Consumption of meat,traditional and modern processed meat and colorectal cancer risk among the Moroccan population: A large-scale case–control study

The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between red and white meat subtypes, processed meat (divided into traditional “Khlii, Kaddid” and industrially processed meat) and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, considering CRC subsites, in Moroccan adults. A case–control study was conducted including 2,906 matched case–control pairs recruited from the five largest university hospitals in Morocco. Dietary data were collected through a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariable odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the association of CRC risk with meat consumption (high vs. low intake), were estimated using conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for relevant confounding variables. Overall, consumption of red meat was positively associated with colon cancer and CRC risk (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05–1.44; OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02–1.27), respectively. In contrast, no significant association was observed between the consumption of red meat and rectal cancer risk (OR = 1.05, 95% = 0.90–1.23). Interestingly, while processed meat from industrial processes was positively associated with colon cancer, rectal cancer and CRC (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.27–2.04; OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.34–2.23; OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.41–1.98), processed meat prepared using traditional methods was inversely associated with colon cancer and CRC risk (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57–0.98; OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64–0.93), respectively. Furthermore, positive associations were observed between poultry intake and colon cancer risk among men (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.01–1.59). Our study showed similar associations between the consumption of red meat and CRC risk in Morocco as in developed countries, while inverse associations were found for traditionally processed meat products. This is the first study to investigate the differential effects of traditional vs. westernized processed meat products in a developing country. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings and to understand the physiological pathways underlying these associations.     

Inflammatory potential of the diet and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study

Proinflammatory diets are associated with risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), however, inconsistencies exist in subsite- and sex-specific associations. The relationship between CRC and combined lifestyle-related factors that contribute toward a low-grade inflammatory profile has not yet been explored. We examined the association between the dietary inflammatory potential and an inflammatory profile and CRC risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. This cohort included 476,160 participants followed-up of 14 years and 5,991 incident CRC cases (3,897 colon and 2,094 rectal tumors). Dietary inflammatory potential was estimated using an Inflammatory Score of the Diet (ISD). An Inflammatory Profile Score (IPS) was constructed, incorporating the ISD, physical activity level and abdominal obesity. The associations between the ISD and CRC and IPS and CRC were assessed using multivariable regression models. More proinflammatory diets were related to a higher CRC risk, particularly for colon cancer; hazard ratio (HR) for highest versus lowest ISD quartile was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.27) for CRC, 1.24 (95% CI 1.09–1.41) for colon cancer and 0.99 (95% CI 0.83–1.17) for rectal cancer. Associations were more pronounced in men and not significant in women. The IPS was associated with CRC risk, particularly colon cancer among men; HRs for the highest versus lowest IPS was 1.62 (95% CI 1.31–2.01) for colon cancer overall and 2.11 (95% CI 1.50–2.97) for colon cancer in men. Our study shows that more proinflammatory diets and a more inflammatory profile are associated with higher risk of CRC, principally colon cancer and in men.     

Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations and colorectal cancer risk

BackgroundThe World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) released in 2007 eight recommendations for cancer prevention on body fatness, diet and physical activity. Our aim is to evaluate the relation between adherence to these recommendations and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.MethodsWe pooled data from two Italian case–control studies including overall 2419 patients with CRC and 4723 controls. Adherence to the WCRF/AICR guidelines was summarised through a score incorporating seven of the WCRF/AICR recommendations, with higher scores indicating higher adherence to the guidelines. Odds ratios (ORs) of colorectal cancer were estimated using multiple logistic regression models.ResultsHigher adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations was associated with a significantly reduced CRC risk (OR 0.67, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.56–0.80 for a score ≥5 versus <3.5), with a significant trend of decreasing risk for increasing adherence (p < 0.001). Consistent results were found for colon (OR 0.67) and rectal cancer (OR 0.67). Inverse associations were observed with the diet-specific WCRF/AICR score (OR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.61–0.84 for ≥3.5 versus <2.5 points) and with specific recommendations on body fatness (OR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.70–0.97), physical activity (OR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75–1.00), foods and drinks that promote weight gain (OR 0.70, 95% CI, 0.56–0.89), foods of plant origin (OR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.42–0.76), limiting alcohol (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77–0.99) and salt intake (OR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.48–0.84).ConclusionOur study indicated that adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations is inversely related to CRC risk.     

