PR/RR Interval Ratio During Rapid Atrial Pacing:

Method for Confirming Slow Pathway Conduction. Introduction: Although the AV conduction curve in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is usually discontinuous, many patients with this arrhythmia do not demonstrate criteria for dual AV nodal pathways. During rapid atrial pacing, the PR interval often exceeds the pacing cycle length when there is anterograde conduction over the slow pathway and AVNRT is induced. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the diagnostic value of the ratio of the PR interval to the RR interval during rapid atrial pacing as an indicator of anterograde slow pathway conduction in patients undergoing electrophysioiogic testing. Methods and Results: The PR and RR intervals were measured during rapid atrial pacing at the maximum rate with consistent 1:1 AV conduction in four study groups: (1) patients with inducible AV nodal reentry and the classical criterion for dual AV nodal pathways during atrial extrastimulus testing (AVNRT Group 1); (2) patients with inducible AV nodal reentry without dual AV nodal pathways (AVNRT Group 2); (3) control subjects ≤ 60 years of age without inducible AV nodal reentry; and (4) control subjects > 60 years of age without inducible AV nodal reentry. For both groups of patients with inducible AV nodal reentry, AV conduction was assessed before and after radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway. Before slow pathway ablation, the PR/RR ratio exceeded 1.0 in 12 of 13 AVNRT Group 1 patients (mean 1.27 ± 0.21) and 16 of 17 AVNRT Group 2 patients (mean 1.18 ± 0.15, P = NS Group 1 vs Group 2). After slow pathway ablation, the maximum PR/RR ratio was < 1.0 in all AVNRT patients (Group 1 = 0.59 ± 0.08, P < 0. 00001 vs before ablation: Group 2 = 0.67 ± 0.11; P < 0.00001 vs before ablation). Among both groups of control subjects, the PR/RR ratio was > 1.0 in only 3 of 27 patients with no relation to patient age. Conclusion: The ratio of the PR interval to the RR interval during rapid atrial pacing at the maximum rate with consistent 1:1 AV conduction provides a simple and clinically useful method for determining the presence of slow AV nodal pathway conduction. This finding may be particularly useful in patients with inducible AV nodal reentry without dual AV nodal physiology on atrial extrastimulus testing.     

Conversion of typical to "atypical" atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular junction.

Typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is characterized by anterograde activation over a slowly conducting pathway and by retrograde activation through a rapidly conducting pathway. Preliminary reports suggest that radiofrequency catheter modification can eliminate typical AVNRT while preserving anterograde conduction. Radiofrequency catheter modification was used to treat 88 patients with typical AVNRT. After baseline electrophysiologic evaluation, the ablation catheter was positioned proximal and superior to the site of maximal His deflection. Radiofrequency energy was applied until there was significant attenuation of retrograde conduction, and elimination of AVNRT inducibility. Eighty-one patients were successfully treated and form the basis of this report. A new paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with RP greater than PR interval was induced at electrophysiologic testing after successful ablation in 9 patients (11%). Mean atrial-His activation time was 140 +/- 31 ms, and the ventriculoatrial activation time was 170 +/- 46 ms. This arrhythmia was induced only with ventricular pacing during isoproterenol infusion and appeared to be mediated by AV nodal reentry. New retrograde dual AV nodal physiology after modification was more frequent in patients with atypical tachycardia than in those without (4 of 9 vs 2 of 72; p less than 0.0001). Although none of the patients were treated, only 1 of 9 had an episode of spontaneous atypical tachycardia during a mean follow-up of 12 months. Results of this study confirm that typical AVNRT can be rendered noninducible without the complete destruction of reentrant pathways. Because induction of "atypical" AVNRT was not predictive of spontaneous arrhythmia recurrence, it should not be an indication for additional ablation sessions or long-term drug therapy.     

