Betel quid without tobacco as a risk factor for oral precancers

The IARC monographs recently classified chewing betel quid without tobacco as a human carcinogen. Several studies in Taiwan have reported that betel quid without tobacco may increase the risk of oral precancers such as oral leukoplakia and oral submucous fibrosis. However in India, since most betel quid chewers prefer to add tobacco to the quid, the independent effect of betel quid on the risk of oral precancers is difficult to assess and has not yet been fully explored. We conducted a large case-control study in Kerala, India, including 927 oral leukoplakia cases, 170 oral submucous fibrosis cases, 100 erythroplakia cases, 115 multiple oral precancer cases and 47,773 controls. The focus of this reanalysis is on the minority of individuals who chewed betel quid without tobacco. Among nonsmokers and nondrinkers, chewing betel quid without tobacco conferred ORs of 22.2 (95%CI = 11.3, 43.7) for oral leukoplakia, 56.2 (95%CI = 21.8, 144.8) for oral submucous fibrosis, 29.0 (95%CI = 5.63, 149.5) for erythroplakia and 28.3 (95%CI = 6.88, 116.7) for multiple oral precancers, after adjustment for age, sex, education and BMI. Dose-response relationships were observed for both the frequency and duration of betel quid chewing without tobacco on the risk of oral precancers. In conclusion, our study supports the hypothesis that chewing betel quid without tobacco elevates the risks of various oral precancers.     

Betel quid not containing tobacco and oral cancer: a report on a case-control study in Papua New Guinea and a meta-analysis of current evidence

Smoking and betel quid chewing are associated with increased risk of oral cancer but few studies have reported on associations in populations where betel quid does not contain tobacco. We conducted a case-control study in Papua New Guinea and a systematic review. Our case-control study recruited 143 cases with oral cancer and 477 controls. We collected information on smoking and betel quid chewing. Current smoking was associated with an increased risk of oral cancer with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for daily smokers of 2.63 (95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 1.32, 5.22) and amongst heaviest smokers of 4.63 (95% CI 2.07, 10.36) compared to never-smokers. Betel chewing was associated with increased risk of oral cancer with an adjusted OR for current chewers of 2.03 (95% CI 1.01, 4.09) and in the heaviest chewers of 2.47 (95% CI 1.13, 5.40) compared to nonchewers. The OR in those who both smoked tobacco and chewed betel quid was 4.85 (95% 1.10, 22.25), relative to those who neither smoked nor chewed. The systematic review identified 10 previous studies that examined risk of oral cancer associated with betel quid chewing that controlled for smoking in populations where betel quid did not contain tobacco. In studies that reported results for non-smokers the combined OR was 2.14 (95% CI 1.06, 4.32) in betel quid chewers and in studies that adjusted for smoking the combined OR was 3.50 (95% CI 2.16, 5.65) in betel quid chewers. Preventive efforts should discourage betel quid chewing as well as smoking.     

Different impact from betel quid, alcohol and cigarette: risk factors for pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer

The risks of betel quid chewing with or without tobacco, alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking have been well explored in the oral cavity but not in the pharynx and larynx. We conducted a case-control study to investigate the association of these three risk factors to cancers of the pharynx and larynx in Taiwan. A total cases of 148 pharyngeal cancer, 128 laryngeal cancer and 255 hospital controls, all men, were recruited. Betel quid chewing was a significant independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.1-15.0) similar to that of alcohol drinking (aOR = 6.6; 95% CI = 3.5-13.0) for pharyngeal cancer, but not for laryngeal cancer (aOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 0.7-2.5) on which cigarette smoking (aOR = 7.1) exerts a stronger significant independent risk than alcohol drinking (aOR = 3.8). For pharyngeal cancers, chewers who consumed >20 quid/day, chewed with inflorescence in the quid or swallowed the betel quid juice were at higher risks; significant dose-response effects were found in daily quantity of drinking and chewing, and cumulative quantity of drinking. Synergistic effects from the 3 risk factors existed both on the pharynx (aOR = 96.9) and the larynx (aOR = 40.3), and attributed for 93.1% and 92.9% respectively. Our study is the first evidence to show that betel quid chewing without tobacco has different impact on the pharynx (digestive tract) and the larynx (airway), and supports the concept that exposure quantity and direct mucosal contact with the betel quid juice may contribute to carcinogenesis. Our results show an important insight into the impact of betel quid chewing on other sites of the digestive tract other than the oral cavity.     