Predictors of undergoing multivisceral resection,margin status and survival in Dutch patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this nationwide observational study was to evaluate factors associated with multivisceral resection (MVR), margin status and overall survival in locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).Material and methodsPatients with (y)pT4, cM0 CRC between 2006 and 2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox-proportional hazards modelling was used for survival analysis, stratified for T4a and T4b. Annual hospital volume cut-off was 75 for colon and 40 for rectal resections.ResultsA total of 11.930 patients were included and 2410 patients (20.2%) underwent MVR. Factors associated with MVR for colon and rectal cancer besides cT4 category were more recent diagnosis (OR 3.61, CI 95% 3.06–4.25 (colon) and OR 2.72, CI 95% 1.82–4.08 (rectum)) and high hospital volume (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.05–1.38 (colon) and OR 2.17, CI 95% 1.55–3.04 (rectum)). Patients ≥70 year were less likely to undergo MVR for colon cancer (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.90). Risk factors for incomplete resection were cT4 (OR 3.08, CI 95% 2.35–4.04 (colon) and OR 1.82, CI 95% 1.13–2.94 (rectum)) and poor/undifferentiated tumors (OR 1.41, CI 95% 1.14–1.72 (colon) and OR 1.69, CI 95% 1.05–2.74 (rectum)). More recent diagnosis was independently associated with less incomplete resections in colon cancer (OR 0.58, CI 95% 0.40–0.76). Independent predictors of survival were age, resection margin, nodal status and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not MVR.ConclusionTreatment of locally advanced CRC with MVR at population level was influenced by year of diagnosis and hospital volume. Margin status in colon cancer improved substantially over time.     

Common dietary patterns and risk of cancers of the colon and rectum: Analysis from the United Kingdom Women's Cohort Study (UKWCS)

Few prospective cohort studies in the UK have specifically focused on the associations between commonly consumed dietary patterns and colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of our study was to assess whether red meat, poultry, fish and vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with differences in the incidence of cancers of colon and rectum in the UKWCS. Four common dietary patterns were defined based on a hierarchy of consumption of red meat, poultry and fish for each cohort participant, using a 217‐item food frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to provide adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CRC. A total of 32,147 women recruited and surveyed between 1995 and 1998 were followed up for a mean of 17.2 years (426,798 person‐years). A total of 462 incident CRC cases were documented; 335 colon cancers (172 proximal and 119 distal) and 152 in the rectum. In multivariable‐adjusted models, there was no evidence of a reduction in risk of overall CRC (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.66–1.12), colon cancer (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.56–1.05) or rectal cancer (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.66–1.63) when comparing grouped red meat free diets with diets containing red meat. Exploratory analysis suggested a reduced risk of distal colon cancer in grouped red meat free diets (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34–0.95), though numbers with this outcome were small. These results indicate that a protective association of red meat free diets specifically on distal colon cancer merits confirmation in a larger study.     

Meat subtypes and their association with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Associations between specific red meat subtypes and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) have been investigated in a number of epidemiological studies. However, no publication to date has summarised the overall epidemiological evidence. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies (cohort, nested case‐control or case‐cohort studies), which reported relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between intake of meat subtypes with colorectal, colon or rectal cancer or colorectal adenoma risk. PubMed and ISI Web of Science were searched up until August 1, 2014. Nineteen studies examined meat subtypes (5 beef, 5 pork, 2 lamb, 1 veal and 19 poultry) and associations with colorectal, colon or rectal cancer risk and 4 studies examined associations with adenoma risk (1 beef and 4 poultry). Comparing highest versus lowest intake, beef consumption was associated with an increased risk of CRC (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.22) and colon cancer (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.44), but no association was found with rectal cancer (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.16). Higher consumption of lamb was also associated with increased risk of CRC (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.44). No association was observed for pork (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.27), but some between study heterogeneity was observed. No association was observed for poultry consumption and risk of colorectal adenomas or cancer. This meta‐analysis suggests that red meat subtypes differ in their association with CRC and its sub sites. Further analysis of data from prospective cohort studies is warranted, especially regarding the role of pork.     