从慢径消融发生的交界区心律试探房室结双径的本质

７６例慢－快型房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）患者接受房室结慢径消融术。６５例慢径阻断、９例双径存在但ＡＶＮＲＴ不能诱发、２例快径阻断。慢径阻断后，除快径的前传有效不应期（ＥＲＰ）缩短（２８７．０±７９．０ｍｓｖｓ３４４．０±８７．０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１）外，房室传导的文氏点、２１阻滞点、室房传导的１１点、快径逆传ＥＲＰ、前传和逆传功能不应期均无明显改变。共放电８４１次，其中无交界区心律的３１７次放电，无一次消融成功。６５例慢径阻断者，交界区心律减少或消失。以上结果提示快径和慢径可能是两条各具电生理特性的传导纤维。     

Differential Effects of Atropine and Isoproterenol on Inducibility of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Background: Radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) relies on tachycardia non-inducibility after ablation as success criterion. However, AVNRT is frequently non-inducible at baseline. Thus, autonomic enhancement using either atropine or isoproterenol is frequently used for arrhythmia induction before ablation. Methods: 80 patients (57 women, 23 men, age 50±14 years) undergoing slow pathway ablation for recurrent AVNRT were randomized to receive either 0.01mg/kg atropine or 0.5-1.0g/kg/min isoproterenol before ablation after baseline assessment of AV conduction. The effects of either drug on ante- and retrograde conduction was assessed by measuring sinus cycle length, PR and AH interval, antegrade and retrograde Wenckebach cycle length (WBCL), antegrade effective refractory period (ERP) of slow and fast pathway and maximal stimulus-to-H interval during slow and fast pathway conduction. Results: Inducibility of AVNRT at baseline was not different between patients randomized to atropine (73%) and isoproterenol (58%) but was reduced after atropine (45%) compared to isoproterenol (93%, P<0.001). Of the 28 patients non-inducible at baseline isoproterenol rendered AVNRT inducible in 21, atropine in 4 patients. Dual AV nodal pathway physiology was present in 88% before and 50% after atropine compared to 83% before and 73% after isoproterenol. Whereas both drugs exerted similar effects on ante- and retrograde fast pathway conduction maximal SH interval during slow pathway conduction was significantly shorter after isoproterenol (300±48ms vs. 374±113ms, P=0.012). Conclusion: Isoproterenol yields higher AVNRT inducibility than atropine in patients non-inducible at baseline. This may be caused by a more pronounced effect on antegrade slow pathway conduction.     

Simultaneous dual fast and slow pathway conduction upon induction of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: electrophysiologic characteristics in a series of patients

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous dual atrioventricular nodal conduction (SDNC) through slow (SP) and fast pathway (FP) is a rare phenomenon observed upon the induction of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT). The aim of this study is to report the electrophysiological features of patients showing typical AVNRT induced through SDNC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 461 consecutive patients with typical AVNRT submitted to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), seven patients (1.5%) with SDNC at tachycardia onset (group I: 6 female; age 60-72 years, mean 65.2 +/- 3.8 years) and 118 age-matched controls (group II: 60 female; age 60-88 years, mean 68.4 +/- 6.8 years) were considered. Controls were further subdivided into two subgroups according to age: subgroup A (94 patients, age 60-75 years) and subgroup B (24 patients, age >75 years). The value of the following parameters was significantly higher in group I than in group II and in subgroup A: A-H interval [113 +/- 26 vs. 89 +/- 27 (P < 0.01) vs. 84 +/- 19 (P < 0.001)], ventriculoatrial conduction effective refractory period [355 +/- 85 vs. 293 +/- 87 (P < 0.05) vs. 281 +/- 82 (P < 0.05)], SP conduction time upon AVNRT induction [444 +/- 104 vs. 350 +/- 72 (P < 0.01); vs. 345 +/- 67 (P < 0.001)], AVNRT cycle length [484 +/- 103 vs. 396 +/- 71 ms (P < 0.05); vs. 384 +/- 69 (P < 0.05)], and rate of AVNRT induction from ventricle [71% vs. 10% (P = 0.001); vs. 6% (P = 0.001)]. Differences were mostly not significant between group I and subgroup B. SP location and RFCA success rate were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: In a population of AVNRT patients, SDNC at AVNRT induction is infrequent and it prevails beyond the fifth decade of life and in females. SDNC is associated with peculiar AVN conduction features, which resemble the age-related modifications of AVN conduction.     

