Immune hemolytic anemia induced by 6-mercaptopurine

BACKGROUND: Myelosuppression is the main hematotoxic effect of 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), which is an antimetabolite chemotherapy drug. Immune hemolytic anemia associated with this drug has not been previously reported. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia presented with anemia 2 weeks after 6-MP therapy had been initiated. Additional tests provided laboratory evidence of hemolysis. When treatment was stopped, the patient's condition and laboratory results showed a progressive improvement. RESULTS: The direct antiglobulin test was positive for IgG. The eluate and the serum were not reactive with panel red cells but reacted with 6-MP-treated red cells, while the normal serum pool was unreactive. The direct antiglobulin test was no longer positive by 20 days after the cessation of 6-MP therapy. CONCLUSION: This drug, 6-MP, should be added to the list of drugs that have been reported to cause immune hemolytic anemia by means of the so-called hapten mechanism.     

The first example of a patient with etoricoxib‐induced immune hemolytic anemia

BACKGROUND: Etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2, is increasingly used in pain relief. Here, we report the first case of etoricoxib‐induced immune hemolytic anemia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An 84‐year‐old male patient developed anemia 1 week after treatment with etoricoxib. There was no evidence of hemoglobinemia or hemoglobinuria. Administration of the drug was halted, and the patient recovered without further complications. RESULTS: The patient's red blood cells (RBCs) were found to be strongly coated with immunoglobulin G and C3d. Eluted antibodies and dialyzed serum from the patient were not reactive with untreated RBCs, but with etoricoxib‐treated RBCs, RBCs in the presence of etoricoxib, urine containing drug metabolites (ex vivo antigen), and two of four additional COX inhibitor drugs analyzed. DISCUSSION: Although the causative antibodies were drug dependent usually leading to abrupt and intravascular hemolysis, the patient only gradually developed anemia. These findings together with a positive direct and indirect antiglobulin test may lead to confusion with autoimmune hemolytic anemia of warm type. A nonreactive eluate was the key serologic finding in identifying drug‐induced immune hemolytic anemia in this case. CONCLUSION: Etoricoxib should be considered as a risk in the development of immune hemolytic anemia, with the causative antibodies potentially reacting with other COX inhibitors.     

Hemolysis and methemoglobinemia secondary to rasburicase administration

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia developing after rasburicase administration to a patient with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. CASE SUMMARY: A 50-year-old African American man was hospitalized with new onset seizure, diabetic ketoacidosis, respiratory failure, and acute renal failure. Serum uric acid concentrations were elevated, and the patient was treated with one dose of intravenous rasburicase 22.5 mg for acute renal failure secondary to hyperuricemia. Routine arterial blood gas analyses performed after rasburicase was administered revealed elevated methemoglobin concentrations, which peaked at 14.7%. Hemolytic anemia developed as evidenced by a fall in blood hemoglobin from 14.8 to 5.3 g/dL. The patient made a full recovery following aggressive fluid therapy, blood transfusions, and respiratory support. G6PD deficiency was subsequently confirmed. The Naranjo probability scale indicated that rasburicase was a probable cause of hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. DISCUSSION: Rasburicase is contraindicated in patients with G6PD deficiency as it may cause hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. As of September 26, 2005, simultaneous occurrence of hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia has not been reported in patients receiving rasburicase. CONCLUSIONS: As of September 26, 2005, screening for G6PD deficiency should be performed whenever possible prior to chemotherapy administration in patients at risk of developing tumor lysis syndrome.     

Sulindac-induced immune hemolytic anemia

BACKGROUND: Sulindac, a nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, indene-derived drug, caused life-threatening immune hemolytic anemia in an individual with back pain. CASE REPORT: A patient was admitted to the hospital with immune hemolytic anemia and kidney and liver failure after several days ingestion of sulindac. The direct antiglobulin test was positive with polyspecific and monospecific anti-IgG but not with anti-C3. The eluate did not react in routine tests but reacted strongly after the addition of sulindac. The serum contained a sulindac-dependent antibody reacting to a titer of 32. The sulindac-dependent antibody was of both IgG and IgM classes and had no apparent blood group specificity. The antibody agglutinated red cells from humans and chimpanzees but not from chickens, rabbits, or sheep, which implied that a specific component on human and chimpanzee red cells was needed for reactivity. The antibody reacted with red cells treated with trypsin, papain, pronase, dithiothreitol, and sialidase. With aggressive medical care, the patient's condition improved. CONCLUSION: These findings appear compatible with the so-called immune complex mechanism for drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia. Physicians are alerted to the severe nature of this syndrome.     