A review of betel quid chewing, oral cancer and precancer in Mainland China

On the Chinese mainland, betel quid (BQ) chewing is common in the Hunan and Hainan provinces. The BQ chewing habit in Hunan consists of dried husks and betel nuts, which are sold as industrially packaged, areca nut-based products. In Hainan, the fresh nut is chewed. Tobacco is not added. Reported prevalence of BQ chewing in Hunan province is high (64.5-82.7%). Oral diseases associated with BQ chewing are oral submucous fibrosis (OSF), oral leukoplakia (OL) and oral cancer. Reported prevalence of OSF among BQ chewers ranges from 0.9% to 4.7%. People most commonly affected are between the ages of 30 and 39 years, and 40 and 49 years. The reported prevalence of OL in Hainan ranges from 2.1% to 2.5%. In BQ chewers who also smoke, the reported prevalence is 20.3%. The prevalence of OL in Hunan province ranges from 0.1% to 0.5%. The prevalence of oral cancer among BQ chewers is low, ranging from 0.02% to 0.05%. In cases of OSF, reported prevalence is 2.6% and 1.2%. Presently, data on prevalence of BQ chewing in southern provinces of Mainland China is limited. BQ chewing habits, however, seem to differ between geographic areas. Future case-control studies are necessary to evaluate the risk for oral cancer and other associated oral mucosal diseases resulting from variations in BQ chewing habits.     

Tobacco (Kretek) Smoking,Betel Quid Chewing and Risk of Oral Cancer in a Selected Jakarta Population

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the association between tobacco consumption (kretek) and betel quidchewing with oral cancer risk. Materials and Methods: A total of 81 cases of oral cancers were matched with162 controls in this hospital-based study. Information on sociodemographic characteristics and details of riskhabits (duration, frequency and type of tobacco consumption and betel quid chewing) were collected. Associationbetween smoking and betel quid chewing with oral cancer were analysed using conditional logistic regression.Results: Slightly more than half of the cases (55.6%) were smokers where 88.9% of them smoked kretek. Afteradjusting for confounders, smokers have two fold increased risk, while the risk for kretek consumers and thosesmoking for more than 10 years was increased to almost three-fold. Prevalence of betel quid chewing among casesand controls was low (7.4% and 1.9% respectively). Chewing of at least one quid per day, and quid combinationof betel leaf, areca nut, lime and tobacco conferred a 5-6 fold increased risk. Conclusions: Smoking is positivelyassociated with oral cancer risk. A similar direct association was also seen among betel quid chewers.     

Impact of oral submucous fibrosis on chemotherapy-induced mucositis for head and neck cancer in a geographic area in which betel quid chewing is prevalent.

In Southeast Asia and Taiwan, betel quid chewing is prevalent. Patients with head and neck cancer who chewed betel quid habitually seem to experience more severe chemotherapy-induced mucositis in our clinical practice. To validate this issue, patients with untreated head and neck cancer who received cisplatin (cDDP) plus a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this analysis. Information on the consumption of betel quid, tobacco, and alcohol were recorded before chemotherapy. Oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) was diagnosed clinically according to the fibrotic appearance of the mucosa and trismus. Mucositis was scored according to the World Health Organization criteria, and the mucositis score of the first course of chemotherapy was used for analysis. From December 1993 to April 1996, 120 patients were enrolled in this trial. Neither the betel quid chewing nor the cancer of the oral cavity was to be a significant factor for mucositis. However, clinically diagnosed OSF was found to display a significant correlation with more severe mucositis (p = 0.02). We concluded that in betel quid chewing-prevalent areas, OSF was a risk factor of more severe mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated by CDDP and 5-FU-based regimens.     

Characteristics of mutations in the p53 gene in oral squamous cell carcinoma associated with betel quid chewing and cigarette smoking in Taiwanese

