mTOR inhibition, the second generation: ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitor initiates unexpected receptor tyrosine kinase-driven feedback loop

mTOR inhibition with the ATP-competitive kinase inhibitor AZD8055 induces receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent feedback activation of AKT.     

mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 enhances the immunotherapeutic activity of an agonist CD40 antibody in cancer treatment

mTOR is a central mediator of cancer cell growth, but it also directs immune cell differentiation and function. On this basis, we had explored the hypothesis that mTOR inhibition can enhance cancer immunotherapy. Here, we report that a combination of αCD40 agonistic antibody and the ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitory drug AZD8055 elicited synergistic antitumor responses in a model of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In contrast to the well-established mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, AZD8055 increased the infiltration, activation, and proliferation of CD8(+) T cells and natural killer cells in liver metastatic foci when combined with the CD40 agonist. AZD8055/αCD40-treated mice also display an increased incidence of matured macrophages and dendritic cells compared with that achieved in mice by αCD40 or AZD8055 treatment alone. We found that the combination treatment also increased macrophage production of TNFα, which played an indispensable role in activation of the observed antitumor immune response. Levels of Th1 cytokines, including interleukin 12, IFN-γ, TNFα, and the Th1-associated chemokines RANTES, MIG, and IP-10 were each elevated significantly in the livers of mice treated with the combinatorial therapy versus individual treatments. Notably, the AZD8055/αCD40-induced antitumor response was abolished in IFN-γ(-/-) and CD40(-/-) mice, establishing the reliance of the combination therapy on host IFN-γ and CD40 expression. Our findings offer a preclinical proof of concept that, unlike rapamycin, the ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 can contribute with αCD40 treatment to trigger a restructuring of the tumor immune microenvironment to trigger regressions of an established metastatic cancer.     

Heat shock protein 90 inhibitor NVP‐AUY922 exerts potent activity against adult T‐cell leukemia–lymphoma cells

Adult T‐cell leukemia–lymphoma (ATL), an aggressive neoplasm etiologically associated with HTLV‐1, is a chemoresistant malignancy. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is involved in folding and functions as a chaperone for multiple client proteins, many of which are important in tumorigenesis. In this study, we examined NVP‐AUY922 (AUY922), a second generation isoxazole‐based non‐geldanamycin HSP90 inhibitor, and confirmed its effects on survival of ATL‐related cell lines. Analysis using FACS revealed that AUY922 induced cell‐cycle arrest and apoptosis; it also inhibited the growth of primary ATL cells, but not of normal PBMCs. AUY922 caused strong upregulation of HSP70, a surrogate marker of HSP90 inhibition, and a dose‐dependent decrease in HSP90 client proteins associated with cell survival, proliferation, and cell cycle in the G₁ phase, including phospho‐Akt, Akt, IKKα, IKKβ, IKKγ, Cdk4, Cdk6, and survivin. Interestingly, AUY922 induced downregulation of the proviral integration site for Moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM) in ATL cells. The PIM family (PIM‐1, ‐2, ‐3) is made up of oncogenes that encode a serine/threonine protein kinase family. As PIM kinases have multiple functions involved in cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, apoptosis, and tumorigenesis, their downregulation could play an important role in AUY922‐induced death of ATL cells. In fact, SGI‐1776, a pan‐PIM kinase inhibitor, successfully inhibited the growth of primary ATL cells as well as ATL‐related cell lines. Our findings suggest that AUY922 is an effective therapeutic agent for ATL, and PIM kinases may be a novel therapeutic target.     

HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 can reverse Fulvestrant induced feedback reaction in human breast cancer cells

Hormone therapy has become one of the main strategies for breast cancer, however, many estrogen receptor (ER) positive patients end in tumor collapse due to initial or acquired resistance to hormone treatment, which includes Fulvestrant. Here we report that ErbB receptors and downstream PI3K/AKT and ERK pathway have been reactivated after treatment of Fulvestrant in ER positive MCF‐7 and T47D cells, which are related to Fulvestrant resistance. HSP90 is a universally expressed chaperone protein and plays a vital role in both normal and cancer cells, HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 can reverse this feedback reactivation effect of Fulvestrant by targeting multiple proteins related in ErbB receptors, PI3K/AKT and ERK pathway, which is much better than single targeting inhibitors. We also consolidate these effects in human fresh breast tumors. Combination of AUY922 and Fulvestrant may become a promising therapy strategy in breast cancer treatment.     