Decremental Conduction in the Posterior and Anterior AV Nodal Inputs

The role for fiber orientation as a determinant of conduction and block in the posterior (slow pathway, SP) and anterior (fast pathway, FP) AV nodal inputs was examined using multiple extracellular bipolar and intracellular microelectrode recordings in the superfused canine AV junction (N = 14). Results: In both inputs, antegrade longitudinal conduction velocity decremented in association with decreased action potential amplitude and dV/dt _max. A similar decrement was also present in the SP transverse to fiber orientation. SP conduction block occurred preferentially near its insertion into the compact AV node with very slow conduction (0.05 ± 0.01 M/sec) preceding conduction block. Distal antegrade FP conduction block occurred before conduction block occurred at more proximal FP sites. Conduction in the distal FP was maintained at a higher velocity (0.11 ± 0.01 M/sec, p < 0.05 vs. SP) before 2:1 conduction block was observed. Conduction velocity, action potential amplitude, and dV/dt _max were not different at any SP or FP site for paired activation transverse and longitudinal to fiber orientation. Conclusions: The data do not demonstrate a role for fiber orientation determining decremental conduction and block in transitional cell AV nodal inputs. Decremental conduction in both the SP and FP inputs is consistent with a proximal-to-distal gradient in resting membrane potential, action potential amplitude, dV/dt _max, and intracellular excitability in transitional cells during antegrade activation.     

从射频消融探讨房室结双径路的本质和房室结改良的机制

采用两种方法对142例房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者进行房室结改良。128例慢—快型AVNRT中,83例单纯慢径改良,33例慢径前传和快径逆传同时改良,3例单纯快径逆传改良,7例快径前传和慢径或快径逆传同时改良,2例失败。1例发生永久性Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞;10例快—慢型和4例慢—慢型AVNRT患者均慢径改良成功。总成功率98.6％。平均随访6±4月,4例(2.8％)复发,均再次消融成功。慢径改良后,快径前传有效不应期、维持1:1快径前传最短的心房刺激周期明显缩短(P<0.05),而逆向快径有效不应期、维持1:1快径逆传最短的心室刺激周期无明显变化(P>O.05)。本研究提示:快径和慢径可能是解剖上不同的纤维。慢径前传和逆传可以是同一条纤维,也可以是不同的纤维;快径亦然。     

Slow atrioventricular nodal pathway affecting fast pathway conduction

A 15‐year‐old girl with a history of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia underwent an electrophysiology study (EPS) for diagnosis and ablation. Her baseline electrocardiogram and echocardiogram were normal. At EPS, she had dual atrioventricular nodal (AVN) conduction, but isoproterenol was needed to initiate the slow‐fast form of AVN reentry. Before ablation without any isoproterenol, she began to have a spontaneous block in the fast pathway with continuous conduction over the slow pathway. After ablation of the slow pathway, all complexes conducted over the fast pathway during a 25‐year follow‐up. Possible electrotonic interaction between the slow and fast pathways is proposed as the mechanism for this phenomenon.     