p53 mutations are etiologically associated with the development of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) or are associated with exposure to specific carcinogens. In this study, we used PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing to analyze the conserved regions of the p53 gene (exons 5-9) in OSCC tumor specimens from 187 patients with varied histories of betel quid, tobacco and alcohol use. Ninety-one of the 187 OSCCs (48.66%) showed p53 gene mutations at exons 5-9. The incidence of p53 mutations was not associated with age, sex, TNM stage, status of cigarette smoking or betel quid chewing. However, alcohol drinkers exhibited a significantly higher incidence (57/101, 56.44%) of p53 mutations than non-users (39.53%, 34/86) (P = 0.02). The effect of alcohol on the incidence of p53 mutations was still statistically significant (RR = 2.24; 95% CI, 1.21-4.15) after adjustment for cigarette smoking and betel quid (BQ) chewing. G:C to A:T transitions were the predominant mutations observed and associated with BQ and tobacco use. Alcohol drinking could enhance these transitions. After adjustment for cigarette smoking and BQ chewing, alcohol drinking still showed an independent effect on G:C to A:T transitions (RR = 2.41; 95% CI, 1.01-5.74). These findings strongly suggest an important contributive role of tobacco carcinogens to p53 mutation in this series of Taiwanese OSCCs and alcohol might enhance these mutagenic effects. As safrole-DNA adducts have been detected in 77% (23/30) of the OSCC tissues from Taiwanese oral cancer patients with a BQ chewing history, we cannot rule out the possibility that safrole or other carcinogens present in the BQ may cause a similar pattern of mutagenesis. Determination of the role of safrole and other carcinogens present in BQ on the pattern of p53 gene mutation in OSCC will require further study.     

Chewing areca nut, betel quid, oral snuff, cigarette smoking and the risk of oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in South Asians: a multicentre case-control study

Oesophageal cancer remains an important public health problem worldwide. This multicentre matched case-control study examined the chewing areca nut alone, betel quid with tobacco, oral snuff (snuff dipping) and cigarette smoking as the risk factors for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. We enrolled 91 cases of oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and 364 matched controls from three tertiary-care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data through face-to-face interview of the participants. Multivariable conditional logistic regression model showed that after adjusting for the effect of ethnicity, ever chewed areca nut alone (adjusted matched odds ratio (mOR(adj))=3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-8.5), ever chewed betel quid with tobacco (mOR(adj)=12.8; 95% CI: 6.3-26.2), ever practiced snuff dipping (mOR(adj)=4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.7) and ever smoked cigarettes (mOR(adj)=2.9; 95% CI: 1.4-5.9) were significantly and independently associated with oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma status. The adjusted summary population attributable risk (PAR) percent for all four substances together was 67.0. Furthermore, despite incomplete synergy, there was manifold increase in the risk of oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, if the respondents ever smoked cigarettes and ever chewed betel quid with tobacco (mOR(adj)=21.4; 95% CI: 6.3-72.4) or if they ever smoked cigarettes and ever practiced snuff dipping (mOR(adj)=14.4; 95% CI: 2.3-91.1). The adjusted PAR (%) was higher for the dual practice of smoking cigarettes and chewing betel quid with tobacco (64.3) than the dual practice of smoking cigarettes and snuff dipping (32.2). Public awareness to curtail the addiction to these substances may result in a substantial reduction in the incidence of oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and related mortality in this and similar settings.     

Betel quid not containing tobacco and oral leukoplakia: a report on a cross-sectional study in Papua New Guinea and a meta-analysis of current evidence

Leukoplakia is an asymptomatic, potentially malignant change in the oral mucosa. Previous studies have reported that smoking and betel quid chewing are associated with increased risk of leukoplakia; few studies have reported on these associations in populations where betel quid does not contain tobacco. We conducted a case-control study nested in a cross-sectional study in Papua New Guinea and a systematic review of studies that included chewers of betel quid without tobacco. Our study recruited 1,670 adults. We recorded betel quid chewing and smoking. The prevalence of leukoplakia was 11.7%. In the nested case-control study of 197 cases and 1,282 controls, current betel chewing was associated with increased risk of leukoplakia with an adjusted odds ratio for current chewers of 3.8 (95% CI 1.7, 8.4) and in the heaviest chewers of 4.1 (95% CI 1.8, 9.1) compared to non-chewers. Current smoking was associated with an increased risk of leukoplakia with an adjusted odds ratio for current smokers of 6.4 (95% CI 4.1, 9.9) and amongst heaviest smokers of 9.8 (95% CI 5.9, 16.4) compared to non-smokers. The systematic review identified 5 studies examining risk of leukoplakia associated with betel quid chewing in populations where betel quid did not contain tobacco and that controlled for smoking. In studies that adjusted for smoking, the combined random effect odds ratio was 7.9 (95% CI 4.3, 14.6) in betel quid chewers. The results of this study and systematic review of similar studies provide evidence of the role of betel quid not containing tobacco and leukoplakia.     