Combined effects of novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 and nilotinib in a random mutagenesis screen

To overcome imatinib resistance, more potent ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as nilotinib and dasatinib have been developed, with demonstrable preclinical activity against most imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, with the exception of T315I. However, imatinib-resistant patients already harboring mutations have a higher likelihood of developing further mutations under the selective pressure of potent ABL TKIs. NVP-AUY922 (Novartis) is a novel 4,5-diaryloxazole adenosine triphosphate-binding site heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, which has been shown to inhibit the chaperone function of HSP90 and deplete the levels of HSP90 client protein including BCR-ABL. In this study, we investigated the combined effects of AUY922 and nilotinib on random mutagenesis for BCR-ABL mutation (Blood, 109; 5011, 2007). Compared with single agents, combination with AUY922 and nilotinib was more effective at reducing the outgrowth of resistant cell clones. No outgrowth was observed in the presence of 2?μM of nilotinib and 20?nM of AUY922. The observed data from the isobologram indicated the synergistic effect of simultaneous exposure to AUY922 and nilotinib even in BaF3 cells expressing BCR-ABL mutants including T315I. In vivo studies also demonstrated that the combination of AUY922 and nilotinib prolonged the survival of mice transplanted with mixture of BaF3 cells expressing wild-type BCR-ABL and mutant forms. Taken together, this study shows that the combination of AUY922 and nilotinib exhibits a desirable therapeutic index that can reduce the in vivo growth of mutant forms of BCR-ABL-expressing cells.     

PI3K-independent mTOR activation promotes lapatinib resistance and IAP expression that can be effectively reversed by mTOR and Hsp90 inhibition

Although HER2 targeted therapies have substantially improved outcomes in HER2 overexpressing (HER2+) breast cancer, resistance to these therapies remains a clinical challenge. To better understand the mechanisms of resistance to lapatinib, a HER2 and EGFR dual kinase inhibitor, we treated HER2+ breast cancer cells with lapatinib for an extended period to generate a lapatinib-resistant (LapR) cell line model and examined cancer-promoting signaling activation in LapR cells. We found that LapR cells possess enhanced mTOR activation, which was independent of PI3K and other known mTOR activators. Lapatinib resistance could be reversed by mTOR kinase inhibition. Intriguingly, LapR cells had constitutive cytosolic cytochrome C, indicating that LapR cells suppress lapatinib-induced apoptosis downstream of cytochrome C release from mitochondria into the cytosol rather than by preventing its release into the cytosol. Consistent with this notion, LapR cells possessed increased levels of 2 of the inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs), survivin and c-IAP-2, which are reported to block caspase activation downstream of cytosolic cytochrome C release. Further, treatment with the mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 or the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG reversed expression of IAPs and overcame lapatinib resistance in LapR cells. Together, these data suggest that suppression of apoptosis downstream of cytosolic cytochrome C release, possibly through increased expression of IAPs or other caspase-suppressing proteins, may promote lapatinib resistance. Further, PI3K is thought to be the main driver of lapatinib resistance, but our findings indicate that PI3K inhibitors may be ineffective in some lapatinib-resistant HER2+ breast cancers with PI3K-independent activation of mTOR kinase, which may instead benefit from mTOR or Hsp90 inhibitors.     

Impact of dual mTORC1/2 mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 on acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer in vitro

Introduction

Upregulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling in endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC) has identified mTOR as an attractive target alongside anti-hormones to control resistance. RAD001 (everolimus/Afinitor®), an allosteric mTOR inhibitor, is proving valuable in this setting; however, some patients are inherently refractory or relapse during treatment requiring alternative strategies. Here we evaluate the potential for novel dual mTORC1/2 mTOR kinase inhibitors, exemplified by AZD8055, by comparison with RAD001 in ER + endocrine resistant BC cells.

