite good-quality noninvasive studies in 20 patients primarily with borderline stenoses and unclear symptoms. In 10 of these 30 patients (33%) management decisions were changed on the basis of angiogram results. Of the remaining 73 patients (71%) in whom the panel felt comfortable proceeding with operative or medical therapy without angiography, only one patient (1.4%) would have had management altered by results of angiography. MRA results concurred with duplex findings in 92% of studies, but did not alter management in any patient.Conclusions: In patients with good-quality duplex images, focal atherosclerotic bifurcation disease, and clear clinical presentation, treatment decisions can be made without arteriography. In 30% of patients angiography is useful in clarifying decisionmaking. MRA is unlikely to influence management decisions and is thus rarely indicated. (J Vasc Surg 1996;23:950-6.)     

Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis

BACKGROUND: Duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are becoming competitive alternatives to angiography for determining the degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Varying reports have been published regarding the suitability of each technique for grading ICA disease. This retrospective study compared the merits of these three modalities for measuring ICA stenosis. METHODS: One hundred and eleven patients being considered for carotid endarterectomy underwent intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) via arch injection. Duplex imaging was performed in all patients and MRA in 50. The degree of carotid stenosis estimated by the three modalities was compared. RESULTS: There was good correlation between subjectively graded MRA and DSA images (r = 0.87, P < 0.001, n = 82 carotids) but poor correlation for objective estimates. MRA tended to underestimate the degree of stenosis (bias - 4.5 per cent) compared with DSA, but showed good correlation with duplex ultrasonography estimates (r = 0. 86, P < 0.001, n = 87 carotids). Both non-invasive modalities produced high values of sensitivity and specificity in estimating stenoses of greater than 70 per cent. MRA was less sensitive for distinguishing between severe stenosis and complete occlusion. CONCLUSION: This study did not resolve the debate regarding the method of choice as both MRA and duplex ultrasonography were accurate for imaging carotid stenoses.     

Magnetic resonance angiographic occlusion of the cervical carotid artery at 3 tesla: its pitfalls

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is one of the most popular tools for imaging cerebral arteries. However, it may overestimate steno-occlusive lesions. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of cervical MRA for carotid steno-occlusive lesions. This study included 13 sides of 12 patients (male: female = 11: 1, 53-83 years old) who showed cervical carotid occlusion on MRA at 3 tesla. The MRA was performed along with time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) and/or black blood imaging (BBI) when detailed evaluation was considered necessary after routine 1.5 tesla MRA. All patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for definitive diagnosis. Cervical duplex scan was also performed in 12 sides. DSA demonstrated occlusion in only 6 sides (46.2%). In the remaining 7 sides, in spite of occlusion on MRA, DSA demonstrated stenoses in 4 sides and pseudoocclusions in 3 sides. Adding TRICKS or BBI resulted in correct diagnosis (same as DSA) in 6 sides. In comparison to DSA, sensitivity and specificity of combination of TRICKS and BBI were 100% and 85.7%, respectively, for the diagnosis of cervical carotid occlusion. In conclusion, MRA alone does not accurately demonstrate severe stenosis of the cervical carotid artery and may miss surgical candidates. TRICKS and BBI are useful adjunct tools for an accurate diagnosis.     

Computed tomography angiography validates duplex sonographic evaluation of carotid artery stenosis

Controversy regarding the optimal preoperative evaluation for patients with carotid arterial stenosis remains controversial. We hypothesized that carotid artery area reduction measured by computed tomography angiography (CTA) would closely correlate with duplex scanning stenosis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the correlation between duplex, CTA, and conventional arteriography in patients undergoing consideration for carotid endarterectomy. Patients undergoing evaluation for carotid artery stenosis who received at least 2 of the diagnostic tests were included in this study (n = 108); 30 patients underwent all 3 imaging modalities. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine correlation coefficients between the 3 different study modalities. Correlation and P values were as follows: CTA area versus CTA diameter, r = 0.82, P < 0.001; CTA area versus duplex stenosis, r = 0.71, P < 0.001; duplex stenosis versus angio diameter, r = 0.68; P = 0.005; CTA diameter versus angio diameter, r = 0.61, P = 005. CTA was able to identify plaque characteristics more readily than duplex or arteriography. CTA was also able to differentiate critical stenosis from occlusion and to settle discrepancies obtained from duplex scanning. CTA is an acceptable alternative method to validate duplex scanning evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. It can accurately measure lumen stenosis, visualize plaque morphology, and is associated with fewer complications than conventional angiography.     