Exclusive use of different types of tobacco products,exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and risk of subtypes of head and neck cancer among Indian males

Tobacco products are used in vary many forms in India. Although the risk of tobacco uses in developing head and neck cancer (HNC) is known, risk by exclusive use of different tobacco products on HNC and its subtypes is poorly understood. A case-control study was conducted at a tertiary cancer hospital, which receives cases from different geographical regions of India with use of different types of tobacco products. The study included 824 oral cavity (OC), 149 oropharynx (OPX) 104 hypopharyngeal (HPX) and 81 larynx (LX) cancer cases and 1206 visitor controls. Information on 11 different types of tobacco products and exposure to secondhand smoke was collected through structured questionnaires. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the association of various HNC subtypes with exclusive use of each tobacco product compared to nonusers of tobacco were estimated using logistic regression models, after adjusting for potential confounders. Exclusive use of any type of smokeless tobacco product was strongly associated with all subtypes of HNC. Gutka chewing (only) had highest risk (OR = 33.67; 95% CI = 19.8-57.0) while exclusive users of betel quid with tobacco (BQ + T), tobacco quid, Khaini, Mawa and Mishri users had a OR of 14.77, 24.20, 5.33, 2.96 and 3.32, respectively, for development of OC. Bidi smoking and secondhand smoke was independently associated with increased risk of HNC. Our study indicates that tobacco control policies should focus on product specific awareness messaging that switching between tobacco product types is not a safe alternative to complete cessation.     

Impact of RECK gene polymorphisms and environmental factors on oral cancer susceptibility and clinicopathologic characteristics in Taiwan

Oral cancer is the fourth common male cancer and causally associated with environmental carcinogens in Taiwan. The reversion-inducing-cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK) has a significant effect on tumorigenesis by limiting angiogenesis and invasion of tumors through the extracellular matrix. RECK downregulation has been confirmed in many human cancers and associated with lymph node metastasis clinically. In the present hospital-based case-controlled study, the demographic, RECK genotype and clinicopathologic data from 341 male oral cancer patients and 415 cancer-free controls were investigated. We found that RECK rs10814325, rs16932912, rs11788747 or rs10972727 polymorphisms were not associated with oral cancer susceptibility. Among 488 smokers, RECK polymorphisms carriers with betel quid chewing have a 7.62-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.96-19.64] to 25.33-fold (95% CI, 9.57-67.02) risk to have oral cancer compared with RECK wild-type carrier without betel quid chewing. Among 352 betel quid chewers, RECK polymorphisms carriers with smoking have a 6.68-fold (95% CI, 1.21-36.93) to 18.57-fold (95% CI, 3.80-90.80) risk to have oral cancer compared with those who carried wild-type without smoking. In 263 betel quid chewing oral cancer patients, RECK rs10814325 polymorphism have a 2.26-fold (95% CI, 1.19-4.29) risk to have neck lymph node metastasis compared with RECK wild-type carrier. These results support that gene-environment interactions between the RECK polymorphisms, smoking and betel quid may alter oral cancer susceptibility and metastasis.     

Family History of Cancer and Head and Neck Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether family history of cancer is associated with head and neck cancer risk in a Chinese population. Materials and Methods: This case-control study included 921 cases and 806 controls. Recruitment was from December 2010 to January 2015 in eight centers in East Asia. Controls were matched to cases with reference to sex, 5-year age group, ethnicity, and residence area at each of the centers. Results: We observed an increased risk of head and neck cancer due to first degree family history of head and neck cancer, but after adjustment for tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and betel quid chewing the association was no longer apparent. The adjusted OR were 1.10 (95% CI=0.80-1.50) for family history of tobacco-related cancer and 0.96 (95%CI=0.75-1.24) for family history of any cancer with adjustment for tobacco, betel quid and alcohol habits. The ORs for having a first-degree relative with HNC were higher in all tobacco/ alcohol subgroups. Conclusions: We did not observe a strong association between family history of head and neck cancer and head and neck cancer risk after taking into account lifestyle factors. Our study suggests that an increased risk due to family history of head and neck cancer may be due to shared risk factors. Further studies may be needed to assess the lifestyle factors of the relatives.     

Risk of betel chewing for oesophageal cancer in Taiwan

Among 104 cases of squamous-cell oesophageal carcinoma patients and 277 controls in Taiwan, after adjusting for cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and other confounders, we found that subjects who chewed from 1 to 495 betel-year and more than 495 betel-years (about 20 betel quid per day for 20 years) had 3.6-fold (95% Cl = 1.3-10.1) and 9.2-fold risk (95% Cl = 1.8-46.7), respectively, of developing oesophageal cancer, compared to those who did not chew betel.     