The first case of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia due to hydrocortisone

BACKGROUND: Drug‐induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is a well‐known complication of drug treatment. Sensitization can occur, due to interaction of the drug and/or its metabolites with cells of the immune system, after the first drug administration, while the hemolytic crisis generally occurs after repeated administration of a drug. This event occurred in the case described here of acute hemolysis due to the administration of corticosteroids. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To define the etiopathogenesis of the hemolytic crisis, immunohematologic screening and specific tests were performed to identify antibodies against a possible drug–red cell (RBC) complex and circulating drug–anti‐drug antibody immune complexes. Six drugs administered to the patient were tested and results were confirmed by test repetition using other types of corticosteroids. RESULTS: Indirect antiglobulin test performed with the patient's serum sample on 22 RBC samples from commercial panels was strongly positive, while it was negative on RBCs from ABO‐compatible donors. The same test repeated on commercial RBCs after washing was negative. Specific tests were negative for five of the six tested drugs, while RBCs incubated with hydrocortisone strongly reacted with the patient's serum. The same tests performed using other types of corticosteroids confirmed a reaction with the same positivity score on all tested molecules. CONCLUSION: The positive reaction observed each time the patient's serum sample was incubated with RBCs in the presence of corticosteroids suggested that the triggering cause of hemolysis was an immune‐mediated mechanism and the drug responsible for DIIHA was hydrocortisone.     

Cisplatin-induced nonimmunologic adsorption of immunoglobulin by red cells

Antibodies to cisplatin, an extensively used anticancer chemotherapeutic agent, have been implicated previously as a cause of immune hemolytic anemia. Investigation of a suspected case of cisplatin-induced hemolytic anemia in a 40-year-old man demonstrated that IgG could be adsorbed nonimmunologically by reagent red cells in vitro. This phenomenon was found to be a source of possible error in the interpretation of studies identifying specific cisplatin antibodies. Furthermore, cisplatin was found to be capable of producing a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), owing to the nonspecific adsorption of immunoglobulin and complement in vivo. Although this finding did not result in acute hemolysis, it may cause confusion in the investigation of DAT-positive hemolytic anemias. We question whether previous reports of cisplatin-induced hemolytic anemia are accurate in their assessment that such hemolysis was mediated immunologically. Future studies of suspected cases of hemolysis induced by this drug should include serologic investigation adequate to demonstrate the presence of specific cisplatin antibodies. A positive DAT in such patients should not be considered proof of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia.     

Aquired immune hemolytic anemias

Aquired immune hemolytic anemias are classified in autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) of warm type, cold agglutinine disease, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. The autoantibodies in AIHA of warm type react most strongly at 37 degrees C (warm autoantibodies). They are of the IgG, less commonly of the IgM and IgA classes. The cause of autoimmunization remains obscure in 50% of the patients (idiopathic AIHA). In the remaining cases, the AIHA is associated with other diseases. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy, but most patients with AIHA of warm type require additional treatment with azathioprine or other drugs. Cold agglutinins are the cause of hemolysis in about 10% of patients with AIHA. Paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (Donath-Landsteiner) is less common and occur in children following infections. Drugs are the cause of hemolysis in about 10% of all cases with AIHA. The true incidence of alloimmune hemolytic anemias including neonatal immune hemolytic anemias is unknown. The paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is rare. It is caused by complement activation due to aquired membrane defects.     

Immune hemolytic anemia caused by sensitivity to a metabolite of etodolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

BACKGROUND: Immune hemolytic anemia can be caused by sensitivity to many different drugs. In some instances, the sensitizing compound can be identified by in vitro testing, but results are often negative. One reason for this is that a drug metabolite formed in vivo can be the sensitizing agent, but the responsible metabolites have rarely been identified at a chemical level. This report describes a patient who developed severe, Coombs-positive hemolytic anemia on two occasions after taking the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug etodolac. Studies were performed to characterize etodolac metabolites to which this patient was sensitive. CASE REPORT: Serum was tested for antibody in the presence and absence of drug using conventional methods and urine from individuals taking etodolac as a source of drug metabolites. Urinary metabolites of etodolac were identified by high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis. Glucuronide conjugates of etodolac and the 6-OH metabolite of etodolac were synthesized in a rat liver microsomal system to obtain reference standards. RESULTS: The patient's serum gave only trace (+/-) reactions with normal RBCs in the presence of etodolac but reacted strongly (4+) in the presence of urine from an individual taking this drug. The active urinary metabolites were identified as etodolac glucuronide and 6-OH etodolac glucuronide. CONCLUSION: This patient appears to have experienced acute, severe immune hemolytic anemia on two occasions because of sensitivity to the glucuronides of etodolac and 6-OH etodolac. In patients suspected of having drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, RBC-reactive antibodies can sometimes be detected by using urine from an individual taking the implicated medication as the source of drug metabolites in in vitro reactions. For patients who present with acute immune hemolysis, a careful history of drug exposure should be taken, and, where indicated, confirmatory testing should be performed to identify the sensitizing drug and prevent inadvertent reinduction of hemolysis at a later time.     