Symposium: controversies in cerebrovascular disease 4. Appropriate imaging before carotid endarterectomy

The question of which imaging method to use before performing carotid endarterectomy is a common and practical issue confronted by vascular surgeons. The imaging modalities of duplex ultrasonography, angiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have all been used in the preoperative assessment of the patient scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. This article focuses on these 4 modalities, with particular emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of duplex ultrasonography versus angiography. The emergence of duplex ultrasonography as the sole preoperative imaging test has generated controversy among vascular surgeons and other specialists who deal with patients with carotid artery disease. Angiography, which has been the “gold standard” imaging test in the past and has been the reference standard in the large, randomized, controlled trials, imposes a small but definite risk of stroke and death. Duplex ultrasonography can be used as the sole preoperative imaging test on a selective basis, provided that there is institutional validation and ongoing quality assurance. Although MRA is not widely available, the combination of MRA and duplex ultrasonography can provide similar diagnostic accuracy to angiography in some institutions. Routine CT appears to be unnecessary but is useful in certain circumstances.     

Cross-sectional Magnetic Resonance Angiography Is Accurate in Predicting Degree of Carotid Stenosis

Carotid stenosis is currently estimated using methods based on flow velocity or two-dimensional projection images. Manipulation of magnetic resonance (MR) images in three dimensions (3-D MR) allows for direct measurement of carotid artery cross-sectional luminal area. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the accuracy of 3-DMR as a technique for estimating carotid artery stenosis, and (2) to compare 3-D MR results with estimates from duplex ultrasound sonography (DUS) and conventional angiography. Twenty-nine patients underwent rapid, contrast-enhanced MRA within 1 month prior to carotid endarterectomy to obtain 3-D angiographic images of the carotid bifurcation. From these data, post-processing software was used to generate a longitudinal axis through the center of the vessel along which orthogonal cross-sectional images were taken. Luminal area measurements at the location of tightest stenosis and the distal normal internal carotid artery were obtained and used to calculate percent area stenosis. Applying the same procedure, 18 en bloc, ex vivo carotid plaques served as the standard against which we compared in vivo 3-D MR measurements at the location of tightest stenosis. Percent stenosis comparisons between MRA, angiography, and duplex ultrasound were also made. Our results showed that the measurement of luminal area by 3-DMR is accurate in predicting the degree of carotid stenosis. Direct measurement of luminal area may overcome limitations inherent to methods that rely on flow velocities and two-dimensional views of the carotid vasculature. A larger prospective study is necessary to confirm the reliability of this technique.     

Magnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated whether magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) enabled definition of cerebrovascular anatomy after indeterminate or inadequate results at duplex ultrasound scanning to facilitate patient selection for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and for technical planning. METHODS: After implementation of a protocol in October 1998 to minimize use of cerebral arteriography, MRA (arch/cervical two-dimensional and cranial three-dimensional time of flight technique) was performed in 138 consecutive patients with cerebrovascular occlusive disease and inconclusive duplex scans obtained by an ICAVL-approved laboratory. The ability of MRA to define anatomic features unresolved at duplex scanning was compared between categories of duplex scan inadequacies. Operative outcome was compared between patients requiring MRA before CEA (n = 66) and a concurrent cohort undergoing CEA on the basis of duplex scan results only (n = 69). RESULTS: Incomplete imaging of the carotid bifurcation, because of high bifurcation, long (>3 cm) internal carotid artery (ICA) plaque, or calcific shadows, was the most common reason for inadequate duplex scans (n = 74, 53%), followed by borderline severe ICA disease (23.17%), suspected extracervical disease (supra-aortic trunk, vertebral, or intracranial, 22, 16%), ICA near- occlusion (12.9%), and diffuse recurrent stenosis (7.5%). MRA enabled resolution of duplex scan inadequacies in 95% of patients with disease confined to the carotid bifurcation, and 90% of all patients, but was least accurate for delineation of extracervical lesions (77%) and near-occlusions (75%). In 5 of 8 patients (6%) arteriography was performed to determine operability of ICA near-occlusion or extracervical lesions. Combined stroke and death rates after CEA were not statistically different (P =.3) between patients requiring MRA (3 of 66, 4.6%) and the concurrent group in whom MRA was performed solely on the basis of duplex results (1 of 69, 1.5%). However, intraoperative technical adjustments (anatomy that precluded shunt use, extended endarterectomy length, ICA shortening due to tortuosity) were planned in 71% of patients (12 of 17) with MRA-defined anatomy, but only 36% of patients (4 of 11) with long CEA on the basis of duplex results only (P =.08). CONCLUSION: MRA replaces the need for cerebral arteriography in most patients after inadequate carotid duplex scanning. Delineation of cerebrovascular anatomy at MRA assists in determination of CEA candidacy and operative planning.     