Impact of betel quid, tobacco and alcohol on three-stage disease natural history of oral leukoplakia and cancer: implication for prevention of oral cancer.

The natural history of the three-stage process from normal, oral leukoplakia to oral cancer in relation to betel quid chewing, smoking and drinking is rarely addressed. The aim of this study was to simultaneously quantify the effects of three risk factors on occurrence of oral leukoplakia and malignant transformation to oral cancer. A hospital-based case-control study design derived from three retrospective cohorts from 1988 to 1998 was conducted. A total of 74 oral cancer patients, 164 patients with oral leukoplakia and 187 controls were interviewed to collect information on their betel chewing, smoking and drinking habits. The effects of the three risk factors on the progression rates of the three-stage disease process were estimated using the three-state Markov model. Subjects who chewed betel quid were at greater risk of leukoplakia (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 17.7 (9.03-34.5)) but there was no significant effect on malignant transformation (OR 1.04 (0.61-1.76)). Smoking played a major role in the onset of leukoplakia (OR 4.26 (2.21-8.23)) but a minor role in malignant transformation (OR 1.36 (0.69-2.68)). Alcohol was positively associated with malignant transformation (OR 2.37 (1.47-3.82)) but unrelated to occurrence of leukoplakia (OR 0.76 (0.04-1.43)). We concluded that smoking and betel quid were two significant risk factors for the occurrence of leukoplakia, whereas alcohol was significantly responsible for malignant transformation.     

Betel Quid Chewing and Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers: A Prospective Cohort Study in Khon Kaen,Thailand

Background: This study aimed to determine the association between betel quid chewing and the occurrenceof upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancers. Methods: A cohort of 17,388 subjects, recruited and interviewedover the 1990-2001 period, in Khon Kaen, Thailand, was followed up until 2011. The data were linked to theKhon Kaen Population-Based Cancer Registry. Results: The prevalence of betel quid chewing was 15.9%, with afemale predominance (97.7%); the mean age of chewers was 57.7 years (SD 6.6). The overall incidence of UADTcancers from the cohort was 14.7 per 100,000 person-years, whereas the incidence among the chewers was 45.7.Betel nut chewing was the only major risk factor for UADT cancers in this population (HR=5.26, 95%CI=2.51-11.0), while weak associations were found for tobacco smoking and alcohol (HR=1.16, 95%CI=0.45-3.01 and 1.47,95%CI=0.72-3.03 respectively). Conclusions: We found betel quid chewing to be a main risk factor for UADTcancers, resulting in a higher incidence in females. However, further study is required to explore the potentialr isk factors among non-chewers, non-smokers, and non-drinkers     

Ortho- and meta-tyrosine formation from phenylalanine in human saliva as a marker of hydroxyl radical generation during betel quid chewing

The habit of betel quid chewing, common in South-East Asia andthe South Pacific islands, is causally associated with an increasedrisk of oral cancer. Reactive oxygen species formed from polyphenolicbetel quid ingredients and lime at alkaline pH have been implicatedas the agents responsible for DNA and tissue damage. To determinewhether hydroxyl radical (HO) is generated in the human oralcavity during chewing of betel quid, the formation of o- andm-tyrosine from L-phenylalanine was measured, Both o- and m-tyrosinewere formed in vitro in the presence of extracts of areca nutand/or catechu, transition metal ions such as Cu²⁺ and Fe²⁺and lime or sodium carbonate (alkaline pH). Omission of anyof these ingredients from the reaction mixture significantlyreduced the yield of tyrosines. Hydroxyl radical scavengerssuch as ethanol, D-mannitol and dimethylsulfoxide inhibitedthe phenylalanine oxidation in a dose-dependent fashion. Fivevolunteers chewed betel quid consisting of betel leaf, arecanut, catechu and slaked lime (without tobacco). Their saliva,collected after chewing betel quid, contained high concentrationsof p-tyrosine, but no appreciable amounts of o- or m-tyrosine.Saliva samples from the same subjects after chewing betel quidto which 20 mg phenylalanine had been added contained o- andm-tyrosine at concentrations ranging from 1010 to 3000 nM andfrom 1110 to 3140 nM respectively. These levels were significantlyhigher (P< 0.005) than those of subjects who kept phenylalaninein the oral cavity without betel quid, which ranged from 14to 70 nM for o-tyrosine and from 10 to 35 nM for m-tyrosine.These studies clearly demonstrate that the HO radical is formedin the human oral cavity during betel quid chewing and is probablyimplicated in the genetic damage that has been observed in oralepithelial cells of chewers.     