Methods

In vitro models of tamoxifen (TamR) or oestrogen deprivation resistance (MCF7-X) were treated with RAD001 or AZD8055 alone or combined with anti-hormone fulvestrant. Endpoints included growth, cell proliferation (Ki67), viability and migration, with PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling impact monitored by Western blotting. Potential ER cross-talk was investigated by immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR.

Results

RAD001 was a poor growth inhibitor of MCF7-derived TamR and MCF7-X cells (IC₅₀ ≥1 μM), rapidly inhibiting mTORC1 but not mTORC2/AKT signalling. In contrast AZD8055, which rapidly inhibited both mTORC1 and mTORC2/AKT activity, was a highly effective (P <0.001) growth inhibitor of TamR (IC₅₀ 18 nM) and MCF7-X (IC₅₀ 24 nM), and of a further T47D-derived tamoxifen resistant model T47D-tamR (IC₅₀ 19 nM). AZD8055 significantly (P <0.05) inhibited resistant cell proliferation, increased cell death and reduced migration. Furthermore, dual treatment of TamR or MCF7-X cells with AZD8055 plus fulvestrant provided superior control of resistant growth versus either agent alone (P <0.05). Co-treating with AZD8055 alongside tamoxifen (P <0.01) or oestrogen deprivation (P <0.05) also effectively inhibited endocrine responsive MCF-7 cells. Although AZD8055 inhibited oestrogen receptor (ER) ser167 phosphorylation in TamR and MCF7-X, it had no effect on ER ser118 activity or expression of several ER-regulated genes, suggesting the mTOR kinase inhibitor impact was largely ER-independent. The capacity of AZD8055 for ER-independent activity was further evidenced by growth inhibition (IC₅₀18 and 20 nM) of two acquired fulvestrant resistant models lacking ER.

Conclusions

This is the first report demonstrating dual mTORC1/2 mTOR kinase inhibitors have potential to control acquired endocrine resistant BC, even under conditions where everolimus fails. Such inhibitors may prove of particular benefit when used alongside anti-hormonal treatment as second-line therapy in endocrine resistant disease, and also potentially alongside anti-hormones during the earlier endocrine responsive phase to hinder development of resistance.     

Anti‐tumor activity of the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 in HER2 positive breast cancer cells

Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3‐related (ATR) proteins are sensors of DNA damage, which induces homologous recombination (HR)‐dependent repair. ATR is a master regulator of DNA damage repair (DDR), signaling to control DNA replication, DNA repair and apoptosis. Therefore, the ATR pathway might be an attractive target for developing new drugs. This study was designed to investigate the antitumor effects of the ATR inhibitor, AZD6738 and its underlying mechanism in human breast cancer cells. Growth inhibitory effects of AZD6738 against human breast cancer cell lines were studied using a 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)?2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium, MTT) assay. Cell cycle analysis, Western blotting, immunofluorescence and comet assays were also performed to elucidate underlying mechanisms of AZD6738 action. Anti‐proliferative and DDR inhibitory effects of AZD6738 were demonstrated in human breast cancer cell lines. Among 13 cell lines, the IC₅₀ values of nine cell lines were less than 1 μmol/L using MTT assay. Two cell lines, SK‐BR‐3 and BT‐474, were chosen for further evaluation focused on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer cells. Sensitive SK‐BR‐3 but not the less sensitive BT‐474 breast cancer cells showed increased level of apoptosis and S phase arrest and reduced expression levels of phosphorylated check‐point kinase 1 (CHK1) and other repair markers. Decreased functional CHK1 expression induced DNA damage accumulation due to HR inactivation. AZD6738 showed synergistic activity with cisplatin. Understanding the antitumor activity and mechanisms of AZD6738 in HER2‐positive breast cancer cells creates the possibility for future clinical trials targeting DDR in HER2‐positive breast cancer treatment.     