Posttraumatic innominate artery aneurysm with occlusion of the common carotid artery at its origin by an intimal flap

Blunt trauma involving the innominate and carotid arteries is a rare occurrence that can be lethal or have serious neurologic sequelae. To our knowledge this is the first reported case in the international literature describing the association of posttraumatic innominate, artery aneurysm with total occlusion and thrombosis of the common carotid artery at its origin by an intimal flap. The diagnostic problems created by this unusual injury are discussed. In this case the patency of the distal portion of the common and internal carotid arteries was demonstrated by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), whereas color duplex and digital arteriographic studies were unsuccessful. This demonstration was crucial to patient management. Since no studies are available comparing color duplex imaging, conventional arteriography, and MRA in the evaluation of blunt carotid trauma, this case study is presented to demonstrate the utility of MRA in emergency situations. In addition, we analyze the possible pathogenesis and discuss the surgical treatment.     

Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients — Is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis

Purpose: Findings from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) indicate that carotid endarterectomy can be beneficial in symptom-free patients with 60% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. However, patients in ACAS who underwent contrast angiography (CA) before carotid endarterectomy were exposed to an additional 1.2% risk of stroke.Methods: We used the methods of decision analysis to assess whether the overall 5-year stroke risk in symptom-free patients with suspected carotid artery disease can be reduced by preoperative imaging with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or duplex ultrasonography (DU). We compared four strategies for the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis in symptom-free patients: 1) CA alone, 2) MRA alone, 3) DU alone, and 4) MRA and DU with CA when the results of these tests disagree. Accuracies of MRA and DU were estimated from 81 patients exposed to all three procedures; stroke risks for patients with 60% to 99% carotid artery stenosis were obtained from ACAS.Results: For predicting 60% to 99% carotid stenoses, sensitivity and specificity for noninvasive tests, optimized to reduce morbidity, were as follows: DU (0.96, 0.66), MRA (1.00, 0.76), DU/MRA (1.00, 0.86; 26% would require CA). The 5-year stroke risk of these four strategies in order of decreasing benefit was MRA, 6.17%; MRA/DU, 6.34%; DU, 6.35%; and CA, 7.12%. In sensitivity analyses, noninvasive tests were advantageous even if the stroke rate with CA diminished to 0.4%, or if the sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive tests fell to 70%.Conclusion: The preoperative use of noninvasive tests resulted in a lower 5-year stroke risk compared with CA in symptom-free patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis. (J VASC SURG 1995;22:706-16.)     

Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy

A retrospective review of 63 patients undergoing duplex scanning and angiography for suspected carotid artery disease was performed to evaluate the need for routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy. A consultant surgeon (M.H.) made a simulated management decision on the basis of a clinical summary and a duplex scan report. Twenty-four patients were selected for surgery without angiography; duplex scanning had a sensitivity of 100 per cent and a specificity of 90 per cent in the detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. In two cases duplex scanning misdiagnosed a total occlusion as a critical stenosis. Eighteen patients failed to meet the criteria for surgery and were referred for angiography. Twenty-one patients were selected for conservative treatment on the basis of the duplex scan report. Combining the surgical and conservative groups (45 patients), duplex scanning had a sensitivity of 96 per cent and specificity of 95 per cent for the detection of stenosis greater than 50 per cent. In the identification of a total occlusion, duplex scanning had a poor sensitivity of 50 per cent. These results suggest that routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary in selected patients but that a suspected occlusion should be confirmed by angiography.     