Risk Factors for Oral Cancer in Northeast Thailand

Oral cancer is a common site of head and neck cancer, and is relatively frequent in Northeast Thailand.The objective of this hospital-based, case-control study was to determine associations with risk factors. A totalof 104 oral cancer cases diagnosed between July 2010 and April 2011 in 3 hospitals were matched with controlsubjects by age, sex and hospital. Data were collected by personal interview. There were significant associationsbetween oral cancer and tobacco smoking (OR=4.47; 95%CI=2.00 to 9.99), alcohol use among women (OR=4.16;95%CI=1.70 to 10.69), and betel chewing (OR=9.01; 95%CI=3.83 to 21.22), and all three showed dose-responseeffects. Smoking is rare among Thai women (none of the control women were smokers), but betel chewing,especially among older women, is relatively common. We did not find any association between practicing oralsex and oral cancer.     

Chromosome-damaging activity of saliva of betel nut and tobacco chewers

Saliva of volunteers chewing betel quid, cured betel nut (Areca catechu), betel leaves (Piper betle), a mixture of quid ingredients (dried betel nut flakes, catechu, cardamon, lime, copra and menthol) and Indian tobacco was collected and examined for its genotoxic activity. Chromosome aberrations (chromatid breaks and chromatid exchanges) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were used to estimate the genotoxic effect. No detectable levels of clastogenic activity were observed in the saliva of non-chewing individuals. After 5 min of chewing betel quid, betel nut, betel leaves, quid ingredients and Indian tobacco, the saliva samples showed relatively potent clastogenic activities. The addition of transition metals Mn²⁺ and Cu²⁺ to the saliva samples of betel nut and Indian tobacco chewers enhanced their clastogenic activities, whereas Fe³⁺ increased the clastogenicity of the betel nut saliva but decreased the genotoxic effect of the saliva of Indian tobacco chewers. After removal of the betel quid or its components from the mouth, the clastogenic activity disappeared within 5 min. The western-type chewing tobacco did not produce a genotoxic activity in the saliva of chewers. A possible association between the genotoxicity in the saliva of betel quid chewers and the development of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal carcinomas is discussed.     

Expression of p53 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and its association with risk habits in southern Thailand

Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking are the principal factors associated with p53 expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) in the west, whereas betel quid chewing and smokeless tobacco are important factors in the east. Variable results of p53 expression have been reported and it has been proposed that ethnic difference and a variation in the indigenous oral habit may be responsible for the finding. This study, therefore, investigated p53 expression among 106 OSCC patients from a southern Thailand population in which all four risk behaviours, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, betel quid chewing and use of smokeless tobacco, are practised. The associations of p53 expression with lifetime exposure to each risk behaviour were explored. Multivariate modelling showed that lifetime exposure to alcohol drinking was significantly positively associated with p53 expression (likelihood ratio P value 0.01). Betel quid chewing and tobacco smoking habit showed a trend of decreasing risk of p53 expression with increased lifetime exposure (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-1.00 and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.98, respectively). No significant association was found between p53 expression and clinico-pathological parameters. Further investigations are needed to study (1) the molecular alteration of p53 in each risk habit and (2) other possible pathways of oral carcinogenesis in betel quid- and tobacco smoking-associated OSCC in these group of patients.     

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic significance of betel quid chewing in squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa in Taiwan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While betel quid (BQ) chewing is clearly the most avoidable risk factor of squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa (BMSCC), little is known about the influence of this habit on the prognosis of BMSCC. METHODS: We surveyed 280 patients with BMSCC who were treated during an 8-year period in a cohort study to assess the independent predictive value of pretreatment BQ chewing habit on the prognosis by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We found by univariate analysis that sex, age, clinical stage, smoking, and BQ chewing significantly affected the patients' prognosis and only age, clinical stage, and BQ chewing had significant influence on prognosis by multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). Further analysis revealed that the prognostic effect of BQ chewing changed in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The risk of death was 31.4-fold higher in heavy user (duration >30 years, daily consumption >30 quids, age of start <20 years old) when compared to those who chewed BQ to a milder degree (duration <10 years, daily consumption <15 quids, age of start > or =20 years old ) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment BQ chewing habit worsens the prognosis of BMSCC in Taiwan. BQ chewing is a prognostic indicator that can be used in conjunction with clinical staging to help plan the treatment for the patients.