Enhanced apoptosis and tumor growth suppression elicited by combination of MEK (selumetinib) and mTOR kinase inhibitors (AZD8055)

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathways interact at multiple nodes in cancer, including at mTOR complexes, suggesting an increased likelihood of redundancy and innate resistance to any therapeutic effects of single pathway inhibition. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effects of combining the MAPK extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK)1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) with the dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor (AZD8055). Concurrent dosing in nude mouse xenograft models of human lung adenocarcinoma (non-small cell lung cancers) and colorectal carcinoma was well tolerated and produced increased antitumor efficacy relative to the respective monotherapies. Pharmacodynamic analysis documented reciprocal pathway inhibition associated with increased apoptosis and Bim expression in tumor tissue from the combination group, where key genes such as DUSP6 that are under MEK functional control were also modulated. Our work offers a strong rationale to combine selumetinib and AZD8055 in clinical trials as an attractive therapeutic strategy.     

AZD3409 inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells with intrinsic resistance to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib

AKT and MAPK signaling are involved in the resistance of breast cancer cells to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. RAS proteins are upstream mediators that transfer messages from surface receptors to intracellular signal transducers including MAPK and AKT pathways. AZD3409 is a novel prenyl inhibitor that has shown activity against both farnesyl transferase and geranylgeranyl transferase in isolated enzyme studies. We explored the activity of AZD3409 on breast cancer cell lines with high (SK-Br-3), intermediate (MDA-MB-361) or low (MDA-MB-468) sensitivity to gefitinib. We found that AZD3409 inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner, with the MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-361 cell lines showing higher sensitivity as compared with SK-Br-3 cells. Treatment with AZD3409 produced a significant reduction in the levels of activation of AKT in the three cell lines. AZD3409 also induced an increase in the expression of p27kip-1 and of hypophosphorylated forms of pRb2 in MDA-MB-468 cells that was associated with accumulation of cells in G0/G1 and the appearance of a sub-G1 peak suggestive of apoptosis. In contrast, AZD3409 produced a G2 arrest associated with reduced expression of pRb2 in MDA-MB-361 cells. A synergistic anti-tumor effect was observed when MDA-MB-468 or MDA-MB-361 cells were treated with both AZD3409 and gefitinib, whereas this combination was only additive in SK-Br-3 cells. However, treatment of breast cancer cells with AZD3409 and gefitinib did not produce a more significant blockade of AKT signaling as compared with gefitinib alone. These data suggest that AZD3409 might be active in gefitinib-resistant breast carcinoma.     

The dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor AZD8055 has anti-tumor activity in acute myeloid leukemia

The serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is crucial for cell growth and proliferation, and is constitutively activated in primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells, therefore representing a major target for drug development in this disease. We show here that the specific mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 blocked mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling in AML. Particularly, AZD8055 fully inhibited multisite eIF4E-binding protein 1 phosphorylation, subsequently blocking protein translation, which was in contrast to the effects of rapamycin. In addition, the mTORC1-dependent PI3K/Akt feedback activation was fully abrogated in AZD8055-treated AML cells. Significantly, AZD8055 decreased AML blast cell proliferation and cell cycle progression, reduced the clonogenic growth of leukemic progenitors and induced caspase-dependent apoptosis in leukemic cells but not in normal immature CD34+ cells. Interestingly, AZD8055 strongly induced autophagy, which may be either protective or cell death inducing, depending on concentration. Finally, AZD8055 markedly increased the survival of AML transplanted mice through a significant reduction of tumor growth, without apparent toxicity. Our current results strongly suggest that AZD8055 should be tested in AML patients in clinical trials.     

AZD6244 (ARRY‐142886) enhances the antitumor activity of rapamycin in mouse models of human hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND:

The protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (AKT/mTOR) and mitogen activated protein kinase/extracellular regulated kinase kinase/extracellular regulated kinase (MEK/ERK) signaling pathways have been shown to play an important role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) growth and angiogenesis, suggesting that inhibition of these pathways may have therapeutic potential.