Family history of hormonal cancers and colorectal cancer risk: A case‐control study conducted in Ontario

Aggregation of cancers among families with highly penetrant genetic mutations such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is well‐described. However, there is a paucity of data regarding familial aggregation of hormonal cancers (cancers of the breast, endometrial, ovarian and prostate) and colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population. We investigated the association between having a first‐degree family history of breast, endometrial, ovarian, or prostate cancer and CRC risk. Population‐based CRC cases and controls were recruited by the Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry (OFCCR). Logistic regression was conducted to obtain odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). First‐degree family history of breast cancer was associated with a modest, borderline statistically significant increased CRC risk (age‐, sex‐adjusted OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0, 1.5). The magnitude of CRC risk was greatest if more than one first‐degree kin had breast cancer (age‐, sex‐adjusted OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.0), as well as if the kin was diagnosed at >50 years of age (age‐, sex‐adjusted OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1, 1.8). Family history of ovarian cancer was associated with reduced CRC risk (multivariate‐adjusted OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.3, 1.0). Although statistically significant increases in CRC risk were observed in the age‐, sex‐adjusted OR estimates for family history of endometrial and prostate cancers, the associations were no longer significant after multivariate‐adjustment. In conclusion, individuals with a first‐degree kin with breast cancer may have a modest increased risk for CRC compared to individuals without. © 2009 UICC     

Association between p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Asian population: a meta-analysis

Although several published studies have investigated the association between p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), their results have been ambiguous. To examine the overall relationship between published case–control studies of Asian subjects, we conducted a meta-analysis based on 13 studies. Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure were screened for studies carried out up to November 1, 2017. To evaluating the association, crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The results of our meta-analysis indicated that the p53 Arg72Pro gene polymorphism does not correlate with the risk of CRC in the pooled analysis. However, significant results were found in Chinese population (allele model: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.03-1.53; homozygous model: OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.09-2.40; recessive model: OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.22-1.82). Moreover, in subgroup analyses, the Pro/Pro genotype was significantly associated with rectal cancer, and not colon cancer. Stratification by source of control and gender indicated that Pro/Pro genotype and Pro allele also correlated with CRC risk in the population-based subgroup and in men. Thus, our current meta-analysis indicates no evidence for the association between the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and CRC risk in the Asian population, but significant association in Chinese population, especially for rectal cancer and in men. Further research with larger population sizes is still warranted to confirm this result.     

随访队列的结直肠癌危险因素的病例-对照研究

目的研究环境暴露因素与结直肠癌发病的联系,为采取有效的预防措施提供科学依据.方法以嘉善结直肠癌筛检队列为研究人群,采用单纯随机抽样方法选择正常人对照343例,以及随访至今发生的结直肠癌存活病例126例,进行结直肠癌流行病学调查,并以非条件logistic回归法分析各因素与结直肠癌发生的关系.结果同事吸烟、粘液血便史、服用导泻药史、肠息肉史、乙肝史、家族结直肠癌史和常食动物油是结肠癌的危险因素,OR值依次为:4.87、28.84、13.00、7.68、6.98、5.55和2.41,香蕉 (OR=0.66)是保护因素;粘液血便史(OR=112.04),腺瘤史(OR=31.92),肠息肉史(OR=8.07),腹部手术史(OR=2.40),食用炸肉(OR=12.88),红烧鱼(OR=1.77),均为直肠癌的危险因子,常饮深井水(OR=0.32),常吃白菜、蘑菇、西瓜和爱吃白糖能显著降低直肠癌的风险,OR依次为:0.32、0.60、0.51、0.67和0.55.结论同事吸烟、粘液血便史、服用导泻药史、肠息肉史、乙肝史、家族结直肠癌史、和动物油、炸肉、红烧鱼、香蕉、白菜、蘑菇、西瓜等饮食与结直肠癌的发生有一定影响.     