AV nodal dual pathway electrophysiology and Wenckebach periodicity

Dual Pathways and Wenckebach Periodicity. Introduction: The precise mechanism(s) governing the phenomenon of AV nodal Wenckebach periodicity is not fully elucidated. Currently 2 hypotheses, the decremental conduction and the Rosenbluethian step‐delay, are most frequently used. We have provided new evidence that, in addition, dual pathway (DPW) electrophysiology is directly involved in the manifestation of AV nodal Wenckebach phenomenon. Methods and Results: AV nodal cellular action potentials (APs) were recorded from 6 rabbit AV node preparations during standard A1A2 and incremental pacing protocols. His electrogram alternans, a validated index of DPW electrophysiology, was used to monitor fast (FP) and slow (SP) pathway conduction. The data were collected in intact AV nodes, as well as after SP ablation. In all studied hearts the Wenckebach cycle started with FP propagation, followed by transition to SP until its ultimate block. During this process complex cellular APs were observed, with decremental foot formations reflecting the fading FP and second depolarizations produced by the SP. In addition, the AV node cells exhibited a progressive loss in maximal diastolic membrane potential (MDP) due to incomplete repolarization. The pause created with the blocked Wenckebach beat was associated with restoration of MDP and reinitiation of the conduction cycle via the FP wavefront. Conclusion: DPW electrophysiology is dynamically involved in the development of AV nodal Wenckebach periodicity. In the intact AV node, the cycle starts with FP that is progressively weakened and then replaced by SP propagation, until block occurs. AV nodal SP modification did not eliminate Wenckebach periodicity but strongly affected its paradigm. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp.1‐7)     

Unusual induction of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Report of two cases

INTRODUCTION: Generally, the induction of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) occurs with a premature atrial stimulus that blocks in the fast pathway and proceeds down the slow pathway slowly enough to allow the refractory fast pathway time to recover. We describe two cases in which a typical AVNRT was induced in an unusual fashion. RESULTS: The first case is a 41-year-old man with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. During the electrophysiology study, the atrial extrastimulus inducing the typical AVNRT was conducted simultaneously over the fast (AH) and the slow pathway (AH'). A successful ablation of the slow pathway was performed. During the follow-up no recurrence was noted. The second case is a 52-year-old woman with a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome due to a left posterior accessory pathway. After 5 minutes of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) induced by a ventricular extrastimulus, a variability of the antegrade conduction was noted in presence of the same VA conduction. In fact, a short AH interval (fast pathway) alternated with a more prolonged AH intervals (slow pathway) that progressively lengthened until a typical AVNRT was induced. The ablation of the accessory pathway eliminated both tachycardias. DISCUSSION: A rare manifestation of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways is a double ventricular response to an atrial impulse that may cause a tachycardia with an atrioventricular conduction of 1:2. In our first case, an atrial extrastimulus was simultaneously conducted over the fast and the slow pathway inducing an AVNRT. This nodal reentry implies two different mechanisms: 1) a retrograde block on the slow pathway impeding the activation of the slow pathway from the impulse coming down the fast pathway, and 2) a critical slowing of conduction in the slow pathway to allow the recovery of excitability of the fast pathway. Interestingly, in the second case, during an AVRT the atrial impulse suddenly proceeded alternately over the fast and the slow pathway. The progressive slowing of conduction over the slow pathway until a certain point which allows the recovery of excitability of the fast pathway determines the AVNRT. This is a case of "tachycardia-induced tachycardia" as confirmed by the fact that the ablation of the accessory pathway eliminated both tachycardias.     

房室结双径路合并房室旁路的折返性心动过速及射频消融治疗

目的本研究旨在探讨房室结双径路（ＤＡＶＮＰ）合并房室旁路（ＡＰ）的电生理特征和射频消融要求。方法对２１８例阵发性室上性心动过速（ＰＳＶＴ）进行电生理检查，观察ＰＳＶＴ的前传和逆传途径，然后对ＡＰ或房室结慢径（ＳＰ）进行消融治疗。结果２１８例ＰＳＶＴ中检出ＤＡＶＮＰ＋ＡＰ１０例，检出率为４．６％。其中ＳＰ前传、ＡＰ逆传（ＳＰ－ＡＰ折返）４例，快径（ＦＰ）前传、ＡＰ逆传（ＦＰ－ＡＰ折返）１例，ＳＰ－ＡＰ折返并ＦＰ－ＡＰ折返或ＳＰ／ＦＰ交替前传折返４例，ＳＰ前传、ＦＰ逆传（ＡＰ旁观）１例。１０例患者均作ＡＰ消融，诱发房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）的３例加作ＳＰ消融，术后随访均无复发。结论ＤＡＶＮＰ合并ＡＰ者ＡＰ均作为逆传途径，阻断ＡＰ是消融关键；ＡＰ旁观者也应作ＡＰ消融；仅有ＡＨ跳跃延长者不必接受房室结改良；ＡＰ消融者应作ＤＡＶＮＰ电生理检查。     