Gadolinium-Enhanced Versus Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography: What Is the Benefit of Contrast Enhancement in Evaluating Carotid Stenosis?

Accurate patient selection based on preoperative imaging is imperative to good risk reduction in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (GE MRA) versus time-of-flight (TOF) MRA in the work-up of patients undergoing CEA. Patients undergoing CEA between 1999 and 2001 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. GE or TOF MRA was obtained on extracranial carotid arteries (n = 319) in patients undergoing CEA. Stenosis on MRA images was graded as moderate (n = 76) or severe (n = 243) by an attending radiologist who was blind to duplex results. Duplex imaging was performed in an Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Labs (ICAVL) accredited lab, and stenosis was stratified as moderate (50-79%, n = 76) or high (80-99%, n = 243) grade using University of Washington criteria. For each patient, the degree of stenosis as determined by MRA (GE versus TOF) was compared to percent stenosis on duplex. For moderate-grade lesions, GE MRA concurred with duplex in 11.1% (4/36), underestimated in 2.8% (1/36), and overestimated in 86.1% (31/36) of carotid arteries imaged. TOF MRA concurred with duplex in 35% (14/40), underestimated in 0% (0/40), and overestimated in 65% (26/40) of carotid arteries. High-grade lesions demonstrated improved concordance between MRA and duplex. For these lesions, GE MRA concurred with duplex in 95.6% (130/136) of carotid arteries imaged, never overestimated stenosis (0/136), and underestimated in 4.4% (6/136). TOF MRA concurred with duplex 96.3% (103/107), overestimated stenosis as an occlusion in 0.9% (1/107), and underestimated in 2.8% (3/107). In addition to neck visualization, the GE technique allowed simultaneous aortic arch imaging. This was accomplished in 79.1% (136/172) of all GE MRAs. Simultaneous aortic arch imaging was not technically feasible with TOF MRA. For moderate-grade lesions, both MR techniques are inaccurate predictors of degree of carotid stenosis and result in a significant overestimation of stenosis. Each technique demonstrates improved concordance with duplex ultrasound in the setting of severe carotid artery stenoses. The ability of GE MRA to simultaneously image the aortic arch and the neck may allow for detection of occult tandem lesions and other anatomic variations, which may be particularly important in preoperative planning for cartid artery stenting. Presented at the Fifteenth Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Steamboat Springs, CO, January 28-30, 2005.     

Difference of Thrombus Location between Initial Noninvasive Vascular Image and First DSA Findings in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion: Post Hoc Analysis of the SKIP Study

In patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy for intracranial large vessel occlusion, the occluded site is sometimes distal to the site shown in the initial vascular imaging. We investigated the factors related to the change in the occluded site between the sequential imagings. The 203 patients in the SKIP study were reviewed retrospectively. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) was used to assess the occluded site. The occluded site shown in the cerebral angiography appeared to be distal to the occluded site shown in the initial vascular imaging in 55 patients (group A). The location of the occluded site in the remaining 148 patients did not change between the sequential imagings (group B). MRA was used more often than CTA in group A (54 MRA, 1 CTA; P <0.01). Patients with middle cerebral artery (M1) occlusion were more likely to show change of the occluded site than patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion (M1: 38%, ICA: 9%; P <0.01). The number of patients who received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator did not differ between the two groups (group A: 54%, group B: 49%; P = 0.5). In patients with acute intracranial large vessel occlusion who require mechanical thrombectomy, physicians should be aware that the location of the thrombus may be distal to the occluded site shown in the initial vascular imaging, particularly in patients with M1 occlusion shown by MRA.     