Associations between 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase codon 677 and 1298 genetic polymorphisms and environmental factors with reference to susceptibility to colorectal cancer: a case-control study in an Indian population

Although the incidence rate of colorectal cancer is very low, and rectal cancer remains more common in India, a significant increase in its incidence has been reported for both men and women over the last 2 decades. We evaluated MTHFR genetic susceptibility and common environmental risk factors in the development of colon and rectal cancer, and assessed the interactions between gene and environmental factors with colorectal cancer in a case-control study in the Indian population. The study included 59 colon cancer cases, 243 rectal cancer cases and 291 controls. The variant MTHFR 677T allele is rare, while the 1298C allele is common among Indians. MTHFR 677T showed no association with colon cancer (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.28-2.05) and a nonstatistically significantly elevated risk with rectal cancer (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 0.86-2.68), and MTHFR 1298 CC genotype was found to be associated with a significantly decreased risk for both colon cancer (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.81) and rectal cancer (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.80). High intake of nonfried vegetables or fruits was inversely associated with both colon and rectal cancer risk. Especially, the combination of a high intake of nonfried vegetables and MTHFR 1298CC genotype was associated with the lowest rectal cancer risk (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.52). Regarding alcohol consumption, indigenous Indian alcohol drinkers (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 0.86-6.36), and those consuming alcohol for duration more than 20 years (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.73-3.33), were at a somewhat higher rectal cancer risk. Moreover, the consumed alcohol amount (gram-years) may be also associated with colon or rectal cancer risk.     

Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer following a primary colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study

Individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at risk of developing a metachronous CRC. We examined the associations between personal, tumour‐related and lifestyle risk factors, and risk of metachronous CRC. A total of 7,863 participants with incident colon or rectal cancer who were recruited in the USA, Canada and Australia to the Colon Cancer Family Registry during 1997‐2012, except those identified as high‐risk, for example, Lynch syndrome, were followed up approximately every 5 years. We estimated the risk of metachronous CRC, defined as the first new primary CRC following an interval of at least one year after the initial CRC diagnosis. Observation time started at the age at diagnosis of the initial CRC and ended at the age at diagnosis of the metachronous CRC, last contact or death whichever occurred earliest, or were censored at the age at diagnosis of any metachronous colorectal adenoma. Cox regression was used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During a mean follow‐up of 6.6 years, 142 (1.81%) metachronous CRCs were diagnosed (mean age at diagnosis 59.8; incidence 2.7/1,000 person‐years). An increased risk of metachronous CRC was associated with the presence of a synchronous CRC (HR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.30–5.72) and the location of cancer in the proximal colon at initial diagnosis (compared with distal colon or rectum, HR = 4.16; 95% CI: 2.80–6.18). The presence of a synchronous CRC and the location of the initial CRC might be useful for deciding the intensity of surveillance colonoscopy for individuals diagnosed with CRC.     

Family history of cancer and risk of colorectal cancer in Italy.

Subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at increased risk of CRC, but quantification of the risk in different populations, the possible differences in risk according to localization of the cancer and the association of family history of other cancers with CRC risk are still open issues. We have therefore analysed data from a multicentric case-control study conducted in six Italian areas between 1992 and 1996 of 1225 incident cases of colon cancer, 728 cases of rectal cancer and 4154 controls admitted for acute conditions to the same network of hospitals as the cases. Unconditional logistic regression models including terms for gender, age, study centre, years of education and number of siblings were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of CRC according to various aspects of history of CRC and other cancers in first-degree relatives. The OR for family history of CRC was 3.2 (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.5-4.1) for colon cancer and 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-3.1) for rectal cancer. Colon cancer was significantly associated with a family history of stomach (OR 1.4), bone (OR 2.1) and kidney (OR 2.3) cancers, while rectal cancer was significantly associated with a family history of lymphomas (OR 2.8). There was a 30% higher risk of colon and rectal cancer in subjects with a family history of any cancer, excluding intestine. The ORs for family history of CRC were 5.2 for colon and 6.3 for rectum when the proband''s age was below 45 years. The ORs were similar when the affected relative was a parent or a sibling and in different strata of age of relative(s). For subjects with two or more first-degree relatives with CRC, the risk was 6.9 for the right colon, 5.8 for the transverse and descending colon, 3.8 for the sigma, 3.2 for the rectosigmoid junction and 1.9 for the rectum. This study confirms that a family history of CRC in first-degree relatives increases the risk of both colon and rectal cancer, the association being stronger at younger ages and for right colon.     