Characterization of subforms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Different subforms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have been described ("Slow/Fast", "Slow/Slow" and "Fast/Slow"). Our aim is to improve definition of these subforms, based on systematic evaluation, in a large cohort of patients, of the site of earliest atrial activation, timing intervals, and evidence for the presence or absence of a lower common pathway (LCP). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 344 patients, AVNRT using a slow pathway (SP) for antegrade conduction and earliest atrial activation at the superior septum (i.e. retrograde fast pathway) was present in 81.4% (Slow/Fast). AVNRT using an SP for antegrade conduction and earliest atrial activation at the inferior septum or proximal coronary sinus (i.e. retrograde slow pathway; Slow/Slow) was present in 13.7%. AVNRT with a short A-H interval and retrograde SP conduction (Fast/Slow) was present in 4.9%. All timing intervals during tachycardia are dependent on autonomic tone. H-A intervals during tachycardia (H-A(t)) overlap in Slow/Slow and Slow/Fast AVNRT: Slow/Slow therefore may mimic Slow/Fast AVNRT. The H-A interval during pacing at the tachycardia cycle length (H-A(p)) better discriminates both subforms. The difference between H-A(p) and H-A(t) (Delta H-A) was significantly longer in Slow/Slow compared with Slow/Fast AVNRT (isoprenaline 0.5 microg/min: 27+/-18 ms vs. 1+/-9 ms; p<0.001). Delta H-A>15 ms had a specificity and sensitivity for Slow/Slow of 94% and 64%, respectively. A Delta H-A>15 ms, combined with other data, pointed to the presence of a long LCP in 36 of 43 evaluable Slow/Slow (84%) and all Fast/Slow, but in only 10% of Slow/Fast (p<0.001). Retrograde conduction during ventricular pacing at the tachycardia cycle length was present in only 6% of Fast/Slow. CONCLUSIONS: AVNRT subforms can be distinguished based on a systematic evaluation of atrial activation sequence, timing intervals and evidence for the presence of an LCP.     

快速心房起搏时SV间期与SS间期的比值在房室结折返性心动过速慢径消融中的应用

评价快速心房起搏时最快 1∶1房室传导的SV间期 (SV间期 )与 1∶1房室传导的最短S1S1间期 (SS间期 )的比值 (SV/SS)在房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径消融中的应用 ,将AVNRT分为房室结功能曲线连续组 (Ⅰ组 ,10例 )及房室结功能曲线不连续组 (Ⅱ组 ,17例 )测量心房分级递增刺激时的SS间期与SV间期及SV/SS ,并进行消融前、后和组间比较。结果显示 ,两组消融后SV间期较消融前明显缩短 (Ⅰ组 :2 2 1.0± 2 2 .3vs 35 7.0± 43.7ms;Ⅱ组 :2 0 2 .1± 30 .6vs 379.4± 44 .2ms,P均 <0 .0 5 ) ;消融前后SS间期无明显变化 (Ⅰ组 :310 .0± 40 .6vs 30 8.0± 36 .8ms;Ⅱ组 :332 .9± 48.1vs 336 .5± 6 2 .3ms) ;两组中所有患者消融前SV/SS比值均 >1,而消融后SV/SS比值均 <1。结论 :SV/SS可作为慢径消融成功终点的辅助观察指标之一 ,尤其对于房室结传导曲线呈连续性者 ,使用此方法可简便地观察消融终点 ,增加消融的目的性。     

Utilization of Retrograde Right Bundle Branch Block to Differentiate Atrioventricular Nodal from Accessory Pathway Conduction