METHODS:

We treated patient‐derived HCC xenografts with 1) mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (RAPA); 2) MEK inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY‐142886); and 3) AZD6244 plus RAPA (AZD6244/RAPA). Western blotting was used to determine pharmacodynamic changes in biomarkers relevant to angiogenesis, mTOR pathway, and MEK signaling. Apoptosis, microvessel density, and cell proliferation were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS:

We report here that pharmacological inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway by AZD6244 enhanced the antitumor and antiangiogenic activities of mTOR inhibitor RAPA in both orthotopic and ectopic models of HCC. Such inhibition led to increased apoptosis, decreased angiogenesis and cell proliferation, reduced expression of positive cell cycle regulators, and increase in proapoptotic protein Bim.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings indicate that the AZD6244/RAPA combination had antitumor and antiangiogenic effects in preclinical models of human HCC. Given the urgent need for effective therapies in HCC, clinical evaluating AZD6244/RAPA combination seems warranted. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

BAY 1125976, a selective allosteric AKT1/2 inhibitor,exhibits high efficacy on AKT signaling‐dependent tumor growth in mouse models

The PI3K‐AKT‐mTOR signaling cascade is activated in the majority of human cancers, and its activation also plays a key role in resistance to chemo and targeted therapeutics. In particular, in both breast and prostate cancer, increased AKT pathway activity is associated with cancer progression, treatment resistance and poor disease outcome. Here, we evaluated the activity of a novel allosteric AKT1/2 inhibitor, BAY 1125976, in biochemical, cellular mechanistic, functional and in vivo efficacy studies in a variety of tumor models. In in vitro kinase activity assays, BAY 1125976 potently and selectively inhibited the activity of full‐length AKT1 and AKT2 by binding into an allosteric binding pocket formed by kinase and PH domain. In accordance with this proposed allosteric binding mode, BAY 1125976 bound to inactive AKT1 and inhibited T308 phosphorylation by PDK1, while the activity of truncated AKT proteins lacking the pleckstrin homology domain was not inhibited. In vitro, BAY 1125976 inhibited cell proliferation in a broad panel of human cancer cell lines. Particularly high activity was observed in breast and prostate cancer cell lines expressing estrogen or androgen receptors. Furthermore, BAY 1125976 exhibited strong in vivo efficacy in both cell line and patient‐derived xenograft models such as the KPL4 breast cancer model (PIK3CA^H1074R mutant), the MCF7 and HBCx‐2 breast cancer models and the AKT^E17K mutant driven prostate cancer (LAPC‐4) and anal cancer (AXF 984) models. These findings indicate that BAY 1125976 is a potent and highly selective allosteric AKT1/2 inhibitor that targets tumors displaying PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation, providing opportunities for the clinical development of new, effective treatments.     

The PIM inhibitor AZD1208 synergizes with ruxolitinib to induce apoptosis of ruxolitinib sensitive and resistant JAK2-V617F-driven cells and inhibit colony formation of primary MPN cells

Classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell disorders that exhibit excess mature myeloid cells, bone marrow fibrosis, and risk of leukemic transformation. Aberrant JAK2 signaling plays an etiological role in MPN formation. Because neoplastic cells in patients are largely insensitive to current anti-JAK2 therapies, effective therapies remain needed. Members of the PIM family of serine/threonine kinases are induced by JAK/STAT signaling, regulate hematopoietic stem cell growth, protect hematopoietic cells from apoptosis, and exhibit hematopoietic cell transforming properties. We hypothesized that PIM kinases may offer a therapeutic target for MPNs. We treated JAK2-V617F-dependent MPN model cells as well as primary MPN patient cells with the PIM kinase inhibitors SGI-1776 and AZD1208 and the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. While MPN model cells were rather insensitive to PIM inhibitors, combination of PIM inhibitors with ruxolitinib led to a synergistic effect on MPN cell growth due to enhanced apoptosis. Importantly, PIM inhibitor mono-therapy inhibited, and AZD1208/ruxolitinib combination therapy synergistically suppressed, colony formation of primary MPN cells. Enhanced apoptosis by combination therapy was associated with activation of BAD, inhibition of downstream components of the mTOR pathway, including p70S6K and S6 protein, and activation of 4EBP1. Importantly, PIM inhibitors re-sensitized ruxolitinib-resistant MPN cells to ruxolitinib by inducing apoptosis. Finally, exogenous expression of PIM1 induced ruxolitinib resistance in MPN model cells. These data indicate that PIMs may play a role in MPNs and that combining PIM and JAK2 kinase inhibitors may offer a more efficacious therapeutic approach for MPNs over JAK2 inhibitor mono-therapy.     