Association of hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD) (HPGD) variants and colorectal cancer risk

A recent study examined associations of tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) in 43 fatty acid metabolism-related genes and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), showing rs8752, rs2612656 and a haplotype [comprising both of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] in the hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD) (HPGD) gene to be positively associated with CRC risk. In the present study, we attempted to replicate these single marker and haplotype associations, using 1795 CRC cases and 1805 controls from the German Darmkrebs: Chancen der Verhütung durch Screening study (DACHS). In addition to rs8752 and rs2612656, HPGD tagSNPs rs9312555, rs17360144 and rs7349744 were genotyped for haplotype analyses. Except for a marginally significant inverse association of HPGD rs8752 with CRC risk [odds ratio (OR) = 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74, 0.98; P = 0.03], none of the analyzed tagSNPs showed any association with CRC. Subset analyses for colon and rectal cancers yielded similar, yet non-significant risk estimates at all five loci. Also, none of the haplotypes was found to be associated with CRC, colon or rectal cancers. However, rs8752 was significantly associated with a decreased risk of CRC among individuals with a body mass index < 30 (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70, 0.95, P = 0.01) as well as among smokers (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61, 0.90, P = 0.003). Yet, our data do not support the previously reported associations of HPGD tagSNPs and risk of CRC.     

Coffee consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer by anatomical subsite in Japan: Results from the HERPACC studies

Consumption of coffee, a popular beverage worldwide, has been associated with lower colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Although CRC exhibits different biological characteristics by anatomical subsite, the possibly heterogeneous impact of coffee on CRC by anatomical subsite has remained unclear. Here, we conducted two case‐control studies to examine the association between coffee consumption and CRC risk as well as risk by anatomic subsite among Japanese using data from the Hospital‐based Epidemiological Research Program at Aichi Cancer Center I and II (HERPACC‐I and II). Subjects were enrolled in HERPACC‐I between 1988 and 2000 and in HERPACC‐II between 2001 and 2005. Coffee consumption was measured with a self‐administered questionnaire. A conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of CRC with coffee consumption, adjusted for potential confounders of age, smoking, alcohol drinking, red meat intake, BMI, exercise, family history of CRC, and diabetes mellitus history. We estimated summary ORs by pooling study‐specific ORs with a fixed effects model. In total, 2,696 CRC cases and 13,480 non‐cancer outpatients as controls were included. Overall, compared to non‐drinkers, ORs of less than 1 cup/day, 1–2 cups/day and 3 or more cups/day for CRC were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77–1.00), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80–1.01) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.92), respectively (trend‐p = 0.009). Subsite‐specific analysis revealed a significant inverse linear trend between coffee consumption and distal colon cancer (p‐trend = 0.048), and a tendency toward a lower risk of rectal cancer (p‐trend = 0.068). These findings suggest that coffee consumption might impact the prevention of CRC, especially distal colon cancer.     

Oral contraceptive use, reproductive factors, and colorectal cancer risk: findings from Wisconsin.