Immune hemolytic anemia due to cimetidine: the first example of a cimetidine antibody

BACKGROUND: Although there have been a few reports of immune hemolytic anemia (IHA) thought to be due to cimetidine, none of them provided proof (e.g., serologic detection of anti‐cimetidine and/or repeat of IHA upon drug rechallenge). One report used cimetidine as an example of how temporal associations of drug administration and hemolytic anemia are not proof of a cause‐effect relationship. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 63‐year‐old cancer patient developed IHA on two occasions after receiving cimetidine (with and without chemotherapy). Serologic methods included testing cimetidine‐treated red blood cells (RBCs) as well as testing untreated RBCs in the presence of cimetidine. RESULTS: The patient's direct antiglobulin test was positive (C3 only) and a serum antibody to cimetidine was detected by both testing methods. An eluate from the patient's RBCs was nonreactive. Cimetidine‐treated RBCs were optimally prepared at room temperature and needed to be tested on the day of preparation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of IHA due to a cimetidine antibody where a drug‐dependent antibody was demonstrated. The patient had IHA after receiving cimetidine on two separate occasions.     

Cefotetan disodium-induced hemolytic anemia.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of cefotetan disodium-induced hemolytic anemia. DATA SOURCES: Original research articles and case reports. DATA SYNTHESIS: A 46-year-old woman developed fulminant hemolytic anemia following a second exposure to intravenous cefotetan disodium for postoperative prophylaxis. She developed respiratory failure requiring intubation and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. The hemolysis was successfully treated with plasmapheresis, but the patient died on the 25th postoperative day. Positive Coomb's tests have been reported in less than three percent of patients receiving cefotetan. To our knowledge, this is the first case of fulminant hemolytic anemia associated with intravenous cefotetan disodium therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cefotetan should be added to the list of drugs known to cause hemolytic anemia. Monitoring for hemolysis should be considered for patients who receive multiple courses of therapy.     

Teicoplanin in cardiac surgery: intraoperative pharmacokinetics and concentrations in cardiac and mediastinal tissues.

The concentrations of teicoplanin in the sera and mediastinal and heart tissues of 23 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were measured after two regimens of teicoplanin administration. Intraoperative pharmacokinetic parameters were also obtained. Patients were randomized into two groups. Those in group 1 were given teicoplanin at 6 mg x kg(-1) intravenously at the time of induction of anesthesia. Patients in group 2 were given teicoplanin at 12 mg x kg(-1) during the same period. The maximum concentration in serum (71 +/- 20 and 131 +/- 44 mg x l(-1)), the minimum concentration in serum (3.6 +/- 1.3 and 6.8 +/- 2.1 mg x l(-1)), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 12 h (108 +/- 20 and 217 +/- 38 microg x h x ml(-1)), and the AUC from 0 h to infinity (154 +/- 36 and 292 +/- 77 microg x h x ml(-1)) were twice as high after 12-mg x kg(-1) injections as after 6-mg x kg(-1) injections. No differences in mean residence time (9.7 +/- 4.9 and 8.4 +/- 2.7 h) or terminal half-life (8.5 +/- 3.8 and 7.5 +/- 2.3 h) were observed. Teicoplanin penetrated mediastinal and heart tissues but not sternal bone, where the antibiotic was detectable in only 1 of 13 patients in group 1 and 2 of 10 patients in group 2. In group 1, 7 of 13 patients had teicoplanin concentrations in tissue that were lower than the MIC for 90% of the strains of potential pathogens tested (MIC90) that cause infection after cardiac surgery. All of the patients in group 2 but one had teicoplanin concentrations in tissue (other than in sternal bone) far in excess of the MIC90 for the potential pathogens. In conclusion, the 12-mg x kg(-1) regimen of teicoplanin is followed by a significant increase in teicoplanin concentrations in heart and mediastinal tissues and should be preferred to the 6-mg x kg(-1) regimen if teicoplanin is selected for antimicrobial prophylaxis in open heart surgery.     