Diagnostic value of CTA and MRA in intracranial traumatic aneurysms

Objective： To investigate the diagnostic value of computerized tomographic angiography （ CTA ） and magnetic resonance angiography （ MRA ） for intracranial traumatic aneurysms （TAs）. Methods： CTA and MRA of six patients with intracranial TAs verified by digital subtraction angiography （DSA） and surgery were retrospectively analysed. All patients were examined by nonenhanced computerized tomography （CT） and two by CTA. The source data were reconstructed by volume rendering （VR） and multi-planar reconstruction （MPR） from CTA. Four of them had maxhnum intensity project （MIP） from MRA. Results ： Of the six patients, a total of seven TAs were detected by CTA and MRA examinations. Five cases had only one TA and one case had two TAs. The average diameter was 2.3 cm （1.1-3.3 cm）. CTA demonstrated two TAs appeared at the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery （ICA） and the middle cerebral artery （MCA） respectively. MCA TA was definitely and dearly demonstrated on VR images, whereas VR images failed to depict the cavernous ICA TA, which was detected on MPR images. Two TAs were found irregular saccular shape,irregular margin of parent artery and wide neck on CTA. Four MRA examinations demonstrated five TAs, including the cavernous segment ICA TAs （2 cases）, the supraclinoid segment ICA TA （1 case ）, and the cavernous segment associated with opposite side of the petrosal segment ICA TA （1 case）. In a cavernous ICA TA, MRA only revealed aneurysm body, whereas aneurysm neck and distal segment of the parent artery were not revealed. In the remaining cases, MRA clearly depicted aneurysm body and parent artery, whereas the neck was not displayed. ICA TAs showed irregular capsnle-like high signal intensity on MRA images. Four TAs exhibited irregular distal segment of the parent artery. TAs at the supraclinoid segment or MCA failed to find fracture signs on nonenhanced CT. Conclusions： Both CTA and MRA examinations are the effective non-invasive method of imageology for diagnosing intracranlal TAs, while CTA is more eligible for diagnosing TAs after nonenhanced CT has demonstrated skull base fractures.     

Application of CT Angiography of Complex Cerebrovascular Lesions during Surgical Decision Making

Helical computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a relatively new noninvasive volumetric imaging technique. Since early reports in the 1990s, CTA has rapidly improved image resolution and scan volume. Cerebral arteries can be imaged clearly, which is advantageous in the diagnosis of vascular diseases such as cerebral aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, and cerebrovascular occlusive disease. Before attacking a cerebrovascular lesion near or in the skull base, precise preoperative knowledge of anatomic relationships between the bony and neurovascular structures is critical for obtaining successful outcomes. The sensitivity of CTA for the detection of cerebral aneurysms < or = 5 mm in diameter may be higher than that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), with equal specificity and high interoperator reliability. With minor modification to the technique, paraclinoid vascular lesions can be depicted using CTA. We present our experience using CTA in addition to DSA to obtain important anatomic information about skull base vascular lesions that assisted in the clinical decision-making process.     

Modalities of preoperative imaging of the internal carotid artery used in France

A survey of the 382 members of the Société de Chirurgie Vasculaire de Langue Fran?aise was conducted to determine preferred imaging techniques for preoperative assessment of the proximal internal carotid artery. A total of 180 questionnaires were returned concerning 9390 carotid stenoses treated in the year 2000. Doppler ultrasound (DUS), angiography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were routinely used in 99%, 51.5%, 4%, and 3% of cases. Usual work-up methods involved DUS and angiography in 64% of cases, DUS and MRA in 7%, and DUS and CTA in 4% of cases. Indications for endarterectomy were based on DUS and angiography findings in 69% of cases, on DUS and MRA findings in 14%, on DUS and CTA findings in 9%, and on DUS findings alone in 8%. In-house access to CTA or MRA was more frequent at state-run institutions (p = 0.00001). Indication of endarterectomy based on DUS and MRA was more common at institutions equipped with technical facilities for MRA (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.001). An inverse correlation was observed between the number of carotid artery procedures performed and use of DUS and angiography work-up. The number of carotid endarterectomies without angiography is increasing in France. Preoperative DUS is still routinely used. Combined DUS and MRA is the preferred work-up for endarterectomy without angiography. Lack of access to MRA is still a limiting factor. Further study will be needed to evaluate the benefits and risks of endarterectomy without angiography.