Introduction: Defining whether retrograde ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction is via the AV node (AVN) or an accessory pathway (AP) is important during ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). With the introduction of ventricular extrastimuli (VEST), retrograde right bundle branch block (RBBB) may occur, prolonging the V-H interval, but only when AV node conduction is present. We hypothesized that when AP conduction was present, the V-A interval would increase less than the V-H interval, whereas with retrograde nodal conduction, the V-A interval would increase at least as much as the V-H interval.
Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed the electrophysiological studies of patients undergoing ablation for AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (55) or AVRT (50), for induction of retrograde RBBB during the introduction of VEST, and the change in the measured V-H and V-A intervals. Results were found to be reproducible between independent observers. Out of 105 patients, 84 had evidence of induced retrograde RBBB. The average V-H interval increase with induction of RBBB was 53.7 ms for patients with AVRT and 54.4 ms for patients with AVNRT (P = NS). The average V-A interval increase with induction of RBBB was 13.6 ms with AVRT and 70.1 ms with AVNRT (P < 0.001). All patients with a greater V-H than V-A interval change had AVRT, and those with a smaller had AVNRT.
Conclusions: Induction of retrograde RBBB during VEST is common during an electrophysiological study for SVT. The relative change in the intervals during induction of RBBB accurately differentiates between retrograde AVN and AP conduction.     

经导管冷冻消融治疗房室结折返性心动过速

目的探讨经导管冷冻消融治疗房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的安全性和有效性。方法20例患者均行常规电生理检查和冷冻消融。采用心房程序刺激和burst刺激,确定慢径传导的电生理现象和诱发AVNRT。根据解剖,X线影像和局部心电图初步确定慢径消融的靶点,然后进行冷冻标测(-30℃,80s)。经冷冻标测证实为慢径所在部位后,行冷冻消融(-80℃,4min)。消融后观察30min,若无慢径传导恢复或不再诱发AVNRT,则说明冷冻消融手术成功。结果20例中,有18例可证实有慢径传导现象,并可反复诱发AVNRT。其中14例在第1次冷冻消融时就消除了慢径传导。其余4例经3~8次冷冻消融均成功地消除了AVNRT,但其中有2例患者经过反复冷冻消融6~8次后仍有慢经传导,但不能诱发AVNRT。另有2例患者术中未能诱发心动过速,按解剖定位方法试行“慢径”冷冻消融改良术。所有患者经随访1~18个月,无1例复发。20例在冷冻消融的过程中始终未见到加速性交界性心动过速或交界性早搏。2例在冷冻消融过程中出现一过性房室传导阻滞。所有20例在冷冻消融手术过程中未感疼痛。结论冷冻消融安全有效,在治疗AVNRT时,出现永久性房室传导阻滞的危险性更低,术中患者无疼痛。     

Use of adenosine as a diagnostic tool for dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: response of control patients to incremental doses of adenosine

BACKGROUND: Adenosine at low doses preferentially blocks fast over slow pathway conduction in patients with dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology and typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). During atrial pacing, this effect is manifested as an abrupt increase in the AH interval with low doses of adenosine. This demonstration of dual AV nodal physiology may be useful as a diagnostic tool during electrophysiologic studies in patients with supraventricular tachycardia who are not easily inducible, as clear demonstration of dual AV nodal pathways may indicate that AVNRT is a likely diagnosis and that further attempts at arrhythmia induction should be tailored in that direction. However, to be a useful test, adenosine should not cause an abrupt increase in AH interval in patients without dual AV nodal physiology. HYPOTHESIS: This study was designed to investigate the prevalence of dual AV nodal pathways with administration of adenosine in patients with no history suggestive of AVNRT. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who had no prior history of AVNRT and were undergoing electrophysiologic study for standard indications were enrolled. Baseline Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) and AV nodal effective refractory periods were measured at atrial pacing cycle lengths of 400 and 600 ms. The atrium was then paced at WCL + 50 ms, and WCL + 100 ms, while incrementally larger doses of intravenous adenosine were administered until AV nodal block occurred. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation) doses of adenosine required to cause AV nodal block while pacing at WCL + 50 ms and WCL + 100 ms were 7.1 +/- 3.9 and 7.4 +/- 4.5 mg, respectively. In 1 of 37 patients (2.7%, 95% confidence interval 0-8%), an abrupt prolongation of the AH interval was seen with the administration of adenosine during atrial pacing as well as during the atrial refractory period determination. In all other patients, no dual AV nodal physiology was demonstrated during the refractory period determination, and there were only gradual changes in the AH interval with atrial pacing during administration of adenosine. CONCLUSION: Among patients with no history suggestive of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, only 2.7% have clinically silent dual AV nodal pathways using this method. Incremental adenosine infusion during electrophysiologic study can be used as a highly specific diagnostic tool for patients with dual AV nodal pathways.     