Diclofenac-induced antibodies against RBCs and platelets: two case reports and a concise review

BACKGROUND: Diclofenac has frequently been implicated as the cause of immune hemolytic anemias and less frequently of immune thrombocytopenia. The presence of the causative antibodies has only been demonstrated in patients with immune hemolytic anemia, but not yet in patients with thrombocytopenia. The cases of two patients in whom diclofenac simultaneously induced antibodies against platelets and RBCs are reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The investigation was carried out with standard serologic tests for detection of antibodies against platelets and RBCs. The patients' sera were tested in the presence and absence of diclofenac and its metabolites. RESULTS: One of the two patients developed severe hemolysis and significant thrombocytopenic purpura. The other patient developed significant thrombocytopenia but no hemolysis. Both patients had a positive DAT and drug- and/or metabolite-dependent antibodies against RBCs and platelets. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings and those of other investigators, we believe that diclofenac leads to the production of antibodies against RBCs and/or platelets.     

Hemolytic anemia and plasma exchange

Hemolytic anemia is a disease caused by autoantibodies and resulting in various complaints and clinical symptoms. In about half of cases, the cause of autoimmune hemolytic anemia can not be determined. Corticosteroids are the first-line treatment option for warm autoantibody-related hemolytic anemia. In patients who develop steroid side effects or do not respond adequately, other immunosuppressives may be preferred. In case a rapid response is required or fulminant hemolysis occur, human immunoglobulins (IVIGs) may be added to treatment. Finally, plasma exchange (PE) may additionally be utilised. The essence of PE is based on the removal of immune complexes, protein-bound toxins, autoantibodies and high molecular weight solutes and protein-bound solutes. The main clinical aim of the removal of solutes is usually to gain a faster response than immunosuppressive therapy. Studies related to hemolytic anemia and PE are usually based on case reports. Our case report is about a patient with severe IgG subtype hemolytic anemia. The treatment was started with 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone; to which there was no response with weekly rituximab 375 mg/m² and IVIG administered. Because of unresponsiveness to all of the immunosuppresives, a total of 5 sessions of PE were added to the treatment procedure every other day. After these sessions, the requirement for transfusions has decreased and the patient underwent splenectomy. The patient is currently being followed up only on oral cyclosporine and the last hemoglobin level was 14.7 g /dl. In severe and refractory anemia, especially in the case of cardiovascular imbalance in fulminant hemolysis, PE may be preferred as a third series option after immunosuppressive treatments and play a role as a bridge to splenectomy.     

Splenic abscess caused by MRSA developing in an infarcted area: case report and literature review

We report a case of a 41-year-old man with a splenic abscess caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). He had been treated with antimicrobials and corticosteroids for interstitial pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and hemolytic anemia. He developed catheter-related (MRSA) bacteremia during his stay in the ICU and was treated with teicoplanin for 2 weeks. After 4 weeks of outpatient follow-up, he was readmitted to the hospital with fever and pain in the left upper quadrant. A thoracoabdominal CT scan showed subcapsular collection in areas of splenic infarction that had been detected on his first admission. CT-guided percutaneous aspiration resulted in the isolation of MRSA. The patient was treated successfully with teicoplanin for 6 weeks. Our aim in presenting this quite rare case is to highlight the tendency of infarcts that develop as a result of hemolytic attacks during systemic infections to be a focus of infection for nosocomial bacteremia.     

Agranulocytosis and hemolytic anemia in patients with renal cell cancer treated with interleukin-12

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a cytokine with effects on immune function and hematopoiesis. In this article, the authors describe two patients with renal cell cancer in whom grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 hemolytic anemia developed, respectively, during treatment with twice-weekly intravenous recombinant human interleukin-12 (rhIL-12) during a phase 1 trial. The severe neutropenia was associated with bone marrow agranulocytosis and a preponderance of large granular lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, whereas the hemolytic anemia was negative for the Coombs test and associated with splenomegaly. The agranulocytosis and hemolytic anemia persisted after the rhIL-12 was stopped, but both subsequently responded to treatment with cyclophosphamide. steroids, or both. These findings indicate that rhIL-12 can induce unique hematologic toxic effects that can be reversed with immunosuppressive drugs.     