We investigated the association of oral contraceptive (OC) use and reproductive factors with colorectal cancer risk in a large population-based case-control study. Cases were women ages 20 to 74 years, living in Wisconsin, with a new diagnosis of colon (n = 1,122) or rectal (n = 366) cancer. Control participants were randomly selected from population lists of similarly aged female Wisconsin residents (n = 4,297). Risk factor information was collected through structured telephone interviews. Compared with never users, OC users had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.89 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.75-1.06] for colorectal cancer. OC use associations did not differ significantly between colon and rectal cancer sites; however, when compared with never users, recent OC users (<14 years) seemed at reduced risk of rectal cancer (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-1.00). Women with age at first birth older than the median (23 years) had 0.83 times the risk of colon cancer compared with women with age at first birth below the median (95% CI, 0.70-0.98). We observed an inverse trend between increasing parity and rectal cancer risk (P = 0.05). Compared with nulliparous women, women with five or more births had 0.66 times the risk of rectal cancer (95% CI, 0.43-1.02). Compared with postmenopausal women, premenopausal women were at reduced risk (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97) of colorectal cancer. No significant associations were observed between colorectal cancer risk and age at menarche or age at menopause. These findings suggest differential roles of reproductive factors in colon and rectal cancer etiology.     

Association of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Colorectal Cancer Risk in Moroccan Adults: A Large-Scale,Population-Based Case–Control Study

Background: Physical activity has been associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer in studies mainly conducted in high-income countries, while sedentary behavior has been suggested to increase CRC risk. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of physical activity and sedentary behavior on CRC risk in the Moroccan population. Methods: A case-control study was conducted involving 1516 case-control pairs, matched on age, sex and center in five university hospital centers. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographics, lifestyle habits, family history of CRC, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Information on physical activity and sedentary behavior were collected by the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). For each activity (work, household, and recreational activities), a metabolic equivalent (MET) was calculated using GPAQ recommendations. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the association between physical activity, sedentary behavior and the risk of overall CRC, colon cancer, and rectal cancer taking into account other CRC risk factors. Results: High level of physical activity was associated with lower risk of rectal cancer, colon cancer, and overall CRC, the adjusted odds ratios (ORa) for the highest versus the lowest level of activity were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.82), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62-0.96), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62-0.83), respectively. In contrast, sedentary behavior was positively associated with rectal cancer risk (ORa=1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.40), but was unrelated to colon cancer risk (ORa=1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.20). Conclusion: We found an inverse association between physical activity and CRC risk in the Moroccan population, and a positive association between sedentary behavior and rectal cancer risk. Considering that one-third of the total population studied had a sedentary lifestyle, these results may be used to improve strategies of public health suitable for Moroccan population.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">IL6</Emphasis> genotypes and colon and rectal cancer

Inflammation appears to play a key role in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study we examine factors involved in the regulation of inflammation and risk of CRC. Data from a multi-center case–control study of colon (N = 1579 cases and N = 1977 controls) and rectal (N = 794 cases and N = 1005 controls) cancer were used to evaluate the association between the rs1800795 and rs1800796 IL6 polymorphisms and CRC. We evaluated the joint effects of IL6 single nucleotide polymorphisms and regular use of aspirin/NSAIDs and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotype. Having a C allele of the rs1800796 IL6 polymorphisms and the GG genotype of the rs1800795 IL6 polymorphisms was associated with a statistically significantly reduced the risk of colon (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.57, 1.00), but not rectal (OR 1.49 95% CI 1.02,2.16) cancer. Both IL6 polymorphisms were associated with significant interaction with current use of aspirin/NSAIDs to alter risk of colon cancer: individuals with a C allele in either polymorphism who were current users of aspirin/NSAIDs had the lowest colon cancer risk. CRC risk also was associated with an interaction between VDR and IL6 genotypes that was modified by current use of aspirin/NSAIDs. This study provides further support for inflammation-related factors in the etiology of CRC. Other studies are needed to explore other genes in this and other inflammation-related pathways.     