Differential Effect of Esmolol on the Fast and Slow AV Nodal Pathways in Patients with AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Esmolol Effect on AV Nodal Pathways. Introduction: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) usually involves anterograde conduction over a slowly conducting (“slow”) pathway and retrograde conduction over a rapidly conducting (“fast”) pathway. A variety of drugs, such as beta blockers, digitalis, and calcium channel blockers, have been reported to prolong AV nodal refractoriness in both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the circuit. However, few data are available that address whether the fast and slow pathways respond in a quantitatively different manner to drugs such as beta-adrenergic antagonists. In addition, it is not known whether the effects of these agents on refractoriness parallel the effects on conduction in the fast and slow pathways. The present study was performed to measure the effect of the intravenous beta-adrenergic agent, esmolol, on refractoriness and conduction in both the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirteen patients with discontinuous AV nodal conduction properties and typical AVNRT were studied. Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal functional assessment was performed at baseline and following steady-state drug infusion of intravenous esmolol at a dose of 500 μg/kg for 1 minute, 150 /μg/kg per minute for the next 4 minutes, followed by a continuous maintenance infusion of 50 to 100 μg/kg per minute. The anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 381 ± 75 msec at baseline to 453 ± 92 msec during the infusion of esmolol (P = 0.003). The anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway was also prolonged by esmolol, from 289 ± 26 msec to 310 ± 17 msec (P = 0.005). However, the absolute magnitude of the change in the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (+72 ± 59 msec) was significantly greater than the change in anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway (+21 ± 16 msec, P = 0.01). The mean retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 276 ± 46 msec to 376 ± 61 msec during esmolol infusion (P = 0.03). Retrograde slow pathway conduction that could not be demonstrated at baseline became manifest in three patients during esmolol infusion. In contrast to the effects of esmolol on refractoriness, the AH interval during anterograde slow pathway conduction prolonged to a far greater extent (+84 msec) than the HA interval associated with retrograde fast pathway conduction (+5 msec, P = 0.04). Conclusion: The beta-adrenergic antagonist, esmolol, has a quantitatively greater effect on anterograde refractoriness of the fast than the slow AV nodal pathway. However, the effects on conduction intervals during AVNRT are greater in the anterograde slow pathway than in the retrograde fast pathway. These observations suggest that the fast and slow pathways may have differential sensitivities to autonomic influences. This difference in the response to beta-adrenergic antagonists may be exploited as a clinically useful method for demonstrating slow pathway conduction in some individuals with AVNRT.     