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia in childhood: serologic features in 100 cases

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) autoimmunization is a relatively uncommon cause of anemia in children and presents some differences from those of adults. Due to its frequency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) in childhood has prompted very few studies, and the literature consists mostly of sporadic case histories. The objective of this study was to stress the importance of an appropriate serologic diagnosis in suspected cases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This report describes the immunohematologic features of 100 patients with AIHA studied in the Immunohaematologic Unit of Blood Bank, "La Sapienza" University of Rome. The patients were diagnosed in the same department from 1983 to 2003. RESULTS: The peak incidence of AIHA was in the first 4 years of life. No sex predominance was noted. Warm AIHA was the most common type of acquired immune hemolytic anemia; it comprised 64 of the 100 patients, whereas 26 patients showed a cold AIHA. Associated AIHA showed a slightly more frequent incidence (54/100) compared to idiopathic forms of AIHA (46/100). CONCLUSIONS: In this study serologic records of 100 children with confirmed AIHA are reported. This series, much larger than any previously reported, is critically reviewed and analyzed to delineate the immunologic features of the disease in childhood.     

A fatal case of ceftriaxone (Rocephin)-induced hemolytic anemia associated with intravascular immune hemolysis

Fatal hemolytic anemia developed in a 52-year-old woman who was treated with a cephalosporin, ceftriaxone. The patient's red cells (RBCs) were coated with C3, but no RBC-bound IgG, IgA, or IgM was detected. Her serum contained an antibody that did not react with cephalosporin- coated RBCs but reacted strongly with RBCs in vitro when her serum was added to drug and RBCs. This is the first case of immune hemolytic anemia associated with ceftriaxone, the first case of fatal cephalosporin-induced hemolytic anemia, and the second case in which a cephalosporin antibody showed in vitro and in vivo characteristics usually thought to be associated with the so-called immune complex mechanism.     

自身免疫性溶血性贫血的免疫分型及临床分析

目的 对64例自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)患者血液中红细胞上结合的抗体进行免疫分型,进一步指导临床治疗.方法 采用免疫分型技术及相关溶血性贫血系列检测法.结果 发病较多的是青壮年,女性多于男性,类型分布以IgG C3型多见,且贫血、溶血程度重,余依次为C3型、IgG型.结论 AIHA免疫分型可判定疾病的严重程度以及为临床治疗提供依据.     

Anti-AnWj causing acute hemolytic transfusion reactions in a patient with aplastic anemia

BACKGROUND: AnWj is a high‐prevalence red blood cell (RBC) antigen in the ISBT 901 series. Only nine reports of anti‐AnWj have been published since it was first documented in 1972; two of these cases involved transfusion reactions. We present a case of a patient with aplastic anemia who developed anti‐AnWj with clinically significant hemolysis after transfusion of AnWj‐positive RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 56‐year‐old woman with aplastic anemia developed a pan‐reactive antibody with clinically significant hemolysis after transfusion of RBCs. Investigations included antibody identification by serologic methods at the national immunohematology reference laboratory and the in vitro monocyte‐monolayer assay (MMA) to predict clinical significance. RESULTS: The antibody was identified as having specificity for the AnWj antigen. The posttransfusion MMA indicated that the antibody had complement‐fixing capability highly likely to cause clinically significant acute hemolytic transfusion reactions. The patient required long‐term transfusion support with AnWj‐negative RBCs and Lu(a?b?) RBCs of the In(Lu) type which have reduced AnWj expression. Cross‐Canada and international collaboration was required to obtain rare units for transfusion. CONCLUSION: A case of acute hemolytic transfusion reaction caused by anti‐AnWj is reported in a patient with aplastic anemia requiring allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This is the second documented case of anti‐AnWj to cause a hemolytic transfusion reaction. The case demonstrates the complexity of managing patients with rare antibodies and the importance of international collaboration in the management of these difficult cases.     

Fetal hemolytic anemia and intrauterine death caused by anti-M immunization

BACKGROUND: Antibodies with anti-M specificity are detected in 10 percent of pregnant women with a positive antibody screen, but anti-M is only rarely associated with hemolytic anemia in the fetus. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study reports on three pregnancies in one family that all resulted in severe fetal anemia. The first fetus died in utero with hydrops fetalis during the 20th gestational week and the second child was delivered after 28 weeks of gestation with hydrops fetalis and a hemoglobin level of 16 g per L whereas the third affected child was treated with intrauterine red cell (RBC) transfusions before delivery at 28 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The direct antiglobulin test was negative but anti-M in a low titer was detected through the three pregnancies, and its clinical relevance, which initially was uncertain, was confirmed by pronounced in vivo hemolysis in maternal blood of chromate ((51)Cr)-labeled M+ RBCs and normal survival of (51)Cr labeled M- RBCs. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that anti-M immunization in a few cases may cause severe fetal hemolytic anemia and intrauterine death. It remains to be elucidated why a normally clinically insignificant antibody is this aggressive in a small proportion of cases. Because the condition is treatable, anti-M must be considered as a possible cause of fetal anemia and intrauterine death.