Smoking and survival of colorectal cancer patients: Population‐based study from Germany

Current evidence on the association between smoking and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis after diagnosis is heterogeneous and few have investigated dose‐response effects or outcomes other than overall survival. Therefore, the association of smoking status and intensity with several prognostic outcomes was evaluated in a large population‐based cohort of CRC patients; 3,130 patients with incident CRC, diagnosed between 2003 and 2010, were interviewed on sociodemographic factors, smoking behavior, medication and comorbidities. Tumor characteristics were collected from medical records. Vital status, recurrence and cause of death were documented for a median follow‐up time of 4.9 years. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, associations between smoking characteristics and overall, CRC‐specific, non‐CRC related, recurrence‐free and disease‐free survival were evaluated. Among stage I–III patients, being a smoker at diagnosis and smoking ≥15 cigarettes/day were associated with lower recurrence‐free (adjusted hazard ratios (aHR): 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93–1.79 and aHR: 1.31; 95%‐CI: 0.92–1.87) and disease‐free survival (aHR: 1.26; 95%‐CI: 0.95–1.67 and aHR: 1.29; 95%‐CI: 0.94–1.77). Smoking was associated with decreased survival in stage I–III smokers with pack years ≥20 (Overall survival: aHR: 1.40; 95%‐CI: 1.01–1.95), in colon cancer cases (Overall survival: aHR: 1.51; 95%‐CI: 1.05–2.17) and men (Recurrence‐free survival: aHR: 1.51; 95%‐CI: 1.09–2.10; disease‐free survival: aHR: 1.49; 95%‐CI: 1.12–1.97), whereas no associations were seen among women, stage IV or rectal cancer patients. The observed patterns support the existence of adverse effects of smoking on CRC prognosis among nonmetastatic CRC patients. The potential to enhance prognosis of CRC patients by promotion of smoking cessation, embedded in tertiary prevention programs warrants careful evaluation in future investigations.     

Association between adult weight gain and colorectal cancer: A dose–response meta‐analysis of observational studies

This study investigated the association between adult weight gain and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Using terms related to weight gain and CRC, we searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for relevant studies published before June 2014. Two evaluators independently selected studies according to the selection criteria, and eight studies were included (three case–control and five cohort studies). Summary estimates were obtained using fixed‐ or random‐effects models. The relative risk (RR) of the association between adult weight gain and CRC was 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.43); the RR was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.14–1.49) for colon cancer (CC) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.02–1.58) for rectal cancer (RC) for the highest versus lowest category. For every 5‐kg increase in adult weight, the risk increased by 5% (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.09) for CRC, 6% (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.11) for CC and 6% (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03–1.08) for RC. The subgroup analyses showed a positive association between adult weight gain and risk of CRC only in men, and the RR was 1.65 (95% CI, 1.42–1.92) for the highest versus lowest category of adult weight gain and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.06–1.15) for a 5‐kg increase in adult weight. In conclusion, there is evidence that adult weight gain is associated with an increased risk of CRC. However, the positive association between adult weight gain and risk of CRC is stronger among men than among women.     

Adult weight change and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

AimWeight change during adult life may reflect metabolic changes and influence colorectal cancer (CRC) development, but such role is not well established. We aimed to explore the association between adult weight change (from age 20 to 50) and CRC risk. In particular, we investigated differences according to colon and rectal cancer, sex and measures of attained adiposity.MethodsWe included 201,696 participants from six participating countries in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (1992–2010). During a mean follow-up of 11.2 years 2384 (1194 in men and 1190 in women) incident CRC cases occurred. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for body mass index at age 20 and lifestyle factors at study recruitment were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsAfter multivariable adjustment, each kg of weight gained annually from age 20 to 50 was associated with a 60% higher risk of colon cancer (95% CI 1.20–2.09), but not rectal cancer (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.79–1.62, P_interaction = 0.04). The higher risk of colon cancer was restricted to people with high attained waist circumference at age 50 (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.14–2.91, P_interaction = 0.02). Results were not different in men and women (P_interaction = 0.81).Conclusion(s)Adult weight gain, as reflected by attained abdominal obesity at age 50, increases colon cancer risk in both men and women. These data underline the importance of weight management and metabolic health maintenance in early adult life years for colon cancer prevention.