Properties and substrate of slow pathway exposed with a compact node targeted fast pathway ablation in rabbit atrioventricular node

INTRODUCTION: The properties and substrates of slow and fast AV nodal pathway remain unclear. This applies particularly to the slow pathway (SP), which is largely concealed by fast pathway (FP) conduction. We designed a new FP ablation approach that exposes the SP over the entire cycle length range and allows for its independent characterization and ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Premature stimulation was performed before and after FP ablation with 5.4 +/- 1.9 lesions (300-microm diameter each; overall lesion size 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm) targeting the junction between perinodal and compact node tissues in seven rabbit heart preparations. The resulting SP recovery curve and control curve had the same maximum nodal conduction time (165 +/- 22 msec vs 164 +/- 24 msec; P = NS) and effective refractory period (101 +/- 10 msec vs 100 +/- 9 msec; P = NS). The two curves covered the same cycle length range. However, the SP curve was shifted up with respect to control one at intermediate and long cycle lengths and thus showed a longer minimum nodal conduction time (81 +/- 15 msec vs 66 +/- 10 msec; P < 0.01) and functional refractory period (180 +/- 11 msec vs 170 +/- 12 msec; P < 0.05). The SP curve was continuous and closely fitted by a single exponential function. Small local lesions (2 +/- 1) applied to the posterior nodal extension resulted in third-degree nodal block in all preparations. CONCLUSION: The posterior nodal extension can sustain effective atrial-His conduction at all cycle lengths and account for both the manifest and concealed portion of SP. Slow and FP conduction primarily arise from the posterior extension and compact node, respectively.     

Characteristics of slow pathway conduction after successful AVNRT ablation

Background: AV node slow pathway conduction can persist following successful ablation for AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that careful examination of AV nodal conduction curves before and after effective AVNRT ablation in patients with persistent slow pathway conduction could shed light on this apparent paradox.
Methods and Results: Thirty patients (age 40.9 ± 14.3; 8 male) were included. AV node function curves were created based on pre- and postablation atrial extrastimulus testing. Analysis of slow pathway function curves demonstrated significant decrease in AH for any given coupling interval after ablation (mean difference –68.1 [–94.5, –41.7] P < 0.001), graphically indicated by downward displacement of the curve. In addition, mean slow pathway effective refractory period (ERP) increased from 247.9 ± 36.1 msec to 288.6 ± 56.0 msec (P < 0.001); mean maximum AH interval decreased from 361.3 ± 114.2 msec to 306.9 ± 65.2 msec (P = 0.013 ) ; mean difference in minimum and maximum AH interval during slow pathway conduction decreased (from 94.5 ± 75.8 msec to 59.6 ± 46.2 msec (P = 0.016 ). Finally, mean difference between the fast and slow pathway effective refractory periods, the span of coupling intervals over which slow pathway conduction occurred, decreased (from 113.9 ± 61.4 msec to 63.2 ± 41.5 msec, P = 0.001).
Conclusions: Ablation, which successfully eliminates inducible and spontaneous AVNRT in the presence of persistent slow pathway conduction, is associated with significantly altered slow pathway conduction characteristics, indicating the presence of a damaged or different slow pathway after ablation, incapable of sustaining tachycardia.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: Electrophysiologic comparisons in patients with and without 2:1 infra-his block

Patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) occasionally may demonstrate a 2:1 infra-His block during tachycardia. However, the electrophysiologic background of this phenomenon has not been established so far. In the present study we compared the electrophysiologic parameters of 10 consecutive patients with a transient 2:1 infra-His block during AVNRT of the common type (Group A) with those of 17 consecutive patients without this phenomenon during tachycardia (Group B). Transient 2:1 infra-His block occurred without termination of the tachycardia in all 10 patients of Group A. The tachycardia sustained despite intermittent or permanent conduction disturbance of the infrahisian tissue in 8 of these 10 patients. In comparison, the electrophysiologic parameters of 17 patients without 2:1 block during AVNRT of the common type (Group B) were analyzed. A significantly longer antegrade (318±58 ms vs. 259±50 ms) and retrograde (308±59 ms vs. 239±20 ms) AV conduction capacity could be demonstrated in these patients. The tachycardia cycle length did not differ significantly between the two groups, although the mean tachycardia cycle length was 48 ms longer in patients of Group B. These observations demonstrate an advanced conduction capacity in patients with a transient infra-His block during AVRNT of the common type. This study underlines that the reentry circuit in AVNRT is not necessarily dependent on infrahisian tissue.