Antitumor activity of selective MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 in combination with PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models

Purpose

Although the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) gefitinib have shown dramatic effects against EGFR mutant lung cancer, patients become resistant by various mechanisms, including gatekeeper EGFR-T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS mutation, thereafter relapsing. AZD6244 is a potent, selective, and orally available MEK1/2 inhibitor. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of AZD6244 alone or with BEZ235, an orally available potent inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) models.

Experimental design

NCI-H1975 with EGFR-T790M mutation, NCI-H1993 with MET amplification and NCI-H460 with KRAS/PIK3CA mutation human NSCLC cells were subcutaneous injected into the athymic nude mice respectively. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment with AZD6244, BEZ235, AZD6244 plus BEZ235, or control for 3 weeks, then all mice were sacrificed and tumor tissues were subjected to western blot analyses and immunohistochemical staining.

Results

AZD6244 could inhibit the tumor growth of NCI-H1993, but slightly inhibit the tumor growth of NCI-1975 and NCI-H460. Combining AZD6244 with BEZ235 markedly enhanced their antitumor effects and without any marked adverse events. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical staining revealed that AZD6244 alone reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, angiogenesis, and tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, MEK1/2 inhibition resulted in decreased AKT phosphorylation in NCI-H1993 tumor model. BEZ235 also inhibited AKT phosphorylation as well as their downstream molecules in all three tumor models. The antiangiogenic effects were substantially enhanced when the agents were combined, which may due to the reduced expression of matrix metallopeptidase-9 in tumor tissues (MMP-9).

Conclusions

In this study, we evaluated therapy directed against MEK and PI3K/mTOR in distinct gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models. Combining AZD6244 with BEZ235 enhanced their antitumor and antiangiogenic effects. We concluded that the combination of a selective MEK inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor was effective in suppressing the growth of gefitinib-resistant tumors caused by EGFR T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS/PIK3CA mutation. This new therapeutic strategy may be a practical approach in the treatment of these patients.     

Heregulin induces resistance to lapatinib‐mediated growth inhibition of HER2‐amplified cancer cells

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification occurs in approximately 20% of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers in the United States and European Union. Lapatinib, a dual HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in HER2‐amplified cancer cells. However, several studies have shown that some cytokines can mediate resistance to lapatinib using their receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways. One of these, Heregulin1 (HRG1), can confer resistance to lapatinib‐mediated growth inhibition in HER2‐amplified breast cancer cells, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we investigated whether and how HRG1 causes resistance to lapatinib in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers in vitro. HER2‐amplified gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer cell lines were highly sensitive to lapatinib. Exposure to HRG1 together with lapatinib rescued cells from lapatinib‐induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Downregulation of HER3 with siRNA in the presence of HRG1 re‐sensitized HER2‐amplified cancer cells to lapatinib. Immunoblotting analysis indicated that HRG1 re‐activated HER3 and AKT in the presence of lapatinib, which persisted for at least 72 h. Activation of HER3 and downstream AKT was mediated by residual activity of HER2. HRG1‐mediated resistance could be reduced by PI3K/mTOR inhibitors or by complete inhibition of HER2. Thus, we conclude that HRG1 mediates resistance to lapatinib through HER3 and AKT activation, and that this depends on residual HER2 activity. Lapatinib in combination with anti‐PI3K therapies or more potent HER2 inhibitors would improve the efficacy and avoid the emergence of resistant cells.